Bus Rapid Transit
Bus Rapid Transit
Bus Rapid Transit
Example of bus use for Malaysias first BRT system in Sunway lane
Figure 2 shows the elevated BRT guide way at Adelaide O-Bahn Guided
Busway
8.2.2 Freeway
Other type of running ways for BRT system is freeway. A freeway running way is
built according to limits of the cross section of a freeway, either as a part of new
construction or by retrofitting an existing facility. The running way geometry is
depending by the geometry of the freeways general traffic lanes. There are
three forms freeway BRT running ways, which are; median bus way, high
occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, and freeway shoulder.
Freeway median bus way is a lanes dedicated for bus in a median area, usually
separated physically from other forms of traffic. While for high occupancy vehicle
(HOV) lanes, it is a
running way shared with high-occupancy vehicles on either the median side or
the outer lanes of the freeway and not necessarily separated physically from the
general traffic lanes. The difference between bus lanes and HOV lanes is bus lane
are for the exclusive use of buses while HOV lanes may be used by other vehicles
with multiple passengers and taxis. Cyclists often are also permitted to use HOV
lanes. For freeway shoulder, it is a type of freeway that permitted use of the
outside shoulder of general lanes for BRT vehicles.
A median bus way is a dedicated bus facility in the median area sometimes
shared with other high occupancy vehicles and sometimes physically separated
from other forms of traffic with some form of transit priority at locations where it
intersects with other traffic.
A bus lane is similar to a median bus way, but typically located on the outside of
the arterial roadway and sometimes shared with other high-occupancy vehicles.
Typically, the bus lane is not physically separated from the general traffic lanes.
Variations of this form include shared use of the lane for business access and
right turns; it is commonly known as a business access and transit (BAT) lane.
In some conditions, buses in a BRT system may need to operate in mixed traffic
as long as the traffic is free-flowing enough not to cause delays. A mixed traffic
lane is a use of a lane by both transit and general traffic. Intersection treatments
such as roadway widening and added auxiliary lanes at intersections provide
buses with the ability to jump the queue at such locations and provide some
level of improved service times and reliability.
Figure below shows the example of bus way for the implementation of BRT
system.
1. Example of two-way median aligned bus way that is in the central verge of
a two-way road.
2. Example of bus way that runs two-way on the side of a one-way street.
4. Example of bus way that is one-way and centrally aligned in the roadway.
the quality of the station environment, reduce the risk of accidents, project
passengers from the weather, and as well as to prevent pedestrians from
entering the station in unauthorized locations.
As with light rail stations, BRT station are typically placed further apart than
regular bus stops. Distances between stations generally vary between 600m and
2000m. Similarly to light rail, integration with adjacent land uses is feasible.
8.4
BRT also has lower implementation costs than light rail systems because it does
not require electrical power infrastructure such as overhead wires or third rails,
substations, and etc. BRT can use regular roadway building techniques and new,
specialized storage and maintenance facilities are not required. Some BRT
systems do make use of distributed power systems and electrically-powered
buses (trolley buses) but these need not be installed initially.
on
per
passenger
basis.
Lastly, transit-supportive land use changes along BRT may be slower in coming
than along an monorail line as the sense of permanence required for developers
to invest may not be present except with the more extensive (and therefore
more costly) bus way-based BRT systems. Moreover, stations may be constructed
as an afterthought or long after the construction of the destination and suffer
from poor integration with destinations.
Reference
1. Federal Transit Administration, Characteristics of Bus Rapid Transit for
Decision
Making,
August
2004.
http://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/CBRT.pdf
2. American Public Transportation Association, Designing Bus Rapid Transit
Running Ways. October 2010.
3. Kota Kinabalu Briefing on Technical Planning, November 2013.