Scribd
Upload
374 views2 pages

Econ111 Assignment Marking Guide - Q1

1. The document compares Australia and New Zealand's production of apples and oranges. Neither country has an absolute advantage in both goods. Australia has a comparative advantage in apples, while New Zealand has a comparative advantage in oranges. 2. If both countries specialize according to their comparative advantages - with Australia producing apples and New Zealand producing oranges - and then trade, they can both increase their production and consumption. For example, Australia could trade 6,000 apples for New Zealand's 3,000 oranges. 3. Through specialization and trade, the total production of both societies increases. Both countries end up with the same amount of oranges as before, but double the amount of apples, making them both better off.

Uploaded by

jejoullie162
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
374 views2 pages

Econ111 Assignment Marking Guide - Q1

1. The document compares Australia and New Zealand's production of apples and oranges. Neither country has an absolute advantage in both goods. Australia has a comparative advantage in apples, while New Zealand has a comparative advantage in oranges. 2. If both countries specialize according to their comparative advantages - with Australia producing apples and New Zealand producing oranges - and then trade, they can both increase their production and consumption. For example, Australia could trade 6,000 apples for New Zealand's 3,000 oranges. 3. Through specialization and trade, the total production of both societies increases. Both countries end up with the same amount of oranges as before, but double the amount of apples, making them both better off.

Uploaded by

jejoullie162
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Question 1.

(5 marks)
Using the same amount of resources, Australia and New Zealand can both produce apples
and oranges as shown in the following table, measured in thousands of tonnes.
Australia

New Zealand
Apples
Oranges
Apples
Oranges
12
0
6
0
3
3
3
3
0
4
0
6
i. Does either country have an absolute advantage in producing both goods? Explain your
answer.
Neither country has an absolute advantage in making both goods:
Aust has the absolute advantage in producing apples (12 thousand apples).
NZ has the absolute advantage in producing oranges (6 thousand oranges).
ii. Who has a comparative advantage in producing apples? Who has a comparative advantage in
producing oranges? Explain your answer.
Aust can produce 12 thousand apples (A) or 4
NZ can produce 6 thousand apples (A) or 6
thousand oranges (R):
thousand oranges (R):
12A = 4R
6A = 6R
1A = 1/3R (Austs OC of an apple is 1/3 orange) 1A = 1R (NZs OC of an apple is one orange)
or
or
1R = 3A (Austs OC of an orange is 3 apples)
1R = 1A (NZs OC of an orange is one apple)
Aust has the comparative advantage in producing apples (Austs opportunity cost of an apple
is a third of an orange, less than NZs 1 orange). NZ has the comparative advantage in
producing oranges (NZs opportunity cost of an orange is one apple, less than Austs 3
apples).
iii. Suppose that both countries are currently producing 3000 tonnes of apples and 3000 tonnes
of oranges. Show that both can be better off if they specialize in producing one good and
then engage in trade. Explain your answer, with the aid of diagrams.
If both countries specialise in the good in which they have a comparative advantage and then
trade with the other, they can both be better off.
Specialisation:
Aust should produce 12 thousand apples (A)

NZ should produce 6 thousand oranges (R)

Comparing OC:
1A = 1/3R
Aust will accept any price above 1/3 orange for
an apple.
Acceptable price:
1A =

1A = 1R
NZ will pay any price less than 1 orange
for an apple.
1/3R < any quantity of oranges < 1R

1R = 3A
Aust will pay any price less than 3 apples for an
orange.
Acceptable price:
1R =

1R = 1A
NZ will accept price above 1 apple for an
orange.
1A < any quantity of apples < 3A

Acceptable ToT: 1A = 1/2R

1R = 2A

Trade: Aust exchanges 6A with 3R.

NZ exchanges 3R with 6A.


Econ111_S1_2012

Gains: Aust gains 3A (compared to their before


trade production of 3A and 3R).

NZ gains 3A (compared to their before


trade production of 3A and 3R).

The society as a whole gains a total of 6 thousand apples. Both countries are better off than
before trading, since they end up with the same amount of oranges, but twice as many
apples. Note that other trades (and terms of trade) will make them better off as well. The
terms of trade (ToT) can fall within the range of the acceptable price of apples and oranges
(see above), which means they are acceptable to both countries. An acceptable trade is
shown below where the two trade lines meet (at 6000 apples and 3000 oranges) in Figure 1.
Oranges('000)

6
5
4

Aust'sPPF
NZ'sPPF
AustTradeLine

3,3

6,3

NZTradeLine
1
0
0

10

12
Apples('000)

Figure 1 PPFs and Trade Lines for Aust and NZ

Econ111_S1_2012

14

You might also like