What's in It For Me? Learn How Persuasion Really Works!: Small Bigs
What's in It For Me? Learn How Persuasion Really Works!: Small Bigs
What's in It For Me? Learn How Persuasion Really Works!: Small Bigs
Learn how
persuasion really works!
We often think that a good message is the only factor that determines whether we win someone
over or not. But since every one of us has different values and opinions, the same message can
have totally different effects, depending on who the receiver is.
In these blinks, youll learn some small tips that will make a big difference in your powers of
persuasion. Whether its at home, at the office, or in your own decision-making, youll find that
the small
More than a crafty tactic, persuasion is important, and lack of it can have costly consequences. For example, as
a society, we lose a lot of money when we dont fulfill our commitments. So persuading others to fulfill their
commitments can be very beneficial.
One industry which suffers as a result of lack of commitment is health-care. A popular phrase in healthcare
DNA, standing for Did Not Attend. This is when we schedule an appointment but dont show up. In the UK
alone, the problem of DNA has accounted for a 800 million loss.
is
Governments and organizations are responsible for collecting funds in a prompt manner. Yet, due to late or
absent payments, governments, organizations
and
Fortunately, even slight changes in the approach can have a surprisingly large effect.
You might think that if we were to offer people detailed information and a rational explanation on the subject, it
would change their behavior. Take turning off the lights in an office, for example: a common approach is to give
your co-workers reasons why its important to switch them off, such as cost efficiency and environmental
friendliness.
But persuasion science studies tell us that these rational methods are likely to fail.
There is a better way to get workers to switch off their lights. Its a
small
big
effect: put
a garbage bin under the light switch. This way, workers will be predisposed to flip the light switch as they throw
out their waste when they leave the office.
much more.
Depending on the situation, certain environments can even influence how responsible we are.
One experiment by Keizer examined this oddity by placing advertisements on customers bikes in front of a
shopping center.
The number of people who threw the advertisements on the ground, instead of putting them in the trash bin
changed depending on whether or not the researchers added graffiti to the alleyway adjacent to the shopping
centre. When there was no graffiti, 33 percent threw the advert on the ground, whereas when
there
was
Another study showing how surroundings influence how we act focussed on creativity in different environments.
Participants were better at solving creative problems in a regular room, as opposed to a room with a low ceiling,
in which participants were found to have completed fewer creative tasks.
Slight changes to seating arrangements can also change the results of discussions. Scientists found that different
seating layouts influenced peoples attention in a discussion. Circular arrangements, for instance, made people
consider more of what would be ideal for their group. In contrast, people seated in angular (such as L-shaped) or
square arrangements, responded more positively to information or proposals that were self-oriented.
Changing the venue itself can also have a significant impact on negotiations.
Much like football games, there is the possibility of a home advantage in places where you negotiate. In one
study, researchers assigned groups that were to negotiate with each other to either a home or visitor status.
Before the negotiation, the home group was allowed to tailor a room (previously a neutral place) to suit them,
such as displaying their names. The researchers observed that groups with the home status outperformed
visitors in the negotiation.
social proof.
small big idea was to include a sentence in the reminder letters distributed by the government,
stating that citizens from the same area were paying their taxes on time. As a result, the response rate to the
letters rose from 67 percent to 79 percent. Even more impressively, when the name of the town was also
included, the response rate rose to 83 percent. So, the more similar to ourselves we perceive others to be, the
stronger the effect of social proof.
Research in neuroscience has also shown that behaving contrary to a crowd consensus incurs emotional costs.
In particular,
fMRI studies have shown that areas in the brain associated with emotion are activated when we
disassociate
students are more likely to stop a certain behavior (such as wearing a special bracelet) when an out-group (in
this case a nerdy student group) also sported the bracelets. There was a 32 percent drop in wearing the
bracelets, in contrast to a mere 6 percent drop when there was no out-group.
So it is important to couple your desired behavior with qualities which most people want to assume for
themselves. Apple uses this small big technique well by accompanying its products with independent, confident
and creative people. Because so many of us want to be perceived this way, we are far more likely to buy their
products!
One way to do so is by noting other peoples mistakes. Rather than emulating what successful entrepreneurs did
to make them successful, focus on what led to their failures.
Charlie Munger, investment advisor to
other companies that led them into some sticky situations. He created a collection of other peoples mistakes
inanities-list.
But isnt this contrary to what weve been told? Dont we learn from positive outcomes? Yet researchers assert
that this is not the case. Professor Roy Baumeister and his colleagues discovered that we actually focus more on
negative information and learn more from it than from positive information.
Its important to manage our own mistakes and we shouldnt necessarily avoid them.
Rather than averting mistakes, organizational scientists found that the
Error Management
model (EMT) is more accurate than the traditional error-avoidance slant, which posits that we should try
to avoid making mistakes whenever we can.
The EMT-model is similar to the
other peoples failures came about. Secondly, it involves analyzing your own mistakes after the fact and
responding appropriately to them.
In the EMT-model, people learn that mistakes are a normal part of learning and so arent categorized as personal
failure.
Interestingly, this model can also improve your customer service. In a study on customer satisfaction, one hotel
chain found that customers who had the chance to experience hotel staff responding to a mistake were more
satisfied and loyal than customers who had an uneventful stay.
Just as our physical environment is key to the art of persuasion, so is the persuader. Some minor changes in how
we portray ourselves can do wonders for communicating our message effectively.
Moreover, if you can convince people that youre an expert, youre already halfway to becoming a master of
persuasion. For example, recent brain-imaging studies illustrate that were more likely to make financial choices
that are otherwise unfamiliar to us when we are advised by an expert, such as a well-known economist.
In these studies, brain areas connected to critical thinking and counter-arguing were almost inactive. The
scientists postulated that the
This is evident in one study where two groups of participants had to attend a job interview. Before the interview,
the first group noted experiences in which they felt powerful and the other group noted experiences in which they
felt powerless.
The result? The first group out-performed the second. Even compared to a control group, who didnt do any
writing, the powerful group was more persuasive.
So, having confidence is ideal, but you shouldnt take it too far.
Researchers found that a review by a well-known food critic was more persuasive when he articulated insecurity,
than when he said he was 100 percent positive that the restaurant was the best.
The researchers explained that we often expect experts to be convinced of their opinion, so when they show
insecurity, it sparks our attention, which results in the message being more persuasive.
Therefore, to be persuasive, we need to be confident and at the same time aware of flaws in ourselves, our
theories or our products.
Often workers dont achieve their full potential because they feel that what they are doing is not significant
enough. When this happens, they start feeling detached from their jobs.
Professor Adam Grant conducted a study in a call center where staff called up college alumni and had to
persuade them to donate money to the college. Prior to calling anyone, one group was asked to read a text by
another employee, highlighting the personal gain (e.g. their wages) the employee gets from doing their job, and
the second group read texts written by students about how their situation had improved from receiving their
scholarship.
The second group received more than double the pledges than the first group. Why? Because the employees,
having seen the meaningfulness of their work, became more motivated to ask for donations and actively
persuade those they were calling.
So what else can increase the chances of getting others to behave how we would like them to? Personal
commitment and
Take the aforementioned DNAs in the healthcare industry: when people had to write down their appointment date
themselves, the DNA rates fell by 18 percent. This improvement is an example of an implementation intention
plan.
Implementation intention plans help us when we want to carry out a certain behavior such as going to the gym
regularly. These plans are an agreement, but dont necessarily have to be written down, and they outline where,
when and how we intend to reach a particular goal.
We can see the effect of this in one study in which households either filled out a voting plan, detailing the time
and location of voting, or didnt fill out any voting plan. Those households who had a plan were more likely than
those who had no plan to actually vote on election day.
anchor
Even if an initial offer is much higher than they were expecting, they will adjust their expected figure accordingly.
Say you work as a car salesperson and your customer is prepared to pay $2000 for one of the cars. But you preempt them and offer $5000 as a benchmark. According to research, your customer will agree to a price tag closer
to $5000 than their expected $2000, due to this
anchor effect.
This phenomenon tells us that customers believe salespeople, who they regard as experts, offer such high figures
because there must be something about the products value that they dont know about.
You could increase your persuasiveness even more if you were to present a precise amount such as $5132 to
your customer. This is because it implies to the customer that a lot of time and effort went into researching the
cars value. So this price seems more accurate and realistic.
If you want to make an offer even
more
Take renowned chef Antonio Carluccio, for example. He decided to introduce an unfamiliar item to his italian
restaurant menu in which, besides the pastas and salads, you could also order a
Vespa scooter.
Although his scooter sales didnt take off, the rest of the menu seemed far more appealing because the other
items were much cheaper than the scooter. This is a phenomenon in psychology known as
perceptual
contrast.
A more down-to-earth way to use this idea would be to add a $60 wine to your menu, along with the $15 wines.
Suddenly the $15 wine will seem far more attractive.
Sometimes we need to give people some time to act the way we want them to.
Lets take a look at short term decisions. When you think about going out for dinner this weekend, for instance,
you think of the
concrete costs of the decision, such as weighing up if you can afford it or not.
Events in the future, however, evoke more abstract thinking. When considering the future, we think how the event
is connected to our own morals and values. Therefore, if everyone we know is attending a particular Christmas
dinner, then we are likely to agree to go, too. If an event fits into our moral values, we are more likely to say yes to
it when its further away in the future.
So how can we apply this technique? Well, for example, if you know that you are going to need help painting your
apartment in a few weeks, ask your friends as early as you can. If they dont yet have definite ideas of what they
are doing on the date you need to paint the apartment, they are more likely to agree to help you.
Note, however, that if something has to be done in a timely manner, don't give people too much time. Its a
mistaken belief that giving people extra time to complete a request or task increases the likelihood that they will
do so.
To test this, researchers in one study altered the expiration date of bakery vouchers and observed how often
customers redeemed them. They found that those who received vouchers with long expiration dates reported
they will likely use them, but they actually redeemed them
Final summary
The key message in this book: