IOM Cartagena
IOM Cartagena
IOM Cartagena
www.diuchirurgiemain.org
La membrana interosea,
anatoma, fisiologa y patologa
Christian Dumontier, MD, PhD
Guadeloupe
With the help of Marc Soubeyrand and Scott Kozin
Anatomy
Anatomy
Composition
Prolongation of the
periosteum of ulna and
radius
Collagen (60-90%) and
elastin in the proximal
and distal part
Central band:
Intermediate structure
between a fascia and a
ligament
Anatomy
Two types of fibers that forms a
crisscross system
Fibers going from the ulna to the
radius and from proximal to distal
Fibers oriented from the ulna to the
radius and from distal to proximal
which are the most important
FIGURE 1. (A)
cadaveric spe
forearm with s
moved down
Note the CB is
area in the cen
tire IOM com
Camacho Garcia FJ et al. Descripcin anatmica de la membrana intersea del antebrazo: estudio
en
courtesy
of La
cadveres. Rev Colomb Ortop Traumatol. 2013;27(3):140-143
MD. (B) Same
Posterior view
1,1 to 2,6 cm
2,7-3,5 cm
57%
7,7 cm
25
13,2 cm
32%
Anterior view
Physiology and
biomechanics of
the interosseous
membrane
EIP
EPL
APL
Transverse instability
The anatomy of the two radioulnar
joint tends to push apart the two
forearm bones and the IOM resists
Ulnar head resection tends to
diminish the interosseous space
between the ulna diaphysis and the
radius (radio-ulnar abutment)
The radial head also has the role of
a spacer
y correct
oduction
eect of
nar joint
erosseous
dierent
forearm
nt in the
ment.
d to ligaforearm
measured
the wrist
ton Hoscurely ata 5 mm
the ulna
pals (Fig.
the ulna,
d on two
vent rota-
Longitudinal stability
Load transfer varies according to:
Frontal inclination of the wrist,
Wrist positioning in flexion or extension,
Forearm rotation
Major displacement
Elbow:
Forearm :
Wrist :
Pronosupination
Proximal
radioulnar
synostosis
Absent
Radial head
resection
Unstable
Radial head
dislocation
DRUJ stiffness
Absent
Ulnar head
resection
Isolated ulnar
Unstable
head dislocation
Middle locker
Locking
Absent
Unstable
Synostosis
IOM lesion or
dyaphysal
fracture
Consequences in clinical
practice
Locking of any of the three lockers
locked all the forearm
Synostosis
IOM retraction in
pronosupination limitation
Consequences
An absent locker can be compensate by
the other two
Consequences
Absence of two lockers cannot be compensate by
the last one
Interosseous
membrane
traumatism
Longitudinal mechanism
Lesions depend of the forearm
rotation
Position
Lesion
Supination
85
Forearm
bones fracture
Supination
45
Radial head
fracture
Supination
15
Complex
radial head
fracture
Neutral
Rotation
Interosseous
Membrane
disruption
Example
Experimentation
McGinley JC et al.
Forearm and Elbow Injury:
The Influence of
Rotational Position JBJS
Am 2003; 85: 2403-2409.
2 MD: Galeazzis
Diagnostic in emergency
Very difficult, no specific signs
Think of it: A lesion of two lockers should make you
suspicious of a possible injury of the third locker
Immediate repair ?
Only some case reported with disappointing results
It seems that the IOM cannot heal or withstand the
mechanical loads
2ary diagnostic
Plain X-rays
Same patient
4 weeks
4 months
Plain X-rays
Direct signs: Axial
compression tests
MRI
PPV : 100% (TP / TP + FP)
NPV : 89% (TN / FN + TN)
Sensibility: 87,5 % (TP / TP + FN)
Specificity: 100 % (FP / FP + TN)
MRI
Hyposignal T1 & T2 - Fat Saturation +++
However: many artifacts in traumatized patients,
especially if plates and screws have been inserted
Sonography
Static: Some authors consider that sensibility and
specificity is almost 100% !
Longitudinal view
Dynamic sonography
Proposed by Soubeyrand
The IOM is divided in three parts
The probe is placed on the
posterior side
One pushes on the anterior
muscles of the forearm
Intact membrane
Proximal RUJ
Radial head
reconstruction with
allograft (5 cases, short
FU)
Prosthetic replacement
(not with silastic)
Distal RUJ
TFCC reconstruction/repair +++
Ulna shortening +/- ulnar head resection (with
resection distal to the ulnar insertion of the central
band of the IOM)
Conclusion
Pathology of the interosseous membrane cannot be
dissociate from pathology of the forearm
The whole forearm is a functional unit
The three lockers concept helps to better
understand the lesions
Conclusion
Interosseous membrane lesions are always
underestimated
Think of it in recent trauma if other lockers are
damaged +++
Dynamic sonography would probably be helpful
The ideal treatment in front of fresh lesion is still
unknown
Conclusion
In chronic lesions, surgical treatments are still
disappointing
Treat first the bony lesions and the proximal and
distal lockers
We propose a original ligamentoplasty which take
into account the mechanical axis of the forearm
Conclusion
There are probably other unknown lesions of the
IOM: Transverse instability, partial rupture, localized
stiffness,...
That you may discover and explore