tmp475B TMP

Microbiology (2006), 152, 19511968
DOI 10.1099/mic.0.28861-0
Two novel conjugative plasmids from a single

strain of Sulfolobus
Gael Erauso,1,2 Kenneth M. Stedman,3,4 Harmen J. G. van de Werken,1
Wolfram Zillig33 and John van der Oost1
1
Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Correspondence
Gael Erauso
UMR CNRS 6539, IUEM, Universite de Bretagne Occidentale, Technopole Brest-Iroise, Place
Copernic, 29280 Plouzane, France
[email protected]
Max-Planck-Institut fur Biochemie, Martinsried, Germany
Biology Department, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207, USA
Two conjugative plasmids (CPs) were isolated and characterized from the same Sulfolobus
islandicus strain, SOG2/4. The plasmids were separated from each other and transferred into
Sulfolobus solfataricus. One has a high copy number and is not stable (pSOG1) whereas the other
has a low copy number and is stably maintained (pSOG2). Plasmid pSOG2 is the first Sulfolobus
CP found to have these characteristics. The genomes of both pSOG plasmids have been
sequenced and were compared to each other and the available Sulfolobus CPs. Interestingly,
apart from a very well-conserved core, 70 % of the pSOG1 and pSOG2 genomes is largely
different and composed of a mixture of genes that often resemble counterparts in previously
described Sulfolobus CPs. However, about 20 % of the predicted genes do not have known
homologues, not even in other CPs. Unlike pSOG1, pSOG2 does not contain a gene for the highly
conserved PlrA protein nor for obvious homologues of partitioning proteins. Unlike pNOB8 and
pKEF9, both pSOG plasmids lack the so-called clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome
repeats (CRISPRs). The sites of recombination between the two genomes can be explained by
the presence of recombination motifs previously identified in other Sulfolobus CPs. Like other
Sulfolobus CPs, the pSOG plasmids possess a gene encoding an integrase of the tyrosine
recombinase family. This integrase probably mediates plasmid site-specific integration into the host
chromosome at the highly conserved tRNAGlu loci.
Received 22 January 2006

Revised
4 March 2006
Accepted 6 March 2006
INTRODUCTION
Sulfolobus solfataricus was one of the first organisms to be
recognized as a member of the Archaea (Zillig et al., 1980).
Due to this early identification, S. solfataricus and its
relatives have become model organisms for fundamental
studies of Archaea. Studies of the genus Sulfolobus have
been instrumental in understanding archaeal mechanisms
of transposition (Martusewitsch et al., 2000), transfection
(Schleper et al., 1992), transformation (Aravalli & Garrett,
1997; Cannio et al., 1998; Elferink et al., 1996; Stedman et al.,
3Deceased.
Abbreviation: CP, conjugative plasmid.
The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the sequences of
the pSOG plasmids are DQ335583 (pSOG1) and DQ335584
(pSOG2).
An alignment of the Sulfolobus CP integrases with representative
members of the tyrosine recombinases is available as supplementary
data with the online version of this paper.
0002-8861 G 2006 SGM
Printed in Great Britain
1999) and conjugation (Reilly & Grogan, 2001; Schleper

et al., 1995). An impressive variety of mobile genetic
elements has recently been discovered in Archaea in general,
and in Sulfolobus in particular: viruses, autonomous insertion sequence (IS) elements, non-autonomous miniature
inverted repeat transposable elements (MITEs), small nonconjugative plasmids and large conjugative plasmids
(Brugger et al., 2002; Prangishvili et al., 2001; Rice et al.,
2001; Zillig et al., 1998). Although there have been impressive recent developments in Sulfolobus genetics, this remains
a bottleneck (Albers et al., 2006; Bartolucci et al., 2003;
Jonuscheit et al., 2003; Stedman et al., 1999; Worthington
et al., 2003).
The first archaeal conjugative plasmid (CP), pNOB8, was
isolated from a Japanese Sulfolobus isolate (Schleper et al.,
1995). Since then, several other CPs have been isolated from
colony-cloned strains of Sulfolobus islandicus, and subsequently characterized (Greve et al., 2004; Stedman et al.,
2000). Sequence comparison of all Sulfolobus CPs revealed
three distinct sequence domains. One well-conserved cluster
1951
G. Erauso and others
of genes covering approximately 12 kbp of the plasmids

genomes apparently contains the conjugative functions. A
second is the putative origin of replication. Finally there is a
region proposed to encode replication proteins (Greve et al.,
2004). Only a few distant homologues to bacterial proteins
involved in conjugative transfer (TraG, TrbE) and partitioning (ParA, ParB) have been found. In the case of the
pNOB8 and pING plasmids, derived variant plasmids were
detected upon propagation. These occur as a result of
deletion and recombination (She et al., 1998; Stedman et al.,
2000). Comparing the conserved sequences of CPs with
some non-conjugative derivatives has provided insight into
proteins and DNA sequence motifs putatively involved in
conjugation in Archaea.
A single strain of S. islandicus SOG2/4 was found to
harbour two very different but related plasmids. One of
these had a stable low copy number in the well-characterized
S. solfataricus P1 strain, so it was of interest for the development of genetic tools. The two plasmids were separated and
characterized. Here we present the complete sequences of
these two archaeal CPs (pSOG1 and pSOG2). Comparison
of these novel CPs with the available counterparts has been
used to further identify plasmid features that play key roles
in conjugative transfer in Archaea.
METHODS
Sulfolobus growth, DNA isolation and analysis. Single-colony
isolates of strains containing the pSOG plasmids were obtained

and grown in standard Sulfolobus medium as described previously
(Zillig et al., 1994). Plasmid DNAs were prepared from 4 litres of
freshly conjugated cells (1 : 10 000 donor to recipient followed by
growth for 48 h) by using a variation of the alkaline lysis method
of Birboim & Doly (1979) as described previously (Arnold et al.,
1999). Total DNA, i.e. chromosomal plus plasmid DNA, was isolated as described by Arnold et al. (1999). For electrophoretic analysis, about 3 mg total DNA or 1 mg plasmid DNA was digested
with the appropriate restriction enzyme and separated on 0?61?0 %
agarose gels (Sambrook et al., 1989). Southern hybridizations were
performed by using the DIG labelling and detection kit from Roche
Diagnostics, according to the manufacturers instructions. The copy
number of the pSOG plasmids was determined by estimation of the
ratio of single-copy chromosomal fragments to plasmid fragments
in restriction digests of total DNA as described previously (Schleper
et al., 1995).
Cloning and sequencing. Prior to cloning, plasmid DNA preparations were purified by ultracentrifugation in a caesium chloride gradient in the presence of ethidium bromide (1 mg ml21) (Sambrook
et al., 1989). Digestion of both plasmids with EcoRI produced 11
bands for pSOG1 and 10 bands for pSOG2, ranging from 0?3 to
7?2 kbp. All of these fragments were cloned in the EcoRI site of
pUC28 (Benes et al., 1993). Fragments obtained by digestion with
BamHI, HindIII, PstI and XbaI in the size range 0?84?5 kb were
also cloned in the corresponding sites of pUC28 to obtain an overlapping clone library for pSOG1 and pSOG2. Sequencing reactions
were carried out on a LiCor DNA sequencer 4000L with a Thermo
Sequenase fluorescent-labelled primer cycle sequencing kit (Amersham Biosciences) and infrared-labelled primers M13 forward and
M13 reverse (MWG-Biotech). Gaps in the sequence were filled by
using specific primers either directly for sequencing on library
clones or to sequence PCR amplicons obtained with native pSOG
1952
DNA as template. The sequences were trimmed and assembled using

the SeqMan II program (Lasergene package), with both strands
completely sequenced and with a minimum threefold coverage.
Computer analysis. DNA sequences were analysed using Vector
NTI software (version 9, Informax). Direct and inverted sequence

repeats were detected by using the GeneQuest program (Lasergene).
Cumulative GC skews were made with the Genskew software (http://
mips.gsf.de/services/analysis/genskew) and the Z-curve program
(http://tubic.tju.edu.cn/zcurve/). Analyses were done with a window
size of 30 nt. Identification of putative genes and operons was performed using the FGENESB pattern/Markov chain-based prediction
program from Softberry (http://softberry.com/berry.phtml) and the
pre-trained parameters of Sulfolobus solfataricus and S. tokodaii.
Putative promoters (TATA box), ShineDalgarno sequences and
terminators were identified with a window size of 12, 6 and 11 nt,
respectively, in the 50 nt sequences upstream or downstream of the
predicted gene start and stop codon. The nucleotide sequences
were analysed using the Gibbs sampler algorithm (Thompson et al.,
2003). Sequence logos were generated using WebLogo (Crooks et al.,
2004). Homology searches were performed with a range of BLAST
tools at the NCBI server (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast).
Identities were calculated with the program LALIGN at the Swiss
EMBnet node server (http://www.ch.embnet.org/. Combined searches
of a number of databases of protein families, domains and functional
sites were performed using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/)
and CDD tool (NCBI). The program COILS (EMBnet) was used for
finding a-helical coiled-coil domains. Transmembrane domains
were predicted by the programs PSORT (http://psort.nibb.ac.jp/),
TMPRED (EMBnet) and TMHMM (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/
TMHMM). Identification of potential signal peptides was done with
SIGNALP (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP). For phylogenetic
analyses, the deduced amino-acid sequences of the largest conserved
ORFs in each Sulfolobus CP were aligned using MUSCLE (Edgar,
2004) and revised manually. Trees were generated from each individual alignment and for concatenated alignments of several ORFs,
using the neighbour-joining method (Saitou & Nei, 1987) of the
MEGA 3.1 program (Kumar et al., 2004). Distances were calculated
using the Poisson correction (PC) distance model (Nei & Kumar,
2000). Tree significance was assessed by bootstrapping 1000 times.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Origin of the pSOG2/4 plasmids
Strain SOG2/4 harbouring the conjugative plasmid (CP)
pSOG2/4 was isolated from samples collected in the Sogasel
Icelandic solfataric field and belongs to a species provisionally called Sulfolobus islandicus, closely related to S.
solfataricus (Zillig et al., 1994). The conjugative nature of
this plasmid was shown by its capacity to be directly transferred from donor into recipient cells, resulting in complete
spread through the recipient culture (Prangishvili et al.,
1998). Upon conjugation into a foreign host the plasmid was
amplified to high copy number (more than 35 copies per
chromosome), as observed for the other Sulfolobus CPs.
Unlike other Sulfolobus CPs, which were mostly stable
immediately after conjugation, the plasmid from SOG2/4
appeared to be very unstable when transferred into S.
solfataricus strain P1 but remained indistinguishable from
the original when another S. islandicus strain, HVE10/4,
was the recipient (Prangishvili et al., 1998) (Fig. 1).
However in the former case, as often observed for other
Microbiology 152
The pSOG conjugative plasmids
Fig. 1. Generation of plasmids pSOG1 and

pSOG2. Plasmid hosts are shown as large
ovals. Plasmids are shown as circles; a
dashed-lined circle indicates plasmid loss.
Black arrows represent plasmid transfer by
conjugation. The broad white arrow represents single colony isolation. lc indicates
low copy number; hc indicates high copy
number; vlc indicates very low copy number, which may be an integrated copy.
pSOG1 is the precursor of the plasmid
pSOG1, which contains putative conjugation
genes and origin of the pKEF family of
Sulfolobus CPs. pSOG2/4 is the originally
observed plasmid and precursor of plasmid
pSOG2.
Sulfolobus CPs, prolonged growth of transcipients resulted

in plasmid variant formation and eventual curing (Schleper
et al., 1995; She et al., 1998). Plasmid pSOG1 (previously
named pSOG2/4 clone 1; Prangishvili et al., 1998) was isolated from a single colony obtained by plating transcipient
cultures from a third successive conjugative transfer in S.
solfataricus strain P1 (Prangishvili et al., 1998). A stable
clone, named pSOG2 (previously named pSOG2/4 clone
A), was obtained by conjugative transfer first in strain
HVE10/4 and subsequentely in S. solfataricus P1; pSOG2
appeared to be indistinguishable by restriction endonuclease
digestion from the original pSOG2/4 CP. See Fig. 1 for an
overview of the isolation procedure. Comparison of the
restriction endonuclease digestion patterns and Southern
blotting of pSOG1 and pSOG2 showed that the two plasmids differ dramatically (not shown; and see Prangishvili
et al., 1998). Only 1/3 of the sequence of pSOG2 is conserved in pSOG1 (Fig. 2). The rest of the pSOG1 genome
was likely acquired via recombination from another lowcopy-number plasmid in the parent strain SOG2/4 that
was lost upon passage through the S. islandicus HVE10/4
strain. The pSOG1 plasmid must have been present in the
original strain at very low copy number because it was not
detected by Southern blotting that detected low-copynumber plasmids. After long exposures, background hybridization to genomic DNA was detected that may indicate an
integrated plasmid (not shown). After passage, pSOG2 can
be stably propagated in S. solfataricus P1. Copy number
control appeared to be lost or damaged in the pSOG1
variant, as indicated by its extremely high copy number in S.
solfataricus P1 as compared to the low copy number of
pSOG2.
Nucleotide sequence of the pSOG1 and pSOG2
plasmids
The assembled circular sequences are 29 000 bp in length
for pSOG1 and 26 960 bp for pSOG2 (Fig. 2). Their overall G+C contents were 35?8 mol% and 36?7 mol%
http://mic.sgmjournals.org
respectively. The corresponding value for the chromosome

of S. islandicus is not known but the value determined for
S. solfataricus (35?8 %) (She et al., 2001) is identical to that
of pSOG1. As previously deduced from their EcoRI restriction patterns and Southern hybridizations, the two genomes
share a large 100 % identical region of 9842 bp (nucleotides
14 69621 466 and 24 21727 129 for pSOG1, 15 81525 657
for pSOG2). This region in pSOG1 is interrupted by a nonhomologous sequence of 2756 bp. As expected from previous studies (Greve et al., 2004; Stedman et al., 2000),
pSOG2 shares extensive nucleotide sequence similarity
(long stretches of sequences up to ~3 kbp with more
than 95 % identity) with other Sulfolobus CPs of the pKEF
group (nomenclature according to Greve et al., 2004),
whereas pSOG1 has more similarities with the pARN group
of plasmids, which also contains plasmids integrated into
the genomes of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius and S. tokodaii
(Chen et al., 2005; She et al., 2004).
The G+C content of pSOG CPs is not evenly distributed,
displaying a number of peaks and troughs (not shown). Five
regions of more than 2000 bp have a higher G+C content
(>36 mol%); these fragments roughly correspond to parts
of the genome that encode the most-conserved ORFs in
Sulfolobus CPs (Fig. 2, Table 1). In contrast, lower G+C
regions are less extended and contain less-conserved ORFs.
The latter fragments may encode functional units, such as
partitioning and additional elements involved in conjugation (see below), also indicating that pSOG2/4 plasmids have
a mosaic structure composed of elements of diverse origin. A
clear minimum, corresponding to several successive short
poly(A) stretches, is located just in front of ORF175, present
in both plasmids (ORFs present in only one plasmid are
listed as ORF1- for pSOG1 and ORF2- for pSOG2).
ORF distribution
Forty-six ORFs encoding a product at least 50 aa in length
were identified in the genome of pSOG1 and 41 ORFs
1953
Fig. 2. Comparison of the pSOG1 and pSOG2 sequences. This diagram shows the circular genomes of pSOG1 on the
outside and pSOG2 on the inside. ORFs are shown as arrows. Similar ORFs in the two plasmids are filled in grey; identical
ORFs are filled in black; ORFs not conserved between the two plasmids are not filled. ORFs with predicted functions
are labelled and ORFs discussed in the text are in bold. Insertions and gene replacements are indicated by dashed lines
between the two genomes. ORF names are shown next to the corresponding arrows. The recombination motif
TAAACTGGGGAGTTTA is represented by a small disk, coloured green when present on the direct DNA strand and
light blue when located on the complementary strand. Blue disks indicate the two larger tandem repeats, and a red disk
indicates larger inverted repeats. The violet oval represents the putative site of integration attP. The approximate location of
the origin (Ori) and terminus (Ter) of replication as predicted by cumulative GC skew and Z-curve analyses are also
indicated.
in the genome of pSOG2 (Fig. 2, Table 1). These putative genes are generally closely spaced (mean density 1?55
ORFs per kb). However, two regions with larger intergenic spaces are located at the borders between the
conserved and the variable regions of the two pSOG
plasmids: between ORFs 1-76 and ORF87 and from ORF87
to ORF175a on one side, and between 1-68a and 1-125c
on the other side. The putative genes are almost equally
1954
distributed on both DNA strands and apart from a few

clusters of genes that are probably co-transcribed (see
below) the genes are evenly dispersed. This ORF distribution is also observed for the other Sulfolobus CPs (Greve
et al., 2004) (see below). Another common feature of the
plasmids is that all of the larger ORFs (encoding >500 aa)
are located in the same conserved region of their genome
(Fig. 2, Fig. 4).
Microbiology 152
Operons and putative transcriptional and

translational signals
The pSOG plasmid ORFs start at ATG (79?5 %), TTG
(17?5 %) or GTG (3 %) and terminate at TAA (44 %), TGA
(39 %) or TAG (17 %). This distribution of start and stop
codons resembles that of the S. solfataricus chromosome
(Garcia-Vallve et al., 2003). Except for the above-mentioned
two regions containing larger intergenic sequences, in 83 %
of the cases an ORF is found within 50 nt of the previous
ORFs stop codon. Moreover, for 31 % of the collinear ORFs
this distance is less than 20 nt (75 % of these overlap), and
the latter have been considered to be part of an operon.
Sequence logos derived from alignment of the 50 nt
upstream sequences of pSOG genes allowed us to identify
putative translational and transcriptional signals (Fig. 3).
The consensus ribosome-binding site (GGTGA) was found
in all but a few genes that are assumed to be part of an
operon (Table 1, Fig. 3). It is optimally located at positions
210 to 27 bp upstream of the putative start codon. This
sequence is the reverse complement of (underlined) part of
the 39 end of the 16S rRNA sequence from S. solfataricus
(GGAUCACCUCA-39). However, such a sequence was not
detected for single genes or first genes of a candidate operon,
confirming the results of previous analyses done on Sulfolobus (Tolstrup et al., 2000) and later on a large set of
archaeal genomes (Torarinsson et al., 2005). Accordingly,
for this class of genes, we also found a 78 nt A+T-rich
sequence centred between positions 225 and 227 from
the start codon, fulfilling the criteria for the Sulfolobus
TATA box of Soppa (1999). The promoter sequences of
S. solfataricus generally contain a transcription factor B
responsive element (BRE) with two to four A(T)s generally
located 2 nt upstream of the TATA box sequence (Bell &
Jackson, 2000); such a conserved BRE could generally be
identified in both pSOG plasmids (Table 1, Fig. 3). The
distance between the predicted TATA boxes and the putative start codon coincides with the mean interval found
experimentally between the TATA box and the transcriptional start in mapped Sulfolobus promoters (Dalgaard &
Garrett, 1993; Reiter et al., 1988). This means that there is
little or no room for a ribosome-binding site and explains
why this signal was not found in our analysis of single genes
and first genes of an operon. It also implies that translation
initiation for this class of genes must depend on a mechanism other than ShineDalgarno sequence (Condo et al.,
1999). Table 1 summarizes the information obtained from
transcriptional and translational signal searches: pSOG
plasmids appear to be organized in 30 transcription units
(TU) for pSOG1 (5 operons and 25 single genes) and 26 TU
(6 operons and 20 single genes) for pSOG2. Additional
support for the co-transcription of the proposed TUs is
provided by the identification, downstream of the last
gene of the TU, of potential transcriptional terminators
identical to those found in the virus SSV1 (Palm et al., 1991)
and in the Sulfolobus chromosome (She et al., 2001) e.g.
59-TTTTTT or 59-TTTTCTT or 59-TTTATTTT. The fraction of single genes (69 %) is quite high compared to that
found in other Sulfolobus extrachromosomal elements (e.g.

27 % for the genome of virus SSV1; Palm et al., 1991). This
mosaic character may reflect the need for fine-turning each
gene expression separately and/or the modularity of these
plasmids.
Overall genome comparison with the other
Sulfolobus CPs
Similarity searches showed that 53 of the 65 unique ORFs
(80 %) of pSOG1 and pSOG2 had significant matches
(BLASTP E-value <1024) to proteins in public databases.
Most of the hits were to hypothetical proteins encoded
by other Sulfolobus CPs, showing from 26 % and up to
100 % amino acid sequence identity (Table 1). Ten homologous ORFs are shared by the eight CPs, while over 80 %
of the other ORFs are common to two or more CPs. As
illustrated in Fig. 4, the conserved ORFs are clustered in two
genomic regions separated by a larger intergenic section.
These three genomic sections, named A, B and C according
to Greve et al. (2004), appear to be functionally distinct. The
largest one, section A, also contains the highly conserved
large ORFs: 1-668 (TrbE), 1-609, 1-734 and 1-1063 (TraG)
(pSOG1 numbering) which are most likely involved in conjugation. Section B carries the putative origin of replication.
Section C corresponds to a cluster of closely packed genes,
including the six other genes common to all CPs: a putative
relaxase (211), an operon containing genes implicated in
plasmid replication, 106 (RepA), 62 (CopG), 421(integrase),
84 and 93b (two hypothetical proteins). The sequence of an
apparently defective CP, pTC, from Sulfolobus tengchongensis (Xiang et al., 2003) has been deposited in GenBank
(NC_005969). It is missing a number of conserved ORFs
from the other CPs, specifically a homologue of the highly
conserved pSOG ORF2-779 (which appeared to be partitioned in three ORFs) and putative replication ORFs including all of sections B and C (Fig. 4). We are looking forward
to publication of details on its isolation and physical
characteristics.
To better evaluate the relationship between the eight selftransmissible plasmids of Sulfolobus, we used the most
representative genes as phylogenetic markers. Unrooted
trees were obtained from alignment of the eight homologous genes for each of the four largest ORFs of section
A, namely TrbE, 2-779, 2-610 and TraG, and for a concatenated alignment of these four genes. The topology
obtained for each individual gene (not shown) was very
similar to that obtained for the concatenated tree (Fig. 5a)
and not dependent on the method used for tree construction (neighbour joining, minimal evolution, parsimony).
The concatenated tree clearly shows two distinct groups:
(i) the pKEF9 group (Greve et al., 2004), which includes
pSOG2 and the more divergent pNOB8 branch, and (ii) the
pARN group, to which pSOG1 may belong. However, this
clustering does not agree with the integrase tree, where
pARN, pHVE and pKEF appear closely related whilst the
pING integrase is the most divergent. This difference in
tree topology suggests a distinct origin for the respective
1955
ORFs in pSOG1 and/or pSOG2

NameD
Promoter motifd
SD motifd
Closest relatives
Terminator motifd
1-668 ()
ACCCTGTTTATAA* (17)
(+1) TTATTTT
1-85
1-183 ()
1-609
1-170
1-734
GATTTATTTATAA (23)
ACCAATTTATTTTA (23)
AATTAAAATAAA (39)
(+26) TTTTTTCTT
(+4) CCTTTTTTCT
GGAGGTTTAATTTA (25)
tAGGTat (10)
(+6) TTTTTC
(+9) TTTTTATTT
1-109a
1-125a ()
AAAATATTTTTAT (25)
AATTTGATTATTA (21)
(+23) TTGTTTTT
(+2) TTTTTTCTT
1-196
1-82
ATATTTTATAAA (23)
cAGGTGA (9)
1-1063
CTCCCATTTTTATA (24)
1-153 ()
1-76
87 ()
GGGTTTTTAAATA (28)
AAATATTTAAAAA (40)
TTATACTTTATATA (25)
ORF-Plasmid
Family, Domains, Motifs
Predicted function
Identity
(%)||
624-pARN3
27
187-pARN3
660-pARN3
33
48
458-pTC507
487-SAC3
507-pARN3
26
29
26
(+6) TTTTTTCTT
86a-pSOG2
30
(+1) TTTTTTCCTT
1092-pHVE14
38
GAGGTtA (4)
(+12) TTTTAATTTT
(+5) TTTTCT
Not found
153a-pING1
69-pARN3
87-pSOG2
99-pARN3
93
75
85
65
175a ()
GgGGgGt (5)
(+31) CCTTTTTT
188-SAC3
49
211 ()
GgGGgGA (3)
200-pST2 (ST2505)
253-pNOB8
109-pARN3
64
50
83
89
COG3451: VirB4, TrbE; COG0433:

ATPases; pfam01935: unknown
TM (1), SP? mbc
Conjugation (mpf)
TM (2), SP, im
TM (1), SP, mbp
COG1196: Smc, ATPases.
Chromosome segregation
TM (9), SP, im; COG0477:
permeases of the major
facilitator superfamily
TM (1), SP, im
TM (3), SP, im
Conjugation (mpf)
TM (1), SP, mbp
Microbiology 152
93a ()
AAATAGATTTATA (25)
100
TATGTTCATTATAT (23)
(+13) TTTTTCTT
132-pST2 (ST1340)
56 ()
146 ()
65a ()
AGTCCACTATTTAT (25)
AATTGGAAAAAAA (33)
AAATATATAAA (58)
(+12) TTTTT
(+1) TTTTC
100-pHVE14
56-pARN3
146-pARN3
65-pHVE14
99
100
97
100
113
112
52
AAAAGATTTATA (33)
GAGGTGA (7)
GAGGTGA (6)
102-pHVE14
79-SIFV (SIFV0017)
52-pHVE14
90
40
100
pfam02534: TraG/TraD family;

COG3505: VirD4; COG1674:
FtsK/SpoIIIE DNA segregation
ATPase
Conjugation (coupling
protein)
TM (1), SP, im
TrmB family (pfam 01978)

wHTH transcription regulator
pfam 00135: carboxyl-esterases
Transcription regulation?
COG4742: transcriptional regulator
Transcriptional regulation
COG1846.1 and pfam1047: MarR

family; wHTH
Transcription regulation
Mobilization?
Replication
Replication
Replication
1956
Table 1. Properties of ORFs and operons of plasmids pSOG1 and pSOG2
Table 1. cont.
NameD
Promoter motifd
65b
73
106
62
84
93b
SD motifd
GAGGTGg (4)
GGGcTGA (3)
GgtGTGA (5)
GAGGaGg (4)
aGGGTGc (7)
GgGGTGA (5)
Closest relatives
Terminator motifd
ORF-Plasmid

Identity
(%)||
Not found
D-63 SSV1
70-pHVE14
107-pHVE14
62-pARN3
87-pKEF9
109-pARN3
42
86
92
77
85
83
421 ()
AAGGATATTTTT (37)
(+5) TTTCCTT
419-pKEF9
63
1-125b ()
1-78 ()
ctGGgGA (9)
(+43) TTTTCT
AACCTATTAAA (24)
128-pARN3
77-pARN3 (PlrA)
90
98
1-55
1-159 ()
CAAGCGTTAAA (38)
GGGCATTTATA (27)
(+10) TTCCTTT
(+17) TTCCTT
1-116
1-349
AGAATATATTA (35)
agGGTGA (6)
288
atGGTGA (4)
165
68a
caaGtGG (5)
Not found
ATTTTTTAAA* (14)
ATGATTATATAA (27)
AGGGTTTTAAAAA (23)
TGATATTTATAA (23)
ATTATTTTTTATAT (20)
AAGAGTTTGATAT (23)
ATAGTATTTAA (24))
2-307
GGAGTATTTAAA (27)
GAGAGTATTTAAA (29)
tAGGTGg (6)
GAGGaGA (1)
2-779
2-86a
2-103
CopG family
pfam: DUF904, leucine-zipper
Replication
Replication
Replication
Copy number control
Replication
Replication
pfam 00589 and COG4974:

phage-tyrosine integrase (C-term.
half); HTH-XRE: phage repressor
family (N-term.)
Integration
pfam 05584: Sulfolobus plasmids

regulatory protein
Transcription regulation
COG1846.1: MarR family; wHTH

76-SIFV
(290) SpoJ Bacillus
cereus
(284) Chloroflexus
aurantiacus
40
35
(+33) TTTTCT
75-pKEF9
84
(+1) TTTTC
(+2) TTTTCTT
126-pKEF9
68-pKEF9
63-pARN3
82
75
65
630a-pNOB8
91
312-pNOB8
88
781-pKEF9
86-pHVE14
106-pHVE14
82
79
77
96
TM (1), mbc
ParB family (N-term.), DUF1130
(C-term.)
Conserved hypothetical
Partition
TM (1), im
(+3) TCTATTTCT
(+13) TTTTTT
(+1) TTGTTTTTT
(+3) TTTTTCTTC
(+1) CTTTTTTC
(+36) TTTTTTT
TM (2), SP, im
TM (3), SP, im
COG3451: VirB4, TrbE; COG0433:
ATPases; pfam01935: unknown
TM (1), SP? mbc
TM (1), mbp; CC (3) Smc motor
protein
TM (1), SP, mbp
TM (2), SP, im
Conjugation (mpf)
DNA mobility Conjugation?

Partition?
Conjugation (mpf)
1957
125c
68b ()
1-63 ()
1-274
1-88 ()
1-175b
2-615 ()
Predicted function

NameD
Promoter motifd
SD motifd
2-148 ()
2-52a
2-611
TTCTTTGTATATAA (22)
TTATATTTATTA (26)
TTTTTATTTTAA (23)
2-163 ()
AAAAGGTTTAAA (23)
2-85
2-1094
GGTTATTTAAA (20)
2-150 ()
AGAGGTTTTTAAA (27)
2-87
2-141
2-84a
2-54
2-118 ()
2-61
2-53
ATATATTATAAA* (16)
GCTAAATAATAAA (26)
GATATTAAATAAA (29)
TATTTTCTTATAT (27)
AATAATTTAAA (35)
AGGTAAGACAATA (23)
ACGCTTTCAAA (40)
Closest relatives
Terminator motifd
94
96
65
(+24) TCTTAATTTGATTTTTTA
165-pNOB8
84
GcGGTGA (7)
(+25) TTTTTCT
1084-pKEF9
81
(+55) TTTTTTAT
150-pST2
153b-pING1
99-pARN3
72-pARN3
55
34
59
77
120-pST2- (ST1333)
61-pHVE14
83
75
(+22) TTCTTTTTT
(+5) TTTGT
(+14) TTTTTTT
Not found
(+14) TTTTTTTATT
(+1) TTTgcTT
Predicted function
Identity
(%)||
150-pHVE14
52-pING1
604a-pNOB8
(+26) TTTTT
ORF-Plasmid
COG1196: Smc, ATPases

chromosome segregation, TM (10),
SP, im; COG0477: permeases of the
major facilitator superfamily
TM (1), SP
TM (2), SP, im
pfam02534: TraG/TraD family;
COG3505: VirD4; COG1674: FtsK/
SpoIIIE DNA segregation ATPase
Conjugation (mpf)
Conjugation (coupling
protein)
TM (1), SP, mbp

TM (1), SP, im
(+20) TTTTTCT
Microbiology 152
DThe name of the predicted ORFs starts with 1- for those which are unique to pSOG1 and with 2- for those unique to pSOG2, followed by their size of their product in amino acids; (-)
indicates not found. All listed ORFs were predicted by FGENESB except those marked by the symbol . Putative TATA-like promoter motifs, ShineDalgarno (SD) motifs and T-rich terminator
sequences are shown; nucleotides which fit to the canonical TATA motif are in bold. * Indicates a putative TATA box located too close or too far from the translation start. Putative operons are
indicated by a vertical bar on the left of the corresponding ORF names.
dNumbers in parentheses indicate the position of the last nucleotide of the promoter and SD sequences, and the first nucleotide of the terminator sequence, relative to the predicted start or stop
codon, respectively.
Homologous ORFs in other CPs from S. islandicus (pING1, pARN3, pKEF9, pHVE14), S. japonicus (pNOB8), S. tengchongensis (pTC), or in integrated conjugative elements of S. tokodaii
(pST2) and S. acidocaldarius (SAC3).
||Percentage of amino acid identity calculated after a pairwise global alignment produced by the program ALIGN when possible or by local alignement (PSI-BLAST).
HTH, helixturnhelix motif; wHTH, winged helixturnhelix; TM (n), n transmembrane segments; SP, signal peptide; im, integral membrane protein; mbc, membrane-bound cytoplasmic;
mbp, membrane-bound periplasmic; CC, coiled-coiled domain. Databases used: COG, cluster of orthologous genes; pfam, protein family; DUF, domain of unknown function, which may
concern either the N-terminal (N-term.) or the C-terminal (C-term.) part of the predicted protein.
1958
Table 1. cont.
(a) pSOG promoter region
Bits
TATA
(b) pSOG RBS
0
5'
3'
Bits
7
Bits
0
5'
3'
(c) Terminator pSOG
5'
_40
_39
_38
_37
_36
_35
_34
_33
_32
_31
_30
_29
_28
_27
_26
_25
_24
_23
_22
_21
_20
_19
_18
_17
_16
_15
_14
_13
_12
_11
_10
_9
_8
_7
_6
_5
_4
_3
_2
_1
BRE
3'
Fig. 3. Sequence logos of putative promoters, ribosome-binding sites (RBS) and terminators of pSOG plasmids. (a)
Upstream pattern sequence of single genes and putative first genes of an operon (46 sites); the approximate locations of the
BRE motif and TATA box are indicated by horizontal bars. (b) Putative ribosome-binding site of genes within an operon (22
sites). (c) Putative terminator pattern (46 sites).
Fig. 4. Comparison between pSOG1 and pSOG2 and other Sulfolobus CPs. Genome maps are shown for all of the
published Sulfolobus CPs and for the presumed defective plasmid pTC (see text for details). Homologous ORFs in different
plasmids can be identified by colour and pattern. ORFs represented by white arrows have no homologues in the other
Sulfolobus CPs. Predicted regions encoding conjugative functions are shown as region A, the putative replication origin in
region B is delimited by a short red horizontal bar and the putative replication region is labelled C (figure modified from Greve
et al., 2004 with permission). ORFs discussed in the text are labelled.
1959
Fig. 5. Phylogenetic relationships between

large conserved ORFs of Sulfolobus CPs.
(a) Unrooted tree obtained from an alignment of the concatenated four most conserved ORFs of Sulfolobus CPs, presumably
involved in conjugation: TrbE, TraG, ORF734
and ORF609 (pSOG1 numbering). (b)
Unrooted tree of the integrase gene of
Sulfolobus CPs. Trees were constructed
using the neighbour-joining method in MEGA
3.1 (Kumar et al., 2004). Branches are
labelled with their corresponding bootstrap
values (only those greater than 50 % are
indicated).
genomic fragments coinciding with their functional modularity, section A being devoted to conjugation and section
C to replication and recombination.
Conjugative transfer function
At least three of the largest ORFs in the pSOG CPs are
probably involved in the conjugation process. As previously
reported for their homologues in other Sulfolobus CPs
(Greve et al., 2004; She et al., 1998; Stedman et al., 2000),
ORFs 1-1023/2-1082 showed significant similarities with the
TraG/VirD4 [cluster of orthologous groups (COG) 3505],
and ORFs 1-668/2-615 with TrbE/VirB4 (COG 0433). Both
TraG and TrbE represent families of ATPases that are
involved in conjugation in bacteria (http://www.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/COG/) (Grohmann et al., 2003). These two proteins
aligned with each other around the type I ATP-binding site
(Walker A motif), which occurs at a similar position in
each protein (not shown). The TraG and TrbE proteins have
been proposed to be coupling proteins (Grohmann et al.,
2003) connecting the relaxosome, a DNA-binding proteincomplex encoded by both the CP and the host chromosome
at the plasmid transfer origin oriT (Lanka & Wilkins, 1995),
to the mating-pair formation (mpf) system, a plasmidencoded multi-protein complex that is involved in the
transfer of the donor DNA to the recipient cell (Llosa et al.,
2003). In the current model, TraG is a membrane-anchored,
multimeric protein forming a pore-like structure that actively exports the transferred DNA (T-DNA) via envelopespanning mpf components (Llosa et al., 2002, 2003; Llosa &
de la Cruz, 2005; Schroder et al., 2002). Accordingly, we
found that both TraG-like ORFs 1023/1082 and TrbE-like
ORFs 668/615 possess a predicted N-terminal transmembrane domain that could serve as an anchor. They also have
1960
the same predicted topology as their bacterial homologues

(Schroder & Lanka, 2003). A third large ORF in the pSOG
plasmids is also highly conserved in other Sulfolobus CPs
(Table 1). These ORFs 1-734 and 2-610 share significant
similarities with permeases of the major facilitator superfamily (PSI BLAST with E-value 10247 after 5th iteration). Its
product possesses up to 12 putative transmembrane segments covering two-thirds of the protein sequence. It also
contains a type I ATP-binding site located roughly in the
same region as the TraG-like and TrbE-like ORFs. This
motif is part of a conserved domain (COG1196) typical of
motor ATPases, including the Smc proteins, involved in
chromosome segregation or compaction (Elie et al., 1997).
By analogy with the model recently proposed for bacteria
(Grahn et al., 2000), we assume that in Sulfolobus conjugation, the TraG-like and the TrbE-like proteins form a
heteromultimeric complex associated with the cytoplasmic
membrane, and pump the DNA through a membranespanning channel constituted of at least the permease-like
component, which may contribute actively to the T-DNA
translocation. Several other pSOG ORFs, including the
fourth largest, 1-609 and 2-615, contain putative membrane
helices with predicted inner and outer segments (Table 1),
and may also be involved in mating pair formation (mpf). In
bacterial CPs, genes encoding conjugative transfer functions
are generally clustered in one or two tra regions (Grohmann
et al., 2003; Pansegrau et al., 1994), one encoding the
relaxosome and the other the mpf system. The remarkable
conservation of the almost contiguous cluster of ORFs
(including the putative TraG, TrbE, ORFs 1-734/2-610 and
1-609/2-615) in all the Sulfolobus CPs suggests that these
genes are involved in the same function, probably the mpf
system.
Microbiology 152
Homology searches failed to detect putative components of

the relaxosome in the pSOG sequences. Previous comparison of the genome sequence of functionally defective pING
variants that had lost their capacity for self-transfer but
were still transmissible led to the proposal that some of the
conserved ORFs encode mobilization (mob) functions
(Stedman et al., 2000). Among the four candidate mob
genes only one, ORF211, is present in all self-transmissible
plasmids of Sulfolobus CPs (Fig. 4). It is therefore tempting to speculate that, as in bacteria (Francia et al., 2004),
archaeal mobile DNA elements carry the information
necessary for relaxosome formation. The small pING plasmids of Sulfolobus should contain a gene encoding a
functional analogue of the bacterial relaxases as well as a
cis-acting transfer origin (oriT). Previous attempts to locate
oriT in Sulfolobus CPs showed that six conserved sequence
motifs could potentially play that role (Stedman et al., 2000).
We found that only one of these sequence elements (motif
2) is conserved in the pSOG plasmids and generally in the
Sulfolobus CPs of the pKEF9 family (but not in the pARN
plasmids), as well as in mobilizable pING derivatives, and
that this motif is always located immediately upstream of
ORF211. In a typical bacterial mobilization region, oriT is
located upstream of the gene encoding the relaxase (Francia
et al., 2004). The genomic context suggests a hypothetical
function of relaxase for ORF211. However, the lack of any
detectable sequence similarities with bacterial Mob proteins
makes this assumption questionable.
Partitioning and plasmid maintenance
The N-terminal half (amino acids 1160) of ORF1-349 in
pSOG1 is similar to the highly conserved ParB/SpoB protein
family involved in partitioning of bacterial plasmids and
chromosomes (Table 1). The sequence includes two conserved motifs that are proposed to be involved in interaction
with ParA/SopA and unknown host factors in bacteria
(Hanai et al., 1996), and a helixturnhelix DNA-binding
domain typical of the ParB family. The three motifs aligned
well with a set of divergent bacterial ParB proteins but
poorly with ORF470 and ORF422 of the Sulfolobus plasmid
pNOB8 (She et al., 1998), and not at all to ORFs in other
Sulfolobus CPs (not shown). Due to (i) the relatively high
similarity of ORF1-349 to bacterial rather than archaeal
homologues, (ii) the significant difference in codon usage
compared to the other pSOG ORFs (data not shown), and
(iii) the genomic context (Fig. 2), it is suspected that ORF1349 and surrounding DNA are the result of lateral gene
transfer. Thus this parB homologue has most likely been
acquired from a bacterial plasmid. The C-terminal region of
ORF1-349 showed similarity to COG 5483, for which no
function has yet been established. Surprisingly, a homologue
of ParA/SopA appears not to be encoded by pSOG1. In
bacteria, plasmid partitioning during cell division proceeds
via the so-called segrosome, a protein complex at least
consisting of ParA and ParB, which are encoded by the
plasmid-borne par locus (Gerdes et al., 2000; reviewed by
Hayes & Barilla, 2006). ParA is a membrane-associated
ATPase that forms a complex with the DNA-binding ParB

(Bignell & Thomas, 2001); the binding site of ParB is the
cis-acting partition site parS. The archaeal plasmid pNOB8,
which is stably maintained at a low copy number in its
natural host (~5 copies per chromosome), contains one
ParA and two ParB homologues, as well as a putative parS
element. These elements are missing in the unstable, highcopy-number variant pNOB8-33, formed after conjugative
transfer in the foreign host S. solfataricus P1 (She et al.,
1998). Previously, it was reported that Par-like components
are also absent in the other Sulfolobus CPs, which led to the
conclusion that they may lack copy number control and
partitioning (Greve et al., 2004). Similarly, no homologues
of parA or parS appear to be present on the genomes of
the pSOG plasmids. Probably maintenance of pSOG1 does
not require a partitioning system, most likely due to its
high copy number (4050 copies per chromosome) in S.
solfataricus P1. In the case of pSOG2, however, the stable
low copy number does suggest some partitioning system
that is different from the Par system. One such alternative
has been suggested to be the so-called clustered regularly
interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs, previously
referred to as SRSR). These repeats are present in many
prokaryotic genomes (Jansen et al., 2002), and also in
pNOB and pKEF9 (Greve et al., 2004; Peng et al., 2003).
An overexpression study in Haloferax initially suggested
involvement in replicon partitioning (Mojica et al., 1995).
However, recent comparative analyses suggest a role of the
repeats in a host-defence mechanism against extrachromosomal elements (viruses and plasmids) (Bolotin et al., 2005;
Mojica et al., 2005). No CRISPRs were found in the pSOG
plasmids. Hence, the molecular basis for partitioning of
low-copy-number archaeal CPs, including pSOG2, remains
to be identified.
Plasmid replication
The pSOG plasmids contain an operon of nine short
genes (ORF113 to ORF96) presumably involved in plasmid
replication. A similar operon is present in each Sulfolobus CP
and located in conserved region C of their genome (Greve
et al., 2004). Five of the genes of the pSOG operon, including
the first and the last two, occur in the same order in all
Sulfolobus CPs (Fig. 4). For two of the putative proteins,
searches in databases provide indirect evidence for their role
in DNA replication.
Sequence similarity indicates that ORF62 belongs to the
CopG family, a copy number control protein used by
numerous bacterial plasmids (del Solar et al., 2002). In these
bacterial plasmids, the copG gene is located upstream of a
gene encoding a replication initiator protein and the two
genes are expressed from a common promoter. The CopG
protein binds to this promoter and represses the expression
of both proteins, thus controlling the replication of the
plasmid (del Solar et al., 2002). A similar organization exists
in the Sulfolobus cryptic plasmid pRN1, where the copG
gene precedes the gene for a RepA homologue (Keeling
et al., 1998). It was shown that pRN1 CopG binds to a
1961
double-stranded DNA inverted repeat located within the

cop-rep promoter and thus could downregulate the expression the RepA protein (Lipps et al., 2001b). Such a set of
inverted repeats was also identified in the promoter region
of the replication operon of Sulfolobus CPs (Greve et al.,
2004). In pSOG plasmids as well, a set of 8 bp inverted
repeats separated by only 1 bp is found immediately downstream of the TATA box resembling the pRN1 CopG
binding site and also similar to the palindromic binding
site of CopG of the bacterial plasmid pMV158 (Gomis-Ruth
et al., 1998) (see Fig. 4 of Greve et al., 2004).
A function as replication initiator protein (RepA) was
proposed for one of the most conserved ORFs of the
replication operon (Greve et al., 2004). Indeed ORF99 of
pING1 shows weak but significant similarity to a putative
chromosomal replication initiator of Haemophilus ducreyi
(236 aa) and to RepA (346 aa) of plasmid pRUM from
Enterococcus faecium. These similarities can be detected only
when using the iterative PSI-BLAST tool. However, although
similar in size and location in the rep operon, pSOG ORF106
is not homologous to the otherwise highly conserved RepA
of Sulfolobus CPs. In fact, ORF106 of pSOG is homologous
only to ORF107 of pHVE14, which is also present in the
rep operon. Nevertheless, extensive search for a motif or
conserved domain failed. Therefore no putative function
could be attributed to this ORF. Since pSOG plasmids do
not contain a homologue of the putative RepA-encoding
gene, either it is not necessary for replication or another
pSOG ORF serves that function, perhaps ORF106.
A highly conserved ORF in the replication operon, ORF84,
exhibits a leucine-zipper motif from position 22 to 57. This
motif facilitates protein dimerization and is common to a
class of DNA-binding proteins mostly found in eukaryotic
transcription factors such as GCN4. A few examples of this
class are known in prokaryotes, including the RepA protein
of bacterial plasmids and two archaeal transcriptional

regulators, GvpE of Halobacterium salinarium (Kruger
et al., 1998) and PlrA of Sulfolobus (discussed below).
Plasmid replication origin
There are several reasons to assume that the origin of replication (oriV) may be located in the region extending from
ORF1-76 (and partly overlapping this ORF) to ORF87
spanning about 700 bp. First, in the Z-curve of a cumulative
GC-skew analyses of pSOG plasmids (not shown) both the X
and Y components show a sharp peak centred within ORF1153 and ORF2-150 in pSOG1 and pSOG2 respectively,
indicating a possible replication origin (Chen et al., 2005;
Zhang & Zhang, 2004). Second, that region contains a block
of predicted genes, most of which are conserved in a similar
gene context in other Sulfolobus conjugative and mobilizable
plasmids. Third, this region is immediately preceded by a
conspicuous AT-rich region (partly overlapping this conserved region) (Fig. 2), which may facilitate opening of the
DNA strands. This region is also relatively rich in short
repeated motifs that could serve as binding sites for replication factors, even though these repeats are not regularly
spaced like the so-called iterons which serve as binding
sites for RepA in bacterial plasmid origins (del Solar et al.,
1998). A putative origin of replication has been proposed
for Sulfolobus CPs that contains a specific direct repeat
59-TCTATACCCCC-39 with 3435 nt spacing in the context
of a highly conserved 170 nt region (Greve et al., 2004). This
direct repeat with appropriate spacing is found in both
pSOG1 and pSOG2 (Fig. 6), but the remainder of the
sequence is not well conserved and there are substantial
differences between pSOG1 and pSOG2 in both the intervening and flanking sequences. The pSOG1 sequence
resembles the pKEF9 putative origin whereas the pSOG2
sequence is more similar to the pNOB8 putative origin. This
may be critical for the simultaneous occurrence of both
Fig. 6. Comparison of the putative oriV locus in pSOG1 and pSOG2 and other Sulfolobus CPs. Yellow background
indicates blocks of nucleotides conserved in all Sulfolobus CPs oriV loci; grey background indicates those which are
conserved only in a group of CPs. Black arrows indicate highly conserved 11 bp direct repeats. Red nucleotides indicate
imperfect 1318 direct repeats found in most CPs. The portion of the plasmid genome shown corresponds to the following
positions: pSOG1, 1312313307; pSOG2, 1319313382; pARN3, 1285813035; pING1, 1340813585; pKEF9,
1356513748; pNOB8, 1959519751; pHVE14, 1499715175.
1962
Microbiology 152
plasmids (or of their precursors) in the original SOG2/4

strain (Fig. 1). This sequence partly overlaps with ORF1-76.
IS elements and transposases
Unlike the other Sulfolobus CPs, except the pARN family,
pSOG plasmids do not encode any protein with homology
to transposases or ORFs known to be associated with
insertion sequences (Fig. 4).
Putative transcriptional regulators
Bacterial CPs have evolved systems of regulation that
minimize the metabolic load on the host exerted by the
maintenance of a conjugative transfer apparatus while
optimizing the adaptive advantages of self-transmission.
Such systems also seem to operate in Sulfolobus CPs, like
pSOG2. Upon conjugation, pSOG2 actively replicates to a
high copy number, but subsequently replication appears to
be strongly down-regulated to reduce the copy number and
to maintain the plasmid stably in its new host. In bacterial
CPs, regulatory circuits involving specialized transcriptional
regulators have been described (Zatyka & Thomas, 2002).
There are as many as six ORFs that potentially play similar
roles in the pSOG plasmids. The first one, ORF62 or CopG,
was discussed above. ORF132 and ORF1-159 belong to a
superfamily of proteins containing a winged-helixturn
helix (wHTH) DNA-binding domain. Genomic studies have
shown that this class of HTH proteins is predominant in
Archaea and that its diversity is comparable to that of bacteria (for a recent review see Aravind et al., 2005). Although
the wHTH domain in Archaea combines with a variety of
other domains including components of the replication or
translation systems or in metabolic enzymes, most of the
archaeal wHTH-containing proteins are predicted to be
gene/operon-specific transcriptional regulators (Aravind &
Koonin, 1999). This seems to be the case for ORF132 and
ORF1-159, which are related to the MarR-like family
(Pfam1047). Homologues of ORF132 are present in the
Sulfolobus CP pHVE14, and several very closely related ORFs
were identified in the chromosome of S. acidocaldarius and
S. tokodaii (Table 1). Much weaker similarity to ORF132
was found with genes residing on pNOB8 and the S. solfataricus genome; no apparent homologues were found in
other CPs. Interestingly, ORF1-159 has no significant similarities with other putative regulators identified in other
Sulfolobus replicons nor with any proteins in the public
databases, and its wHTH domain aligns only poorly with
that of ORF132. The clear difference between the two DNAbinding proteins suggests that they have distinct functions
in pSOG-related regulation. Since ORF1-159 and the closely
associated ORF1-349 (ParB) were found only in pSOG1,
both appear to be dispensable for Sulfolobus plasmids. Both
ORF132 and ORF1-159 constitute a single-gene transcription unit; it is therefore difficult to infer which genes or
operon they may control.
ORF78 encodes a member of the novel family of Sulfolobus
plasmid regulatory proteins (pfam 05584) also known as
PlrA (Table 1). So far representatives of this family have

been found only in plasmids from the crenarchaeal genera
Sulfolobus and Acidianus (Kletzin et al., 1999; Peng et al.,
2000). This family is related to the DeoR family of bacterial
transcriptional activators (Pfam 00455). It is almost identical (98 % amino acid identity) to the PlrA homologues in
pARN3 and pKEF9 (Greve et al., 2004), but less so (~50 %
identical) to other PlrA proteins. One member of this new
family, ORF80 of the small cryptic plasmid pRN1 from S.
islandicus, has been characterized (Lipps et al., 2001a). It has
been shown experimentally that this basic protein binds in a
highly specific manner to double-stranded DNA sequences
upstream of ORF80. These sequences are conserved in the
region upstream of other family members including ORF78
of pSOG1. ORF80 binds DNA as a dimer. Sequence analysis
suggested that this dimerization is mediated by a leucinezipper motif, the location of which is inverted with respect
to the basic domain of the protein as compared to all other
known leucine-zipper proteins. ORF80 has thus been proposed to be the first representative of a novel class of leucinezipper proteins (Lipps et al., 2001a). Since the binding site of
ORF80 partly overlaps with the putative archaeal TATA box,
it was suggested that ORF80 represses its own transcription
in an autoregulatory manner. It was suggested that ORF80
could form a complex with the replication initiation machinery (Lipps et al., 2001a). Moreover, it has been proposed
that the region upstream of ORF80 contains the doublestranded origin of replication in pRN1, and that ORF80
could be involved in the regulation of plasmid copy number (Kletzin et al., 1999; Peng et al., 2000). Experimental
evidence supporting these hypotheses is still lacking. All
other plasmids of Sulfolobus, with the exception of pORA1
and pSOG2, contain PlrA homologues (Greve et al., 2004).
This indicates an important but not essential role for PlrA
for Sulfolobus plasmid function.
Interestingly, ORF93a and ORF175a, which form a putative
operon with ORF211 (in the order 93a211175a), are also
wHTH-containing proteins. ORF175a belongs to the TrmB
family (Pfam 01978), of which two members have recently
been characterized: TrmB is a sugar-specific transcriptional
regulator of the operon encoding the trehalose/maltose ABC
transporter in the hyperthermophilic euryarchaea Thermococcus litoralis and Pyrococcus furiosus (Lee et al., 2003).
ORF93a belongs to a small family of predicted transcriptional regulator proteins of euryarchaeotes. ORF175a is not
conserved in other described Sulfolobus CPs but is present in
the sequence deposed in GenBank (NC_005969) for plasmid
pTC of Sulfolobus. tengchongensis and in the integrated
plasmid-related element SA3 found in the chromosome of
S. acidocaldarius (Chen et al., 2005). ORF93a homologues
are found only in pARN3 and pHVE14. However in the
other CPs (pKEF9, pING1 and pNOB8) an ORF of about
the same size (encoding 9295 aa) is found upstream of the
ORF211 homologues (conserved in all the CPs) forming a
putative operon. All of these ORFs are predicted to encode
archaeal transcriptional regulators of the wHTH clan related
either to the MarR, LysR or to the ArsR families. Thus, all
1963
these small regulators seem to be interchangeable as long as

they ensure the same function in the same genomic context
in different plasmids.
The integrase of pSOG plasmids and its
integration site
Like other CPs of Sulfolobus, both pSOG plasmids contain a
homologue (ORF421) of a new family of integrase proteins,
the pNOB8-type integrase, originally identified by comparing plasmid-like sequences in the S. tokodaii genome
(Kawarabayasi et al., 2001) with the pNOB8 CP (She et al.,
2002). These integrases are assumed to facilitate reversible
integration of the CPs into the host chromosome by
site-specific recombination between a plasmid attachment
site attP and the corresponding chromosomal attB site.
The pNOB8-type integrase belongs to the superfamily of
tyrosine recombinases, which play several crucial roles in
prokaryotes and eukaryotes (for a review see Van Duyne,
2002). One striking feature of this family is the lack of global
homology among its more than 150 members. Nevertheless,
a conserved signature is found in the C-terminal part of all
the proteins. All members of the family harbour two short
regions of similarity, box I and box II, sharing four nearly
invariant amino acids residues, RHxxRY, directly
involved in catalysis of the DNA strand cleavage and
exchange (Esposito & Scocca, 1997; Nunes-Duby et al.,
1998). Sequence alignments revealed that both the motifs
found for the integrase of the Sulfolobus virus SSV1, the
SSV-type, RKxxxY, and for the pNOB8-type integrase,
RYxxxY differ from the consensus and may represent
three major classes of integrase (She et al., 2004).
The overall sequence of pSOG integrase is similar to that
of other Sulfolobus CPs and to the related integrase genes
found in the Sulfolobus and Aeropyrum chromosomes (an
alignment of the Sulfolobus CPs integrases with representative members of the tyrosine recombinases is available as
supplementary data with the online version of this paper).
Among these, however, pSOG integrase is more closely
related to the integrases of pKEF9, pARN3 and pHVE14,
with which it shares up to 63 % identity. These integrase
sequences clearly form a homogeneous distinct group. As
expected from the general features of tyrosine recombinases,
the differences from the other aligned sequences are more
pronouced in their N-terminal halves. Interestingly, search
for conserved protein domains revealed that pSOG Int and
the five other closely related integrases harbour a typical
HTH-XRE domain (smart: SM00530, pfam: PF01381) in
their N-termini (amino acid positions 1769 in pSOG Int).
This protein domain is found in a large family of DNAbinding proteins that include a bacterial plasmid copy
control protein, bacterial methylases, and various bacteriophage transcription control proteins like the Cro and cI
repressors of bacteriophage l. In Archaea, this motif is
also well represented, with 106 entries in the Smart database. Most of them are small proteins (less than than
200 aa) with no other conserved domain and are predicted
to be transcriptional regulators. Several of the archaeal
1964
HTH-XRE-containing proteins possess additional enzymic

or proteinprotein interaction domains. In a few cases, a
HTH-XRE domain is fused to a metabolic enzyme (e.g.
purine phosphoribosyltransferase of Pyrococcus abyssi,
PAB2035). These proteins might combine the catalytic
function with that of transcription regulation of the biosynthetic genes in response to the respective metabolite in
the environment. Another type of association is found in
archaeal inteins (e.g. those of the replication factor C from
Methanococcus jannaschii), where the HTH-XRE domain is
sandwiched between the N-terminal part of the intein
module and the inserted homing endonuclease domain
(Gogarten et al., 2002). This association with the endonuclease domain suggests that the HTH might play a role in the
recognition of target sequences by the endonuclease in the
process of homing.
By analogy with the previous examples, we envisage two
general roles for the HTH domain in the pSOG integrase.
First, the HTH domain could contribute to the integrase
DNA-binding at the attP site. In the prototype integrase,
the l integrase, the 356 aa sequence can be split into two
domains by limited proteolysis. The N-terminal domain
includes residues 164 and is responsible for binding the
so-called arm-type sites of attP [adjacent direct repeats sites
that flank the core region where crossing-over occurs (Groth
& Calos, 2004)] while the C-terminal domain binds the
lower-affinity core-type sites and contains the catalytic site
(Groth & Calos, 2004). That the HTH domain of pSOG
integrase could serve in binding of arm-type sites seems
unlikely since such a domain is absent in the closely related
pNOB8 integrase which has recently been proved active in
S. solfataricus (She et al., 2004), indicating that this domain
is not essential for the activity of the protein. Moreover,
none of the identified prokaryotic or eukaryotic integrases
possesses a HTH domain in its N-terminus. We therefore
infer that the HTH-XRE motif is somehow involved in
transcriptional regulation of the integration/excision of
pSOG plasmid.
The putative integration site attP used by the pSOG plasmids corresponds to a 43 bp invariant sequence which is
identical to the 39 end of two glutamyl-tRNA genes in the
S. solfataricus P2 genome. In virus SSV1, the only wellstudied archaeal integration system, a conserved 44 bp
sequence, identical to the 39 half of an arginyl-tRNA gene,
was found in the genome of the host Sulfolobus shibatae
flanking the provirus as direct repeats (Muskhelishvili
et al., 1993). Recent studies showed that the SSV1 integrase
cleaves both DNA strands at the att sites and that the
cleavage positions are localized on each side of the anticodon loop of the tRNA where SSV1 integration takes place
(Serre et al., 2002). This situation occurs quite frequently
in the prokaryotic integrases, where some subfamilies
recognize the flanking symmetry of the anti-codon stem
loop structure and use exclusively this tRNA sublocation as
integration site (Williams, 2002). Alignment of the Sulfolobus CP attP sequences with those of the corresponding
Microbiology 152
Fig. 7. Alignment of the Sulfolobus CP integration sites. Conserved sequence positions are indicated on a black (completely
conserved) or grey (partly conserved) background. Sequences in the attP region of each CP are aligned with their cognate
tRNA sequence from the S. solfataricus genome (no site found for pING1). The boxed sequence corresponds to the tRNA
anticodon loop and the flanking vertical arrows indicate the putative integrase cleavage positions. The core site symmetrical
elements of attP (P, P9) and attB (B, B9) are indicated following the conventions used by Campbell (1992) for bacterial
integration sites. The portion of the plasmid genome shown corresponds to the following positions: pSOG1, 2141821516;
pSOG2, 2279122889; pARN3, 2344223540; pKEF9, 2544825546; pNOB8, 3120331109; pHVE14,
2779027867. The portions of sequences shown are the reverse complement of that deposited in GenBank.
tRNA genes in S. solfatatricus (Fig. 7) strongly suggests that

all the Sulfolobus CP integrases also use the anti-codon
stemloop sublocation as integration site and therefore
belong to the same class of integrases as SSV1 Int. Interestingly, several Sulfolobus CP integrases, including pSOG
and pNOB8, apparently share the same putative integration
sites in Sulfolobus, the two tRNAGlu genes. However, pSOG
integrase may use preferentially the tRNAGlu with a CTC
anti-codon (Ssot26) that shows a perfect match with the
pSOG attP, while the second (Ssot32), with TTC as anticodon, has one mismatch in the anticodon. This situation
is the exact opposite of that in pNOB8 integrase (She et al.,
2004). Surprisingly, no attP site was detected in pING1
plasmids, which therefore can no longer integrate into the
host chromosome.
Comparison of the sites of recombination in the
pSOG1 and pSOG2 genomes
A putative recombination motif was previously described to
explain the variation of the pING family of Sulfolobus CPs
(Stedman et al., 2000). This motif, 59-TAAACTGGGGAGTTA-39, was also found in regions of sequence divergence in
the Sulfolobus CPs pHVE14, pKEF9, pARN3, pARN4 and
pNOB8 (Greve et al., 2004). Strikingly, this motif is found
flanking all but one of the locations in the pSOG1 and
pSOG2 genomes in which they differ (Fig. 2, Fig. 4). Two of
these sequences flank the conserved block of ORFs predicted to have conjugative functions (Fig. 4, section A) and
presumably allowed the recombination event producing
pSOG1 and pSOG2. Other recombination motifs flank the
region near the putative replication origin and the identical
sequences in pSOG1 and pSOG2. The only major gene
insertion in pSOG1 that does not contain this flanking
motif is between pSOG1 ORFs 1-421 and 1-288. This is the
region that encompasses the PlrA and ParB homologues in
pSOG1, leading us to speculate that this region was deleted
from pSOG2 rather than inserted in pSOG1. There are no
other sequences surrounding this region that indicate
recombination, other than that of the flanking integrase

gene ORF421.
Plasmid copy number and stability
The development of genetic tools for hyperthermophilic
Archaea in general and Sulfolobus in particular has been
hampered by the relative lack of stable plasmids with
controlled copy number. The fuselloviruses of Sulfolobus
replicate as double-stranded circular DNA and have been
used as self-spreading plasmids (Jonuscheit et al., 2003;
Schleper et al., 1995; Stedman et al., 1999). However,
with larger insertions these plasmids are not very stable
(Jonuscheit et al., 2003). Their copy number control is also
not well understood. The large Sulfolobus CP pNOB8 was
used as a vector for the first successful transformation of
Sulfolobus (Elferink et al., 1996) but is also not stable.
This study was initiated in order to determine the genetic
basis for stability and copy number control of the pSOG
plasmids. Plasmid pSOG2 is very attractive as a potential
vector as it has a stable low copy number in S. solfataricus P1
and can be transferred from cell to cell by conjugation.
Unfortunately the molecular basis of this control is not
clear. Perhaps the presence of the PlrA protein in pSOG1
causes a higher copy number or the origin of replication of
pSOG1 is more active. Stability may be directly related to
plasmid copy number, as strains containing CPs grow much
more slowly than those that do not (Prangishvili et al., 1998;
Schleper et al., 1995).
Plasmid compatibility and use as vectors
Plasmid compatibility has not been well studied in Sulfolobus. Compatible replicons are critical for sophisticated
genetic experiments. The integration sites of different SSV
viruses are different, indicating that they may be compatible
with each other, but this has yet to be demonstrated
(Wiedenheft et al., 2004). It is possible to co-infect certain
S. islandicus strains with both the SIRV virus and SSV1
1965
(Prangishvili et al., 1999). Small plasmids can occur in the

presence of either larger plasmids or virus genomes, as
has been shown for SSV2 and the virus/plasmid hybrid
pSSVx (Arnold et al., 1999). The non-conjugative plasmids
pRN1 and pRN2 were both found in the same strain of
S. islandicus, REN1H1 (Zillig et al., 1994), but contain no
selectable markers. The conjugation proteins of pSOG1 and
its putative replication origin are clearly related to the pKEF
family of Sulfolobus CPs, whereas the conjugation proteins
and the origin of pSOG2 are clearly related to counterparts
of the pARN family of Sulfolobus CPs. These two plasmids or
precursors thereof are found in the SOG2/4 strain (pSOG1
and pSOG2/4) (Fig. 1.). These two plasmids are the first
example of two different families of Sulfolobus CPs to be
found in the same Sulfolobus strain. Compatibility between
different families of Sulfolobus CPs was previously demonstrated in laboratory conjugation experiments but had not
previously been shown to exist in naturally occurring strains
(Prangishvili et al., 1998). It remains to be determined if
these CPs are also compatible with Sulfolobus viruses and
small plasmids. In any case pSOG2 should be a useful
addition to the Sulfolobus genetics tool-kit as a low-copynumber stable CP. pSOG1 may be useful as a Trojan horse
for the introduction of manipulated genes into host
chromosomes by homologous recombination or transient
expression.
Bell, S. D. & Jackson, S. P. (2000). The role of transcription factor B
in transcription initiation and promoter clearance in the archaeon

Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. J Biol Chem 275, 1293412940.
Benes, V., Hostomsky, Z., Arnold, L. & Paces, V. (1993). M13 and pUC
vectors with new unique restriction sites for cloning. Gene 130, 151152.
Bignell, C. & Thomas, C. M. (2001). The bacterial ParA-ParB
partitioning proteins. J Biotechnol 91, 134.

Birboim, H. C. & Doly, J. (1979). A rapid alkaline extraction
procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids

Res 7, 15131523.
Bolotin, A., Quinquis, B., Sorokin, A. & Ehrlich, S. D. (2005). Clustered
regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have

spacers of extrachromosomal origin. Microbiology 151, 25512561.
Brugger, K., Redder, P., She, Q., Confalonieri, F., Zivanovic, Y. &
Garrett, R. A. (2002). Mobile elements in archaeal genomes. FEMS
Microbiol Lett 206, 131141.

Campbell, A. (1992). Chromosomal insertion sites for phages and
plasmids. J Bacteriol 174, 74957499.
Cannio, R., Contursi, P., Rossi, M. & Bartolucci, S. (1998). An
autonomously replicating transforming vector for Sulfolobus solfataricus. J Bacteriol 180, 32373240.
Chen, L., Brugger, K., Skovgaard, M. & 8 other authors (2005). The
Genome of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, a model organism of the

Crenarchaeota. J Bacteriol 187, 49924999.
Condo, I., Ciammaruconi, A., Benelli, D., Ruggero, D. & Londei, P.
(1999). Cis-acting signals controlling translational initiation in the
thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. Mol Microbiol 34,

377384.
Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J. M. & Brenner, S. E. (2004).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
G. E. was supported by EU grant ERBIO4-CT96-0270; K. S. was
supported by a Marie Curie Fellowship from the European Commission, a NSF-NATO Fellowship and Portland State University.
Thanks to members of the Zillig lab for Southern blots on S. islandicus
strains.
WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14, 11881190.

Dalgaard, J. Z. & Garrett, R. A. (1993). Archaeal hyperthermophile
genes. In The Biochemistry of Archaea (Archaebacteria), pp. 535563.

Edited by M. Kates, D. J. Kusher & A. T. Matheson. Amsterdam:
Elsevier.
del Solar, G., Giraldo, R., Ruiz-Echevarria, M.-J., Espinosa, M. &
Diaz-Orejas, R. (1998). Replication and control of circular bacterial
plasmids. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 434464.
REFERENCES
Albers, S.-V., Jonuscheit, M., Dinkelaker, S., Urich, T., Kletzin, A.,
Tampe, R., Driessen, A. J. M. & Schleper, C. (2006). Production of
recombinant and tagged proteins in the hyperthermophilic archaeon

Sulfolobus solfataricus. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 102111.
del Solar, G., Hernandez-Arriaga, A. M., Gomis-Ruth, F. X., Coll, M.

& Espinosa, M. (2002). A genetically economical family of plasmid-
encoded transcriptional repressors involved in control of plasmid

copy number. J Bacteriol 184, 49434951.
Edgar, R. C. (2004). MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high
accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 17921797.
Elferink, M. G., Schleper, C. & Zillig, W. (1996). Transformation of
hyperthermophilic archaea. Extremophiles 1, 183191.
the extremely thermoacidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus via

a self-spreading vector. FEMS Microbiol Lett 137, 3135.
Aravind, L. & Koonin, E. V. (1999). DNA-binding proteins and
Elie, C., Baucher, M. F., Fondrat, C. & Forterre, P. (1997). A protein
Aravalli, R. N. & Garrett, R. A. (1997). Shuttle vectors for
evolution of transcription regulation in the archaea. Nucleic Acids

Res 27, 46584670.
related to eucaryal and bacterial DNA-motor proteins in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. J Mol Evol 45, 107114.
Aravind, L., Anantharaman, V., Balaji, S., Babu, M. M. & Iyer, L. M.

(2005). The many faces of the helix-turn-helix domain: transcription
Esposito, D. & Scocca, J. (1997). The integrase family of tyrosine
regulation and beyond. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29, 231262.
recombinases: evolution of a conserved active site domain. Nucleic

Acids Res 25, 36053614.
Arnold, H. P., She, Q., Phan, H., Stedman, K., Prangishvili, D.,
Holz, I., Kristjansson, J. K., Garrett, R. & Zillig, W. (1999). The
Francia, M. V., Varsaki, A., Garcillan-Barcia, M. P., Latorre, A.,

Drainas, C. & de la Cruz, F. (2004). A classification scheme for mobi-
genetic element pSSVx of the extremely thermophilic crenarchaeon

Sulfolobus is a hybrid between a plasmid and a virus. Mol Microbiol
34, 217226.
Bartolucci, S., Rossi, M. & Cannio, R. (2003). Characterization and
functional complementation of a nonlethal deletion in the chromosome of a b-glycosidase mutant of Sulfolobus solfataricus. J Bacteriol
185, 39483957.
1966
lization regions of bacterial plasmids. FEMS Microbiol Rev 28, 79100.

Garcia-Vallve, S., Guzman, E., Montero, M. A. & Romeu, A. (2003).
HGT-DB: a database of putative horizontally transferred genes in

prokaryotic complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 31, 187189.
Gerdes, K., Moller-Jensen, J. & Bugge Jensen, R. (2000). Plasmid
and chromosome partitioning: surprises from phylogeny. Mol Microbiol

37, 455466.
Microbiology 152
Gogarten, J. P., Senejani, A. G., Zhaxybayeva, O., Olendzenski, L. &

Hilario, E. (2002). Inteins: structure, function, and evolution. Annu
Lipps, G., Stegert, M. & Krauss, G. (2001b). Thermostable and site-
Gomis-Ruth, F. X., Sola, M., Acebo, P. & 7 other authors (1998).
specific DNA binding of the gene product ORF56 from the Sulfolobus islandicus plasmid pRN1, a putative archael plasmid copy
control protein. Nucleic Acids Res 29, 904913.
The structure of plasmid-encoded transcriptional repressor CopG

unliganded and bound to its operator. EMBO J 17, 74047415.
Llosa, M. & de la Cruz, F. (2005). Bacterial conjugation: a potential

tool for genomic engineering. Res Microbiol 156, 16.
Grahn, A. M., Haase, J., Bamford, D. H. & Lanka, E. (2000).
Llosa, M., Gomis-Ruth, F. X., Coll, M. & de la Cruz Fd, F. (2002).
Components of the RP4 conjugative transfer apparatus form an

envelope structure bridging inner and outer membranes of donor
cells: implications for related macromolecule transport systems.
J Bacteriol 182, 15641574.
Bacterial conjugation: a two-step mechanism for DNA transport.

Mol Microbiol 45, 18.
Rev Microbiol 56, 263287.
Greve, B., Jensen, G. B., Brugger, K., Zillig, W. & Garrett, R. (2004).
Genomic comparison of archaeal plasmids from Sulfolobus. Archaea

1, 231239.
Grohmann, E., Muth, G. & Espinosa, M. (2003). Conjugative plasmid
Llosa, M., Zunzunegui, S. & de la Cruz, F. (2003). Conjugative
coupling proteins interact with cognate and heterologous VirB10-like

proteins while exhibiting specificity for cognate relaxosomes. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 1046510470.
Martusewitsch, E., Sensen, C. W. & Schleper, C. (2000). High
transfer in gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67,

277301.
spontaneous mutation rate in the hyperthermophilic archaeon

Sulfolobus solfataricus is mediated by transposable elements.
J Bacteriol 182, 25742581.
Groth, A. C. & Calos, M. P. (2004). Phage integrases: biology and
Mojica, F. J., Ferrer, C., Juez, G. & Rodriguez-Valera, F. (1995). Long
applications. J Mol Biol 335, 667678.
stretches of short tandem repeats are present in the largest replicons

of the Archaea Haloferax mediterranei and Haloferax volcanii
and could be involved in replicon partitioning. Mol Microbiol 17,
8593.
Hanai, R., Liu, R., Benedetti, P., Caron, P. R., Lynch, A. S. & Wang,
J. C. (1996). Molecular dissection of a protein SopB essential for
Escherichia coli F plasmid partition. J Biol Chem 271, 1746917475.

Hayes, F. & Barilla, D. (2006). The bacterial segrosome: a dynamic
nucleoprotein machine for DNA trafficking and segregation. Nat Rev

Micro 4, 133143.
Jansen, R., Embden, J. D. A. V., Gaastra, W. & Schouls, L. M. (2002).
Mojica, F. J., Diez-Villasenor, C., Garcia-Martinez, J. C. & Soria, E.

(2005). Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats
derive from foreign genetic elements. J Mol Evol 60, 174182.

Muskhelishvili, G., Palm, P. & Zillig, W. (1993). SSV1-encoded site-
Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in

prokaryotes. Mol Microbiol 43, 15651575.
specific recombination system in Sulfolobus shibatae. Mol Gen Genet

237, 334342.
Jonuscheit, M., Martusewitsch, E., Stedman, K. M. & Schleper, C.

(2003). A reporter gene system for the hyperthermophilic archaeon
Nei, M. & Kumar, K. (2000). Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics.
Sulfolobus solfataricus based on a selectable and integrative shuttle

vector. Mol Microbiol 48, 12411252.
Nunes-Duby, S. E., Kwon, H. J., Tirumalai, R. S., Ellenberger, T. &

Landy, A. (1998). Similarities and differences among 105 members of
Kawarabayasi, Y., Hino, Y., Horikawa, H. & 27 other authors (2001).
the Int family of site-specific recombinases. Nucleic Acids Res 26,

391406.
Complete genome sequence of an aerobic thermoacidophilic crenarchaeon, Sulfolobus tokodaii strain 7. DNA Res 8, 123140.
Keeling, P. J., Klenk, H. P., Singh, R. K., Schenk, M. E., Sensen, C. W.,
Zillig, W. & Doolittle, W. F. (1998). Sulfolobus islandicus plasmids
pRN1 and pRN2 share distant but common evolutionary ancestry.

Extremophiles 2, 391393.
Kletzin, A., Lieke, A., Urich, T., Charlebois, R. L. & Sensen, C. W.
(1999). Molecular analysis of pDL10 from Acidianus ambivalens
reveals a family of related plasmids from extremely thermophilic and

acidophilic archaea. Genetics 152, 13071314.
Kruger, K., Hermann, T., Armbruster, V. & Pfeifer, F. (1998). The
transcriptional activator GvpE for the halobacterial gas vesicle genes

resembles a basic region leucine-zipper regulatory protein. J Mol Biol
279, 761771.
Kumar, S., Tamura, K. & Nei, M. (2004). MEGA3: integrated software
for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5, 150163.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Palm, P., Schleper, C., Grampp, B., Yeats, S., McWilliam, P., Reiter,
W. D. & Zillig, W. (1991). Complete nucleotide sequence of the virus
SSV1 of the archaebacterium Sulfolobus shibatae. Virology 185,

242250.
Pansegrau, W., Lanka, E., Barth, P. T. & 7 other authors (1994).
Complete nucleotide sequence of Birmingham IncPa plasmids.
Compilation and comparative analysis. J Mol Biol 239, 623663.

Peng, X., Holz, I., Zillig, W., Garrett, R. A. & She, Q. (2000). Evolution
of the family of pRN plasmids and their integrase-mediated insertion

into the chromosome of the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus.
J Mol Biol 303, 449454.
Peng, X., Brugger, K., Shen, B., Chen, L., She, Q. & Garrett, R. A.
(2003). Genus-specific protein binding to the large clusters of DNA
repeats (short regularly spaced repeats) present in Sulfolobus

genomes. J Bacteriol 185, 24102417.
Prangishvili, D., Albers, S. V., Holz, I. & 8 other authors (1998).
bacterial conjugation. Annu Rev Biochem 64, 141169.
Conjugation in Archaea: frequent occurrence of conjugative plasmids

in Sulfolobus. Plasmid 40, 190202.
Lee, S. J., Engelmann, A., Horlacher, R., Qu, Q., Vierke, G.,
Hebbeln, C., Thomm, M. & Boos, W. (2003). TrmB, a sugar-specific
Prangishvili, D., Arnold, H. P., Gotz, D., Ziese, U., Holz, I.,
Kristjansson, J. K. & Zillig, W. (1999). A novel virus family, the
transcriptional regulator of the trehalose/maltose ABC transporter

from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus litoralis. J Biol
Chem 278, 983990.
Prangishvili, D., Stedman, K. & Zillig, W. (2001). Viruses of the
Lipps, G., Ibanez, P., Stroessenreuther, T., Hekimian, K. &

Krauss, G. (2001a). The protein ORF80 from the acidophilic and
extremely thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus. Trends Microbiol 9,

3943.
thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus islandicus binds highly sitespecifically to double-stranded DNA and represents a novel type
of basic leucine zipper protein. Nucleic Acids Res 29, 49734982.
Reilly, M. S. & Grogan, D. W. (2001). Characterization of intragenic
Lanka, E. & Wilkins, B. M. (1995). DNA processing reactions in
Rudiviridae: structure, virus-host interactions and genome variability

of the sulfolobus viruses SIRV1 and SIRV2. Genetics 152, 13871396.
recombination in a hyperthermophilic archaeon via conjugational

DNA exchange. J Bacteriol 183, 29432946.
1967

Reiter, W. D., Palm, P. & Ziilig, W. (1988). Analysis of transcription in
the archaebacterium Sulfolobus indicates that archaebacterial promoters are homologous to eukaryotic pol II promoters. Nucleic Acids
Res 16, 119.
Rice, G., Stedman, K., Snyder, J., Wiedenheft, B., Willits, D.,
Brumfield, S., McDermott, T. & Young, M. J. (2001). Viruses from
extreme thermal environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98,

1334113345.
Saitou, N. & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new
method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4,

406425.
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989). Molecular Cloning.
A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor

Laboratory.
Schleper, C., Kubo, K. & Zillig, W. (1992). The particle SSV1 from
the extremely thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus is a virus: demonstration of infectivity and of transfection with viral DNA. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A 89, 76457649.
Schleper, C., Holz, I., Janekovic, D., Murphy, J. & Zillig, W. (1995a).
A multicopy plasmid of the extremely thermophilic archaeon

Sulfolobus effects its transfer to recipients by mating. J Bacteriol
177, 44174426.
Schroder, G. & Lanka, E. (2003). TraG-like proteins of Type IV
secretion systems: functional dissection of the multiple activities of

TraG (RP4) and TrwB (R388). J Bacteriol 185, 43714381.
Schroder, G., Krause, S., Zechner, E. L., Traxler, B., Yeo, H.-J.,
Lurz, R., Waksman, G. & Lanka, E. (2002). TraG-like proteins of
DNA transfer systems and of the Helicobacter pylori Type IV

secretion system: inner membrane gate for exported substrates?
J Bacteriol 184, 27672779.
Serre, M. C., Letzelter, C., Garel, J. R. & Duguet, M. (2002). Cleavage
Sulfolobus solfataricus: construction and testing of viral shuttle

vectors. Genetics 152, 13971405.
Stedman, K. M., She, Q., Phan, H., Holz, I., Singh, H., Prangishvili,
D., Garrett, R. & Zillig, W. (2000). pING family of conjugative plas-
mids from the extremely thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus islandicus:

insights into recombination and conjugation in Crenarchaeota.
J Bacteriol 182, 70147020.
Thompson, W., Rouchka, E. C. & Lawrence, C. E. (2003). Gibbs
Recursive Sampler: finding transcription factor binding sites. Nucleic

Acids Res 31, 35803585.
Tolstrup, N., Sensen, C. W., Garrett, R. A. & Clausen, I. G. (2000).
Two different and highly organized mechanisms of translation initiation

in the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. Extremophiles 4, 175179.
Torarinsson, E., Klenk, H.-P. & Garrett, R. A. (2005). Divergent
transcriptional and translational signals in Archaea. Environ

Microbiol 7, 4754.
Van Duyne, G. D. (2002). A structural view of tyrosine recombinase
site-specific recombination. In Mobile DNA II, pp. 93117. Edited by

N. L. Craig, R. Craigie, M. Gellert & A. Lambowitz. Washington,
DC: American Society for Microbiology.
Wiedenheft, B., Stedman, K., Roberto, F., Willits, D., Gleske, A.-K.,
Zoeller, L., Snyder, J., Douglas, T. & Young, M. (2004). Comparative
genomic analysis of hyperthermophilic archaeal fuselloviridae

viruses. J Virol 78, 19541961.
Williams, K. P. (2002). Integration sites for genetic elements in
prokaryotic tRNA and tmRNA genes: sublocation preference of
integrase subfamilies. Nucleic Acids Res 30, 866875.
Worthington, P., Hoang, V., Perez-Pomares, F. & Blum, P. (2003).
Targeted disruption of the a-amylase gene in the hyperthermophilic
archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. J Bacteriol 185, 482488.
properties of an archaeal site-specific recombinase, the SSV1

integrase. J Biol Chem 277, 1675816767.
Xiang, X., Dong, X. & Huang, L. (2003). Sulfolobus tengchongensis sp.

nov., a novel thermoacidophilic archaeon isolated from a hot spring
in Tengchong, China. Extremophiles 7, 493498.
She, Q., Phan, H., Garrett, R. A., Albers, S. V., Stedman, K. M. &
Zillig, W. (1998). Genetic profile of pNOB8 from Sulfolobus: the first
Zatyka, M. & Thomas, C. M. (2002). Control of genes for conjugative
conjugative plasmid from an archaeon. Extremophiles 8, 417425.
transfer of plasmids and other mobile elements. FEMS Microbiol Rev

21, 291319.
She, Q., Singh, R. K., Confalonieri, F. & 28 other authors (2001).
Zhang, R. & Zhang, C. T. (2004). Identification of replication origins
The complete genome of the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus P2.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 78357840.
in archaeal genomes based on the Z-curve method. Archaea 1,

335346.
She, Q., Brugger, K. & Chen, L. (2002). Archaeal integrative genetic
Zillig, W., Stetter, K. O., Wunderl, S., Schulz, W., Priess, H. &
Scholz, I. (1980). The Sulfolobus -Caldariella group: taxonomy
elements and their impact on genome evolution. Res Microbiol 153,

325332.
She, Q., Shen, B. & Chen, L. (2004). Archaeal integrases and
mechanisms of gene capture. Biochem Soc Trans 32, 222226.

Soppa, J. (1999). Normalized nucleotide frequencies allow the
definition of archaeal promoter elements for different archaeal

groups and reveal base-specific TFB contacts upstream of the TATA
box. Mol Microbiol 31, 15891592.
Stedman, K. M., Schleper, C., Rumpf, E. & Zillig, W. (1999). Genetic
requirements for the function of the archaeal virus SSV1 in
1968
on the basis of the structure of DNA-dependent RNA polymerases.

Arch Microbiol 125, 259269.
Zillig, W., Kletzin, A., Schleper, C., Holz, I., Janecovik, D., Hain, J.,
Lanzendorfer, M. & Kristjansson, J. (1994). Screening for Sulfo-
lobales, their plasmids and viruses in Icelandic solfataras. Syst Appl

Microbiol 16, 609628.
Zillig, W., Arnold, H. P., Holz, I. & 7 other authors (1998). Genetic
elements in the extremely thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus.

Extremophiles 2, 131140.
Microbiology 152

tmp475B TMP

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

tmp475B TMP

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

tmp475B TMP

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Microbiology (2006), 152, 19511968

Two novel conjugative plasmids from a single

Laboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Max-Planck-Institut fur Biochemie, Martinsried, Germany

Biology Department, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207, USA

Received 22 January 2006

Accepted 6 March 2006

0002-8861 G 2006 SGM

Printed in Great Britain

1999) and conjugation (Reilly & Grogan, 2001; Schleper

G. Erauso and others

of genes covering approximately 12 kbp of the plasmids

isolates of strains containing the pSOG plasmids were obtained

DNA as template. The sequences were trimmed and assembled using

NTI software (version 9, Informax). Direct and inverted sequence

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The pSOG conjugative plasmids

Fig. 1. Generation of plasmids pSOG1 and

Sulfolobus CPs, prolonged growth of transcipients resulted

respectively. The corresponding value for the chromosome

G. Erauso and others

distributed on both DNA strands and apart from a few

The pSOG conjugative plasmids

Operons and putative transcriptional and

found in other Sulfolobus extrachromosomal elements (e.g.

ORFs in pSOG1 and/or pSOG2

Family, Domains, Motifs

COG3451: VirB4, TrbE; COG0433:

TM (1), SP, mbp

pfam02534: TraG/TraD family;

TrmB family (pfam 01978)

COG4742: transcriptional regulator

COG1846.1 and pfam1047: MarR

G. Erauso and others

Table 1. Properties of ORFs and operons of plasmids pSOG1 and pSOG2

Family, Domains, Motifs

pfam 00589 and COG4974:

pfam 05584: Sulfolobus plasmids

COG1846.1: MarR family; wHTH

DNA mobility Conjugation?

The pSOG conjugative plasmids

ORFs in pSOG1 and/or pSOG2

Family, Domains, Motifs

COG1196: Smc, ATPases

TM (1), SP, mbp

G. Erauso and others

The pSOG conjugative plasmids

(a) pSOG promoter region

(b) pSOG RBS

(c) Terminator pSOG

G. Erauso and others

Fig. 5. Phylogenetic relationships between

the same predicted topology as their bacterial homologues

The pSOG conjugative plasmids

Homology searches failed to detect putative components of

ATPase that forms a complex with the DNA-binding ParB

G. Erauso and others

double-stranded DNA inverted repeat located within the

of bacterial plasmids and two archaeal transcriptional