Inventory Documents
Inventory Documents
Inventory Documents
CHAPTER
11
Inventory
Management
Types of Inventories
Finished-goods inventories
(manufacturing firms)
or merchandise
(retail stores)
Functions of Inventory
Reasonable estimates of
Holding costs
Ordering costs
Shortage costs
Periodic System
Physical count of items made at periodic
intervals
214800 232087768
A - very important
B - mod. important
C - least important
High
Annual
$ value
of items
B
C
Low
Few
Many
Number of Items
Q
Quantity
on hand
Usage
rate
Reorder
point
Receive
order
Place Receive
order order
Lead time
Place Receive
order order
Time
Order frequency
Total Cost
Annual
Annual
Total cost = carrying + ordering
cost
cost
TC =
Q
H
2
DS
Q
Annual Cost
Ordering Costs
QO (optimal order quantity)
Order Quantity
(Q)
Q OPT =
2DS
=
H
Example
Problem
Problem
If ordering costs were to increase in $1 per order, how much would that
affect the minimum total annual cost?
EPQ Model
Q0
2DS
p
H p u
Example
Problem
Problem
Annual Cost
Holding Costs
Ordering Costs
QO (optimal order quantity)
Order Quantity
(Q)
Q OPT =
2DS
=
H
Total Cost
Annual
Annual
Total cost = carrying + ordering
cost
cost
TC =
Q
H
2
DS
Q
Annual
Annual
Purchasing
+
TC = carrying + ordering cost
cost
cost
Q
H
TC =
2
DS
Q
PD
Cost
TC without PD
PD
EOQ
Quantity
Order
quantity
Unit Price
1 to 44
$2.00
45 to 69
1.70
70 or more
1.40
1,000 to 1,999
$1.25
2,000 to 4,999
1.20
5,000 to 9,999
1.15
10,000 or more
1.10
TC
Lowest TC
2,400
5,000
10,000
Quantity
Only one of the unit prices will have the minimum point in its
feasible range since the ranges do not overlap. Identify that
range.
Otherwise, compute the total cost for the minimum point and
for the price breaks of all lower unit costs. Compare the total
costs; the quantity (minimum point or price break) that yields
the lowest total cost is the optimal order quantity.
If carrying costs are $2 per day for each stone, find the
order quantity that will minimize total annual cost.
If the minimum point for the lowest unit price is feasible, it is the
optimal order quantity. If the minimum point is not feasible in
the lowest price range, compare the total cost at the price break
for all lower prices with the total cost of the feasible minimum
point. The quantity which yields the lowest total cost is the
optimum.
TC
495
497
500
503
1,000
4,000
Quantity
6,000
A simple case:
Demand is constant
Quantity
Safety Stock
ROP
Safety stock
LT
Time
Reorder Point
The ROP based on a normal
Distribution of lead time demand
Service level
Risk of
a stockout
Probability of
no stockout
Expected
demand
0
ROP
Quantity
Safety
stock
z
z-scale
Reorder Point
ROP = Expected demand during lead time + safety stocks
Expected demand
ROP
during lead time
z dLT
Example
The ROP that will provide a 5% risk of stockout during lead time.
The ROP that will provide a 1% risk of stockout during lead time.
The safety stock needed to attain a 1% risk of stockout during lead time.
0.00
0.0013
0.0019
0.0026
0.0035
0.0047
0.0062
0.0082
0.0107
0.0139
0.0179
0.0228
0.0287
0.0359
0.0446
0.0548
0.0668
0.0808
0.0968
0.1151
0.1357
0.1587
0.1841
0.2119
0.2420
0.2743
0.3085
0.3446
0.3821
0.4207
0.4602
0.5000
0.08
0.0010
0.0014
0.0020
0.0027
0.0037
0.0049
0.0066
0.0087
0.0113
0.0146
0.0188
0.0239
0.0301
0.0375
0.0465
0.0571
0.0694
0.0838
0.1003
0.1190
0.1401
0.1635
0.1894
0.2177
0.2483
0.2810
0.3156
0.3520
0.3897
0.4286
0.4681
0.09
0.0010
0.0014
0.0019
0.0026
0.0036
0.0048
0.0064
0.0084
0.0110
0.0143
0.0183
0.0233
0.0294
0.0367
0.0455
0.0559
0.0681
0.0823
0.0985
0.1170
0.1379
0.1611
0.1867
0.2148
0.2451
0.2776
0.3121
0.3483
0.3859
0.4247
0.4641
z
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.0
0.00
0.5000
0.5398
0.5793
0.6179
0.6554
0.6915
0.7257
0.7580
0.7881
0.8159
0.8413
0.8643
0.8849
0.9032
0.9192
0.9332
0.9452
0.9554
0.9641
0.9713
0.9772
0.9821
0.9861
0.9893
0.9918
0.9938
0.9953
0.9965
0.9974
0.9981
0.9987
0.01
0.5040
0.5438
0.5832
0.6217
0.6591
0.6950
0.7291
0.7611
0.7910
0.8186
0.8438
0.8665
0.8869
0.9049
0.9207
0.9345
0.9463
0.9564
0.9649
0.9719
0.9778
0.9826
0.9864
0.9896
0.9920
0.9940
0.9955
0.9966
0.9975
0.9982
0.9987
0.02
0.5080
0.5478
0.5871
0.6255
0.6628
0.6985
0.7324
0.7642
0.7939
0.8212
0.8461
0.8686
0.8888
0.9066
0.9222
0.9357
0.9474
0.9573
0.9656
0.9726
0.9783
0.9830
0.9868
0.9898
0.9922
0.9941
0.9956
0.9967
0.9976
0.9982
0.9987
0.03
0.5120
0.5517
0.5910
0.6293
0.6664
0.7019
0.7357
0.7673
0.7967
0.8238
0.8485
0.8708
0.8907
0.9082
0.9236
0.9370
0.9484
0.9582
0.9664
0.9732
0.9788
0.9834
0.9871
0.9901
0.9925
0.9943
0.9957
0.9968
0.9977
0.9983
0.9988
0.04
0.5160
0.5557
0.5948
0.6331
0.6700
0.7054
0.7389
0.7704
0.7995
0.8264
0.8508
0.8729
0.8925
0.9099
0.9251
0.9382
0.9495
0.9591
0.9671
0.9738
0.9793
0.9838
0.9875
0.9904
0.9927
0.9945
0.9959
0.9969
0.9977
0.9984
0.9988
0.05
0.5199
0.5596
0.5987
0.6368
0.6736
0.7088
0.7422
0.7734
0.8023
0.8289
0.8531
0.8749
0.8944
0.9115
0.9265
0.9394
0.9505
0.9599
0.9678
0.9744
0.9798
0.9842
0.9878
0.9906
0.9929
0.9946
0.9960
0.9970
0.9978
0.9984
0.9989
0.06
0.5239
0.5636
0.6026
0.6406
0.6772
0.7123
0.7454
0.7764
0.8051
0.8315
0.8554
0.8770
0.8962
0.9131
0.9279
0.9406
0.9515
0.9608
0.9686
0.9750
0.9803
0.9846
0.9881
0.9909
0.9931
0.9948
0.9961
0.9971
0.9979
0.9985
0.9989
0.07
0.5279
0.5675
0.6064
0.6443
0.6808
0.7157
0.7486
0.7794
0.8078
0.8340
0.8577
0.8790
0.8980
0.9147
0.9292
0.9418
0.9525
0.9616
0.9693
0.9756
0.9808
0.9850
0.9884
0.9911
0.9932
0.9949
0.9962
0.9972
0.9979
0.9985
0.9989
0.08
0.5319
0.5714
0.6103
0.6480
0.6844
0.7190
0.7517
0.7823
0.8106
0.8365
0.8599
0.8810
0.8997
0.9162
0.9306
0.9429
0.9535
0.9625
0.9699
0.9761
0.9812
0.9854
0.9887
0.9913
0.9934
0.9951
0.9963
0.9973
0.9980
0.9986
0.9990
0.09
0.5359
0.5753
0.6141
0.6517
0.6879
0.7224
0.7549
0.7852
0.8133
0.8389
0.8621
0.8830
0.9015
0.9177
0.9319
0.9441
0.9545
0.9633
0.9706
0.9767
0.9817
0.9857
0.9890
0.9916
0.9936
0.9952
0.9964
0.9974
0.9981
0.9986
0.9990
Problem
where
d Average daily or weekly demand
d Standard deviation of demand per day or week
LT Lead time in days or weeks
Example
where
d Daily or weekly demand
Problem
2
ROP d LT z LT d2 d 2 LT
Problem
Problem
Problem
Problem
E (n) E ( z ) dLT
E ( z ) Standardized number of units short from Table 11.3
dLT standard deviation of demand during lead time
Example
D
E ( N ) E ( n)
Q
Example
Example
Demand = 100 units/year,
Annual shortage = 10 units
Annual service level = 90/100 = 90%
General formula:
SLannual
E( N )
1
D
Example
Given
Problem
What average number of units short per year will be consistent with the
specified annual service level?
What average number of units short per cycle will provide the desired
annual service level?
What lead time service level is necessary for the 96% annual service
level?
Risk of stockout
Fixed-Order-Interval Model
Expected demand
Amount
Safety
Amount on hand
= during protection +
to order
stock
at reorder time
interval
= d (OI LT ) + z d OI LT
Where
Example
Caspian restaurant also serves apple juice. Demand for the juice
is approximately normal with a mean of 35 liters per week and
std of 6 liters per week. If shortage cost is 50 cents and excess
cost is 25 cents per liter, find
P{demand = 1} = 0.3
P{demand = 2} = 0.4
P{demand = 3} = 0.2
Problem
Skinners Fish Market buys fresh Boston blue fish daily for
$4.20 per pound and sells it for $5.70 per pound. At the end of
each business day, any remaining blue fish is sold to a producer
of cat food for $2.40 per pound. Daily demand can be
approximated by a normal distribution with a mean of 80
pounds and a standard deviation of 10 pounds. What is the
optimal stocking level?
Problem
Burger Prince buys top-grade ground beef for $1.00 per pound.
A large sign over the entrance guarantees that the meat is fresh
daily. Any leftover meat is sold to the local high school
cafeteria for 80 cents per pound. Four hamburgers can be
prepared from each pound of meat. Burgers sell for 60 cents
each. Labor, overhead, meat, buns, and condiments cost 50
cents per burger. Demand is normally distributed with a mean
of 400 pounds per day and a standard deviation of 50 pounds
per day.