0% found this document useful (0 votes)
194 views5 pages

Gts Ewm Ncts Process

GTS-EWM-NCTS process

Uploaded by

gaganchodhry
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
194 views5 pages

Gts Ewm Ncts Process

GTS-EWM-NCTS process

Uploaded by

gaganchodhry
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

5/11/2015

GTSEWMNCTSprocess|SCN

GettingStarted Newsletters

Hi,Guest

LogOn

JoinUs

Store

SearchtheCommunity

Products

Services&Support

AboutSCN

Downloads

Industries

Training&Education

Partnership

DeveloperCenter

Activity

LinesofBusiness

UniversityAlliances

Events&Webinars

Innovation

Browse

Communications

Actions

8Replies Latestreply:Apr8,20154:36PMbyDhilipanSundararajan

Share

Tweet

0 Like

DhilipanSundararajan

Apr1,20159:07PM

GTSEWMNCTSprocess
ThisquestionisNotAnswered.
HiExperts,

IhavenoexperiencewithEWM,thoughihaveworkedontheERPWarehousemanagement.EWM
seemstobebitdifficultforme

IamtryingtosetupECCEWMGTSintegrationforasimpletransitprocedurewithSafekeeping.

IcreatemyIBDinECC,entertheT1andMRN#,IseeaTransitbeingcreatedinGTSbythe
normalprocessandthesameIBDgetsdistributedtoEWM.
InEWM,IseethesameT1andMRNfromECCisavailableinEWM.Isetupthe"inyard"status
andseeanotherTransitbeingcreatedinGTSwiththesameIBD#.

WithoutT1andMRNonmyIBDinECC,noTransitinGTS.
NowwhenIkeyinT1/MRNinEWMandset"Inyard"statusformyIBDinEWM,Icanfinda
TransitinGTS.Soonly1TransitinGTS/

Somyquestionisontheusualprocess

1)ShouldwestopkeyingintheT1andMRNinECCanddoitonlyinEWM?

2)IthoughtwhenIsetup"inyard"statusinEWMforthesameMRNthatwaskeyedinECC,system
willstillcheckifthereisaTransitavailablealreadywiththesameMRN#beforecreatinganewtransit
inGTS

Cansomeonehelpmewiththestandardprocedureplease?

Thanks
Dhilipan

HelpfulAnswerbyMouazBENREDJEB

189Views

AverageUserRating
(0ratings)

MouazBENREDJEB Apr1,20159:57PM (inresponsetoDhilipanSundararajan)

HelpfulAnswer Re:GTSEWMNCTSprocess
HelloDhilipan,

InthefewprojectswhereIhaveparticipatedtoimplementNCTS,Ineverencounteredthecasewhere
EWMwasused.

SoIamtryingheretoansweryourquestionsbasedonmyproperexperienceeventhoughasstated
aboveIneverencounteredthecasewhereEWMwasinvolved.

http://scn.sap.com/thread/3721787

1/5

5/11/2015

GTSEWMNCTSprocess|SCN

Iwillfirststartbyansweringyour2ndquestion

.Indeed,GTSshould"aggregate"thedifferentIBDs

thatsharethesameT1/MRNnumber.Inotherwords,youshouldhaveauniqueTransitdeclarationin
GTSformultipleIBDwiththesameTx/MRNnumber.

Frommyexperience,theonlycaseweretheaggregationdidnotworkwaswhenahugenumberof
IBDswasupdatedsimulatenouslyinECCwiththesameMRNnumber(foronecustomer,wehad
sometimes50IBDsupdatedwiththesameMRNnumberthroughaZprograminasingleshot).In
suchcases,GTSdidnotcopewiththevolumeofdatareceivedandstartedtocreatemultipleTransit
documentsinsteadofaggregatingthembasedontheMRN.

Inthetestcaseyouhavedescribedinyourpost,whatwasthestatusofthe1stTransitdocument
(createdbytheIBD)whenthe2ndTransitdocument(createdbyEWM)wascreated?

Movingnowtoyourfirstquestion,ifyou/wedon'tfindthereasonwhytheIBDsarenotaggregated,
thenindeed"maybe"youwillhavetoentertheMRNonlyinEWM,"maybe".Inmyopinion,partof
theanswerisnottechnicalbutratherpractical:TheMRNhastobeenteredmanuallyintothesystem.
Doesthereceptiondepartmenthaveaccess/authorizations/knowledgetodoitdirectlyinEWM???

Regards.

MouazBENREDJEB

Like(0)

DhilipanSundararajan Apr1,201510:48PM (inresponsetoMouazBENREDJEB)

Re:GTSEWMNCTSprocess
HiMouaz,

Thanks.Nicetohearfromyourafteralongtime.

IhadthesameopiniononIBDsandTransitrelationship.

SAPisasmallworld .Ihadopportunitytocheckthesameprogram thatyouaredescribing


toupdateMRNformultipleIBDs.IndeeditsbecauseofhugevolumesandwhentheRFC
queuesstartprocessingsimultaneouslyitcreatesmultipletransits.Settingupdelaystatements
inthecustomtransactiondoesn'thelpalwayswhentherearetoomanyIBDsbeingprocessed
simultaneously.Ithinkwemustensurethereisatransitcreatedforthe1stIBDbeforeprocessing
withtheMRNupdatefor2ndone(Justafterthe1stoneisupdated).NotforallIBDsthough.Just
between1stand2ndone.

RegardingTransitstatus:

WhentheT1andMRNwasupdatedintheIBDinECC,wehadatransitcreatedreadyand
availableinGTS.Howeverarrivalnotificationwasnotsent.

InEWM,statusforthesameIBDwassetto"Inyard"AnewtransitgotcreatedinGTSwiththe
sameMRNwhichwasshockingforme.

Fewminutesbackwhenichecked(whichis4hourslatertocreationofthetransitbyEWM).Isee
achangelogbytheRFCuserfromEWMsystemhadcanceledtheTransitdeclaration.

CouldbesomeonehadremovedthedeliveryassignmentinEWM.Ineedtocheckandconfirm
this.

Myexpectationis

1)IfIupdatetheT1andMRNinECC,letthetransitbecreatedinGTS.ButwhenIsettheIBD"in
yard"statusinEWM,itshouldcheckwhetherthereisatransitavailablealreadyforthesame
MRNbeforecreationI'llexecutesomemoretestsandconfirmthis.

Thanksforyourinputsasalways

Regards
Dhilipan

Like(0)

MouazBENREDJEB Apr2,20158:47AM (inresponsetoDhilipanSundararajan)

Re:GTSEWMNCTSprocess
HiDhilipan,

http://scn.sap.com/thread/3721787

2/5

5/11/2015

GTSEWMNCTSprocess|SCN

IhadalookatthepieceofcodewheretheaggregationofMRNistakingplaceinGTS.

Ihaveseen2thingsthatcouldexplainyourissue:

(1)OtherthantheTx/MRNnumber,theaggregationlogictakesintoaccountotherthingslike
theLogicalsystem.SomaybetheaggregationisnotworkinginyourcasebecauseECC
andEWMarenotsharingthesameLogicalsystem?

(2)IBDstransferredtoGTSaremappedintable/SAPSLL/CORREF.Pleasetrytohavea
lookatthistable.Ifyoufind2entrieswiththesameIBDnumberthenmaybethereisa
mismatchinoneofthe"secondary"fieldsofthetablethatcouldexplainyourissue(e.g.
sameIBDnumberbutdifferentObjecttype,ReferenceApplication,etc...)

Regards.

MouazBENREDJEB

Like(0)

DhilipanSundararajan Apr7,20151:48PM (inresponsetoMouazBENREDJEB)

Re:GTSEWMNCTSprocess
HiMouaz,

Thanksforyourhelp

1)IthinkitwasjustthetimingissuetohavemultipletransitsforsameMRN.Itriedwitha
freshflowwithall3systemstogether.ThereisjustonetransitcreatedevenafterIsetin
yardstatusformyIBDinEWM.So,multipletransitissueisjustaveryrarecase.

2)IseeadifferenceintheCORREFtableupdatewithrespecttotheQALREF.
WheneveranIBDisreplicatedfromEWM,theQALREFissetasEXTIDFandnotas
EXTID.

ThisisleadingmetoanotherissueforwhichIamworkingwithSAP

So,whenmytransitiscreatedfromEWMsystemdirectly.WhichmeansIentertheT1
andMRNinEWMandsetthestatusas"Inyard"AtransitgetscreatedinGTS.This
transitiscreatedunderQALREFEXTIDFinCORREFtable.

WhenwegetintheTransitDisplayInboundactivitiestransactionandtrytofindoutthe
TransitwiththeInbounddeliverynumber.Itdoesn'tshowmytransitdeclaration
becausethestandardcodeisconsideringtheQALREFtobe"EXTID"alwayswhenwe
mentionthefeedersystemdata.

I'llkeepyoupostedifIgetanyresponsefromSAP.
Thanks
Dhilipan

Like(0)

DaveWillis Apr7,20153:57PM (inresponsetoDhilipanSundararajan)

Re:GTSEWMNCTSprocess
HiDhilipan,

That'sstrange,since(asfarasIcansee)thestandardcodeiscorrect.

IfyoulookintoFunctionModule/SAPSLL/MM0B_6800_TIBD_MAP_R3atline24,
you'llsee:

http://scn.sap.com/thread/3721787

3/5

5/11/2015

GTSEWMNCTSprocess|SCN

es_api_tibdqual_refno=gc_qalrefexternal_number.

Anddoubleclickingtheconstantshows:

constants:
beginofgc_qalref,
external_numbertypechar6value'EXTID',
external_number_flowtypechar6value'EXTIDF',
endofgc_qalref.

Areyousureyou'renotchangingthevalueintheBAdIoranywhereelse?

Regards,
Dave

Like(0)

DhilipanSundararajan Apr8,20154:36PM (inresponsetoDaveWillis)

Re:GTSEWMNCTSprocess
HiDave,

ThisworkswithEXTIDwhenmytransitisreplicatedfromECC.Inmycase,I
amfacingissueswhenthetransitisbeingreplicatedfromEWMsystem.

I'venotcheckedthecodeinEWMyet.Tobefrank,noclueonwhichcodeto
checkinEWM

Regards
Dhilipan

Like(0)

DaveWillis Apr6,201511:39PM (inresponsetoDhilipanSundararajan)

Re:GTSEWMNCTSprocess
HiDhilipan,

Apologiesforalateresponsehere(holidays)...

ToaddresstheissuewiththeRFC,takealookatNote1875119,createdforoneofmy
projectssometimeago.ItallowstheuseofqRFCinsteadoftheusualtRFC,andmakesa
worldofdifferencewhentryingtotransferlargenumbersofDeliveriestogether.

ObviouslythatNoteisforanERPfeedersystem,butmaybeSAPwouldalsoprovidethe
samefunctionalityforEWM(you'dneedtocreateanIncidenttomakethatrequest).

Regards,
Dave

Like(0)

DhilipanSundararajan Apr7,20151:53PM (inresponsetoDaveWillis)

Re:GTSEWMNCTSprocess
HiDave,

Thanksalot.We'vedonethischangealreadyinourECCsystem.Asyousaid,wemay
havetousesimilarlogicinEWMifwecomeacrossthesameissueinfuture.

Thanks
Dhilipan

Like(0)

http://scn.sap.com/thread/3721787

4/5

5/11/2015
Share

SiteIndex
Privacy

GTSEWMNCTSprocess|SCN
0

Tweet

ContactUs
TermsofUse

http://scn.sap.com/thread/3721787

0 Like

SAPHelpPortal
LegalDisclosure

Copyright

FollowSCN

5/5

You might also like