Analytic Approaches To Aesthetics (Oxford Bibliography)

Analytic Approaches to Aesthetics
Peter Lamarque
LAST MODIFIED: 10 MAY 2010
DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780195396577-0004
Introduction
Aesthetics is broadly that branch of philosophy concerned with fundamental questions about the nature
of beauty, the nature of art, and the principles of art criticism. Some of these questions go back to the
ancient Greeks, but systematic study of the foundations of aesthetics did not begin until the 18th
century. Analytic philosophers turned their attention to this branch of the subject relatively late and in the
1940s and 50s tended to be scornful of what they found (John Passmore famously wrote of the
dreariness of aesthetics in 1951 in the journal Mind). However, in the fifty years up to the turn of the
21st century, and beyond that point, analytic approaches to aesthetics developed with considerable
sophistication and there is now a huge literature on all aspects of the subject under the broad heading of
analytic aesthetics. Other approaches exist, of course, notably that associated with Continental
philosophy, which is more historically oriented. The analytic approach is rooted in the analysis of
concepts (albeit increasingly informed by work in the empirical sciences) and tends to examine issues
about the nature of art and the aesthetic qualities of objects in an ahistorical manner, even if noting and
evaluating ideas from earlier periods. In the years since the early 1990s there has been a notable
growth in attention to the individual arts (music, painting, literature, film, etc.). Important developments in
the aesthetics of nature and the environment have also occurred.
Anthologies
There are several collections of papers that give a thorough overview of analytical work in aesthetics,
showing the range of topics covered and current thinking about them. Lamarque and Olsen
2003 collects influential papers on analytic aesthetics from its first flowering in the 1950s up to the
present day. Schaper 1983 includes some contributions from analytic philosophers, such as John
McDowell, not usually associated with aesthetics. Gaut and Lopes 2005 and Levinson 2003between
them give fairly comprehensive and even-handed coverage of topics and ideas currently being debated,
written by leading specialists. Kivy 2004 offers longer and more polemical articles again by leading
contemporary figures, each developing and defending a particular point of view.Kieran 2005 usefully
explores core debates using pairs of specially written papers taking different sides on current
issues. Feagin and Maynard 1997 and Neill and Ridley 1995 are large and popular anthologies that
include but extend beyond the analytic, both offering a broader context historically and in terms of
methodology.
Feagin, Susan, and Patrick Maynard, eds. Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1997.
Save Citation Export Citation E-mail Citation
A useful and imaginative selection of papers and extracts with a wide historical and cross-cultural
sweep.
Find this resource:
Gaut, Berys, and Dominic McIver Lopes, eds. Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. 2d
ed. London: Routledge, 2005.
Parts II, III, and IV, on, respectively, aesthetic theory, issues and challenges, and the individual arts, are
detailed and accessible studies from an analytical point of view of key issues in aesthetics written by
prominent contemporary philosophers.
Find this resource:
Kieran, Matthew, ed. Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art.
Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.
Helpful format using pairs of commissioned articles taking different sides in current debates. Good for
seminar discussion, revealing where key disagreements lie.
Find this resource:
Kivy, Peter, ed. The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.
A useful collection of eighteen commissioned articles by contemporary aestheticians. The articles
present an overview of an area but also offer sometimes polemical perspectives on their subjects.
Find this resource:
Lamarque, Peter, and Stein Haugom Olsen, eds. Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art:
The Analytic Tradition; an Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.
A collection of forty-six papers representing some of the best and most influential work by analytic
philosophers in aesthetics from the 1950s to the present. Introductions to each section give a useful
overview.
Find this resource:
Levinson, Jerrold, ed. Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
2003.
Forty-eight specially commissioned articles, at an introductory level, on a wide range of topics in current
aesthetics, under the headings Background, General Issues in Aesthetics, Aesthetic Issues of Specific
Art Forms, and Further Directions in Aesthetics.
Find this resource:
Neill, Alex, and Aaron Ridley, eds. The Philosophy of Art: Readings Ancient and Modern.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
A judicious wide-ranging selection of material from 20th-century analytical writing back to the ancient
Greeks and also including Hume, Kant, Nietzsche, Tolstoy, Freud, Collingwood, and Adorno, among
others.
Find this resource:
Schaper, Eva, ed. Pleasure, Preference, and Value: Studies in Philosophical Aesthetics.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
A collection of commissioned papers by leading analytical philosophers, including John McDowell, Philip
Pettit, R. A. Sharpe, Anthony Savile, Ted Cohen, and Malcolm Budd. At times quite philosophically
demanding.
Find this resource:
Textbooks
There are plenty of general introductions to aesthetics, but not all are specifically focused on analytic
philosophy either in the topics discussed or in methodology. Carroll 1999 and Stecker 2005 are
especially helpful in exemplifying the use of analytical argument to clarify and assess theories about
art. Dickie 1997 is illuminating as a reflection on core themes of analytic aesthetics (also setting them in
their historical context), from an author who has made a major contribution to its development. Graham
2005 also sets the scene well, engaging with other approaches, for example, from Continental
philosophy. Lyas 1997 is a good introduction for beginners in philosophy, with engaging examples and
straightforward exposition. Townsend 1997 is more demanding but full of argument. Neill and Ridley
2007 uses a format that is highly effective for teaching: pairs of articles taking different sides in a debate.
Carroll, Nol. Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. London: Routledge. 1999.

An accessible and clearly written introduction to some of the main theories of art, with carefully argued
critical analyses of each.
Find this resource:
Dickie, George. Introduction to Aesthetics: An Analytic Approach. New York: Oxford

University Press, 1997.
Analyzes key elements in the history of aesthetics from ancient Greece to modern times, but mostly
introduces and reflects on analytical developments in the 20th century.
Find this resource:
Graham, Gordon. Philosophy of the Arts: An Introduction to Aesthetics. 3d ed. London:

Routledge, 2005.
A popular and readable introduction including substantial chapters on music, the visual arts, literature,
the performing arts, architecture, and the aesthetics of nature. Also engages with the likes of Marx,
Nietzsche, and Derrida.
Find this resource:
Lyas, Colin. Aesthetics. London: UCL, 1997.

Reaches out to a wide audience, with examples from popular as well as classical arts. Introduces issues
in a lively manner, giving particular emphasis to expression in art.
Find this resource:
Neill, Alex, and Aaron Ridley, eds. Arguing About Art: Contemporary Philosophical
Debates. 3d ed. London: Routledge, 2007.
Each of the three editions of this influential and useful textbook has contained different selections of
papers. Useful format of juxtaposing articles offering opposing points of view on a range of topics.
Find this resource:
Stecker, Robert. Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art: An Introduction. Lanham, MD:
Rowman and Littlefield, 2005.
Especially helpful for displaying the analytical mode of argument in aesthetics; careful considerations
are given for and against a wide range of positions with useful summaries at the end of each chapter.
Find this resource:
Townsend, Dabney. An Introduction to Aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.

A thoughtful introduction to selected issues, with a focus on relations between works of art, artists, and
audiences.
Find this resource:
Landmark Works
There are certain landmark works in the second half of the 20th century that stand out as especially
influential in the development of analytic approaches to aesthetics. Elton 1954 brought together papers
on aesthetics from prominent analytic philosophers; its polemical purpose was to show, in effect, how
aesthetics ought to be done. Beardsley 1958, a large and comprehensive work, illustrated that the
analytic approach need not be small-scale and piecemeal (as some of the contributors in Elton
1954 had suggested); it proposed that aesthetics should be metacriticism, a second-order study of the
principles of art criticism, but actually turned out to be more ambitious than that itself, with a wideranging account of how the arts fit into human life. Sibley 1959 turned attention to aesthetic concepts
applied to art and other objects (and significantly went beyond the 18th-century fixation with beauty
alone). Danto 1964 and Danto 1981 moved in a different direction, away from the aesthetic qualities of
art toward its social or institutional groundings, a move taken up in Dickie 1974 that offered the first fully
worked out institutional definition of art.Goodman 1968 introduced to aesthetics the rigorous style of a
prominent Harvard logician; no adequate theory of pictorial representation could fail to engage with its
controversial view of representation as a mode of denotation. Wollheim 1968 in a concise and readable
form addressed fundamental issues about the ontology of art and the form of life in which it gets its
meaning. Finally, the monumental Walton 1990, offering a unified account of many issues through the
idea of make-believe, is notable not just for its influence in aesthetics but for its impact in other areas
of philosophy (e.g., philosophy of mind and language).
Beardsley, Monroe C. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. New York:

Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1958.
An early and highly influential full-scale treatment of aesthetics from the analytic perspective. Reflects
on all the arts and on problems of interpretation and evaluation.
Find this resource:
Danto, Arthur C. The Artworld. Journal of Philosophy 61 (1964): 571584.

DOI: 10.2307/2022937Save Citation Export Citation E-mail Citation
Introduces the idea of an artworld and argues that what makes something a work of art rests not on
what it looks like, but on its role within a social and intellectual milieu. Uses Andy Warhols Brillo Boxes
to illustrate his argument.
Find this resource:
Danto, Arthur C. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard

Full development of Dantos important conception of art, deploying the method of indiscernibles.
Find this resource:
Dickie, George. Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. Ithaca, NY: Cornell
Presents Dickies original version of the institutional definition of art, which remains influential even
though he refined the theory in later writings.
Find this resource:
Elton, William, ed. Aesthetics and Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 1954.

An early collection of papersseveral by prominent philosophers such as Gilbert Ryle, Stuart
Hampshire, O. K. Bouwsma, and John Passmoreillustrating and promoting analytical methods in
aesthetics.
Find this resource:
Goodman, Nelson. Languages of Art: An Approach to a General Theory of Symbols.

Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1968.
A difficult but immensely important book by an eminent Harvard philosopher and logician, giving art a
central role in human cognition, alongside science, and exploring its complex modes of denotation and
symbolism.
Find this resource:
Sibley, Frank. Aesthetic Concepts. Philosophical Review 68 (1959): 421450.

A careful analysis of aesthetic concepts, such as unified, balanced, delicate, etc., pointing out their
logical peculiarities in contrast to nonaesthetic concepts, such as red, square, etc. Important both for its
content and its methodology. Reprinted in Sibleys Approaches to Aesthetics: Collected Papers on
Philosophical Aesthetics, edited by John Benson, Betty Redfern, and Jeremy Roxbee Cox (Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2001).
Find this resource:
Walton, Kendall L. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the

Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
An impressive unified account of artistic representationwith applications to pictures, fictionality, and
ontologyusing the core idea of games of make-believe. Waltons make-believe theory has been
taken up in areas of philosophy well beyond aesthetics.
Find this resource:
Wollheim, Richard. Art and Its Objects: An Introduction to Aesthetics. New York: Harper
and Row, 1968.
Influential reflections on the ontology of art and the role of seeing as in artistic representation by a
preeminent figure in analytic aesthetics. A second edition was published by Cambridge University Press
in 1980 with six supplementary essays developing its central themes.
Find this resource:
Defining Art
It is often thought, though not universally so, that giving a definition of art is a necessary first stage to
any adequate philosophy of art. Efforts in this endeavor are helpfully summarized in Adajian 2007 and,
at greater length, in Davies 1991, which attempts to categorize different kinds of definitions. Weitz
1956 famously argues that the very exercise is misguided, given the creative nature of art. Gaut 2000 is
a bridge between Weitzs anti-essentialism and those that propose full-scale definitions. Other
philosophical works, notably Dickie 1983 and Levinson 1979, have insisted that a definition is possible,
once formulated in the right terms. Carroll 2001 does not think a definition as such is possible, but
proposes an account of how we identify artworks, particularly those of a disputed kind, by means of
narratives connecting them to earlier works. Beardsley 1983offers a definition in terms of aesthetic
experience, although, as he recognizes, Beardsleys account does not readily fit conceptual art or other
kinds of avant-garde works. Carroll 2000 is a collection of papers showing contemporary philosophers
addressing the definitional issue and presenting a state-of-the-art survey of the different candidates on
offer.
Adajian, Thomas. The Definition of Art. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Edited by Edward N. Zalta. 2007.
A useful and accessible critical summary of the principal approaches.
Find this resource:
Beardsley, Monroe C. An Aesthetic Definition of Art. In What Is Art? Edited by Hugh

Curtler. New York: Haven, 1983.
A leading early figure in analytic aesthetics who defines art as follows: An artwork is something
produced with the intention of giving it the capacity to satisfy the aesthetic interest. Reprinted
inLamarque and Olsen 2003.
Find this resource:
Carroll, Nol, ed. Theories of Art Today. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2000.
Twelve essays by prominent contemporary philosophers on different aspects of the definitional issue. A
helpful overview and key text in analytic aesthetics.
Find this resource:
Carroll, Nol. Historical Narratives and the Philosophy of Art. In Beyond Aesthetics:
Philosophical Essays. By Nol Carroll, 100117. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,
2001.
Defends the idea of identifying artespecially avant-garde artby means of historical narratives that
connect contested works to art history in a way that discloses that the mutations in question are part of
the evolving species of art.
Find this resource:
Davies, Stephen. Definitions of Art. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.
A wide-ranging critical assessment of different approaches to the definition of art, notably in terms of
functional and procedural theories. Clearly written in nontechnical terms.
Find this resource:
Dickie, George. The New Institutional Theory of Art. Proceedings of the 8th
International Wittgenstein Symposium 10 (1983): 5764.
A succinct statement of the revised version of Dickies influential institutional definition. Shows clearly
what the institutional theory seeks to achieve. Reprinted in Lamarque and Olsen 2003.
Find this resource:
Gaut, Berys. Art as a Cluster Concept. In Theories of Art Today. Edited by Nol
Carroll, 2544. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2000.
A version of family resemblance views, arguing that among a cluster of putative features of art, no one
is necessary but all, or a subclass, are sufficient.
Find this resource:
Levinson, Jerrold. Defining Art Historically. British Journal of Aesthetics 19 (1979):

232250.
DOI: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/19.3.232Save Citation Export Citation E-mail Citation

Develops a definition of art in terms of the relation of a work to previous works already acknowledged as
art. Quite technical. Reprinted in Levinsons Music, Art, and Metaphysics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University
Press, 1990).
Find this resource:
Weitz, Morris. The Role of Theory in Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism 15 (1956): 2735.
Highly influential statement of anti-essentialism, rejecting the attempt to define art, on the grounds that
art is an open concept. Reprinted in Lamarque and Olsen 2003.
Find this resource:
Ontology of Art
The ontology of art raises questions about what kind of thing works of art are, to what ontological
category they belong. A simple and standard view is that there is no single category to which all works
belong but that some works, such as paintings, carved sculptures, and buildings, are particulars (e.g.,
physical objects), whereas other works, such as poems, symphonies, and dramas, are abstract entities
of some kind, allowing for multiple instantiations. Wollheim 1980 importantly explains the latter class by
invoking the distinction between types and tokens; thus, a poem or a symphony is a type, of which
individual copies or performances are tokens. Wolterstorff 1980 offers a variant of this theory, referring
not to types but to norm-kinds. Other philosophers place artworks into a single category. Thus, Currie
1989 sees all works as types, that is, types of action, the action of discovering a structure through a
heuristic path. Davies 2004 takes a similar line, although identifying works with token performances
(art-making). Margolis 1980 sees works of art as emergent entities never identical to their physical
embodiment. Rohrbaugh 2005 offers a detailed survey and assessment of these and other ideas,
and Thomasson 2004 provides judicious comments on how one might arbitrate in the debates.
Currie, Gregory. An Ontology of Art. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan, 1989.

Defends a unified but controversial view of artworks as action types. Illuminating arguments against
opposing views, notably the idea of aesthetic empiricism, but technical in its logical apparatus.
Find this resource:
Davies, David. Art as Performance. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.

A difficult, philosophically sophisticated book that gets deep into the ontological debate and develops a
striking and original thesis about what works of art are.
Find this resource:
Margolis, Joseph. Art and Philosophy: Conceptual Issues in Philosophy. Atlantic

Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1980.
Defends the view that works of art are culturally emergent entities that are embodied in physical
objects but not identical to those objects.
Find this resource:
Rohrbaugh, Guy. Ontology of Art. In Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. 2d ed.

Edited by B. Gaut and D. M. Lopes, 241254. London: Routledge, 2005.
A scholarly, wide-ranging account of the issues in ontology of art and the arguments for the main
positions.
Find this resource:
Thomasson, Amie L. The Ontology of Art. In The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics. Edited
by Peter Kivy, 7892. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.
Helpful and accessible survey of the key issues, with reflections on the constraints on any adequate
ontological theory.
Find this resource:
Wollheim, Richard. Art and Its Objects. 2d ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press, 1980.
Important work by a prominent philosopher. Uses the type-token distinction to explain the relation
between certain kinds of works and individual copies or performances.
Find this resource:
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. Works and Worlds of Art. Oxford: Clarendon, 1980.

A careful but difficult analytical study of a range of issues in the ontology of art defending the view that
musical and literary works, among others, are norm-kinds.
Find this resource:
Aesthetic Properties and Aesthetic Experience

A central issue for analytic aestheticians has been the nature of, indeed the very reality of, aesthetic
properties and aesthetic experiences. The topics are relatedaesthetic experiences are sometimes
thought to be experiences directed to the aesthetic qualities of objectsbut can also be treated
separately. Focus has been given to the reality or otherwise of aesthetic properties, the extent to which
they genuinely adhere in objects rather than being merely projected onto them.Levinson
2001 and Zemach 1997 make the case for realism, suitably qualified. Sibley 2001 looks at what
objectivity amounts to in aesthetics, and Bender 2003 expresses skepticism about realism.Walton
1970 is a highly influential contribution showing how the perception of aesthetic qualities in art depends
on the categories to which works are assigned. Iseminger 2003 surveys the issues surrounding
aesthetic experience, not least being the important treatment by Beardsley, for example, in Beardsley
1982. Dickie 1964 attacks Beardsleys earlier theory of the aesthetic attitude, but Carroll 2002 brings
the discussion up to date by reassessing the options for any adequate account of aesthetic experience.
Beardsley, Monroe C. Aesthetic Experience. In The Aesthetic Point of View: Selected

Essays. Edited by Michael Wreen and Donald Callen. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982.
A clear statement of the importance of aesthetic experience by one of its foremost defenders among
analytic aestheticians.
Find this resource:
Bender, John W. Aesthetic Realism 2. In Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Edited by

Jerrold Levinson, 8098. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
A good survey of the topic, concluding that the case for aesthetic realism, that is, realism about
aesthetic properties, has not been made.
Find this resource:
Carroll, Nol. Aesthetic Experience Revisited. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (2002):

145168.
Revives interest in aesthetic experience and defends a content-based view, in terms of the kinds of
objects toward which aesthetic experiences are directed, in favor of affect- or value-based theories.
Find this resource:
Dickie, George. The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude. American Philosophical

Quarterly 1 (1964): 5666.
Influential paper rejecting the idea that there is a distinctive aesthetic attitudea paper largely
responsible for the subsequent decline of interest in this idea.
Find this resource:
Iseminger, Gary. Aesthetic Experience. In Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Edited by

Jerrold Levinson, 99116. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
A clear and comprehensive overview of the principal positions on aesthetic experience.
Find this resource:
Levinson, Jerrold. Aesthetic Properties, Evaluative Force, and Differences of

Sensibility. InAesthetic Concepts: Essays After Sibley. Edited by Emily Brady and Jerrold
Levinson, 6180. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
A defense of aesthetic realism in terms of dispositions in objects to afford distinctive phenomenal
experiences, which are separable from evaluative attitudes taken to those experiences. Quite
demanding.
Find this resource:
Sibley, Frank. Objectivity and Aesthetics. In Approaches to Aesthetics: Collected

Papers on Philosophical Aesthetics. Edited by John Benson, Betty Redfern, and Jeremy Roxbee
Cox, 7187. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
A nuanced defense of objectivity in aesthetic judgments and reflections on when it might be legitimate to
speak of aesthetic properties.
Find this resource:
Walton, Kendall L. Categories of Art. Philosophical Review 79 (1970): 334367.

Argues, with ramifications right across aesthetics, that the perception of aesthetic qualities in a work of
art rests not only on the intrinsic perceptual qualities of the work itself but also on facts about its
provenance and context, not the least being the category to which it belongs.
Find this resource:
Zemach, Eddy. Real Beauty. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.
A thorough-going but technically difficult defense of aesthetic realism.
Find this resource:
Meaning and Interpretation

Given the nature of analytic philosophy, it is not surprising that questions of meaning have been
prominent in debates in aesthetics. A key question has centered on the aims of interpretation in art (and
literary) criticism. Is the interpreters aim to recover what was in the mind of the artist or perhaps to put a
creative construction on the work to reveal its full potentialities regardless of whether the artist had
thought through all the possibilities? The papers in Margolis and Rockmore 2000 produce a useful
overview of the subtleties of the debate, as does Barnes 1988, although the latter can be quite
demanding with its logical formulations. Krausz 2002 lays out reasoned defenses of different positions
by prominent contributors. Iseminger 1992 and Livingston 2007tackle the specific question of the role of
intention in interpretation, and Stecker 1997 defends a version of intentionalism.
Barnes, Annette. On Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.

An analytical study of validity in interpretive reasoning and the limits of objectivity and truth in
interpretations.
Find this resource:
Iseminger, Gary, ed. Intention and Interpretation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
1992.
An important collection of essays on the intention debate in aesthetics, including arguments for and
against actual intentionalism and hypothetical intentionalism.
Find this resource:
Krausz, Michael, ed. Is There a Single Right Interpretation? University Park:

Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002.
Commissioned papers on the focused question in the book title. Wide-ranging in its applications.
Find this resource:
Livingston, Paisley. Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 2007.

Defends the importance of intention in the creation of art, and thus what we understand by art, and
proposes partial intentionalism in art interpretation.
Find this resource:
Margolis, Joseph, and Tom Rockmore, eds. The Philosophy of Interpretation. Oxford:
Blackwell, 2000.
Commissioned papers on different aspects of interpretation, offering a broad perspective on the
principal issues.
Find this resource:
Stecker, Robert. Artworks: Definition, Meaning, Value. University Park: Pennsylvania

State University Press, 1997.
A careful study of different aspects of meaning in the arts, proposing that an important core of meaning
in literary works is utterance meaning.
Find this resource:
Art and Knowledge

The question of whether it is a central aim or achievement of art to advance knowledge, for example,
about human psychology or human nature, is hotly debated. The question is not so much the factual
one, whether people do actually learn from works of art, but rather whether art can provide a special
route to knowledge, which gives art a distinctive value. Stolnitz 1992 is skeptical about artistic truth,
and Lamarque 2006 expresses caution about giving undue weight to knowledge as a core value of art.
In contrast, Gaut 2003 and some papers in Kieran and Lopes 2007 make the case for arts role in
human cognition, whereas Nussbaum 1990 and John 1998promote the special cognitive powers of
literature.
Gaut, Berys. Art and Knowledge. In Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Edited by Jerrold
A critical analysis of pro- and anti-cognitivist arguments, defending a pro-cognitivist stance.
Find this resource:
John, Eileen. Reading Fiction and Conceptual Knowledge: Philosophical Thought in

Literary Context. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56 (1998): 331348.
A nuanced and subtle defense of the view that works of literature can enhance conceptual knowledge.
Find this resource:
Kieran, Matthew, and Dominic Lopes, eds. Knowing Art: Essays in Aesthetics and
Epistemology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 2007.
A useful collection of papers covering literature and the visual arts and assessing the claims made for
arts cognitive potential.
Find this resource:
Lamarque, Peter. Cognitive Values in the Arts: Marking the Boundaries.

In Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. Edited by Matthew Kieran,
127139. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.
Advances the anti-cognitivist case by raising doubts that advancing knowledge is a genuine artistic
value.
Find this resource:
Nussbaum, Martha. Loves Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. New York:
Oxford University Press, 1990.
A selection of Nussbaums essays sharing the general theme that literature can enrich human moral
sensibility and educate the emotions.
Find this resource:
Stolnitz, Jerome. On the Cognitive Triviality of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 32

(1992): 191200.
A brief and lively attack on the view that art, particularly literature, can offer substantial truths.
Find this resource:
Values of Art
Philosophers ask how the values of art relate to other values and also what criteria are available for
making judgments about individual works. The question of whether artistic value can be a subject of
objective reasoning is also prominent. Lamarque 2009 offers general observations about these issues,
and Budd 1995 gives a sophisticated survey of competing theories as well as developing a novel
account. Goldman 1995 also proposes its own subtle view of aesthetic and artistic value. Savile
1982 explains and defends the test of time as a criterion of value. Sibley 2001examines the role of
reasons in aesthetic judgments, but Goldman 2006 argues that such judgments are not subject to
general principles. Gaut 2007 tackles a much debated issue, advancing the case for the relevance of
ethical values in some assessments of aesthetic value.
Budd, Malcolm. Values of Art: Pictures, Poetry, and Music. London: Penguin, 1995.
Important but philosophically demanding book, partly a critical analysis of principal views, partly the
presentation of a specific thesis, defining value in art in terms of the intrinsic values of certain
experiences of art.
Find this resource:
Gaut, Berys. Art, Emotion, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
A rigorous and sustained argument for the view that aesthetic evaluations of art can partially rest on
moral evaluations.
Find this resource:
Goldman, Alan H. Aesthetic Value. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1995.

Wide-ranging, clearly written presentation of key issues developing a line of argument, with
considerable refinement, that originates in Hume and Kant.
Find this resource:
Goldman, Alan H. There Are No Aesthetic Principles. In Contemporary Debates in

Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. Edited by Matthew Kieran, 299312. Oxford: Blackwell,
2006.
A spirited and readable defense of the claim that there are no general principles governing aesthetic
evaluations.
Find this resource:
Lamarque, Peter. Artistic Value. In Central Issues of Philosophy. Edited by John

Shand, 231243. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
An accessible introduction to the kinds of issues about artistic value raised by analytic philosophers.
Find this resource:
Savile, Anthony. The Test of Time: An Essay in Philosophical Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford
A fascinating and richly argued defense of the idea of the test of time as a criterion for artistic value.
Find this resource:
Sibley, Frank. General Criteria and Reasons in Aesthetics. In Approaches to

Aesthetics: Collected Papers on Philosophical Aesthetics. Edited by John Benson, Betty
Redfern, and Jeremy Roxbee Cox, 104118. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
A nuanced discussion of Monroe Beardsleys view that there are general criteria for aesthetic
evaluations, putting forth a limited case for such criteria.
Find this resource:
Analytic Aesthetics and the Individual Arts

A notable feature of aesthetics in the early 21st century has been the attention given to the individual
arts. Thus, for example, the philosophy of music, the philosophy of the visual arts, and the philosophy of
literature are now important subbranches of aesthetics with their own distinctive debates and problems.
Music
Prominent issues in the philosophy of music concern musical expressiveness, music and meaning, and
the ontology of music. For an excellent and opinionated overview of the field, the best starting point
is Scruton 1997. Kivy 1993 is a collection of papers by Peter Kivy, a major contributor to all aspects of
the subject. Budd 1985 explores theories of emotion in music in a mostly critical vein but is a good
foundation for subsequent work. Davies 1994 examines meaning in music, usefully identifying the main
issues. Levinson 1980 initiated a large and continuing literature on the ontology of music, notably on the
consequences of taking musical works to be abstract entities.Dodd 2007 is a full-length challenge to
Levinson, even rejecting the view that musical works are strictly created (rather than discovered).
Budd, Malcolm. Music and the Emotions: The Philosophical Theories. London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1985.
A rigorous analytical study of prominent theories of how music relates to the emotions. Budds criticisms
leave many of these theories in tatters.
Find this resource:
Davies, Stephen. Musical Meaning and Expression. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press,
1994.
A thorough examination of arguments for and against the view that music is a kind of language.
Find this resource:
Dodd, Julian. Works of Music: An Essay in Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
2007.
A lively but controversial defense of the Platonist idea that musical works are abstract, eternal types, the
tokens of which gain their identity entirely through certain sorts of audible properties.
Find this resource:
Kivy, Peter. The Fine Art of Repetition: Essays in the Philosophy of Music. Cambridge,
UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Kivy is a leading analytical philosopher of music and this contains many of his most influential papers,
for example, on musical Platonism, opera, and music and emotion.
Find this resource:
Levinson, Jerrold. What a Musical Work Is. Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980): 528.
A highly influential essay on musical ontology, sometimes technical in content, arguing that musical
works are abstract entities but also genuinely created, not just discovered. Reprinted in
Levinsons Music, Art, and Metaphysics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990).
Find this resource:
Scruton, Roger. The Aesthetics of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Covers all aspects of the philosophy of music in a clear, readable style; written by a prominent
philosopher with a profound knowledge and love of music.
Find this resource:
Pictorial Art
A large amount has been written by philosophers on the nature of depiction, how two-dimensional
pictures can represent objects, real or fictional. The simple idea that pictures represent by resembling
their subject matter has come in for serious criticism, not least in Goodman 1976, although Hopkins
1999 gives a sophisticated reappraisal. Goodman 1976 rejects resemblance in favor of denotation,
and Wollheim 1998 explains representation in terms of a special kind of perception, seeing in,
whereas Lopes 1996 focuses on the relation between representation and interpretation. Walton
2008 famously appeals to games of make-believe in the perception of pictures and argues for the
transparency of photography. Scruton 1983 controversially argues that photographs are not
representations at all. Dutton 1983 is a fascinating collection of papers on forgery that in different ways
reveal important aspects of pictures and why they are valued.
Dutton, Denis, ed. The Forgers Art: Forgery and the Philosophy of Art. Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1983.
An important and engaging collection of essays, including extracts from Nelson GoodmansLanguages
of Art, in which he distinguishes arts that are autographic (i.e., forgeable) from the allographic (i.e.,
nonforgeable).
Find this resource:
Goodman, Nelson. Reality Remade. In Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of

Symbols. 2d ed. By Nelson Goodman, 39. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1976.
Accessible chapter expounding Goodmans theory of pictorial representation and his attack on
resemblance theories. Reprinted in The Philosophy of the Visual Arts, edited by Philip Alperson (Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1992).
Find this resource:
Hopkins, Robert. Picture, Image, and Experience: A Philosophical Inquiry. Cambridge,

UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Subtle defense of a version of the resemblance theory in terms of experienced resemblance and outline
shape.
Find this resource:
Lopes, Dominic McIver. Understanding Pictures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
A thoughtful and original study of many aspects of pictorial representation, including what it is to
recognize an object in a picture.
Find this resource:
Scruton, Roger. Photography and Representation. In The Aesthetic Understanding:

Essays in the Philosophy of Art and Culture. By Roger Scruton, 102126. London: Methuen,
1983.
An often cited, controversial essay arguing that photography is not a form of representation and in that
regard differs radically from painting. Reprinted in Lamarque and Olsen 2003.
Find this resource:
Walton, Kendall L. Marvelous Images: On Values and the Arts. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 2008.
A handy selection of Waltons papers in aesthetics, including six important contributions on pictures and
photography.
Find this resource:
Wollheim, Richard. On Pictorial Representation. Journal of Aesthetics and Art

Criticism 56 (1998): 217226.
A clear statement of Wollheims influential view of seeing in to explain pictorial representation, and his
reasons for rejecting alternative theories. Reprinted in Lamarque and Olsen 2003.
Find this resource:
Literature
For a good overview of topics in the philosophy of literature, see Davies 2007, Lamarque 2009,
and John and Lopes 2004. Olsen 1987 positions literary aesthetics in relation to literary theory and
takes a polemical stand in favor of an institutional view of literature. Lamarque and Olsen 1994 is a
lengthy treatment of the issue of how fiction and literature relate to truth. Searle 1979 is an important
paper on the logic of fiction, applying speech act theory, and Radford 1975 offers an entertaining and
extensively debated argument that it is irrational to respond emotionally to fictional characters.
Davies, David. Aesthetics and Literature. London: Continuum, 2007.

Clear and informative critical survey of some key issues in the philosophy of literature.
Find this resource:
John, Eileen, and Dominic M. Lopes, eds. Philosophy of Literature: Contemporary and
Classic Readings; an Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.
An accessible collection of forty-five essays and extracts, by prominent philosophers, covering all
aspects of the philosophy of literature.
Find this resource:
Lamarque, Peter. The Philosophy of Literature. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.

A comprehensive introduction to the principal issues in an accessible style using numerous examples
from literature and criticism.
Find this resource:
Lamarque, Peter, and Stein Haugom Olsen. Truth, Fiction, and Literature: A
Philosophical Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
A detailed examination of the role of truth in relation to literature, arguing that truth is not a primary
literary value.
Find this resource:
Olsen, Stein Haugom. The End of Literary Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press, 1987.
A collection of Olsens papers on literary aesthetics, showing pioneering work in the analytic tradition.
Find this resource:
Radford, Colin. How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina? Proceedings of
the Aristotelian Society 69 (1975): 6780.
An entertaining and controversial paper arguing that although it is quite natural, it is also irrational to
become emotionally involved with characters we know to be fictional. Reprinted in Lamarque and Olsen
2003.
Find this resource:
Searle, John. The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse. In Expression and Meaning.
By John Searle, 5875. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
Applies speech act theory to fiction, arguing that fiction writers pretend to perform illocutionary acts,
without intended deception.
Find this resource:
Other Art Forms

Carroll 2008 surveys philosophical issues about film, and Carroll 1998 analyzes mass or popular art in
all its forms. Both provide state-of-the-art treatment within analytic philosophy. Among discussions of
other arts that have captured the attention of analytic philosophers, Friday 2002 on
photography, Hamilton 2007 on theater, Hopkins 2003 on sculpture, and Sparshott 2004 on dance each
provide a useful overview and offer further readings.
Carroll, Nol. A Philosophy of Mass Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
A magisterial treatment of a complex and controversial subject, the status and value of popular arts. It
takes on much current theorizing, for example, in cultural studies, and presents a compelling alternative
using the methods of analytic philosophy.
Find this resource:
Carroll, Nol. The Philosophy of Motion Pictures. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008.

A lucid and informative account of the philosophy of film by the preeminent authority. Carrolls own work
on film, for over twenty-five years, has more or less defined this branch of aesthetics.
Find this resource:
Friday, Jonathan. Aesthetics and Photography. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2002.

Both an overview of central philosophical issues about photography and a development of a distinctive
point of view.
Find this resource:
Hamilton, James, R. The Art of Theater. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2007.

Rare as a full-length treatment of theater from an analytic philosopher. An important contribution,
arguing that theatrical performance is an independent art form.
Find this resource:
Hopkins, Robert. Sculpture. In Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Edited by Jerrold

A succinct and informative account of the philosophical issues involving sculpture: a subject largely
neglected by analytic philosophers.
Find this resource:
Sparshott, Francis. Dance: Bodies in Motion, Bodies at Rest. In The Blackwell Guide
to Aesthetics. Edited by Peter Kivy, 276290. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.
Sketches in a readable manner a framework for a philosophy of dance and the sorts of questions that
arise.
Find this resource:
Nature and the Environment

Hepburn 1966 is often said to be the start of modern analytical interest in the aesthetics of nature.Brady
2003, Carlson 2008, Parsons 2008, and Berleant and Carlson 2004 between them cover all aspects of
this burgeoning branch of aesthetics and provide a comprehensive overview. Carlson 2000 and Budd
2002 are good samples of the work of two of the leading analytic contributors.Saito 2007 introduces a
relatively new application of the aesthetics of the environment in looking at aesthetic responses to
everyday objects and situations.
Berleant, Arnold, and Allen Carlson, eds. The Aesthetics of Natural Environments.
Peterborough, ON: Broadview, 2004.
A useful and accessible collection of essays, old and new, on all aspects of this branch of aesthetics.
Find this resource:
Brady, Emily. Aesthetics of the Natural Environment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University

Press, 2003.
A clearly written and comprehensive introduction to and analysis of the central issues. A good place to
start for those who dont know the field.
Find this resource:
Budd, Malcolm. The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
2002.
A collection of Budds own influential papers on the aesthetics of nature. Sometimes demanding in their
analytical style but always rewarding.
Find this resource:
Carlson, Allen. Aesthetics and the Environment: The Appreciation of Nature, Art, and
Architecture. London: Routledge, 2000.
Carlson is one of the foremost aestheticians writing on the aesthetics of nature. This book consolidates
his own influential position and reflects judiciously on current debates in the subject.
Find this resource:
Carlson, Allen. Environmental Aesthetics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of

Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. 2008.
A lively, readable, and informative survey by a preeminent contributor to the whole field of the aesthetics
of the environment.
Find this resource:
Hepburn, Ronald Contemporary Aesthetics and the Neglect of Natural Beauty.

In British Analytical Philosophy. Edited by Bernard Williams and Alan Montefiore, 285310.
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966.
A much cited early exploration, within analytic philosophy, of aesthetics applied to the natural world.
Helped to launch interest in environmental aesthetics.
Find this resource:
Parsons, Glenn. Aesthetics and Nature. London: Continuum, 2008.

A clearly written and informative introduction to the philosophical debates.
Find this resource:
Saito, Yuriko. Everyday Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

An illuminating introduction and contribution to a growing branch of aesthetics, concerning aesthetic
responses to ordinary objects and everyday situations.
Find this resource:
back to top

Analytic Approaches To Aesthetics (Oxford Bibliography)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analytic Approaches To Aesthetics (Oxford Bibliography)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analytic Approaches To Aesthetics (Oxford Bibliography)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analytic Approaches to Aesthetics

LAST MODIFIED: 10 MAY 2010

Find this resource:

Carroll, Nol. Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. London: Routledge. 1999.

Dickie, George. Introduction to Aesthetics: An Analytic Approach. New York: Oxford

Find this resource:

Graham, Gordon. Philosophy of the Arts: An Introduction to Aesthetics. 3d ed. London:

Lyas, Colin. Aesthetics. London: UCL, 1997.

Townsend, Dabney. An Introduction to Aesthetics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997.

Beardsley, Monroe C. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. New York:

Danto, Arthur C. The Artworld. Journal of Philosophy 61 (1964): 571584.

Danto, Arthur C. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard

Elton, William, ed. Aesthetics and Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 1954.

Goodman, Nelson. Languages of Art: An Approach to a General Theory of Symbols.

Sibley, Frank. Aesthetic Concepts. Philosophical Review 68 (1959): 421450.

Walton, Kendall L. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the

Adajian, Thomas. The Definition of Art. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Beardsley, Monroe C. An Aesthetic Definition of Art. In What Is Art? Edited by Hugh

Levinson, Jerrold. Defining Art Historically. British Journal of Aesthetics 19 (1979):

DOI: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/19.3.232Save Citation Export Citation E-mail Citation

Currie, Gregory. An Ontology of Art. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan, 1989.

Davies, David. Art as Performance. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.

Margolis, Joseph. Art and Philosophy: Conceptual Issues in Philosophy. Atlantic

Rohrbaugh, Guy. Ontology of Art. In Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. 2d ed.

Wolterstorff, Nicholas. Works and Worlds of Art. Oxford: Clarendon, 1980.

Aesthetic Properties and Aesthetic Experience

Beardsley, Monroe C. Aesthetic Experience. In The Aesthetic Point of View: Selected

Bender, John W. Aesthetic Realism 2. In Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Edited by

Carroll, Nol. Aesthetic Experience Revisited. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (2002):

Dickie, George. The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude. American Philosophical

Iseminger, Gary. Aesthetic Experience. In Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Edited by

Levinson, Jerrold. Aesthetic Properties, Evaluative Force, and Differences of

Sibley, Frank. Objectivity and Aesthetics. In Approaches to Aesthetics: Collected

Walton, Kendall L. Categories of Art. Philosophical Review 79 (1970): 334367.

Meaning and Interpretation

Barnes, Annette. On Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.

Krausz, Michael, ed. Is There a Single Right Interpretation? University Park:

Save Citation Export Citation E-mail Citation

Stecker, Robert. Artworks: Definition, Meaning, Value. University Park: Pennsylvania

Art and Knowledge

John, Eileen. Reading Fiction and Conceptual Knowledge: Philosophical Thought in

Lamarque, Peter. Cognitive Values in the Arts: Marking the Boundaries.

Find this resource:

Stolnitz, Jerome. On the Cognitive Triviality of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 32

Goldman, Alan H. Aesthetic Value. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1995.

Goldman, Alan H. There Are No Aesthetic Principles. In Contemporary Debates in

Lamarque, Peter. Artistic Value. In Central Issues of Philosophy. Edited by John

Sibley, Frank. General Criteria and Reasons in Aesthetics. In Approaches to

Analytic Aesthetics and the Individual Arts

Goodman, Nelson. Reality Remade. In Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of

Hopkins, Robert. Picture, Image, and Experience: A Philosophical Inquiry. Cambridge,

Scruton, Roger. Photography and Representation. In The Aesthetic Understanding:

Wollheim, Richard. On Pictorial Representation. Journal of Aesthetics and Art

Davies, David. Aesthetics and Literature. London: Continuum, 2007.

Lamarque, Peter. The Philosophy of Literature. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.

Other Art Forms

Carroll, Nol. The Philosophy of Motion Pictures. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008.

Friday, Jonathan. Aesthetics and Photography. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2002.