30 Vijaykumar Etal
30 Vijaykumar Etal
30 Vijaykumar Etal
www.ijmrhs.com
Volume 4 Issue 2
Coden: IJMRHS
th
Received: 20 Jan 2015
Revised: 28th Feb 2015
Review article
Vijay Kumar Konuri1, Mohammed Abdul Hannan Hazari2, Ravi Kumar K , Chandrasekhar M ,
5
Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh,
India
2
Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, Deccan College of Medical Sciences, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad,
Telangana, India
3
Professor & HOD, Department of Physiology, Apollo Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jubilee Hills,
Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
*Corresponding author email: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
The pacemaker of the mammalian heart had developed a robust and yet a flexible system in the course of
evolution whose function is based on multiple interactions at the sub-cellular, cellular and finally at the tissue
level. These, in turn, should respond to extrinsic signals. Cardiac action potentials were explained for a long time
based on the changes that occur at the cell surface. New hypothesis was put forward at the turn of the century that
pointed to the role of intracellular calcium clock. Discovery of ryanodine receptors, fluorescence labeling
techniques, confocal imaging and finally computer modeling of physiological processes had brought about a
noticeable change that allowed development of a new concept of pacemaker automaticity. Reviewing all these
developments we hereby put forward a few theoretical formulations that can turn out to be new instruments in
advancing our knowledge of cardiac physiology. We had theorized that cardiac muscle is an emergent property of
smooth muscle in the course of evolution, and that pacemaker activity of the cardiac muscle underwent a phase
transition that finally led to the evolution of a structural pacemaker.
Keywords: Heart, Pacemaker, Automaticity, Evolution
INTRODUCTION
The sino-atrial node (SAN) pacemaker cells produce
billions of incessant and uninterrupted beats in the
course of the life time of an individual. It is evident
that the pacemaker of the mammalian heart has
developed a robust and yet a flexible system in the
course of evolution [1]. Robustness indicates the failsafe properties and flexibility signifies the
adaptability to changes in the demands made on it.
The pacemaker function is based on multiple
417
Vijaykumar et al.,
418
Vijaykumar et al.,
Fig 2: Phase transition and emergence of cardiac muscle from smooth muscle with maintenance of legacy
in some aspects
419
Vijaykumar et al.,
420
Vijaykumar et al.,
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
421
Vijaykumar et al.,