Ansoff Matrix
To portray alternative corporate growth strategies, Igor Ansoff presented a matrix that
focused on the firm's present and potential products and markets (customers). By
considering ways to grow via existing products and new products, and in existing
markets and new markets, there are four possible product-market combinations.
Ansoff's matrix is shown below:
Ansoff Matrix
Existing Products
New Products
Existing
Markets
Market Penetration
Product Development
New
Markets
Market Development
Diversification
Ansoff's matrix provides four different growth strategies:
Market Penetration - the firm seeks to achieve growth with existing products in their
current market segments, aiming to increase its market share.
Market Development - the firm seeks growth by targeting its existing products to new
market segments.
Product Development - the firms develops new products targeted to its existing market
segments.
Diversification - the firm grows by diversifying into new businesses by developing new
products for new markets.
Selecting a Product-Market Growth Strategy
The market penetration strategy is the least risky since it leverages many of
the firm's existing resources and capabilities. In a growing market, simply
maintaining market share will result in growth, and there may exist opportunities
to increase market share if competitors reach capacity limits. However, market
penetration has limits, and once the market approaches saturation another
strategy must be pursued if the firm is to continue to grow.
Market development options include the pursuit of additional market segments
or geographical regions. The development of new markets for the product may
be a good strategy if the firm's core competencies are related more to the
specific product than to its experience with a specific market segment. Because
the firm is expanding into a new market, a market development strategy
typically has more risk than a market penetration strategy.
A product development strategy may be appropriate if the firm's strengths are
related to its specific customers rather than to the specific product itself. In this
situation, it can leverage its strengths by developing a new product targeted to
its existing customers. Similar to the case of new market development, new
product development carries more risk than simply attempting to increase
market share.
Diversification is the most risky of the four growth strategies since it requires
both product and market development and may be outside the core
competencies of the firm. In fact, this quadrant of the matrix has been referred
to by some as the suicide cell". However, diversification may be a reasonable
choice if the high risk is compensated by the chance of a high rate of return.
Other advantages of diversification include the potential to gain a foothold in an
attractive industry and the reduction of overall business portfolio risk.