Diagnostic Value of C-Reactive Protein and Hematological Parameters in Neonatal Sepsis
Diagnostic Value of C-Reactive Protein and Hematological Parameters in Neonatal Sepsis
Diagnostic Value of C-Reactive Protein and Hematological Parameters in Neonatal Sepsis
e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 14, Issue 4 Ver. IV (Apr. 2015), PP 30-38
www.iosrjournals.org
Abstract: Early diagnosis and treatment of the newborn infant with suspected sepsis are essential to prevent
severe and life threatening complications. In this era of multidrug resistance, it is mandatory to avoid
unnecessary use of antibiotics to treat noninfected infants. Thus rapid diagnostic test(s) that differentiate
infected from noninfected infants, particularly in the early newborn period, have the potential to make a
significant impact on neonatal care. The purpose of the sepsis screen is to rule out sepsis rather than to rule in
sepsis. Traditionally, the sepsis screen consists of 4 items: C-reactive protein (CRP), absolute neutrophil count
(ANC), immature to total neutrophil ratio (ITR) and micro-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (-ESR).
Hence, the present study was undertaken to study above rapid diagnostic test(s) that differentiate infected from
noninfected infants, particularly in the early newborn period, have the potential to make a significant impact
on neonatal care This study on neonatal septicemia comprised of 100 neonates who were clinically suspected as
septicemia, from the pediatric NICU ward, Government General Hospital, Guntur was conducted in the
department of Microbiology, Guntur Medical College, Guntur spread over for a period of one year. Out of the
100 clinically suspected cases 40 were culture positive, C-reactive protein was positive in 36 proven cases
(90%)of neonates septicemia out of 40 blood culture positive cases. C.R.P. test was negative in all 10 control
cases. Band cell count / Neutrophil count ratio ( > 0.2) - Out of the 40 neonatal sepsis cases 28 were > 0.2
(70%) and 12 cases were <0.2 (30%) Micro ESR - It was > 10 mm in 1st hour in 32 cases (80%) in proven
neonatal septicemia. It is < 10mm in 8 cases (20%). Rapid microbe-specific diagnostic tests would assist in the
early detection of neonatal sepsis and in safely withholding antibiotics for patients in whom sepsis is unlikely.
Keywords: Neonatal sepsis, serum CRP, Band cell count, Micro ESR, Total count, Absolute neutrophil count
I.
Introduction
Neonatal sepsis or sepsis neonatorum refers to systemic infection of the newborn characterized by a
constellation of a nonspecific symptomatology in association with bacteremia. It was estimated that almost 20
per cent of all neonates develop infection during the neonatal period with the mortality rate reaching as high as
50% for infants who were not treated timely. Neonatal septicemia remains one of the most important causes of
mortality despite considerable progress in hygiene, introduction of new antimicrobial agents, and advanced
measures for early diagnosis and treatment.
The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that 1 million deaths per year are due to
neonatal sepsis many infections in the neonates can only be established on the basis of
etiological agent
recovered from blood.
Although blood culture is the gold standard for the diagnosis of sepsis, culture reports would be
available only after 48-72 hours. The purpose of the sepsis screen is to rule out sepsis rather than to rule in
sepsis. Traditionally, the sepsis screen consists of 4 items: C-reactive protein (CRP), absolute neutrophil count
(ANC), immature to total neutrophil ratio (ITR) and micro-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (-ESR).
The above Rapid diagnostic test(s) (sepsis screen test) that differentiate infected from non-infected
infants, particularly in the early newborn period, have the potential to make a significant impact on neonatal
care.
Aims and objectives: To diagnose septicemia earlier by sepsis screen tests
To evaluate Diagnostic value of C reactive protein and hematological parameters in Neonatal sepsis
II.
This study on neonatal septicemia comprised of 100 neonates who were clinically suspected as
septicemia, from the pediatric NICU ward, Government General Hospital, Guntur was conducted in the
department of Microbiology, Guntur Medical College, Guntur spread over for a period of one year
Inclusion criteria: Neonates who were clinically suspected of septicemia
DOI: 10.9790/0853-14443038
www.iosrjournals.org
30 | Page
Age < 28 days > 22 weeks of gestation and full term babies.
Presence of three (3) or more clinical symptoms like refusal of feeds, lethargy, irritability, hypothermia,
respiratory distress, jaundice, vomiting, apnoea, abdominal distension, hyperthermia, pustular skin lesions,
seizures, sclerema, cyanosis, conjunctival discharge, bulging of anterior frontanellae, diarrhea.
Exclusion criteria:
Extreme prematurity <22 weeks of gestation
Gross congenital anomalies
Undergone surgery
Specimen collection
Samples collection: One ml of collected blood sample was inoculated into blood culture bottle containing 510ml brain heart infusion broth for isolation of the bacteria. 1.8 ml for micro ESR, absolute neutrophil count and
band cells, CRP and remaining few drops used for TC and DC.
Separation of serum from blood
The 1 ml of blood preserved for serological test was kept undisturbed at room temperature for 30-45
minutes to allow clot formation. The supernatant fluid was centrifuged at low speed (1500 rpm for 5-10 mins)
and used for qualitative and quantitative tests of CRP. Serum was collected aseptically using sterile Pasteur
pipette. The present study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of positive rapid screening test like creactive protein (quantitative), total leucocyte count, ratio of band cells and neutrophil count, absolute neutrophil
count and micro ESR The remaining part was centrifuged at 1500-2000 rpm for 10-15 minutes. After
centrifugation, the deposit was used for gram stain as per the standard procedures.
The isolates from blood were identified by colony morphology, gram staining, motility and biochemical
reactions as per the standard procedures
.
1. CRP qualitative analysis
One drop of patient serum, positive control, negative control were placed in separate test circle of the
glass slide. One drop of CRP latex antigen suspension was added, mixed and spread the fluid over the entire
area of the particular cell with separate mixing sticks. The slide was tilted back and forth for two minutes. The
agglutination was noted. All the positive samples were screened for quantitative test.
2.
www.iosrjournals.org
31 | Page
www.iosrjournals.org
32 | Page
III.
Results
Table 1
Out of 100 clinically suspected cases 40 were culture positive
Total cases
100
%
Culture positive
40
40%
Culture negative
60
60%
DOI: 10.9790/0853-14443038
Cases (100)
Proved (40)
36 (TP)
4 (FN)
Probable (60)
32 (FP)
28 (PN)
www.iosrjournals.org
Control
(n=10)
0
10
group
33 | Page
Positive
40
36
Cases (100)
Proved (40)
28(TP)
12 (FN)
0
10
DOI: 10.9790/0853-14443038
Cases (100)
Proved (40)
32 (TP)
8 (FN)
www.iosrjournals.org
0
10
34 | Page
Cases (100)
Proved (40)
20 (TP)
20 (FN)
0
10
Cases (100)
Proved (40)
8(TP)
32 (FN)
0
10
DOI: 10.9790/0853-14443038
Sensitivity
90%
70%
80%
Specificity
41.7%
86.6%
60%
50%
73.3%
55.5%
20%
60%
25%
www.iosrjournals.org
35 | Page
Band neutrophils
www.iosrjournals.org
36 | Page
Micro ESR
IV.
Discussion
For the effective management of neonatal septicemia cases, study of the bacteriological profile with
their antibiotic pattern plays a significant role.
In the present study, out of the 100 clinically suspected neonates, 40 (40%) were culture positive which
correlated with Zakariya BP et al (41.6%) and Rakhee Agarwal (42.7%) (Table No. 1)
C reactive protein test was positive in 36% of culture proven cases (90%). The sensitivity was 90% and
specificity was 41.17% and positive predictive value was 52.9%. Rekha Sriram found CRP to be the single
most sensitive 90%, and specific test in distinguishing infected form non-infected group. Anita Chandana et al
had found C.R.P to be 90.9% sensitive in diagnosing infection when it was present. The sensitively to C.R.P in
the present study was closely correlating with the findings of M.Singh et al (1997).
CRP is synthesized within six to eight hours of exposure to an infective process or tissue damage, with
a half life of 19 hours, and may increase more than 1000fold during an acute phase response.16 The ranges of
sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of early onset sepsis ranges are 4390% and 7078% respectively.14
The specificity and positive predictive value of CRP ranges from 93% to 100% in late onset sepsis. Thus CRP is
a specific but late marker of neonatal infection.15 CRP as a diagnostic marker in neonates has higher
sensitivity and specificity than total neutrophil count and immature to total neutrophil ratio.17 NNPD
The differences in the results of this parameter shown by the different studies was due to variations in
the diagnostic criteria, the time of onset of infection (early or late) and different methods of CRP estimation.
(Table No. 2 and7)
In this study band cells by neutrophil count ratio (0.2) was positive in 28 cases (70%). The sensitivity
was 70% and specificity was 86.6% and the positive predictive value was 77.7%. Rekha Sriram found 52.2% of
sensitivity and 56.5% specificity and positive predictive value were 82.8%. Different studies have shown
variable results in this parameter which may be due to variations in the blood sampling time, the severity of
infection, the age of the neonates. (Table No. 3 and 7)
In the present study the Micro ESR (>10 mm) was positive in 32 cases (80%). The sensitivity was 80%
and specificity was 60% and the positive predictive value was 57.1%. Rekha Sriram found micro ESR 73.1%
sensitive and 56.2% specificity and the positive predictive value 32.8% in diagnosing infection. These
variations were due to the fact that at least four hours are required for hematological response to develop after
the onset of infection and blood samples collected and analyzed before this will yield normal results. (Table
No. 4 and 7) In the present study absolute neutrophil count (< 1800 cells/cu.mm) was positive in 20 cases
(50%). The sensitivity was 50%, specificity was 73.3% and the positive productive value was 55.5%. Rekha
Sriram, found ANC of 50% sensitivity and 49.6% specificity and the positive predictive value was 3.5% which
was very low. (Table No. 5 and 7) In the present study the total leucocyte count (<5000 cells/cu.mm) was
positive in 8 cases (20%). The sensitivity was 20%, specificity was 60% and the positive productive value was
25%. Rekha Sriram has found 63.6% sensitivity 51% specificity and the positive predictive value was 12.1%.
From this study when single test were considered CRP was the most sensitive 90% test to detect sepsis and BN
ratio is more specific 86.6%. (Table No. 6 and 7)
DOI: 10.9790/0853-14443038
www.iosrjournals.org
37 | Page
Conclusion
The number of lives lost in the perinatal and neonatal period exceeds that of any other period in life of
a similar duration. In order to sustain gains in child survival made in recent decades, attention must be focused
on reduction of morbidity and mortality in the newborn period. The evaluation of tests for neonatal sepsis is
important because the infection may present a very serious threat to the baby.
The mainstay for therapy for Neonatal Septicemia being appropriate supportive care, antibiotics used
based on susceptibility testing of organism isolated. Rapid microbe-specific diagnostic tests would assist in the
early detection of neonatal sepsis and in safely withholding antibiotics for patients in whom sepsis is unlikely.
Among the sepsis screen parameters studied CRP was the most sensitive test of 90%, BC/NC ratio was
the most specific of 86.6% and 77.7% positive predictive value. Continuing surveillance of Neonatal infections,
Local patterns and antibiotic sensitivity of pathogens is vital to determine trends in the infection improve
reliability of the data and guide empiric antibiotic therapy & preventive measures.
References
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
[7].
[8].
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].
[13].
[14].
[15].
[16].
A.K. Mane, N.V. Nagdeo, VR Thomdura - Study of neonatal septicemia in tertiary care hospital rural Nagpur, 2010. 110.
Agarwal DS, Chowdary P, Srivastava G, Saini L Study of neonatal infection. Indian Pediatr 1985: 122. 3d
Aggarwal R, Sarkar N, Deorari AK, Paul VK. Sepsis in the newborn. Indian J Pediatr. 2001; 68 (12): 1143 7. 12d
Ahmed Ghafoor T, Waqar T, Ali S, Aziz S, mahamud S. Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein and haematological parameters in
Neonatal sepsis JCPSP. 2005; 15 (3) : 152 6. 11d
Alojipan LC, Andrews BF - Neonatal sepsis, Clin. Pediatr 2005: 14:181-185. R14
Andrade SS, Bispo PJ, Gales AC (2008) - Advances in the microbiological diagnosis of sepsis. Shock 30: Suppl 14146. R67
Anita chandana M. Nagaraja rao et al Indian J.Pediatr. 1999 ; 55:947-953. 1 d
Anita Sharma, CV. Krishna murthy Evaluation of sepsis screen for diagnosis of neonatal septicemia. I11
Arnon S, Litmanovitz I. - Diagnostic tests in neonatal sepsis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. Jun 2008;21(3):223-7. R7 Bauer, Kirby, Sherris
and Truck, 1966. Am. J. Clin. Path 45 :493. M15
Bommen M. - Major common problems in neonatal infection, Journal of Applied Medicine 1997; 13:1 09-117.r49 Gerdes JS.
Diagnosis and management of bacterial infections in the neonate. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2004; 51 : 939-59. 14d.
Gotoff S P, Behrmamn R E. - Neonatal septicemia J.Pediatrics 1980 ; 76 : 142-153. R50
Gupta SK, U. Sharma, ML Gupta A rapid diagnostic method for diagnosis of neonatal septicemia. Indian Pediatr. 2003 ; 29:153155. 9d
Jaswal RS, Kaushal RK, Goel A, Pathania K. - Role of C-Reactive protein in deciding duration of antibiotic therapy in neonatal
septicemia. Indian Pediatr. 2003 Sept; 40: 880-3. 10d
Kindmark C-O. The concentration of C-reactive protein in sera from healthy individuals 1972.m10
Namedo U K et al. - Hematological Indices for early diagnosis of neonatal septicemia. Indian Pediatr 1995 ; 22: 287-291. R60.
DOI: 10.9790/0853-14443038
www.iosrjournals.org
38 | Page