Scribd
Upload
1K views

CHEM1100 Experiment 5 Laboratory Report: Introduction: State The Purpose of The Experiment and Background

The purpose of the experiment was to determine the concentration of hydrogen peroxide in sodium percarbonate laundry powder using a permanganate titration and UV-Vis spectroscopy. The average absorbance of the reactions was measured and used to calculate the concentration of hydrogen peroxide in the diluted and original bleach solutions. This allowed calculation of the moles and mass of hydrogen peroxide in the laundry powder, giving percentages of 388.71% hydrogen peroxide and 119.12% sodium percarbonate. Sources of error included imprecise measurements and dilutions affecting the calculations. Multiple trials may improve accuracy.

Uploaded by

emz_woxley
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views

CHEM1100 Experiment 5 Laboratory Report: Introduction: State The Purpose of The Experiment and Background

The purpose of the experiment was to determine the concentration of hydrogen peroxide in sodium percarbonate laundry powder using a permanganate titration and UV-Vis spectroscopy. The average absorbance of the reactions was measured and used to calculate the concentration of hydrogen peroxide in the diluted and original bleach solutions. This allowed calculation of the moles and mass of hydrogen peroxide in the laundry powder, giving percentages of 388.71% hydrogen peroxide and 119.12% sodium percarbonate. Sources of error included imprecise measurements and dilutions affecting the calculations. Multiple trials may improve accuracy.

Uploaded by

emz_woxley
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

CHEM1100 Experiment 5 Laboratory Report

CLEAN CHEMISTRY- Determination of sodium percarbonate concentration by


permanganate analysis
Name
Partner
Group

Emma Whittle
Emily Lay
P01

Student Number
Demonstrator
Date lab completed

43584794
Chris Read
13/10/14

Introduction: State the purpose of the experiment and background.


Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), a key ingredient in laundry detergents, removes stains by acting
as an oxidiser and breaking up molecules. When sodium percarbonate is added to water,
hydrogen peroxide is released. In this experiment, we will be investigating the pairing of
sodium percarbonate with potassium permanganate solution to effectively remove stains. The
purpose of the experiment was to explore the reaction between hydrogen peroxide and
permanganate. The reaction unbalanced that yields this reaction is;
H+(aq) + H2O2(aq) + MnO4- (aq) O2 (g)+ H2O(l) + Mn2+(aq)
Using a UV- vis spectroscopy, which indicates the presence of a particular species in a solution
through absorbance, the molar ratio for the reaction and the concentration of H2O2 present in
a sample of laundry powder will be determined.
Experimental Section: Include a short general description of the experiment. Remember to
use the past tense.
Safety precautions taken; Gloves, closed in shoes, lab coat, safety glasses.
Part A and B were completed and the results were recorded, needed for part C.
Firstly to neutralise the base, the solutions were prepared.
Around 0.3-0.4g of bleach powder was first measured and 1M sulfuric acid solution was added
until the fizzing had come to a stop. This solution was then added to a 100mL volumetric flask
and diluted with distilled water.
To create a second dilution, 1mL of the solution was added using an automatic pipette into a
25mL volumetric flask and filling with distilled water. Three 10mL plastic tubes were prepared
with 2.5mL of 1M H2SO4 (aq) and 2.5mL of of 4x10-4 M MKnO4 (aq).
Bleach powder solution of 1mL was added to each of the tubes with an automatic pipette and
filled to the 10mL mark with distilled water. The absorbance value on the calorimeter was rezeroed to distilled water which had been done in part B.
The absorbance values were then measured for all three tubes, as done before on the
calorimeter connected to LabQuest.
The average was taken from the three absorbance values and calculations were completed to
calculate the stoichiometry of the solution;
1. The number of moles of Hydrogen Peroxide in solution that reacted.
2. The Concentration of Hydrogen Peroxide in the two solutions.
3. The number of moles of Hydrogen Peroxide in the active oxygen laundry powder.
4. Percentage by mass of Na2CO3.1.5H2O2 in the laundry powder.
A report was written up.

Results Section: Show the steps in your calculations in each part. Use the flowchart on
page 4 as a guide. Remember to include appropriate working and units.

a.

Average absorbance
from the triplicate
analysis

b.

Number of moles of
H2O2 in solution (use
equation from line of
best fit)

c.

[H2O2] in the diluted


bleach solution

d.

[H2O2] in the 100 mL


bleach soltion before
dilution

e.

Number of moles of
H2O2 in the 100 mL
bleach solution

f.

Number of moles of
H2O2 in bleach
powder added

g.

h.

i.

j.

k.

Molar mass of H2O2

Weight of H2O2 in
bleach powder added

Percentage of H2O2 in
bleach powder

Molar mass of
Na2CO31.5H2O2

% by mass of
Na2CO31.5H2O2 in
bleach powder

Average=

0.069+ 0.072+ 0.063


3

=0.068
Best fit Equation ;
y= -2409.1x + 0.1032
When y=0.068
0.068= -2409.1x +0.1032
x= 1.461x10-5 M
C=n/V 1mL= 0.001L
C=1.461x10-5 / 0.001
=0.0146 mol/L
C1V1=C2V2
(0.0146 )(0.025) = C2(0.001)
C2= 0.365 mol/L
n=CV
n= 0.365 x 0.1
=0.0365 M
Same as the 100mL bleach solution;
=0.0365 M
MW= (2xH) + (2xO)
= (2x1.008) + (2x 15.999)
= 34.0147g/mol
M= n x MM
M= 0.0365 x 34.0147
=1.24g
Percentage= (1.24/0.319) x100
= 388.71%

MW= (2xNa)+(C)+(Ox3)+1.5((2xH)+(2xO))
MW= (22.989x2)+(12.01)+(15.999x3)+(34x1.5)
=157 g
n= (3.65 x 10-3 M)/(1.5)= 2.43x10-3
m= 2.43x10-3 x 157= 0.38
Percentage = (0.38/0.319)x100
=119.12 %

Discussion Section: You must state the overall (main) outcome of the experiment. Include
an evaluation of any sources of error and take into account how these might have affected
your final results.
The outcome of the experiment was to determine the concentration and stoichiometry of
sodium percarbonate by permanganate analysis. It has been calculated that the hydrogen
peroxide present in the bleach power was 388.71% and also the percent yield by mass of
Na2CO3.1.5H2O2 in the unknown bleach powder was 119.12%.
These percentage mass could not correct as it is over 100%, this means there is high
inaccuracy in our results. When this was compared to other groups, the inaccuracy was more
evident since the result should be a much lower percentage around 30-40%.
This is the product of the reaction of hydrogen peroxide and permaganate;
6H+(aq) + 5H2O2(aq) + 2MnO4-(aq) 5O2(g) + 6H2O(l) + 2Mn2+(aq)
There were many sources of error that could have affected the final result. An impacting
inaccuracy was the preciseness of measurements to create each solution. To improve this
error, an automatic pipette and volumetric pump was used. However, errors were introduced
during the dilution and transfer of bleach powder into the solutions. This error affected the
accuracy of our stoichiometry and as a result our calculations and percentage mass for the
experiment. This would further affect the spectrometer and wavelength if the measurements
were incorrect.
Another reason the percentage was very high could be due to the low absorbance average
from the triplicate analysis. The UV-vis spectrometer may of needed a more often calibration
with the distilled water to get a more accurate absorption value.
Multiple trials may also improve accuracy and reduce the effects of random error.
Despite this error, an accurate trendline and concentration gradient was able to be developed
for absorption and the molar ratio between hydrogen peroxide and permanganate was able to
be calculated.

References: Go to the UQ Library website. In the Search box, type Percarbonate as a


hydrogen peroxide carrier. Follow the Harvard referencing style to provide a full reference
for the article for which Javier Rivas is a co-author.
Calle, RG, Gimeno, O, Rivas, J, 2012, Percarbonate as a Hydrogen Peroxide Carrier in Soil
Remediation Processes, Environmental engineering science, vol. 29, pp. 951-956.

You might also like