Cashflow Analysis

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Q1.

Revenues generated by a new fad product are forecast as follows:


Year
1
2
3
4
Thereafter
Revenues
Rs. 40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Expenses are expected to be 40% of revenues, and working capital required in each year is expected
to be 20% of revenues in the following year. The product requires an immediate investment of
$45,000 in plant and equipment.
a. What is the initial investment in the product? Remember working capital.
b. If the plant and equipment are depreciated over 4 years to a salvage value of zero using straightline depreciation, and the firms tax rate is 40%, what are the project cash flows in each year?
c. If the opportunity cost of capital is 12%, what is the project NPV?
d. What is the projects IRR?

Q2.

Hana Industries, Inc., needs a new lathe. It can buy a new high-speed lathe for $1 million. The
lathe will cost $35,000 per year to run, but will save the firm $125,000 in labor costs, and will be
useful for 10 years. Suppose that for tax purpose, the lathe will be depreciated on a straight-line
basis over 10 year life to a salvage value of $100,000. The actual market value of the lathe at that
time also will be $100,000. The discount rate is 8% and the corporate tax rate is 35%. What is the
NPV of buying a new lathe?

Case-study
Jack Tar, CFO of Sheetbend & Halyard, Inc., opened the company confidential envelope. It contained a
draft of a competitive bid for a contract to supply duffel canvas to the U.S. Navy. The cover memo from
Sheetbends CEO asked Mr. Tar to review the bid before it was submitted.
The bid and its supporting documents had been prepared by Sheetbends sales staff. It called for
Sheetbend to supply 100,000 years of duffel canvas per year for 5 years. The proposed selling price was
fixed at $30 per yard.
Mr. Tar was not usually involved in sales, but this bid was unusual in at least two respects. First, if accepted
by the navy, it would commit Sheetbend to a fixed-price, long-term contract. Second, producing the duffel
canvas would require an investment of $1.5 million to purchase machinery and to refurbish Sheetbends
Plant in Pleasantboro, Maine.
Mr. Tar set to work and by the end of the week had collected the following facts and assumptions:
The plant in Pleasantboro had been built in the early 1900s and is now idle. The plant was fully
depreciated on Sheetbends books, except for the purchase cost of the land (in 1947) of $10,000.
Now that the land and the idle plant could be sold, immediately or in the near future, for
$600,000.
Refurbishing the plant would cost $500,000. This investment would be depreciated for tax
purposes on the 10-year MACRS schedule.
The new machinery would cost $1 million. This investment could be depreciated on the 5-year
MACRS schedule.
The refurbishing plant and new machinery would last for many years. However, the remaining
market for duffel canvas was small, and it was not clear that additional orders could be obtained
once the navy contract was finished. The machinery was custom-built and could be used only for
duffel canvas. Its secondhand value at the end of 5-years was probably zero.
Table shows the sales staffs forecasts of income from the navy contract. Mr. Tar reviewed this
forecast and decided that its assumptions were reasonable, except that the forecast used book,
not tax, depreciation.

But the forecast income statement contained no mention of working capital. Mr. Tar thought that
working capital would average about 10% of sales.

Armed with this information, Mr. Tar constructed a spreadsheet to calculate the NPV of the duffel
canvas project, assuming that Sheetbends bid would be accepted by the navy.
He had just finished debugging the spreadsheet when another confidential envelope arrived from
Sheetbends CEO. It contained a firm offer from a Maine real estate developr to purchase Sheetbends
Pleasantboro land and plant for $1.5 million in cash.
Should Mr. Tar recommend submitting the bid to the navy at the proposed price of $30 per yard? The
discount rate for this project is 12%.

Year

Yards sold

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

100,000

Price per yard

30.00

30.00

30.00

30.00

30.00

Revenues

3000000

3000000

3000000

3000000

3000000

Cost of goods sold

2100000

2184000

2271360

2362210

2456700

Operating cash flow 900000

816000

728640

637790

543300

Depreciation

250000

250000

250000

250000

250000

Income

650000

566000

478640

387790

293300

Tax @ 35%

227500

198100

167520

135720

102650

Net income

422500

367900

311120

252070

190650

Notes:
1. Yards sold and price per yard would be fixed by contract.
2. Cost of goods includes fixed cost of $300,000 per year plus variable costs of $18 per yard. Costs
are expected to increase at the inflation rate of 4% per year.
3. Depreciation: a $1 million investment in machinery is depreciated straight-line over 5 years
($200,000 per year). The $500,000 cost of refurbishing the Pleasantboro plant is depreciated
straight-line over 10-years ($50,000 per year)

You might also like