Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity of Commercial Rosemary Essential Oil (Rosmarinus Officinalis L.)
Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity of Commercial Rosemary Essential Oil (Rosmarinus Officinalis L.)
Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity of Commercial Rosemary Essential Oil (Rosmarinus Officinalis L.)
th
Original Article
!
Antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity of commercial rosemary
essential oil (Rosmarinus officinalis L.)
Zorica Stojanovi-Radi1*, Marija Nei1, Ljiljana omi2, Niko Radulovi3
1
Introduction
!
Essential oils are natural, concentrated,
volatile aromatic compounds isolated from plants.
These compounds posses a wide spectrum of
pharmacological activities. The main advantage of
natural agents is that they do not enhance the
antibiotic resistance, a phenomenon encountered
with the long term use of synthetic antibiotics.
Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) is plant
belonging to the family Labiateae. This plant is
widely used for many purposes it is well known as
a culinary spice and frequently employed in the
practice of aromatherapy (D a v i d s o n et al.,
83
McFarland
and
confirmed
using
a
spectrophotometer (UV-VIS 1650 Shimatzu, Japan).
Final density of inoculum was 5 x 105. Dilutions of
stock rosemary essential oil solutions were made
with MHB (Mueller Hinton Broth) and inoculums
were added to all wells. One inoculated well was
included to allow control of the broth suitability for
organism growth. One non-inoculated well, free of
antimicrobial agents, was also included to ensure
medium sterility. Bacterial growth was determined
by adding 20 L of 0.5 % triphenyl tetrazolium
chloride (TTC) aqueous solution (S a r t o r a t t o et
al., 2004). Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)
was defined as the lowest concentration of the oil
inhibiting visible growth (red colored pellet on the
bottom of the wells after the addition of TTC), while
minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) was
defined as the lowest oil concentration killing 99.9
% of bacterial cells. To determine MBC, the broth
was taken from each well without visible growth
and inoculated in MHA for 24 h at 37C.
Experiments were done in triplicate and the mean
values are presented.
Table 1. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBC) of
rosemary essential oil
Bacterial strain
strain type
S. aureus
S. aureus
E. coli
B. subtilis
K. pneumoniae
ATCC 25923
clinical isolate
clinical isolate
ATCC 6633
clinical isolate
MIC
(l/ml)
1.562
3.125
3.125
1.562
1.562
85
MBC
(l/ml)
1.562
6.250
>25.00
6.250
12.50
Tetracycline
(g/ml)
0.090
0.045
0.045
0.090
0.045
1.8
apsorbance at 260 nm
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
time (min)
unit
%
mg/ml
mg/ml
mg/ml
mg/ml
MI
0.424
0.172
0.257
0.235
0.218
0.191
MI in %
42.40
17.20
25.70
23.50
21.80
19.10
Conclusion
Essential oil of rosemary was previously
reported as an important antimicrobial agent with
activity at very low concentrations. Our study
confirmed the previous results regarding MIC and
MBC values of this essential oil. For the first time, it
was determined that rosemary essential oil exhibits
activity by damaging the cell membrane of gram
positive bacteria and further tests are necessary to
explore the exact mechanism of this activity. The
determined cytotoxic and antimicrobial activity of
rosemary essential oil is of great importance in
preservation of food products and also very
important information for its pharmacological
application.
The
results
showed
that
different
concentrations of essential oil have different
percentage of activity, but all of them affect root
growth, length and number. Also, it was
demonstrated that essential oil has inhibitory effect
on proliferation of cells. Higher concentrations of
essential oil exhibit stronger inhibitory effect on
mitosis (Tab. 2). Previous studies revealed that
rosemary essential oil exhibits strong cytotoxicity
against brine shrimp nauplii (K h a f a g i et al.
2000). The test which was taken is not only used for
predicting cytotoxicity, but is also used as a
86
References
Al-Meshal I.A. 1987: Mitodepressive effect of (-)cathinone, from Caltha edulis (khat), on the
meristematic region of Allium cepa (L.) root tips.
Toxicon, 25 (4): 451-454.
Asanova, Zh.K., Suleimenov, E.M., Atazhanova,
G.A., Dembitskii, A.D., Pak, R.N., Dar, A.,
Adekenov, S.M. 2003: Biological activity of 1,
8-cineole
from
levant
wormwood.
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal, 37 (1): 2830.
Carson, F.C., Mee, B.J., Riley, T.V. (2002):
Mechanism of Action of Melaleuca alternifolia
(Tea Tree) Oil on Staphylococcus aureus
determined by Time Kill, Lysis, Leakage and
Salt Tolerance Assays and Electron Microscopy.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 46 (6),
1914-1920.
Chen, C.Z. & S.L. Cooper 2002: Interactions
between dendrimer biocides and bacterial
membranes. Biomaterials 23 (16): 3359-3368.
Davidson, P.M., Porish, M.E. 1989: Methods for
testing the efficacy of food antimicrobials. Food
Technology 43 (1): 148-155.
Debersac, P., Haydel, J.M., Amiot, M.J.,
Goudonnet, H., Artur, Y., Suschetet, M., Siess,
M.H. 2001: Introduction of cytochrome P450
and/or detoxication enzymes by various extracts
of rosemary description of specific patterns.
Food and Chemical Technology, 39 (9): 907918.
El-Meleigy, M.A., Ahmed, M.E., Arafa, R.A.,
Ebrahim, N.A., El-Knolany, E.E. 2010:
Cytotoxicity of four essential oils on some
human and bacterial cells. Journal of Applied
Sciences in Environmental Sanitation, 5(2): 143159.
Faixov, Z. & . Faix 2008: Biological effects of
rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) essential
oil. Folia Veterinaria, 52(3-4): 135-139.
Fiskejso, G. 1985: The Allium test as a standard in
environmental monitoring. Hereditas, 102: 99112.
Fu, Y.J., Zu, Y.G., Chen, L.Y., Shil, X.G., Wangl,
Z., Sunl, S., Efferth, T. 2007a: Antimicrobial
Activity of Clove and Rosemary Essential Oils
Alone and in Combination. Phytotherapy
Research, 21 (10): 989994.
Fu, Y., Zu, Y., Chen, L., Efferth, T., Liangh, H.,
Liu, Z., Liu, W. 2007b: Investigation of
antibacterial activity of rosemary essential oil
against Propionibacterium acnes with atomic
force microscopy. Planta Medica, 73 (12): 127580.
87
88