2014 ICC Mediation Guidance Notes
2014 ICC Mediation Guidance Notes
2014 ICC Mediation Guidance Notes
ARBITRATION
AND ADR
MEDIATION
GUIDANCE
NOTES
FOREWORD
MEDIATION
GUIDANCE NOTES
This booklet is a practical companion to the ICC
Mediation Rules. Its purpose is to offer guidance on
issues that deserve attention when choosing and
organizing mediations. Helpful information will be found
on the many administrative and procedural questions
which a party may wish to consider when preparing
mediation proceedings on its own or in discussions with
the other party and the mediator. Mediations may be
conducted in various ways depending on the
backgrounds of the parties, their advisors and the
mediator and the nature of the dispute. In keeping with
the spirit of mediation, the Mediation Guidance Notes do
not dictate solutions, but encourage parties to work out
the best arrangements for their particular case in light of
common mediation practices and the flexibility offered
by the ICC Mediation Rules.
Although a stand-alone procedure, mediation can also
be combined with other dispute resolution procedures as
part of a tiered dispute resolution process. Increasingly,
mediation is considered as a useful and even an
indispensable first step in situations where parties are
keen on reaching a solution that upholds their mutual
business or contractual interests. It can also be used once
arbitration has commenced if parties wish to seek a
settlement. For these reasons, the Mediation Guidance
Notes also address the relationship between mediation
and arbitration.
The Mediation Guidance Notes result from work and
consultations conducted within the ICC Commission on
Arbitration and ADR, whose members are dispute
resolution practitioners and specialists from some ninety
countries worldwide. The range of legal and cultural
traditions represented within the Commission allows it to
transcend local differences and create products that
offer a basis for international understanding between
contracting parties and dispute resolution professionals.
01
FOREWORD
02
TABLE OF CONTENTS
WHAT IS MEDIATION?
04
WHY MEDIATION?
05
MEDIATION SESSIONS
06
08
Attendees 08
Procedural agreements time and language
09
Logistical arrangements
09
Information and documents
09
Mediation agreement
10
Applicable law
10
AUTHORITY
10
11
13
MISCELLANEOUS 16
Co-mediation 16
Independent expert
16
Legal representation
16
Costs
17
Recommended terms of settlement
17
Combining mediation with other
settlement procedures
17
03
WHAT IS MEDIATION?
1
For the purpose of the ICC Mediation Rules
(the Rules), mediation is a flexible settlement
technique, conducted privately and confidentially, in
which a mediator acts as a neutral facilitator to help
the parties try to arrive at a negotiated settlement of
their dispute. The parties have control over both the
decision to settle and the terms of any settlement
agreement.
2
In these Guidance Notes,1 the term mediation
refers to the entire proceedings and the term
mediation session refers to one or more sessions
during the proceedings when the mediator and the
parties meet together. 2 Further information on
mediation sessions is set out below, from paragraph
11 onwards.
3 Since mediation is flexible, the mediation procedure
to be used can be adapted to the needs of the parties,
including their cultural and legal backgrounds, and
the specifics of the dispute. The manner in which the
procedure is to be conducted will be the subject of
the discussion provided for in Article 7(1) of the
Rules. As provided for in Article 7(3) of the Rules, in
establishing and conducting the mediation, the
mediator is guided by the wishes of the parties and
treats them with fairness and impartiality.
4
During the mediation, the mediator may hold
meetings or conference calls with all of the parties
present and may also hold separate meetings or calls
with each of the parties alone.
04
5
In the course of the mediation, the parties can
exchange settlement proposals, which may lead to a
negotiated agreement. Such proposals can be made
directly between the parties or through the
mediator.
6
Since control over the decision to settle and the
terms of any settlement agreement remains with the
parties, the mediator has no power to impose a
settlement on the parties.
WHY MEDIATION?
7
Mediation takes significantly less time than
arbitration or litigation and involves much lower
costs.
8 The mediation process enables the parties to reach
agreement on solutions which could not be achieved
through an adjudicative process such as arbitration
or litigation and which would not therefore be
available through the rendering of an arbitral award
or a court decision. For example, the parties
preferred solution to a contractual dispute may be to
renegotiate the terms of the contract. The
renegotiation of a contract is possible in mediation,
whereas there is unlikely to be any legal basis for
seeking such relief in arbitration or litigation.
9
Whilst the adjudicative processes focus on the
parties legal rights, mediation helps parties also to
take into consideration commercial and other
interests. This is an important difference between
mediation and arbitration or litigation. The mediation
process can help parties acquire a better
understanding of each others needs and interests
so that they can look for a solution which
accommodates these needs and interests as far
aspossible.
05
06
14
During all meetings (both joint and private) the
mediator will seek to create an environment
conducive to constructive negotiations, but the
purpose of the meetings may vary. Some may be
used for the parties and/or their lawyers to make
presentations to each other. Others may be used for
the mediator to explore the background to the
dispute, identify the interests and needs of each of
the parties for their mutual benefit, and consider any
alternative options for settlement. Later in the
process, meetings may be used for bargaining, with
offers and counter-offers being exchanged either
directly or via the mediator. If agreement is reached,
then the meetings may be used to draft3 and agree
upon the terms of a written settlement agreement.
15 In some cases, it may be appropriate for there to be
more than one mediation session a few days or
weeks apart. It may be helpful for the parties to meet
first to discuss and make presentations to each other
regarding the dispute and to meet again, at a later
date, to negotiate a resolution of the dispute. This
allows time between the meetings, which may be
useful for different reasons. For example, it may be
used for the exchange of further information or
documents, for specific investigation to be carried
out, or for reflection or conferring with colleagues
and advisers.
16
In other cases it may be appropriate for a single
session to last two or more consecutive days. This
may be the case where there are several parties to
the dispute and more time is needed for the mediator
to meet with each of them.
17
In each case, the parties, their advisers and the
mediator should consider what type of mediation
sessions will be most useful in achieving a successful
and efficient resolution of the dispute.
07
18
If no agreement is reached at the end of the
mediation session(s), the mediator may, with the
agreement of the parties, continue to work with
them over the following days or weeks to assist them
with their continuing negotiations. This further
assistance may be provided in any way that is
convenient and practical, for example through
follow
up
telephone
discussions,
emails,
videoconferences or meetings.
PREPARATION FOR MEDIATION SESSIONS
19
Preparation for any mediation session is a
responsibility shared by the parties, their advisers
and the mediator. To this end, Article 7(1) requires
the parties and the mediator to discuss the manner
in which the mediation is to be conducted. The
mediator may further assist the parties with their
preparation through telephone discussions and/or
meetings prior to the mediation session.
20 In advance of any mediation session, the following
matters may need to be addressed:
Attendees
20.1 Have all the parties who need to be involved in
the negotiation of a resolution of the dispute
agreed to attend the session? If not, should other
parties be invited to participate?
20.2
Which individuals will attend the mediation
session on behalf of each party? In this regard,
see paragraphs 2123 below on the importance
of settlement authority.
20.3 Will the parties be represented by legal or other
advisers at the session (see also paragraph 38
below)?
08
09
Mediation agreement
20.11 Is it appropriate for the mediator and the parties
to sign a mediation agreement setting out any
agreed procedural matters not covered by the
Rules (e.g. an agreement that no binding
settlement agreement shall have been reached
between the parties unless and until the terms of
the agreement have been reduced to writing and
signed by authorized representatives of each
party)?5
Applicable law
20.12 Does the law of the place where the mediation
sessions are taking place, or any other applicable
law (e.g. the substantive law of the mediation
agreement or of the country where any
arbitration or litigation proceedings may take
place), contain any mandatory provisions
regarding the conduct of the mediation? For
example, some countries may have rules
regarding the qualifications which a mediator is
required to have.
AUTHORITY
21 One of the advantages of mediation is that it enables
parties to reach a binding agreement which resolves
their dispute. Ideally, such an agreement is executed
at the conclusion of a mediation session, thereby
providing certainty to all parties that a binding
agreement has been reached.
22 In order for a binding agreement to be executed at a
mediation session, it is generally necessary for
someone with authority to negotiate and then to
sign such an agreement to be present at the session.
5 Where the parties and the mediator wish to enter into a mediation
agreement, it is recommended that a draft of such agreement be
sent to the ICC International Centre for ADR, so that the Centre
can ensure that the provisions of the proposed agreement are
consistent with the Rules and the Centres practices in
administering the proceedings.
10
11
25
One of the advantages of mediation is that it
generally does not require numerous documents to
be exchanged or supplied to the mediator. However,
in addition to the case summaries, it is important
that each party receives copies of any documents
which another party considers to be of importance
for the mediation. Such documents are commonly
provided with the case summaries (a single lever
arch file of documents is often sufficient). After
reading those case summaries, the mediator may, in
the course of discussions held with the parties in
advance of the mediation session, help the parties
identify any additional information or documents
that it might be helpful to exchange.
26 If case summaries and documents are exchanged
sufficiently far in advance of a mediation session,
each party will have time to properly digest the
information and prepare for the session. This helps
avoid difficulties arising during the mediation
session as a result of late disclosure of information
and a partys consequent inability (or unwillingness)
to take such information into account in the
negotiations.
27 A party may wish to share information in confidence
with the mediator in advance of the mediation. This
information may, for example, relate to particular
needs or interests that the party does not wish to
disclose to the other party in advance of the
mediation session. Such information can be
provided in confidence to the mediator either orally
or in a confidential paper which is sent to the
mediator on the express understanding that the
information in the paper is not to be disclosed by the
mediator to any other party. The mediator may invite
all parties to provide such confidential papers if the
mediator considers this helpful to the process.
12
13
14
15
MISCELLANEOUS
Co-mediation
36 It may be appropriate for two or more mediators to
be appointed and to work together on the same
matter. This is often referred to as co-mediation.
Comediation may be used where there are several
parties involved in the dispute, or where the parties
wish to have the benefit of mediators from different
cultural backgrounds or with different expertise and
experience.
Independent expert
37 It may be appropriate, with the agreement of the
parties, for the mediator to be assisted by an
independent expert who can advise the mediator on
technical issues which it is important for the
mediator to understand in assisting the parties to
resolve their dispute.
Legal representation
38 In the Rules, there is no requirement or expectation
that parties will be represented by lawyers (either
inhouse or external). However, it is common,
particularly in cross-border disputes of the type that
are typically referred to mediation under the Rules,
for lawyers to assist parties in some or all parts of the
mediation process.
16
Costs
39 Article 6(6) of the Rules provides that, unless agreed
otherwise in writing by the parties, all deposits
requested and costs fixed in respect of the mediation
proceedings shall be borne by the parties in equal
shares. Article 6(7) provides that a partys other
expenditure shall remain the responsibility of that
party, unless otherwise agreed by the parties. There
may be instances where the parties agree to vary
these default provisions. For example, in advance of
the mediation, one party may agree in any event
to bear all costs of the mediation process in order
to encourage a counterparty to participate.
Alternatively, the parties may agree that, in the event
that the dispute is not settled through the mediation,
the costs of the mediation should be allocated
between the parties by the arbitral tribunal or court
in any subsequent arbitration or litigation. The costs
of the mediation may also be allocated differently
under the terms of any settlement agreement
arrived at through the mediation.
Recommended terms of settlement
40
Without imposing terms of settlement on the
parties, the mediator may, if requested by all parties,
recommend terms of settlement for their
consideration.
Combining mediation with other settlement
procedures
41
The parties and the mediator may agree that in
certain circumstances (e.g. where a settlement
agreement has not been arrived at after a certain
period of time) the parties may jointly request the
mediator to provide a non-binding evaluation of the
merits of the dispute in order to assist them in
reaching a negotiated settlement agreement.
17
18
19
20