Chapter 12 - Solution Manual
Chapter 12 - Solution Manual
Chapter 12 - Solution Manual
CHAPTER 12
Review Questions
12-1
Substantiation of the figure for inventories is an especially challenging task because of the variety
of acceptable methods of valuation. In addition, the variety of materials found in inventories calls
for considerable experience and skill to do an efficient job of identifying and test-counting goods on
hand. The possibilities of obsolescence and of excessive stocks also create problems. Finally, the
relatively large size of inventories and their significance in the determination of net income make
purposeful misstatement by the client a possibility that the auditors must guard against.
12-2
Issuance of a purchase order requires approval signatures attesting that all established procedures
have been observed for (a) determining the need for the item, (b) obtaining the competitive bids,
and (c) obtaining approval of the financial aspect of the commitment. Since the issuance of a
purchase order commits the company to a liability, the purchasing function is extremely important.
12-3
Internal control over purchasing activities is strengthened by placing exclusive authority for
purchases of all kinds in a separate purchasing department, and creating another independent
department to handle the receiving function. In addition, the recording of purchase transactions
should be assigned to an accounts payable section within the accounting department.
In a small concern, departmentalization of operations may not be feasible to this extent,
but if internal control is to be achieved, it is necessary as a minimum requirement that the functions
of purchasing, receiving, and recording be assigned to different employees not subordinate to one
another.
12-4
Adequate internal control of purchase transactions requires the preparation of serially numbered
receiving reports by an independent receiving department and the comparison of these reports with
vendors' invoices and purchase orders by the accounts payable department prior to approval of the
invoice for payment. To ascertain that these procedures are actually being followed, the auditors
will make various tests including the examination of receiving reports to see that they are complete,
current, legible, and controlled by serial numbers.
12-1
12-5
During an audit of a manufacturing company, the auditors consider the cost system for the
following purposes:
(1)
To determine that costs are properly allocated to current and future periods and hence that
cost figures used in arriving at balance sheet and income statement amounts are supported
by internal records. The appropriate allocation of costs to finished goods, work in process,
and cost of goods sold is essential to the preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles.
(2)
To obtain assurance that the cost system, as an integral part of the system of internal
control, provides proper control over costs incurred and related inventories.
(3)
12-6
The independent auditors are key participants in the planning for a client's physical inventory.
Although the auditors do not actually do the planning for the client, they offer advice on such
matters as the assignment of a key client employee to assume responsibility for the inventory;
selection of the most advantageous dates for the inventory taking; scheduling operations to
minimize goods-in-process; etc. Most important is the auditors' determination that the client's
inventory instructions are adequate.
12-7
The auditors observe the taking of the physical inventory to obtain evidence supporting its
existence. In addition, information relevant to valuation of and rights to inventory is obtained.
Observation of the physical inventory is a major step in meeting the standard of field work that
requires the auditors to gather sufficient, competent, evidential matter to provide a reasonable basis
for an opinion on the financial statements.
By observing the taking of the physical inventory, the auditors are seeking sufficient
competent evidence as to the effectiveness of the methods of inventory taking and as to the measure
of reliance which may be placed upon the client's inventory records and its representations as to
inventory quantities. The auditors must ascertain that the physical inventory actually exists, that
the inventory quantities are being determined by reasonably accurate methods, and the inventory is
in a saleable or usable condition.
12-2
12-8
The auditors make test counts of inventory quantities during their observation of the taking of the
physical inventory to ascertain that the individuals taking the inventory are making an accurate
count. The extent of test counting will be determined by the inventory-taking procedures; for
example, the number of the auditors' test counts would be reduced if there were two teams, one
verifying, the other taking the inventory. On the other hand, the auditors' test counts would be
expanded if they found errors in the inventory counts. Some test counts are recorded by the
auditors for the purpose of subsequent comparison with the client's compilation of the inventory.
The auditors must determine that the compilation of the inventory from the tags, sheets, or
computer readable forms is accurate. In addition, the auditors seek assurance that the description
and condition of the inventory items is accurate for pricing purposes and that the quantity
information, such as dozen, gross, cartons, etc., is proper.
A secondary reason for recording test counts in the audit working papers is to provide
evidence of the extent of the auditors' tests in the event that audit procedures are questioned at
some future date.
12-9
The test counts and tag numbers should be listed by the auditors in their working papers and later
traced to the client's inventory summary sheets. By this procedure, the auditors obtain evidence
that the quantities on the tags have been accurately transcribed to the summary sheets by the client
employees in developing the total valuation for inventory. If a significant number of differences are
found, the auditors may need to reexamine the original tags or request that the client recompile the
inventory.
12-10 A physical inventory at least once a year is generally essential regardless of whether perpetual
inventories are maintained. However, when perpetual inventories and good internal control are
maintained, the annual physical count may be taken at a date other than the year-end. Some
companies with good perpetual inventory records prefer to take a physical inventory in one
department at a time with the counting work thereby spread throughout the year. Furthermore, if
statistical sampling techniques are applied in the periodic counting process and the sampling is
appropriately planned and executed, the entire inventory need not be counted.
12-11 A bill and hold scheme involves transactions in which sales of merchandise are improperly billed to
customers prior to delivery, with the goods being held by the seller. These transactions overstate
revenues and net income. Bill and hold transactions have to meet rigorous requirements to be
recognized as legitimate sales.
12-12 The auditors' analysis of the Cost of Goods Sold account of a manufacturing concern might
disclose charges and credits for amounts transferred from the goods-in-process or finished goods
inventory accounts, proceeds from sales of scrap, charges for idle plant and equipment,
underabsorbed or overabsorbed factory overhead, variances from standard costs, writedowns for
inventory shortages and obsolescence, and losses on firm fixed-price contracts.
12-13 Two general conditions must exist for the auditors to render an unqualified opinion when the
physical inventory is taken on a sampling basis. First, the sampling plan must have statistical
validity. Second, the allowance for sampling risk (precision) and the sampling risk (confidence)
level must provide an estimate that allows a materially accurate valuation of the inventory.
12-3
12-14 The client should be asked to designate an employee to assume responsibility for the physical
inventory. A written plan should be developed covering such points as exact dates of the count,
possible closing of the plant, segregation of obsolete or damaged goods, design of inventory tags
and summary sheets, control of incoming and outgoing shipments during the count, drafting of
written instructions, and training of staff in the counting procedures.
12-15 The statement is misleading. Inventories are to be reported at the lower of cost or market. Also,
the expression "valued at cost" is not sufficiently specific; the method of determining cost should be
indicated.
12-16 The use of different methods of inventory valuation for different components of the company's
inventory is acceptable practice and would not prevent the issuance of an unqualified audit report.
Generally accepted accounting principles allow the use of different valuation methods for different
components of a company's inventory.
12-17 The statement is not true. The auditors' responsibilities with respect to inventories include not only
quantities and pricing but also the quality or condition of the goods, the accuracy of extensions,
footings, and summaries, and the consideration of internal control. Weakness in internal control
may cause large losses from excessive stockpiling, obsolescence, inaccurate cost data, and other
sources, even though the ending inventory is properly counted and priced.
12-18 The independent auditors utilize the client's backlog of unfilled sales orders in the determination of
net realizable value of finished goods and goods-in-process, and in the determination of losses, if
any, on firm sales commitments for which no production has yet been undertaken.
12-19 No. Inspection of the warehouse receipts does not constitute sufficient verification. The
inventories should be confirmed in writing directly to the auditors by the custodians of the stored
goods. If the inventories stored in public warehouses are substantial in relation to other assets, the
auditors should also review client records regarding selection and performance of the warehouses,
and any available reports on the warehouses' internal control. The auditors also should consider
observing substantial inventories stored in public warehouses.
12-20 In the confirmation of bank accounts and bank loans, the reply from the bank may disclose a lien
on inventory. Also in examining insurance policies on inventory, the auditors may find a "loss
payable clause" to a third party indicating inventories have been pledged. Finally, the client
officials should be asked to disclose any lien on inventory as part of the written representations
furnished to the auditors.
12-4
Organization structure is poor. The receiving department should not be under the authority
of the purchasing agent.
(2)
Copies of purchase orders sent to receiving department should not show quantities. This
encourages careless counting.
(3)
The receiving department should prepare a receiving report for each shipment received.
These documents will permit evaluation of the department's work, indicate proportion of
returns, and establish accountability for goods.
(4)
Errors by buyers are covered up by the existing system since any deficiency in goods
received is not reported by the receiving department to anyone but the buyer.
(5)
Goods should be kept in storerooms until required for production, not sent directly to the
factory production area.
(6)
There is apparently no control over the movement of raw materials into goods-in-process
and no record of the quantities of goods-in-process.
(7)
The perpetual inventory records (physical units only) for finished goods are apparently not
integrated with the accounting records.
(8)
The custody of finished goods and the recordkeeping for these goods are assigned to the
same employee.
12-5
12-22 The following audit procedures may be applied to company records and documents to discover
evidence of defalcations being committed by the buyer:
(1)
(2)
Examine a representative sample of purchase orders issued by the buyer to determine that
they have been prepared and issued in accordance with established company policy,
particularly with respect to the countersignature of purchase orders over $500. Determine
whether any orders for amounts in excess of $500 were split into two or more orders to
evade the $500 limitation.
(3)
Compare the representative sample of purchase orders with their related approved
requisitions to ascertain that the purchase orders issued were for goods and services
required by the client company and are supported by an authorized document originated
outside of the purchasing department.
(4)
(5)
Review the disbursing procedures and examine paid checks, giving particular attention to
the payee and the endorsement. This step will indicate whether the buyer has access to
checks and might reveal any fraud in their negotiation.
12-23
(a)
The auditors do not regard the inventory certificate of an outside service company
as a satisfactory substitute for their own audit of the inventory. The service company has
merely assumed the client's function of taking the physical inventory, pricing it, and
making the necessary extensions. To the extent that the service company is competent, the
internal control with regard to the inventory has been strengthened. Nevertheless, as with
any internal control system, the auditors would investigate the internal control to ascertain
that it is operating in a satisfactory manner. The auditors' investigation would necessarily
entail an observation of the taking of the inventory and testing the pricing and calculation
of the inventory.
(b)
The inventory certificate of the outside specialists would have no effect upon the audit
report. The auditors must determine that the inventory was fairly stated by observing the
taking of the inventory and testing the pricing and calculation of the inventory.
On the other hand, if the taking of the inventory was not observed and no audit tests
were applied to the computation of the inventory, the auditors would be compelled to
disclaim an opinion (or qualify their opinion) on the financial statements as a whole if the
amount of the inventory is material.
If it has been impossible for the auditors to observe the taking of the physical
inventory, but they have been able to satisfy themselves by the application of other auditing
procedures, they should not refer to the inventory in the audit report.
12-6
(c)
12-24
The auditors would make no reference to the certificate of the outside specialists in their
report. The outside specialists are serving as adjuncts of the company's permanent
employees and, as such, are in somewhat the same guise as temporary employees. The
outside specialists are not independent in that they do not have third-party interests. The
auditors, under certain circumstances, mention in their report the reports of other
independent auditors, but this practice does not extend to the certificate of outside
specialists who are not independent auditors.
(a)
When the client uses statistical sampling to estimate inventories, the auditors
should perform the following procedures:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(b)
To verify physical quantities, the auditors should perform the following procedures (only
10 required):
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
12-25
(a)
Observation of physical inventory is generally mandatory because it provides
strong evidence as to existence and quality of the client's inventories.
(b)
12-7
(c)
The auditors' review of the client's control for inventory tags is important because of the
danger that fictitious inventory tags might be created by dishonest client personnel after the
auditors have completed their observation of the physical inventory.
The oral evidence that the motors are on consignment should be substantiated by a review
of the client's records of consigned inventory, examination of contracts and correspondence
with consignors, and confirmation of consigned stocks by direct communication with
consignors.
(b)
The location of the machine in the receiving department, together with the presence of the
"REWORK'' tag, suggests that the machine had been shipped to a customer but rejected
and returned. The auditors should examine the receiving report for the machine, the
accounts receivable confirmation from the customer, and records of the client's quality
control department, to ascertain who has title to the machine. If the customer has title, the
machine should not be included in inventory, and a liability for rework costs should be
established. If the client has title, the customer's account should be credited for the sales
return and the machine should be included in the client's inventory at estimated realizable
value.
(c)
The "Material Inspection and Receiving Report" signed by the Navy Source Inspector is
evidence that title to the machine passed to the U.S. Naval Base on November 30.
Accordingly, the auditors should ascertain that the sales value of the machine is included in
accounts receivable, and that the cost of the machine is not in the inventory.
(d)
The location of the storeroom and the dusty condition of the goods suggest that the items
may be obsolete, or at least slow moving. The auditors should inspect perpetual inventory
records for usage of the materials, and should inquire of production personnel whether the
materials are currently useful in production. The materials may have to be valued at scrap
value.
12-27 Auditing procedures that the auditors would employ to determine whether slow-moving or obsolete
items are included in the inventory are the following:
(1)
During the observation of physical inventory, make note of any dusty or rusted items, or
other items in obviously poor condition. In addition, investigate any inventory stored in
out-of-the-way locations.
(2)
If the client maintains reliable perpetual inventory records, review them for raw materials
that have not been requisitioned and for finished goods that have not been shipped for
extended periods.
12-8
(3)
Compare the raw materials physical inventory listings with bills of material for products
currently in production or on order.
(4)
Compare the backlog of unfilled sales orders at the audit date to the finished goods
inventory list.
(5)
Review catalogs and other sales department publications for finished goods currently being
advertised and offered for sale.
(6)
Be alert for any incomplete jobs that are dormant in the review of goods-in-process
inventory records.
(7)
Examine post-audit date sales orders and materials requisitions to determine what finished
goods and raw materials were active in the subsequent period.
(8)
Inquire of the client management as to any recent survey for obsolete or slow-moving
inventory.
(9)
Compare the beginning and ending inventory listings are compared for items showing little
if any quantity changes.
(10)
Compute the turnover of inventory by product line and compare it to that of prior
periods for an indication of an adverse trend.
(11)
Perform other analytical procedures, such as comparing the trend of gross profit by
product line.
12-28 Since Reed Company obtained its entire merchandise inventory from the president of the company
in a related party transaction, the auditors should consider the cost of the merchandise to the
president in his operation of a similar business as a sole proprietor. In this related party
transaction, the auditors must look beyond forma total cost of $100,000 for the original stock of
merchandiseto substance. Substantively, the merchandise of Reed Company should not be
valued at excessive amounts, that is, amounts beyond what it could be acquired for directly from
vendors. Any excess amount charged by the president to Reed Company represents unamortized
discount on the notes payable. The entire transaction should be fully disclosed in a note to the
financial statements of Reed Company.
12-9
12-29
(a)
To establish proper inventory cutoff, the auditors use the shipping and receiving
information obtained at the physical inventory and:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Examine sales transactions and supporting documentation for a period before the
physical inventory and determine that goods shipped before the physical inventory
have been included in sales and cost of sales, and that goods included in inventory
are not included in sales and cost of sales.
Select receiving reports for goods received before the physical inventory and
determine that all goods received before the inventory have been included in
inventory and liabilities.
Review supporting documentation for goods not included in the physical count but
included in the general ledger inventory control account (e.g., inventory in transit)
and determine that the goods are properly included in inventory.
Examine purchase and sales transactions and detailed supporting documents for
the period after the physical inventory to determine that they have been reflected in
the proper period.
Review records of returned goods and claims against suppliers and related
memoranda for periods before and after the cutoff date to determine that returns
and claims against suppliers made after the cutoff date have been entered in the
appropriate period.
(b) When the auditors arrive for the observation, they will inspect the premises to determine
whether:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
12-10
12-30 The audit procedures to be applied to determine that standard costs and related variance accounts
applicable to materials are acceptable and have not distorted the financial statements would include
the following:
(1)
Consider the internal control, determine appropriate tests of controls, and assess control
risk.
(2)
(3)
Determine that the data on the standard cost records are reasonably current. Out-of-date
standards may result in abnormal variances.
(4)
Ascertain the accuracy of the specifications on the standard cost records by comparison
with engineering specifications or other independent sources. Determine that the procedure
for establishing standard material cost gives consideration to spoilage, scrap loss, and byproducts of the process.
(5)
Determine that, in establishing standard material prices, consideration was given to the
following factors: normal quality, normal quantity, normal sources, and delivery by
normal carrier. The treatment in the accounts of discounts, whether excluded or included
in the standard costs, should be investigated for consistency.
(6)
The accounting system for recording standard costs should be reviewed for reasonableness,
and tests should be applied to determine that the system is functioning effectively. Source
documents (vendors' invoices, requisitions, production reports, and other internally
generated accounting evidence) should be examined and related to the transactions flowing
through the cost system. In this connection, reference should be made to the standard cost
records to determine that standard cost data flowing through the accounting system are
being accurately compiled.
(7)
Review the material price variance and material usage variance accounts for overall
reasonableness. The variance accounts should also be reviewed for excessive variations in
the month-to-month charges, and satisfactory explanations should be obtained where
necessary.
(8)
The impact of the variances on the financial statements should be considered. If the
variances are of amounts so substantial that placing them in the income statement would
distort current operating results and inventory valuation, then consideration should be
given to allocating them on a pro rata basis to cost of goods sold and inventories.
12-11
Objective Questions
12-31
(3)
The shipping department, not the receiving department, is responsible for
preparation of a shipping document.
(c)
(1)
A bill of lading acknowledges the receipt of goods and sets forth
provisions of the transportation agreement.
(d)
(1)
Direct labor, raw materials, and factor overhead are all included in
inventory costs of a manufacturing company.
(e)
(1)
The Cost Accounting Standards Board was established by Congress to
narrow the options in cost accounting that are available under generally accepted
accounting principles.
(f)
(1)
Of the choices, existence is most directly related to overstated inventory
because inclusion of inventory items that do not exist in inventory totals results in
an overstated inventory.
(g)
(1)
The professional standards allow auditors to use physical counts
prior to year-end when a client has well-kept perpetual (computerized or noncomputerized) inventory records.
(h)
(1)
Analytical procedures will be facilitated when a client uses a standard cost
system that produces variance reports. Such reports will allow the auditors to
identify significant deviations from expected values.
(i)
(1)
Since the internal control is described as being weak, the CPAs will
generally insist upon a physical count at year-end.
(j)
(2)
The best procedure for the discovery of damaged goods is an examination
of the condition of the inventory during the auditors' observation of the physical
inventory.
(k)
(1)
Mullins may issue an unqualified opinion as long as she is satisfied that
the client's procedures are adequate to provide a reliable inventory balance.
(l)
(2)
The primary objective of the CPAs' observation of inventories is to
provide sufficient competent evidence as to the existence of the inventory and the
controls over the inventory-taking process.
12-12
12-32
Simulation
(a)
(3)
Answer (3) is correct because a larger percentage of sales in the
last month is likely to result in a lower ending inventory, thus increasing the
inventory turnover ratio since the denominator of the fraction becomes smaller.
(b)
(5)
Answer (5) is correct because the only reason net income increased was the
decreases in the provision for income taxes.
(c)
(6)
Answer (6) is correct because inability to pass on costs will decrease the profit
percentage.
(d)
12-33 Simulation
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
Yes. Strong internal control may create a situation in which the count may be taken prior
to year end and updated as necessary.
No. Ordinarily, locations may be sampled.
No. Although enough counts must be recorded to allow a reviewer to in essence determine
whether a proper count has been taken, not every count need be recorded.
No. Both existence and completeness are addressed.
Yes. Raw materials are also included.
No. Inventory should be valued at the lower of cost or market, not standard cost.
Yes. Inventory consigned in is owned by the company that supplied the goods.
No. Williams Inc. must perform the count.
No. The auditor may sample items.
No. The client should not know every test count taken, thus reducing the possibility of
manipulation of items not counted.
12-13
Problems
12-35 SOLUTION: Inventory Misstatements (Estimated time: 20 minutes)
Misstatement
a.
Error or
Fraud
Error
b.
Fraud
c.
Fraud
Controls
Development of adequate
inventory taking procedures
and adequate supervision of
physical inventory.
Use of prenumbered receiving
reports and controls to insure
adequate cut-off of purchases
and payables.
Effective audit committee and
internal audit department to
monitor managements
override of internal controls.
Substantive Procedure
Observation of inventory.
(b)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
12-14
(c)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
1237
SOLUTION:Alden,Inc.(Estimatedtime:30minutes)
Recommended Improvements
Weaknesses
(1)
(2)
12-15
(3)
(4)
(5)
Weaknesses
There is no receiving department or
receiving report. For proper separation of
duties, the individuals responsible for
receiving should be separate from the
storeroom clerks.
Recommended Improvements
A receiving department should be established.
Personnel in this department should count or
weigh all goods received and prepare a
prenumbered receiving report. These reports
should be signed, dated, and controlled. A copy
should be sent to the accounting department,
purchasing department, and storeroom.
(6)
(7)
12-16
b.
c.
d.
Audit Procedures
1. Observation of inventory at selected locations without
prenotification of the locations selected.
2. Analytical procedures comparing ratios (e.g., gross
margins) at locations observed to locations not
observed.
1. Tests of the accumulation of manufacturing costs and
assignment of costs to selected inventory items.
2. Analytical procedures involving the comparison of
recorded costs of inventory items to costs assigned in
prior periods.
1. Review of inventory turnover of selected inventory
items.
2. Inquiry of sales personnel about sales of particular
inventory items.
1. Review of trends in sales returns.
2. Inquiry of production and quality control personnel.
12-39 SOLUTION: Internal Control, Tests of Controls, and Substantive Procedures (Estimated time: 25
minutes)
(a)
(2)
(3)
(b)
(2)
(3)
(1)
Written inventory-taking instructions help insure that everyone involved in
the physical inventory understands the procedure. The instructions make it more
likely that an accurate and complete record of amount and quality of inventory on
hand will be obtained.
Identification of damaged goods is required for fair presentation of the inventory
account, since such items should be valued at net realizable value.
Perpetual inventory records provide essential information to make decisions
regarding purchasing, sales, and production planning. The records serve to
discourage waste and theft, since storekeepers are held responsible for shortages
revealed by physical counts. They also reduce the probability of errors or fraud in
the Inventory and Cost of Goods Sold accounts.
(1)
The existence of written inventory-taking procedures is verified by
examination of the instructions. The auditors also make suggestions for
improvements when they discover deficiencies in the instructions.
Inquiry of client personnel or review of the client's inventory policies could be used
to test the existence of a requirement for the identification of damaged
merchandise. The auditors should be alert for damaged merchandise during their
inventory observation to test the effectiveness with which client personnel are
complying with the policy.
The existence of perpetual records is tested by inspection of the records and
inquiry regarding the client's procedures.
12-17
(c)
(2)
(3)
(1)
When written instructions are not prepared for the client's physical
inventory, the auditors might decide to increase the intensity of their observation
procedures. More auditors might be assigned to the inventory observation, and the
extent of the test counts of inventory items could be increased. The auditors
should be more alert for problems, such as failure to adequately control inventory
tags or double counting of inventory items.
If the client does not require the identification of damaged goods, the auditors
should be especially alert for damaged goods during their observation of the
physical inventory. They might also make more extensive inquiries of storekeeping
personnel regarding the condition of inventory items.
The lack of a perpetual inventory system would generally require that the auditors
observe the client's physical inventory at, or near, the balance sheet date. The
auditors' inventory observation procedures might also be intensified.
(1)
The auditors must control all inventories until they have been counted to
be certain that gems are not transferred from one store to another store and
included in inventory more than once. Gems are easily transportable and are not
readily distinguishable from other gems by the layman. Thus, unless the auditors
controlled all of the inventories during the counting of the inventory, they would be
uncertain whether the gems and jewelry had been transferred from store to store
without their knowledge.
(2)
(b)
The nature of the inventory is such that auditors are not competent without special
training to identify or value the merchandise in the inventory. Although they can
count the gems on hand, they cannot be certain whether they are counting valuable
gems or nearly worthless imitations. It is therefore necessary that the auditors
request the client to engage the services of a specialist who is competent to identify
and appraise the value of the gems.
In some manner, the auditors should exercise control over the in-transit inventory so that
they may be certain it is counted but not duplicated in the inventory. If possible, a staff
member of the CPA firm should be on hand at the retail store when the diamonds in transit
are delivered. The gems should be examined by a diamond specialist as to quality and
value, and the specialist's findings should be compared with the records of the shipment at
the wholesale store. It should be determined that the diamonds were included in the
inventory of only one store and that all inventory profit was eliminated from the inventory.
12-18
The size of the ranch and the movements of the large number of cattle during their grazing
make observation of a complete physical inventory very difficult. The auditors might
consider requesting the client to rent a helicopter for the auditors to use in taking low-level
photographs of the various clusters in each photograph, and to obtain an accurate estimate
of the number of head of cattle in inventory. Lacking the aerial photography, the auditors
would have to request the client to round up the cattle and run them through a chute for
counting.
(2)
The gondola freight cars would contain pig iron bars in several layers. Therefore, to make
certain that the lower layers of the gondola cars did contain pig iron rather than lumber, for
example, the auditors would have to request the client to move enough of the pig iron from
the car to permit observation of portions of each layer of pig iron. A representative sample
of the pig iron bars would have to be weighed or measured, depending upon the unit of
count, so that the total load of the gondola car could be estimated. If the weight is the unit
of measure of the pig iron, the loaded gondola car might be weighed and the weight of the
empty car, furnished by the railroad, subtracted to obtain an estimate of the weight of the
entire carload of pig iron.
(3)
The cutoff of production, purchases, and sales is the principal problem when a client
operates around the clock. Presumably, the client will employ a professional inventory
service to take the physical inventory, since production is continuing. The client and the
auditors would have to agree upon a set hour for the cutoff, instead of just the balance
sheet date.
12-19
Consignments out
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(b)
Obtain from the client a complete list of all consignees together with copies of the
consignment contracts.
Evaluate the consignment contract provisions relative to the following areas:
(a)
Payment of freight and other handling charges.
(b)
Extension of credit.
(c)
Rates and computation of commissions to consignees.
(d)
Frequency and contents of reports and remittances received from
consignees.
Discuss with the client any variations found in the contracts that do not seem
justified by the circumstances.
Following review of the consignment contracts, communicate directly with the
consignees to obtain complete information in writing on merchandise remaining
unsold, receivables resulting from sales, unremitted proceeds, and accrued
expenses and commissions, which should be reconciled with the client's records for
the period covered by the engagement.
Determine that merchandise on consignment with consignees is valued on the same
basis as merchandise on hand, and included as part of the inventory. Ascertain
that any arbitrary mark-ups are deducted and that shipping and related charges for
the transfer of merchandise to the consignees are reflected as part of the inventory.
Ascertain that quantities of goods in hands of consignees at the close of the period
under audit appear in the balance sheet and are separately designated as
"Merchandise on Consignment."
Determine that goods pledged to obtain funds are covered by warehouse receipts.
(The examination of warehouse receipts alone is not a sufficient verification of
goods stored in public warehouses.)
Request direct confirmation from the warehouses in which the merchandise is held.
If available, obtain independent accountants' reports on the warehouses' internal
controls over the custody of stored goods.
Review the client's procedures for acceptance and evaluation of the performance
of warehouses, and review supporting documents.
Review the loan agreements collateralized by warehouse receipts. These
agreements usually provide for certain payments to be made by the borrower as
pledged goods are sold.
Consider observing a physical inventory of goods stored at the public warehouses.
12-20
Item
Financial
statement
assertion
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
12-21
Audit
procedure
I
Ethics Case
12-45 (a)
(b)
If an employee or partner accepts more than a token gift from a client the appearance of
independence may be lacking. Accordingly, a judgment must be made as to whether this
discount is considered more than token. From the clients perspective it almost certainly
is token, but from the perspective of the individual CPA the problem is more complex.
Although we are not aware of research addressing the issue, our experience is that such
discounts have historically been commonly accepted. While we question accepting such
discounts, we do not believe that they necessarily would impair the independence.
First, relating to the discount, if one believes that it affects either actual independence or
the appearance of independence, a very major difficulty is encountered. Indeed, if one is
concerned about this matter, and if members of the audit team received such a discount in
the past, the audit may be viewed as having been performed by non-independent
accountants. Yet, as indicated above, we question whether such a discount would impair
independence.
A more subtle issue is that related to inventory. Tests of controls have revealed a
system that seems strong, yet the controller simply withdrew shirts from inventory
apparently with no documentation of the transaction. The information is limited, but it
causes one to question whether recorded quantities of inventory do in fact exist and the
control over them. Several possible courses of action exist here:
(1)
Ignore the issue. The auditor might assume this is an infrequent occurrence that
could not lead to a material misstatement. Yet, if shirts can be taken from
inventory this simply a material misstatement may indeed be possible. The
approach of ignoring the problem would seem risky at best.
(2)
Talk to the controller about the issue. This would have to be done professionally
and diplomatically. The auditor would need to attempt to determine whether this
possible weakness might lead to a material misstatement.
(3)
Bring the matter to the attention of the in-charge senior and seek guidance. In a
situation such as this, asking for advice from the in-charge senior seems a good
choice.
12-22
Since the decline in market value of the commodities occurred subsequent to the client's
year-end, the auditors appear not to be justified in issuing a qualified opinion.
The alternatives available to the auditors are to: (1) issue an unqualified opinion if
the decline in value of the inventory is adequately disclosed in a note to the financial
statements, or (2) issue an unqualified opinion regardless of whether the decline in value is
adequately disclosed.
(b)
We believe that the auditors should issue an unqualified opinion only if the client agrees to
disclose the decline in value in a note to the financial statements. As stated in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 5 (Current Text section C59.112):
After the date of an enterprise's financial statements but before those financial
statements are issued, information may become available indicating that an
asset was impaired...after the date of the financial statements...Disclosure of
those kinds of losses...may be necessary...to keep the financial statements
from being misleading.
12-23