3GPP TS 23.107

3rd Generation Partnership Project;
Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects;

V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Quality of Service (QoS) concept and architecture
Technical Specification
(Release
12)
3GPP TS 23.107
The present document has been developed within the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP TM) and may be further elaborated for the purposes of 3GPP.
The present document has not been subject to any approval process by the 3GPP Organisational Partners and shall not be implemented.
This Specification is provided for future development work within 3GPP only. The Organisational Partners accept no liability for any use of this
Specification.
Specifications and reports for implementation of the 3GPP TM system should be obtained via the 3GPP Organisational Partners' Publications Offices.
Release 12
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Keywords
LTE, GSM, UMTS, architecture, performance
3GPP
Postal address
3GPP support office address
650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis
Valbonne - FRANCE
Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16
Internet
http://www.3gpp.org
Copyright Notification
No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.
The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
2014, 3GPP Organizational Partners (ARIB, ATIS, CCSA, ETSI, TTA, TTC).
All rights reserved.
UMTS is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its members
3GPP is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
LTE is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
GSM and the GSM logo are registered and owned by the GSM Association
3GPP
Release 12
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Contents
Foreword..........................................................................................................................................................
1
Scope......................................................................................................................................................
References..............................................................................................................................................
Abbreviations.........................................................................................................................................
High Level Requirements.......................................................................................................................
4.1
4.2
4.3
End User QoS Requirements...............................................................................................................................

General Requirements for QoS............................................................................................................................
Technical Requirements for QoS.........................................................................................................................
CS QoS in release 1999..........................................................................................................................
QoS Architecture....................................................................................................................................
6.1
6.1.1
6.1.2
6.1.3
6.1.4
6.2
6.2.1
6.2.1.1
6.2.1.2
6.2.2
6.2.2.1
6.2.2.2
6.3
6.3.1
6.3.2
6.3.3
6.3.4
6.4
6.4.1
6.4.2
6.4.3
6.4.3.1
6.4.3.2
6.4.3.3
6.4.4
6.4.4.1
6.4.4.2
6.4.4.3
6.4.5
6.4.6
6.4.7
6.5
6.5.1
6.5.2
6.6
Overview of Different Levels of QoS.................................................................................................................

The End-to-End Service and UMTS Bearer Service...................................................................................
The Radio Access Bearer Service and the Core Network Bearer Service...................................................
The Radio Bearer Service and the RAN Access Bearer Service.................................................................
The Backbone Network Service...................................................................................................................
QoS Management Functions in the Network.....................................................................................................
Description of functions...............................................................................................................................
QoS management functions for UMTS bearer service in the control plane................................................
Functions for UMTS bearer service in the user plane.................................................................................
Allocation of QoS management functions...................................................................................................
QoS management functions for UMTS bearer service in the control plane................................................
QoS management functions for the UMTS bearer service in the user plane...............................................
UMTS QoS Classes...........................................................................................................................................
Conversational class.....................................................................................................................................
Streaming class............................................................................................................................................
Interactive class............................................................................................................................................
Background class.........................................................................................................................................
QoS Attributes...................................................................................................................................................
Asymmetric Bearers.....................................................................................................................................
Sources of UMTS Bearer Service Attributes...............................................................................................
UMTS Bearer Service Attributes.................................................................................................................
List of attributes...........................................................................................................................................
Attributes discussed per traffic class............................................................................................................
UMTS bearer attributes: summary...............................................................................................................
Radio Access Bearer Service Attributes.......................................................................................................
List of attributes...........................................................................................................................................
Attributes discussed per traffic class............................................................................................................
Radio Access Bearer attributes: summary...................................................................................................
Radio Bearer Service Attributes...................................................................................................................
RAN Access Bearer Service Attributes........................................................................................................
Core Network Bearer Service Attributes.....................................................................................................
Attribute Value Ranges......................................................................................................................................
Ranges of UMTS Bearer Service Attributes................................................................................................
Ranges of Radio Access Bearer Service Attributes for UTRAN and for GERAN......................................
Bearer unrelated QoS Attributes........................................................................................................................
Void......................................................................................................................................................
QoS Attribute Mapping........................................................................................................................
8.1
8.2
8.3
From Application Attributes to UMTS Bearer Service Attributes.....................................................................

From UMTS Bearer Service Attributes to Radio Access Bearer Service Attributes.........................................
From UMTS Bearer Service Attributes to CN Bearer Service Attributes.........................................................
3GPP
Release 12
9
9.1
9.1.1
9.1.1.1
9.1.1.2
9.1.2
9.1.2.1
9.1.2.2
9.1.2.3
9.2
9.3
9.4
A.1.1
A.2
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Interworking.........................................................................................................................................
UMTS-GSM CS/GPRS.....................................................................................................................................
UMTS-GSM CS...........................................................................................................................................
Handover from UMTS to GSM...................................................................................................................
Handover from GSM to UMTS...................................................................................................................
UMTS-GPRS...............................................................................................................................................
General rules................................................................................................................................................
Determining R99 attributes from R97/98 attributes....................................................................................
Determining R97/98 attributes from R99 attributes....................................................................................
UMTS-PSTN.....................................................................................................................................................
UMTS-ISDN.....................................................................................................................................................
UMTS-Internet..................................................................................................................................................
Annex A (informative):
A.1
Error resilience in real-time packet multimedia payloads.........................
Introduction..........................................................................................................................................
Factors affecting error resilience.......................................................................................................................
Example figures....................................................................................................................................
Annex B (normative):
Reference Algorithm for Conformance Definition of Bitrate....................
Annex C (normative):
Determine which QoS profile is of highest QoS..........................................
Annex D (normative):
Determine Traffic Class weights in HLR QoS profile................................
Annex E (informative):
Change history..............................................................................................
3GPP
Release 12
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Foreword
This Technical Specification (TS) has been produced by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).
The present document identifies the Quality of Service (QoS) aspects for the 3GPP system.
The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within the TSG and may change following formal
TSG approval. Should the TSG modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by the TSG with an
identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows:
Version x.y.z
where:
x the first digit:
1 presented to TSG for information;
2 presented to TSG for approval;
3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control.
y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections,
updates, etc.
z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document.
3GPP
Release 12
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Scope
The present document provides the framework for Quality of Service within the 3GPP system. The main purpose is to
specify the list of attributes applicable to the UMTS Bearer Service and the Radio Access Bearer Service, as well as
describe the Quality of Service architecture to be used in the 3GPP system.
References
The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present
document.
References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or
non-specific.
For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.
For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including
a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document in the same
Release as the present document.
[1]
3GPP TS 23.110: "UMTS Access Stratum - Services and Functions".
[2]
3GPP TS 22.100: "UMTS Phase 1".
[3]
3GPP TS 23.121: "Architectural Requirements for Release 1999".
[4]
Void.
[5]
3GPP TS 22.105: "Services & Service capabilities".
[6]
3GPP TS 24.008: "Mobile radio interface layer 3 specification; Core Network Protocols
Stage 3".
[7]
3GPP TS 23.207: "End-to-end QoS concept and architecture".
[8]
3GPP TS 23.008: "Organization of subscriber data".
[9]
3GPP TS 23.067: "enhanced Multi-Level Precedence and Pre-emption service (eMLPP) Stage 2".
[10]
3GPP TS 03.60 (Release 1998): "Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); General
Packet Radio Service (GPRS); Service description; Stage 2 (Release 1998)".
[11]
3GPP TS 23.216: "Single Radio Voice Call Continuity (SRVCC); Stage 2".
Abbreviations
For the purpose of the present document, the following abbreviations apply:
3G
AMR
ATM
BER
BS
CC
CN
CRC
CS
DTX
3rd Generation
Adaptive Multirate speech codec
Asynchronous Transfer Mode
Bit Error Rate
Bearer Service
Call Control
Core Network
Cyclic Redundancy Check
Circuit Switched
Discontinuous Transmission
3GPP
Release 12
FDD
FER
FTP
GERAN
GPRS
GSM
IETF
IP
ISDN
MO
MPEG
MT
MTC
NS
PDP
PDU
PS
PSTN
QoS
RA
RAB
RAN
RLC
RSVP
RT
RTP
SAP
SDU
SGSN
SLA
SMS
SVC
UDP
TBC
TDD
TE
TSPEC
UE
UMTS
UTRA
UTRAN
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Frequency Division Duplex

Frame Erasure Ratio
File Transfer Protocol
GSM/EDGE Radio Access Network
General Packet Radio Service
Global System for Mobile Communication
Internet Engineering Task Force
Internet Protocol
Integrated Services Digital Network
Mobile Originating Call
Moving Pictures Expert Group
Mobile Terminal
Mobile Terminated Call
Network Service
Packet Data Protocol
Protocol Data Unit
Packet Switched
Public Switched Telephone Network
Quality of Service
Routing Area
Radio Access Bearer
Radio Access Network
Radio Link Control
Resource Reservation Protocol
Real Time
Real Time Transport Protocol
Service Access Point
Service Data Unit
Serving GPRS Support Node
Service Level Agreement
Short Message Service
Switched Virtual Circuit
User Datagram Protocol
Token Bucket Counter
Time Division Duplex
Terminal Equipment
Traffic Specification
User Equipment
Universal Mobile Telecommunication System
UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access
UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access Network
High Level Requirements
4.1 End User QoS Requirements

Generally, end users care only the issues that are visible to them. The involvement of the user leads to the following
conclusions. From the end-user point of view:
-
only the QoS perceived by end-user matter;
the number of user defined/controlled attributes has to be as small as possible;
derivation/definition of QoS attributes from the application requirements has to be simple;
QoS attributes shall be able to support all applications that are used, a certain number of applications have the
characteristic of asymmetric nature between two directions, uplink/downlink;
QoS definitions have to be future proof;
3GPP
Release 12
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
QoS has to be provided end-to-end.
4.2 General Requirements for QoS

-
QoS attributes (or mapping of them) should not be restricted to one or few external QoS control mechanisms but
the QoS concept should be capable of providing different levels of QoS by using UMTS specific control
mechanisms (not related to QoS mechanisms in the external networks).
All attributes have to have unambiguous meaning.
QoS mechanism have to allow efficient use of radio capacity.
Allow independent evolution of Core and Access networks.
Allow evolution of UMTS network, (i.e., eliminate or minimise the impact of evolution of transport technologies
in the wireline world).
All attribute combinations have to have unambiguous meaning.
4.3 Technical Requirements for QoS

This clause presents the general high-level technical requirements for the UMTS QoS. QoS will be defined with a set of
attributes. These attributes should meet the following criteria:
-
UMTS QoS control mechanisms shall provide QoS attribute control on a peer to peer basis between UE and 3G
gateway node;
the UMTS QoS mechanisms shall provide a mapping between application requirements and UMTS services;
the UMTS QoS control mechanisms shall be able to efficiently interwork with current QoS schemes. Further, the
QoS concept should be capable of providing different levels of QoS by using UMTS specific control
mechanisms (not related to QoS mechanisms in the external networks);
a session based approach needs to be adopted for all packet mode communication within the 3G serving node
with which UMTS QoS approach shall be intimately linked, essential features are multiple QoS streams per
address;
the UMTS shall provide a finite set of QoS definitions;
the overhead and additional complexity caused by the QoS scheme should be kept reasonably low, as well as the
amount of state information transmitted and stored in the network;
QoS shall support efficient resource utilisation;
the QoS attributes are needed to support asymmetric bearers;
applications (or special software in UE or 3G gateway node) should be able to indicate QoS values for their data
transmissions;
QoS behaviour should be dynamic , i.e., it shall be possible to modify QoS attributes during an active session;
number of attributes should be kept reasonably low (increasing number of attributes, increase system
complexity);
user QoS requirements shall be satisfied by the system, including when change of SGSN within the Core
Network occurs.
3GPP
Release 12
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
CS QoS in release 1999
For UMTS release '99 CS-CC, the QoS related bearer definitions of GSM (as defined in bearer capability information
element, octet 6 and its extensions) are sufficient.
Based on the Bearer Capability information element the following services can be identified:
a) speech: from the Information Transfer Capability (ITC) parameter;
b) data, non-transparent: from the ITC and Connection element (CE) parameters;
c) data, transparent: from the ITC and CE parameters.
For each of the above services, associated call control parameters, including the Bearer Capability information element,
can be considered to define the UMTS bearer service.
The further mapping to Radio Access Bearer attributes is done according to the principles described in clause 8.
NOTE:
The mapping from GSM CC to UMTS RAB attributes is in the responsibility of CN WG1 and CN WG3.
QoS Architecture
6.1 Overview of Different Levels of QoS

Network Services are considered end-to-end, this means from a Terminal Equipment (TE) to another TE. An End-toEnd Service may have a certain Quality of Service (QoS) which is provided for the user of a network service. It is the
user that decides whether he is satisfied with the provided QoS or not.
To realise a certain network QoS a Bearer Service with clearly defined characteristics and functionality is to be set up
from the source to the destination of a service.
A bearer service includes all aspects to enable the provision of a contracted QoS. These aspects are among others the
control signalling, user plane transport and QoS management functionality. A UMTS bearer service layered architecture
is depicted in figure 1, each bearer service on a specific layer offers it's individual services using services provided by
the layers below.
3GPP
Release 12
10
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
UMTS
TE
MT
RAN
CN
Gateway
CN
EDGE
NODE
TE
End-to-End Service
TE/MT Local
Bearer Service
External Bearer
Service
UMTS Bearer Service
Radio Access Bearer Service
Radio Bearer
Service
RAN Access
Bearer Service
Physical Radio
Bearer Service
Physical
Bearer Service
CN Bearer
Service
Backbone
Bearer Service
Figure 1: UMTS QoS Architecture
6.1.1 The End-to-End Service and UMTS Bearer Service

On its way from the TE to another TE the traffic has to pass different bearer services of the network(s). A TE is
connected to the UMTS network by use of a Mobile Termination (MT). The End-to-End Service on the application
level uses the bearer services of the underlying network(s). As the End-to-End Service is conveyed over several
networks (not only UMTS) it is not subject for further elaboration in the present document.
The End-to-End-Service used by the TE will be realised using a TE/MT Local Bearer Service, a UMTS Bearer
Service, and an External Bearer Service.
TE/MT Local Bearer Service is not further elaborated here as this bearer service is outside the scope of the UMTS
network.
Having said that the End-to-End Bearer Service is beyond the scope of the present document it is however the various
services offered by the UMTS Bearer Service that the UMTS operator offers. It is this bearer service that provides the
UMTS QoS.
The External Bearer Service is not further elaborated here as this bearer may be using several network services, e.g.
another UMTS Bearer Service.
6.1.2 The Radio Access Bearer Service and the Core Network Bearer Service
As described in the previous clause it is the UMTS Bearer Service that provides the UMTS QoS. The UMTS Bearer
Service consists of two parts, the Radio Access Bearer Service and the Core Network Bearer Service. Both services
reflects the optimised way to realise the UMTS Bearer Service over the respective cellular network topology taking into
account such aspects as e.g. mobility and mobile subscriber profiles.
3GPP
Release 12
11
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
The Radio Access Bearer Service provides confidential transport of signalling and user data between MT and CN Edge
Node with the QoS adequate to the negotiated UMTS Bearer Service or with the default QoS for signalling. This
service is based on the characteristics of the radio interface and is maintained for a moving MT.
If unequal error protection shall be supported, it is provided by underlying Radio Bearer Services. In this case the
payload of the user data SDU, transported by the Radio Access Bearer Service, shall conform to a SDU format defined
with possible exact sizes and the payload bits statically structured per size. Each bit of the SDU payload belongs to a
defined subflow. At Radio Access Bearer Service establishment, the exact SDU payload format and required reliability
per subflow is signalled to RAN using standardised attributes (see clause 6.4.3).
In release 1999, unequal error protection for a Radio Access Bearer is only applicable for services using a codec
integrated in the core network. This implies that UMTS Bearer service can not use the attribute SDU format information
to define subflows and the payload bits of the SDUs will therefore be equally protected.
The Core Network Bearer Service of the UMTS core network connects the UMTS CN Edge Node with the CN
Gateway to the external network. The role of this service is to efficiently control and utilise the backbone network in
order to provide the contracted UMTS bearer service. The UMTS packet core network shall support different backbone
bearer services for variety of QoS.
6.1.3 The Radio Bearer Service and the RAN Access Bearer Service
The Radio Access Bearer Service is realised by a Radio Bearer Service and an RAN Access -Bearer Service.
The Radio Bearer Service covers all the aspects of the radio interface transport. This bearer service is provided by the
UTRAN FDD/TDD or the GERAN, which are not elaborated further in the present document.
To support unequal error protection, RAN and MT shall have the ability to segment/reassemble the user flows into the
different subflows requested by the Radio Access Bearer Service. The segmentation/ reassemble is given by the SDU
payload format signalled at Radio Access Bearer establishment. The Radio Bearer service handles the part of the user
flow belonging to one subflow, according to the reliability requirements for that subflow.
The RAN Access Bearer Service together with the Physical Bearer Service provides the transport between RAN and
CN. RAN Access bearer services for packet traffic shall provide different bearer services for variety of QoS. The RAN
Access Bearer Service is provided by the Iu or the Gb Bearer Service.
6.1.4 The Backbone Network Service

The Core Network Bearer Service uses a generic Backbone Network Service.
The Backbone Network Service covers the layer 1/Layer2 functionality and is selected according to operator's choice in
order to fulfil the QoS requirements of the Core Network Bearer Service. The Backbone Network Service is not specific
to UMTS but may reuse an existing standard.
6.2 QoS Management Functions in the Network

The purpose of this clause is to give a comprehensive overview of functionality needed to establish, modify and
maintain a UMTS Bearer Service with a specific QoS. The relations between the functions internal to the nodes are
implementation specific. The allocation of these functions to the UMTS entities shall indicate the requirement for the
specific entity to enforce the QoS commitments negotiated for the UMTS bearer service. The specific realisation of
these functions is implementation dependent and has only to maintain the specified QoS characteristics. The QoS
management functions of all UMTS entities together shall ensure the provision of the negotiated service between the
access points of the UMTS bearer service. The end-to-end service is provided by translation/mapping with UMTS
external services.
3GPP
Release 12
12
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
6.2.1 Description of functions

6.2.1.1 QoS management functions for UMTS bearer service in the control
plane
Service Manager co-ordinates the functions of the control plane for establishing, modifying and maintaining the
service it is responsible for. And, it provides all user plane QoS management functions with the relevant attributes. The
service manager offers services to other instances, it signals with peer service managers and uses services provided by
other instances. The service manager may perform an attribute translation to request lower layer services. Furthermore,
it may interrogate other control functions to receive permission for service provision.
Translation function converts between the internal service primitives for UMTS bearer service control and the various
protocols for service control of interfacing external networks. The translation includes the converting between UMTS
bearer service attributes and QoS attributes of the external networks service control protocol (e.g. between IETF TSPEC
and UMTS service attributes). The service manager may include a translation function to convert between its service
attributes and the attributes of a lower layer service it is using.
Admission/Capability control maintains information about all available resources of a network entity and about all
resources allocated to UMTS bearer services. It determines for each UMTS bearer service request or modification
whether the required resources can be provided by this entity and it reserves these resources if allocated to the UMTS
bearer service. The function checks also the capability of the network entity to provide the requested service, i.e.
whether the specific service is implemented and not blocked for administrative reasons. The resource control performed
by the admission control supports also the service retention.
Subscription Control checks the administrative rights of the UMTS bearer service user to use the requested service
with the specified QoS attributes.
6.2.1.2
Functions for UMTS bearer service in the user plane
User plane QoS management functions maintain the signalling and user data traffic within certain limits, defined by
specific QoS attributes. UMTS bearer services with different QoS attribute values shall be supported by the QoS
management functions. These functions ensure the provision of the QoS negotiated for a UMTS bearer service.
Mapping function provides each data unit with the specific marking required to receive the intended QoS at the
transfer by a bearer service.
Classification function assigns data units to the established services of a MT according to the related QoS attributes if
the MT has multiple UMTS bearer services established. The appropriate UMTS bearer service is derived from the data
unit header or from traffic characteristics of the data.
Resource Manager distributes the available resources between all services sharing the same resource. The resource
manager distributes the resources according to the required QoS. Example means for resource management are
scheduling, bandwidth management and power control for the radio bearer.
Traffic conditioner provides conformance between the negotiated QoS for a service and the data unit traffic. Traffic
conditioning is performed by policing or by traffic shaping. The policing function compares the data unit traffic with the
related QoS attributes. Data units not matching the relevant attributes will be dropped or marked as not matching, for
preferential dropping in case of congestion. The traffic shaper forms the data unit traffic according to the QoS of the
service. The reference algorithm for traffic conditioning is described in Annex B. This reference algorithm should not be
interpreted as a required implementation algorithm.
6.2.2 Allocation of QoS management functions

6.2.2.1 QoS management functions for UMTS bearer service in the control
plane
The QoS management functions for controlling the UMTS bearer service are shown in figure 2. These control functions
support the establishment and the modification of a UMTS bearer service by signalling/negotiation with the UMTS
external services and by the establishment or modification of all UMTS internal services with the required
characteristics.
3GPP
Release 12
13
MT
TE
Transl.
Local
Service
Control
Adm./Cap.
Control
UMTS BS
Manager
Local BS
Manager
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
RAN
CN EDGE
Adm./Cap.
Control
Adm./Cap.
Control
Subscr.
Control
UMTS BS
Manager
RAB
Manager
Gateway
Adm./Cap.
Control
Radio BS
Manager
RA BS
Manager
RA BS
Manager
CN BS
Manager
CN BS
Manager
RAN
ph. BS M
RAN
ph. BS M
RA NS
Manager
RA NS
Manager
BB NS
Manager
BB NS
Manager
protocol interface
Transl.
UMTS BS
Manager
Radio BS
Manager
Ext.
Netw.
Ext.
Service
Control
Ext. BS
Manager
service primitive interface
Figure 2: QoS management functions for UMTS bearer service in the control plane
The translation functions (Trans.) in the MT and the Gateway convert between external service signalling and internal
service primitives including the translation of the service attributes. The translation function in the Gateway is FFS
regarding packet oriented services.
The UMTS BS manager in the MT, CN EDGE and the Gateway signal between each other and via the translation
function with external instances to establish or modify a UMTS bearer service. Each of the UMTS BS managers
interrogates its associated admission/capability control whether the network entity supports the specific requested
service and whether the required resources are available. Additionally, the CN EDGE UMTS BS manager verifies with
the subscription control the administrative rights for using the service.
The UMTS BS manager of the MT translates the UMTS bearer service attributes into attributes for the local bearer
service and requests this service from the local BS manager.
The UMTS BS manager of the CN EDGE translates the UMTS bearer service attributes into RAB service attributes and
RAN Access bearer service attributes and it translates UMTS bearer service attributes into CN bearer service attributes.
Also, the UMTS BS manager of the CN EDGE requests its RAN Access BS manager, its CN BS manager and the RAB
manager in the RAN to provide the required services.
The RAB manager verifies with its admission/capability control whether the RAN supports the specific requested
service and whether the required resources are available. It translates the RAB service attributes into radio bearer
service and RAN Access bearer service attributes and requests the radio BS manager and the RAN Access BS manager
to provide bearer services with the required attributes.
The Gateway UMTS BS manager translates the UMTS bearer service attributes into CN bearer service attributes and
requests its CN BS manager to provide the service. Furthermore, it translates the UMTS bearer service attributes into
the external bearer service attributes and requests this service from the external BS manager.
Radio, RAN Access and CN BS managers use services provided by lower layers as indicated in figure 2.
3GPP
Release 12
14
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
6.2.2.2 QoS management functions for the UMTS bearer service in the user
plane
The QoS management functions of the UMTS BS for the user plane are shown in figure 3. These functions maintain the
data transfer characteristics according to the commitments established by the UMTS BS control functions and expressed
by the bearer service attributes. The QoS management user plane functions are provided with the relevant attributes by
the QoS management control functions.
TE
MT
RAN
CN EDGE
Gateway
Ext.
Netw.
Class
if.
Class
if.
Cond.
Cond.
Cond.
Local BS
Resource
Manager
Resource
Manager
RAN phys. BS
data flow with indication of
Mapper
Resource
Manager
Mapper
Resource
Manager
RAN Access network service
Mapper
Resource
Manager
Resource
Manager
External BS
BB network service
direction
Figure 3: QoS management functions for the UMTS bearer service in the user plane
The classification function (Class.) in the Gateway and in the MT assign user data units received from the external
bearer service or the local bearer service to the appropriate UMTS bearer service according to the QoS requirements of
each user data unit. The classification function in the MT is FFS.
The traffic conditioner (Cond.) in the MT provides conformance of the uplink user data traffic with the QoS attributes
of the relevant UMTS bearer service. In the Gateway a traffic conditioner may provide conformance of the downlink
user data traffic with the QoS attributes of the relevant UMTS bearer service; i.e. on a per PDP context basis. In
addition, the traffic conditioner in the Gateway may provide conformance of the uplink and downlink user data traffic
with QoS attributes related to the whole non-guaranteed bit-rate traffic of a UE for an APN (i.e. APN-AMBR). The
packet oriented transport of the downlink data units from the external bearer service to the RAN and the buffering in the
RAN may result in bursts of downlink data units not conformant with the UMTS BS QoS attributes. A traffic
conditioner in the RAN forms this downlink data unit traffic according to the relevant QoS attributes. In addition, the
traffic conditioner in the RAN may provide conformance of the uplink and downlink user data traffic (traffic) with QoS
attributes related to the whole non-guaranteed bit-rate traffic of a UE (i.e. UE-AMBR).
The traffic conditioners are not necessarily separated functions. For example a resource manager may also provide
conformance with the relevant QoS attributes by appropriate data unit scheduling. Or, if fixed resources are dedicated to
one bearer service the resource limitations implicitly condition the traffic.
The mapping function marks each data unit with the specific QoS indication related to the bearer service performing the
transfer of the data unit.
Each of the resource managers of a network entity is responsible for a specific resource. The resource manager
distributes its resources between all bearer services requesting transfer of data units on these resources. Thereby, the
resource manager attempts to provide the QoS attributes required for each individual bearer service.
3GPP
Release 12
15
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
6.3 UMTS QoS Classes

When defining the UMTS QoS classes, also referred to as traffic classes, the restrictions and limitations of the air
interface have to be taken into account. It is not reasonable to define complex mechanisms as have been in fixed
networks due to different error characteristics of the air interface. The QoS mechanisms provided in the cellular network
have to be robust and capable of providing reasonable QoS resolution. Table 1 illustrates the QoS classes for UMTS.
There are four different QoS classes:
-
conversational class;
streaming class;
interactive class; and
background class.
The main distinguishing factor between these QoS classes is how delay sensitive the traffic is: Conversational class is
meant for traffic which is very delay sensitive while Background class is the most delay insensitive traffic class.
Conversational and Streaming classes are mainly intended to be used to carry real-time traffic flows. The main divider
between them is how delay sensitive the traffic is. Conversational real-time services, like video telephony, are the most
delay sensitive applications and those data streams should be carried in Conversational class.
Interactive class and Background are mainly meant to be used by traditional Internet applications like WWW, Email,
Telnet, FTP and News. Due to looser delay requirements, compare to conversational and streaming classes, both
provide better error rate by means of channel coding and retransmission. The main difference between Interactive and
Background class is that Interactive class is mainly used by interactive applications, e.g. interactive Email or interactive
Web browsing, while Background class is meant for background traffic, e.g. background download of Emails or
background file downloading. Responsiveness of the interactive applications is ensured by separating interactive and
background applications. Traffic in the Interactive class has higher priority in scheduling than Background class traffic,
so background applications use transmission resources only when interactive applications do not need them. This is
very important in wireless environment where the bandwidth is low compared to fixed networks.
However, these are only typical examples of usage of the traffic classes. There is in particular no strict one-to-one
mapping between classes of service (as defined in TS 22.105 [5]) and the traffic classes defined in this TS. For instance,
a service interactive by nature can very well use the Conversational traffic class if the application or the user has tight
requirements on delay.
6.3.1 Conversational class

The most well known use of this scheme is telephony speech (e.g. GSM). But with Internet and multimedia a number of
new applications will require this scheme, for example voice over IP and video conferencing tools. Real time
conversation is always performed between peers (or groups) of live (human) end-users. This is the only scheme where
the required characteristics are strictly given by human perception.
Real time conversation scheme is characterised by that the transfer time shall be low because of the conversational
nature of the scheme and at the same time that the time relation (variation) between information entities of the stream
shall be preserved in the same way as for real time streams. The maximum transfer delay is given by the human
perception of video and audio conversation. Therefore the limit for acceptable transfer delay is very strict, as failure to
provide low enough transfer delay will result in unacceptable lack of quality. The transfer delay requirement is therefore
both significantly lower and more stringent than the round trip delay of the interactive traffic case.
Real time conversation - fundamental characteristics for QoS:
-
preserve time relation (variation) between information entities of the stream;
conversational pattern (stringent and low delay).
3GPP
Release 12
16
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
6.3.2 Streaming class

When the user is looking at (listening to) real time video (audio) the scheme of real time streams applies. The real time
data flow is always aiming at a live (human) destination. It is a one way transport.
This scheme is one of the newcomers in data communication, raising a number of new requirements in both
telecommunication and data communication systems. It is characterised by that the time relations (variation) between
information entities (i.e. samples, packets) within a flow shall be preserved, although it does not have any requirements
on low transfer delay.
The delay variation of the end-to-end flow shall be limited, to preserve the time relation (variation) between information
entities of the stream. But as the stream normally is time aligned at the receiving end (in the user equipment), the
highest acceptable delay variation over the transmission media is given by the capability of the time alignment function
of the application. Acceptable delay variation is thus much greater than the delay variation given by the limits of human
perception.
Real time streams - fundamental characteristics for QoS:
-
preserve time relation (variation) between information entities of the stream.
6.3.3 Interactive class

When the end-user, that is either a machine or a human, is on line requesting data from remote equipment (e.g. a
server), this scheme applies. Examples of human interaction with the remote equipment are: web browsing, data base
retrieval, server access. Examples of machines interaction with remote equipment are: polling for measurement records
and automatic data base enquiries (tele-machines).
Interactive traffic is the other classical data communication scheme that on an overall level is characterised by the
request response pattern of the end-user. At the message destination there is an entity expecting the message (response)
within a certain time. Round trip delay time is therefore one of the key attributes. Another characteristic is that the
content of the packets shall be transparently transferred (with low bit error rate).
Interactive traffic - fundamental characteristics for QoS:
-
request response pattern;
preserve payload content.
6.3.4 Background class

When the end-user, that typically is a computer, sends and receives data-files in the background, this scheme applies.
Examples are background delivery of E-mails, SMS, download of databases and reception of measurement records.
Background traffic is one of the classical data communication schemes that on an overall level is characterised by that
the destination is not expecting the data within a certain time. The scheme is thus more or less delivery time insensitive.
Another characteristic is that the content of the packets shall be transparently transferred (with low bit error rate).
Background traffic - fundamental characteristics for QoS:
-
the destination is not expecting the data within a certain time;
preserve payload content.
3GPP
Release 12
17
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Table 1: UMTS QoS classes

Traffic class
Fundamental
characteristics
Conversational class
conversational RT
-
Example of the
application
Preserve time relation (variation) between

information entities of
the stream
Conversational
pattern (stringent and
low delay )
voice
-
Streaming class
streaming RT
Interactive class
Interactive best effort
Preserve time
relation (variation)
between information
entities of the
stream
streaming video
Request response
pattern
Preserve payload
content
Web browsing
Background
Background best
effort
- Destination is
not expecting
the data within a
certain time
-
Preserve
payload content
background
download of
emails
6.4 QoS Attributes

NOTE:
The discussion of UMTS bearer service attributes as well as radio access bearer attributes is still going
on. Especially the bitrate attributes are under discussion and few comments have also been given to
reliability attribute.
6.4.1 Asymmetric Bearers

Uni-directional and bi-directional bearer services shall be supported. For bi-directional bearer services, the attributes
Maximum bitrate, and Guaranteed bitrate should be possible to set separately for uplink/downlink in order to support
asymmetric bearers.
6.4.2 Sources of UMTS Bearer Service Attributes

UMTS bearer service attributes describe the service provided by the UMTS network to the user of the UMTS bearer
service. A set of QoS attributes (QoS profile) specifies this service. At UMTS bearer service establishment or
modification different QoS profiles have to be taken into account.
-
The UE capabilities form a QoS profile which may limit the UMTS bearer service which can be provided.
The UE or the terminal equipment (TE) within the terminating network may request a QoS profile at UMTS
bearer establishment or modification. The application using the UE may request the UE to provide a UMTS
bearer service with a specific QoS profile. If the application requests no specific QoS the UE may use a QoS
profile configured within the UE (e.g., by AT commands). How the TE derives a QoS profile is out of scope for
UMTS.
A QoS profile in the UMTS subscription describes the upper limits for the provided service if the service user
requests specific values.
If the UE requests or modifies a UMTS bearer and one or more of the QoS attributes are not specified by the UE
by setting the attributes to 'subscribed', the SGSN shall assume a request of values as specified in the QoS profile
in the UMTS subscription. If the UE sets the traffic class to 'subscribed', the SGSN shall assume a request for
Interactive class. When the application in the UE requires streaming or conversational QoS, then the UE shall at
least explicitly request the traffic class and should explicitly request the guaranteed bit rate and the maximum bit
rate. For the rest of the QoS attributes, the network shall ensure that the negotiated QoS contains only values
explicitly defined for the traffic class.
A Network specific QoS profile characterising for example the current resource availability or other network
capabilities or limitations may limit the provided UMTS bearer service or initiate a modification of an
established UMTS bearer service.
3GPP
Release 12
18
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
6.4.3 UMTS Bearer Service Attributes

6.4.3.1
List of attributes
Traffic class ('conversational', 'streaming', 'interactive', 'background')

Definition: type of application for which the UMTS bearer service is optimised
[Purpose:
By including the traffic class itself as an attribute, UMTS can make assumptions about the traffic
source and optimise the transport for that traffic type.]
Maximum bitrate (kbps)

Definition: maximum number of bits delivered by UMTS and to UMTS at a SAP within a period of time, divided by the
duration of the period. The traffic is conformant with Maximum bitrate as long as it follows a token bucket algorithm
where token rate equals Maximum bitrate and bucket size equals Maximum SDU size.
The conformance definition should not be interpreted as a required implementation algorithm. The token bucket
algorithm is described in annex B.
The Maximum bitrate is the upper limit a user or application can accept or provide. All UMTS bearer service attributes
may be fulfilled for traffic up to the Maximum bitrate depending on the network conditions.
[Purpose:
Maximum bitrate can be used to make code reservations in the downlink of the radio interface. Its
purpose is 1) to limit the delivered bitrate to applications or external networks with such
limitations 2) to allow maximum wanted user bitrate to be defined for applications able to operate
with different rates (e.g. applications with adapting codecs).]
Guaranteed bitrate (kbps)

Definition: guaranteed number of bits delivered by UMTS at a SAP within a period of time (provided that there is data
to deliver), divided by the duration of the period. The traffic is conformant with the guaranteed bitrate as long as it
follows a token bucket algorithm where token rate equals Guaranteed bitrate and bucket size equals Maximum SDU
size.
UMTS bearer service attributes, e.g. delay and reliability attributes, are guaranteed for traffic up to the Guaranteed
bitrate. For the traffic exceeding the Guaranteed bitrate the UMTS bearer service attributes are not guaranteed.
[Purpose:
Describes the bitrate the UMTS bearer service shall guarantee to the user or application.
Guaranteed bitrate may be used to facilitate admission control based on available resources, and
for resource allocation within UMTS.]
Delivery order (y/n)

Definition: indicates whether the UMTS bearer shall provide in-sequence SDU delivery or not.
[Purpose:
the attribute is derived from the user protocol (PDP type) and specifies if out-of-sequence SDUs
are acceptable or not. This information cannot be extracted from the traffic class. Whether out-ofsequence SDUs are dropped or re-ordered depends on the specified reliability]
Delivery order should be set to 'no' for PDP Type = 'IPv4' or 'IPv6'. The SGSN shall ensure that the appropriate value is
set.
Maximum SDU size (octets)
Definition: the maximum SDU size for which the network shall satisfy the negotiated QoS.
[Purpose:
The maximum SDU size is used for admission control and policing and/or optimising transport
(optimized transport in for example the RAN may be dependent on the size of the packets).
Handling by the network of packets larger than Maximum SDU size is implementation specific
(e.g. they may be dropped or forwarded with decreased QoS).]
3GPP
Release 12
NOTE:
19
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
The Maximum Transfer Unit (MTU) of the IP layer and the Maximum SDU Size have no relationship; in
particular the GGSN should not perform IP fragmentation based on the Maximum SDU Size.
SDU format information (bits)

Definition: list of possible exact sizes of SDUs
[Purpose:
RAN needs SDU size information to be able to operate in transparent RLC protocol mode, which
is beneficial to spectral efficiency and delay when RLC re-transmission is not used. Thus, if the
application can specify SDU sizes, the bearer is less expensive.]
SDU error ratio

Definition: Indicates the fraction of SDUs lost or detected as erroneous. SDU error ratio is defined only for conforming
traffic.
NOTE 1: By reserving resources, SDU error ratio performance is independent of the loading conditions, whereas
without reserved resources, such as in Interactive and Background classes, SDU error ratio is used as
target value.
[Purpose:
Used to configure the protocols, algorithms and error detection schemes, primarily within RAN.]
Residual bit error ratio

Definition: Indicates the undetected bit error ratio in the delivered SDUs. If no error detection is requested, Residual bit
error ratio indicates the bit error ratio in the delivered SDUs.
[Purpose:
Used to configure radio interface protocols, algorithms and error detection coding.]
Delivery of erroneous SDUs (y/n/-)

Definition: Indicates whether SDUs detected as erroneous shall be delivered or discarded.
NOTE 2: 'yes' implies that error detection is employed and that erroneous SDUs are delivered together with an
error indication, 'no' implies that error detection is employed and that erroneous SDUs are discarded, and
'-' implies that SDUs are delivered without considering error detection.
[Purpose:
Used to decide whether error detection is needed and whether frames with detected errors shall be
forwarded or not.]
Transfer delay (ms)

Definition: Indicates maximum delay for 95th percentile of the distribution of delay for all delivered SDUs during the
lifetime of a bearer service, where delay for an SDU is defined as the time from a request to transfer an SDU at one
SAP to its delivery at the other SAP.
[Purpose:
relates to the delay tolerated by the application. In conjunction with the SDU error ratio attribute,
care needs to be taken in deriving the value for the 95th percentile when an application desires, for
example, that 99.9% of all transmitted packets are delivered within a certain time. This attribute
allows RAN to set transport formats and ARQ parameters.]
NOTE 3: Transfer delay of an arbitrary SDU is not meaningful for a bursty source, since the last SDUs of a burst
may have long delay due to queuing, whereas the meaningful response delay perceived by the user is the
delay of the first SDU of the burst.
Traffic handling priority
Definition: specifies the relative importance for handling of all SDUs belonging to the UMTS bearer compared to the
SDUs of other bearers.
[Purpose:
Within the interactive class, there is a definite need to differentiate between bearer qualities. This
is handled by using the traffic handling priority attribute, to allow UMTS to schedule traffic
accordingly. By definition, priority is an alternative to absolute guarantees, and thus these two
attribute types cannot be used together for a single bearer.]
Allocation/Retention Priority
3GPP
Release 12
20
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Definition: specifies the relative importance compared to other UMTS bearers for allocation and retention of the UMTS
bearer. The Allocation/Retention Priority attribute is a subscription attribute which is not negotiated from the mobile
terminal, but the value might be changed either by the SGSN or the GGSN network element.
NOTE 4: The addition of a user-controlled Allocation/Retention Priority attribute is for further study in future
releases.
[Purpose:
Priority is used for differentiating between bearers when performing allocation and retention of a
bearer. In situations where resources are scarce, the relevant network elements can use the
Allocation/Retention Priority to prioritize bearers with a high Allocation/Retention Priority over
bearers with a low Allocation/Retention Priority when performing admission control.]
Source statistics descriptor ('speech'/'unknown')

Definition: specifies characteristics of the source of submitted SDUs.
Editor's note: The number of different source statistics descriptors that should be allowed is FFS.
[Purpose:
Conversational speech has a well-known statistical behaviour (or the discontinuous transmission
(DTX) factor). By being informed that the SDUs for a UMTS bearer are generated by a speech
source, RAN, the SGSN and the GGSN and also the UE may, based on experience, calculate a
statistical multiplex gain for use in admission control on the relevant interfaces.]
Signalling Indication (Yes/No)

Definition: Indicates the signalling nature of the submitted SDUs. This attribute is additional to the other QoS attributes
and does not over-ride them. This attribute is only defined for the interactive traffic class. If signalling indication is set
to 'Yes', the UE should set the traffic handling priority to '1'.
[Purpose:
NOTE:
Signalling traffic can have different characteristics to other interactive traffic, e.g. higher priority,
lower delay and increased peakiness. This attribute permits enhancing the RAN operation
accordingly. An example use of the Signalling Indication is for IMS signalling traffic.]
This indication is sent by the UE in the QoS IE.
Evolved Allocation/Retention Priority

Definition: Enhances the Allocation/Retention Priority attribute with an increased value range of the priority level and
additional information about the pre-emption capability and the pre-emption vulnerability of the bearer. The preemption capability information defines whether a bearer with a lower priority level should be dropped to free up the
required resources. The pre-emption vulnerability information whether a bearer is applicable for such dropping by a
pre-emption capable bearer with a higher priority value.
6.4.3.2
Attributes discussed per traffic class
If the UMTS bearer carries speech service, Source statistics descriptor can be set, which allows UMTS to calculate a
statistical multiplexing gain in core network, RAN and UE and use that for admission control.
The support for SRVCC requires conversational class and Source statistics descriptor set to speech only be used for
IMS speech sessions in accordance to TS 23.216 [11].
NOTE:
Triggering SRVCC will cause service interruption and/or inconsistent service experience when using
conversational class and Source statistics descriptor set to speech for non-IMS services.
Although the bitrate of a conversational source codec may vary, conversational traffic is assumed to be relatively
non-bursty. Maximum bitrate specifies the upper limit of the bitrate with which the UMTS bearer delivers SDUs at the
SAPs. The UMTS bearer is not required to transfer traffic exceeding the Guaranteed bitrate. Maximum and
guaranteed bitrate attributes are used for resource allocation within UMTS. Minimum resource requirement is
determined by guaranteed bitrate (When a conversational source generates less traffic than allocated for the bearer, the
unused resources can of course be used by other bearers).
Since the traffic is non-bursty, it is meaningful to guarantee a transfer delay of an arbitrary SDU.
3GPP
Release 12
21
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Conversational bearers are likely to be realised in RAN without RLC re-transmissions. Hence, RAN transport is more
efficient and thereby cheaper if RLC PDU size is adapted to UMTS bearer SDU size (RLC transparent mode). This
motivates the use of SDU format information. The SDU periodicity knowledge needed to operate in RLC transparent
mode is obtained through dividing the largest defined SDU format by Maximum bitrate. This shall be considered when
setting the attribute values in a service request.
The Maximum SDU size is only applicable if SDU format information is not specified and is used for admission
control and policing and/or optimising transport. If Maximum SDU size is specified the SDU size is variable. If SDU
format information is specified, with one or several possible sizes, each SDU shall exactly conform to one of the
specified sizes. By using the SDU error ratio, Residual bit error ratio and Delivery of erroneous SDUs attribute, the
application requirement on error rate can be specified, as well as whether the application wants UMTS to detect and
discard SDUs containing errors and an adequate forward error correction means can be selected.
Streaming class
If the UMTS bearer carries streaming speech service, Source statistics descriptor can be set, which allows UMTS to
calculate a statistical multiplexing gain in core network, RAN and UE and use that for admission control.
As for conversational class, streaming traffic is assumed to be rather non-bursty. Maximum bitrate specifies the upper
limit of the bitrate the UMTS bearer delivers SDUs at the SAPs. The UMTS bearer is not required to transfer traffic
exceeding the Guaranteed bitrate. Maximum and guaranteed bitrate attributes are used for resource allocation within
UMTS. Minimum resource requirement is determined by guaranteed bitrate. (When a streaming source generates less
traffic than allocated for the bearer, the unused resources can of course be used by other bearers.)
Since the traffic is non-bursty, it is meaningful to guarantee a transfer delay of an arbitrary SDU.
The transfer delay requirements for streaming are typically in a range where at least in a part of this range RLC
re-transmission may be used. It is assumed that the application's requirement on delay variation is expressed through the
transfer delay attribute, which implies that there is no need for an explicit delay variation attribute.
It shall be possible for Streaming bearers to be realised in RAN without RLC re-transmissions. Hence, RAN transport is
more efficient and thereby cheaper if RLC PDU size is adapted to UMTS bearer SDU size (RLC transparent mode).
This motivates the use of SDU format information. The SDU periodicity knowledge needed to operate in RLC
transparent mode is obtained through dividing the largest defined SDU format by Maximum bitrate. This shall be
considered when setting the attribute values in a service request.
The Maximum SDU size is only applicable if SDU format information is not specified and is used for admission
control and policing and/or optimising transport. If Maximum SDU size is specified the SDU size is variable. If SDU
format information is specified, with one or several possible sizes, each SDU shall exactly conform to one of the
specified sizes.
By using the SDU error ratio, Residual bit error ratio and Delivery of erroneous SDUs attribute, the application
requirement on error rate can be specified, as well as whether the application wants UMTS to detect and discard SDUs
containing errors.
Interactive class
This bearer class is optimised for transport of human or machine interaction with remote equipment, such as web
browsing. The source characteristics are unknown but may be bursty.
To be able to limit the delivered data rate for applications and external networks by traffic conditioning, maximum
bitrate is included.
There is a definite need to differentiate between quality for bearers within the interactive class. One alternative would
be to set absolute guarantees on delay, bitrate etc, which however at present seems complex to implement within
RAN/CN. Instead, traffic handling priority is used. SDUs of a UMTS bearer with higher traffic handling priority is
given priority over SDUs of other bearers within the interactive class, through UMTS-internal scheduling.
It is principally impossible to combine this relative approach with attributes specifying delay, bitrate, packet loss etc, so
an interactive bearer gives no quality guarantees, and the actual bearer quality will depend on the load of the system and
the admission control policy of the network operator.
The only additional attribute that is reasonable to specify is the bit integrity of the delivered data, which is given by
SDU error ratio, Residual bit error ratio and Delivery of erroneous SDUs. Because there are no reserved resources
3GPP
Release 12
22
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
for interactive class, SDU error ratio should be used as a target value. SDU error ratio cannot be guaranteed under
abnormal load conditions.
If the Signalling Indication is set, a statistical multiplexing gain and/or improvements in signalling speed may be
obtained within the UTRAN.
Background class
The background class is optimised for machine-to-machine communication that is not delay sensitive, such as
messaging services. Background applications tolerate a higher delay than applications using the interactive class, which
is the main difference between the background and interactive classes.
UMTS only transfers background class SDUs when there is definite spare capacity in the network. To be able to limit
the delivered data rate for applications and external networks by traffic conditioning, maximum bitrate is included.
No other guarantee than bit integrity in the delivered data, given by SDU error ratio, Residual bit error ratio and
Delivery of erroneous SDUs , is needed. Because there are no reserved resources for background class, SDU error ratio
should be used as a target value. SDU error ratio cannot be guaranteed under abnormal load conditions.
6.4.3.3
UMTS bearer attributes: summary
In table 2, the defined UMTS bearer attributes and their relevancy for each bearer traffic class are summarised. Observe
that traffic class is an attribute itself.
Table 2: UMTS bearer attributes defined for each bearer traffic class
Traffic class
Maximum bitrate
Delivery order
Maximum SDU size
SDU format
information
SDU error ratio
Delivery of erroneous
SDUs
Transfer delay
Guaranteed bit rate
Allocation/Retention
priority
Source statistics
descriptor
Signalling indication
Evolved
priority
X
X
X
X
Streaming class
X
X
X
X
Interactive class
X
X
X
Background class
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
6.4.4 Radio Access Bearer Service Attributes

Radio Access Bearer Service Attributes shall be applied to both CS and PS domains.
6.4.4.1
List of attributes
Traffic class ('conversational', 'streaming', 'interactive', 'background')

Definition: type of application for which the Radio Access Bearer service is optimised.
[Purpose:
By including the traffic class itself as an attribute, RAN can make assumptions about the traffic
source and optimise the transport for that traffic type. In particular, buffer allocation may be based
on traffic class.]
Maximum bitrate (kbps)
3GPP
Release 12
23
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Definition: maximum number of bits delivered by RAN and to RAN at a SAP within a period of time, divided by the
duration of the period. The traffic is conformant with the Maximum bitrate as long as it follows a token bucket
algorithm where token rate equals Maximum bitrate and bucket size equals Maximum SDU size.
The Maximum bitrate is the upper limit a user or application can accept or provide. All RAB attributes may be fulfilled
for traffic up to the Maximum bitrate depending on the network conditions.
[Purpose: 1)
to limit the delivered bitrate to applications or external networks with such limitations, 2) to allow
maximum wanted RAB bitrate to be defined for applications able to operate with different rates
(e.g. applications with adapting codecs.)]
Guaranteed bitrate (kbps)

Definition: guaranteed number of bits delivered at a SAP within a period of time (provided that there is data to deliver),
divided by the duration of the period. The traffic is conformant with the Guaranteed bitrate as long as it follows a token
bucket algorithm where token rate equals Guaranteed bitrate and bucket size equals Maximum SDU size.
RAB attributes, e.g. delay and reliability attributes, are guaranteed for traffic up to the Guaranteed bitrate. For the traffic
exceeding the Guaranteed bitrate the RAB attributes are not guaranteed.
[Purpose:
Describes the bitrate the RAB shall guarantee to the user or application. Guaranteed bitrate may be
used to facilitate admission control based on available resources, and for resource allocation within
RAN.. The guaranteed bitrate at the RAB level may be different from that on UMTS bearer level,
for example due to header compression.]
Delivery order (y/n)

Definition: indicates whether the UMTS bearer shall provide in-sequence SDU delivery or not.
[Purpose:
NOTE:
specifies if out-of-sequence SDUs are acceptable or not. This information cannot be extracted
from the traffic class. Whether out-of-sequence SDUs are dropped or re-ordered depends on the
specified reliability.]
Delivery order should be set to 'no' for PDP Type = 'IPv4' or 'IPv6'.

Definition: the maximum SDU size for which the network shall satisfy the negotiated QoS.
[Purpose:
The maximum SDU size is used for admission control and policing and/or optimising transport
(optimized transport in for example the RAN may be dependent on the size of the packets).
Handling by the network of packets larger than Maximum SDU size is implementation specific
(e.g. they may be dropped or forwarded with decreased QoS).]
SDU format information (bits)

Definition: list of possible exact sizes of SDUs. If unequal error protection shall be used by a Radio Access Bearer
service, SDU format information defines the exact subflow format of the SDU payload. SDU format information also
supports definition of allowed subflow bitrates.
NOTE 1: SDU format information is used by RAN to define which bits of the payload that belongs to each
subflow. Exact syntax of SDU format information attribute is the task of RAN WG3.
[Purpose:
RAN needs SDU format information to be able to operate in transparent RLC protocol mode,
which is beneficial to spectral efficiency and delay when RLC re-transmission is not used. Thus, if
the application can specify SDU sizes, the bearer is less expensive. Moreover, in case of unequal
error protection, RAN needs to know the exact format of SDU payload to be able to demultiplex
the SDU onto different radio bearer services. When rate control is applied to services having a
constant SDU size, e.g. CS data, the subflow bitrate is used to calculate the allowed inter PDU
transmission interval (IPTI).]
3GPP
Release 12
24
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
SDU error ratio

Definition: Indicates the fraction of SDUs lost or detected as erroneous. SDU error ratio is defined only for conforming
traffic. In case of unequal error protection., SDU error ratio is set per subflow and represents the error ratio in each
subflow. SDU error ratio is only set for subflows for which error detection is requested.
NOTE 2: By reserving resources, SDU error ratio performance is independent of the loading conditions, whereas
without reserved resources, such as in Interactive and Background classes, SDU error ratio is used as
target value.
[Purpose:
Used to configure protocols, algorithms and error detection schemes, primarily within RAN.]

Definition: Indicates the undetected bit error ratio for each subflow in the delivered SDUs. For equal error protection,
only one value is needed. If no error detection is requested for a subflow, Residual bit error ratio indicates the bit error
ratio in that subflow of the delivered SDUs.
[Purpose:
Used to configure radio interface protocols, algorithms and error detection coding. For services
requiring unequal error protection, residual bit error ratio is given for each subflow.]
Delivery of erroneous SDUs (y/n/-)

Definition: Indicates whether SDUs with detected errors shall be delivered or not. In case of unequal error protection,
the attribute is set per subflow.
NOTE 3: 'yes' implies that error detection is employed and that erroneous SDUs are delivered together with an
error indication, 'no' implies that error detection is employed and that erroneous SDUs are discarded, and
'-' implies that SDUs are delivered without considering error detection.
In case of unequal protection, different subflows may have different settings. Whenever there is a detected error in a
subflow with 'no', the SDU is discarded, irrespective of settings in other subflows. For an SDU with multiple subflows
with a 'yes' setting, there may be one error indication per subflow, or, if there is only one error indication per SDU, it
indicates that an error was detected in at least one of these subflows. Exact definitions are the task of RAN3.
[Purpose:
Used to decide whether error detection is needed and whether frames with detected errors shall be
forwarded or discarded.]
Transfer delay (ms)

Definition: Indicates maximum delay for 95th percentile of the distribution of delay for all delivered SDUs during the
lifetime of a bearer service, where delay for an SDU is defined as the time from a request to transfer an SDU at one
SAP to its delivery at the other SAP.
[Purpose:
permits the derivation of the RAN part of the total transfer delay for the UMTS bearer. In
conjunction with the SDU error ratio attribute, care needs to be taken in deriving the value for the
95th percentile when an application desires, for example, that 99.9% of all transmitted packets are
delivered within a certain time. This attribute allows RAN to set transport formats and ARQ
parameters.]

Definition: specifies the relative importance for handling of all SDUs belonging to the radio access bearer compared to
the SDUs of other bearers.
[Purpose:
Within the interactive class, there is a definite need to differentiate between bearer qualities. This
is handled by using the traffic handling priority attribute, to allow RAN to schedule traffic
accordingly. By definition, priority is an alternative to absolute guarantees, and thus these two
attribute types cannot be used together for a single bearer.]
Allocation/Retention Priority
Definition: specifies the relative importance compared to other Radio access bearers for allocation and retention of the
Radio access bearer. For PS services the Allocation/Retention Priority attribute of the Radio access bearer is derived
from the UMTS bearer service attributes Allocation/Retention Priority. Other attributes may be used in addition. For CS
services the Allocation/Retention Priority attribute of the Radio access bearer is derived from the eMLPP priority level
3GPP
Release 12
25
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
attribute (TS 23.067 [9]) and/or the CS Allocation/Retention Priority attribute (TS 23.008 [8]) and/or the Mobile Station
Category attribute (TS 23.008 [8]) (which is only available for subscribers in their home PLMN). Other attributes may
be used in addition.
NOTE 4: The parameter is not negotiated from the mobile terminal. The addition of a user-controlled
Allocation/Retention Priority attribute is for further study in future releases.
[Purpose:
Priority is used for differentiating between bearers when performing allocation and retention of a
bearer. In situations where resources are scarce, the relevant network elements can use the
Allocation/Retention Priority to prioritize bearers with a high Allocation/Retention Priority over
bearers with a low Allocation/Retention Priority when performing admission control.]
Source statistics descriptor ('speech'/'unknown')

Definition: specifies characteristics of the source of submitted SDUs.
[Purpose:
Conversational speech has a well-known statistical behaviour (or the discontinuous transmission
(DTX) factor). By being informed that the SDUs for a RAB are generated by a speech source,
RAN may, based on experience, calculate a statistical multiplex gain for use in admission control
on the radio and RAN Access interfaces.]
Signalling Indication (Yes/No)

Definition: Indicates the signalling nature of the submitted SDUs. This attribute is additional to the other QoS attributes
and does not over-ride them.
[Purpose:
6.4.4.2
Signalling traffic can have different characteristics to other interactive traffic, e.g. higher priority,
lower delay and increased peakiness. This attribute permits enhancing the RAN operation
accordingly. An example use of the Signalling Indication is for IMS signalling traffic. ]
Attributes discussed per traffic class
If the RAB carries a speech service, Source statistics descriptor can be set, which allows RAN to calculate a statistical
multiplexing gain on radio and RAN Access interfaces and use that for admission control.
The support for SRVCC requires conversational class and Source statistics descriptor set to speech only be used for
IMS speech sessions in accordance to TS 23.216 [11].
NOTE:
Triggering SRVCC will cause service interruption and/or inconsistent service experience when using
conversational class and Source statistics descriptor set to speech for non-IMS services.
Unequal error protection can be supported in conversational class. In case unequal error protection is requested for a
given RAB, the attributes Delivery of erroneous SDUs, Residual bit error ratio and SDU error ratio are specified per
subflow. Delivery of erroneous SDUs determines whether error detection shall be used and, if so, whether SDUs with
error in a certain subflow shall be delivered or not. Residual bit error ratio specifies the bit error ratio for undetected
delivered bits. SDU error ratio specifies the fraction of SDUs with detected error in each subflow. It is only set for
subflows for which error detection is requested.
In case of unequal error protection the payload of the user data SDU, transported by the Radio Access Bearer Service,
shall conform to a SDU format defined with possible exact sizes. The payload bits are statically structured into
subflows. The SDU format information attribute defines the exact subflow format of SDU payload.
RAN includes a rate control protocol, making it able of controlling the rate of sources requesting this, provided that they
are periodic and that SDU format information is specified. RAN is allowed to control the rate between Guaranteed
bitrate and Maximum bitrate. Each of these two rates shall correspond to an SDU format specified in SDU format
information. For the case the SDU size is constant, as is the case for CS data, SDU format information may include a
list of possible bitrates per subflow, to allow rate control of the subflows by change of inter PDU transmission interval
(IPTI).
3GPP
Release 12
26
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Streaming class
If the RAB carries streaming speech, Source statistics descriptor can be set, which allows RAN to calculate a
statistical multiplexing gain on radio and RAN Access interfaces and use that for admission control.
Unequal error protection can be supported in streaming class. In case unequal error protection is requested for a given
RAB, the attributes Delivery of erroneous SDUs, Residual bit error ratio and SDU error ratio are specified per subflow.
Delivery of erroneous SDUs determines whether error detection shall be used and, if so, whether SDUs with error in a
certain subflow shall be delivered or not. Residual bit error ratio specifies the bit error ratio for undetected delivered
bits. SDU error ratio specifies the fraction of SDUs with detected error in each subflow. It is only set for subflows for
which error detection is requested.
In case of unequal error protection the payload of the user data SDU, transported by the Radio Access Bearer Service,
shall conform to a SDU format defined with possible exact sizes. The payload bits are statically structured into
subflows. The SDU format information attribute defines the exact subflow format of SDU payload.
RAN includes a rate control protocol, making it able of controlling the rate of sources requesting this, provided that they
are periodic and that SDU format information is specified. RAN is allowed to control the rate between Guaranteed
bitrate and Maximum bitrate. Each of these two rates shall correspond to an SDU format specified in SDU format
information. For the case the SDU size is constant, as is the case for CS data, SDU format information may include a
list of possible bitrates per subflow, to allow rate control of the subflows by change of inter PDU transmission interval
(IPTI).
Other classes
The RAB attribute sets and their use in, interactive and background classes are identical to those of UMTS bearer
services (clause 6.4.2.2).
6.4.4.3
Radio Access Bearer attributes: summary
In table 3, the defined Radio Access Bearer attributes and their relevancy for each bearer traffic class are summarised.
Observe that traffic class is an attribute itself.
Table 3: Radio Access Bearer attributes defined for each bearer traffic class
Traffic class
Maximum bitrate
Delivery order
Maximum SDU size
SDU format
information
SDU error ratio
SDUs
Transfer delay
Guaranteed bit rate
Allocation/ Retention
priority
Source statistics
descriptor
Signalling Indication
X
X
X
X
Streaming class
X
X
X
X
Interactive class
X
X
X
Background class
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
6.4.5 Radio Bearer Service Attributes

NOTE:
Defining the radio bearer service attributes is a task for RAN WG2.
3GPP
Release 12
27
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
6.4.6 RAN Access Bearer Service Attributes

The RAN Access-Bearer Service together with the Physical Bearer Service provides the transport between RAN and
CN. RAN Access bearer services for packet traffic shall provide different bearer services for variety of QoS. It is
operators' option which of QoS capabilities in Frame Relay layer, in IP layer or in ATM layer is used. For IP based RAN
Access bearer services, Differentiated Services defined by IETF shall be used. If operator choose ATM-SVC as an
internal dedicated transport bearer, inter operation with IP based networks will be based on Differentiated Services. The
mapping from UMTS QoS classes to Diffserv codepoints will be controlled by the operator. The mapping depends on
bandwidth and provisioning of resources among the different Diffserv classes which the operators control to satisfy
their cost and performance requirements. Interoperability between operators will be based on the use of service level
agreements (SLAs) which are an integral part of the Diffserv Architecture.
6.4.7 Core Network Bearer Service Attributes

The UMTS packet core network shall support different backbone bearer services for variety of QoS. It is operators'
option which of QoS capabilities in IP layer or QoS capabilities in ATM layer is used. For the IP based backbone,
Differentiated Services defined by IETF shall be used. If operator choose ATM-SVC as an internal dedicated transport
bearer, interoperation with IP based backbone networks will be based on Differentiated Services. The mapping from
UMTS QoS classes to Diffserv codepoints will be controlled by the operator. The mapping depends on bandwidth and
provisioning of resources among the different Diffserv classes which the operators control to satisfy their cost and
performance requirements. Interoperability between operators will be based on the use of service level agreements
(SLAs) which are an integral part of the Diffserv Architecture.
6.5 Attribute Value Ranges

For UMTS Bearer service and Radio Access Bearer services a list of finite attribute values or the allowed value range is
defined for each attribute. The value list/value range defines the values that are possible to be used for an attribute
considering every possible service condition. When a service is defined as a combination of attributes, further
limitations may apply; for example the shortest possible delay may not be possible to use together with the lowest
possible SDU error ratio. Service requirements, i.e. required QoS and performance for a given UMTS service is defined
in the service requirement specifications TS 22.105 [5]. The aspect of future proof coding of attributes in protocol
specifications is not considered in the defined value list/value range tables.
6.5.1 Ranges of UMTS Bearer Service Attributes

The following table lists the value ranges of the UMTS bearer service attributes. The value ranges reflect the capability
of UMTS network.
3GPP
Release 12
28
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Table 4: Value ranges for UMTS Bearer Service Attributes

Traffic class
Maximum bitrate (Gbps)
Delivery order
Maximum SDU size
(octets)
SDU format information
SDUs
Residual BER
SDU error ratio
Transfer delay (ms)
Guaranteed bit rate
(Gbps)
priority
Source statistic
descriptor
Evolved
priority
- Priority Level
- Pre-emption Capability
- Pre-emption
Vulnerability
Conversational
class
<= 10 (2)
Yes/No
<=1 500 or 1 502 (4)
Streaming class
Interactive class
Background class
<= 10 (2)
Yes/No
<=1 500 or 1 502 (4)
<= 10 (2)
Yes/No
<=1 500 or 1 502 (4)
<= 10 (2)
Yes/No
<=1 500 or 1 502 (4)
(5)
Yes/No/- (6)
(5)
Yes/No/- (6)
Yes/No/- (6)
Yes/No/- (6)
5*10-2, 10-2, 5*10-3, 103

, 10-4, 10-5, 10-6
-2
10 , 7*10-3, 10-3, 10-4,
10-5
100 maximum value
4*10-3, 10-5, 6*10-8 (7)
4*10-3, 10-5, 6*10-8 (7)
10-3, 10-4, 10-6
10-3, 10-4, 10-6
<= 10 (2)
5*10-2, 10-2, 5*10-3, 103

, 10-4, 10-5, 10-6
-1
10 , 10-2, 7*10-3, 10-3,
10-4, 10-5
300 (8) maximum
value
<= 10 (2)
1,2,3
1,2,3
1,2,3 (9)
1,2,3
1,2,3
Speech/unknown
Speech/unknown
Yes/No (9)
1-15
Yes/No
Yes/No
1-15
Yes/No
Yes/No
1-15
Yes/No
Yes/No
1-15
Yes/No
Yes/No
1) Void.
2) The value represents the protocol limit but not necessarily the system limit. The granularity of the bitrate the
information element can represent varies across the whole range.
3) Void.
4) In case of PDP type = PPP, maximum SDU size is 1502 octets. In other cases, maximum SDU size is
1 500 octets.
5) Definition of possible values of exact SDU sizes for which RAN can support transparent RLC protocol mode, is
the task of RAN WG3.
6) If Delivery of erroneous SDUs is set to 'Yes' error indications can only be provided on the MT/TE side of the
UMTS bearer. On the CN Gateway side error indications can not be signalled outside of UMTS network in
release 1999.
7) Values are derived from CRC lengths of 8, 16 and 24 bits on layer 1.
8) If the UE requests a transfer delay value lower than the minimum value, this shall not cause the network (SGSN
and GGSN) to reject the request from the UE. The network may negotiate the value for the transfer delay.
9) If signalling indication is set to 'Yes', the UE should set the traffic handling priority to '1'.
6.5.2 Ranges of Radio Access Bearer Service Attributes for UTRAN and for
GERAN
The following table lists the value ranges of the radio access bearer service attributes for UTRAN and for GERAN. The
value ranges reflect the capability of both UTRAN and GERAN.
3GPP
Release 12
29
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Table 5: Value ranges for Radio Access Bearer Service Attributes for UTRAN and for GERAN
Traffic class
Maximum bitrate (Gbps)
Delivery order
SDU format information (1)
Delivery of erroneous SDUs
Residual BER
SDU error ratio
Transfer delay (ms)
Guaranteed bit rate (Gbps)
Allocation/Retention priority
(1)
- Priority Level
- Pre-emption Capability
- Pre-emption Vulnerability
Source statistic descriptor
Conversational
class
<= 10 (2) (7)
Yes/No
<=1 500 or 1 502
(4)
(5)
Yes/No/5*10-2, 10-2, 5*10-3,
10-3, 10-4, 10-5, 10-6
10-2, 7*10-3, 10-3, 104
, 10-5
80 maximum
value
<= 10 (2) (7)
Streaming class
Interactive class
Background class
<= 10 (2) (7)

Yes/No
<=1 500 or 1 502 (4)
<= 10 (2) (7)

Yes/No
<=1 500 or 1 502
(4)
<= 10 (2) (7)

Yes/No
<=1 500 or 1 502
(4)
Yes/No/4*10-3, 10-5, 6*10-8

(6)
10-3, 10-4, 10-6
Yes/No/4*10-3, 10-5, 6*10-8

(6)
10-3, 10-4, 10-6
(5)
Yes/No/5*10-2, 10-2, 5*10-3, 103
, 10-4, 10-5, 10-6
10-1, 10-2, 7*10-3, 10-3,
10-4, 10-5
250 maximum value
<= 10 (2) (7)
1,2,3
1,2, ..., 15
Yes/No
Yes/No
Speech/unknown
1,2, ..., 15
Yes/No
Yes/No
Speech/unknown
1,2, ..., 15
Yes/No
Yes/No
1,2, ..., 15
Yes/No
Yes/No
Yes/No
1) This parameter is limited to the values 1, 2 and 3 for GERAN when the Gb Bearer Service is used and the preemption capability and vulnerability information is not used.
2) The value represents the protocol limit but not necessarily the system limit. The granularity of the bitrate the
information element can represent varies across the whole range.
3) Void.
4) In case of PDP type = PPP, maximum SDU size is 1502 octets. In other cases, maximum SDU size is
1 500 octets.
5) Definition of possible values of exact SDU sizes for which UTRAN can support transparent RLC protocol mode,
is the task of RAN WG3.
6) Values are derived from CRC lengths of 8, 16 and 24 bits on layer 1.
7) In case of GERAN the highest bitrate value is 473.6 kbps.
6.6 Bearer unrelated QoS Attributes

APN-Aggregated Maximum Bit-rate (kbps)
Definition: The APN-AMBR limits the aggregate bit rate that can be expected to be provided across all Non GBR PDP
contexts of the same APN (e.g. excess traffic may get discarded by a rate shaping function). Each of those Non GBR
PDP contexts could potentially utilize the entire APN AMBR, e.g. when the other Non GBR PDP contexts do not carry
any traffic. GBR PDP contexts are outside the scope of APN AMBR. The GGSN enforces the APN AMBR in downlink.
Enforcement of APN AMBR in uplink may be done in the UE and additionally in the GGSN.
NOTE:
[Purpose:
All simultaneous active PDP contexts of a UE that are associated with the same APN need to be
connected to the same GGSN.
The APN-AMBR can be used for a differentiation of users regarding the bit rate they can
experience.]
UE Aggregated Maximum Bit-rate (kbps)

Definition: The UE AMBR limits the aggregate bit rate that can be expected to be provided across all Non GBR PDP
contexts of a UE (e.g. excess traffic may get discarded by a rate shaping function). Each of those Non GBR PDP
contexts could potentially utilize the entire UE AMBR, e.g. when the other Non GBR PDP contexts do not carry any
3GPP
Release 12
30
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
traffic. GBR (real-time) PDP contexts are outside the scope of UE AMBR. The RAN enforces the UE AMBR in uplink
and downlink.
[Purpose:
The UE AMBR can be used for limiting the overall bit rate a UE can experience.]
Void
QoS Attribute Mapping

NOTE:
This clause shall contain information of attribute mapping i.e. how attribute in different levels of QoS
(from external world and within UMTS network) shall be mapped. Current clause division is based on an
assumption that levels of QoS presented in clause 6, but they are open to discussions.
8.1 From Application Attributes to UMTS Bearer Service Attributes

NOTE:
This is an operator and/or implementation issue.
8.2 From UMTS Bearer Service Attributes to Radio Access Bearer

Service Attributes
When establishing a UMTS bearer and the underlying Radio Access Bearer for support of a service request, some
attribute on UMTS level does typically not have the same value as corresponding attribute on Radio Access
Bearer level. For example requested transfer delay for the UMTS bearer shall typically be larger that the
requested transfer delay for the Radio Access Bearer, as the transport through the core network will use a part of
the acceptable delay.
For the following attributes/settings the attribute value for the UMTS bearer will normally be the same as the
corresponding attribute value for the Radio Access Bearer:
-
maximum bitrate;
delivery order;
delivery of erroneous SDUs;
NOTE 1: If Delivery of erroneous SDUs is set to 'Yes' the handling of error indications on UMTS Bearer level and
Radio Access Bearer level differs. Error indications can only be provided on the MT/TE side of the
UMTS bearer. On the CN Gateway side error indications can not be signalled outside of UMTS network
in release 1999. Error indications can be provided on both end-points of the Radio Access Bearer.
-
guaranteed bit rate;
traffic handling priority;
maximum SDU size;
SDU format information.
NOTE 2: List of exact sizes of SDU's shall be the same, exact format of SDU payload does not exist on UMTS
Bearer level.
3GPP
Release 12
31
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
For the following attributes the attribute value for the UMTS bearer will normally not be the same as the
corresponding attribute value for the Radio Access Bearer. The relation between the attribute values for UMTS
Bearer service and Radio Access Bearer service is implementation dependent and depends for example on
network dimensioning.
-
Residual BER for Radio Access Bearer service shall be reduced with the bit errors introduced in the core
network, by Core Network Bearer service.
SDU error ratio for Radio Access Bearer service shall be reduced with the errors introduced in the core
network, by Core Network Bearer service.
Transfer delay for Radio Access Bearer service shall be reduced with the delay introduced in the core network,
e.g. on transmission links or in a codec resident in the Core Network.
For the following attribute the value range for the UMTS bearer is not the same as the corresponding attribute value
ranges for the Radio Access Bearer. The value for the Radio Access Bearer service attribute shall be derived
from the values of one or more UMTS bearer service attributes:
-
For PS services the Allocation/Retention Priority shall be derived from the UMTS bearer service attributes
Allocation/Retention Priority. Other attributes may be used in addition. For CS services the Allocation/Retention
Priority shall be derived from the eMLPP priority level attribute and/or the CS Allocation/Retention Priority
attribute and/or the Mobile Station Category attribute (TS 23.008 [8]) (which is only available for subscribers in
their home PLMN). Other attributes may be used in addition.
NOTE 3: The usage of other attributes can ensure that e.g. emergency calls would receive an appropriate RAB
Allocation/Retention Priority.
NOTE 4: To ensure backwards compatibility different values of an UMTS bearer service attribute can be mapped to
the same value of the RAB Allocation/Retention Priority attribute if necessary.
NOTE 5: From Release 9 onwards, the UMTS bearer service attribute Evolved Allocation/Retention Priority can be
mapped directly to the of the RAB Allocation/Retention Priority attribute.
The following attributes/settings only exist on the Radio Access Bearer level:
-
SDU format information - exact format of SDU payload is retrieved from the codec integrated in the core
network.
Source statistics descriptor is set to speech if the Radio Access Bearer transports compressed speech generated
by the codec integrated in the core network.
8.3 From UMTS Bearer Service Attributes to CN Bearer Service

Attributes
NOTE:
This is operator's choice.
Interworking
The model for the UMTS QoS classes and attributes may not be any existing network or QoS protocol/mechanisms as
such. The main goal of the specification is not to copy existing QoS mechanisms but rather to create a future proof
concept that will provide means to transport different types of data with different QoS requirements. Thus the
interworking of UMTS and existing network technologies has to be ensured. This clause presents the most common
technologies that UMTS shall be capable to interwork with.
9.1 UMTS-GSM CS/GPRS

9.1.1 UMTS-GSM CS
The mapping between UMTS-GSM CS is based on GSM CS mechanisms and CC parameters.
3GPP
Release 12
9.1.1.1
32
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Handover from UMTS to GSM
In case a UMTS call is set up in the CN, the BC IEs are mapped into QoS RAB attributes at call setup.
If the CN has to perform a handover towards GSM, the non-anchor MSC needs to perform an assignment based on
GSM specific traffic channel attributes.
As the BSSMAP protocol is used over the E-interface and as no appropriate procedure exists to map QoS attributes into
BSSMAP parameters, the anchor MSC shall map BC IEs into GSM traffic channel parameters, according to existing
GSM procedures for call setup.
This requires that the BC IE is coded according to GSM protocol requirements, i.e. all those parameters not applicable
to UMTS should nevertheless be correctly specified by the UE in order to perform a handover to GSM according the
above specified principles.
9.1.1.2
Handover from GSM to UMTS
In case a GSM call is set up in the CN, the BC IEs are mapped into channel type parameters at call setup.
If the CN has to perform a handover towards UMTS, the non-anchor MSC needs to perform an assignment based on
UMTS specific radio access bearer attributes.
As the BSSMAP protocol is used over the E-interface, the non-anchor MSC shall use the received Channel Type
parameter (e.g. 'speech or data indicator', the type of data service (transparent/non-transparent) and user rate) to derive
the QoS RAB attributes.
9.1.2 UMTS-GPRS
This section covers primarily the mapping of QoS attributes that are necessary across standardised interfaces. In
addition to these, there are cases when mapping of QoS attributes are needed internal to a node.
GPRS Release 99 (R99) QoS attributes shall be equivalent to the UMTS QoS Attributes. For interworking purposes
between different releases, mapping rules between GPRS Release 97/98 (R97/98) and GPRS Release 99 (R99) as well
as UMTS are defined. Mapping shall occur whenever the UE, the SGSN, the GGSN and the HLR nodes are of different
releases R97/98 or R99. The mapping is required in PDP context activation and modification procedures and when a
R99 HLR Insert Subscriber Data towards a R97/98 SGSN.
It is not within the scope of the present document to determine if any value combinations of attribute values can not be
supported. This means that complete mapping rules are defined here, and if the user requests a QoS profile which the
network is not able to support (e.g. a low delay and a high reliability), the decision if such a attribute combination can
be supported is left to admission control functionality within the PDP context activation procedure, and the QoS for
such a profile may be renegotiated by the network based on the available resources.
The overall principle for the mapping between two profiles is that the two profiles, applied in their respective network
releases, give the same or at least similar QoS. The GPRS R97/98 equipment will not be able to provide realtime
service corresponding to the R99 conversational and streaming traffic classes. Therefore, the mapping is always to the
non-realtime interactive and background traffic classes.
The R97/R98 QoS attributes are described in TS 03.60 Release 1998 [10].
9.1.2.1
General rules
Air interface Session Management and GTP messages of R99 shall contain the R99 attributes as an extension of the
R97/98 QoS Information Element thus unnecessary mapping can be avoided. When a R97/98 MS is visiting a GPRS
R99 or UMTS SGSN and the GGSN is of R97/98 or R99, the visited SGSN shall not perform any mapping of QoS
attributes. In case of GGSN R99, the GTP version 1 (R99) QoS profile only contains the R97/98 QoS attributes. It can
be noted that for this PDP Context a Traffic Flow Template (TFT) can not be requested.
When a R99 UE is visiting a GPRS R99 or UMTS SGSN (or serving PLMN) and the GGSN (or home PLMN) is of
R97/98, the visited SGSN (or visited PLMN) shall be capable of providing bearers having QoS support according to
R99. When a PDP Context is activated (mobile or network initiated) mapping takes place in the serving SGSN.
3GPP
Release 12
33
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
For MS initiated PDP Context Activations as well as network initiated PDP Context Activations, the home R97/98
GGSN will respond to the activation request by returning a the QoS Negotiated Profile, which contain the accepted and
changed R97/98 attributes. A mapping of the changed attributes into R99 attributes will be done in serving SGSN and
signalled to the UE in the Activate PDP Context Accept message.
It is a general mapping rule that returned and unchanged attributes during negotiation procedures shall not be mapped a
second time by serving SGSN, i.e. the unchanged R99 attributes received in the Create PDP Context Response message
will be sent to UE in QoS Negotiated Profile of the Activate PDP Context Accept message.
MAP message of R99 shall also contain the R99 attributes as an extension of the R97/98 QoS Information Element
when Insert Subscriber Data message is sent to a R99 SGSN. In the case when a R99 HLR send a Insert Subscriber
Data message to a R97/98 SGSN, the message shall contain the R97/98 QoS attributes. A R99 SGSN shall use the R99
attributes of subscribed QoS profile when a R99 UE requests to use subscription data in the PDP Context Activation.
The R99 SGSN shall use the R97/98 attributes of subscribed QoS profile when a R97/98 MS requests to use
subscription data in the PDP Context Activation.
9.1.2.2
Determining R99 attributes from R97/98 attributes
This mapping is applicable in the following cases:

-
hand over of PDP Context from GPRS R97/98 SGSN to GPRS R99 or UMTS SGSN;
PDP Context Activation in a serving R99 SGSN with a R97/98 GGSN. When GGSN respond to the PDP
Context Activation, mapping of the changed R97/98 QoS attributes received from the GGSN to R99 QoS
attributes is performed in the serving SGSN.
This mapping is also applicable if a R99 UE allows an application to request a PDP Context Activation with R97/98
QoS attributes, e.g. via AT command.
Table 6: Rules for determining R99 attributes from R97/98 attributes
Resulting R99 Attribute
Name
Value
Traffic class
Interactive
Background
1
2
3
SDU error ratio
10-6
10-4
10-3
10-5
4*10-3
Delivery of erroneous SDUs
'no'
'yes'
Maximum bitrate [kbps]
8
16
32
64
128
256
512
1024
2048
1
2
3
Delivery order
yes'
'no'
Maximum SDU size
Priority Level of Evolved
1 500 octets
1 to H
H+1 to M
M+1 to 15
Derived from R97/98 Attribute

Value
Name
1, 2, 3
Delay class
4
1
Delay class
2
3
2
Reliability class
3
4, 5
2, 3, 4
Reliability class
5
2, 3, 4
Reliability class
5
1
Peak throughput class
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
Precedence class
2
3
yes'
Reordering Required (Information
in the SGSN and the GGSN PDP
'no'
Contexts)
(Fixed value)
1
Precedence class
2
3
3GPP
Release 12
34
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
NOTE 1: As the allocation/retention priority attribute is not available in the UE (see 6.4.4.1) the mapping of the
allocation/retention priority attribute is not relevant for the UE.
NOTE 2: The values of H (high priority) and M (medium priority) can be set according to operator requirements to
ensure proper treatment of users with higher priority level information. The minimum value of H is 1. The
minimum value of M is H+1.
As the reordering required attribute is not available in the MS the MS should set the R99 delivery order attribute to the
value "no" for PDP Type = "IPv4" or "IPv6", otherwise the MS shall set the delivery order attribute to the value
"subscribed" (see TS 24.008 [6]).
9.1.2.3
Determining R97/98 attributes from R99 attributes
This mapping is applicable in the following cases:

-
PDP Context is handed over from GPRS R99 or UMTS to GPRS R97/98;
when a R99 UE perform a PDP Context Activation in a serving R99 SGSN while the GGSN is of R97/98. In this
case the SGSN shall perform mapping of the R99 QoS attributes to the R97/98 QoS attributes;
a R99 HLR may need to map the stored subscribed QoS attributes in the HLR subscriber data to R97/98 QoS
attributes that are going to be sent in the Insert Subscriber Data message from the R99 HLR to the R97/98 and
R99 SGSN. It is an implementation issue if the R97/98 QoS attributes are stored in the HLR in addition to the
R99 QoS attributes;
NOTE 1: UE handling for the case that a R99 UE (except UMTS only UE) receives a request for a PDP Context
Activation with R99 QoS attributes via AT command, is implementation dependent.
3GPP
Release 12
35
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Table 7: Rules for determining R97/98 attributes from R99 attributes

Resulting R97/98 Attribute
Name
Value
Delay class
1
1
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
Always set to 31
yes'
Derived from R99 Attribute

Value
Name
conversational
Traffic class
streaming
Traffic class
Interactive
Traffic class
1
Interactive
Traffic class
2
Interactive
Traffic class
3
Background
Traffic class
<= 10-5
SDU error ratio
(NOTE 4)
10-5 < x <= 5*10-4
SDU error ratio
> 5*10-4
SDU error ratio
<= 2*10-4
> 5*10-4
SDU error ratio
> 2*10-4
< 16
Maximum bitrate [kbps]
16 <= x < 32
32 <= x < 64
64 <= x < 128
128 <= x < 256
256 <= x < 512
512 <= x < 1024
1024 <= x < 2048
>= 2048
1
Allocation/retention priority
2
3
yes'
Delivery order
'no'
1
2
3
'no'
1
H+1
M+1
2
3
Reliability class
4
3
3
4
5
Peak throughput class
Precedence class
Mean throughput class

Reordering Required
(Information in the SGSN and
the GGSN PDP Contexts)
Precedence class
Priority Level of the Evolved

Allocation/retention priority
As the allocation/retention priority attribute is not available in the UE (see 6.4.4.1) the UE shall set the R97/98
precedence class attribute to the value "subscribed" (see TS 24.008 [6]).
NOTE 2: For asymmetric bearers, the higher value of the maximum bitrate attributes for downlink and uplink is
selected and used for the maximum bitrate value.
NOTE 3: The values of H (high priority) and M (medium priority) can be set according to operator requirements to
ensure proper treatment of users with higher priority level information. The minimum value of H is 1. The
minimum value of M is H+1.
NOTE 4: To avoid interoperability issues with LLC acknowledged mode the Reliability Class is set to "3" by the
network in case the SDU error ratio is "<= 10-5". The UE will receive both R97/98 and R99, or only
R97/98 (when UE is a pre-R99 UE) QoS attributes from the network of this release.
9.2 UMTS-PSTN
PSTN does not have QoS mechanisms thus QoS attribute interworking/mapping is not needed.
NOTE:
The details are to be solved by CN WG3.
3GPP
Release 12
36
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
9.3 UMTS-ISDN
ISDN does not have QoS mechanisms thus QoS attribute interworking/mapping is not needed. However, means for
determining required bandwidth, delay and reliability has to be developed. It is simple in MO cases but in MT cases the
mechanisms (or in worst case defaults) have to be developed.
NOTE:
The details are to be solved by CN WG3.
9.4 UMTS-Internet
In the case of Internet applications, the selection of the class and appropriate traffic attribute values is made according to
the Internet QoS attributes. Internet applications do not directly use the services of UMTS but they use Internet QoS
definitions and attributes, which are mapped to UMTS QoS attributes at API. Currently there are two main Internet QoS
concepts, namely Integrated Services and Differentiated Services. The mapping between Internet QoS and UMTS QoS
is presented in following clause.
IP based QoS models shall be supported for PDP contexts, meaning both Integrated Services (IntServ) signalled by
RSVP [RFC 2205] and Differentiated Services (6-bit QoS attribute on each IP packet, DiffServ). Both mechanisms are
controlled by applications residing in the TE, allowing different application specific QoS levels for the same PDP
context. The way application level QoS and UMTS level QoS interact is detailed in TS 23.207 [7].
3GPP
Release 12
37
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Annex A (informative):
Error resilience in real-time packet multimedia payloads
A.1
Introduction
This annex provides some basic information with respect to the error resilience of different encoded media streams
when considering the support of unequal error protection for real-time packet multimedia services. It provides some
indicative figures for the residual bit error rates that could be tolerated by audio-visual H.323 payloads in a 3G
environment.
H.323 employs the H.225.0 packetisation scheme, which in turn uses UDP/IP and RTP to transport each media stream.
The structure of an H.323 packet is shown in figure A.1.
Figure A.1: Structure of H.323 packet
Figure A.2: Structure of compressed H.323 packet.

Class 1 bits can tolerate medium BER; Class 2 bits can tolerate high BER
It is assumed that some elements of the H.323 header information, which comprises the IP, UDP and RTP headers, can
be compressed. It is also assumed that this information will require reliable transmission, such that any errors in the
header will result in the loss of the complete H.323 packet. However, for real-time multimedia streams that cannot
accommodate a large delay (and therefore packet retransmission), codecs can be used that are tolerant to residual bit
errors.
This annex highlights the error resilience of audio and visual codecs, and provide some example tolerance figures for
media streams of the type that are likely to comprise H.323 payloads.
A.1.1 Factors affecting error resilience

Specific error resilience figures will depend on a number of factors, including:
-
the media type;
the quality of service (QoS) required;
the specific codec used.
Media streams may also be sub-divided into different classes on the basis of bit error sensitivity as shown in figure A.2.
In some cases the most sensitive bits may be protected by in-band checksum information. It should also be noted that, in
addition to the effect of residual bit errors in the media stream, the QoS will be further degraded by packet loss due to
errors in the H.323 header.
A.2
Example figures
The following values are indicative of the QoS attributes required by audio and video media streams, including bit error
rates (BER) and frame erasure rates (FER).
3GPP
Release 12
38
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
For the purposes of example, figures are provided for the AMR speech codec and the MPEG-4 video codec.
AMR speech codec payload
Bit rate:
4,75 - 12,2 kbit/s
Delay:
end-to-end delay not to exceed 100ms (codec frame length is 20ms)
BER:
10-4 for Class 1 bits

10-3 for Class 2 bits
for some applications, a higher BER class (~10-2) might be feasible.

FER
< 0,5% (with graceful degradation for higher erasure rates)
MPEG-4 video payload:

Bit rate:
variable, average rate scalable from 24 to 128 kbit/s and higher
Delay:
end-to-end delay between 150 and 400ms

video codec delay is typically less than 200 ms
BER:
10-6 - no visible degradation

10-5 - little visible degradation
10-4 - some visible artefacts
> 10-3 - limited practical application
Packet loss rate FFS

Data and control:
Data (data refers to other types than audio and video e.g. file transfers, shared whiteboard) and control
information shall be transmitted reliably (i.e. residual bit errors should result in a lost packet).
3GPP
Release 12
39
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Annex B (normative):
Reference Algorithm for Conformance Definition of Bitrate
The annex shows a reference algorithm for the conformance definition of bitrate. This may be used for traffic contract
between UMTS bearers and external network/user equipment. It should be noted that the reference algorithm will never
imply a particular implementation for the traffic conditioner.
The algorithm is well known as "Token Bucket Algorithm" which has been described in IETF. Here, "tokens" represents
the allowed data volume, for example in byte. "Tokens" are given at a constant "token rate" by a traffic contract, are
stored temporarily in a "token bucket", and are consumed by accepting the packet. This algorithm uses the following
two parameters (r and b) for the traffic contract and one variable (TBC) for the internal usage.
-
r: token rate, (corresponds to the monitored Maximum bitrate/Guaranteed bitrate).
b: bucket size, (the upper bound of TBC, corresponds to bounded burst size).
TBC(Token bucket counter): the number of given/remained tokens at any time.
In words, conformance according to a token bucket can be defined as: "Data is conformant if the amount of data
submitted during any arbitrarily chosen time period T does not exceed (b+rT)".
The algorithm is described in the following.
Token bucket counter (TBC) is usually increased by "r" in each small time unit. However, TBC has upper bound "b"
and the value of TBC shall never exceed "b".
When a packet #i with length Li arrives, the receiver checks the current TBC. If the TBC value is equal to or larger than
Li, the packet arrival is judged compliant, i.e., the traffic is conformant. At this moment tokens corresponding to the
packet length is consumed, and TBC value decreases by Li.
When a packet #j with length Lj arrives, if TBC is less than Lj, the packet arrival is non-compliant, i.e., the traffic is not
conformant. In this case, the value of TBC is not updated.
Figure B.1: Operation example of the reference conformance algorithm
3GPP
Release 12
40
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Annex C (normative):
Determine which QoS profile is of highest QoS
In handovers from Release 1999 to GPRS Release 97/98 networks, it will be necessary to determine which PDP context
of a set of PDP contexts provides the highest QoS, since, of a set of PDP contexts with the same APN and PDP address,
all PDP contexts except the one with the highest QoS profile will be deactivated.
To determine which PDP context that has the highest QoS table C.1 is used. Only the PDP context(s) with the highest
QoS ranking will be maintained and the rest will be deactivated. In a second step, if more than one PDP context remain,
the PDP context with the highest value for the maximum bitrate attributes for downlink or uplink is selected. All PDP
contexts except the PDP context(s) with the highest Maximum bitrate selected will be deactivated.
If more than one PDP context remain after the second step, all PDP contexts except that with the lowest NSAPI are
deactivated.
Table C.1
QoS ranking
1
2
3
4
5
6
Traffic class
Interactive
conversational
streaming
Interactive
Interactive
Background
3GPP

1
Not applicable
Not applicable
2
3
Not applicable
Release 12
41
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Annex D (normative):
Determine Traffic Class weights in HLR QoS profile
The QoS profile in the subscription record represents the maximum QoS per PDP context to the associated APN.
Subsequently, it shall be possible to negotiate all QoS parameters, including an appropriate Traffic Class for each QoS
flow. This is valid for the first PDP context that is established as well as subsequent PDP contexts, i.e. this includes
primary and secondary PDP contexts activations. The traffic classes have increasing weight according to the order
background, interactive, streaming and conversational.
3GPP
Release 12
42
3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)
Annex E (informative):
Change history
Change history
Date
12/2003
03/2004
03/2004
03/2004
12/2004
06/2005
06/2005
03/2006
06/2007
09/2007
12/2008
12/2009
06/2010
2011-03
2011-06
2011-12
2012-06
2014-09
TSG #
SP-22
SP-23
SP-23
SP-23
SP-26
SP-28
SP-28
SP-31
SP-36
SP-37
SP-42
SP-46
SP-48
SP-51
SP-52
SP-54
SP-56
SP-65
TSG Doc.
SP-030654
SP-040033
SP-040033
SP-040033
SP-040912
SP-050334
SP-050334
SP-060138
SP-070539
SP-100327
SP-110322
SP-110729
SP-120250
-
CR
0145
0149
0150
0151
0153
0154
0156
0159
0164
0165
0168
0171
0172
-
Rev
2
2
1
3
2
1
1
3
1
1
2
-
Cat
F
A
F
F
A
F
F
F
F
F
A
A
F
-
Subject/Comment
Radio Access Bearer Service Attributes for GERAN
Correction to the use of delivery order set to yes
ARP Clarification
Removal of reliability class 1
Clarification on delivery order set to no
RAB Allocation/Retention Priority
Addition of GERAN to the scope section
Peak throughput class reference
Update to Rel-7 version (MCC)
Support of higher maximum bitrate and guaranteed bit rate
Addition of new QoS parameters evolved ARP and APN-AMBR
Clarification of SRVCC usage of QoS
QoS mapping
MBR and GBR values to support 8C-HSDPA
3GPP
Old
5.10.0
6.0.0
6.0.0
6.0.0
6.1.0
6.2.0
6.2.0
6.3.0
6.4.0
7.0.0
7.1.0
8.0.0
9.0.0
9.1.0
10.0.0
10.1.0
10.2.0
11.0.0
New
6.0.0
6.1.0
6.1.0
6.1.0
6.2.0
6.3.0
6.3.0
6.4.0
7.0.0
7.1.0
8.0.0
9.0.0
9.1.0
10.0.0
10.1.0
10.2.0
11.0.0
12.0.0

3GPP TS 23.107

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

3GPP TS 23.107

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

3GPP TS 23.107

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

3rd Generation Partnership Project;

Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects;

3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)

3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)

High Level Requirements.......................................................................................................................

End User QoS Requirements...............................................................................................................................

CS QoS in release 1999..........................................................................................................................

Overview of Different Levels of QoS.................................................................................................................

QoS Attribute Mapping........................................................................................................................

From Application Attributes to UMTS Bearer Service Attributes.....................................................................

3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)

Error resilience in real-time packet multimedia payloads.........................

Reference Algorithm for Conformance Definition of Bitrate....................

Determine which QoS profile is of highest QoS..........................................

Determine Traffic Class weights in HLR QoS profile................................

3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)

3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)

3GPP TS 23.110: "UMTS Access Stratum - Services and Functions".

3GPP TS 22.100: "UMTS Phase 1".

3GPP TS 23.121: "Architectural Requirements for Release 1999".

3GPP TS 22.105: "Services & Service capabilities".

3GPP TS 23.207: "End-to-end QoS concept and architecture".

3GPP TS 23.008: "Organization of subscriber data".

3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)

Frequency Division Duplex

High Level Requirements

4.1 End User QoS Requirements

only the QoS perceived by end-user matter;

the number of user defined/controlled attributes has to be as small as possible;

derivation/definition of QoS attributes from the application requirements has to be simple;

QoS definitions have to be future proof;

3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)

QoS has to be provided end-to-end.

4.2 General Requirements for QoS

All attributes have to have unambiguous meaning.

QoS mechanism have to allow efficient use of radio capacity.

Allow independent evolution of Core and Access networks.

All attribute combinations have to have unambiguous meaning.

4.3 Technical Requirements for QoS

the UMTS shall provide a finite set of QoS definitions;

QoS shall support efficient resource utilisation;

the QoS attributes are needed to support asymmetric bearers;

3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)

CS QoS in release 1999

6.1 Overview of Different Levels of QoS

3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)

UMTS Bearer Service

Radio Access Bearer Service

Figure 1: UMTS QoS Architecture

6.1.1 The End-to-End Service and UMTS Bearer Service

3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)

6.1.4 The Backbone Network Service

6.2 QoS Management Functions in the Network

3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)

6.2.1 Description of functions

Functions for UMTS bearer service in the user plane

6.2.2 Allocation of QoS management functions

3GPP TS 23.107 V12.0.0 (2014-09)

service primitive interface