Pennebaker v. Pfizer, Inc., - Document No. 2
Pennebaker v. Pfizer, Inc., - Document No. 2
Pennebaker v. Pfizer, Inc., - Document No. 2
2
Case
CaseM:05-cv-01699-CRB
3:06-cv-00131-CRB Document
Document110
2 Filed01/10/2006
Filed 12/13/2005 Page
Page11ofof11
11
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
IN RE: BEXTRA AND CELEBREX CASE NO. M:05-CV-01699-CRB
11 MARKETING SALES PRACTICES
12 AND PRODUCT LIABILITY MDL No. 1699
LITIGATION
13
17
I. SCOPE OF ORDER
18
1. This Order shall govern the practice and procedure in those actions
19
transferred to this Court by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“the Panel”)
20
pursuant to its Transfer Orders of September 6, 2005, any “tag-along” actions transferred
21
to this Court by the Panel pursuant to the Panel’s Rules of Procedure, and all related
22
actions that have been or will be originally filed in, transferred to, or removed to this
23
Court and assigned thereto.
24
2. This Order and all subsequent Case Management Orders shall be binding
25
on all parties and their counsel in all cases currently pending or subsequently transferred
26
to In Re: Bextra and Celebrex Marketing, Sales Practices and Product Liability
27
Litigation, MDL No. 1699 and shall govern each case in the proceedings unless they
28
explicitly state that they relate to specific cases.
-1-
Dockets.Justia.com
Case
CaseM:05-cv-01699-CRB
3:06-cv-00131-CRB Document
Document110
2 Filed01/10/2006
Filed 12/13/2005 Page
Page22ofof11
11
2 3. The Court will be guided by the Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth
3 (“MCL 4th”) (2004 ed.), as well as by the Civil Local Rules of Court for the United
4 States District Court for the Northern District of California (“the Civil Local Rules”).
5 Counsel are directed to familiarize themselves with the MCL 4th, this Order, and the
8 Sales Practices and Product Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1699, whether such action
9 was or will be filed originally or directly in the United States District Court for the
10 Northern District of California or was or will be transferred or removed from some other
11 court, shall not constitute a determination by this Court that jurisdiction or venue is
12 proper in this District. No reference in this Order to actions filed originally or directly in
13 the United States District Court for the Northern District of California shall constitute a
14 waiver of any defendant’s contention that jurisdiction or venue is improper and/or that
17 5. The Court requests the assistance of all counsel in calling to the attention
18 of the Clerk of this Court the filing, removal, or transfer of any case of which they
19 become aware which might properly be consolidated with In Re: Bextra and Celebrex
20 Marketing, Sales Practices and Product Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1699. To that
21 end, prior to each Status Conference or upon request of the Court, Plaintiffs’ Liaison
22 Counsel and Defendants’ Liaison Counsel shall jointly update the master case list.
24 6. Until further Order of this Court, the parties shall serve all papers that are
25 not to be filed with the Court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(d), including
26 but not limited to disclosures under Rule 26, deposition notices, interrogatories, requests
27 for documents, requests for admission, responses thereto, and certificates of service
-2-
Case
CaseM:05-cv-01699-CRB
3:06-cv-00131-CRB Document
Document110
2 Filed01/10/2006
Filed 12/13/2005 Page
Page33ofof11
11
1 Counsel. Where a paper is applicable to all cases, substantially all cases, a category of
3 subsequent Orders, Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel shall also electronically serve such paper
4 on counsel of record for individual plaintiff(s) to whom the paper is applicable. Where a
6 Counsel shall electronically serve such paper on the counsel of record for the individual
7 plaintiff(s) in that case as well as Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel. The parties shall further
8 meet and confer to identify an electronic method for serving and archiving papers that
9 are not to be filed with the Court, such as the service offered by Lexis-Nexis, which shall
12 Upjohn Co., Pharmacia & Upjohn Co., LLC, Pharmacia Corp., G.D. Searle & Co.,
13 and/or G.D. Searle, LLC in any case prior to the transfer of such case to this Court (or
14 who appear on behalf of such defendants in cases that are later transferred to this Court
15 prior to such transfer) are hereby relieved from the obligation to register for Electronic
17 Counsel shall distribute any papers filed in these proceedings to such counsel as she
20 motions, Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel and Defendants’ Liaison Counsel shall meet and
21 confer on dates available to counsel. Once they have agreed to several dates, Liaison
22 Counsel for the moving party shall call the Court’s Deputy Clerk, Barbara Espinoza, to
25 Counsel and Defendants’ Liaison Counsel or ordered by the Court for a specific motion,
26 all motions, other than dispositive motions, shall be filed not less than thirty-five (35)
27 calendar days before the hearing date. Responses to all contested motions, other than
28 dispositive motions, shall be filed not less than twenty-one (21) calendar days before the
-3-
Case
CaseM:05-cv-01699-CRB
3:06-cv-00131-CRB Document
Document110
2 Filed01/10/2006
Filed 12/13/2005 Page
Page44ofof11
11
1 hearing date. A reply to a response to any motion shall be filed not less than fourteen
2 (14) calendar days before the hearing date. These times may be extended by stipulation
3 and/or by order of the Court, on a reasonable basis. The briefing schedule for any
5 10. All parties shall have an ongoing obligation to meet and confer with
6 Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel, Defendants’ Liaison Counsel, and any other party to whom a
8 issues before bringing them to the Court. The moving party shall have an obligation to
9 certify in the moving papers that such meet and confer took place and identify which
11 brought by any party except in accordance with the provisions of this section, unless
18 12. This Court will convene periodic Status Conferences on the request of
19 Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel and Defendants’ Liaison Counsel or on its own motion, with
20 Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel to give notice of such scheduled Status Conferences to the
21 Master Service List. In order to aid the Court and the parties in preparing for future
22 conferences, Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel and Defendants’ Liaison Counsel shall confer at
23 least ten calendar days prior to each future status conference to attempt to agree upon a
24 proposed agenda for the conference. The parties shall submit a joint agenda to the extent
25 they agree, and separate agendas for items on which they do not agree, not less than three
26 court days prior to the conference. The agendas are intended to aid the Court in
27 informing itself of the items or issues which the parties desire to raise at the Status
28 Conference, and the Court may amend or augment the agendas as it deems appropriate.
-4-
Case
CaseM:05-cv-01699-CRB
3:06-cv-00131-CRB Document
Document110
2 Filed01/10/2006
Filed 12/13/2005 Page
Page55ofof11
11
3 13. To act on behalf of plaintiffs with the responsibilities described below, the
4 Court initially designates the following counsel to serve as the Plaintiffs’ Steering
6 Burg, Thomas P. Cartmell, Michael A. Galpern, Carlene Rhodes Lewis, Tina Bailer
8 and Paul Sizemore. These PSC members reflect the array of actions that the Panel has
9 transferred to this Court, and include representatives of plaintiffs with products liability
10 claims and purchase claims. This Court may amend or expand the PSC upon request
15 15. The PSC is chaired by Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel who is vested by the
16 Court with the authority and duty to coordinate and oversee the responsibilities of the
17 PSC set forth below; to schedule PSC meetings and keep minutes or transcripts of these
19 and file pleadings relating to all actions; and to bind the PSC in scheduling depositions,
20 setting agendas, entering into stipulations, and in other necessary interactions with
21 defense counsel. She shall perform other necessary administrative and logistic functions
22 of the PSC and carry out any other duty as the Court may order.
23 16. The Liaison Counsel, Trial Counsel, and PSC designations are of a
24 personal nature. Accordingly, this Court looks to these counsel to undertake personal
25 responsibility to perform the designated functions and reserves the discretion to replace
26 them, on their own request or this Court’s own motion, should they become unable to do
27 so.
28 17. In addition to the duties described elsewhere in this Order and in Pretrial
-5-
Case
CaseM:05-cv-01699-CRB
3:06-cv-00131-CRB Document
Document110
2 Filed01/10/2006
Filed 12/13/2005 Page
Page66ofof11
11
1 Order No. 1, Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel shall have the following duties and
2 responsibilities.
4 transcripts, and all documents served upon plaintiffs’ counsel, and make such papers
7 disbursements advanced by members of the PSC and received by the PSC and report in
12 Practices and Product Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1699, to the fullest extent
14 e. Coordinate and consult with plaintiffs’ counsel in state court to ensure that
15 plaintiffs in both federal and state court have access to a common document depository.
20 18. Trial counsel shall organize and coordinate the work of the attorneys on the
21 trial team.
22 C. PSC Committees
23 19. The PSC is given the responsibility to create such committees and
24 subcommittees of the PSC as are necessary to efficiently carry out its responsibilities, to
26 selected counsel (including non-members of the PSC), as may be required for the
27 common benefit of plaintiffs. All attorneys carrying out such common benefit work who
28 may look to any common fund or agreement for reimbursement or compensation shall
-6-
Case
CaseM:05-cv-01699-CRB
3:06-cv-00131-CRB Document
Document110
2 Filed01/10/2006
Filed 12/13/2005 Page
Page77ofof11
11
1 maintain and submit time and expense records, as this Court shall specify in a subsequent
2 Order. All such reimbursement and compensation shall be subject to this Court’s
4 or subcommittee created by the PSC, and the Court does not need to approve the
6 20. The Panel’s September 6, 2005 Transfer Order transfers to this Court
7 actions asserting wrongful death and personal injury claims which the Panel described as
8 “products liability actions,” as well as actions seeking economic damages arising from
9 the purchase of Bextra and/or Celebrex, which the Panel described as “marketing/sales
10 practices actions.”
11 21. Some of the actions transferred (or to be transferred) to this Court for
12 coordinated treatment under Paragraph 1 of this Order are proposed class actions on
13 behalf of “third party payors” (such as health and welfare funds, self-insured employers,
14 and private for-profit and not-for-profit insurers), and/or on behalf of cash paying or co-
15 paying consumers of Bextra and/or Celebrex. The third party payors and consumers are
18 death and personal injury claims (“product liability claims”) also included in these
19 proceedings. Purchase claims allege violations of law in connection with the sales and
20 marketing of Bextra and/or Celebrex and seek to recover, among other things, all or a
21 portion of the purchase price paid for Bextra and/or Celebrex during the class periods
23 22. The PSC may create a Purchase Claims Committee, and designate certain
24 members as Chair and as Vice-Chairs. The Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel may designate
26 scheduling, and conducting party and third party document and deposition discovery that
27 pertains to purchase claims, and for pleadings, briefs and arguments on merits, class, and
28 discovery-related motions and matters that pertain to purchase claims; however, the
-7-
Case
CaseM:05-cv-01699-CRB
3:06-cv-00131-CRB Document
Document110
2 Filed01/10/2006
Filed 12/13/2005 Page
Page88ofof11
11
1 Court will consider Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel as the counsel having ultimate
3 23. It is intended and expected by this Order that, as to all matters common to
4 the coordinated cases, and to the fullest extent consistent with the independent fiduciary
5 obligations owed by any and all putative class counsel to the proposed classes or
6 subclasses they represent, that pretrial proceedings shall be conducted by and through the
7 PSC.
10 below, the Court appoints Amy W. Schulman to serve as Defendants’ Liaison Counsel.
11 The Court may amend or expand the Defendants’ Liaison Counsel upon request from
13 25. Defendants’ Liaison Counsel is vested by the Court with the authority and
16 and file pleadings relating to all actions; and to bind defendants in scheduling
18 interactions with plaintiffs’ counsel. Defendants’ Liaison Counsel shall perform other
19 necessary administrative and logistic functions and carry out any other duty as the Court
20 may order.
22 committees and subcommittees of defendants as are necessary to efficiently carry out her
26 reserves the discretion to replace counsel, on her own request or this Court’s own
-8-
Case
CaseM:05-cv-01699-CRB
3:06-cv-00131-CRB Document
Document110
2 Filed01/10/2006
Filed 12/13/2005 Page
Page99ofof11
11
1 a. Discovery
3 defendants in In Re: Bextra and Celebrex Marketing Sales Practices and Product
4 Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1699, in coordination with any consolidated or coordinated
6 (2) Develop and propose to the Court schedules for the commencement,
9 discovery requests, motions, and subpoenas pertaining to any witnesses and documents
10 needed to properly prepare for the pretrial of relevant issues found in the pleadings of
13 assist him or her in the preparation of the pretrial stages of his or her client’s particular
14 claims.
15 (4) Coordinate discovery, to the extent necessary, with MDL No. 1657,
16 In Re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation, pursuant to the Panel’s September 13, 2005
17 Order.
18 (5) Coordinate discovery to the fullest extent possible with related state
19 court actions.
23 Initiate proposals, suggestions, schedules, or joint briefs, and any other appropriate
26 defendants.
28 response to any inquiries by the Court, subject to the right of any defendant’s counsel to
-9-
Case
CaseM:05-cv-01699-CRB
3:06-cv-00131-CRB Document
Document110
2 Filed01/10/2006
Filed 12/13/2005 Page
Page10
10ofof11
11
2 c. Miscellaneous
3 (1) Submit and argue any verbal or written motions presented to the
4 Court on behalf of defendants as well as oppose when necessary any motions submitted
5 by plaintiffs or other parties which involve matters within the sphere of the
7 (2) Negotiate and enter into stipulations with plaintiffs regarding this
8 litigation.
14 29. Prior to the next Status Conference, Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel and
15 Defendants’ Liaison Counsel shall meet and confer on the following topics:
23 30. Three days prior to the Status Conference, Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel and
24 Defendants’ Liaison Counsel shall submit to the Court a proposed Pretrial Order No. 3
25 that includes proposals with respect to the above topics, together with any other
27 31. Three days prior to the Status Conference, Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel shall
28 also submit a proposal for maintaining time records of plaintiffs’ counsel. The proposal
- 10 -
Case
CaseM:05-cv-01699-CRB
3:06-cv-00131-CRB Document
Document110
2 Filed01/10/2006
Filed 12/13/2005 Page
Page11
11ofof11
11
2 32. The next Status Conference is scheduled for January 27, 2006 at 10:00
3 a.m. Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel shall work with the Court’s Deputy Clerk, Barbara
4 Espinoza, on setting up a telephone “call in” number so that counsel may monitor the
5 Status Conference by telephone; however, any counsel who wishes to speak at the Status
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 Dated: December 13, 2005
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 11 -