Seminar Report
Seminar Report
Seminar Report
2013-2014
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
There are numerous industrial applications that require higher power apparatus in recent years.
Some medium voltage motor drives and utility applications require medium voltage and
megawatt power level. For a medium voltage grid, it is troublesome to connect only one power
semiconductor switch directly. As a result, a multilevel power inverter structure has been
introduced as an alternative in high power and medium voltage situations. A multilevel inverter
not only achieves high power ratings, but also enables the use of renewable energy sources.
Renewable energy sources such as photovoltaic and fuel cells can be easily interfaced to a
multilevel inverter system for a high power application.
The concept of multilevel inverters was introduced in 1975. The term multilevel began with the
three-level inverter. Subsequently, several multilevel inverter topologies have been developed.
The elementary concept of a multilevel inverter to achieve higher power is to use a series of
power semiconductor switches with several lower voltage dc sources to perform the power
conversion by synthesizing a staircase voltage waveform. A multilevel inverter generates a
multistep staircase voltage waveform approaching a pure sinusoidal output voltage by increasing
the number of levels. Capacitors, batteries, and renewable energy voltage sources can be used as
the multiple dc voltage sources.
Unfortunately, multilevel inverters do have some disadvantages. One particular disadvantage is
the greater number of power semiconductor switches needed. Although lower voltage rated
switches can be utilized in a multilevel inverter, each switch requires a gate drive circuit. This
may cause the overall system to be more expensive and complex.
Many multilevel inverter applications focus on industrial medium-voltage motor drives, utility
interface for renewable energy systems, flexible AC transmission system (FACTS), and traction
drive systems.
2013-2014
CHAPTER 2
MULTILEVEL INVERTERS
The voltage source inverters produce an output voltage or a current with levels either 0 or Vdc.
They are known as the two-level inverter. To obtain a quality output voltage or a current
waveform with a minimum amount of ripple content, they require high switching frequency
along with various pulse width modulation (PWM) strategies. In high power and high voltage
applications, these two-level inverters have some limitations in operating at high frequency
mainly due to switching losses and constraints of device ratings.
The multilevel inverters have drawn tremendous interest in the power industry. They present a
new set of features that are well suited for use in reactive power compensation. It may be easier
to produce a high power, high-voltage inverter with the multilevel structure because of the way
in which device voltage stresses are controlled in the structure. Increasing the number of voltage
levels in the inverter without requiring higher ratings on individual devices can increase the
power rating. The unique structure of multilevel voltage source inverters allows them to reach
high voltage with low harmonics without the use of transformers or series connected
synchronized switching devices. As the number of voltage levels increases, the harmonic content
of the output voltage waveform decreases significantly.
2013-2014
2013-2014
2. These inverters provide switch combination redundancy for balancing different voltage
levels.
3. Like the diode-clamp inverter with more levels, the harmonic content is low enough to
avoid the need for filters.
Disadvantages:
1. An excessive number of storage capacitors are required when the number of levels is
high. High level inverters are more difficult to pack with the bulky power capacitors and
are expensive too.
2. The inverter control can be very complicated, and the switching frequency and switching
losses are high.
2.1.3 Cascaded multilevel inverter
A cascaded multilevel inverter consists of a series of H-Bridge inverter units. Output
voltage of this inverter is the sum of each H-bridge outputs and it is almost sinusoidal.
Advantages
1. To achieve the same number of voltage levels, this type of inverter requires the least
number of components.
2. Unlike diode-clamped and flying capacitor multilevel inverters, no extra clamping diodes
or voltage balancing capacitors are needed.
3. Smaller dc sources are usually involved, resulting in fewer safety issues.
Disadvantages
1. Separate dc sources are required, resulting in limited applicability.
2. For a three-phase system, this type of inverter will require more switches than a more
traditional inverter.
2013-2014
CHAPTER 3
2013-2014
SWITCH S1
VOLTAGE
Vs
-Vs
1
0
SWITCH S2
SWITCH S3
0
0
1
1
Table 3.1 Switching states of an H-bridge inverter
SWITCH S4
1
0
2013-2014
To synthesize a multilevel waveform, the ac outputs of each of the different level H-bridge cells
are connected in series. The synthesized voltage waveform is therefore, the sum of the inverter
outputs.
FEATURES OF CASCADED MULTILEVEL INVERTER
(1) It is much more suitable to high-voltage, high-power applications than the conventional
inverters.
(2) It switches each device only once per line cycle and generates a multistep staircase voltage
waveform approaching a pure sinusoidal output voltage by increasing the number of levels.
(3) The structure consists of a cascaded connection of many single-phase full-bridge inverter
units and each bridge is fed with a separate DC source.
2013-2014
Output
Switch
Switch
voltage
Vs
2Vs
-Vs
-2Vs
S1
1
1
0
0
S2
S3
S4
S1
S2
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Table 3.2: Switching states of a 5 level inverter
Switch
Switch
Switch
Switch
Switch
Switch
S3
1
0
0
1
S4
0
0
1
1
2013-2014
2013-2014
2013-2014
2013-2014
Ideally, given a desired fundamental voltage V1, we determine the switching angles 1, 2 and
3 so that the above equation becomes V (t) = V1 sin (t). For three-phase systems, the triplen
harmonics in each phase need not be cancelled as they automatically cancel in the line-to-line
voltages. In this case where there are 3 DC sources, the desire is to cancel the 5th and 7th order
harmonics as they tend to dominate the total harmonic distortion. Therefore the mathematical
statement of these conditions is
This is a system of three transcendental equations in the three unknown values of 1, 2, and 3.
There are many ways to solve for these angles.
2013-2014
CHAPTER 4
CONCLUSION
Multilevel concept provides an efficient reduction of harmonic distortion. The benefits of
multilevel inverter include lower-order harmonics cancellation, lower transient power loss due to
low-frequency switching. This paper proposes a 5 level cascaded multilevel inverter with a
single DC source. Suitable capacitor is used as a DC source for the second H-bridge. It is
expected that the proposed multilevel inverter topology can be applied to solar photovoltaic and
energy storage (with multiple battery cells) applications. Subject to specified constraints, the
voltage level of the capacitors can be controlled while at the same time choosing the switching
angles to achieve a specified modulation index and eliminate harmonics in the output waveform.
Future work will be towards PWM voltage control and harmonics minimization.
2013-2014
REFERENCES
[1]M. Klabunde, Y. Zhao and T. A. Lipo, Current control of a 3 level rectifier/inverter drive
system, in Conference Record 1994 IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, 1994, pp. 23482356.
[2] G. Sinha and T. A. Lipo, A four level rectifier-inverter system for drive applications, in
Conference Record IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, October 1996, pp. 980987.
[3] J. K. Steinke, Control strategy for a three phase AC traction drive with three level GTO
PWM inverter, in IEEE Power Electronic Specialist Conference (PESC), 1988, pp. 431438.
[4] J. Zhang, High performance control of a three level IGBT inverter fed AC drive, in Conf.
Rec. IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, 1995, pp. 2228.
[5] M. Manjrekar P. K. Steimer and T. Lipo, Hybrid multilevel power conversion system: A
competitive solution for high-power applications, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications,
vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 834841, May/June 2000.