Models
Models
Models
There are a good number of models that have been postulated by various
scholars to describe the HRM concept.
However, as shall be seen these various models either fall under the soft or the
hard approach of HRM.
Cultural Forces
Business
Strategy
Organizationa
l Structure
HR
Strategy
Devanna (1984)
The point of departure in the Michigan Model is the pre-eminence and predominance of a business strategy, which must strictly be achieved by the
available resources regardless of whether, they are able to do so or not.
In fact the business strategy must be achieved through minimum labour costs
enhanced by structural re-organization, Performance Related Pay and staff
reduction.
This model is a fusion of aspects that resemble both a hard and a soft
approach of HRM.
1.
This is the ability of organizations to maintain a fit between the HRM strategy
and the business strategy. In other words, there must be congruence between
business strategy and the HR strategy for the organization to achieve its goals.
This is precisely because human resources are treated in a similar manner like
any other resource with the prime goal of achieving business objectives.
2. Flexibility
Flexibility is basically concerned with the ability of the organization and its
people to adapt to the changing business and work environment and to the
capacity to manage innovation.
Hard HRM for example can be seen through numeric flexibility where
employees are employed only when their production is required and when
their labour is not required they are discharged.
Flexibility can also show the soft side of HRM through the same example
given above.
Flexibility in this case is not only concerned with the need to achieve business
objectives but also the need to treat its employees as fairly as possible.
3. High Commitment
This is concerned with the need to have both behavioural commitment, which
is the ability to go an extra mile, and attitudinal commitment, which is
reflected through a strong identification with the organization.
4. Quality
Quality is based on the assumption that provision of high quality goods and services
results from a quality way of managing people.
Organizational Effectiveness
Strategic Integration
High Commitment
Quality
Flexibility
Tutorial
Using David Guest (1987)s Model and John Storey (1989)s model of HRM: Critically
demonstrate your understanding of Hard and Soft HRM.
Model by John Sorey (1989)
John Storey emerged to be one of the strongest proponents of HRM as a completely
different discipline from the preceding disciplines embraced by the TPM approach.
Because of these ideological and philosophical aspects, HRM does not only
stand distinctively outstanding from TPM but also emerges to be a much more
humane approach to employment management.
1.
The model is premised on the notion that HRM is based on a set of beliefs and
assumptions, which makes it a distinctive approach.
Fundamentally it is believed that it is the human resource among all the other
factors of production, which gives the difference.
2.
Strategic Qualities
HRM is further distinguished by the fact that it is strategic in nature and
therefore requires the attention of senior management and top executives.
The above-mentioned assumption stems from the 1st belief that the human
resource is the most important source of competitive advantage.
3.
It is clear from the HRM philosophy that people management is too important
to be left to operational personnel specialists.
4.
Key Levers