7 Environmental Problems That Are Worse Than We Thought
7 Environmental Problems That Are Worse Than We Thought
7 Environmental Problems That Are Worse Than We Thought
Than We Thought
by Stephanie Rogers View Comments
With as much attention as the environment has been getting lately, youd think that wed be
further along in our fight to preserve the worlds species, resources and the beautiful diversity
of nature. Unfortunately, things arent nearly that rosy. In fact, many of the environmental
problems that have received the most public attention are even worse than we thought from
destruction in the rain forest to melting glaciers in the Arctic. Weve got a lot of work to do.
7. Mammal Extinction
Environmental Issues
by Anup Shah
To print all information e.g. expanded side notes, shows alternative links,
use the print version:
o
http://www.globalissues.org/print/issue/168
This part of the global issues web site attempts to highlight some of the environmental issues
and concerns that have an affect on all of us from what we do, to what we dont do.
45 articles on Environmental Issues and 7 related issues:
Biodiversity
Last updated Thursday, November 10, 2011.
Coral Reefs
Last updated Sunday, January 16, 2011.
One type of ecosystem that perhaps is neglected more than any other is
perhaps also the richest in biodiversitythe coral reefs.
Coral reefs are useful to the environment and to people in a number of ways. However, all
around the world, much of the worlds marine biodiversity face threats from human and
activities as well as natural. It is feared that very soon, many reefs could die off.
Read Coral Reefs to learn more.
A Biosafety Protocol meeting was hosted in Montreal, Canada January 24 to January 28.
Compared to the fiasco of the previous year, this time, there had been a somewhat successful
treaty to regulate the international transport and release of genetically modified organisms to
protect natural biological diversity. However, there were a number of important and serious
weaknesses too.
Read Biosafety Protocol 2000 to learn more.
The climate is changing. The earth is warming up, and there is now
overwhelming scientific consensus that it is happening, and human-induced. With global
warming on the increase and species and their habitats on the decrease, chances for
ecosystems to adapt naturally are diminishing. Many are agreed that climate change may be
one of the greatest threats facing the planet. Recent years show increasing temperatures in
various regions, and/or increasing extremities in weather patterns.
This section explores some of the effects of climate change. It also attempts to provide
insights into what governments, companies, international institutions, and other organizations
are attempting to do about this issue, as well as the challenges they face. Some of the major
conferences in recent years are also discussed.
Read Climate Change and Global Warming to learn more.
The climate is changing. The earth is warming up, and there is now
overwhelming scientific consensus that it is happening, and human-induced. With global
warming on the increase and species and their habitats on the decrease, chances for
ecosystems to adapt naturally are diminishing.
Many are agreed that climate change may be one of the greatest threats facing the planet.
Recent years show increasing temperatures in various regions, and/or increasing extremities
in weather patterns.
This section looks at what causes climate change, what the impacts are and where scientific
consensus currently is.
Read Climate Change and Global Warming Introduction to learn more.
Global Dimming
Posted Saturday, January 15, 2005.
Research has shown that air pollutants from fossil fuel use make clouds reflect more of the
suns rays back into space. This leads to an effect known as global dimming whereby less
heat and energy reaches the earth. At first, it sounds like an ironic savior to climate change
problems. However, it is believed that global dimming caused the droughts in Ethiopia in the
1970s and 80s where millions died, because the northern hemisphere oceans were not warm
enough to allow rain formation. Global dimming is also hiding the true power of global
warming. By cleaning up global dimming-causing pollutants without tackling greenhouse gas
emissions, rapid warming has been observed, and various human health and ecological
disasters have resulted, as witnessed during the European heat wave in 2003, which saw
thousands of people die.
Read Global Dimming to learn more.
The United States plus a few other countries, and many large corporations, have opposed
climate change treaties seemingly afraid of profit impacts if they have to make substantial
changes to how they do business.
However, as more climate change science has emerged over the years, many businesses are
accepting this and even asking their governments for more action so that there is quick
clarification on the new rules of the game so they can get on with their businesses.
This section explores some of those fears to see if they are justified or not.
Read Reactions to Climate Change Negotiations and Action to learn more.
For many years, large, influential businesses and governments have been
against the idea of global warming. Many have poured a lot of resources into discrediting
what has generally been accepted for a long time as real.
Now, the mainstream is generally worried about climate change impacts and the discourse
seems to have shifted accordingly. Some businesses that once engaged in disinformation
campaigns have even changed their opinions, some even requesting governments for
regulation and direction on this issue.
However, a few influential companies and organizations are still attempting to undermine
climate change action and concerns. Will all this mean a different type of spin and
propaganda with attempts at green washing and misleading information becoming the norm,
or will there now be major shift in attitudes to see concrete solutions being proposed and
implemented?
Read Global Warming, Spin and Media to learn more.
Rich countries therefore face the biggest responsibility and burden for
action to address climate change; and
This notion of climate justice is typically ignored by many rich nations and their mainstream
media, making it easy to blame China, India and other developing countries for failures in
climate change mitigation negotiations.
Development expert, Martin Khor, calculated that taking historical emissions into account,
the rich countries owe a carbon debt because they have already used more than their fair
quota of emissions.
Yet, by 2050 when certain emission reductions are needed by, their reduced emissions will
still add up to be go over their fair share:
However, rather than continue down the path of unequal development, industrialized nations
can help pay off their carbon debt by truly helping emerging countries develop along a
cleaner path, such as through the promised-but-barely-delivered technology transfer, finance,
and capacity building.
So far however, rich nations have done very little within the Kyoto protocol to reduce
emissions by any meaningful amount, while they are all for negotiating a follow on treaty that
brings more pressure to developing countries to agree to emissions targets.
In effect, the more there will be delay the more the poor nations will have to save the Earth
with their sacrifices (and if it works, as history shows, the rich and powerful will find a way
to rewrite history to claim they were the ones that saved the planet).
These issues are explored in more depth here.
Read Climate Justice and Equity to learn more.
This conference came a year after the Copenhagen conference which promised so much but
offered so little. It also came in the wake of WikiLeaks revelations of how the US in
particular tried to cajole various countries to support an accord that served US interests rather
than the worlds.
What resulted was an agreement that seems much watered down, even an almost reversal,
from original aims and spirit of climate change mitigation. In effect, the main polluters (the
industrialized nations) who should have borne the brunt of any emission reduction targets,
have managed to reduce their commitments while increasing those of the developing
countries; a great global warming swindle if any!
Read COP16Cancn Climate Conference to learn more.
An overview of the Climate Change Conference (also known as COP 14), held
in Pozna, Poland, at the beginning of December, 2008. As with past conferences, this too
was not without its controversies. For example, while the Adaptation Fund was launched the
funding of it caused lots of disagreements. The conference came at a time when Europe
seemed to weaken their usually strong stance on climate change action and on news that in
recent years, emissions from industrialized nations had risen.
Read COP14Pozna Climate Conference to learn more.
1997, at the Conference of Parties III (COP3), Kyoto, Japan, the Kyoto conference on climate
change took place. There, developed countries agreed to specific targets for cutting their
emissions of greenhouse gases. A general framework was defined for this, with specifics to be
detailed over the next few years. This became known as the Kyoto Protocol. The US
proposed to just stabilize emissions and not cut them at all, while the European Union called
for a 15% cut. In the end, there was a trade off, and industrialized countries were committed
to an overall reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases to 5.2% below 1990 levels for the
period 2008 - 2012. (The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said in its 1990 report
that a 60% reduction in emissions was needed...) As with the following COP meetings, there
was enormous media propaganda by affected big businesses and by countries such as the U.S.
who were openly hostile to the treaty. In fact one of the first things George Bush did when he
came to power was to oppose the Kyoto Protocol.
Read COP3Kyoto Protocol Climate Conference to learn more.
Energy Security
Last updated Sunday, May 15, 2011.
Human Population
Last updated Thursday, June 13, 2002.
Read Human Population to learn more.
expenditures - the poorest 20% a minuscule 1.3%", according to the United Nations
Development Programme's 1998 Human Development Report.
Read Stress on the environment, society and resources? to learn more.
Natural Disasters
Last updated Wednesday, April 06, 2011.
Read Natural Disasters to learn more.
Hurricane Katrina
Last updated Sunday, November 13, 2005.
What is the most damaging hurricane in US history, in its wake hurricane Katrina has also
left other issues, from the handling of the disaster, to the media reporting, and rebuilding
issues.
Read Hurricane Katrina to learn more.
Sustainable Development
Last updated Sunday, June 05, 2011.
Winter holidays are a time to count our blessings and to enjoy the company of family and
friends. For more and more people, the holidays are also a time to make their lives a little
greener, from their choice of decorations to the gifts they buy.
Read More
Make Your Holidays Green
Everyone knows about the power of mistletoe at Christmas, right? It turns holiday romance
democratic by making everyone equally kissable. But there is more to mistletoe than kissing
and holiday merriment.
This year, as you await your chance under the mistletoe with that special
someone, consider these fun facts--environmental and otherwise--about the
unassuming little sprig that promises to enliven your holiday season.
Photo courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey
Comments (0)
Permalink
Share
Every Christmas you ask yourself the same question: Is it better to get a real Christmas tree
that has to be discarded after a few weeks, or a fake Christmas tree you can use year after
year?
Learn about the potential health and environmental consequences of both
real and fake Christmas trees, and a third alternative that just may offer a
more eco-friendly answer.
Photo courtesy of Paul Anderson
Comments (12)
Permalink
Share
Many people figure that one of the fundamental things government is supposed to do is to
make sure all citizens have clean air to breathe and clean water to drink. This belief is so
deeply ingrained that a lot of people consider access to those life-giving resources not a basic
human right.
Yet by combing through records that the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency had been keeping under wraps, National
Public Radio and the Center for Public Integrity discovered
that millions of Americans are breathing air contaminated by
toxic chemicals that federal and state regulators were
supposed to control under the Clean Air Act.
This toxic air pollution drifts daily through hundreds of U.S. communities, leading to serious
health issues and creating a public health crisis in cities, towns and rural areas nationwide.
But the regulatory agencies may be less to blame for the problem of toxic air than the
politicians who approve their budgets. Learn more.
Photo by Getty Images
Also See:
Comments (8)
Permalink
Share
Somewhere in the world yesterday a baby was born. And not just any baby. The moment this
particular child drew breath, he or she became the 7 billionth
person living on Earth.
By almost every measure, 7 billion people is too many for our
fragile planet to support adequately. But even if we can find
some innovative ways to expand food production, provide
enough clean drinking water, supply sufficient energy and
handle the increasing flow of waste so many people produce,
the population is continuing to grow at a rapid rate and the
challenges we face today with 7 billion people will just
become more difficult in the future.
Find out more about the effects that 7 billion people will have on the planet, and how those
effects will worsen unless we find a way to control population growth.