<Project Name>

Cost Management Plan

<Insert Project Logo here>

<Month, Year>

Health and Human Services Agency, Office of Systems Integration

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

Revision History
REVISION HISTORY
REVISION/WORKSITE
#
Initial Draft SIDdocs

DATE OF
OWNER
RELEASE
06/30/2004 SID - PMO

OSI Admin #4306

04/09/2008 OSI - PMO

SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Initial Release

Incorporated Cost Management

Plan tailoring guide information
into this template. Assigned new
WorkSite document number.
OSI Admin #4306v2 01/29/2009 OSI - PMO
Moved instructions to the top of
each section; clarified information
about references to the WBS;
changed Procurement Center to
Acquisition Center.
Remove template revision history and insert Project Cost Management Plan revision
history.
Approvals
NAME

ROLE

DATE

Insert Project Approvals here.

Template Instructions:
This template offers instructions, sample language, boilerplate language, and
hyperlinks written in 12-point Arial font and distinguished by color, brackets, and
italics as shown below:
Instructions for using this template are written in purple bracketed text and
describe how to complete this document. Delete instructions from the final
version of this plan.
Sample language is written in red italic font and may be used, or modified, for
completing sections of the plan. All red text should be replaced with projectspecific information and the font changed to non-italicized black.
Standard boilerplate language has been developed for this plan. This standard
language is written in black font and may be modified with permission from the
OSI Project Management Office (PMO). Additional information may be added
to the boilerplate language sections at the discretion of the project without
PMO review.
Hyperlinks are written in blue underlined text. To return to the original
document after accessing a hyperlink, click on the back arrow in your browsers
<OSIAdmin #4306>

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

toolbar. The File Download dialog box will open. Click on Open to return to
this document.

<OSIAdmin #4306>

ii

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1
1.1 PURPOSE.........................................................................................................1
1.2 SCOPE.............................................................................................................1
1.3 REFERENCES...................................................................................................2
1.3.1 Best Practices Website..............................................................................2
1.3.2 Project Document Repository....................................................................2
1.3.3 Project Cost Database and Tool................................................................3
1.4
1.5

ACRONYMS......................................................................................................3
DOCUMENT MAINTENANCE................................................................................3

2. PARTICIPANT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES...............................................4

2.1 OFFICE OF SYSTEMS INTEGRATION (OSI).........................................................4
2.1.1 OSI Director...............................................................................................4
2.1.2 OSI Chief Deputy Director.........................................................................4
2.1.3 OSI Budget Office......................................................................................4
2.1.4 OSI Accounting Office................................................................................4
2.1.5 OSI Acquisition Center...............................................................................4
2.1.6 <Project Name> Project Director...............................................................4
2.1.7 <Project Name> Project Manager.............................................................5
2.1.8 <Project Name> Project Financial Manager..............................................5
2.1.9 <Project Name> Project Financial Analyst(s)............................................5
2.1.10

<Project Name> Project Functional Manager(s)....................................5

2.2 PROJECT SPONSOR: < ORGANIZATION NAME >.................................................5

2.2.1 Sponsor Financial Staff..............................................................................5
2.2.2 Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V).........................................5
2.2.3 Independent Project Oversight Consultant (IPOC)...................................6
2.3
2.4
2.5

FEDERAL PARTNER: < NAME >.........................................................................6

CONTRACTORS.................................................................................................6
COUNTIES/LOCAL OFFICES...............................................................................6

3. STATE BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING APPROACH.............................................6

3.1 BUDGET PLANNING...........................................................................................7
3.1.1 Project Concept Approval..........................................................................7
3.1.2 Project Document (< FSR/SPR or APD>) Development...........................7
3.1.3 Project Estimation Techniques...................................................................8
<OSIAdmin #4306>

iii

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

3.1.4 Budget Change Proposal (BCP) / Supplementary Premise Information

(SPI) Development...............................................................................................8
3.1.5 Budget Hearings and Questions................................................................8
3.1.6 Responding to Budget Drills and Analyses................................................8
3.2 ACQUISITIONS TRACKING..................................................................................9
3.2.1 Acquisitions for IT and Non-IT Goods.......................................................9
3.2.2 Acquisitions for Services............................................................................9
3.2.3 Personnel and Operations Expenditures.................................................10
3.3 EXPENDITURE REPORTS AND METRICS...........................................................11
3.4 CHANGES TO THE BUDGET..............................................................................11
3.5 BUDGET RECONCILIATION...............................................................................12
3.5.1 Yearly Reconciliation of the Projects Financial Books............................12
3.5.2 Final Reconciliation the Projects Financial Books..................................12
4. COST MANAGEMENT APPROACH...................................................................12
4.1 COST PLANNING.............................................................................................13
4.1.1 Resource Planning...................................................................................13
4.1.2 Cost Estimating........................................................................................13
4.1.3 Establishing the Cost Baseline................................................................14
4.2 COST TRACKING.............................................................................................14
4.2.1 Project Labor Hour Tracking....................................................................14
4.2.2 Consultant Costs and Labor Hours Tracking...........................................14
4.2.3 Overall Cost Tracking...............................................................................15
4.3 COST REPORTING AND METRICS....................................................................15
4.4 COST CONTROL AND CHANGES......................................................................15
4.4.1 Cost Variances.........................................................................................15
4.4.2 <Project Name> Executive Steering Committee.....................................16
4.4.3 Cost Re-Planning.....................................................................................16
4.4.4 Cost Re-Baselining..................................................................................16
4.5 COST CLOSEOUT...........................................................................................16
4.5.1 Annual Cost Summary.............................................................................16
4.5.2 Lessons Learned on Cost Management..................................................16
5. RECONCILING THE STATE PROCESS TO THE PROJECT PROCESS..........16
5.1 BUDGETING AND THE COST BASELINE.............................................................17
5.2 ATTENDANCE TRACKING AND TIME REPORTING...............................................17
5.3 INVOICE PROCESSING.....................................................................................17
5.4 BUDGET CHANGES AND COST CONTROL.........................................................18
<OSIAdmin #4306>

iv

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

5.5

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

RECONCILIATION.............................................................................................18

6. COUNTY BUDGET MANAGEMENT...................................................................18

7. PROJECT COST TOOL.......................................................................................19
7.1 COST TOOL DESCRIPTION..............................................................................19
7.2 USING THE COST TOOL..................................................................................19

List of Tables
TABLE 1. LEVELS OF COST MANAGEMENT.......................................................................1
List of Figures
FIGURE 1. RELATIONSHIP OF BUDGET/ACCOUNTING PROCESSES TO COST MANAGEMENT
PROCESSES............................................................................................................2

<OSIAdmin #4306>

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1

Purpose

The purpose of cost management is to ensure the project and its contractors will
complete the project within budget. This Cost Management Plan identifies the
processes and procedures used to manage costs throughout the projects life cycle.
The plan covers the cost management approach, expenditure tracking, variance
analysis, oversight of contractor costs, and reconciliation between the State budget,
accounting, and project management cost processes.
Additionally, the plan covers who is responsible for tracking expenditures, how
variances will be addressed, and the cost tracking and reconciliation between the
State and project management cost processes. This plan also describes the cost
management tool that will be used.
1.2

Scope

The scope encompasses the two levels of cost management for OSI projects. One
level is the detailed accounting level of tracking budget, expenditures, salary and
benefits, and overhead costs in accordance with the normal State of California
budget process. The second level is the project management level of tracking costs
against work performed in accordance with the OSI Best Practices standards
derived from the Project Management Institutes Project Management Body of
Knowledge (PMBOK). Table 1 shows the differences in terminology that will be used
in this plan when discussing the two different levels.
Table 1. Levels of Cost Management
STATE BUDGETING/ACCOUNTING
Budget Planning
Accounting/Expenditure
Tracking
Changes to the Budget
Reconciliation

PROJECT COST MANAGEMENT

Cost Planning
Cost Tracking, Reporting and
Metrics
Cost Control and Changes
Cost Closeout

Adding to the complexity is the interaction of the budget and cost management
processes with the contract management (acquisitions and invoicing) and time
reporting (attendance and timesheet tracking) processes. All of these processes
must interact and reconcile with each other.
In the figure below, the items toward the left hand side of the chart represent the
state budget, accounting and contract management processes (lightly shaded
bubbles). The items towards the right hand side of the chart represent the project
cost management processes (white bubbles). The two processes must reconcile at
the Initial Baseline, (after the Budget Act is signed) in the monthly attendance and

< OSIAdmin #4306>

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

time reporting processes, in the monthly expenditure and cost update processes,
and whenever there is a re-plan and a new baseline established.

State/Fed
Approvals

APD

Planning

And/Or

Master Project
Cost
(to the WBS Level)

FSR

Hearings

Readiness

Resource
Planning

BCC
BCP

Cost
Estimating

Budget
Act

Initial Baseline
Re-Baseline
Re-Baseline
Re-Baseline
Rev 1

Encumbrances
Amendments
POs/
Contracts

TAP
Work
Authorizations

Reconciliation

Cost
Budgeting

Tracking &
Change Control

Expenditures

Lessons
Learned &
Closeout

Time Reporting
(against WBS)

Attendance
Tracking
Reconciliation

Incorporate
Lessons
Learned

Analyze
Lessons
Learned
Cost Tracking

Re-Planning

Variance Analysis
(monthly)
Unacceptable
Acceptable
Variance
Change Control Variance
Board

Invoices

Archive
Cost Data

Figure 1. Relationship of Budget/Accounting Processes to Cost Management

Processes
CHART COLOR
White
Yellow
Pink
Gray
1.3

DESCRIPTION
Project Cost Management
Budget Baseline w/possible
revisions
Funding and Expenditure
Documentation
Contracts and Invoices

References

1.3.1 Best Practices Website

For guidance on the Office of Systems Integration (OSI) budget/cost management
methodology refer to the OSI Best Practices Website (BPWeb)
(http://www.bestpractices.osi.ca.gov).

< OSIAdmin #4306>

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

1.3.2 Project Document Repository

Refer to the WorkSite repository located at < path and/or server > for all projectspecific documentation. Indicate the location of the projects hardcopy library.
1.3.3 Project Cost Database and Tool
The current budget and expenditures are kept in a database/tool/spreadsheet
located at < path and/or server>. The Project uses the <tool name> for managing
costs.
1.4

Acronyms

List only acronyms applicable to this document. If the list becomes longer than one
page, move the acronym list to the Appendix.
APD
APDU
BCC
BCP
BPWeb
CALSTARS
CM
DGS
DOF
FSR
IPOC
IPOR
IV&V
M&O
OSI
PCA
PIER
PMBOK
SCO
SOW
SPI
SPR
TA
TAP
WBS

Advance Planning Document (Federal funding document)

Advance Planning Document Update (Federal funding document)
Budget Change Concept
Budget Change Proposal (State funding document)
Best Practices Website (http://www.bestpractices.osi.ca.gov)
California State Accounting and Reporting System
Contract Manager
Department of General Services
Department of Finance
Feasibility Study Report (State funding document)
Independent Project Oversight Consultant
Independent Project Oversight Report
Independent Verification and Validation
Maintenance and Operations
Office of Systems Integration
Program Cost Account
Post Implementation Evaluation Review
Project Management Body of Knowledge
State Controllers Office
Statement of Work
Supplementary Premise Information (CDSS Projects only)
Special Project Report (State funding document)
California Technology Agency
Task Accomplishment Plan
Work Breakdown Structure

< OSIAdmin #4306>

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

1.5

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

Document Maintenance

This document will be reviewed annually and updated as needed, as the project
proceeds through each phase of the system development life cycle. If the document
is written in an older format, the document should be revised into the latest OSI
template format at the next annual review. This document contains a revision
history log. When changes occur, the documents revision history log will reflect an
updated version number as well as the date, the owner making the change, and
change description will be recorded in the revision history log of the document.
2. PARTICIPANT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
This section describes the roles and responsibilities of the <Project Name> staff with
regard to cost management. The following are the primary participants in the budget,
accounting, and cost management processes from the projects perspective. In
some cases, one individual may perform multiple roles in the process.
2.1

Office of Systems Integration (OSI)

The Office of Systems Integration (OSI) is responsible for coordinating the state
budget and accounting processes with the projects in OSI and the appropriate
control agencies.
2.1.1 OSI Director
The OSI Director is responsible for approval of funding documents and representing
<Project Name> at the budget hearings.
2.1.2 OSI Chief Deputy Director
The OSI Chief Deputy Director is responsible for review of project funding
documents, and for representing the projects at budget hearings, as necessary.
2.1.3 OSI Budget Office
The OSI Budget Office is responsible for coordinating the review and submission of
approval documents (e.g., Feasibility Study Reports (FSRs) and Advance Planning
Document (APDs), Budget Change Concepts (BCCs), and Budget Change
Proposals (BCPs)) to the appropriate state control agencies for all OSI projects. The
Budget Office coordinates responses to questions from the control agencies and,
creates and distributes the Governors Budget. They are the single point of contact
for state communications (Control Agencies, Project Sponsors, and other State
Agencies). The OSI Budget Office also coordinates the development of the
departments travel budget which includes estimates for project travel.
2.1.4 OSI Accounting Office
The Accounting Office is responsible for coordinating the accounting, customer
billing, invoice approval processes, travel advances, and travel claims for all projects
in OSI. The Accounting Office works with the OSI Budget Office to reconcile the
budget to the expenditures.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

2.1.5 OSI Acquisition Center

The OSI Acquisition Center is responsible for coordinating the acquisition of IT and
Non-IT goods and services on behalf of the project.
2.1.6 <Project Name> Project Director

The Project Director is responsible for approval of the Project Cost Management
Plan and is ultimately responsible for the allocation and expenditure of the project
budget.
2.1.7 <Project Name> Project Manager

The Project Manager is responsible for managing and reviewing project costs from a
project management perspective to ensure appropriate progress is being made for
the funds being expended. The Project Manager works with the financial staff to
reconcile the cost management data to the current accounting data.
2.1.8 <Project Name> Project Financial Manager

The Financial Manager is responsible for leading the cost management effort,
sponsoring cost budgeting and tracking activities, facilitating communication on fiscal
status, and ensuring the project cost tool is maintained and supporting
documentation is maintained. The Financial Manager is responsible for providing the
Project Manager with recommendations and status on the project budget and
expenditures. This role must be performed by a state employee. If the Project
Manager is a state employee they may assume this role.
2.1.9 <Project Name> Project Financial Analyst(s)

The Financial Analyst(s) are responsible for coordinating and developing project
funding and approval documents and expenditure tracking and reconciliation in
accordance with state processes. The analysts also work with the Financial Manager
to reconcile the cost management and accounting data.
2.1.10

<Project Name> Project Functional Manager(s)

The Functional Manager(s) are responsible for identifying funding needs and for
assisting with the tracking of expenditures, including tracking of staff effort and costs.
2.2

Project Sponsor: < Organization Name >

Section 2.2 should be updated to reflect the name of the sponsor organization.
IV&V/IPOC may be removed if the project is not required to have this function.
2.2.1 Sponsor Financial Staff
The sponsors financial staff works with the project financial staff to develop the
sponsors budget in coordination with the projects budget. The sponsor financial
staff is also responsible for authorizing payment for project services.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

2.2.2 Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V)

Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) provides an independent
determination of whether development products satisfy the intended use and the
user needs when operated in the environment for which they are intended
(verification), and whether the products satisfy the specified requirements of the
project (validation).

2.2.3 Independent Project Oversight Consultant (IPOC)

Independent Project Oversight Consultant (IPOC) provide an independent review of
the project management of a project to ensure approved project plans and sound
management practices are used to minimize risk. The IPOC submits a status report
to the California Technology Agency (TA) monthly, or as required that includes a
summary of the projects current budget status based on information from the project
financial staff.
2.3

Federal Partner: < Name >

Section 2.3 should be updated to reflect the name of the federal partner, if
applicable. Add any additional information regarding federal participation, reporting
or required approvals, as appropriate.
The projects federal partner is responsible for review and approval of project
funding documents.
2.4

Contractors

If the project has a prime contractor, indicate how the prime participates in the
projects budgeting, including coordination of planned costs for the next fiscal year
(particularly during M&O) and reporting of cost data for inclusion in project cost
management processes.
The Contractor is responsible for reporting appropriate costs to the project and to
their efforts as described in their contract. The contractor is responsible for
managing costs internal to their activities. The contractor should report their costs in
their monthly status reports and raise potential or actual cost variances or problems
to the project team at appropriate status meetings.
2.5

Counties/Local Offices

If the project is reimbursing counties/local offices for implementation or other

development costs, this section describes the primary responsibilities and which
areas/groups within the counties/local offices participate in the funding requests and
tracking.
The counties/local offices submit requests for reimbursement of implementation
costs and assist with expenditure tracking and reconciliation.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

3. STATE BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING APPROACH

The following sections summarize the projects involvement in the state budget and
accounting processes.

Step 1 - Budget Planning

Step 2 - Acquisitions Tracking

Step 3 - Acquisitions Reports and Metrics

Step 4 - Changes to the Budget

Step 5 - Budget Reconciliation

The section introduction should remain untouched.

The following sections should describe the high-level processes and interaction of
participants. Refer to separate more detailed processes/procedures, as necessary.
3.1

Budget Planning

This section is intended to be written generically enough to describe both the Fall
and Spring Budget Processes.
The state budget is established on a yearly basis, the funding for the project is only
secured for one year at a time (although requests for future year funding may be
reviewed, but not guaranteed).
3.1.1 Project Concept Approval
Describe how the initial project approval and approximate budget was
established/received and what might cause a new concept (e.g., welfare reform, new
M&O initiatives, etc.). Discuss where the funding is coming from: grants, general
fund, bonds, federal funding, etc. and any restrictions on the money that was/may be
received.
Describe who is responsible for the development of any new BCCs. If appropriate,
discuss the annual Interagency Agreement updates and how that affects the budget
and new concepts. Describe the organizational coordination required to establish the
BCC and, if companion BCCs must be used (e.g., one BCC for OSI and one BCC
for the Sponsor which are dependent on each other), who is responsible for what
types of activities, etc.
When appropriate, new project concepts or staffing requests are proposed through
the development of a Budget Change Concept (BCC) and high-level cost estimates
(refer to Section 4.1 for more on developing cost estimates). The project financial
staff prepares the BCCs in accordance with instructions provided by the OSI Budget
Office. The OSI Budget Office coordinates the review of BCCs with the OSI Director
and Agency.
3.1.2 Project Document (< FSR/SPR or APD>) Development

Based on the specific project, describe the project document development process.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

Federal Funded Projects: utilize the APD documentation process. Indicate if a

separate FSR and APD are submitted or if the APD is used in lieu of the FSR/SPR.
Indicate how the APD format was customized to meet state needs. Annual updates
to the APD are called APDU.
If the BCC is approved, the project financial staff create a project document
(FSR/SPR) which requests approval for the project from the state control agencies
<and, if appropriate, the federal partner>. In addition, the project financial staff
reviews the projects current expenditures and identifies any adjustments which may
need to be made as a result of changes to the Interagency Agreement or
Memoranda of Understanding, or as a result of project progress.
The project financial staff coordinates approvals from OSI, <and, if appropriate, the
federal partner>. The OSI Budget Office coordinates approvals from the state control
agencies.
3.1.3 Project Estimation Techniques
Describe how the budget was derived and what historical data or industry materials
were used as the basis of estimates. Describe the process used to validate
estimates and the supporting materials that were used. Indicate if any independent
review of the estimates was/is performed.
TA requires supporting data for estimates to be retained by cost category. Indicate
where this information is stored.
The original project budget estimates were developed using < xxxxx >, and validated
using < xxxxx >. Estimates for new concepts use the same techniques.
3.1.4 Budget Change Proposal (BCP) / Supplementary Premise Information
(SPI) Development
CDSS Projects Only: utilize the SPI (in lieu of BCP) document.
The <Project Name> financial staff develops a Budget Change Proposal (BCP)
which requests funding for the concept or initiative described in the approval
document. The OSI Budget Office coordinates the review of the BCP with the project
sponsors, and submits the BCP to the Control Agencies.
3.1.5 Budget Hearings and Questions
Discuss who will attend the budget hearings and prepare supporting materials for
the hearing.
Discuss how questions or comments from the feds are addressed, if appropriate.
Discuss how the project manages the encumbrances at the project, what tool is
used (or spreadsheet name/location), and how the projects encumbrances initially
are coordinated with OSI Accounting.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

The Budget Office coordinates any questions regarding the budget proposals, and
assists with the budget hearings. Once the Budget Act is signed, the project financial
staff reviews the final Budget Act for any change to the requested amounts.
The Project Manager and Project Financial staff reviews the budget against the cost
estimates, and adjust the cost baseline, if necessary.
3.1.6 Responding to Budget Drills and Analyses
If the project responds to budget drills, it may be useful to include this section.
Discuss the approach to budget drills: who coordinates the response, who reviews
the information, who must approve the response, and how responses are
coordinated with the sponsor (and when coordination is appropriate). Also discuss
other budget analyses and reviews that may be required to support budget
reductions, changes in project approach or scope, changes in rates, analysis of
proposed contractor work orders or amendments, etc. This section should discuss
only the analysis of proposed changes. Refer to the Changing the Project Budget
section (below) to describe the specific processes to enact a change.
3.2

Acquisitions Tracking

Discuss other types of expenditures, as appropriate, including sponsor bills and

county/local office claims and approvals.
After the Budget Act is signed, the project may begin expending the funds for the
fiscal year. Typically the expenditures include acquisitions for products and services,
personnel costs, and operations costs. The project works with OSIs Acquisitions
Center and OSIs Accounting Office, respectively, to procure and pay for the
necessary items.
3.2.1 Acquisitions for IT and Non-IT Goods
Discuss how any equipment purchases are handled, focusing on responsibilities of
the different organizations involved. Focus on project specific items, not things
described in other plans/state manuals or items provided by the prime contractor.
Usually the Administrative and IT staff coordinate these types of acquisitions.
Discuss:

Who does the product research (e.g., IT, functional manager, requestor, etc.)

Who has approval authority for the equipment purchase

Who works with OSI Acquisition Center to conduct the purchase

Who tests/verifies the equipment

Who approves the invoice

Who tracks licenses/on-going subscriptions/warranties and their costs and

expirations

< OSIAdmin #4306>

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

Who pays for the equipment (sponsor, project, OSI)

If appropriate, describe specific coding or cost allocations

How are the equipment costs tracked/depreciated and who is responsible for
tracking depreciation (project vs. OSI)

The project Administrative and IT staff work with the OSI Acquisition Center to
identify and document specific requirements for equipment. The OSI Acquisition
Center solicits vendors to obtain the desired equipment at the best price from the
various DGS supplier lists. The project notifies OSI Acquisition Center and the
Accounting Office when the equipment is received and if it meets the stated
requirements. Upon approval by the project office, the Accounting Office coordinates
payment to the vendor.
3.2.2 Acquisitions for Services
Discuss briefly how project contracts are procured and how contract expenditures
are handled. If contract withholds, liquidated damages, etc. are used, describe the
processes to track and invoke these refer to the appropriate contract management
processes for additional information. Discuss any coordination performed with the
Acquisitions and Contract Manager for tracking deliverables, services, invoices,
withholds, and liquidated damages.
The project Procurement and Contract Management staff work with the OSI
Acquisition Center to identify and document specific requirements for the desired
services. The OSI Acquisition Center solicits offers/proposals from qualified bidders,
coordinates questions/answers to the requirements and oversees with the review
and evaluation of offers/proposals. The project works with OSI Acquisition Center to
conduct interviews, if appropriate, and selects the winning bidder. The OSI
Acquisition Center creates and issues the contract documents.
Depending on the contract amount, either the OSI Director or Agency Secretary is
the final approver of consultant contracts. The Project Manager is the approver of
the Task Accomplishment Plans (TAPs), and consultant invoices. The Project
Functional Manager tracks the contractor day-to-day tasking, performs review of
consultant work products, and assists with invoice review and approvals.
The project has three to five working days to respond to contractor invoices, in
accordance with Government Code Section 927 (California Prompt Payment Act).
The contractor submits official invoices to OSI Accounting. OSI Accounting Office
sends the Project a copy of the invoice for review and approval. The project financial
staff reviews the invoice against the deliverable tracking log and the attached
timesheets to validate the information. The Project Manager reviews the invoice and
Project Financial Analysts comments and recommendations, and makes the final
decision to approve or reject an invoice. The approval or rejection notice is faxed to
the OSI Accounting Office who coordinates payment with the State Controllers
Office. Refer also to the Contract Management Plan for more on invoice processing
and review.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

10

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

3.2.3 Personnel and Operations Expenditures

Discuss how staff costs are tracked including the accounting of salary and benefits.
Also discuss tracking of operations costs and overhead.

What tool is used for tracking expenditures

Where does the expenditure data come from

How often is the tool updated

What expenditure reports are generated or received by the project

Who submits these, to where, and when

What happens if there is a discrepancy between received reports and project

info? How is the problem researched and resolved?

Discuss where actual expenditure data comes from, how the expenditures are
validated for accuracy, and how they are coded and posted to the project
expenditure tracking tools.
Discuss if there is any coordination with the sponsor regarding monthly or quarterly
expenditures. Discuss any coordination with county/local offices for their
expenditures.
The project tracks all contract, personnel and operations expenditures in <Insert
Expenditure Tool>. At the close of each month, the project receives expenditure
reports from the Accounting Office showing the funds that were expended according
to California State Accounting and Reporting System (CALSTARS). The project
reviews and validates the expenditures match with their records of expenditure
approvals and works with the Accounting Office to resolve any discrepancies.
3.3

Expenditure Reports and Metrics

Discuss any accounting/expenditure reports, contractual financial summaries, or

staff salary/benefits reports generated by the project that are used to track and
monitor costs. Discuss how the reports and metrics are used and how often they are
analyzed/reviewed for correctness.
If the project is participating in county/local office costs, add a section to address the
specific reports that are generated for and received from the counties/local offices.
Discuss how the project provides data to the IPOC in support of the TA Independent
Project Oversight Report (IPOR). If the project does not have an IPOC, indicate who
submits this report.
Expenditure reports are generated for project use in validation and tracking of
expenditures against the budget. The OSI Accounting Office is responsible for
sending appropriate reports to the sponsor, as requested.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

11

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

3.4

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

Changes to the Budget

Describe the process used to review and approve a project budget change. This
section should discuss the typical reasons and types of changes such as moving
dollars between fiscal years, addressing changes in project approach (usually
requiring an SPR), addressing minor changes such as coding/category changes,
etc. Describe the approvals required for each type of change and the archiving of the
prior cost baseline/budget and establishment of the new cost baseline/budget.
Discuss supporting materials that must be kept and/or generated to support the
approval process.
Discuss required approvals include a reference to the Budget Development section
of the plan for the procedures to enact a change, as appropriate. Include a reference
to the contract management processes for changing a contract dollar amount.
If the project budget needs to be adjusted, the Project Manager determines if an
approval document (e.g., APD or FSR) and/or BCP/SPI needs to be written to
address the change. If a change is deemed necessary, the financial staff develops
the approval document and/or BCP/SPI. The OSI Budget Office coordinates the
submission and approvals of the document(s) in accordance with the state budget
cycle.
Once the change is approved and included in the appropriate fiscal year budget, the
Project Manager works with the financial analyst to re-baseline the cost data and
estimates.
3.5

Budget Reconciliation

Describe any specific procedures or actions taken to reconcile, such as hiring an

independent auditor or coordinating with other projects to reconcile each others
books independently. Describe any reconciliation of county/local office expenditures
and any coordination with the sponsor. Streamlined projects may combine these
sections.
3.5.1 Yearly Reconciliation of the Projects Financial Books
Discuss how end-of-fiscal-year reconciliations are performed and what reports are
generated. Indicate how discrepancies are addressed and where the fiscal year
information is stored. Indicate if any outside auditors are used to validate the
information.
The Project Financial Manager is responsible for coordinating and performing the
reconciliation of the actual expenditures to the approved budget, and working with
the OSI Accounting Office to address any issues. Project Financial staff performs an
internal reconciliation annually in preparation for the official reconciliation with the
OSI Accounting Office (typically in July-August). Reconciliation includes a
comparison of actual to planned expenditures as well as actual expenditures against
the approved budget.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

12

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

3.5.2 Final Reconciliation the Projects Financial Books

This section may be left as TBD for the first iteration of the plan, but should be
completed, at the latest, by the time the solicitation for a prime contractor is initiated,
in case the procurement and project are cancelled.
Discuss if there is a final audit of the projects books (internally, by OSI, by the
sponsor, or by an independent contractor), how the project performs
disencumbrances, and any final accounting reports that may be generated for OSI,
the sponsor, the control agencies or the feds.
Discuss the financial reports that are included in the Post Implementation Evaluation
Report (PIER).
Discuss the final archiving of the projects budget and accounting papers and any
financial tools.
4. COST MANAGEMENT APPROACH
This section describes cost management from the PMBOK perspective. Projects
have some leeway in the amount of rigor applied to this area, but must establish a
cost baseline and perform some comparison of actual costs to the cost baseline.
Changes to the cost baseline must be documented.

The following section summarizes the project management processes for managing
costs on the project as tailored from the PMBOK 1.

Step 1 - Cost Planning

Step 2 - Cost Tracking

Step 3 - Cost Reporting and Metrics

Step 4 - Cost Control and Changes

Step 5 - Cost Closeout

Communication is a key part of the cost management process and occurs at every
step of the process among the project team, project stakeholders and consultant
team.
4.1

Cost Planning

4.1.1 Resource Planning

1

The project has chosen to tailor the PMBOK guidance on Cost as follows: The planning processes
of Cost (Resource Planning, Cost Estimating, and Cost Budgeting) have been consolidated into a
section called Cost Planning. The PMBOK Controlling processes (Cost Control) have been expanded
into four sections called Cost Tracking, Cost Reporting and Metrics, Cost Control and Changes, and
Cost Closeout.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

13

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

Discuss the inputs used to establish the resource estimates. Indicate where the
resources estimates and supporting information is located/stored.
Cost estimation begins upon completion of the project WBS2. Resource skills are
determined based on the needs of the project and the products being produced. The
project uses and tailors the personnel resource information from the <Project Name>
Staff Management Plan and <Project Name> Responsibility Assignment Matrix for
determining needed resource skills.
4.1.2 Cost Estimating
Describe any specific cost methods used to validate or confirm the costs estimates
for the various tasks. Refer to PMBOK, regarding Cost Estimating for more info.
Discuss correlation of cost allocations to the project budget (chart of accounts) or put
this information in Section 5 on Reconciling the Accounting/PM Perspectives.
Hour estimates are created for each WBS item. The necessary skill sets and staff
labor categories are identified for each WBS element. Approximate costs are
estimated based on the anticipated classification of staff assigned to the work.
The anticipated costs are allocated to each WBS item and totaled. Resource/labor
costs are allocated by resource category and total.
The estimates are then used to request funding or funding adjustments for the
project (refer to Section 3.1 on state budget requests). Risks associated with the
cost estimates are documented and included in the risk management database.
4.1.3 Establishing the Cost Baseline
Describe how the cost baseline is set and what approvals are required. Indicate if
the baseline is set manually (by saving a clean copy to fall back to, or a new
version in WorkSite) or what specific tool feature is used to establish the cost
baseline.
Once the Budget Act is signed, the Project Manager and Project Financial Analyst
review the cost allocation (of funding per WBS item) against the approved budget,
and adjust the allocations, if necessary, to reflect the approved funding for the year.
Upon approval by the Project Manager, the cost allocations are baselined. For more
information on the current cost allocations to WBS items, refer to the projects
Master Project Plan.
4.2

Cost Tracking

Actual hours expended are recorded and validated against attendance records and
contractor monthly reports. The hours are converted to costs for tracking the cost of
current progress to determine if the project is staying within and expected to
complete within budget.

Refer to the project Master Project Plan to obtain the projects WBS and refer to the project
Schedule Management Plan for a description of how the WBS was established.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

14

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

4.2.1 Project Labor Hour Tracking

Indicate how project (state) staff track their hours against the projects schedule and
assigned work from the WBS. Indicate which WBS level work is tracked against.
Indicate how labor hours are translated to costs.
Describe how staff submits timesheets and/or how they use the labor hour tracking
worksheet to record hours against the WBS items:

Where is the data located

Who is responsible for entering the data (each individual)?

What type of data is recorded

Who reviews/validates the data has been entered

Who ensures the sheets are setup and ready for use

4.2.2 Consultant Costs and Labor Hours Tracking

Discuss how consultant costs are tracked and how their labor hours are rolled up
into the overall tracking of labor hours against the project WBS items. Indicate
which WBS level the consultant items are included in.
Consultants are required to submit monthly timesheets showing labor hours worked
by SOW tasks. Each SOW task is mapped to a specific WBS item by the Project
Functional Manager.
4.2.3 Overall Cost Tracking
Discuss how the overall cost of the project (e.g., overhead, facility, benefits, etc.) is
tracked. Indicate if just staff and contract costs are considered project costs.
FYI: The Technology Agency requires
Actual costs to be recorded by cost category
Comparison of actual costs to budgeted costs on a regular basis
Supporting data for actual costs to be retained
Overall costs are compared to the budgeted project costs on a monthly basis by the
Project Financial Manager. The overall costs are comprised of the actual labor hours
(state and consultant) and project expenditures for the month (received from the
project financial staff). Variances are reviewed and analyzed to determine the cause
and possible mitigations or corrections.
4.3

Cost Reporting and Metrics

To assist with tracking actual costs against the baseline, the following charts/reports
are used. The charts are available in the <Insert reporting tool such as CalSTARS,
Excel, etc>, and are updated as described below.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

15

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

Spending Plan (by fiscal year) a run chart showing the actual costs against
the baseline by month for the fiscal year and the cumulative total to date for
the fiscal year.
Cost by WBS Item - a bar chart showing the labor costs by Level 1 WBS items
by month for the fiscal year and the cumulative total to date for the fiscal year.
Cost Variance by WBS Item a bar chart showing the actual costs against the
baseline to date.
Labor Hours by WBS Deliverable Item a bar chart showing the amount of
effort expended towards the Level 1 WBS items by month for the fiscal year
and the cumulative total (to date) for the fiscal year.
The Project Manager and Project Financial Manager will compile the reports and
submit the reports to the Project Director and if needed, Project Executive Steering
committee consistent with the Communication Management Plan reporting
requirements.
4.4

Cost Control and Changes

4.4.1 Cost Variances

For variances against the baseline of more than ten percent at the Level 1 WBS
deliverable items, the rational for the variance is documented in the associated
report and discussed at the management staff meeting. If the variance does not
affect the overall project cost baseline, no other actions are required.
4.4.2 <Project Name> Executive Steering Committee

If the overall cost baseline is affected, the variance is documented and reported to
the Project Director and, subsequently, the <Project Name> Executive Steering
Committee. The Project Director and the <Project Name> Executive Steering
Committee review the rationale and discuss the options and mitigations for dealing
with the variance, and determine if a re-plan, is necessary. If so, the issue and
recommendation is presented to the <Project Name> Executive Committee for
review and approval. The <Project Name> Executive Steering Committee makes the
policy decision to amend the projects cost, scope, schedule, or quality.
4.4.3 Cost Re-Planning
If a re-plan is deemed necessary by the <Project Name> Executive Steering
Committee, the project prepares documents to address the re-plan. The state
funding documents are included in the next budget cycle and are subject to the
normal review and approval processes.
4.4.4 Cost Re-Baselining
Once the re-plan is approved, the Project Manager works with the Project Financial
Manager to re-baseline the cost data and estimates based on the approved funding.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

16

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

The project works with the OSI Accounting Office to adjust their encumbrances and
accounting tools to reflect the re-plan.
4.5

Cost Closeout

At the end of the project, the cost historical information is completed by the Project
Financial Manager, reviewed by the Project Manager, submitted to OSI Budget
Office for review and then forwarded to TA.
4.5.1 Annual Cost Summary
At the end of the fiscal year, the Project Manager and Project Financial Manager
summarize the actual hours and costs expended against the baseline for the fiscal
year. The annual summary is archived for historical purposes.
4.5.2 Lessons Learned on Cost Management
Lessons learned related to costs and cost estimation are used in the development of
the subsequent fiscal years cost baseline.
5. RECONCILING THE STATE PROCESS TO THE PROJECT PROCESS
As discussed previously, the State budgeting and accounting processes operate
separately from the project cost management processes, though they are related.
This section discusses the relationships and where these processes must interact
and synchronize.
5.1

Budgeting and the Cost Baseline

Once the project management baseline (or revised) budgets have been finalized, the
<Project Name> team must determine if future Annual budget demands require
adjustments to OSIs base spending authority. If additional spending authority is
required, a BCP must be prepared. If additional spending authority is not required,
the project adjusts the cost baseline to reflect the actual approved budget for the
fiscal year.
5.2

Attendance Tracking and Time Reporting

Specifically discuss how the attendance tracking and time reporting processes relate
and reconcile to each other as part of the cost tracking process. Who is responsible
for the coordination and reconciling? What happens when there is a discrepancy?
Do not repeat information that has been discussed in prior sections, but summarize
or refer to the appropriate section, as applicable.
State staff submits monthly attendance reports at the end of the month. These
reports are used by OSI Accounting to bill the project for state staff salary and
benefits.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

17

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

5.3

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

Invoice Processing

Invoices must clearly identify the products (deliverables) and service period for
which the invoice is requesting payment. The prime contractor and nonprime
contractors must adhere to specific invoice requirements set forth in the contract.
All contractor invoices are sent directly to OSIs Accounting Office. This office logs
the invoice, begins the processing cycle and coordinates the actual payment with the
SCO once all the appropriate approvals have been received. The Accounting Office
retains the original invoice.
The California Prompt Payment Act (Government Code Section 927, et seq.)
established a 45-day turnaround time for payment of undisputed invoices. The 45day period begins when the invoice is received at OSI and ends when the check is
sent from the SCO to the contractor. OSI has only 30 days to process the invoice
and route it to SCO for payment. Within these 30 days, the <Project Name> project
has only five business days to process the invoice and fax the response back to
the Accounting Office. (Projects that exceed their allotted five-business day review
will incur the late penalty fees should payment not be issued within the 45-day time
frame allowed.) The SCO has 15 days to process the check request.
After logging the invoice, the Accounting Office routes a copy of the invoice to the
project for review and approval. Upon receipt of the invoice at the project, it is routed
to the Project Financial Analyst who verifies that the personnel, classifications, and
rates in the invoice correspond to the terms in the contract. The Project Financial
Analyst also verifies the PCA codes are correct, if applicable. If travel expenses have
been included, the Financial Analyst verifies the contractor is authorized to bill for
travel expenses, the necessary receipts are present and under no circumstances will
claim exceed the states allowable travel rates. The invoice is then routed to the
Contract Manager (CM).
If the invoice is from a nonprime contractor, the CM will verify that all deliverables for
that billing month have been received and approved. If the deliverable(s) has not
been approved, the invoice will not be approved for payment. If the invoice is from
the prime contractor, the CM will verify that all issues relating to withholds and
liquidated damages have been reviewed and addressed.
If all the information is acceptable, the invoice is passed to the Project Manager for
final review and signature. If the Project Manager approves the invoice, the
approved paperwork is sent back to the OSI Accounting Unit, who will then send a
payment request to the SCO.
If some or all of the deliverables or services were unacceptable, the CM notifies the
Accounting Office that the invoice is unacceptable and indicates why the invoice is
being disputed. The OSI Accounting Office sends a notice of invoice dispute (Form
209) to the contractor indicating why the invoice cannot be paid and what must be
done or corrected. The 45-day processing clock stops when the Accounting Office
sends the notice of invoice dispute to the contractor. After addressing the problems,
the contractor re-submits an invoice for payment to OSIs Accounting Office and the
processing clock is reset and restarted.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

18

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

5.4

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

Budget Changes and Cost Control

Changes to the annual OSI budget and spending plan may be required by the
project to support a re-plan. The Project Manager and Project Financial Manager will
partner to ensure that the State budget and the project management baseline
estimates match. Corrective actions or change requests will follow the appropriate
project change or budget change processes.
5.5

Reconciliation

At the end of the fiscal year and at the end of the project, a reconciliation must be
completed using both the project cost management and project accounting
processes. The expenditures must reconcile to the approved budget and also to the
OSI accounting system.
6. COUNTY BUDGET MANAGEMENT
If the project is reimbursing counties/local offices for costs, this section is
mandatory.
If the project involves payment of county costs or reimbursements to counties or
local offices, this section is considered mandatory. For projects not dealing with
county/local office funding, this section should be marked as not applicable.
Complete this section by discussing budget planning, cost allocations, spending
authorities, expenditure approvals, expenditure tracking and receipts, and
reconciliation.
Additional procedures for the county/local office should be developed and
referenced in this plan which describes how to request state funding for county
activities; how the request is reviewed, approved and included in the project/sponsor
budget; and how the actual funding is provided/reimbursed to the county.
7. PROJECT COST TOOL
If the project is using a database tool (MS Access) or other software package (other
than MS Excel) for tracking costs and budget information, this section should be
included.
If the project only uses MS Excel spreadsheets, then indicate this and list the names
and WorkSite numbers (or location) of the spreadsheets and their purpose.
7.1

Cost Tool Description

Identify and discuss the primary features of the tool/database. Indicate the
manufacturer/developer and who is responsible for maintenance and upgrades of
the tool. Indicate the platform and version of the tool. Indicate why the tool was
selected. Indicate any interfaces or dependencies to other tools.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

19

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

Discuss security and user accounts. Indicate if the data is considered sensitive and if
there are any special approvals for data updates or major changes. Indicate if there
was any customization done for the project that is different from the standard
version.
Indicate where the user manual and/or training materials are located or accessed.
7.2

Using the Cost Tool

Discuss the specifics about using a tool including the primary features and reports
used by the project. Refer to the specific procedures available and any tips/tricks for
using the tool. If appropriate, attach supporting information in an appendix or refer to
where it may be found.

APPENDICES

< OSIAdmin #4306>

20

<Project Name>
Office of System Integration

Cost Management Plan

July 30, 2004

Appendices may be added to provide additional specific information on the

projects budget/cost processes. Typical appendices include a listing of the
specific pseudo codes and charge codes to be used to report costs to the
sponsor; the specific reports (or examples) which are used to communicate to
the sponsor and/or department; and specific posting or claiming instructions
and cost assumptions for historical reference.

< OSIAdmin #4306>

21