THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SIX SIGMA IN SERVICES SECTORS-libre PDF
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SIX SIGMA IN SERVICES SECTORS-libre PDF
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SIX SIGMA IN SERVICES SECTORS-libre PDF
MBA Programme
Table of Contents
II.
III.
Conclusions: .......................................................................................................................................... 23
References ............................................................................................................................................ 24
Page 2
Introduction
In order for any organization to achieve a competitive advantage, it has to firmly adopt quality
management as the most essential strategy. Total quality management TQM, Statistical quality
control SQC, and Zero defects were the traditional quality methodologies until Six Sigma has
been introduced. (Nonthaleerak and Hendry, 2005).
Since 1986 when first introduced and promoted by Motorola and then recognized and adopted by
major corporates such as GE (General Electric) in the mid-1990s.
Six Sigma received high recognition and spread exponentially through manufacturing industries
because it enabled organizations to measure defects in units, however, until now Six Sigma
implementation in service industries is limited and inadequate. The basic argument related to this
limitation in implementation is the intangibility and the unmeasurably nature of the service
processes, therefore these processes are not flexible to be improved using the Six Sigma
methodologies. But in the recent years, and in a rebuttal to this argument, Six Sigma has been
approved as an effective approach for quality improvement in service sectors especially at
healthcare and financial services. (Hensley and Dobie, 2005). In this research project, the
literature of definition and methodologies of Six Sigma are being exhibited, and an analysis of
the need of Six Sigma in service industry over other quality management tools is presented with
implementation tools and techniques, benefits, challenges and limitations with particularities in
research on healthcare as a sector case study, finally, recommendations are given based on the
sector challenges analysis.
Defects percentage
69%
31%
6.7%
0.62%
0.023%
0.00034%
0.0000019%
To statistically visualize the concept of defect reduction in six sigma, the below Figure illustrates
the range of accepted shifts in six sigma
Figure 1: Defective items can be minimized by maintaining 6 standard deviations (6 sigmas) between
the processes mean average and its upper and lower specification limits Source:
<http://www.goleansixsigma.com/>
Six Sigma is an operating tool driving towards quality and organizational excellence and can be
beneficially shared by customers, employees, suppliers and stakeholders. It can also be termed
Page 4
Improving service quality will gain better customer satisfaction and loyalty
relying on data-driven framework will generate effective decisions by top management
harmonising internal operations by spreading information and awareness of many tools
and practices will lead to employee job satisfaction and consequently to more
profitability and better market position
eliminate non-value added operations will result in faster service delivery
unifying service level to be consistent and more predictable,
transform the mind set in the company to proactive thinking
Enhanced cross-functional teamwork through the organisation.
The below table (table 2) can describe some areas where Six Sigma can be implemented in
diverse services sectors: (Jiju Antony, 2006)
Page 5
Page 6
Discovering and selecting strengths and weaknesses to find out areas of improvement.
III.
ANALYSIS PHASE:
The below critical points should be looked at this phase:
Display the integral root cause of glitch in the process.
Understanding the root cause which results in defects and formulate them for further
research.
Finding the nature, characteristics and patterns of available data.
Determining the crucial process of service and showing them with financial benefits, i.e.
on how the cost would be reduced.
IV.
IMPROVE PHASE:
The phase of improvement constitutes of below issues:
Development of impeccable solutions to fix glitches and preventing them from happening
again.
Measuring the impact of every solution by using a proper matrix of criteria and decision.
Tools which result in high customer satisfaction and root level savings to the company
need to be examined as to how cost, time and manpower would be incurred to run it.
Measure the risk associated with every alternative.
Documenting and proving improvement is an important aspect before implying Six
Sigma.
Timely evaluation of effect of every solution is critical.
V.
CONTROL PHASE:
The aspect of controlling phase should include the following:
Establishing efficient plan and actions in order to sustain new process performance level.
Development of new processes and methods for long term benefits.
Setting up processes for control and measuring the efficiency of the tool.
Finding an owner of a process and framing his role.
Research and authenticate profits and cost savings.
Documentation of new process is of high importance.
Closure of the project, documenting key lessons learnt.
Publication of internal and external reports
The below diagram illustrates the interaction between phases in DMAIC methodology:
Six sigma for service processes Jiju Antony Division of Management, Caledonian Business School, Glasgow Caledonian Un iversity, Glasgow,
Scotland, UK, Business Process Management Journal Vol. 12 No. 2, 2006 pp. 234-248 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Page 8
The below table discusses these challenges and the phase they occur in with providing solutions
within the DMAIC Methodology:
Page 9
Table 3: Overcoming the challenges of implementing Six Sigma in service industries, (Mohammad
Abdolshah, Md. Yusof b. Ismail and Tang Sai Hon, 2009)
Page 10
Personal attendance in Six Sigma training sessions and clarifying doubts of the students ;
Making reviews Making surprise visits for Six Sigma review session on monthly or weekly basis;
Making visits to the manufacturing sites and observing call procedures to ensure that Six Sigma is
followed at root level; and
Discussion of progress of Six Sigma with Master Black belt team with reports and data on
monthly basis.
Achieving desirable quality levels of Six Sigma would require commitment and active involvement for
every employee at every level in the organization. The organization would need to review skills of every
employee before deploying Six Sigma plan.
The organization which follow Six Sigma methodology has its employees trained rigorously on statistics
and data and can be divided into expertise level of black, green, master black belt and champions.
(Hendericks and Kelbaugh, 1998).
Training :
One of the most crucial aspects of implementing Six Sigma would be to communicate all the employees
in the organization the benefits of Six Sigma and ensure their training level also improves their comfort
level.
The training for Six Sigma can be delivered by both internal and outsourced training which comes in
various packages. (Hendericks and Kelbaugh, 1998)
Tools :
The organization needs to be provide its employees set of tools to achieve highest levels of Six Sigma
Some of the effective tools are shown in the table below:
Page 11
Table 4: Successful employment of Six Sigma (Kim M. Henderson and James R. Evans, 2000)
Page 12
Competition
Patient Safety
Increase In Healthcare Costs
Liability
Internal Resistance
Malpractice Insurance Cost
Lack of Financial Resources
Lack of Time
Lack of Human Resources
Poor Training
Lack of Leadership
Poor Project Selection
Human element is the first challenge when planning to implement Six Sigma, it will need to
Leverage the data of human behaviour and Combine with cultural strategy in healthcare. The
change curve diagram describes the process of transition in human behaviour in adapting to new
frameworks (Fishers transition curve, 2012)
Page 13
The shape of U in this diagram walks through the elementary stages from left to the final stages
to the right, the role of leadership is to understand the phase where the employee is standing at
while rolling out new implementations and ideas, some employees might live in a specific phase
for a long time without adopting to change which has a significant impact on successful
implementation of Six Sigma framework. A solution oriented mind set will make the employees
transition from the left to the right side of the curve successful.
The commitment and support of the top management will be the key factor in the organizations
cultural change. By designing strategies customized to the imperatives of the healthcare
organization and maintaining sustainable monitoring and support.
Another methodology which can be added to the DMAIC is the DFSS (design for six sigma)
which enables the organization to improve existing processes or create ideas for new ones.
The below Figure demonstrates the interaction between all elements in a healthcare project to
reach the main goal of quality management tool: customer satisfaction.
Page 14
Figure 4: The core of six sigma applications in healthcare: (patient satisfaction) - source: Mehmet Tolga
Taner, lent Sezen and Jiju Antony, 2007)
Service Level: The metrics of service level help in matching the performance level with
expectations of the patients.
Service Cost: This metrics measures the cost incurred by the organization in meeting the
optimum performance levels.
Customer Satisfaction: Indicators determining the customer satisfaction may be divided
into patients, payers, staff, family etc.
Clinical Excellence: Metrics may be used to measure a particular pathway or a
department.eg. use of aspirin in treatment of a disease or effective use to radiology
department in the hospital
Page 15
The Tests And Results From Laboratory Need To Accurate And Without Error;
Effective And Accurate Process For Billing To Reduce Unnecessary Wastage Of Time;
Page 16
A major dissatisfaction registered by patients is waiting time for surgery. From hospitals
perspective it resulted in increased costs and wasted resources. As for the patients and their
family, it is a great inconvenience that their time is wasted.
Process improvement method to overcome this problem is as follows:
1. Setting up a Quality Improvement team to determine process flaws resulting in the delay.
The below cause and effect diagram demonstrates the possible reasons for the delay:
Figure 5: Potential causes of waiting time before surgery-- Source: (Mehmet Tolga Taner, Bulent
Sezen and Jiju Antony, An overview of six sigma applications in healthcare industry, 2007)
Page 17
2. The team develops a process of using a flowchart for admitting patients to hospitals.
The below flowchart clarifies the process for patients admission:
Figure 6: Flowchart of the waiting-time before surgery-- Source: (Mehmet Tolga Taner, Bulent
Sezen and Jiju Antony, An overview of six sigma applications in healthcare industry, 2007)
Page 18
Figure 7: Factors Affecting Image Quality of MRI-- Source: (Mehmet Tolga Taner, Bulent Sezen
and Jiju Antony, An overview of six sigma applications in healthcare industry, 2007)
Page 19
Page 20
Source: (Mehmet Tolga Taner, Bulent Sezen and Jiju Antony, An overview of six sigma
applications in healthcare industry, 2007)
4. This process should be followed by the method of collecting data to measure errors. The
main focus is on equipments, personnel action and procedures to reduce errors. Hence,
two main categories must be determined by the team were the team collecting samples
and the team storing it.
This activity results in development of process in collection of blood samples and storing which
later outcomes in cost reduction.
Page 21
Figure 9: Fishbone diagram for identifying cause for catheter infectionSource: (Mehmet Tolga Taner, Bulent Sezen and Jiju Antony, An overview of six sigma
applications in healthcare industry, 2007)
By identifying the root causes, many arrangements can be taken in order to prevent such
infection, for example: excessive training for staff operating the catheter process and changing
the location where to insert the catheter to reduce the risk of infection. All these improvements
will result in reducing errors while doing the catheter operations which results in reducing the
probabilities of infection occurrences.
Case Study References (Mehmet Tolga Taner, Bulent Sezen and Jiju Antony, An overview of six
sigma applications in healthcare industry, 2007)
Page 22
Conclusions:
Six sigma is a practical operational quality management methodology yet still complex to
implement due to multiple factors topped by the human nature and cultural resistance. The
integration of this methodology into service processes is a challenging operation that involves
various tools and approaches providing a comprehensive management to all organizations
aspects and manpower, which can powerfully result in better service quality level and higher
financial revenues.
The DMAIC methodology in six sigma provides a logical problem resolving approach with its
cause-effect thinking and tools such as the fishbone diagram.
It can be concluded that the Healthcare Industry is still in early stages of introduction to six
sigma. Therefore an optimum solution would also be training and implementation with
assistance from top management. Six sigma for healthcare sector is a convenient and powerful
methodology as it is sensitive to all human and processes elements and approaches an interactive
setting for problem solving in a cost effective system.
The challenges in implementing six sigma until now are undeniable and majorly related to
having the trained staff to implement this methodology when financial position of an
organization might be preventing such expensive investment. It should be taken into
consideration that the investment in improving quality of services processes and outcomes is a
long term benefit to the organization and a transferring tool towards greater profits.
Page 23
References:
Jiju Antony, Six sigma for service processes, Business Process Management Journal Vol.
12 No. 2, 2006 pp. 234-248 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited, [Viewed 14th
November 2013], Available from : < www.emeraldinsight.com/1463-7154.htm>
Behnam Nakhai and Joao S. Neves, The challenges of six sigma in improving service
quality, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management Vol. 26 No. 7, 2009
pp. 663-684 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited, [Viewed 14th November 2013],
Available from : <www.emeraldinsight.com/0265-671X.htm>
Ayon Chakrabarty and Kay Chuan Tan, The current state of six sigma application in
services, Managing Service Quality Vol. 17 No. 2, 2007 pp. 194-208 q Emerald Group
Publishing Limited, [Viewed 14th November 2013], Available from : <
www.emeraldinsight.com/0960-4529.htm>
Sarah Ingle and Willo Roe, Six sigma black belt implementation, The TQM Magazine
Volume 13. Number 4. 2001. pp. 273280, [Viewed 22nd November 2013], Available
from : <http://www.emerald-library.com/ft>
Jiju Antony, Some pros and cons of six sigma: an academic perspective, Volume 16
Number 4 2004 pp. 303-306, [Viewed 22nd November 2013], Available from :
<www.emeraldinsight.com/0954-478X.htm>
Kim M. Henderson and James R. Evans, Successful implementation of Six Sigma:
benchmarking General Electric Company, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol.
7 No. 4, 2000,pp. 260-281, [Viewed 22nd November 2013], Available from:
<http://www.emerald-library.com>
Mehmet Tolga Taner and Bulent Sezen, An overview of six sigma applications in
healthcare industry, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 20 No.
4, 2007 pp. 329-340, [Viewed on 23rd November 2013], Available from: <
www.emeraldinsight.com/0952-6862.htm>
Jung-Lang Cheng, Implementing Six Sigma via TQM improvement: an empirical study
in Taiwan, The TQM Journal, Vol. 20 No. 3, 2008 pp. 182-195, [Viewed on 23rd
November 2013], Available from: <www.emeraldinsight.com/1754-2731.htm>
Andrew Thomas, Richard Barton and Paul Byard, METHODOLOGY AND THEORYDeveloping a Six Sigma maintenance model, Journal of Quality in Maintenance
Engineering, Vol. 14 No. 3, 2008 pp. 262-271, [Viewed on 23rd November 2013],
Available from: <www.emeraldinsight.com/1355-2511.htm>
Page 24
Ton van der Wiele, Jos van Iwaarden and David Power, Six Sigma implementation in
Ireland: the role of multinational Firms, International Journal of Quality & Reliability
Management, Vol. 27 No. 9, 2010 pp. 1054-1066, [Viewed on 23rd November 2013],
Available from: <www.emeraldinsight.com/0265-671X.htm>
Darshak A. Desai and Jiju Antony, An assessment of the critical success factors for Six
Sigma implementation in Indian industries, International Journal of Productivity and
Performance Management, Vol. 61 No. 4, 2012 pp. 426-444, [Viewed on 23rd
November 2013], Available from: <www.emeraldinsight.com/1741-0401.htm>
Ayon Chakraborty and Kay Chuan Tan, Case study analysis of Six Sigma
implementation in service organizations, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 18
No. 6, 2012 pp. 992-1019, [Viewed on 20th November 2013], Available from:
<www.emeraldinsight.com/1463-7154.htm>
Lean Six Sigma & Healthcare - MOROF Presentation 6-27-13, Youtube: MOROForlando,
Jul 17, 2013
Matthew J. Liberatore, Six Sigma in healthcare delivery, International Journal of Health
Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 26 No. 7, 2013, pp. 601-626, [Viewed on 20th November
2013], Available from: <www.emeraldinsight.com/0952-6862.htm>
Peter B. Southard, Charu Chandra and Sameer Kumar, RFID in healthcare: a Six Sigma
DMAIC and simulation case study, International Journal of Health Care Quality
Assurance Vol. 25 No. 4, 2012, pp. 291-321, [Viewed on 20th November 2013],
Available from: <www.emeraldinsight.com/0952-6862.htm>
Mohammad Abdolshah, Rosnah Mohd. Yusuff, Tang Sai Hong, and Md. Yusof b. Ismail,
Overcoming the challenges of implementating Six Sigma in service industries, 2009
International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, [Viewed 14th
November 2013], Available from : < http://www.computer.org/>
Chakraborty, Ayon & Tan, Kay Chuan (2012) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of six
sigma in service organizations. In Aized, Tauseef (Ed.) Total Quality Management and
Six Sigma. InTech, Croatia, pp. 247-286, Queensland University Of Technology,
[Viewed 14th November 2013], Available from : < http://eprints.qut.edu.au/53267/>
Jim Biolos, Six Sigma Meets the Service Economy - Six Sigma: It's Not Just for
Manufacturing, Harvard Management Update, Vol. 7, No. 11, November 2002, Harvard
Business Review, HBS Working Knowledge, [Viewed 14th November 2013], Available
from : http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/3278.html
Loay Sehwail and Camillie De Yong,Six Sigma in Health Care, International Journal for
healthcare quality assurance incorporating leadership in health services, 16/4 [2003] i-v,
[Viewed on 10th November 2013], Available from: www.emeraldinsight.com/13660756.htm
Page 25
Jiju Antony, Frenie Jiju Antony and Maneesh Kumar, Byung Rae Cho, Six sigma in
service organisations Benets, challenges and difculties, common myths, empirical
observations and success factors, International Journal of Quality & Reliability
Management Vol. 24 No. 3, 2007 pp. 294-311 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited,
[Viewed on 1st November 2013], Available from: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0265671X.htm
Alexandros G. Psychogios, Jane Atanasovski, Loukas K. Tsironis, Lean Six Sigma in a
service context A multi-factor application approach in the telecommunications industry,
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management Vol. 29 No. 1, 2012 pp. 122139 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited, [Viewed on 1st November 2013], Available
from: www.emeraldinsight.com/0265-671X.htm
Diana Heckl and Ju rgen Moormann, Michael Rosemann, Uptake and success factors of
Six Sigma in the nancial services industry, Business Process Management Journal Vol.
16 No. 3, 2010 pp. 436-472 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited, [Viewed on 1st
November 2013], Available from: www.emeraldinsight.com/1463-7154.htm
Page 26