Wharton Casebook 2011 Revised2
Wharton Casebook 2011 Revised2
Wharton Casebook 2011 Revised2
Contents
2
Section
Page #
Introduction
Interview Preparation
Practice Cases
26
12 Practice Cases
95
Your objective
Interview:
Fit
Demonstrate fit
- Leadership
- Team-player
- Well-rounded personality
Interview:
Cases
Ace Cases
Gather Info,
Network &
Decide
Apply
Contents
4
Section
Page #
Introduction
Interview Preparation
Practice Cases
26
12 Practice Cases
95
General tips
Other resources
Industry snapshots
The Fit
The Case
Wrap-up
Process
Wait in hospitality suite
with other candidates /
recruiters
Interviewer may
give personal
background
Questions about
resume /
experience
Handshake / greeting
You should
Appear warm,
confident, professional
Convince
interviewer that you
are fit for the firm
Pass the airport
test
Maintain confident,
controlled, upbeat
demeanor
General tips
7
Professional appearance
Preparation
Plenty of pens/pencils
Graph/plain paper
Serviceable portfolio
What is fit?
8
Communication
Leadership/Management
Work under pressure / ability to deal with conflict and ambiguity
Almost every single interview involves at least some fitinterview type questions
Applicants have been turned down from the top consulting
firms for not having cleared the fit portions of interviews
Very basic steps go a long way
Smile
Maintain eye contact
Be honest and heartfelt
Have a succinct story
InterviewStream
Mock fit interviews
Do
Dont
Why Firm X?
Why City Y?
Why consulting?
What is a case?
Go with the flow cases (typical of most firms) You will determine which
areas to explore and lead the discussion, i.e. drive the case
Profitability
Market Entry
Acquisition
Organization
~3 min.
Understand
the question
Listen actively
Ask clarifying questions
Take judicious notes
Organize notes as slides
Formulate an initial
hypothesis about
possible solutions
~1-2 min.
Plan your
approach
~12-15 min.
Probe for
information
~3 min.
Assert a
conclusion
Organize notes as
slides
Make recommendations
and follow them with
supporting evidence
Note conclusions
Select 3 to 5 major
topic areas
Communication
Notes
Be engaging! Enjoy the case problem and work together to solve it!
Body language (eye contact, gestures, posture); smile often but do not overdo it
Facial expressions (Maintain composure at all times)
Write legibly, angle it such that the case-giver can see your work
Use a new page for each theme you are exploring
Circle/box insights for use in recommendations
Math
Ask questions that help clarify the scope of the case and the exact question to be
answered
Draw out as MECE (Mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive) a framework / tree as
possible
Talk about the most important branches first and explain why they may be the key
drivers; dont just follow the sequence in which you wrote them
When asking questions or for more data, preface them with contextual analysis, or
even a hypothesis as to what you expect the data show
When doing math, relate the numbers qualitatively to the case, and identify/verbalize
the takeaways from your analysis
Brainstorm in buckets: If asked to brainstorm, take a minute, identify the broad levers
that can answer the question, and run-riot with ideas. Structure and a logical approach
is always appreciated.
When presenting recommendation take a position! Be concise and top-down in your
recommendation (i.e. recommendation first with supporting arguments, tie in numbers if
possible). Then, mention the risks that invalidate your reasoning
There are an unlimited number of frameworks that can be successfully applied in case
interviews
but knowledge of a few solid frameworks will go a long way (profitability, market
entry, go/no go investment, etc.)
Sample frameworks can be found in the following places:
Wharton, Ross, Stern, Tuck, Kellogg, and other school casebooks available on webcafe
David Ohrvall Crack the Case and Mark Cosentino Case in Point
Your knowledge from management, marketing classes and prior work experience read the
CORE CONNECTOR published by the Wharton Consulting Club too
Cosentino and Ohrvall both offer systems, but these systems are essentially
combinations of individual case-type frameworks
Use what(1) You are comfortable with, and, (2) works for you. Be as original as possible:
DEVELOP A FRAMEWORK THAT IS RELEVANT TO THE CASE PROBLEM QUESTION AND
INDUSTRY!
Some sample frameworks are provided in the next few slides. But these are just meant
to get you started do develop your own frameworks for each case!
Overview
Clients earnings / profits (or bottom-line in Income Statement) has declined or stopped growing
You need to recommend ways to increase profits
Sample
Framework
Market
Revenues
Industry
- Growth (g)
- Revenues (R)
- Profits ()
Competition
- C1 market share (s1)
- C2 market share (s2)
- Etc.
Product mix
- Points of Parity /
difference our
products and
competition prod.
Pricing (P)
- Competitive parity in
prices
- Can we prices?
Volume (Q)
- Whats our market
share?
- Enough capacity to
meet demand?
Costs
Client cost structure
(Fixed / Variable)
- PP&E (Property,
Plant & Equipment)
- Overhead
- SG&A
- Labour
- Materials
- IT / Systems
Benchmarks
- How do our costs
stack up vs. others?
Supplier power
Customer / Channel
Customer Segment
- Which segment do
we serve?
- Are they most
profitable?
Channels
- Current sales mix?
- Are they low-cost
channels?
- Do these channels
attract high margin
customers?
- Incentive structures /
performance
Overview
Client is considering entering a new market. Your goal is to recommend whether or not they should enter it
For these types of cases what is common is that the company is considering spending money to get some kind of
economic return. In addition to seeing whether the decision is financially sound, you have to test:
- Likelihood of implementation success based on industry conditions and firm capabilities
- Do a risk assessment
Sample
Framework
Strategic Logic
Why are they thinking of
market entry?
- Growth?
- Mature current market?
- Response to competitor move?
Resources and capabilities
- What does the firm have that
makes them think they can be
successful?
Brand
Patents
Local expertise/partners
Economics of decision
New market conditions
- Total Revenues (R)
- Total Profits ()
- Growth (g)
Competition in a new market
- C1 market share (s1)
- C2 market share (s2)
- Etc.
Economics
- Investment required
- Expected share of revenues
- Expected share of profits
- Profitable? Payback period?
Risks / Others
Execution/entry barriers?
- Channel access?
- Regulatory barriers?
- Does firm have $ to make
investment?
Risks
- Implementation risk
- Political risks?
- Currency risk?
- Macroeconomic risk?
Overview
Sample
Framework
Strategic Fit
Deal Economics
Risk Assessment
Overview
Sample
Framework
Strategic logic
Decision Economics
Risks / Others
Risks
- Implementation risk? Political risks?
- Currency risk?
Partner capabilities
- Quality of service
- Lead time
- Technology
- Customer service
Stakeholder mgmt.
- Stakeholders job loss issues etc.
- Manage media & community
IMPORTANT: Sometimes interviews might make a difference between Outsourcing and Off-shoring: former refers to functions that are
done outside firms boundaries. Latter refers to outsourced functions done in a distant location such as India or Ireland.
Overview
Sample
Framework
Strategic Rationale
Mission of non-profit
- Health
- Education
- Poverty alleviation
- Etc.
- Response to competitor move?
Stakeholder opinions and likely
reaction
- Donors
- Customers those who benefit
from the non-profits services
- Volunteers
- Paid staff
Deal Economics
Other
Planned investment
- What will it cost?
- Do we have the money?
Required capabilities
- Does non-profit have what it
takes to do this well?
Returns, if any
- Will we be getting back
money?
- Will organization make / lose
money on this?
Risks
- How will media perceive this
decision?
- Critical to factor in
stakeholder reactions will
this alienate donors, volunteers
etc?
Examples
Some
solution
drivers
Strategic
analysis
Economic
analysis
Customers /
channels
Catch-all /
Other
One should broadly follow these steps when giving cases to fellow students
Prepare yourself
Make it real
Ask questions
Remember that there is no one answer to any case! A candidate can be creative enough to take a new approach towards the problem.
Background
Our belief
Important
Warning!
Case interviews span a broad range of industries. You may encounter everything from
Financial Services to Mining to Education to Formula 1
Those of you who have not worked as consultants before will likely not have any
background in most of these industries
This document can give you a very high level view of some typical industries that
cases focus on
You MUST attend the industry primer series led by partners from various firms as they
will capture key insights and latest trends in those industries that tend to be popular in
cases
We believe that having a very basic overview of an industry helps to more
effectively tackle a case
At the very least it helps you construct a framework that is most applicable to that
particular problem context. Examples:
- Consumer goods: branding is an important driver of success
- Pharma: generics manufacturers pose a major competitive threat
Do not attempt to master industry specifics or memorize industry data
You primary objective over the next few weeks/months is to master case-based
problem solving not to become an industry expert
Spending a little time informing yourself about the basics of a few key industries should
improve your problem-solving ability. The following pages will help in this endeavor.
Contents
25
Section
Page #
Introduction
Interview Preparation
Practice Cases
26
12 Practice Cases
95
Case Description
Page #
27
32
35
40
45
50
58
63
69
75
81
88
100 Classes
20 people
maximum
Competitors
People /
class
Market
Evaluation
Revenue
Internal
Price /
person /
class
% of
Capacity
Number of
Teachers
Profit
Salary/
teacher
Cost
Lease
Maintenance
Cost
Question 2a
The profit has decreased substantially in the past 2 years.
2010 Profit of $24,000
2011 Loss of $24,000
If they offered 100 classes/month and charged $10/student, what is the break even point (number of students/
class needed)?
Calculations
Loss of revenue means that # of classes decreased or / and # of students per class decreased
Breakeven Point: Revenue = Cost
Cost = $8,000
Revenue = $8000 = 100 classes x $10/student x # of students / class = $1000 x # of students / class
# of students / class (Breakeven point) = 8 students / class
Question 2b
In 2011, they had a loss of $24,000. What was their average enrollment of students per class? By what
percentage does the yoga studio need to increase enrollment by to breakeven?
Calculations
Losing $2,000 each month ($24,000 / 12)
Revenue is $6,000 per month (-$2,000 = Revenue - $8,000)
Revenue = # of students per class x 100 classes # of students per class = 6 students per class on average
Enrollment Increase: (8-6)/(6) = 33% = Need to increase enrollment by 33% per class on average
Conclusion
Based on your findings, what would you recommend your friend do?
I would advise my friend NOT to acquire this business, especially if she is looking for short-term profit. Just to breakeven
with the variable costs, enrollment needs to increase by 33%. In order to make a profit, the number of students needs to
increase by more than 33%, which is difficult in a short time span and in a small community where many yoga studios
already exist. There may also be high switching costs if people have already purchased annual yoga passes. The friend
would also need to invest a large amount of money initially to purchase the business from the current owner (fixed cost),
making it even more unlikely that the friend will be able to earn money from entering this deal.
Synergies evaluation
Overhead savings of $20MM per year
Logistics savings of $20 / metric ton
Market Assessment
Prices declining, expected to reach
$800 / metric ton in 3 years
Recommendation
It seems that the decreasing demand and increasing competition will be driving down
prices.
The expected annual profit of the plant will be $24MM, out of which $40MM of
synergies from cost savings.
Given that the cost of the plant is $750MM, it seems like a very high price to pay.
Expensed Costs
Information to provide:
Average variable costs(2) = $40,000 for a round trip flight
Fixed costs (excluding price of plane)(3) = $3M / year
Calculation:
Annual variable costs = Cost / round trip * Days operational = $40,000 x 300 = $12M
Total annual costs = variable costs + fixed costs = $12M + $3M = $15M
Payback Period
Information to provide:
Cost of purchasing a new plane (capital investment) = $75
Calculation:
Payback period = Capital investment / Annual profit = $75M / $15M = 5 years
Questions / Answers
Optional mini-questions:
1. Why would the days operational per year be
300 days instead of 365? It is impossible for
planes to be utilized all the time due to
controllable factors (scheduled maintenance)
and uncontrollable factors (weather).
2. What are some examples of variable costs for
this case? Fuel, on-board labor, food/drinks
3. What are some examples of fixed costs for this
case? Gate fees, terminal labor, insurance
Main question:
Does the investment meet Zirgins corporate
investment criteria? Yes, on a standalone economic
basis, purchasing a new plane should generate a 5
year payback period assuming no growth/decline in
demand or in pricing. This is below the companys
target of a 6 year payback. The useful life factors
into this analysis because, in order for the service to
continue, the company will have to buy a new plane
in 25 years. However, since this useful life is fairly
long, the route will payback the initial investment 5x
before a new plane is required.
Questions / Answers
1. Is leasing a new plane economically profitable for Zirgin Atlantic? Yes. If Zirgin decides to lease a plane, then they will generate a profit of
$5M a year without having to buy a new plane.
2. What are the financial and risk implications of buying a new plane versus leasing a plane? If Zirgin buys a plane, the company needs to
invest $75M in order to generate $15M a year, or $375M total over the 25 year useful life of the plane. On the other hand, if the company leases
a plane instead, then the company generates $5M a year without the heavy initial investment. Just looking at pure numbers, the company will
generate a lot more overall profit in a long period of time by buying a new plane. However, buying a plane also encompasses more risks. First,
the purchase of a new plane increases the PP&E/asset base of the company, which some investors may be wary about. Second, if the company
buys a plane and the route ends up being unsustainable, then the company needs to resell the plane or use it for another route. Leasing a plane
presents a much more attractive exit option. Third, buying a plane requires significant initial capital and depending on the financial strength of the
company, Zirgin may want to conserve this capital for other means. This capital can also be used for other projects that may generate even
better returns.
2. Synergies with other routes: The new route may provide both
revenue and cost synergies when combined with existing
operations. On the revenue side, a new direct route could mean
new alternatives for transferring passengers (which could mean
additional demand for other routes). On the cost side, the new route
can share administrative and labor costs with existing operations.
Adults: $15
Children: $10
Panda costs:
Acquisition: $890,000
Transportation: $335,000
Maintenance: $300,000/annual
Enclosure: $1.475M
Panda Consultant: $200,000
After buying a panda, the San Diego zoo increase
their number of visitor by 12% (and maintained this
number from then)
Math (1 Panda)
Adults
Children
Tickets
300,000
300,000
+
12%
336,000
336,000
Incremental
36,000
36,000
Cost
per
<cket
15
10
Incremental
revenues
$
540,000
$
360,000
t0
Ini:al
Investment
Acquisi<on
Transporta<on
Enclosure
t1
=>
future
$
900,000
Incremental
revenues
Ini<al
Investment
$
(2,700,000)
$
(300,000)
CF
$
(2,700,000)
$
600,000
NPV
=
-$2.7M
+
($0.6M/.20)
NPV
(1
panda)
$
300,000
(2,700,000)
(890,000)
(335,000)
(1,475,000)
Partial Conclusion & Next Question (Would it be a good investment to buy 2 pandas?)
Since the NPV is positive, it seems to be a good investment.
If it is a good investment, what if the zoo decides to buy a second panda? Would it be a good idea?
And what else could happen if they buy 2 pandas? (Imagine they can procreate and there is a 90% chance the zoo could sell the baby
panda next year) Would it be a good investment to buy 2 pandas?
Ini:al
Investment
Acquisi<on
Transporta<on
Enclosure
t0
t1
=>
future
Incremental
revenues
$
750,000
Ini<al
Investment
$
(2,700,000)
$
(300,000)
CF
$
(2,700,000)
$
450,000
NPV
=
-$2.7M
+
($0.45M/.20)
NPV
(panda
2)
$
(450,000
)
Sale
of
baby
panda
=
-$0.89M
*
(90%)
Sale
of
baby
panda
$801,000
NPV
(baby
panda)
=
0.801/1.20
NPV
(baby
panda)
$
667,500
NPV
(panda2+baby
panda)
=
-$2.7M
+
($0.45M/.20)
+
(0.801/1.20)
NPV
(panda2+baby
panda)
$
217,500
(2,700,000)
(890,000)
(335,000)
(1,475,000)
Ini:al
Investment
Acquisi<on
Transporta<on
Enclosure
t0
t1
=>
future
Incremental
revenues
$
840,000
Ini<al
Investment
$
(2,700,000)
$
(300,000)
CF
$
(2,700,000)
$
540,000
NPV
=
-$2.7M
+
($0.54M/.20)
NPV
(panda
2)
$
0
Sale
of
baby
panda
=
-$0.89M
*
(90%)
Sale
of
baby
panda
$801,000
NPV
(baby
panda)
=
0.801/1.20
NPV
(baby
panda)
$
667,500
NPV
(panda2+baby
panda)
=
-$2.7M
+
($0.54M/.20)
+
(0.801/1.20)
NPV
(panda2+baby
panda)
$
667,500
(2,700,000)
(890,000)
(335,000)
(1,475,000)
Question
Recommendation
Risks
Not procreating
Life expectancy: biggest risk, significant value of the PV is driven by the assumption of
perpetuity
Concurrency (other zoos actions)
Not reaching target of incremental revenues (amount of tickets)
The current analyses are based on one single factor, increased visitors, in generating value. The
zoo should also explore other revenue sources to the acquisition of panda to mitigate the risk.
Increase revenues through merchandise related to pandas
Next Steps
How would you approach this question and what would you recommend him?
The candidate should :
Understand the problem and what 5% EBITA means
Explore the industry (introduction of new technology), competitors (2 big players), and sales channel (distribution)
Focus next on how to increase revenues, then how to improve profitability (reducing costs)
Market
($1B)
Client
($25M)
Old
technology
90%
(900M)
40%
(10M)
New
technology
10%
(100M)
60%
(15M)
The candidate should ask what is the current cost, and write down
a cost structure.
By how much do they need to reduce costs?
The candidate should explore options to improve costs. However
since the client would need to reduce costs almost by 45% (from
$2,660 to $1,440= $1,220), the candidate should come with the
idea of outsourcing production or moving it to another country.
Where could they produce (which countries)?... Mexico, China and
Malaysia. Provide information upon request (see math in next
page).
Price
Total COGS
Current Situation
$ 2,800
Proposal
$ 1,800
$ 2,240
$ 1,170
Materials
60%
$ 1,344
Labor
15%
$ 336
Overhead
25%
$ 560
$ 420
EBITA
$140
TOTAL COST
5%
$ 2,660
Price
Variable Cost
Materials savings
Materials
Cost per hour
Labor
$ 270
20%
$ 360
$ 1,440
US
China
Mexico Malasya
$ 2,800 $ 1,800 $ 1,800 $ 1,800
$ 2,240 $
993 $ 1,066 $
892
$
1,344 $
15
336 $
Overhead savings
Overhead
Distribution
Fixed costs
TOTAL COST
EBITA
50%
50%
70%
672 $
672 $
403
45 $
60%
$
560 $
$
- $
$
420 $
$ 2,660 $
$
140 $
224
50
270
1,263
537
90 $
50%
$
$
$
$
$
280
20
270
1,336
464
45
30%
$
$
$
$
$
392
50
270
1,162
638
We only have a few data on the target: total annual sales $800m, 800 stores, 4 brands on both the urban and suburban markets.
The PE fund hired us to help them do the due diligence of the firm, in order to assess if its worth bidding for it or not.
How would you approach this question and what would you recommend him?
This is similar to a strategy case, in which you have to assess the market opportunities, competition, and the companies competitive
advantage.
In a real due diligence project in consulting firm, the project team will develop framework and identify key areas to assess, and then ask
questions to the target. Therefore, an ideal candidate in this case interview should be able to come up with a framework that is
appropriate to assess a clothing retail company, and be able to ask relevant questions in each aspect.
The format of this interview is largely driven by the interviewer. However, an ideal candidate should be able to drive insights and
implication on each question asked by the interviewer, and used those to form a view and the conclusion
How would you approach this question and what would you recommend him?
This is a competitive strategy case.
For the first part, the interviewer should diagnose the root cause of share loss by understanding changes in both market size and the
clients volume (Vol. Share = Vol. / Market Size) in South China region. After realizing that the share loss is primarily driven by Market
Size increase due to a disruptive innovation brought by a new local competitor, the interviewer should guide the discussion on whether this
is a real competitive threat given the clients volume had been relatively stable and their user base intact.
For the second part, interviewer should guide creative thoughts on innovation, supply chain management and sales/marketing strategies
to react to the situation. This is the fun part and the interviewee can recommend several strategic choices in both short term and long term.
Case Type: Competitive strategy case / innovation
Case Style: Guided in part 1, open end in part 2
PLD
South China
60%
Volume
120,000
National
40%
Volume
800,000
WWT
20%
40,000
10%
200,000
DLT
20%
40,000
5%
100,000
Total
200,000
2,000,000
The discussion begins with some overview of the hospital industry, particularly where a hospitals earnings come from.
Answer any questions related to the industry either with specific information from the following discussion points, from personal
knowledge, or just state that they are irrelevant to the case but assumptions can be made.
Health reform is a good discussion to have, but unnecessary for the case.
2. Earnings Calculation
After discussing revenues and costs, give the candidate the attached revenue and costs charts.
Once the cause of the earnings decrease is known, talk about some solutions to the problem.
8,000
7,000
6,000
Dollars
5,000
Patients w/ public
insurance
Uninsured patients
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
2004
2005
2006
2007
Year
2008
2009
2010
Question
Given the attached chart, what was the operating margin for the
hospital in 2004 and what is it in 2010?
Calculations
2004: Average per patient revenue for all patients = 6,800*(50%)
+ 5,300*(40%) + 3,300*(10%) = $5,850. Margin = (Rev-Costs)/Rev
= ($5,850-4,000)/$5,850 = 31.6%
2010: Average per patient revenue for all patients = 6,300*(50%)
+ 3,700*(40%) + 3,300*(10%) = $4,960. Margin = (Rev-Costs)/Rev
= ($4,960-4,800)/$4,960 = 3.2%
Actual number of patients do not matter as we are just looking for
margin
Assumptions/rounding can be made, adjust answers accordingly
Question
Given the answer to the first question, what would you recommend
the hospital do?
Suggested Strategies
Revenue:
Charge more for services (could partner with
other hospitals in state when negotiating
reimbursement rates)
Attract more high margin private insurance
patients via advertising, etc.
Acquire, joint venture, or do some sort of
corporate development with local specialty clinic
that serves private insurance patients with high
reimbursement
Lobby the government to raise public
reimbursement rates
Costs:
Buy supplies for less (could partner with other
hospitals in state when negotiating prices)
Attract lower cost patients with selective
advertising, etc. (e.g. target young rather than old,
etc)
Find efficiencies/synergies somewhere with a
purchase of a clinic
Part 1: The candidate should create the following framework to determine why profits are declining
EXTERNAL
Is the market growing or shrinking?
Who are the competitors?
What is happening in the economy?
Are there any factors that are
impacting our clients? For example,
diet changes
What factors influence our customers
purchasing?
FINANCIAL
Are costs increasing? Cost breakdown
Are revenues declining?
What are our prices? How do they
compare to our competitors?
Do we have promotions and discounts
and how are these impacting our sales
volume and margins?
What has our competitors been doing
to market and develop their products?
How do our products compare to our
competitors?
INTERNAL
What is our product mix?
Is it mismatched with the market?
Additional information
An excellent candidate will look at both the external and financial factors before moving to the internal factors. This candidate will also
lead the interviewer from one bucket to the other and address most of the points under each bucket. An excellent candidate will also ask
for cost information, as this is a profitability issue.
DELI
$6
SUPERMARKETS
$7
-Raw Materials
-SG&A
$3
$4
$3
$0.50
Calculations
The candidate should calculate that delis have an average product loss of
$6-($3+$4) = ($1) and Supermarkets have an average profit of $7($3+$0.50) = $3.50
At this point, the candidate should ask for competitor information and
quantities sold for supermarkets. If the candidate asks for quantities sold
for deli, remind the candidate that the revenues were given before and
were $120 million. Candidate should realize that quantity is 20 million.
The supermarkets section sells 10 million units (provided by interviewer).
Deli Loss:
Option 1: Deli Loss = $120 million (given at the start of the problem)
($7*20 million) = $20 million
Option 2: Deli Loss = 20 million * $1 (Loss calculated above) = $20
million
Supermarket Profit:
Option 1: Supermarket Profit = $7*10 million [($3+$0.50)*10 million]
= $35 million
Option 2: Supermarket Profit = $3.50 *10 million = $35 million
Additional Information
The candidate should conclude that the Eat Co is making profits from the supermarket division but the deli section is a loss maker. Eat Cos
total revenue is $190 million but its profits are $15 million.
The candidate should suggest that the Eat Co consider (1) decreasing costs in the deli section and (2) re-focusing on the supermarket
section. Finally, the candidate should say that the deli section provides the drag on the companys profitability even though deli products
generates more revenues than supermarket products.
An excellent candidate will ask for (1) competitor information and (ii) calculate total profit/loss for each section and for the both sections.
The candidate should ask for competitor information. If interviewee, doesnt ask for it then provide it to the interviewee.
SUPERMARKETS
$8
$3
$2.50
20 million
Calculations
The candidate should calculate the competitor profits
Recommendation
I would recommend that Eat Co looks at (i) aligning its costs with competitors in the deli products segment, this will generate additional
profit of $90 million instead of its loss of $20 million and (ii) developing its distribution to supermarkets as Eat Co has only 7% of the
market and sells 50% less than its competitors in this segment. An increase of 20% in sales in this segment will increase profits by $7
million. The risk is that competitors will retaliate to Eat Cos attempts to increase its market share in the supermarket section and there
are risks to product quality when aligning costs with competitors if it compromises Eat Cos product quality. The next step would be to
look more closely at cost reduction options in the deli section and how to gain share in the supermarket segment.
An excellent candidate will drive the case, and make accurate calculations while coming up with conclusions to move the case forward. This
candidate creates a thorough framework and needs little prompting from one step to the next. The candidate recognizes that Eat Co has
under-developed opportunity in the supermarket segment based on the quantitative work and see that deli section can be re-tooled to
increase overall profitability. The candidate makes a thorough conclusion using information in the case and provides next steps.
A good candidate is able to generate ideas and move the case forward with logical though not in-depth calculations. The candidate is also
able to work through the math.
Flavored Non-sparkling
Water Market by Product
12%
Sparkling
Others
18%
90%
NonSparkling
Easy Drink
70%
O2
Math
$400,000 / 10 cent profit per bottle = 4 million bottles need to be sold to breakeven
The interviewee should note that 4 million bottles is larger than the entire annual market for such products, so it will take
a few years to reach this amount (assuming there is no change in the overall market size).
The interviewee should determine a reasonable market share goal. The important thing is not to come up with an exact
market share target, but to back up whatever assumption s/he makes with logical reasoning. For example, here is a
possible thought process:
Since the new entrant is a major company, it should have strong brand name power and distribution networks.
Since the other main competitors have 12% and 18% and our product is backed by a strong company, our
company will come in somewhere in that range. Let s use the mid-point 15% as an estimate.
15% of 3.2 million bottles = 480,000 bottles to sell per year approximately 0.5 million bottles
4 million bottles to breakeven / .5 million bottles it will take approximately 8 years to breakeven
Candidate should note that 8 years is an eternity in a market like beverages where new beverages emerge
constantly and trends change quickly
Percentage of Respondents
Supplier Map:
Retailer Map:
Question
A third party operator has approached our client with the following offer: They will install a website based platform to manage the
inventory and will reduce the inventory in the Chicago warehouse by 50%, and reduce inventory holding costs by 10%. The third party
will charge $5MM for this website. Should our client accept this deal?
Calculation
Benefits/Costs Analysis
Benefits:
Inventory: Save $8.5 Million ($17MM x 50%)
Inventory Holding Costs: Save .1MM/Year ($1MM x
10%)
Total Savings: $8.6MM
Costs: $5MM
Benefits in the first year outweigh the costs, and benefits will
continue to be realized in the future
The interviewee should also mention that there are other options
as better firms or doing this internally which can even bring in
more benefits
Recommendation
Interviewee should mention the following:
Client should optimize its corporate marketing and field sales mix in terms of marketing materials
Client should also consider moving/adding warehouses, but a cost/benefit analysis should be conducted
Client should go ahead with a website based platform to optimize its supply chain but should also look at other options available
Interviewee should also mention any risks such as added cost of changing warehouses and risk of investing in a third party operator
of their supply chain
13%
Chicago
12%
37%
28%
10%
7%
Chicago
27%
20%
28%
18%
Introduction / Context
Our client is Office Supply Stores (OSS), a national office products company with revenue in excess of $7 billion in its last
fiscal year. OSS sells various office supplies and services, business machines and related products, and office furniture
under national and private label brands. It also provides high-speed, color and self-service copying, other printing services,
faxing, and shipping services. The company operates approximately 1,000 brick-and-mortar stores in the United States and
Canada, an e-commerce division and catalog business. OSS has more than 12 million customers, comprising of small,
medium and large businesses as well as individual consumers.
Over the past two years, Office Supply Stores has been experiencing declining profitability. The CEO has retained our firm
to help determine what is causing the problem and how OSS might address those problems.
What key areas would you want to explore in order to understand OSSs decline in profitability?
qMarket
qIndustry (industry has seen decline in revenues, profits and/or growth)
qCompetition (more competition, such as online or new players, has reduced market share and revenue)
qRevenue
qProduct Mix (poor merchandising, sales in high margin services have declined faster than lower margin products)
qVolume (sales have decreased, client is losing market share to existing competition or new entrants)
qPrice (discounting in response to competition, increased markdowns)
qCosts
qManagement/Overhead (too many middle managers, higher SG&A costs as percent of sales, distribution costs)
qStore Operations (increases in store rent, labor costs, shrinkage/theft, renovations in store)
qCost of goods sold (lower gross margins, price increases from suppliers, higher transportation costs)
qCustomers/Channels
qSegments (losing more profitable customers, change in mix of business and personal customers)
qChannels (sales decline in stores and catalog, more customers shopping online, Amazon)
Discuss possible solutions to the decline in profitability at OSS. Feel free to offer hypothesis.
qIncrease Revenue
qInvest in online, mobile and multi-channel platforms to respond to changes in customers channel preference
qSegment customers and hire dedicated sales team to target business customers
qImprove product mix and add higher margin services
qIncrease private label products to improve margins and reduce supplier bargaining power
qImprove inventory management (avoid lost sales due to out of stocks and markdowns)
qEvaluate price increases on niche products
qExplore other sources of store revenue, such as offering national brands for store-within-a-store, increasing supplierpaid promotions and leasing parts of the store to complementary retailers (coffee, fast food)
qReduce Costs
qReduce fixed costs, such as management/administration, SG&A costs and other overhead (management and store)
qRe-negotiate leases with landlords
qWork with suppliers to reduce product costs, find savings in distribution and/or offer special promotions
qSKU rationalization (discontinue poor selling items and concentrate on best sellers)
qClose underperforming stores
qOther
qConsider M&A opportunities
Segment
# of customers
(in thousands)
Large business
15
Medium business
Small business
Individual consumers
Average
purchases
10,000 /quarter
15%
50
5,000 /quarter
15%
300
2,500 /quarter
20%
250 /year
35%
12,000
Frequency
Avg gross
margin
Using Exhibit 1, what is the contribution margin of all segments (in dollars and percentage terms)?
(OPTIONAL FOLLOW-UP) What is the share of sales and profit of one or more segments?
Segment
# of customers
(in thousands)
Average
purchases
Medium business
50
5,000 /quarter
15%
1,000,000
150,000
300
2,500 /quarter
20%
3,000,000
600,000
250 /year
35%
3,000,000
1,050,000
7,600,000
1,890,000
12,000
Total
12,365
15% $
600,000
Contribution
margin (in
thousands)
15
Individual consumers
10,000 /quarter
Annual sales
(in thousands)
Large business
Small business
Frequency
Avg gross
margin
90,000
Other than profit, what other factors would you consider before choosing a segment to target?
qMarket size, growth potential, trends, current market share and historical data of each segment
qCustomer acquisition costs
qInternal capability and investments/costs required to serve the segment
qCustomer lifetime value (CLV) and retention (business customers may face higher switching costs and be less price
sensitive than small businesses and individuals)
qAbility to upsell services and increase sales to customers in the segment
Based on your analysis, what segment would you recommend OSS target?
Feel free to make hypothesis on the other issues noted in the previous question.
qLarge & Medium Businesses
qBenefits: Larger recurring orders, lower cost to serve (as percent of sales), do not require brick-and-mortar stores
(lower costs), opportunity to upsell service contracts/warranties
qRisks: Investments in dedicated national sales team, low margin, competitive, smaller population compared to small
businesses and individuals
qSmall Businesses
qBenefits: Recurring orders, low cost to serve (as percent of sales), opportunity to upsell service contracts/warranties,
better margin than medium and large businesses
qRisks: Investment in dedicated sales team, require more upfront investment to find
qIndividual Consumers
qBenefits: Large population, high margin, multi-channel benefit (store/online)
qRisks: Harder to retain (low switching costs, price sensitive), may prefer online (Amazon), require more service (as
percent of sales)
*** Any answer is acceptable. It is more important to discuss the benefits and risks with targeting one or more segments.
Based on what we have discussed, and any other ideas you have on improving OSSs profitability,
what would you recommend to OSSs CEO? Please provide at least 2-3 recommendations.
qReiterate one or more segments to target, including a discussion of the benefits, risks and next steps (execution)
qDiscuss ideas discussed in Q1 and corresponding solutions proposed in Q2 with similar structure
qRevenue: Invest in multi-channel platforms, improve product and service mix, etc.
qCosts: Reduce overhead, SKU rationalization, close stores, etc.
qRecognize the macro challenges facing brick-and-mortar businesses, such as office supply, electronics and book stores
*** Any answer is acceptable. It is more important to provide the elements of a good answer.
Sample Recommendation/Answer
qTarget small and medium businesses
qExecution: Hire dedicated local sales team, pilot in small markets, expand sales team into larger markets,
find products/services to upsell to increase margins
qBenefits: Recurring orders, opportunity to increase current sales through upselling, better margins than larger
businesses, lowers cost to serve (as percent of sales), easier to target than individual customers
qRisks: Investment in dedicated sales team and acquiring small business customers, lose sales and profit from other
customers (large businesses, individuals), competition
qOther recommendations
qInvest in online, mobile and multi-channel platforms
qImprove product mix and add higher margin services; increase private label products to improve margins
qRe-negotiate leases with landlords
qWork with suppliers to reduce product costs, find savings in distribution and/or offer special promotions
qSKU rationalization (discontinue poor selling items and concentrate on best sellers)
qClose underperforming stores
qConsider M&A opportunities
q BONUS: Recognize the macro challenges facing brick-and-mortar businesses
Contents
93
Section
Page #
Introduction
Interview Preparation
Practice Cases
26
12 Practice Cases
95
Firm Name
Link to Case
McKinsey
http://www.mckinsey.com/Careers/Apply/Interview_tips/
Practice_case_studies
Bain
http://www.joinbain.com/apply-to-bain/interview-preparation/
default.asp
BCG
http://www.bcg.com/join_bcg/practice_cases/default.aspx
Oliver Wyman
http://www.oliverwyman.com/careers/61.htm
AT Kearney
http://www.atkearney.be/index.php/Join-us/preparation.html
Please see the Wharton Consulting Club webcafe for more casebooks from
prior years and other schools
https://webcafe.wharton.upenn.edu/eRoom/mba/consultclub/0_8cde4