FTFS Chap20 P032
FTFS Chap20 P032
20-32 A fluid flows through a pipe in calm ambient air. The pipe is heated electrically. The thickness of the
insulation needed to reduce the losses by 85% and the money saved during 10-h are to be determined.
Assumptions 1 Steady operating conditions exist. 2 Air is an ideal gas with constant properties. 3 The local
atmospheric pressure is 1 atm.
Properties Insulation will drop the outer surface temperature to a value close to the ambient temperature,
and possible below it because of the very low sky temperature for radiation heat loss. For convenience, we
use the properties of air at 1 atm and 5C (the anticipated film temperature) (Table A-22),
k 0.02401 W/m.C
Tsky = -30C
1.382 10 5 m 2 /s
Pr 0.7350
1
1
0.003597 K -1
Tf
(5 273) K
T = 0C
= 0.1
D + 2tins
Asphalt
Insulation
L = 100 m
(1 0.85)Q
Q
no insulation 0.15 29,094 W 4364 W
25C
The amount of energy and money insulation will save during a 10-h period is simply determined from
Q saved ,total Q
saved t ( 0.85 29.094 kW)(10 h) 247.3 kWh
Money saved ( Energy saved)(Unit cost of energy) = ( 247.3 kWh )($0.09 / kWh ) $22.26
The
characteristic
length
in
this
case
is
the
outer
diameter
of
the
insulated
pipe,
Lc D 2tinsul 0.3 2tinsul where tinsul is the thickness of insulation in m. Then the problem can be
Ra
g (T s T ) L3c
Pr
0.387 Ra 1 / 6
Nu 0.6
1 0.559 / Pr 9 / 16
(1.382 10 5 m 2 /s ) 2
2
8 / 27
0.387 Ra 1 / 6
0.6
1 0.559 / 0.7350 9 / 16
(0.7350)
8 / 27
k
0.02401 W/m.C
Nu
Nu
Lc
Lc
As D0 L (0.3 2t insul )(100 m)
h
The total rate of heat loss from the outer surface of the insulated pipe by convection and radiation becomes
2kL(Ttank Ts )
Q Q insulation
ln( Do / D )
4364 W
The solution of all of the equations above simultaneously using an equation solver gives Ts = 281.5 K =
8.5C and tinsul = 0.013 m = 1.3 cm.
Note that the film temperature is (8.5+0)/2 = 4.25C which is very close to the assumed value of
5C. Therefore, there is no need to repeat the calculations using properties at this new film temperature.
20-26
L = 13 ft
k 0.01546 Btu/h.ft. F
0.1851 10 3 ft 2 /s
Furnace
D = 8 ft
= 0.1
Pr 0.7249
1
1
0.001762 R -1
Tf
(107.5 460) R
Analysis The solution of this problem requires a trial-and-error approach since the determination of the
Rayleigh number and thus the Nusselt number depends on the surface temperature which is unknown. We
start the solution process by guessing the surface temperature to be 140F for the evaluation of the
properties and h. We will check the accuracy of this guess later and repeat the calculations if necessary. The
characteristic length in this case is the outer diameter of the furnace, Lc D 8 ft. Then,
g (Ts T ) D 3
Ra
Pr
0.387 Ra 1 / 6
Nu 0.6
1 0.559 / Pr 9 / 16
(0.1851 10
2
8 / 27
ft /s )
0.387(3.996 1010 )1 / 6
0.6
1 0.559 / 0.7249 9 / 16
8 / 27
376.9
k
0.01546 Btu/h.ft.F
Nu
(376.9) 0.7287 Btu/h.ft 2 .F
D
8 ft
As DL (8 ft )(13 ft ) 326.7 ft 2
h
Q
gen (0.82)( 48 therms/h)(100,000 Btu/therm) 3.936 10 Btu/h
Noting that 1% of the heat generated can be dissipated by natural convection and radiation ,
(0.01)(3.936 10 6 Btu/h) 39,360 Btu/h
Q
The total rate of heat loss from the furnace by natural convection and radiation can be expressed as
Ts 601.8 R 141.8F
which is very close to the assumed value. Therefore, there is no need to repeat calculations.
The total amount of heat loss and its cost during a-2800 hour period is
Q
Q
t (39,360 Btu/h )( 2800 h) 1.102 10 8 Btu
total
total
20-27
Glass
Ts = 5C
Room
T = 25C
= 0.9
L = 1.2 m
k 0.02476 W/m.C
1.471 10 5 m 2 /s
Outdoors
-5C
Pr 0.7323
1
1
0.003472 K -1
Tf
(15 273)K
Analysis (a) The characteristic length in this case is the height of the window, Lc L 1.2 m. Then,
Ra
g (T Ts ) L3c
Pr
(1.471 10
Nu 0.825
8 / 27
9 / 16
0.492
Pr
m /s )
(0.7323) 3.986 10 9
0.387 Ra 1 / 6
0.825
0.387(3.986 10 9 ) 1 / 6
0.492
0.7323
9 / 16
189.7
8 / 27
k
0.02476 W/m.C
Nu
(189.7) 3.915 W/m 2 .C
L
1.2 m
As (1.2 m)(2 m) 2.4 m 2
h
(b) The sum of the natural convection and radiation heat transfer from the room to the window is
Q
hA (T T ) (3.915 W/m 2 .C)(2.4 m 2 )(25 5)C 187.9 W
convection
Q radiation As (Tsurr 4 Ts 4 )
(0.9)(2.4 m 2 )(5.67 10 8 W/m 2 .K 4 )[(25 273 K ) 4 (5 273 K ) 4 ] 234.3 W
Q
total Q convection Q radiation 187.9 234.3 422.2 W
(c) The outer surface temperature of the window can be determined from
kAs
Q total
(Ts ,i Ts ,o )
t
T s , o T s ,i
Q total t
(346 W )(0.006 m )
5C
3.65C
kAs
(0.78 W/m.C)(2.4 m 2 )
Then the combined natural convection and radiation heat transfer coefficient on the outer window surface becomes
or
Q
total hcombined As (T s ,o T ,o )
Q
346 W
total
hcombined
20.35 W/m 2 .C
2
As (Ts ,o T ,o )
(2.4 m )[3.65 (5)]C
and thus the thermal resistance R of a layer is proportional to the temperature drop
Note that T QR
across that layer. Therefore, the fraction of thermal resistance of the glass is equal to the ratio of the
temperature drop across the glass to the overall temperature difference,
R glass
R total
Tglass
TR total
5 3.65
0.045 (or 4.5%)
25 ( 5)
which is low. Thus it is reasonable to neglect the thermal resistance of the glass.
20-28
Ts
Air
T = 30C
= 0.9
1.702 10 5 m 2 /s
D = 6 mm
Pr 0.7255
1
1
0.003195 K -1
Tf
(40 273) K
Resistance
heater
L = 12 m
Analysis The solution of this problem requires a trial-and-error approach since the determination of the
Rayleigh number and thus the Nusselt number depends on the surface temperature which is unknown. We
start the solution process by guessing the surface temperature to be 50C for the evaluation of the
properties and h. We will check the accuracy of this guess later and repeat the calculations if necessary. The
characteristic length in this case is the outer diameter of the insulated wire Lc = D = 0.006 m. Then,
Ra
g (Ts T ) D 3
Pr
0.387 Ra 1 / 6
Nu 0.6
1 0.559 / Pr 9 / 16
(1.702 10 5 m 2 /s ) 2
2
8 / 27
0.387(339.3)1 / 6
0 .6
1 0.559 / 0.7255 9 / 16
8 / 27
(0.7255) 339.3
2.101
k
0.02662 W/m.C
Nu
(2.101) 9.327 W/m 2 .C
D
0.006 m
As DL (0.006 m)(12 m) 0.2262 m 2
h
The rate of heat generation, and thus the rate of heat transfer is
Q VI (8 V)(10 A) 80 W
Considering both natural convection and radiation, the total rate of heat loss can be expressed as
T s 52.6C
which is close to the assumed value of 50C. Then the temperature at the interface of the wire and the
plastic cover in steady operation becomes
Q ln( D 2 / D1 )
(80 W ) ln(6 / 3)
2kL
(Ti T s ) Ti T s
52.6C +
57.5C
ln( D 2 / D1 )
2kL
2 (0.15 W/m.C)(12 m )
20-29
Air
T = 20C
Ts = 170C
= 0.7
k 0.0306 W/m.C
2.252 10 5 m 2 /s
D =6.03 cm
Steam
Pr 0.7121
1
1
0.002717 K -1
Tf
(95 273)K
L = 60 m
Analysis The characteristic length in this case is the outer diameter of the pipe, Lc D 0.0603 m .
Then,
g (Ts T ) D 3
Ra
Pr
0.387 Ra 1 / 6
Nu 0.6
1 0.559 / Pr 9 / 16
(2.252 10 5 m 2 /s ) 2
2
8 / 27
0.387(1.231 10 6 ) 1 / 6
0.6
1 0.559 / 0.7121 9 / 16
8 / 27
(0.7121) 1.231 10 6
15.42
k
0.0306 W/m.C
Nu
(15.42) 7.823 W/m 2 .C
D
0.0603 m
As DL (0.0603 m)(60 m) 11 .37 m 2
h
Then the total rate of heat transfer by natural convection and radiation becomes
4
hA (T T ) A (T 4 T
Q
)
s
surr
Q gas
t
Q
27.388 kJ/s 1 therm
0.78
105,500 kJ
Cost (10,496 therms/yr)($0.538 / therm) $5647/yr
20-30
20-31
40000
8000
35000
7000
Cost
30000
Q [W]
Cost [$]
2399
2597
2799
3007
3220
3438
3661
3890
4124
4364
4609
4859
5116
5378
5646
5920
6200
6486
6778
7077
7382
6000
25000
5000
Q
20000
4000
15000
3000
10000
100
120
140
160
Ts [C]
20-32
180
2000
200
Cost [$]
Ts [C]
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
150
155
160
165
170
175
180
185
190
195
200
= 0.1
Air
T = 20C
k 0.0257 W/m.C
1.584 10 5 m 2 /s
D =16.03 cm
Steam
Pr 0.7289
1
1
0.003328 K -1
Tf
( 27.5 273) K
Insulation
L = 60 m
170C, = 0.1
Analysis Insulation will drop the outer surface temperature to a value close to the ambient temperature. The
solution of this problem requires a trial-and-error approach since the determination of the Rayleigh number
and thus the Nusselt number depends on the surface temperature which is unknown. We start the solution
process by guessing the outer surface temperature to be 35C for the evaluation of the properties and h.
We will check the accuracy of this guess later and repeat the calculations if necessary. The characteristic
length in this case is the outer diameter of the insulated pipe, Lc D 0.1603 m. Then,
Ra
g (Ts T ) D 3
Pr
0.387 Ra 1 / 6
Nu 0.6
1 0.559 / Pr 9 / 16
(1.584 10
2
8 / 27
m /s )
0.387(5.856 10 6 )1 / 6
0.6
1 0.559 / 0.7289 9 / 16
k
0.0257 W/m.C
Nu
(24.23) 3.884 W/m 2 .C
D
0.1603 m
As DL (0.1603 m)(60 m) 30.22 m 2
8 / 27
(0.7289) 5.856 10 6
24.23
Then the total rate of heat loss from the outer surface of the insulated pipe by convection and radiation
becomes
Q Q conv Q rad hAs (Ts T ) As (T s 4 T surr 4 )
T Ts
Ts.i Ts
(170 Ts )C
Q Q insulation s.i
2039 W
ln( D 2 / D1 )
ln(16.03 / 6.03)
Rins
2 (0.038 W/m.C)(60 m )
2kL
It gives 30.8C for the surface temperature, which is somewhat different than the assumed value of 35C.
Repeating the calculations with other surface temperatures gives
1988 W
T s 34.3C and Q
Heat loss and its cost without insulation was determined in the Prob. 20-36 to be 27.388 kW and $5647.
Then the reduction in the heat losses becomes
Q
or 25.388/27.40 = 0.927 (92.7%)
saved 27.388 1.988 25.40 kW
Therefore, the money saved by insulation will be 0.921($5647/yr) = $5237/yr which will pay for the cost
of $750 in $750/($5237/yr)=0.1432 year = 52.3 days.
20-33
PCB, Ts
= 0.7
1210.05 W
k 0.02588 W/m.C
1.608 10 5 m 2 /s
Pr 0.7282
1
1
0.0033 K -1
Tf
(30 273) K
Air
T = 25C
Tsurr = 25C
Analysis The solution of this problem requires a trial-and-error approach since the determination of the
Rayleigh number and thus the Nusselt number depends on the surface temperature which is unknown. We
start the solution process by guessing the surface temperature to be 35C for the evaluation of the
properties and h. We will check the accuracy of this guess later and repeat the calculations if necessary. The
characteristic length in this case is the height of the board, Lc L 0.3 m. Then,
Ra
g (Ts T ) L3
Pr
Nu 0.825
0.492
Pr
8 / 27
m /s )
(0.7282) 2.463 10 7
0.387 Ra 1 / 6
9 / 16
0.825
0.387( 2.463 10 7 ) 1 / 6
0.492
0.7282
40.57
8 / 27
9 / 16
k
0.02588 W/m.C
Nu
( 40.57) 3.50 W/m 2 .C
L
0 .3 m
2
As (0.3 m) 0.09 m 2
h
Considering both natural convection and radiation, the total rate of heat loss can be expressed as
20-34
PCB, Ts
1.608 10 5 m 2 /s
Pr 0.7282
1
1
0.0033 K -1
Tf
(30 273) K
= 0.7
1210.05 W
Air
T = 25C
Tsurr = 25C
L = 30 cm
Analysis The solution of this problem requires a trial-and-error approach since the determination of the
Rayleigh number and thus the Nusselt number depends on the surface temperature which is unknown. We
start the solution process by guessing the surface temperature to be 35C for the evaluation of the
properties and h. The characteristic length for both cases is determined from
A
(0.3 m) 2
Lc s
0.075 m.
p
2[(0.3 m) + (0.3 m)]
Then,
Ra
g (T s T ) L3c
Pr
m /s )
(0.7282) 3.848 10 5
k
0.02588 W/m.C
Nu
(13.45) 4.641 W/m 2 .C
Lc
0.075 m
As (0.3 m) 2 0.09 m 2
Considering both natural convection and radiation, the total rate of heat loss can be expressed as
k
0.02588 W/m.C
Nu
(6.725) 2.321 W/m 2 .C
Lc
0.075 m
Considering both natural convection and radiation, the total rate of heat loss can be expressed as
20-35
T = 30C
2m
k 0.02881 W/m.C
1.995 10 5 m 2 /s
Pr 0.7177
1
1
0.002915 K -1
Tf
(70 273) K
2m
Furnace
Ts = 110C
= 0.7
Analysis The characteristic length in this case is the height of the furnace, Lc L 2 m. Then,
Ra
g (Ts T ) L3
Pr
0.387 Ra 1 / 6
Nu 0.825
9 / 16
0.492
Pr
(0.7177) 3.301 10 10
8 / 27
0.825
0.387(3.301 10 10 ) 1 / 6
0.492
1
0.7177
9 / 16
369.2
8 / 27
k
0.02881 W/m.C
Nu
(369.2) 5.318 W/m 2 .C
Lc
2m
As 4(2 m ) 2 16 m 2
Then the heat loss by combined natural convection and radiation becomes
4
Q hA (T T ) A (T 4 T
)
s
s
2
surr
Q
0.9Q
0.9 15,119 W 13,607 W
saved
no insulation
Q
loss (1 0.9)Q no insulation 0.1 15,119 W 1512 W
The furnace operates continuously and thus 8760 h. Then the amount of energy and money the insulation
will save becomes
13.607 kJ/s
Energy saved Q
saved t
0.78
1 therm
(8760 3600 s/yr) 5215 therms/yr
105,500 kJ
Money saved (Energy saved)(Unit cost of energy) = (5215 therms)($0.55 / therm) $2868
Therefore, the money saved by insulation will pay for the cost of $550 in
550/($2868/yr)=0.1918 yr = 70 days.
20-36
1.702 10 5 m 2 /s
Pr 0.7255
1
1
0.003195 K -1
Tf
(40 273) K
Then,
Ra
g (Ts T ) L3
Pr
Nu 0.825
0.492
1
Pr
8 / 27
9 / 16
m /s )
0.387 Ra 1 / 6
0.825
0.387(1.256 1010 ) 1 / 6
0.492
1
0.7255
9 / 16
272.0
8 / 27
k
0.02662 W/m.C
Nu
(272.0) 3.620 W/m 2 .C
L
2m
As 4 (2 m)(2 2t insul ) m
The total rate of heat loss from the outer surface of the insulated furnace by convection and radiation
becomes
1512 W (3.620 W/m 2 .C) A(Ts 30)C + (0.7) A(5.67 10 8 W/m 2 .K 4 )[(Ts 273 K ) 4 (30 273 K )
In steady operation, the heat lost by the side surfaces of the pipe must be equal to the heat lost from the
exposed surface of the insulation by convection and radiation, which must be equal to the heat conducted
through the insulation. Therefore,
(T
Ts )
Q Q insulation kAs furnace
t ins
(110 Ts )C
t insul
Solving the two equations above by trial-and error (or better yet, an equation solver) gives
Ts = 48.4C and tinsul = 0.0254 m = 2.54 cm
20-37
T = 25C
k 0.02299 W/m.C
1.265 10 5 m 2 /s
Propane tank
0
Ts = -42C
D = 1.5 m
Pr 0.7383
1
1
0.003781 K -1
Tf
(8.5 273)K
L=4m
Analysis The tank gains heat through its cylindrical surface as well as its circular end surfaces. For
convenience, we take the heat transfer coefficient at the end surfaces of the tank to be the same as that of its
side surface. (The alternative is to treat the end surfaces as a vertical plate, but this will double the amount
of calculations without providing much improvement in accuracy since the area of the end surfaces is much
smaller and it is circular in shape rather than being rectangular). The characteristic length in this case is the
outer diameter of the tank, Lc D 1.5 m. Then,
Ra
g (T Ts ) D 3
Pr
0.387 Ra 1 / 6
Nu 0.6
1 0.559 / Pr 9 / 16
(1.265 10
2
8 / 27
m /s )
0.387(3.869 1010 ) 1 / 6
0.6
1 0.559 / 0.7383 9 / 16
8 / 27
(0.7383) 3.869 10 10
374.1
k
0.02299 W/m.C
Nu
(374.1) 5.733 W/m 2 .C
D
1 .5 m
As DL 2D 2 / 4 (1.5 m )(4 m ) 2 (1.5 m) 2 / 4 22.38 m 2
h
and
s
The total mass and the rate of evaporation of propane are
(1.5 m) 2
D 2
L (581 kg/m 3 )
(4 m) 4107 kg
4
4
Q
8.598 kJ/s
m
0.02023 kg/s
h fg
425 kJ/kg
m V
4107 kg
m
m
0.02023 kg/s
20-38
k 0.01525 Btu/h.ft.F
0.180 10 3 ft 2 /s
Pr 0.7262
Head
Q = 287 Btu/h
D = 12 in
1
1
0.001791 R -1
Tf
(98.5 460) R
= 0.9
Analysis The characteristic length for a spherical object is Lc = D = 12/24 = 0.5 ft. Then,
Ra
g (T s T ) D 3
Pr
0.589 Ra 1 / 4
Nu 2
0.469
Pr
4/9
9 / 16
ft /s )
0.589(6.943 10 6 ) 1 / 4
0.469
0.7262
4/9
9 / 16
(0.7262) 6.943 10 6
25.39
k
0.01525 Btu/h.ft. F
Nu
( 25.39) 0.7744 Btu/h.ft 2 .F
D
1 ft
As D 2 (0.5 ft ) 2 0.7854 ft 2
h
Considering both natural convection and radiation, the total rate of heat loss can be written as
20-39
Lamp
60 W
= 0.9
Air
T = 25C
2.279 10 5 m 2 /s
Pr 0.7116
1
1
0.002699 K -1
Tf
(97.5 273) K
D = 8 cm
Ra
g (T s T ) D
Pr
-1
Light,
6W
(0.7116 )
2.694 10 6
Nu 2
0.589 Ra 1 / 4
1 0.469 / Pr
9 / 16 4 / 9
0.589(2.694 10 6 ) 1 / 4
1 0.469 / 0.7116
9 / 16 4 / 9
20.42
Then
k
0.03077 W/m.C
Nu
( 20.42) 7.854 W/m 2 .C
D
0.08 m
As D 2 (0.08 m) 2 0.02011 m 2
h
Considering both natural convection and radiation, the total rate of heat loss can be written as
20-40
1.627 10 5 m 2 /s
Pr 0.7276
1
1
0.003279 K -1
Tf
(32 273) K
Tank
Ts = 44C
L = 1.1 m
= 0.4
D = 0.4 m
Analysis The characteristic length in this case is the height of the cylinder,
Lc L 1.1 m. Then,
Gr
g (Ts T ) L3
2
m /s )
3.883 10 9
35 L
D ( 0.4 m)
Gr
1/4
35(1.1 m)
0.1542 m
(3.883 10 9 ) 1 / 4
which is satisfied. That is, the Nusselt number relation for a vertical plate can be used for the side surfaces.
For the top and bottom surfaces we use the relevant Nusselt number relations. First, for the side surfaces,
Ra GrPr (3.883 10 9 )(0.7276 ) 2.825 10 9
Nu 0.825
0.387 Ra 1 / 6
0.492
1
Pr
8 / 27
9 / 16
0.825
0.387( 2.825 10 9 ) 1 / 6
0.492
1
0.7276
170.2
8 / 27
9 / 16
k
0.02603 W/m.C
Nu
(170.2) 4.027 W/m 2 .C
L
1.1 m
As DL (0.4 m )(1.1 m ) 1.382 m 2
h
2
2
Q
side hAs (T s T ) ( 4.027 W/m .C)(1.382 m )( 44 20)C 133.6 W
0.1 m
p
D
4
4
Lc
Ra
g (Ts T ) L3c
Pr
m /s )
(0.7276) 2.123 10 6
k
0.02603 W/m.C
Nu
(20.61) 5.365 W/m 2 .C
Lc
0.1 m
As D 2 / 4 (0.4 m ) 2 / 4 0.1257 m 2
2
2
Q
top hAs (T s T ) (5.365 W/m .C )(0.1257 m )( 44 20 )C 16.2 W
20-41
k
0.02603 W/m.C
Nu
(10.31) 2.683 W/m 2 .C
Lc
0.1 m
2
2
Q
bottom hAs (T s T ) ( 2.683 W/m .C)(0.1257 m )( 44 20)C 8.1 W
Q
conv Qside Q top Q bottom 133.6 16.2 8.1 157.9 W
(0.4 )(1.382 0.1257 0.1257 m 2 )(5.67 10 8 W/m 2 .K 4 ) (44 273 K ) 4 (20 273 K ) 4
101.1 W
20-42
1.489 10 5 m 2 /s
Pr 0.7317
= 0.6
Air
T = 24C
1
1
0.003448 K -1
Tf
(17 273)K
Analysis We first evaluate the heat transfer coefficient on the side surfaces. The characteristic length in this
case is the height of the container,
Lc L 0.28 m. Then,
Ra
g (T Ts ) L3
Pr
Nu 0.825
0.492
Pr
8 / 27
m /s )
(0.7317) 1.133 10 7
0.387 Ra 1 / 6
9 / 16
0.825
0.387(1.133 10 7 ) 1 / 6
0.492
0.7317
30.52
8 / 27
9 / 16
k
0.02491 W/m.C
Nu
(30.52) 4.224 W/m 2 .C
L
0.28 m
T T2
T1 T2
4
Q Q conv Q rad hAs T 1
As Tsurr
2
2
275 T2
( 4.224 W/m 2 .C)(0.2664 m 2 ) 297 -
(Eq. 1)
275 T2
where (T1+ T2)/2 is the average temperature of water (or the container surface). The mass of water in the
container is
m V (1000 kg/m 3 )(0.28 0.18 0.18)m 3 9.072 kg
20-43
Q 38,229(T2 - 275)
Q
3.53976(T2 - 275)
t
3 3600 s
(Eq. 2)
Setting Eq. 1 and Eq. 2 equal to each other, we obtain the final water temperature.
T2 284.7 K 11.7C
We could repeat the solution using air properties at the new film temperature using this value to increase
the accuracy. However, this would only affect the heat transfer value somewhat, which would not have
significant effect on the final water temperature. The average rate of heat transfer can be determined from
Eq. 2
3.53976(11.7 - 2) 34.3 W
Q
20-44
20-45
Tw2 [C]
4.013
5.837
7.496
9.013
10.41
11.69
12.88
13.98
15
15.96
16.85
17.69
18.48
19.22
19.92
20.59
21.21
21.81
22.37
22.91
25
20.5
Tw2 [C]
16
11.5
2.5
0
time [h]
20-46
10
2.066 10 5 m 2 /s
Pr 0.7161
1
1
0.002857 K -1
Tf
(77 273)K
Stove
Ts
L =0.7 m
= 0.85
D = 0.32 m
Analysis The characteristic length in this case is the height of the cylindir,
Lc L 0.7 m. Then,
Gr
g (T s T ) L3
2.387 10 9
D ( 0.32 m)
35L
Gr
1/4
35(0.7 m)
(2.387 10 9 ) 1 / 4
0.1108 m
which is satisfied. That is, the Nusselt number relation for a vertical plate can be used for side surfaces.
Ra GrPr ( 2.387 10 9 )(0.7161) 1.709 10 9
Nu 0.825
0.492
Pr
8 / 27
9 / 16
0.387Ra 1 / 6
0.825
0.387(1.709 10 9 ) 1 / 6
0.492
0.7161
145.2
8 / 27
9 / 16
k
0.02931 W/m.C
Nu
(145.2) 6.080 W/m 2 .C
L
0 .7 m
As DL D 2 / 4 (0.32 m )(0.7 m ) (0.32 m ) 2 / 4 0.7841 m 2
h
1200 W (6.080 W/m 2 .C)(0.7841 m 2 )(T s 297) (0.85)(0.7841 m 2 )(5.67 10 -8 W/m 2 .K 4 )(Ts 4 29
T s 400.6 K 127.6C
The amount of coal used is determined from
Q Q t (1.2 kJ/s)(14 h/day 3600 s/h) = 60,480 kJ
Q / (60,480 kJ)/0.65
m coal
3.102 kg
HV
30,000 kJ/kg
20-47
k 0.6515 W/m.C
0.474 10 6 m 2 /s
Pr 3.12
Water
T,ave = 30C
0.501 10 3 K -1
D = 6 cm
Ra
g (Ts T ) D 3
Nu 2
Pr
0.589 Ra 1 / 4
1 0.469 / Pr
9 / 16 4 / 9
m /s )
0.589(8.108 10 8 ) 1 / 4
1 0.469 / 3.12
9 / 16 4 / 9
(3.12) 8.108 10 8
89.14
k
0.6515 W/m.C
Nu
(89.14 ) 967.9 W/m 2 .C
D
0.06 m
As D 2 (0.06 m) 2 0.01131 m 2
h
Q
conv hAs (T s T ) (967.9 W/m .C)(0.01131 m )(85 30) 602.1 W
The mass of water in the container is
m V (996 kg/m 3 )(0.040 m 3 ) 39.84 kg
Q
4.994 10 6 J
602.1 J/s
Q
20-48