Why Willie Sutton Robbed Banks
Why Willie Sutton Robbed Banks
Why Willie Sutton Robbed Banks
At security conferences and in security writing (Felson and Clarke, 1998) the Sutton
anecdote is presented as both amusing and educational, implying that security should
focus on protecting the most valuable and convertible assets. (In fairness to Felson and
Clarke, they use the "said to have said" version.)
In fact, I have used the anecdote myself, for example: "Why do [criminal hackers] seek
unauthorized access to networks and digital devices? Because that's where the data is,
and data is the new currency." However, in that same 2011 SC Magazine article I also
noted Sutton's true motivation, and not just to be snarky.
The serious message here is that the reality of Sutton robbing banks because he enjoyed
it is immediately recognizable to anyone who has studied the thrill of hacking and the
phenomenon of hacktivism. In other words, Sutton may be a poster boy for expressive
crimes, those "containing a high emotional or expressive element" (Hayward, 2007);
these are crimes in which reason plays only a small role, if any. Expressive crimes are
potentially immune to crime prevention measures based on Rational Choice Theory and
Classical criminology.
Which brings us to late 2014 and the multiple hacking attacks on Sony, both the
destruction of data at Sony Pictures and the sustained denial of service attack on the
PlayStation Network (PSN). We already know that the latter was perpetrated by a group
of people going by the name of Lizard Squad and motivated, first and foremost, by the
fun of it (see interview transcripts such as this one).
While many organizations focus IT security efforts of protecting data that can be readily
converted to cash, Sutton and Sony remind us that for some criminals, the thrill of the
crime is the primary motivator. And if the fear of apprehension and detention is not
stronger than the love of the crime act, the chances of creating an effective deterrent are
slim.