Magnetics, Electromagnetic Forces, Generated Voltage, and Energy I Conversion
Magnetics, Electromagnetic Forces, Generated Voltage, and Energy I Conversion
flux lines, have been assigned a specific direction that is related to the
polarity of a magnet, or the direction of current in a coil or a conductor.
The direction r)f the magnetic field around a current may be determined
by the right-hand rule: Grasp the conductor with the right hand, with the
thumb pointing in the direction of conventional current, and the fingers
will curl in the direction of the magnetic field. This can be visualized in
Figure l-1(a).
stator core, a rotor core, and two air gaps. Note that the flux always takes
the shortest path across an air gap.
Magnetomotive Force
The ampere-turns (A-t) of the respective coils in Figure 1-2
represent the driving force, called magnetomotive force or mmf, that
causes a magnetic field to appear in the corresponding magnetic circuits.
Expressed in equation form,
= N-l
(1-1)
where:
= magnetomotive force (mmf) in ampere-turns (A-t)
N = number of turns in coil
I = current in coil (A)
Magnetic Field Intensity
Magnetic field intensity, also called mmf gradient, is defined as the
magnetomotive force per unit length of magnetic circuit or section of
magnetic circuit, and is numerically equal to the ampere-turns applied to
the magnetic circuit (section) divided by the effective length of the
magnetic circuit (section). That is,
(1-2)
where:
H = magnetic field intensity (A-t/m)
section, the field intensity is the same at all points in the magnetic circuit.
composite magnetic circuits, consisting of sections of different materials
where:
= magnetic flux (Wb)
=magnetomotive force (A-t)
= reluctance of magnetic circuit (A-t/Wb)
Reluctance is a measure of the opposition the magnetic circuit
offers to the flux, and is analogous to resistance in an electric circuit. The
reluctance of a magnetic circuit, or section of a magnetic circuit, is related
to its length, cross-sectional area, and permeability. Solving Eq. (1-4) for
dividing numerator and denominator by and rearranging terms,
Defining
Where
B = flux density (V/b/m2) or teslas (T)
H = magnetic field intensity (A-t/m)
where:
0 = permeability of free space = 410-7 (Wb/A-t-m)
r = relative permeability, a dimensionless constant
= permeability of material (Wb/A-t-m)
Representative graphs of Eq. (1-5) for some commonly used
ferromagnetic materials are shown in Figure 1-3. The graphs, called B-H
curves, magnetization curves, or saturation curves, are very useful in
design, and in the analysis of machine and transformer behavior.
The four principal sections of a typical magnetization curve are
illustrated in Figure 1-4. The curve is concave up for "low" values of
magnetic field intensity, exhibits a somewhat (but not always) linear
characteristic for "medium" field intensities, and then is concave down
for "high" field intensities, eventually flattening to an almost horizontal
line for "very high" intensities. The part of the curve that is concave down
is known as the knee of the curve, and the "flattened" section is the
saturation region. Magnetic saturation is complete when all of the
magnetic domains of the material are oriented in the direction of the
applied
magnetomotive force. Saturation begins at the start of the knee region and
is essentially complete when the curve starts to flatten.
Depending on the specific application, the magnetic core of an
apparatus may be operated in the linear region, the knee region, and/or
the saturation region. For example, transformers and AC machines are
operated in the linear region and lower end of the knee; self-excited DC
generators and DC motors are operated in the upper end of the knee
region, extending into the saturation region; separately excited DC
generators are operated in the linear and tower end of the knee region.
Magnetization curves supplied by manufacturers for specific
electrical steel sheets or castings are usually plotted on semilog paper,
and often include a curve of relative permeability vs. field intensity, as
shown in Figure 1-5.'
10
Where
Corresponds to I
Corresponds to E
Corresponds to R
Continuing the analogy, the equivalent reluctance of n reluctances
in series is
ser = 1 + 2 + 3 + ..+ n
The equivalent reluctance of n reluctances in parallel is
1
1
1
1
1
...........
par 1 2 3
n
Or
11
When the current reaches its maximum value, the flux density and
magnetic field 1 intensity have their respective maximum values, and the
curve is at point a; this initial trace of the curve, drawn with a broken line,
is called the virgin section of the curve. As the current decreases, the
curve follows a different path, and when
12
the current is reduced to zero. H is reduced to zero, but the flux density in
the core lags behind, holding at point b on the curve. The flux density at
point b is the residual magnetism. This lagging of flux behind the
magnetizing force is the hysteresis effect.
As the alternating current and associated magnetic field intensity
increase in the negative direction, the residual magnetism decreases but
remains positive until point c is reached, at which time the flux density in
the core is zero. The negative field intensity required to force the residual
magnetism to zero is called the coercive force, and is represented by line
13
B nmax
where:
Ph = hysteresis loss (W/unit mass of core)
= frequency of flux wave (Hz)
B nmax
kh = constant
14
15
1-9
conductors in rotor slots, and the rotor centered between the poles of a
stationary magnet (called the stator). The + mark on the end of conductor
16
17
eff .I
where:
F = mechanical force (N)
B = flux density of stator field (T)
I = current in conductor (A)
eff
FIGURE 1-11 (a) Conductor carrying current, situated within and perpendicular
to the B-field of a permanent magnet; (b) conductor skewed
18
conductor is not perpendicular to the magnetic field as shown in Figure 11 l(b), the effective length of the conductor is
eff .I
sin
N-m
eff
. I . d N-m
19
d
dt
where:
e = induced voltage (electromotive force, emf) (V)
N = number of series-connected turns
d/ dt = rate of change of flux through window (Wb/s)
21
FIGURE 1-13 Closed loop consisting of two conductors and a set of conducting
rails; (b) direction of emf and current caused by conductor moving to the right;
(c) equivalent circuit, both conductors moving in the same direction; (d)
equivalent circuit, conductors moving in opposite directions.
22
Expressing the flux in terms of the flux density and the area of the
window,
= B.A
Taking the derivative with respect to time,
ds
dt
Since ds/dt represents the velocity of the conductor, Eq. (l-18) may be
rewritten as
e = B .
where:
e = induced voltage (V)
B = flax density of field (T)
23
24
25
FIGURE 1-14 (a) Closed coil rotating CW within a magnetic field; (b) direction
of emf and current for the instant shown in (a).
26
Sinusoidal Emfs
Referring to the elementary generator in Figure l-14(a), if the coil
rotates at a constant angular velocity in a uniform magnetic field, the
variation of flux through the coil window will be sinusoidal.
= maxsin(t)
where:
t = instantaneous angle that the plane of the coil makes
with the flux lines (rad)
max = maximum flux through coil window (Wb)
Referring to Figure l-14(a), the maximum flux through the coil
window occurs when the window of the coil is parallel to the pole face.
The rate-of-change of flux through the window as the coil rotates
within the magnetic field is
d
max cos(t )
dt
d
N.max cos(t )
dt
27
d
dt
Expressed in terms of frequency and flux density, as00 obtained from Eq.
(1-25),
Ee . Bmax
Slicing the core into man)' laminations and insulating one from the
other will reduce the magnitude of the eddy currents by providing smaller
paths, and hence lower eddy voltages. 'This is shown in Figure l-15(b).
Laminated cores are made by stacking insulated steel stampings to the
desired thickness or depth. Each lamination is insulated by a coating of
insulating varnish or oxide on one or
29
where:
Pe = eddy-current loss (W/unit mass)
= frequency of flux wave (Hz)
Bmax = maximum value of flux density wave (T)
Ke = constant
The constant ke is dependent on the lamination thickness, electrical
resistivity, density and mass of the core material, and the units used.
30
31
Figure 1-16 Four pols generator: (a) flux through coil window is at maximum
value; (b) net flux through coil window is zero; (c) variation of flux through coil
window as rotor turns in CCW direction.
Note that for a four-pole machine, such as that shown in Figure 1-16,
one! revolution of the rotor causes two complete cycles of flux to pass
through the coil] window, one cycle per pair of poles. Similarly, a sixpole machine would produce] three cycles per revolution, etc. Expressed
as an equation,
=
Pn
2
32
where:
= frequency in Hz
P = number of poles
N = rotational speed (r/s)
Note also that, for a four-pole machine 720 of the periodic wave
corresponds to 360 of angular displacement of the rotor. Hence, to
differentiate between the degrees of an electrical quantity and the degrees
of space displacement, the former are known as electrical degrees or time
degrees, and the latter as space degrees. This distinction is also used in
radian measure, namely electrical radians' and space radians.
As indicated in Figure 1-16(c), the relationship between electrical
degrees and space degrees is
Elec. deg . space deg.
P
2
where:
P = the number of poles
Unless otherwise specified, angular measurement used in electrical
transactions in j this text, and in other electrical texts, are expressed in
electrical degrees or] electrical radians. Adjacent poles are always 180
electrical degrees ( electrical radians) apart.
33