Skype and Google Have Lessons For Operators in How To Compete

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Disruptive technologies

Operators see Skype, Google and other over-the-top companies as threats yet they should
also learn from the way they have developed and won customer loyalty

Skype and Google have lessons


for operators in how to compete
customers with smartphones and data plans the option
to extend their unlimited calling community to hundreds of millions of Skype users around the globe.
Innovative Japanese mobile operator KDDI said
in October that it would start offering Skype on its
Android phones from November.

Deeper integration

Scott Stonham, CommuniGate:


The worry is that large numbers of
subscribers are choosing to use third
party applications instead of those
offered by the network operators

Telecoms operators the world over are terrified about


the long-term impact of Skype, the over-the-top
internet company that offers free voice and video
calls the world over between Skype customers, and
cut-price calls to regular phone numbers.
Trouble is, for Skype-to-Skype calls the word customer doesnt really apply, as the software is free to
download and use: all the customer needs is a broadband service. Skype gets nothing, but neither does the
broadband provider.
Skype customers do pay for two optional features: a
phone number where ordinary callers can reach them
calls are diverted to their Skype service and a feature
called SkypeOut, by which they can call standard fixed or
mobile numbers around the world, at rates from 0.019
a minute upwards or less with a monthly account.
But at the same time many operators the world over
are working closely with Skype to offer integrated services, including Verizon in the US and KDDI in Japan.
Verizon Wireless announced at Mobile World
Congress in February 2010 that its customers would
be able to make and receive free calls to other Skype
customers across the world.
Customers can also use SkypeOut service to call
regular phone numbers at a fraction the cost charged
by regular operators, including Verizon Wireless itself.
The only proviso that Verizon Wireless 45%
owned by Vodafone made was that customers
taking up the offer should have a data plan for their
smartphones.
Verizon Wireless chief marketing officer John
Strattons said at the time: Were effectively giving

52 Global Telecoms Business: November/December 2010

The VoIP services will initially be made available on


two smartphones in the au range, the IS01 and IS03,
but the operator says in plans deeper integration on a
range of au Android devices and other devices in 2011.
Users of the service would be able to make unlimited Skype-to-Skype voice calls without being charged
against their monthly minute allowance or data plan.
Takashi Tanaka, a senior vice president and board
member at KDDI, said: Skype on au is a breakthrough in giving customers in Japan unlimited,
global communications options, while expanding
their calling community to hundreds of millions of
Skype users worldwide.
Skypes CFO Adrian Dillon acting CEO until
new CEO Tony Bates was able to start said:
KDDIs position as a leading network provider in
Japan that offers a wide range of communications
services makes it a natural partner for Skype given
our vision to make Skype available everywhere and
enable users to take their Skype conversations with
them wherever they go.
Hutchisons Three has been offering Skype services to
customers for a number of years and the company claims
that its users have already made a billion minutes of calls.
The deals havent brought Hutchison down; on the
other hand they havent pushed Hutch to the number
one position in any of its mobile markets either so
perhaps Skype is not the threat that many think.
Meanwhile the industry is starting to worry about
another potential theat, this time from Google. For
years the company has been running Gmail chat, an
add-on to its email system that allows users to have
voice and video chats free of charge as does Microsoft for its Hotmail customers.
From August 2010 Google added a feature that
allowed US customers of Gmail to be able to call telephones directly from their email. The search engine
company said it would provide free calls to the US
and Canadian phones from Gmail for the rest of 2010
and charge low rates for calls made to other countries.
Calls from the US to the UK, France, Germany,
China and Japan were priced at $0.02 a minute.
The service is available only to Gmail users in the US

www.globaltelecomsbusiness.com

Disruptive technologies

Adrian Dillon, Skype: KDDI is


a natural partner for Skype,
enabling users to take their Skype
conversations with them wherever
they go

just like Google Voice, the companys existing phone


offer, which has also been limited to US customers.

Conference calls
Google Voice is a sophisticated system that allows
customers to set up a new US phone number which
can ring existing office, mobile or home phones
simultaneously or call one or two of them, based
on features such as time of day or where the call is
coming from. And conference calls are easier to set
up than with conventional wired phones.
So far, though, its limited to the US. Anyone from
outside who tries to sign up or even express interest, is told: Thanks for visiting Google Voice. Were
not yet open for users outside the US, but are planning to expand our service to additional countries in
the future. No details, though.
Skype did it the other way round: it was created by
a Swede, Niklas Zennstrm, and a Dane, Janus Friis,
with software from a group of Estonians and the
team had a world view from day one. The service was
launched in 2003 and Skype is now the biggest consumer of international telecoms minutes and its annual
revenue is now running at around $800 million.
So where does this leave conventional telecoms
operators, faced with competition from these cloud
operators? They have a number of options: they can
watch Skype and Google provide innovative services
to customers while they get almost no revenue apart
from charging for a fixed or mobile data service; they
can make deals with Skype, as Hutchison, KDDI and
Verizon Wireless; or they can compete by providing
advanced services.

Competitive dynamic
Telecoms consultant Martin Geddes pointed out the
quandary in an article in Global Telecoms Business
earlier in 2010. Communications in the cloud is a
paradigm shift in which power moves from ownership
of data networks to control of software platform, he
wrote. It sets up a new competitive dynamic between
the IT and telecoms industries and their respective
ecosystems to supply the capabilities that fill the gap.
Scott Stonham, vice president of marketing at
CommuniGate Systems, has also written extensively
about the challenge of voice over IP services such
as Skype in Global Telecoms Business. While we

www.globaltelecomsbusiness.com

thought the competition was about voice revenues;


that hasnt turned out to be the case, he says. The
real threat comes from brand erosion and the costs
operators have to bear in maintaining a network to
support the service and data delivery of third party
applications from over-the-top providers, such as
Google, Skype, Facebook and many others.
The effect of those services is far more acute than simple loss of voice revenue. A smartphone user consumes
between considerably more bandwidth than the average
voice subscriber see the latest analysis on page 55.
Figures show that consumption of data bandwidth
at AT&T, which markets the iPhone exclusively in
the US, has grown 50-fold while its data revenues
have increased only 250%. Meanwhile, the operators
AT&T, Telefnica and others have to build and
maintain networks to support that growth.
Recent research from TeleGeography says that
international Skype traffic amounted to 54 billion
minutes in 2009. While the number of minutes is
substantial, the revenue generated by Skype and consequently lost to operators has not, to date, confirmed
the worst fears of early predictions.
For the first half of 2010, Skype reported a profit of
just $13 million almost insignificant on $406 million of revenue, 87% of which was generated through
SkypeOut credit sales.
With the remaining 13%, or $52 million of its total
revenues, being attributed to its other services, such
as conferencing, SkypeIn and voicemail, what is all
the worry about?

Impact on operators
Stonham warns: The worry is that large numbers of subscribers are choosing to use third party
applications instead of those offered by the network
operators, and this in turn impacts the operators in a
plethora of ways, of which only one is revenue.
Google Voice is an example, he says: Google
Voice gives users one number that is portable across
any network, mobile, VoIP or fixed line; inserting
a layer between the subscriber and the operator
that, when supplied with the other network-agnostic
features it offers, such as voicemail, call history,
conference calling, call screening and blocking and
voice transcription of voicemail messages, completely
decouples the subscriber from the network.
As a result the subscriber associates value with the
Google applications, not with the underlying network.
In fact, with Googles positioning, in the eyes of the
subscriber, the network provider becomes simply a
cost rather than a value-add, notes Stonham. Once
a user associates Google as its voice, messaging, data,
email and apps provider the role of the carrier beyond
being the commoditised provider of a broadband connection or a SIM card looks significantly threatened.
So the message is clear: carriers have to move
beyond being just bit-transporters. That means
offering their paying customers services that they
will value and pay for. Operators should learn
from Skype, Google and the other over-the-top players not just by doing something of what they do,
but also by creating the same sort of customer loyalty
shown by those people who spend hours at a time
logged into Facebook. n
Global Telecoms Business: November/December 2010 53

You might also like