0% found this document useful (0 votes)
74 views19 pages

Testing Two Related Means

The document discusses hypothesis testing for comparing two related means, such as measurements taken from the same subjects before and after an intervention. It presents three study designs where measurements are related: before-after, repeated measures, and paired observations from natural pairs. It describes the notation, assumptions, and hypotheses for the paired t-test and z-test. An example shows how to conduct a paired t-test in Excel and SPSS to determine if a new computer system is faster than an old system based on processing times of the same jobs on both systems. The relationship between the standard deviation of the differences and the standard deviations and correlation of the paired samples is also shown.

Uploaded by

Sylvia Cheung
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
74 views19 pages

Testing Two Related Means

The document discusses hypothesis testing for comparing two related means, such as measurements taken from the same subjects before and after an intervention. It presents three study designs where measurements are related: before-after, repeated measures, and paired observations from natural pairs. It describes the notation, assumptions, and hypotheses for the paired t-test and z-test. An example shows how to conduct a paired t-test in Excel and SPSS to determine if a new computer system is faster than an old system based on processing times of the same jobs on both systems. The relationship between the standard deviation of the differences and the standard deviations and correlation of the paired samples is also shown.

Uploaded by

Sylvia Cheung
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19

Hypothesis Testing :

Two Related Means

Comparing Two Related Means

Before-after study :
blood pressure of a patient before/after intake of a drug
performance of staff before/after receiving training
Name

Before

After

A
B
C
D
E
F

210
185
215
198
187
225

196
192
204
193
181
233

Comparing Two Related Means

Repeated measure study :


blood pressure of a patient measured several times in a day
Name
A
B
C
D
:
Y
Z

Blood
Blood
Pressure (am) Pressure (pm)
135
136
121
121
:
116
117

126
129
124
119
:
123
120

Comparing Two Related Means

Experiment with natural pairing :


comparing the heights of husband and wife
comparing the IQ of twins
Pair

Husband

Wife

1
2
3
4
5
6

2.1
1.8
1.5
1.6
1.8
1.7

1.9
1.9
1.4
1.3
1.8
2.3

Notations & Assumptions


Pair

1st sample

2nd sample

Difference

1
2
:
n

X11
X12
:
X1n

X21
X22
:
X2n

D1 = X11 X21
D2 = X12 X22
:
Dn = X1n X2n

The two random samples come from normal populations

The differences form a random sample from a


normal population with mean D and variance

D2

Comparing Two Related Means

Hypotheses :

H0: D

H1: D< (lower-tail test)

H0: D

H1: D > (upper-tail test)

H0: D =

H1: D (two-tail test)

D is estimated by D where
n

D (X
i1

i1

1i

X 2i )

X1 X 2

Paired Z Test

Used when :

populations normal

D known

Test statistic :

D
Z
D n

Paired t Test

Used when :

populations normal

D unknown

Test statistic :

D
t
SD
n

where

SD

which has a t distribution with (n-1) df

2
(
D

D
)
i
i 1

n 1

Paired t Test : Example


Is the new computer system faster at the 0.05 level ? You collect
the processing times of 10 jobs, assumed coming from normal
populations :
User Old System (1)
C.B.
9.98 s
T.F.
9.88
M.H.
9.84
R.K.
9.99
M.O.
9.94
D.S.
9.84
S.S.
9.86
C.T.
10.12
K.T.
9.90
S.Z.
9.91

New System (2)


9.88 s
9.86
9.75
9.80
9.87
9.84
9.87
9.98
9.83
9.86

Difference
0.10
0.02
0.09
0.19
0.07
0.00
- 0.01
0.14
0.07
0.05

Paired t Test : Example

(continued)

Step 1: Define hypotheses

H 0 : D 0

(new system is not faster)

H1 : D > 0

(new system is faster)

Paired t Test : Example


(continued)

Step 2: Determine the rejection region

- Significance level is 0.05


- Critical Value: t , n 1 t0.05, 10-1 1.8331
- Reject H0 if t 1.8331
Rejection
Region

t0.05,101 1.8331

Paired t Test : Example


(continued)

Step 3: Compute test statistic


D

SD

0.072

D D
i

n 1

0.06215

Test Statistic

D0
0.072 0
t

3.66
S D n 0.06215 10

Paired t Test : Example

Step 4: Make decision

(continued)

Since t = 3.66 is in
the rejection region,
we reject the null
hypothesis.
There is sufficient
evidence that the
new system is faster
than the existing
system

Rejection
region

-4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5

0.5

1.5

2.5

t0.05,101 1.8331

3.5

t 3.66

Test Statistic 3.66 is in the Rejection Region

Paired t Test Using EXCEL

Paired t Test Using EXCEL

Paired t Test Using SPSS

Paired t Test Using SPSS

Paired t Test Using SPSS

Relation Between S D , S1 , S2 and

2
(
D

D
)
S D2 i
n 1
i 1
n

(( X 1i X 1 ) ( X 2i X 2 )) 2
=
n 1
i 1
n

n
( X 1i X 1 ) 2 n ( X 2i X 2 ) 2
( X 1i X 1 )( X 2i X 2 )

2
n 1
n 1
n 1
i 1
i 1
i 1
n

S12 S 22 2 S12
S12 S 22 2rS1S 2

You might also like