Breakthrough in On The Training Sec C Group 6
Breakthrough in On The Training Sec C Group 6
Breakthrough in On The Training Sec C Group 6
Breakthrough in On-the-Job
Training"
Assignment:HRM
HRM
Assignment:
(For
Submission
Professor
Patturaja
Selvaraja)
(For
Submission
to:to:
Professor
Patturaja
Selvaraja)
Submitted by,
Group No 6. Sec: C
1. Akansha Singh (2014PGP019)
2. Devanshi Laddha (2011IPM020)
3. Karunakar Keesari Reddy (2014PGP161)
4. Kodeswaran (2014PGP167)
5. Ragavendar R (2014PGP279)
6. Shubham Goel (2014PGP359)
7. Sushant Besra (2014PGP389)
SUMMARY
A study at Texas Instruments (TI) revealed that a lack of minimal job competence
and the resultant debilitating anxieties caused failures in problem solving. To reduce the
anxiety of new employees so as to speed the achievement of a competence level,
manufacturing managers at TI designed a special orientation program. The results were
significant gains in learning time, quality production, and job attendance.
Setting of Study at TI:
The effect of anxiety on learning time and attitudes among new employees was
studied through the experiment conducted at Texas Instruments. Before interviews with
assembly workers and their supervisors the experiment identified the importance of
anxiety in inhibiting job effectiveness for both operators and supervisors. New women
assembly workers were divided into a control group and an experimental group. The
controls received the usual two hour, first day orientation. The experimental group
received this plus a special one day anxiety reduction session in which they were
encouraged to think of success and to communicate with their supervisors. The
difference between the groups in learning time and attitude was apparent at once and
at the end of one month the experimental group was significantly outperforming the
controls. By reducing anxiety, the following gains were accomplished--training time was
cut in half, costs were lowered to one third of previous levels, absenteeism and
tardiness dropped to one half, waste and rejects to one fifth, and costs were cut as
much as 15 to 30 %. New and transferred supervisors were trained by the employees,
increasing communication, supervisor knowledge of operations, and confidence in
supervisors.
Control Group:
The control group went through the usual first-day orientation, which consisted of
a two-hour briefing on hours of work, insurance, parking, work rules, and employee
services. This session included warnings of the consequences of failure to conform to
organization expectations and, though not intended as a threat, tended to raise rather
than reduce anxieties.
Experimental Group:
The experimental group participated in a one-day program especially designed to
overcome anxieties not eliminated by the usual process of job orientation. Following the
two-hour orientation by Personnel, they were isolated in a conference room before they
could be initiated by their peers. They were told there would be no work the first day,
that they should relax, sit back, and have a coke or cigarette, and use this time to get
acquainted with the organization and each other and to ask questions. Throughout this
one-day anxiety-reduction session, questions were encouraged and answered. This
orientation emphasized four points:
Your opportunity to succeed is very good
Implication of Training:
Based on the observations and results obtained on the control and experiment
group, the experts have figured out the improvement in various parameters of the
workers. The level anxiety still pertained among both the groups, but the rate of ease
encouraged them to focus on their level of competency. The improvement various
parameters among the two groups were discussed in the below table.
Parameters
Control Group
Competence level
of
They
can
produce
with
practically 0 defects and reduced
the rejection rate to around 10%
with zero time lags.
Spread
Confidence
Quality
Improvement
Communication
Experiment Group
Absenteeism
Couldnt communicate to
other department workers
High (2.5%)
Points of agreement:
1 Anxiety does affect the level of performance of the new employees. The reverse
may or may not be true i.e. good performance level may or may not affect
anxiety as it has various sources of origin like threatening new environment,
personal issues, self-expression in the organization..
2 On the job training did improve the efficiency and quality of work of the new
employees. An experimental group and a control group were formed which
illustrated the above idea. For similar efficiency and quality the employees who
werent given on the job training took long time to achieve those levels.
3 On the job training also enhanced the confidence level of the new employees.
They understood their job role in a better way, they knew what was expected of
them. They had better motivation and satisfaction than their peers. On the job
training improved the focus of the new employees.
4 Organizational defects like absenteeism and subordinate-supervisor relationship
gap have been effectively reduced to lower levels. The interaction between the
seniors and juniors heavily reduced anxiety among both. The supervisors found
this technique equally useful for themselves in interacting with the new
employees.
Points of disagreements:
1 On the job training, requires trainees to open up to their peers and their
supervisors without that it becomes just another training session and produces
results slower than otherwise. If the supervisor or the new employee, are
introvert in nature, then this idea may be difficult to implement. So the personality
distorts the idea of effective on the job training.
2 With the dynamic environment it may not be possible for line managers to
continuously look after their subordinates. This poses a challenge for on the job
training methodology. The industry environment may fluctuate with fluctuating
government, economies which might lead to change in manufacturing practices.
The line managers themselves might find it difficult to adjust with the dynamism.
Therefore in such cases on the job training may be a time consuming idea.
3 On the job training may reduce costs and wastage in the long run but in the short
run this statement is debatable. The ideal significance of on the job training, i.e.
reducing costs and wastages and increasing efficiency is also subject to current
stature of the company. If your companys financial conditions are not healthy
then on the job training may go for a toss.
4 On the job training lays emphasis on job role understanding and catching the
processes as fast as possible. This channels the focus of the employees to a
single approach of doing a job. This might not be desired where innovation in
doing a job or the job itself should vary.