Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 64 views

    BCCI Vs CCI

    Uploaded by

    Danish KHan
    This document contains summaries of three orders from the Competition Appellate Tribunal. The first order recalls an earlier order dismissing an appeal, allowing the appeal to be heard on February 25th after the appellant's counsel was found to have missed the previous hearing due to non-deliberate reasons. The second order notes that the respondent has complied with a previous order by delivering property possession to the appellant. It schedules a future hearing and directs two company directors to be present. The third order grants the parties' request to adjourn a hearing so they can obtain certified copies of documents from the tribunal registry, rescheduling final arguments for March 26th and directing the copies be provided within a week

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    BCCI Vs CCI

    Uploaded by

    Danish KHan
    64 views3 pages
    This document contains summaries of three orders from the Competition Appellate Tribunal. The first order recalls an earlier order dismissing an appeal, allowing the appeal to be heard on February 25th after the appellant's counsel was found to have missed the previous hearing due to non-deliberate reasons. The second order notes that the respondent has complied with a previous order by delivering property possession to the appellant. It schedules a future hearing and directs two company directors to be present. The third order grants the parties' request to adjourn a hearing so they can obtain certified copies of documents from the tribunal registry, rescheduling final arguments for March 26th and directing the copies be provided within a week

    Original Description:

    Random SHit

    Original Title

    BCCI vs CCI

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains summaries of three orders from the Competition Appellate Tribunal. The first order recalls an earlier order dismissing an appeal, allowing the appeal to be heard on February 25th after the appellant's counsel was found to have missed the previous hearing due to non-deliberate reasons. The second order notes that the respondent has complied with a previous order by delivering property possession to the appellant. It schedules a future hearing and directs two company directors to be present. The third order grants the parties' request to adjourn a hearing so they can obtain certified copies of documents from the tribunal registry, rescheduling final arguments for March 26th and directing the copies be provided within a week

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    64 views3 pages

    BCCI Vs CCI

    Uploaded by

    Danish KHan
    This document contains summaries of three orders from the Competition Appellate Tribunal. The first order recalls an earlier order dismissing an appeal, allowing the appeal to be heard on February 25th after the appellant's counsel was found to have missed the previous hearing due to non-deliberate reasons. The second order notes that the respondent has complied with a previous order by delivering property possession to the appellant. It schedules a future hearing and directs two company directors to be present. The third order grants the parties' request to adjourn a hearing so they can obtain certified copies of documents from the tribunal registry, rescheduling final arguments for March 26th and directing the copies be provided within a week

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

    I.A. No.64/2015 in Appeal No.52/2014


    [Under Section 53-B of the Competition Act 2002 against the order dated
    02.04.2014 passed by the Competition Commission of India in case
    no.05/2014 ]
    CORAM
    Honble Shri. Justice G.S. Singhvi
    Chairman
    in the matter of:
    TDI Republic Shop Owner Welfare Association

    .. Appellant

    Vs.
    E-City Property Management & Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
    Appearances

    Respondents

    Shri Manjit Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate for the Appellant.


    Ms. Shyel Trehan, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
    ORDER

    This is an application by the appellant for recall of order dated.


    05.02.2015.
    Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record,
    I am satisfied that non appearance of the learned counsel for the appellant
    on 5.2.2015 was not deliberate. Consequently, the application is allowed
    and order dated 05.02.2015 dismissing the appeal is recalled.
    The appeal may now be listed on 25th February, 2015 for final
    hearing.

    [G.S.Singhvi]
    Chairman
    23rd February , 2015

    COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL


    Appeal No.07/2013
    [Under Section 53-B of the Competition Act 2002 against the order dated
    11.10.2012 passed by the Competition Commission of India in case no.43
    /2012 ]
    CORAM
    Honble Shri. Justice G.S. Singhvi
    Chairman
    In the matter of:
    Shri A.K. Jain

    .. Appellant

    Vs.
    M/s. The Dwarkadhis Projects Pvt. Ltd.
    Appearances

    Respondent

    Shri A.K. Jain, Appellant in person.


    Shri Nityanand Singh, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
    ORDER

    Shri Sulekh Chand Jain to whom notice of contempt was issued is


    present in person. Learned counsel for the respondent says that one of
    the two Directors Shri Vikas Jain to whom notice of contempt was issued
    has not been able to come because he is down with H-1 N-1 fever.
    Shri Nityanand Singh further stated that his client has complied with
    order dated 7.11.2014 and possession of the house has been delivered to
    the appellant.
    Shri A.K. Jain admits that he has received possession of the house.
    Let the matter be listed on 14th April, 2015.
    On the next date of hearing Shri Sulekh Chand Jain and Shri Vikas
    Jain, Directors of Respondent No. 1 should remain present.
    [G.S.Singhvi]
    Chairman
    23rd February , 2015

    COMPETITION APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

    M.A. No. 03/2014


    U.T.P.E. 112/1998

    Honble Shri. Justice G.S. Singhvi


    Chairman
    In the matter of:
    Heritage City Resident Welfare Association

    .. Appellant

    Vs.
    M/s. Unitech Ltd. & Anr.
    Appearances

    Respondents

    Shri Anuj Vibhor, Advocate for the Appellant.


    Ms. Deeksha Manchanda, Advocate for Respondent
    No.1.
    ORDER

    Learned counsel for the parties request for an adjournment by saying


    that their respective clients have made applications for certified copies,
    which are yet to be made available by the Registry of the Tribunal.
    The request of the learned counsel of the parties is accepted.
    List on 26th March, 2015 for final arguments.
    The Registry of the Tribunal shall ensure that certified copies of the
    documents sought for by the parties are supplied within seven days from
    today.
    [G.S.Singhvi]
    Chairman
    23rd February , 2015

    You might also like