Deep Eutectic Solvents - Syntheses, Properties and Applications
Deep Eutectic Solvents - Syntheses, Properties and Applications
Deep Eutectic Solvents - Syntheses, Properties and Applications
CRITICAL REVIEW
1. Introduction
In the past 20 years, room temperature ionic liquids (RTILs)
have attracted considerable attention especially in the elds of
This journal is
View Online
capable of forming a eutectic mixture. One of the most widespread components used for the formation of these DESs is
choline chloride (ChCl). ChCl is a very cheap, biodegradable
and non-toxic quaternary ammonium salt which can be either
extracted from biomass or readily synthesized from fossil reserves
(million metric tons) through a very high atom economy process.
In combination with safe hydrogen bond donors such as urea,
renewable carboxylic acids (e.g. oxalic, citric, succinic or amino
acids) or renewable polyols (e.g. glycerol, carbohydrates), ChCl is
capable of rapidly forming a DES. Although most of DESs are
made from ChCl as an ionic species, DESs cannot be considered
as ILs because (1) DESs are not entirely composed of ionic
species and (2) can also be obtained from non-ionic species.
As compared to the traditional ILs, DESs derived from ChCl
gather many advantages such as (1) low price, (2) chemical
inertness with water (i.e. easy storage), (3) easy to prepare since
DESs are obtained by simply mixing two components, thus
by-passing all problems of purication and waste disposal
generally encountered with ILs and (4) most of them are biodegradable,8 biocompatible9 and non-toxic,10 reinforcing the greenness of these media.11 Physico-chemical properties of DESs
(density, viscosity, refractive index, conductivity, surface tension,
chemical inertness, etc.) are very close to those of common ILs. For
this reason, DESs derived from ChCl are also familiarly named
biocompatible or biorenewable ionic liquids in a few studies.
Thanks to their low ecological footprint and attractive price, DESs
have now become of growing interest both at academic and
industrial levels and the number of publications dedicated to the
use of DESs is now rapidly increasing in the current literature,
further demonstrating the attractiveness of these media.
Sebastien Royer
2. Denition of DESs
A DES is generally composed of two or three cheap and safe
components which are capable of associating with each other,
This journal is
View Online
View Online
Table 1
Freezing point (Tf) of the reported DESs. Tm : melting point of pure HBD; RT = room temperature
ChCl : HBD (molar ratio)
Tm /1C
Urea
1:2
134
12
15
Thiourea
1:2
175
69
15
1-Methyl urea
1:2
93
29
15
1,3-Dimethyl urea
1:2
102
70
15
1,1-Dimethyl urea
1:2
180
149
15
Acetamide
1:2
80
51
15
Benzamide
1:2
129
92
15
Ethylene glycol
1:2
12.9
66
16
Glycerol
1:2
17.8
40
17,27
2,2,2-Triuoroacetamide
1 : 2.5
72
45
16
Imidazole
3:7
89
56
18
Adipic acid
1:1
153
85
14
Benzoic acid
1:1
122
95
14
Citric acid
1:1
149
69
14
Malonic acid
1:1
135
10
14
Oxalic acid
1:1
190
34
14
Phenylacetic acid
1:1
77
25
14
Phenylpropionic acid
1:1
48
20
14
Succinic acid
1:1
185
71
14
This journal is
Tf/1C
Ref.
View Online
Table 1
(continued )
ChCl : HBD (molar ratio)
Tm /1C
Tricarballylic acid
1:1
159
Levulinic acid
1:2
32
Itaconic acid
1:1
166
Xylitol
1:1
D-Sorbitol
1:1
L-(+)-Tartaric
acid
1 : 0.5
Ref.
90
14
Liquid at RT
19
57 3
19
96
Liquid at RT
19
99
Liquid at RT
19
47 3
19
Liquid at RT
19
171
D-Isosorbide
1:2
4-Hydroxybenzoic acid
1 : 0.5
215
87 3
19
Caeic acid
1 : 0.5
212
67 3
19
p-Coumaric acid
1 : 0.5
214
67 3
19
trans-Cinnamic acid
1:1
133
93 3
19
Suberic acid
1:1
142
93 3
19
Gallic acid
1 : 0.5
251
77 3
19
Resorcinol
1:4
110
87
20
Tf/1C
62
View Online
Table 2
Table 2 (continued )
Organic salts
Cation
Hydrogen
bond
Anion donor
(X) (HBD)
Salt :
HBD
(molar
ratio) Tf/1C Ref.
Urea
1:2
15
BF4
Urea
1:2
67
15
NO3
Urea
1:2
15
Cl
Urea
1:2
38
15
Br
Urea
1:2
113
15
Cl
1:2
14
Urea
1:2
33
15
Cl
Urea
1:2
15
15
Br
Urea
1:2
55
15
Br
Br
Cl
Br
Glycerol
Glycerol
Glycerol
Glycerol
Ethylene glycol
1:2
1:3
1:4
1:5
1:3
34
Cation
Hydrogen
bond
Anion donor
(X) (HBD)
Salt :
HBD
(molar
ratio) Tf/1C Ref.
Br
Ethylene glycol
1:4
50
21,27
Br
Ethylene glycol
1:5
48
21
Cl
Ethylene glycol
1:3
47.9
22
Br
Triethylene glycol 1 : 3
8
21
Br
Triethylene glycol 1 : 4
19
21
Br
Triethylene glycol 1 : 5
21
21
Cl
2,2,21:2
Triuoracetamide
91
22
Br
2,2,21:8
Triuoracetamide
69
22
Cl
Glycerol
1:2
1
26
Cl
Glycerol
1:3
1.7
26
Cl
Glycerol
1:4
26
Cl
Ethylene glycol
1:2
31
26
15
Cl
Br
Urea
Organic salts
21
5.5 21
15.6
50
46
21
21
21
This journal is
View Online
Table 2
(continued )
Organic salts
Cation
Hydrogen
bond
Anion donor
(X) (HBD)
Salt :
HBD
(molar
ratio) Tf/1C Ref.
Cl
1:3
Cl
Ethylene glycol
Ethylene glycol
1:4
22
21
26
26
This journal is
HBD
Salt : HBD
(mol : mol)
Density
(r, g cm3)
Ref.
EtNH3Cl
EtNH3Cl
EtNH3Cl
ChCl
AcChCl
ChCl
ZnCl2
ZnCl2
ZnCl2
ZnCl2
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
Et2(EtOH)NCla
Et2(EtOH)NCla
Et2(EtOH)NCla
Et2(EtOH)NCla
Et2(EtOH)NCla
Et2(EtOH)NCla
Me(Ph)3PBrc
Me(Ph)3PBrc
Me(Ph)3PBrc
Me(Ph)3PBrc
Me(Ph)3PBrc
Me(Ph)3PBrc
CF3CONH2
Acetamide
Urea
CF3CONH2
Urea
Urea
Urea
Acetamide
EG
Hexanediol
Glycerol
Glycerol
Glycerol
Glycerol
EGb
EG
Malonic acid
Glycerol
Glycerol
Glycerol
EG
EG
EG
Glycerol
Glycerol
Glycerol
EG
EG
EG
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.273
1.041
1.140
1.342
1.206
1.25
1.63
1.36
1.45
1.38
1.18
1.20
1.16
1.20
1.12
1.12
1.25
1.17
1.21
1.22
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.31
1.30
1.30
1.25
1.23
1.22
23
23
23
23
23
23,24
12
12
12
12
25,27
25
26
26
25,26
25,26
24
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
1.5
1.5
1.5
2
2
2
3.5
4
4
3
2
3
1
3
2
3
2
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
3
4
6
a
Et2(EtOH)NCl: N,N-diethylenethanol ammonium chloride. b EG is
ethylene glycol. c Me(Ph)3PBr:methyltriphenylphosphonium bromide.
View Online
Viscosity
Organic
Salts
HBD
Viscosities
(cP)
Ref.
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ZnCl2
Bu4NBr
EtNH3Cl
EtNH3Cl
EtNH3Cl
AcChCl
Bu4NBr
Urea
Urea
EG
EG
EG
EG
Glucose
Glycerol
Glycerol
Glycerol
Glycerol
1,4-Butanediol
1,4-Butanediol
CF3CONH2
Imidazole
ZnCl2
Xylitol
Sorbitol
Malonic acid
Urea
Imidazole
CF3CONH2
Acetamide
Urea
Urea
Imidazole
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
3
24
23
25
24
25
25
19
25
24
25
25
25
25
23
18
29
19
19
24
25
18
23
23
23
23
18
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
2
2
2
2
3
4
1
2
2
3
4
3
4
2
7
2
1
1
2
3.5
7
1.5
1.5
1.5
2
7
This journal is
View Online
3.4
Polarity
maxNA
(1)
Ionic conductivity
Molar ratio of
ChCl: Glycerol
ET(30)/kcal mol1
Glycerol
ChCl: Glycerol
ChCl: Glycerol
ChCl: Glycerol
ChCl: Glycerol
1:
1:
1:
1:
57.17
57.96
58.28
58.21
58.49
Table 6
3
2
1.5
1
(2)
Salts
HBD
Salt : HBD
(mol : mol)
Conductivity
(k, mS cm1)
Ref.
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ChCl
ZnCl2
Bu4NBr
EtNH3Cl
EtNH3Cl
EtNH3Cl
AcChCl
Bu4NBr
Urea
EG
Glycerol
1,4-Butanediol
CF3CONH2
Imidazole
ZnCl2
Urea
Imidazole
CF3CONH2
Acetamide
Urea
Urea
Imidazole
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
3
23
25
25
25
23
18
29
29
18
23
23
23
23
18
This journal is
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
2
2
2
3
2
7
2
3.5
7
1.5
1.5
1.5
2
7
View Online
3.7
Surface tension
CO2 solubility
CuO
Fe3O4
ZnO
ChCl/malonic acid
ChCl/oxalic acid
ChCl/phenylpropionic acid
0.246
0.071
0.473
0.071
0.341
0.014
0.554
0.491
>0.491
This journal is
View Online
Table 8
Metal oxides
mp/1C
Solubility /ppm
Al2O3
CaO
CuO
Cu2O
Fe2O3
Fe3O4
MnO2
NiO
PbO2
ZnO
2045
2580
1326
1235
1565
1538
535
1990
888
1975
o1
6
470
8725
49
40
493
325
9157
8466
View Online
5. Catalysis in DESs
In the eld of catalysis, the choice of the solvent is crucial. The
solvent not only allows a better contact between reactants and
catalysts but also determines the choice of work-up procedures
and recycling (including the catalyst) or disposal strategies. In
this context, the search of cheap and safe media for catalysis
has become a very important topic. Recently, ILs have
received considerable attention, especially for the stabilization
of nanoparticles, the immobilization of homogeneous catalysts, the catalytic conversion of renewable raw materials
(i.e. biomass, CO2), among others. Comprehensive reviews
covering this topic can be found in the current literature.41
Although fascinating results have been reported, ecological
and economical footprint of these ILs-based processes still
remains at an unacceptable level for an industrial application.
As mentioned earlier, DESs exhibit similar properties to ILs.
Hence, much eort is devoted to the use of DESs as cheap and
safe solvents for catalysis. In this section, advances reported in
the utilization of DESs for catalysis will be discussed.
5.1 Base-catalyzed reactions
In 2010, Shankarling and co-workers reported the electrophilic
substitution of 1-aminoanthra-9,10-quinone derivatives in the
This journal is
View Online
Scheme 4 Base-catalyzed Knovenagel in the ChClurea (1 : 2) system. (Adapted from ref. 45.)
This journal is
View Online
L-carnitine/
Scheme 7 Mono-N-alkylation of aniline with hexyl bromide in ChClderived DES. (Adapted from ref. 48.)
PLLA chain started to crystallize out of the melt, incorporation of TMC occurred (Scheme 6).
In 2011, Shankarling and co-workers reported that ChCl/
urea and ChCl/glycerol DESs can be used as both catalyst and
solvent for the mono-N-alkylation of aromatic amines.48 In
particular, the ChClurea eutectic mixture was more ecient
than the ChClglycerol DES, presumably due to its higher
basicity (Scheme 7). This methodology was tolerant to a wide
range of substrates since various aromatic amines and alkyl
bromides were successfully reacted aording, at 50 1C, the
corresponding mono-N-alkylated amines with 7089% yield.
At the end of the reaction, products were selectively extracted
from the ChClurea eutectic mixture by liquidliquid phase
extraction using ethylacetate. Hence, the authors successfully
recycled the DES at least 5 times without noticeable decrease
of yield, thereby oering an alternative route to lipasecatalyzed reaction for which a deactivation of the enzyme
was observed cycle after cycle.
5.2
Acid-catalyzed reactions
Acid-catalyzed dehydration of hexoses to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) has gained considerable attention in recent
years since HMF is a valuable molecule platform, especially
for the fabrication of safer polymers and fuel additives.49 In
most of the works, acid-catalyzed dehydration of hexoses to
HMF is achieved in imidazolium-based ILs for three reasons:
(1) imidazolium-based ILs can dissolve large amounts of
Chem. Soc. Rev.
Catalyst
Fructose/
Inulin/
Glucose/
Sucrose/
ChCl (2 : 3), ChCl
ChCl (1 : 1), ChCl (1 : 1),
70 1C
(2 : 3) nd 80 1C
80 1C
FeCl3
ZnCl2
CrCl2
CrCl3
pTsOH
Sc(OTf)3
A15
Montmorillonite
59
8
40
60
67
55
40
49
55
3
36
46
57
44
54
7
15
6
45
31
15
9
9
7
27
6
62
43
25
28
27
35
This journal is
View Online
As described above, in a biphasic system (ChCloxalic acidethylacetate), the yield of HMF can be slightly improved up to
64%. After separation of the ethylacetate phase containing
HMF, the ChCl/oxalic acid was recycled at least 6 times
without appreciable loss of HMF yield.
In a similar way, De Oliveira Vigier et al. reported that
betaine hydrochloride (BHC), a side product of the sugar beet
industry, can be used as a renewably sourced Bronsted acid in
combination with ChCl and water for the production of HMF
from fructose and inulin.53 In a ternary mixture ChCl
BHCwater (10/0.5/2), HMF was produced with 63% yield
(at 130 1C from 40 wt% of fructose). As observed by Han and
co-workers, when the reaction was performed in a biphasic
system using methylisobutylketone (MIBK) as an extraction
solvent, HMF was recovered with a purity higher than 95%
and an isolated yield of 84% (from 10 wt% of fructose),
further demonstrating that these systems similarly behave like
traditional imidazolium-derived ILs (Scheme 8). Here also, the
ChClBHCwater system was successfully recycled 7 times. In
the same work, the authors have shown that the dehydration
of fructose to HMF can also conveniently take place in a
BHCglycerol (1 : 1) mixture. Although 51% yield of HMF
was obtained at 110 1C (from 10 wt% of fructose), extraction
of HMF from the BHC/glycerol medium remained very
dicult due to the very high solubility of HMF in this mixture.
One should comment that the recent progress reported in
the eld of ChCl-derived DESs now oers suitable ways for
the catalytic conversion of valuable renewable raw materials
such as starch, lignin and cellulose.54 It makes no doubt
that DESs will denitely contribute to the catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass in a more rational way and
thus to the emergence of new bio-based chemicals in a close
future.55
Acid-catalyzed reactions in DESs have been also explored
to access higher value added chemicals. In 2009, Zou and
co-workers reported the a,a-dichlorination of acetophenone
derivatives in an acidic DES composed of ChCl and p-toluene
sulfonic acid (p-TsOH) mixed in a ratio of 1 : 1.56 When the
ratio DES/acetophenone was 2 : 1, the a,a-dichlorinated
adduct was obtained with 86% yield at room temperature
and in the presence of 1,3-dichloro-5,5-dimethylhydantoin as a
chlorinating agent (Scheme 9). At the end of the reaction, the
a,a-dichlorinated adduct was easily and selectively extracted
from the ChCl/pTsOH DES using methyltertiobutylether as
an extraction solvent, thereby allowing the authors to successfully recycle such DES at least 5 times.
In 2002, Davies and co-workers have reported the possible
DielsAlder reaction in ChCl/MCl2 (M = Zn or Sn).57 The
Lewis acid nature of these eutectic mixtures signicantly
enhanced the reaction rate. Various dienes and dienophiles
were reacted in ChCl/MCl2, aording the DielsAlder adduct
This journal is
View Online
Melt
T/1C
Yield (%)
Endo/exo
ratio
Fructose/DMU (7 : 3)
Maltose/DMU/NH4Cl (5 : 4 : 1)
Lactose/DMU/NH4Cl (6 : 3 : 1)
Mannitol/DMU/NH4Cl (5 : 4 : 1)
Glucose/urea/CaCl2 (5 : 4 : 1)
Sorbitol/DMU/NH4Cl (7 : 2 : 1)
Sorbitol/DMU/NH4Cla (7 : 2 : 1)
71
83
88
89
75
67
67
Quant.
79
83
74
76
Quant.
Quant.
2.9
3.3
3.6
2.7
3.2
5.0
6.0
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
View Online
Scheme 12 Palladium-catalyzed Suzuki coupling in various carbohydrateureainorganic salts eutectic mixtures. (Adapted from ref. 62.)
This journal is
View Online
Table 11 Yield of butylvalerate obtained by transesterication of
ethyl valerate by butanol at 60 1C in the presence of various enzymes
Biocatalysis in DESs
Solvent
iCALBa
CALBb
CALAc
PCLd
ChCl/acetamide
ChCl/glycerol
ChCl/malonic acid
ChCl/urea
Toluene
23
96
30
93
92
96
96
58
99
92
0.5
70
0.7
1.6
76
0.0
22
0.0
0.8
5.0
View Online
Table 12 Activity and selectivity of Novozyms 435 in the transesterication of ethylsorbate with 1-propanol
Solvent
Selectivity (%)
t-Butanol
1-Propanol
Glycerol
ChCl/urea (1 : 2)
ChCl/glycerol (1 : 2)
ChOAc/glycerol (1 : 2)
ChOAc/EG (1 : 2)a
ChOAc/glycerol (1 : 2)
0.57
0.10
0.71
1.00
1.12
0.21
0.07
1.02
>99
>99
38
>99
45
40
12b
99
EG = ethylene glycol.
selectivity.
Solvent
Proteasea
Water
Sel.
content Activity/
(v/v)% mmol min1 g1 (%)
t-Butanol
ChOAc/glycerol (1 : 1.5)
ChOAc/glycerol (1 : 1.5)
ChOAc/glycerol (1 : 1.5)
ChCl/glycerol (1 : 2)
ChCl/glycerol (1 : 2)
ChCl/glycerol (1 : 2)
ChCl/glycerol (1 : 2)
S/Chit
S/Chit
S/Chit
S/Chit
Free a-C
a-C/Chit
a-C/Chit
S/Chit
2
2
3
4
2
2
3
3
0.50
0.42
0.40
0.90
0.028
0.031
0.75
2.90
29
99
99
99
99
99
99
98
View Online
Melt
T/1C
Yield (%)
Citric acid/DMU (4 : 6)
Fructose/DMU (7 : 3)
Tartaric acid/DMU (3 : 7)
Tartaric acid/ChCl (5 : 5)
Mannose/DMU/NH4Cl (5 : 4 : 1)
Lactose/DMU/NH4Cl (5 : 4 : 1)
Maltose/DMU/NH4Cl (5 : 4 : 1)
65
71
70
90
89
88
84
85
75
82
89
82
86
92
7. Electrochemistry in DESs
The earliest research studies on ionic uids started with the
purpose of electrochemical application, viz. Humphrey Davys
pioneering works on the electrodeposition of simple molten
salts. Due to their unique properties, ILs found a wide range of
applications in various electrochemical devices including for
instance lithium ion batteries, fuel cells, super capacitors, dye
sensitized solar cells, etc. Similar to ILs, DESs were also used
in electrochemistry as electrolytes for electrodeposition of
metal, as solvents for electrochemistry reaction and for
electropolishing (metal dissolution), etc.
7.1 Electrodeposition
Electrodeposition is a process leading to the formation of solid
materials by electrochemical reactions in a liquid phase. The
setup is composed of a three-electrode electrochemical cell
(a reference electrode, a specially designed cathode, and an
anode or counter electrode). In a very simple way, the metal
(cationic form) contained in the electrolyte is reduced at the
cathode and deposited as metal as shown in Fig. 6.
Electrodeposition of metals is widely used to functionalize
surfaces for corrosion-resistance, electrocatalysis, magnetic
applications, photoactive semiconductors (photovoltaics) electrotypes in the printing industry and hardening of steel for
engineered components or in electronic industries for the
production of printed circuit boards.76 Electrodeposition of
metals can be performed in the presence of various solvents
but this process is obviously limited by the redox potential
windows of the considered solvent. Electrolytes should indeed
have a high resistance against electrochemical reduction and
This journal is
View Online
View Online
This journal is
View Online
This leads to the formation of copper chloride-based complexes. The authors have demonstrated that in this system the
energy eciency of electrodeposition can be double because
(i) the cathodic eciency is very high and (ii) the low oxidation
state of metal complexes is stable.
Ag was also successfully electrodeposited on a Cu electrode
in ChCl/ethylene glycol DES.99 It was shown that silver can
not only oxidize copper but can also be deposited on the
copper surface at the same time. The deposit of silver was
nano-crystalline and gave a smooth shiny coating. Later, the
same team has studied the electrodeposition of silver using a
platinum working electrode.100 As mentioned earlier, AgCl
was found to be highly soluble in this DES (0.2 mol kg1).
When SiC was added to the solution of AgCl in ChCl/ethylene
glycol, the viscosity decreased due to microstirring eects.
Morphology of the Ag deposit was not aected by the
presence of SiC. A similar trend was observed in the case of
Al2O3. Note that the Ag particle size is however smaller in the
presence of SiC microparticles. The authors have also shown
that upon incorporation of SiC, the hardness of recovered Ag
in DES is higher than in aqueous solution. Note that the
hardness of metallic Ag did not depend on the SiC particles
size (from 50 nm to 2 mm). Incorporation of SiC or Al2O3 has,
however, an eect on the friction coecient and wear volume
of the Ag-based deposit. In particular, in the presence of
Al2O3, Ag particles are less abrasive. Since lithium salts are
known to modify the mechanism of metal nucleation and the
mechanical properties of the deposited lms, the addition of
LiF during the deposition of Ag was also investigated. The
hardness was greatly improved, but the structure of the
Ag/SiC lm was unchanged with the addition of 1 wt% of
LiF. Later, Tu et al. have performed the deposition of Ag on
copper alloys.101 They have shown that at 0 1C or at 50 1C a
self-assembled nanoporous network of Ag lms with ligament
or channel structure was obtained.
Saravanan and co-workers have shown that electrodeposition
of a CrCo alloy is also feasible in ChCl/ethylene glycol DES,
opening an interesting route for the replacement of common
noble metal alloys in dentistry.102 The authors have used an
anode made of graphite and a cathode composed of a brass
and mild-steel plates. Two electrodeposition methods were
developed (i) direct current deposition (DCD) and (ii) pulsed
electrodeposition (PED). In the DCD method, an alloy
composed of 80.04% of Co and 19.95% of Cr was obtained
with a nodular grain shape with sizes ranging from 24 mm.
From the PED method, the recovered alloy was composed
of 65.44% of Co and 34.56% of Cr with particle sizes ranging
from 12.5 mm.
The electrodeposition of nickel was also performed at 90 1C
in ChCl/ethylene glycol on polished brass foil (Cu0.64Zn0.36
alloy).103 A highly rough surface was obtained at 90 1C while it
is not the case at room temperature. Nickel is randomly
distributed on the lm. Nanosheets with a thickness of
1020 nm and grains with 1050 nm size were obtained.
Clearly, the authors have highlighted an increase in the Ni
deposit roughness with the temperature. This was explained by
a decrease of the DES viscosity, leading to an increase of ion
species mobility, favouring the nucleation and deposition
process of nickel. Moreover, the authors have shown that
This journal is
View Online
View Online
View Online
View Online
View Online
Fig. 14 ZrPOF-EA framework structure showing (a) the characteristic [41482] unit, (b) the projection along the c-axis with the [41482]
units highlighted, and (c) the projection along the a axis. Bridging O
atoms have been omitted for clarity. Terminal O atoms and bridging F
atoms are shown as balls, Zr gray, and P black.138 (Reproduced with
permission from ref. 138. Copyright (2011) Wiley-VCH.)
This journal is
View Online
It comprises FeIIIO6 octahedra connected by HPO42 tetrahedra and bisbidentate oxalate (C2O42) anions to form a 3D
framework. Fig. 15 shows that the tunnels parallel to the [100]
direction have a window formed by six FeO6 octahedra and six
phosphate tetrahedra. The second kind of tunnel is formed by
six octahedra, four tetrahedra and two oxalate units. The
intersecting 12-ring channels form the 3D open structure,
with the framework charge-compensating Cs+ cations being
located at the intersections of these channels (Fig. 15).
Another structure (not shown), is obtained from the same
reactants but without 1,4-bis(3-aminopropyl)piperazine (APPIP),
resulting in a higher pH of the solution during the preparation
of the material. This material FeIIIO6 octahedra coordinate to
C2O42, H2PO4 and HPO42 anions to form macroanionic
layers, with Cs+ cations located between the layers. Four
FeO6 octahedra, connected to three HPO42 tetrahedra and
one oxalate unit form eight-membered windows in the layers.
The H2PO4 tetrahedra, positioned between the chains, stabilize
the 2D-layer structure.
For information, these materials cannot be prepared by a
hydrothermal method under similar reaction conditions pushing
forward the contribution of DESs for the ionothermal synthesis of new materials (even if no template eect is evidenced
in this study).
8.1.6 Metal oxalatophosphites. In line with their previous
research on photoluminescence properties of open framework
metallophosphate, i.e. NTHU-4 and NTHU-6,141 Wang et al.
demonstrated the successful synthesis of another luminescent
gallium oxalatophosphite in ChCl/oxalic acid dihydrate DES
(NTHU-7) (Fig. 16). The nanosized channel structure emits
Chem. Soc. Rev.
View Online
Fig. 17 (a) The structures of dierent DESs and (b) their multiple
roles in the ionothermal synthesis of MOFs (M = metal).145 (Reproduced
with permission from ref. 145. Copyright (2009) Wiley-VCH.)
This journal is
View Online
View Online
Organicinorganic hybrids
ionothermal synthesis of new materials. Besides metal phosphates with open-framework structures and MOFs, hybrid
polyoxometalate materials were also successfully synthesized
in DESs. Wang and co-workers151 rst reported the use of
DESs to prepare polyoxometalate (POM)-based hybrids.
By using the ChCl/urea DES as the reaction solvent,
two new compounds, [(CH3)3N(CH2)2OH]4[b-Mo8O26] (1)
and {(N2H5CO)[(CH3)3N(CH2)2OH]2}[Cr-Mo6O24H6]4H2O
(2), were successfully obtained at 30 1C starting from
Na2MoO4 2H2O and Cr(NO3)39H2O as precursors for
materials 1 and 2, respectively. Owing to an important hydrogen
bond network between organic cations and polyoxoanions, both
compounds exhibit a 3D supramolecular framework (Fig. 19).
For material 1, b-octamolybdate isopolyanion [b-Mo8O26]4
and four choline cations constitute the structural unit. The
polyoxoanion consists in eight {MoO6} edge-shared. The structural unit of material 2 is composed of one [CrMo6O24H6]3
Anderson-type anion, two choline cations, one protonated
urea molecule and four molecules of water. Subsequently,
three new polyoxometalate (POM)-based hybrids were
successfully synthesized in the DES ChCl/urea by the same
group.152 During the material syntheses, the decomposition
of urea was avoided thanks to the mild reaction conditions
(e.g. room temperature).
Consequently, the urea molecule was preserved in two
POM-based hybrid materials. The choline cations not only
act as the counter cation, but can also enter into the nal
structure of the material. In the basic structural unit of the rst
material, the [IMo6O24]5 Anderson type anion links with
one [Na2(H2O)6]2+ cation, two choline cations, one
protonated water molecule and one lattice water molecule: {[(CH3)3N(CH2)2OH]2(H3O)}[Na2(H2O)6][IMo6O24]H2O.
This journal is
View Online
Nanoparticles
View Online
The injection rate of the ZnO-containing DES in the antisolvent solution also has a strong impact on the nal
morphology (compare Fig. 21 (1) injection time = 5 s and
(2) injection time = 5 h). Under slow injection conditions,
nanorods and ower-assembled nanorods of dierent sizes can
be obtained.
Additionally, monoclinic structured spindly bismuth vanadate
microtubes were prepared on a large scale by a simple ionothermal treatment in a ChClurea eutectic mixture, starting
from ammonium metavanadate, bismuth nitrate hydrate and
water.158 The obtained BiVO4 microtubes exhibited spindle
shape and saw-toothed structure. The authors studied the
time-dependant structure growth. For the spindle shaped
BiVO4, the growth mechanism was ascribed to a reactioncrystallization process controlled by the BiOCl concentration
and to a nucleation-growth process of nanosheets induced by
adsorbed solvent molecules on the microtube surfaces.
The obtained spindly microtubes exhibited much higher
visible-light photocatalytic activity for the rhodamine B
decolorization than that of bulk BiVO4 prepared by classical
solid-state reaction (thermal crystallization at 700 1C between
Bi(NO3)35H2O and NH4VO3). Dierence is attributed to the
larger surface and improved crystallinity of the DES-derived
mixed oxide.
8.5 Carbon materials
Porous carbon materials are extensively used for various
applications, including catalyst supports, electrochemical
devices, gas storage and separation, etc. Ionothermal synthesis
has been proven to be an ecient route for the preparation of
crystalline porous materials. Within this context, ILs have also
been recently demonstrated to be versatile precursors for the
preparation of porous carbon materials.159,160 In a similar
way, synthesis of porous carbon materials can be achieved in
DESs as reported by the group of del Monte. For example, the
resorcinol-formaldehyde (RF) polycondensation in DESs for
the preparation of carbons and carboncarbon nanotube
composites has been recently documented.161 During the
polycondensation of resorcinol and formaldehyde, hydroxymethyl species are formed. These hydroxymethyl species react
to form methylene and methylene ether bridged compounds. A
well-documented study is then given by these authors where
eects of water, catalyst, and the role of the DES (by comparison
with classical aqueous conditions) was systematically investigated. During the material preparation, the RF polycondensation rstly occurred in a ChCl/ethylene glycol DES. Then, the
resulting RF gels were carbonized to form monolithic carbons.
Conversely to the use of water, all RF gels prepared in DESs
exhibit similar textures, which is an interesting property of
DESs. Conversion rate and carbon content in the nal material are similar to those obtained using the classical route. After
the thermal treatment of these gels, surface areas of carbon
materials were largely improved. Another interesting point
concerns the ability of DES to disperse carbon nanotubes,
resulting in the formation of homogeneous carboncarbon
nanotube RF gels. Such a high composite homogeneity cannot
be obtained in water due to the poor dispersibility of nanotubes in such a medium.
This journal is
View Online
This journal is
View Online
This journal is
View Online
22 M. A. Kareem, F. S. Mjalli, M. A. Hashim and I. M. AlNashef,
J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2010, 55, 46324637.
23 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper and S. Gray, ChemPhysChem, 2006, 7,
803806.
24 C. DAgostino, R. C. Harris, A. P. Abbott, L. F. Gladden and
M. D. Mantle, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 2138321391.
25 A. P. Abbott, R. C. Harris and K. S. Ryder, J. Phys. Chem. B,
2007, 111, 49104913.
26 K. Shahbaz, S. Baroutian, F. S. Mjalli, M. A. Hashim and
I. M. AlNashef, Thermochim. Acta, 2012, 527, 5966.
27 A. P. Abbott, R. C. Harris, k. S. Ryder, C. DAgostino,
L. F. Gladden and M. D. Mantle, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 8290.
28 K. Shahbaz, F. S. Mjalli, M. A. Hashim and I. M. AlNashef,
Thermochim. Acta, 2011, 515, 6772.
29 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, D. L. Davies and R. Rasheed, Inorg.
Chem., 2004, 43, 34473452.
30 M. G. D. Popolo, J. Kohano and R. M. Lynden-Bell, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 2006, 110, 87988803.
31 W. Li, Z. Zhang, B. Han, S. Hu, J. Song, Y. Xie and X. Zhou,
Green Chem., 2008, 10, 11421145.
32 X. Li, M. Hou, B. Han, X. Wang and L. Zou, J. Chem. Eng. Data,
2008, 53, 548550.
33 W. C. Su, D. S. H. Wong and M. H. Li, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2009,
54, 19511955.
34 A. P. Abbott, G. Frisch, J. Hartley and K. S. Ryder, Green Chem.,
2011, 13, 471481.
35 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper and P. Shikotra, Trans. Inst. Min.
Metall., Sect. C, 2006, 115, 1518.
36 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, D. L. Davies, K. J. McKenzie and
Stephen U. Obi, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2006, 51, 12801282.
37 J. M. Rimsza and L. R. Corrales, Comput. Theor. Chem., 2012,
987(1), 5761.
38 H. G. Morrison, C. C. Sun and S. Neervannan, Int. J. Pharm.,
2009, 378, 136139.
39 I. Mamajanov, A. E. Engelhart, H. D. Bean and N. V. Hud,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 63106314.
40 A. P. Abbott, P. M. Cullis, M. J. Gibson, R. C. Harris and
E. Raven, Green Chem., 2007, 9, 868872.
41 (a) F. Jutz, J. Andanson and A. Baiker, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111,
322353; (b) V. I. Parvulescu and C. Hardacre, Chem. Rev., 2007,
107, 26152665; (c) F. Rantwijk and R. A. Sheldon, Chem. Rev.,
2007, 107, 27572785.
42 S. B. Phadtare and G. S. Shankarling, Green Chem., 2010, 12,
458462.
43 (a) Y. Jung and R. A. Marcus, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129,
54925502; (b) R. Breslow, Acc. Chem. Res., 1991, 24, 159164;
(c) A. Lubineau, J. Auge and Y. Queneau, Synthesis, 1994,
741760.
44 P. M. Pawar, K. J. Jarag and G. S. Shankarling, Green Chem.,
2011, 13, 21302134.
45 Y. A. Sonawane, S. B. Phadtare, B. N. Borse, A. R. Jagtap and
G. S. Shankarling, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 14561459.
46 F. Ilgen and B. Konig, Green Chem., 2009, 11, 848854.
47 O. Coulembier, V. Lemaur, T. Josse, A. Minoia, J. Cornil and
P. Dubois, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 723726.
48 B. Singh, H. Lobo and G. Shankarling, Catal. Lett., 2011, 141,
178182.
49 (a) E. Zakrzewska Malgorzata, E. Bogel-Lukasik and R. BogelLukasik, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111(2), 397417; (b) R. Karinen,
K. Vilonen and M. Niemela, ChemSusChem, 2011, 4(8), 10021016.
50 S. Hu, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhou, B. Han, H. Fan, W. Li, J. Song and
Y. Xie, Green Chem., 2008, 10, 12801283.
51 H. Zhao, J. E. Holladay, H. Brown and Z. C. Zhang, Science,
2007, 316, 15971600.
52 S. Hu, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhou, J. Song, H. Fan and B. Han, Green
Chem., 2009, 11, 873877.
53 K. de Oliveira Vigier, A. Benguerba, J. Barrault and F. Jerome,
Green Chem., 2012, 14, 285289.
54 (a) A. Biswas, R. L. Shogren, D. G. Stevenson, J. L. Willett and
P. K. Bhowmik, Carbohydr. Polym., 2006, 66, 546550;
(b) A. P. Abbott, T. J. Bell, S. Handa and B. Stoddart, Green
Chem., 2005, 7, 705707.
55 As a recent example please see A. P. Abbott, A. D. Ballantyne,
J. Palenzuela Conde, K. S. Ryder and W. R. Wise, Green Chem.,
2012, 14, 13021037.
This journal is
View Online
83 M. Steichen, M. Thomassey, S. Siebentritt and P. J. Dale, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 4292.
84 H. Yang, X. Guo, N. Birbilis, G. Wu and W. Ding, Appl. Surf.
Sci., 2011, 257, 90949102.
85 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, D. L. Davies, K. J. McKenzie and
S. U. Obi, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2006, 51, 12801282.
86 P. Martis, V. S. Dilimon, J. Delhalle and Z. Mekhalif, Electrochim.
Acta, 2010, 55, 54075410.
87 A. P. Abbott, K. El Ttaib, K. S. Ryder and E. L. Smith, Trans.
Inst. Met. Finish., 2008, 86, 234240.
88 H. Y. Yang, W. Guo, X. B. Chen, S. H. Wang, G. H. Wu,
W. J. Ding and N. Birbilis, Electrochim. Acta, 2012, 63, 131138.
89 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, K. J. McKenzie and K. S. Ryder,
J. Electroanal. Chem., 2007, 599, 288294.
90 P. Dale, A. P. Samantilleke, D. D. Shivagan and L. M. Peter, Thin
Solid Films, 2007, 515, 57515754.
91 A. Bakkar and V. Neubert, Electrochem. Commun., 2007, 9,
24282435.
92 D. Yue, Y. Jia, Y. Yao, J. Sun and Y. Jing, Electrochim. Acta,
2012, 65, 3036.
93 E. L. Smith, J. C. Barron, A. P. Abbott and K. S. Ryder, Anal.
Chem., 2009, 81, 84668471.
94 A. P. Abbott, J. C. Barron, G. Frisch, K. S. Ryder and
A. Fernando Silva, Electrochim. Acta, 2011, 56, 52725279.
95 A. P. Abbott, J. C. Barron, G. Frisch, S. Gurman, K. S. Ryder
and A. Fernando Silva, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13,
1022410231.
96 A. Sun, H. Zhao and J. Zheng, Talanta, 2012, 88, 259264.
97 A. P. Abbott, K. ElTtaib, G. Frisch and K. J. McKenzie, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 2009, 11, 42694277.
98 D. Lloyd, T. Vainikka, L. Murtomaki, K. Kontturi and
E. Ahlberg, Electrochim. Acta, 2011, 56, 49424948.
99 A. P. Abbott, S. Nandhra, S. Postlethwark, E. Smith and
K. S. Ryder, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2007, 9, 37353743.
100 A. P. Abbott, K. El Ttaib, G. Frisch, K. S. Ryder and D. Weston,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 24432449.
101 C. D. Gu, X. J. Xu and J. P. Tu, J. Phys. Chem., 2010, 114,
1361413619.
102 G. Saravanan and S. Mohan, J. Alloys Compounds, 2012, 522,
162166.
103 C. Gu and J. Tu, Langmuir, 2011, 27, 1013210140.
104 M. A. Skopek, M. A. Mohamoud, K. S. Ryder and
A. R. Hillman, Chem. Commun., 2009, 935937.
105 K. Haerens, E. Matthijs, K. Binnemans and B. Ven Der Bruggen,
Green Chem., 2009, 11, 13571365.
106 M. Figueiredo, C. Gomes, E. Costa, A. Martins, C. M. Pereira
and F. Silva, Electrochim. Acta, 2009, 54, 26302634.
107 B. G. Pollet, J. Y. Hihn and T. J. Mason, Electrochim. Acta, 2008,
53, 42484256.
108 C. A. Nkuku and R. J. LeSuer, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2007, 111,
1327113277.
109 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, D. L. Davies and R. K. Rasheed,
Chem.Eur. J., 2004, 10, 37693774.
110 H.-R. Jhong, D. Shan-Hill Wog, C.-C. Wan, Y.-Y. Wang and
T.-C. Wei, Electrochem. Commun., 2009, 11, 209211.
111 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, K. J. McKenzie and K. S. Ryder,
Electrochim. Acta, 2006, 51, 44204425.
112 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, K. J. McKenzie, A. Glidle and
K. S. Ryder, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 42144221.
113 A. P. Abbott, G. Frisch, S. J. Gurma, A. R. Hillman, J. Hartley,
F. Holyoak and K. S. Ryder, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47,
1003110033.
114 S. Ramesh, R. Shanti and E. Morris, J. Mater. Sci., 2012, 47,
17871793.
115 S. Ramesh, R. Shanti and E. Morris, Carbohydr. Polym., 2012,
87, 701706.
116 S. Ramesh, R. Shanti and E. Morris, J. Mol. Liq., 2012, 166, 4043.
117 (a) D. Freudenmann, S. Wolf, M. Wol and C. Feldmann,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 1105011060; (b) Z. Ma,
J. Yu and S. Dai, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 261285.
118 (a) E. R. Parnham and R. E. Morris, Acc. Chem. Res., 2007, 40,
10051013; (b) R. E. Morris, Chem. Commun., 2009, 29902998;
A. Taubert, Acta Chim. Slov., 2005, 52, 183186.
119 E. R. Cooper, C. D. Andrews, P. S. Wheatley, P. B. Webb,
P. Wormald and R. E. Morris, Nature, 2004, 430, 10121016.
This journal is
View Online
This journal is