ACTA ICHTHYOLOGICA ET PISCATORIA (2012) 42 (3): 153164

DOI: 10.3750/AIP2011.42.3.01

ENDEMIC FISHES OF THE CORTEZ BIOGEOGRAPHIC PROVINCE

(EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN)

Deivis S. PALACIOS-SALGADO 1, 2*, Luis A. BURNES-ROMO 2, 3, Jos J. TAVERA 4,

and Arturo RAMREZ-VALDEZ 5, 6
1 Escuela

Nacional de Ingeniera Pesquera, Universidad Autnoma de Nayarit, Baha de Matanchn,

San Blas Nayarit, Mxico
2 IIKKAKNAB A.C. Baha Asuncin 181, Col. Fovissste, 23060, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico
3 Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganadera, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentacin (SAGARPA).
4 Centro de Investigaciones Biolgicas del Noroeste, S.C. (CIBNOR), Mexico
5Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Universidad Autnoma de Baja California (UABC),
Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico
6 Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanolgicas (IIO), UABC, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico

Palacios-Salgado D.S., Burnes-Romo L.A., Tavera J.J., Ramrez-Valdez A. 2012. Endemic fishes of the
Cortez Biogeographic Province (eastern Pacific Ocean). Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 42 (3): 153164.

Background. The Cortez Province (CP) is located in the transitional warm-temperate/subtropical region that
allows the ichthyological component inhabiting it to be a mixture of elements of different biogeographic affinities. Since the first systematic analysis of the fish fauna of the Gulf of California in the 1960s a major portion
of the endemic species was recognized. Subsequently, a total of 31 new endemic species have been described in
the CP. This study constitutes an amendment of the fish component of the CP, including the most relevant ecological attributes of the species, along with an updated taxonomic list.
Materials and methods. A comprehensive literature review was made, considering current biological knowledge, and taxonomic status of the endemic species from the CP. Those fish species with restricted distribution
ranges, falling within the limits of this province, were considered endemic. Additionally, and to recognize the
dominant ecological attributes of the CP endemic species, the preferential habitat, bathymetric distribution, the
reproduction strategy, and the maximum total length (TL) were recorded.
Results. Seventy-nine endemic species were recognized and grouped in 13 orders, 29 families, and 59 genera.
Gobiidae (12), Chaenopsidae (8), and Labrisomidae (7) are the families with the highest species richness,
and Sebastes (6 species), the most diverse genus. Forty-five percent of the species are associated with coral and
rocky reefs, with 35% distributed within the first 10 m depth layer. The dominant reproduction strategies are:
oviparous with benthic eggs and pelagic larval phase (48.7%), and oviparous with pelagic eggs (25.6%). More
than half of the species (52%) are shorter than 10 cm (total length).
Conclusion. The list of endemic species presented in this study is not conclusive, still undescribed species have
not been included, detected differences (morphologic and/or genetic) in several species with disjunct populations
may increase the diversity of this province.
Keywords: Gulf of California, endemic species, biogeography, Gobiidae

INTRODUCTION
The Gulf of California (GC) represents one of the
worlds most productive sea areas including an important
diversity of marine environments (e.g., rocky- and coraline reefs, oceanic trenches, lagoons, and wetlands)
(Thomson et al. 2000, Thomson and Gilligan 2002,
Brusca et al. 2005). The GC oceanographic conditions,
geographic location, and geological history have deeply
*

influenced speciation processes and species accumulation, which may explain why this area includes the second
highest peak in species richness within the Tropical
Eastern Pacific (TEP) (Mora and Robertson 2005,
Robertson and Allen, 2008). Its location in the transitional warm-temperate and subtropical biogeographic region
allows the fishes inhabiting to be a mixture of elements
from different affinities: tropical, subtropical, temperate,

Correspondence: Dr. Deivis S. Palacios Salgado, Escuela Nacional de Ingeniera Pesquera, Coleccin ictiolgica, Apartado Postal 10, San Blas, Nayarit.
Mxico 63740, phone: (+323) 231-21-20, e-mail: [email protected].

154

Palacios-Salgado et al.

and arctic-boreal or warm-temperate (Walker 1960,

Castro-Aguirre et al. 1995, Hastings et al. 2010).
Given the high number of reported endemisms from
different taxonomic groups, Briggs (1974) recognized the
inner sea of the Baja California Peninsula as a biogeographic province different from the San Diegan and
Mexican Provinces, naming it the Cortez Province (CP).
The latter author determined the southern limits to be at
La Paz Bay on the west coast of the Gulf of California, and
Topolobampo Bay on the east coast. This province together with the San Diegan Province constitutes the warm-temperate Californian region. Currently, the northern limit of
the CP is known to be located at Baha Magdalena, Baja
California Sur, and the southern boundary in the
Topolobampo region, Sinaloa (Fig. 1) (Hastings 2000,
Robertson and Cramer 2009). This province is delimited
to the north by strong temperature gradients (Robertson et
al. 2004, Mora and Robertson 2005) and to the south by
the Sinaloa gap, a coastline of 370 km, which includes
wide extensions of sandy and muddy bottoms, with estuarine lagoons and wide mangrove areas that separate it from
the Mexican Province (Springer 1959, Dawson 1975,
Hastings 2000). This gap has been considered a faunistic
filter given that it does not have the same isolation effects
for all fish elements (Castro-Aguirre et al. 1995).
Walker (1960) made the first evaluation of the endemic
fishes of the Gulf of California reporting 92 species. In subsequent studies, Findley et al. (1996a, b, 1997, 1999) initially recognized the existence of 77, and ended up with 86,
endemic species. Castro-Aguirre et al. (2005a) evaluated
fish species from the Gulf of California with amphipacific,
boreal, endemic, and amphipeninsular distributions and
reported 50 endemic species. Nevertheless, despite these
studies mention endemic species of the GC, none of them
present a complete systematic list. Our study presents an
amendment of the fish component from the CP, including
the most relevant ecological attributes of species, plus an
updated taxonomic list.

demersal (MBD); pelagic-demersal (PD), species that

being demersal also break-into the water column; neriticpelagic (NP), those species associated to the upper part of
the water column by the coastal zone; mesopelagic (MP);
and bathybenthic (BB). Classification in bathymetric distribution was made using minimum and maximum depth
limits in which species are distributed.
Reproductive strategies for each species were grouped
according to Balon (1989) and Elliot and Dewailly (1995),
as following: viviparous (V), those species who give birth to
complete juveniles and whose embryos obtain nutrients
from yolk or directly from their mother; ovoviviparous (W),
those with internal fertilization, embryonic development is
produced inside the ovary until larvae are formed, and
nutrition of embryo does not depend on the mother but on
egg yolk; and oviparous, in those fishes, eggs are spawned
directly to the environment and fertilization is external
although in some uncommon instances internal fertilization events may occur before spawning. Within the
oviparous group, a sub-classification was considered:
oviparous with pelagic eggs (OP), oviparous with benthic
eggs and pelagic phase (OBPP), oviparous with benthic
eggs without pelagic phase (OBWPP), oviparous with oral
gestation (OOG), and oviparous with gestation in the vascularized ventral sac (OGVVS).
Regarding size, species were classified by 10 cm
length intervals. Biological information was obtained from
specific published sources (e.g., Thomson et al. 2000,
Robertson and Allen 2008).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was made, considering current biological knowledge and taxonomic status
of the endemic species from the Cortez Province (CP)
(sensu Hastings 2000). Those fish species with restricted
distribution ranges, falling within the limits of this
province, were considered endemic. An updated systematic list is presented excluding species being a subject of
any stage of taxonomic review. Family designations and
higher hierarchical ranks follow Nelson (2006). Genera
and their respective species are presented alphabetically.
The spelling of scientific and common names is based on
FishBase (Froese and Pauly 2012).
Additionally, and to recognize the dominant ecological attributes of CP endemic species, the preferential habitat, bathymetric distribution, reproduction strategy, and
the maximum total length (TL) were recorded. According
to their habitat, species were classified as follows: reef Fig. 1. Study area, the biogeographic province of Cortez
(PC) (shaded grey) (sensu Hastings 2000)
species (R); soft bottom demersal (SBD); mixed bottom

Endemic fishes of the Cortez Province (Eastern Pacific Ocean)

RESULTS
Seventy-nine endemic species were recognized and
grouped into 29 families, and 59 genera (Table 1). A total
of 75 species belong to the class Actinopterygii (94.9%),
three to the class Chondrichthyes (3.8%), and one to the
class Myxini (1.3%). Gobiidae, Chaenopsidae, and
Labrisomidae were the best represented families in terms
of number of species with 12, 8, and 7, respectively. On
the other hand, Sebastes and Ogilbia (with six and four
species, respectively) were the genera with the highest
richness. From the overall taxonomic composition, five
genera appeared to be endemic to the CP (Colpichthys,
Totoaba, Crocodilichthys, Xenomedea, and Aruma).
Fishes associated to coralline- and rocky reef systems
were the dominant group with 36 species (45.6%).
Nineteen (24.05%) species were grouped in the soft bottom demersal group; the demersal-pelagic and demersalneritic groups were represented by eight species each
(Fig. 2). Twenty-seven species (35.5%) can be found
within the first 10-m depth layer of water (Fig. 3). Six
species reach depths > 200 m, of which, only two exceed
1000 m. The dominant reproduction strategies were
oviparous with benthic eggs and pelagic phase (38
species, 48.7%), and oviparous species with pelagic eggs
(20 species, 25.6%) (Fig. 4). Regarding adult length, more
than half of the endemic species (39 species, 52%) are
between 1 and 10 cm total length (TL) and only six
exceed 50 cm of TL (Fig. 5).
DISCUSSION
The 79 endemic species considered in this study constitute 8.67% of the total fish fauna reported for the Gulf
of California (911 species; Hastings et al. 2010) and
6.14% of the total shore species of the Tropical Eastern
Pacific (1285 species) (Robertson and Allen 2008). The
number of reported endemic fish species has not drastically changed within the past 50 years, from the 92 species
documented by Walker (1960), or the 7786 found by
Findley et al. (1996a,b, 1997, 1999). However, the taxonomic list of species that take part of this endemic assemblage has indeed been modified. Since 1960, a total of 31
endemic new species have been described as species new
to science in the CP. Ten of these new species were
described after Findley et al. (1996a, b, 1997 and 1999):
Elacatinus limbaughi* (Gobiidae); Stellifer wintersteenorum (Sciaenidae); Opistognathus fossoris and
O. walkeri (Opistognathidae); Mustelus albipinnis
(Triakidae); Ogilbia davidsmithi, O. nigromarginata,
O. nudiceps (Bythitidae); Etropus ciadi (Paralichthyidae);
and Acanthemblemaria hastingsi (Chaenopsidae).
The greatest percentage of endemic species corresponded to the families Gobiidae (13 species),
Chaenopsidae (8 species), Labrisomidae (7 species),
Scorpaenidae (6 species), Gobiesocidae (5 species),
Sciaenidae (5 species), Bythitidae (4 species), and
Dactyloscopidae (3 species). Highly diversified families
in the Tropical Eastern Pacific such as Serranidae (56
species), Ophichthidae (41 species), Haemulidae (37

155

species), Labridae (36 species), Carangidae (35 species),

and Muraenidae (33 species), do not have endemic representatives in the CP and/or are poorly represented. The
same pattern can be identified at a genus level; e.g.,
anchovies (Anchoa: 19 species), tonguefishes
(Symphurus: 18 species), wrasses and moray eels
(Halichoeres and Gymnothorax, respectively; both with
12 autochthonous species), among others.
Walker (1960) recognized four endemic genera from
the CP, while Findley et al. (1997) only found two
(Totoaba and Xenomedea). According to the presently
reported study, five genera, four of them currently monotypic, are endemic to the CP (Colpichthys, Totoaba,
Crocodilichthys, Xenomedea, and Aruma).
From the endemic species, three belong to the family
Atherinopsidae: the false grunion, Colpichthys regis,
a common species in the Sonora coastal hypersaline (values > pss 50) lagoons; and Colpichthys hubbsi and
Leuresthes sardine, both autochthonous to the northern
part of the Gulf of California, and restricted to the delta
and mouth of the Colorado River, Sonora (Castro-Aguirre
and Espinosa-Prez 2006). The Panamic flashlightfish,
Phthanophaneron harveyi, is the only species of the family Anomalopidae present in the Tropical Eastern Pacific
and it is endemic to the CP (Thomson et al. 2000).
Some species of this endemic component support or
even keep supporting important fishery pressure.
The Gulf weakfish, Cynoscion othonopterus, forms reproductive aggregations from February to May; a period during
which it is captured in great numbers. In 2009, the Gulf
weakfish capture reached a profit of more than 30 million
Mexican pesos (Paredes et al. 2010). The Gulf croaker,
Micropogonias megalops, represents almost 27% of the
total fish capture in the Upper Gulf of California (AragnNoriega et al. 2009). The totoaba, Totoaba macdonaldi,
supported one of the most important fisheries in the
region; nevertheless, uncontrolled fisheries and the
decrease of Colorado River flow and thus spawning,
breeding, and reproduction of this species brought this
fishery to collapse (Cisneros-Mata et al. 1995). Currently,
the totoaba is included in NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010
regulation in the category of risk of extinct, and as
Critically Endangered by the IUCN red list of threatened
Species. According to Berdegue (1955), during the 1950s,
totoaba fisheries at San Felipe were composed of 25
shrimp fishing ships, each capturing an average of five to
six tons of totoaba weekly.
Many other endemic species are part of multi-specific
fisheries (e.g., Diplectrum sciurus, Paralichthys aestuarius, Stellifer wintersteenorum, and Umbrina wintersteeni). In addition, some small reef species, at least four
(Malacoctenus hubbsi, Emblemaria hypacanthus,
E. walkeri, and Gobiosoma chiquita), are exploited for the
aquarium trade (Pia-Espallargas, unpublished**).
The number of endemic species presented in this study
may vary given that there are non-validated records, such as
the spiny guitarfish, Rhinobatos spinosus, that was described
from a 26 cm total length specimen, and considered

Full species names featuring the authority and the year are privided in Tables 1 and 2.
Pia-Espallargas R. 2005. La pesquera de especies marinas con fines de ornato en Mxico. El parque marino de Loreto, B.C.S., como estudio de caso. MSc Thesis.
Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto Politcnico Nacional (CICIMAR-IPN). La Paz, Mxico.
*

**

156

Palacios-Salgado et al.
Table 1

Taxonomic list of the endemic fishes from Cortez Province (Eastern Pacific Ocean)
Class, family, and species

Common name

Habitat

Depth
[m]

TL
[cm]

RS

CLASS MYXINI
FAMILY MYXINIDAE
Eptatretus sinus Wisner et McMillan, 1990

Cortez hagfish

708

48

OBWPP

Peppered catshark

4001330

30

OBWPP

103281

118

Spiny guitarfish

26

Ordinary eel

B
B

30
3

24
51

OP
OP

White-ring
garden eel

20

80

OP

Longfin Pacific
anchovy
Hellers anchovy
Mystery anchovy

10

14

OP

E
E

10

10

OP
OP

Rainbow cusk-eel

85

26

OP

11

33

30

8.5

10

185

21.5

OBWPP

E
E
E

4
4
5

15
20
25

OBPP
OBPP
OBPP

100

26

OP

33

21

OGVVS

CLASS CHONDRICHTHYES
FAMILY SCYLIORHINIDAE
Galeus piperatus Springer et Wagner, 1966
FAMILY TRIAKIDAE
Mustelus albipinnis Castro-Aguirre, Antuna-Mendiola,
Gonzlez-Acosta et De la Cruz-Agero, 2005
FAMILY RHINOBATIDAE
Rhinobatos spinosus Gnther, 1870
CLASS ACTINOPTERYGII
FAMILY OPHICHTHIDAE
Apterichtus gymnocelus (Bhlke, 1953)
Ethadophis byrnei Rosenblatt et McCosker, 1970
FAMILY CONGRIDAE
Heteroconger canabus (Cowan et Rosenblatt, 1974)
FAMILY ENGRAULIDAE
Anchoa analis (Miller, 1945)
Anchoa helleri (Hubbs, 1921)
Anchoviella parri (Hildebrand, 1943)
FAMILY OPHIDIIDAE
Ophidion iris Breder, 1936
FAMILY BYTHITIDAE

Smiths
coralbrotula
Ogilbia nigromarginata Mller, Schwarzhans et Nielsen, 2005 Darkfinned
coralbrotula
Naked-headed
Ogilbia nudiceps Mller, Schwarzhans et Nielsen, 2005
coralbrotula
Ogilbia ventralis (Gill, 1863)
Gulf cuskeel
FAMILY BATRACHOIDIDAE
Mimetic
Porichthys mimeticus Walker et Rosenblatt, 1988
midshipman
FAMILY ATHERINOPSIDAE
Colpichthys hubbsi Crabtree, 1989
Delta silverside
Colpichthys regis (Jenkins et Evermann, 1889)
False grunion
Leuresthes sardina (Jenkins et Evermann, 1889)
Gulf grunion
FAMILY ANOMALOPIDAE
Phthanophaneron harveyi (Rosenblatt et Montgomery, 1976) Gulf flashlightfish
FAMILY SYNGNATHIDAE
Syngnathus carinatus (Gilbert, 1892)
Cortez pipefish
FAMILY SEBASTIDAE
Sebastes cortezi (Beebe et Tee-Van, 1938)
Cortez rockfish
Sebastes exsul Chen, 1971
Buccaneer rockfish
Sebastes peduncularis Chen, 1975
Gulf rockfish
Ogilbia davidsmithi Mller, Schwarzhans et Nielsen, 2005

F
D
F

1100
25.5
200
31
440450 4.7 AJ

W
W
W

157

Endemic fishes of the Cortez Province (Eastern Pacific Ocean)

Table 1 (cont.)
Habitat

Depth
[m]

TL
[cm]

RS

670

15.2

D
F

200
500

34.4
5.6 AJ

W
W

Cortez searobin

60

OP

Gulf squirrelfish

100

17

OP

Barred jawfish

C
C

32
90

11
13.5

OOG
OOG

Gulf weakfish
Gulf croaker
Totoaba
Amigo stardrum
Wintersteen drum

D
D
D
D
D

30
30
25
20
15

70
40
200
21
35

OP
OP
OP
OP
OP

Gulf opal eye

15

46

OP

Cape wrasse

57

OP

Cortez triplefin
Lizard triplefin

A
A

5
40

5
8

OBPP
OBPP

Whitesaddle
stargazer
Ornate stargazer
Dart stargazer

45

OBPP

B
B

55
20

6
9

OBPP
OBPP

Hidden blenny
Sonora blenny
Redside blenny
Topgallant blenny
Magdalena blenny
Fugitive blenny
Redrump blenny

A
A
A
A
A
A
A

10
5
6
40
21
60
33

3.5
13
9
6
4.5
4
6.5

OBPP
OBPP
OBPP
OBPP
W
W

Browncheek blenny
Cortez barnacle
blenny
Cortez pikeblenny
Scarletfin blenny
Spikefin blenny
Gulf signal blenny
Elusive signal
blenny
California worm
blenny

60

OBPP

10

5.5

OBPP

A
A
A
A

40
5
9
10

7.2
4
3.5
5

OBPP
OBPP
OBPP
OBPP

20

6.5

OBPP

6.5

OBPP

Class, family, and species

Common name

Sebastes sinensis (Gilbert, 1890)

Blackmouth
rockfish
Spinyeye rockfish
Hidden rockfish

Sebastes spinorbis Chen, 1975

Sebastes varispinis Chen, 1975
FAMILY PERISTEDIIDAE
Peristedion paucibarbiger Castro-Aguirre
et Garca-Domnguez, 1984
FAMILY SERRANIDAE
Diplectrum sciurus Gilbert, 1892
FAMILY OPISTOGNATHIDAE
Opistognathus fossoris Bussing et Lavenberg, 2003
Opistognathus walkeri Bussing et Lavenberg, 2003
FAMILY SCIAENIDAE
Cynoscion othonopterus Jordan et Gilbert, 1882
Micropogonias megalops (Gilbert, 1890)
Totoaba macdonaldi (Gilbert, 1890)
Stellifer wintersteenorum Chao, 2001
Umbrina wintersteeni Walker et Radford, 1992
FAMILY KYPHOSIDAE
Girella simplicidens Osburn et Nichols, 1916
FAMILY LABRIDAE
Pseudojuloides inornatus (Gilbert, 1890)
FAMILY TRIPTERYGIIDAE
Axoclinus nigricaudus Allen et Robertson, 1991
Crocodilichthys gracilis Allen et Robertson, 1991
FAMILY DACTYLOSCOPIDAE
Dactyloscopus pectoralis Gill, 1861
Gillellus ornatus Gilbert, 1892
Myxodagnus opercularis Gill, 1861
FAMILY LABRISOMIDAE
Cryptotrema seftoni Hubbs, 1954
Malacoctenus gigas Springer, 1959
Malacoctenus hubbsi Springer, 1959
Paraclinus altivelis (Lockington, 1881)
Paraclinus magdalenae Rosenblatt et Parr, 1969
Starksia cremnobates (Gilbert, 1890)
Xenomedea rhodopyga Rosenblatt et Taylor, 1971
FAMILY CHAENOPSIDAE
Acanthemblemaria crockeri Beebe et Tee-Van, 1938
Acanthemblemaria hastingsi Lin et Galland, 2010
Chaenopsis coheni Bhlke, 1957
Coralliozetus micropes (Beebe et Tee-Van, 1938)
Coralliozetus rosenblatti Stephens, 1963
Emblemaria hypacanthus (Jenkins et Evermann, 1889)
Emblemaria walkeri Stephens, 1963
Stathmonotus sinuscalifornici (Chabanaud, 1942)
F

158

Palacios-Salgado et al.

Table 1 (cont.)
Class, family, and species
FAMILY GOBIESOCIDAE
Gobiesox pinniger Gilbert, 1890
Gobiesox schultzi Briggs, 1951
Pherallodiscus funebris (Gilbert, 1890)
Tomicodon boehlkei Briggs, 1955
Tomicodon humeralis (Gilbert, 1890)
FAMILY GOBIIDAE
Aruma histrio (Jordan, 1884)
Barbulifer pantherinus (Pellegrin, 1901)
Chriolepis minutillus Gilbert, 1892
Chriolepis zebra Ginsburg, 1938
Elacatinus limbaughi Hoese et Reader, 2001
Evermannia longipinnis (Steindachner, 1879)
Gillichthys detrusus Gilbert et Scofield, 1898
Gillichthys seta (Ginsburg, 1938)
Gobiosoma chiquita (Jenkins et Evermann, 1889)
Ilypnus luculentus (Ginsburg, 1938)
Pycnomma semisquamatum Rutter, 1904
Quietula guaymasiae Jenkins et Evermann, 1889
FAMILY STROMATEIDAE
Peprilus ovatus Horn, 1970
FAMILY PARALICHTHYIDAE
Etropus ciadi van der Heiden et Plascencia Gonzlez, 2005
Paralichthys aestuarius Gilbert et Scofield, 1898
FAMILY PLEURONECTIDAE
Pleuronichthys ocellatus Starks et Thompson, 1910

Common name
Tadpole clingfish
Smoothlip clingfish
Northern fraildisc
clingfish
Cortez clingfish
Sonora clingfish

Habitat

Depth
[m]

TL
[cm]

RS

A
A

5
5

13
7.8

OBPP
OBPP

12.5

OBPP

A
A

12
5

7.5
10

OBPP
OBPP

A
A
A
A

15
32
45
30

6.5
5.2
3.2
4.4

OBPP
OBPP
OBPP
OBPP

30

3.4

OBPP

B
B

3
10

3.8
11.1

OBPP
OBPP

Slow goby
Panther goby
Rubble goby
Gecko goby
Widebanded
cleaning goby
Enigmatic goby
Delta mudsucker
Shortjaw
mudsucker
Sonora goby
Bright goby
Secret goby
Guaymas goby

OBPP

A
B
A
B

10
3
20
5

7.5
5.3
6.3
8.5

OBPP
OBPP
OBPP
OBPP

Shining butterfish

27

13

OP

Cortez flounder

B
B

40
45

11.5
58

OP
OP

Ocellated turbot

140

24

OP

Common names follow those in FishBase (Froese and Pauly 2012); Habitat: A = reef species, B = soft bottom demersal,
C = mixed bottom demersal, D = pelagicdemersal (species that being demersal also break-into the water column), E = neriticpelagic (those associated to the upper part of the water column by the coastal zone), F = mesopelagic, G = bathybenthic; Depth (minimum and maximum depth limits in which species are distributed); TL = maximum total length, (AJ = all
juveniles); RS = reproduction strategy (V = viviparous, W = ovoviviparous, OP = oviparous with pelagic eggs, OBPP =
oviparous with benthic eggs and pelagic phase, OBWPP = oviparous with benthic eggs without pelagic phase, OOG =
oviparous with oral gestation, OGVVS = oviparous with gestation in the vascularized ventral sac).

as a possible juvenile of a different species by Compagno

(2005). However, Castro-Aguirre and Espinosa-Prez
(1996) collected and confirmed the existence of this
species off the La Paz Bay. A similar situation is that of the
mystery anchovy, Anchoviella parri, described from specimens collected in 1926 on board of the Pawnee research
cruise off San Felipe. Based on morphological characters
Whitehead et al. (1988) proposed that Anchoviella parri
might instead be the Upper Gulf of California Anchoa lucida. Similarly, the Gulf rockfish, Sebastes peduncularis, is
only known from two juvenile specimens collected with
midwater trawls between the southern end of Tiburon
Island and Angel de la Guarda Island, at 440450 m depths

(Chen 1975). However, given the overlapping characters

with the Cortez rockfish, S. cortezi, Chen (1975) himself
discussed the option of this species being a junior synonym of the Cortez rockfish or even of any other species
of Sebastes (see Chen 1975, Love et al. 2002).
Additionally, three species were described and are currently known only from their holotypes. The ordinary eel,
Ethadophis byrnei, was sampled during low tide at
Puertecitos, western coast of the Gulf of California.
The Cortez searobin, Peristedion paucibarbiger, was collected by bottom trawling at 60 m depth north of La Paz bay, BCS.
Lastly, the cape wrasse, Pseudojuloides inornatus, is known
only from a juvenile collected near Cabo San Lucas, BCS.

Endemic fishes of the Cortez Province (Eastern Pacific Ocean)

159

A smoothhound shark, Mustelus albipinnis, was

described from six captured specimens in 2000, at Puerto
Adolfo Lopez Mateos, BCS. The same species was also
described, in the same year, under the name M. hacat,
from 36 collected specimens across the Gulf of California;
nevertheless, M. albipinnis is considered as the valid name
according to priority principle (Anonymous 1999).
Considering both descriptions, the distribution range of this
species comprises the inner parts of the Gulf of California:
from north of Isla Angel de la Guarda, to the south-western
coast of the Gulf of California including Santa Cruz and
Monserrat Islands, and La Ventana Bay, and the Western
coast of BCS on the shelf in front of Baha Magdalena Fig. 4. Reproductive strategies of endemic fishes from the
(Castro-Aguirre et al. 2005b, Perez-Jimenez et al. 2005).
Cortez Province: OBPP = oviparous with benthic eggs
This species can be kept as an endemic component of CP;
and pelagic phase, OBWPP = oviparous with benthic
however, according to Perez-Jimenez et al. (2005), it is
eggs without pelagic phase, OGVVS = oviparous with
possible that M. albipinnis distribution extends southward
gestation in the vascularized ventral sac, OOG =
to the coasts of Ecuador including Galapagos Islands.
oviparous with oral gestation, OP = oviparous with
Bussing and Lavenberg (2003), in a review of the
pelagic eggs, V = viviparous, W = ovoviviparous
genus Opistognathus, concluded that Opistognathus mexicanus Allen et Robertson, 1991, considered endemic to
the Gulf of California, was instead a juvenile of O. punctatus Peters, 1869, which has a wide distribution across
the Tropical Eastern Pacific. An opposite case is that of
delta mudsucker, Gillichthys detrusus (Gobiidae), this

Fig. 5. Endemic fishes from the Cortez Province; Length-class

distribution (maximum total length; Length classes [cm]

Fig. 2. Endemic fishes from the Cortez Province by preferential habitat; R = reef, SBD = soft bottom demersal,
MBD = mixed bottom demersal, PD = pelagicdemersal, NP = neriticpelagic, MP = mesopelagic,
BB = bathybenthic

Fig. 3. Bathymetric distribution of endemic fishes from

the Cortez Province

species was erroneously placed in the synonymy of

G. mirabilis Cooper, 1864, in 1907 (see Swift et al. 2011).
A study on several species complexes done by
Hastings and Springer (2009), resulted in recognition of
existing morphological differences among subspecies of
Dactyloscopus pectoralis (fallax, insulatus, and pectoralis) and Malacoctenus hubbsi (hubbsi and polyporosus) evidence used to guarantee at least the existence
of D. pectoralis and M. hubbsi as endemic species to the
CP. Similar studies were made by Rosenblatt and Parr
(1967, 1969) for the genus Paraclinus; Stepien and
Rosenblatt (1991) for Gibbonsia and Heterostichus; and
Bath (2008) for the genus Parablennius, where some subspecies were raised to species and some others were recognized as synonyms (Hastings and Springer 2009).
Nonetheless, the use of additional tools is required (e.g.,
geometric morphometrics and genetic or molecular analyses) to come to any further conclusions on these particular cases.
Additionally, 21 species described as endemics of the
Gulf of California have been found outside the CP
expanding their distribution ranges (e.g., Castro-Aguirre
et al. 2006). Those species are: Raja cortezensis

160

Palacios-Salgado et al.
Table 2

Genetic divergence in disjunct fish species

Species

Molecular marker

Anisotremus davidsonii (Steindachner, 1876)

Cytochrome B
Cytochrome B
S7
Chaenopsis alepidota (Gilbert, 1890)
Control region
Gillichthys mirabilis Cooper, 1864
Cytochrome B
Girella nigricans (Ayres, 1860)
Control region
Control region
Gymnura marmorata Cooper, 1864
NADH2
Halichoeres semicinctus (Ayres, 1859)
Control region
Hermosilla azurea Jenkins et Evermann, 1889
Control region
Hypsoblennius jenkinsi (Jordan et Evermann, 1896) Control region
Hypsopsetta guttulata (Girard, 1856)
Control region
S7
Lythrypnus dalli (Gilbert, 1890)
Cytochrome B
Myliobatis californica Gill, 1865
NADH2
Narcine entemedor Jordan et Starks, 1895
NADH2
Paralabrax maculatofasciatus (Steindachner, 1868) Control region
Rhinobatos productus Ayres, 1854
Control region
NADH2

Divergence
[%]
0.40
1.34
0
1.87
2.21
8.49
3.3
<0.01
0.79
2.30
7.87
0.1211
0.0029
0.20
0.3
0
1.06
2.47
1.2

Rhinoptera steindachneri Evermann et Jenkins, 1891 NADH2

10

Sebastes macdonaldi (Eigenmann et Beeson, 1893) Control region

Semicossyphus pulcher (Ayres, 1854)
Control region

0.64
0.84

Reference
Bernardi and Lape 2005
Bernardi et al. 2003
Bernardi and Lape 2005
Bernardi et al. 2003
Huang and Bernardi 2001
Bernardi et al. 2003
Terry et al. 2000
SCRO
Bernardi et al. 2003
Bernardi et al. 2003
Bernardi et al. 2003
Schinske et al. 2010
Schinske et al. 2010
Bernardi et al. 2003
SCRO
SCRO
Stepien et al. 2001
SCRO
SCRO
Sandoval-Castillo and
Rocha-Olivares 2011
Bernardi et al. 2003
Bernardi et al. 2003

SCRO = Sandoval-Castillo and Rocha-Olivares, unpublished data in: Sandoval-Castillo and Rocha-Olivares (2011).

McEachran et Miyake, 1988 (Rajidae), Urobatis concentricus Osburn et Nichols, 1916 (Urotrygonidae),
Urolophus maculatus (Garman, 1913) (Urolophidae),
Gymnothorax eurygnathos Bhlke, 2001 (Muraenidae),
Herpetoichthys fossatus (Myers et Wade, 1941)
(Ophichthidae), Heteroconger digueti (Pellegrin, 1923)
(Congridae), Anchoa mundeoloides (Breder, 1928)
(Engraulidae), Porichthys analis Hubbs et Schultz, 1939
(Batrachoididae), Scorpaena sonorae Jenkins et Evermann,
1889 (Scorpaenidae), Mycteroperca prionura Rosenblatt et
Zahuranec, 1967, M. rosacea (Streets, 1877) (Serranidae),
Opistognathus rosenblatti Allen et Robertson, 1991
(Opistognathidae), Orthopristis reddingi Jordan et
Richardson, 1895 (Haemulidae), Chromis limbaughi
Greenfield et Woods, 1980, Stegastes rectifraenum
(Gill, 1862) (Pomacentridae), Enneanectes reticulatus Allen et
Robertson, 1991 (Tripterygiidae), Labrisomus xanti Gill, 1860
(Labrisomidae), Cirriemblemaria lucasana (Stephens, 1963)
(Chaenopsidae), Bollmannia macropoma Gilbert, 1892,
B. ocellata Gilbert, 1892 (Gobiidae), and Citharichthys
gordae Beebe et Tee-Van, 1938 (Paralichthyidae). The
record of Paralichthys aestuarius from Laguna Ojo de
Liebre (Arellano-Martinez et al. 1997) is erroneous; this
specimen was examined and allowed us to confidently
identify it as P. californicus (Ayres, 1859).
On the other hand, ecological characteristics of the CP
endemic species revealed that the component associated
with coralline and rocky reef systems is dominant, mainly represented by small fishes from the families Gobiidae,

Chaenopsidae, Labrisomidae, Gobiesocidae, and

Bythitidae, among others. These groups are common off
the islands of the Gulf of California, and in the central and
south-western coasts of it (Thomson et al. 2000, Thomson
and Gilligan 2002). Demersal, demersal-pelagic, and neritic-pelagic species from the families Paralichthyidae,
Sciaenidae, Engraulidae, and Atherinopsidae are related
mainly to soft bottom ecosystems in the eastern coast and
Upper Gulf of California (Hastings and Findley 2007,
Robertson and Allen 2008). Concerning deep-water
ichthyofauna from the Gulf of California, Castro-Aguirre
and Balart (1996) denoted the importance of further studies on the great basins, trenches, and ocean depressions
from where specimens like the Cortez hagfish, Eptatretus
sinus, were obtained. Robertson and Cramer (2009) without counting this deep-water component validated the
existence of only 62 fish species endemic to the PC.
From the endemic ichthyofauna, 12 species reach
a maximum length of 5 cm, 39 are shorter than 10 cm, and
only the totoaba reaches a total length exceeding 2 m.
Small-sized species belong mainly to the families
Gobiidae, Chaenopsidae, Labrisomidae, Gobiesocidae,
Dactyloscopidae, and Tripterygiidae. The dominant reproduction strategy of these families is oviparous with benthic eggs and pelagic phase. These families are considered
primary residents given the limited movility of larvae and
adults (Thomson and Gilligan 2002). Eggs are relatively
large and fixed to the substratum, while adults have a short
lifetime (one or two years of generation time), becoming

Endemic fishes of the Cortez Province (Eastern Pacific Ocean)

territorial and therefore limiting genetic flow and favouring species fragmentation (Rosenblatt 1963, Thomson and
Gilligan 2002). TEP biogeographic gaps (e.g., Sinaloa and
Central America) have a considerable impact on these
families. Conversely oviparous species with pelagic eggs
and long planktonic larval stage (secondary residents)
have great potential for dispersal, which is enhanced by the
currents (Leis and McCormick 2002), keeping species
genetic homogeneity. In the TEP just 30% of species are
oviparous with benthic eggs and pelagic phase, most of
the species are oviparous with pelagic eggs (56%)
(Robertson and Allen 2008).
Some models have demonstrated that ecological differences may cause partial or total reproductive barriers in
just hundreds of generations (Hendry et al. 2007).
Reproductive isolation may evolve rapidly when populations are settled and adapted to ecologically different environments (Palumbi 1994). In the presently reported study,
26 species with disjunct population distribution have been
detected; these species are found on the Pacific Coast and
in the northern part of the Gulf of California, but are absent
from the southern (Cabo San Lucas) region (Walker 1960,
Castro-Aguirre et al. 2005a, Hastings et al. 2010). These
species are: Hydrolagus colliei (Lay et Bennett, 1839)
(Chimaeridae), Raja binoculata Girard, 1855, R. inornata
Jordan et Gilbert, 1881, R. rhina Jordan et Gilbert, 1880
(Rajidae), Platyrhinoidis triseriata (Jordan et Gilbert, 1880)
(Platyrhinidae), Atherinops affinis (Ayres, 1860)
(Atherinopsidae), Scorpaena guttata Girard, 1854
(Scorpaenidae), Sebastes macdonaldi (Sebastidae),
Zaniolepis frenata Eigenmann et Eigenmann, 1889
(Hexagrammidae), Anisotremus davidsonii (Haemulidae),
Atractoscion nobilis (Ayres, 1860), Cheilotrema saturnum
(Girard, 1858) (Sciaenidae), Girella nigricans
(Kyphosidae), Zalembius rosaceus (Jordan et Gilbert, 1880)
(Embiotocidae), Halichoeres semicinctus, Semicossyphus
pulcher (Labridae), Hypsoblennius gentilis (Girard, 1854),
H. jenkinsi (Blenniidae), Exerpes asper (Jenkins et
Evermann, 1889) (Labrisomidae), Chaenopsis alepidota
(Chaenopsidae), Gillichthys mirabilis (Gobiidae),
Scomberomorus
concolor
(Lockington,
1879)
(Scombridae), Paralichthys californicus (Paralichthyidae),
Pleuronichthys guttulatus (Girard, 1856), P. ocellatus
Starks et Thompson, 1910, and P. verticalis Jordan et
Gilbert, 1880 (Pleuronectidae).
Some studies (e.g., Bernardi et al. 2003, SandovalCastillo and Rocha-Olivares 2011) have detected subtle
morphological differences and, in some species, significant genetic distance (Table 2), which in turn could be
derived in increasing ichthyodiversity endemism in this
province. In addition, according to Robertson and Allen
(2008), three species (Chriolepis (2) and Enneanectes (1))
have not yet been described in the Gulf of California.
There is a general consensus that the limits of biogeographic provinces are identified by the occurrence of
species distribution and that these limits generally correspond
with the existence of environmental discontinuities. Established
limits for the CP have been extensively discussed (e.g.,

161

Hendrickx 1992, Hastings 2000, Erisman et al. 2011). Based on

geological evidence several authors (Thomson et al. 2000,
Brusca and Findley 2005, Brusca et al. 2005, Hendrickx et
al. 2005, 2007, and Hastings et al. 2010) have included in
the limits of the Gulf of California an extended fringe from
the Baja California Peninsula towards the Mexican mainland territory, in other words from Cabo San Lucas, BCS
towards Cabo Corriente, Jalisco. The southern CP limit
extension allows the inclusion of three endemic species
from Islas Maras: the scaly-belly blenny, Starksia lepidogaster Rosenblatt et Taylor, 1971, described from 11 specimens collected at Cleopatra Island; the leastfoot blenny,
Paraclinus ditrichus Rosenblatt et Parr, 1969, known only
from three specimens; and the lonely clingfish, Gobiesox
marijeanae Briggs, 1960, known from eleven specimens. The
latter two species were sampled at San Juanito Island. This
addendum would increase endemic species number to 82.
A great number of studies have pointed out the importance of the CP in terms of conservation, and although
recent meaningful efforts for its conservation have been
developed (e.g., World heritage Islands and protected areas
of the Gulf of California, Natural protected areas: Biosphere
reserves of the Upper Gulf of California and Colorado River
delta; San Pedro Martir Island; Bahia de los Angeles,
Ballenas and Salsipuedes Channels; Gulf of California
islands; and Cabo San Lucas; National parks of Loreto bay,
Cabo Pulmo, Espiritu Santo Archipelago, and San Lorenzo
Archipelago), over the past two decades the existence of
a complex web of threats to this large marine ecosystem have
being noted (Sala et al. 2004, Enrquez-Andrade et al. 2005,
Senz-Arroyo et al. 2005, Cudney-Bueno et al. 2009,
Hastings et al. 2010, Erisman et al. 2011).
It is generally known that nomenclature ambiguity, and
incomplete diversity lists may represent a problem for
species and therefore area conservation (Rojas 1992, Hey et
al. 2003, Isaac et al. 2004, Mace 2004). Hence, the importance of clarifying species taxonomic status and updating
the knowledge of endemism might help in the development
of objective conservation strategies (Kerr 1997).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was funded by the IIKKAKNAB, A.C. We
thank to Alfredo Zayas, Norma Snchez, Pablo Castro,
Luis Meja, Carlos Felix, and Linda Barranco for their
contribution to this study. D.S.P.S. wishes to thank
CONACyTs program: Complementary Support for the
Institutional Strengthening Working Groups: Retention.
Thanks to Melba De Jess Huerta and Mariana Santana
for their help in language editing.
REFERENCES

Anonymous 1999. International code of zoological nomenclature. Fourth edition. International Commission of Zoological
Nomenclature. The International Trust for Zoological
Nomenclature, c/o Natural History Museum, London.
Aragn-Noriega E.A., Valenzuela-Quiones W., EsparzaLeal H., Ortega-Rubio A., Rodrguez-Quiroz G. 2009.

162

Palacios-Salgado et al.

Analysis of management options for artisanal fishing of the

Bigeye Croaker Micropogonias megalops (Gilbert, 1890) in
the Upper Gulf of California. International Journal of
Biodiversity Science and Management 5 (4): 208214.
DOI: 10.1080/17451591003709371
Arellano-Martnez M., De La Cruz-Agero J., Cota-Gmez V.M.
1997. New records and range extensions of fishes on the Pacific
Coast of Mexico. Revista Biologa Tropical 45 (2): 936.
Balon E.K. 1989. Patterns in the evolution of reproductive styles
in fishes. Pp. 3551. In: Potts G.W., Wootton R.J. (eds.). Fish
reproduction strategies and tactics. Academic Press,
London.
Bath H. 2008. Review of the genus Parablennius Miranda-Ribeiro
from Australia and New Caledonia (Pisces: Blenniidae:
Salariinae). Stuttgarter Beitrge zur Naturkunde A, Neue Serie
1: 7794.
Berdegue J. 1955. La pesquera de la totoaba (Cynoscion macdonaldi Gilbert) en San Felipe, Baja California. Revista de
la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural 16 (14): 4578.
Bernardi G., Findley L.T., Rocha-Olivares A. 2003.
Vicariance and dispersal across Baja California in disjunct
marine fish populations. Evolution 57 (7): 15991609.
Bernardi G., Lape J. 2005. Tempo and mode of speciation in
the Baja California disjunct fish species Anisotremus davidsonii. Molecular Ecology 14 (13): 40854096.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02729.x
Briggs J.C. 1974. Marine zoogeography. McGraw-Hill, New
York, NY, USA.
Brusca R.C., Findley L.T. 2005. El Mar de Corts. Pp: 132.
In: Hendrickx M.E., Brusca C.R., Findley L.T. (eds.) Listado
y Distribucin de la Macrofauna del Golfo de California,
Mxico. Part I. Invertebrados. ArizonaSonora Desert
Museum/Conservation International, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Brusca R.C., Findley L.T., Hastings P.A., Hendrickx M.E.,
Torre Cosio J., van der Heiden A.M. 2005. Macrofaunal
biodiversity in the Gulf of California. Pp. 179203. In:
Cartron J.L.E., Ceballos G., Felger R. (eds.) Biodiversity,
ecosystems, and conservation in Northern Mexico. Oxford
University Press, New York, NY, USA.
Bussing W.A., Lavenberg R.J. 2003. Four new species of eastern
tropical
Pacific
jawfishes
(Opistognathus:
Opistognathidae). Revista Biologa Tropical 51 (2):
529550.
Castro-Aguirre J.L., Antuna-Mendiola A., Gonzlez-Acosta A.F.,
De la Cruz-Agero J. 2005a. Mustelus albipinnis sp. nov.
(Chondrichthyes: Carcharhiniformes: Triakidae) de la costa
suroccidental de Baja California Sur, Mxico.
Hidrobiolgica 15 (2): 123130.
Castro-Aguirre J.L., Balart E.F. 1996. Contribucin al
conocimiento del origen y las relaciones de la ictiofauna de
aguas profundas del Golfo de California, Mxico.
Hidrobiolgica 6 (12): 6776.
Castro-Aguirre J.L., Balart E.F., Arvizu-Martnez J. 1995.
Contribucin al conocimiento del origen y distribucin de la
ictiofauna del Golfo de California, Mexico. Hidrobiolgica
5 (12): 5778.
Castro-Aguirre J.L., Espinosa-Prez H. 1996. Listados
faunsticos de Mxico. VII. Catalogo sistemtico de las

rayas y especies afines de Mxico (Chondrichthyes:

Elasmobranchii: Rajiformes: Batoideiomorpha). Instituto de
Biologa, UNAM, Mexico.
Castro-Aguirre J.L., Espinosa-Prez H. 2006. Los peces de la
familia Atherinopsidae (Teleostei: Atheriniformes) de las
lagunas costeras neutras e hipersalinas de Mxico.
Hidrobiolgica 16 (1): 89101.
Castro-Aguirre J.L., Gonzalez-Acosta A.F., De la CruzAgero J. 2005b. Lista anotada de las especies cticas anfipacificas, de afinidad boreal, endmicas y anfipeninsulares del
Golfo de California, Mxico. Universidad y Ciencia 21 (42):
85106.
Castro-Aguirre J.L., Gonzlez-Acosta A.F., De la CruzAgero J., Moncayo-Estrada R. 2006. Ictiofauna marinacostera del Pacfico central mexicano: anlisis preliminar de
su riqueza y relaciones biogeogrficas. Pp: 149166.
In: Jimnez-Quiroz M.C., Espino-Barr E. (eds.) Los recursos pesqueros y acucolas de Jalisco, Colima y Michoacn.
Instituto Nacional de Pesca, SAGARPA, Mexico.
Chen L.C. 1975. The rockfishes, genus Sebastes (Scorpaenidae),
of the Gulf of California, including three new species with
a discussion of their origin. Proceedings of the California
Academia of Sciences Ser. 4, 40 (6): 109141.
Cisneros-Mata M.A., Montemayor-Lpez G., RomnRodrguez M.J. 1995. Life history and conservation of
Totoaba macdonaldi. Conservation Biology 9 (4): 806814.
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040806.x
Compagno L.J.V. 2005. Checklist of living Elasmobranchs. Pp.
503548. In: Hamlett W.C. (ed.) Reproductive biology and
phylogeny of Chondrichthyes: sharks, batoids, and chimaeras. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH, USA.
Cudney-Bueno R., Bourilln L., Senz-Arroyo A., TorreCoso J., Turk-Boyer P., Shaw W.W. 2009. Governance
and effects of marine reserves in the Gulf of California,
Mexico. Ocean and Coastal Management 52 (34): 207218.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.12.005
Dawson C.E. 1975. Studies on the eastern Pacific sand stargazers (Pisces: Dactyloscopidae) 2. Genus Dactyloscopus, with
descriptions of new species and subspecies. Natural History
Museum of Los Angeles County, Scientific Bulletin 22 (1): 161.
Elliott M., Dewailly F. 1995. The structure and components of
European estuarine fish assemblages. Netherlands Journal of
Aquatic Ecology 29 (34): 397417.
DOI: 10.1007/BF02084239
Enrquez-Andrade R., Anaya-Reyna G., Barrera-Guevara J.C.,
Carvajal-Moreno M.A., Martnez-Delgado M.E., VacaRodrguez J., Valds-Casillas C. 2005. An analysis of critical areas for biodiversity conservation in the Gulf of
California region. Ocean and Coastal Management 48 (1):
3150.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2004.11.002
Erisman B.E., Paredes G.A., Plomozo-Lugo T., Cota-Nieto J.J.,
Hastings P.A., Aburto-Oropeza O. 2011. Spatial structure
of commercial marine fisheries in Northwest Mexico. ICES
Journal of Marine Science 68 (3): 564571.
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsq179
Findley L.T., Hastings P.A., van der Heiden A.M., Gereca R.,
Torre J., Thomson D.A. 1997. Distribution of endemic

Endemic fishes of the Cortez Province (Eastern Pacific Ocean)

fishes of the Gulf of California, Mexico. Pp. 130.
In: Abstracts, 77th Annual Meeting of the American Society
of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, Seattle, WA, USA.
Findley L.T., Hastings P.A., van der Heiden A.M., Gereca R.,
Torre J., Thomson D.A. 1999. Distribution of endemic
ichthyofauna of the Sea of Cortes. Pp. 51. In: Abstracts, VII
Congreso de la Asociacin de Investigadores del Mar de
Corts, A.C. and Simposium Internacional sobre el Mar de
Corts. 2528, Mayo 1999. Universidad de Sonora.
Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.
Findley L.T., Torre J., Hastings P.A., van der Heiden A.M.,
Nava J.M. 1996a. Diversity and endemicity of the fish
fauna of the Gulf of California, Mexico. Pp. 1013. In:
Program and Abstracts. The phylogeny of life and the
accomplishments of phylogenetic biology. A symposium at
the University of Arizona Tucson, AZ, USA.
Findley L.T., Torre J., Nava J.M., van der Heiden A.M., Hastings
P.A. 1996b. Preliminary ichthyofaunal analysis from a macrofaunal database on the Gulf of California, Mxico. P. 138.
In: Abstracts, 76th Annual Meeting of the American Society
of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Froese R., Pauly D. (eds.) 2012. FishBase. [version 06/2012]
http://www.fishbase.org.
Hastings P.A. 2000. Biogeography of the Tropical Eastern
Pacific: distribution and phylogeny of chaenopsid fishes.
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 128 (3): 319335.
DOI: 10.1006/zjls.1998.0196
Hastings P.A., Findley L.T. 2007. Marine fishes of the
Biosphere Reserve, Northern Gulf of California. Pp.
364382. In: Felger R., Broyles W. (eds.) Dry borders:
Great natural areas of the Gran Desierto and Upper Gulf of
California. University Utah Press, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Hastings P.A., Findley L.T., Van der Heiden A.M. 2010.
Fishes of the Gulf of California. Pp: 96118. In: Brusca R.
(ed.). The Gulf of California. Biodiversity and Conservation.
University Arizona Press. Tucson, AZ, USA.
Hastings P.A., Springer V.G. 2009. Recognizing diversity in
blennioid fish nomenclature (Teleostei: Blennioidei).
Zootaxa 2009 (2120): 314.
Hendrickx M.E. 1992 Distribution and zoogeographic affinities of
decapods crustaceans of the Gulf of California, Mexico. Proceedings
of the San Diego Society of Natural History 20 (1): 111.
Hendrickx M.E., Brusca R.C., Cordero M., Ramrez R.G.
2007. Marine and brackish-water molluscan biodiversity in the
Gulf of California, Mexico. Scientia Marina 71 (4): 637647.
DOI: 10.3989/scimar.2007.71n4637
Hendrickx M.E., Brusca R.C., Findley L.T. (eds.) 2005.
A Distributional checklist of the macrofauna of the Gulf of
California, Mexico. Part I. Invertebrates. Arizona-Sonora
Desert Museum and Conservation International.
Hendry A.P., Nosil P., Rieseberg L.H. 2007. The speed of ecological speciation. Functional Ecology 21 (3): 455464.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01240.x
Hey J., Waples R.S., Arnold M.L., Butlin R.K., Harrison R.G.
2003. Understanding and confronting species uncertainty in
biology and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution
18 (11): 597603.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.08.014

163

Hildebrand S.F. 1943. A review of the American anchovies

(family Engraulidae). Bulletin of the Bingham
Oceanographic Collection Yale University 8: 1165.
Huang D., Bernardi G. 2001. Disjunct Sea of CortezPacific
Ocean Gillichthys mirabilis populations and the evolutionary origin of their Sea of Cortez endemic relative,
Gillichthys seta. Marine Biology 138 (2): 421428.
DOI: 10.1007/s002270000454
Isaac N.J.B., Mallet J., Mace G.M. 2004. Taxonomic inflation:
its influence on macroecology and conservation. Trends in
Ecology and Evolution 19 (9): 464469.
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2004.06.004
Kerr J.T. 1997. Species richness, endemism, and the choice of
areas for conservation. Conservation Biology 11 (5):
10941100.
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96089.x
Leis J.M., McCormick M.I. 2002. The biology, behavior, and
ecology of the pelagic, larval stage of coral reef fishes. Pp
171199. In: Sale P.F. (ed.) Coral reef fishes dynamics and
diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic Press, London.
Love M.S., Yoklavich M., Thorsteinson L. 2002. The rockfishes of the Northeast Pacific. University of California
Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Mace G.M. 2004. The role of taxonomy in species conservation.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London
B 359 (1444): 711719.
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1454
Mora C., Robertson D.R. 2005. Factors shaping the range-size
frequency distribution of the endemic fish fauna of the
Tropical Eastern Pacific. Journal of Biogeography 32 (2):
277286.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01155.x
Nelson J.S. 2006. Fishes of the world. 4th edn. John Wiley and
Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Palumbi S.R. 1994. Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and
marine speciation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics
25: 547572. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.es.25.110194.002555.
Paredes G.A., Erisman B., Mascareas-Osorio I., Cota-Nieto J.,
Gherard K., Aburto-Oropeza O. 2010. La curvina golfina:
Biologia, pesqueria y su gente. CONABIO. Biodiversitas
2010 (91): 15.
Prez Jimnez J.C., Sosa Nishizaki O., Castillo Geniz J.L.
2005. A new eastern north Pacific smoothhound shark
(genus Mustelus, family Triakidae) from the Gulf of
California. Copeia 2005 (4): 834845.
DOI: 10.1643/0045-8511(2005)005[0834:ANENPS]2.0.CO;2
Robertson D.R., Cramer K.L. 2009. Shore fishes and biogeographic subdivisions of the tropical eastern Pacific. Marine
Ecology Progress Series 380: 117.
DOI: 10.3354/meps07925
Robertson D.R., Allen G.R. 2008. Peces costeros del Pacfico
oriental tropical: Sistema de informacion en linea. Version
1.0 (2008). Instituto Smithsonian de Investigaciones
Tropicales,
Balboa,
Republica
de
Panama.
www.neotropicalfishes.org/sftep.
Robertson D.R., Grove J.S., McCosker J.E. 2004. Tropical
transpacific shore fishes. Pacific Science 58 (4): 507565.
DOI: 10.1353/psc.2004.0041

164

Palacios-Salgado et al.

Rojas M. 1992. The species problem and conservation: What

are we protecting? Conservation Biology 6 (2): 170178.
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.620170.x
Rosenblatt R.H. 1963. Some aspects of speciation in marine
shore fishes. Pp. 171180. In: Harding J.P., Tebble N.B.
(eds.) Speciation in the sea. Publications of the Systematics
Association, London, No. 5.
Rosenblatt R.H, Parr T.D. 1967. The identity of the blenny
Paraclinus altivelis (Lockington) and the status of P. sinus
Hubbs. Copeia 1967 (3): 675677.
Rosenblatt R.H., Parr T.D. 1969. The Pacific species of the
clinid fish genus Paraclinus. Copeia 1969 (1): 120.
Senz-Arroyo A., Roberts C.M., Torre J., Cario-Olvera M.,
Enrquez-Andrade R.R. 2005. Rapidly shifting environmental baselines among fishers of the Gulf of California.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 272 (1575):
19571962.
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3175
Sala E., Aburto-Oropeza O., Reza M., Paredes G., LpezLemuse L.G. 2004. Fishing down coastal food webs in the
Gulf of California. Fisheries 29 (3): 1925.
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446(2004)29[19:fdcfwi]2.0.co;2
Sandoval-Castillo J.R., Rocha-Olivares A. 2011. Deep mitochondrial divergence in Baja California populations of an
aquilopelagic elasmobranch: the golden cownose ray.
Journal of Heredity 102 (3): 269274.
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esr004
Schinske J.N., Bernardi G., Jacobs D.K., Routman E.J. 2010.
Phylogeography of the diamond turbot (Hypsopsetta guttulata)
across the Baja California Peninsula. Marine Biology 157 (1):
123134.
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-009-1302-2
Springer V.G. 1959. Systematics and zoogeography of the clinid
fishes of the subtribe Labrisomini Hubbs. Publications of the
Institute of Marine Science, University of Texas 5: 417492.
Stepien C., Rosenblatt R.H. 1991. Patterns of gene flow and
genetic divergence in the northeastern Pacific Clinidae
(Teleostei: Blennioidei), based on allozyme and morphological data. Copeia 1991 (4): 873896.
DOI: 10.2307/1446084

Stepien C.A., Rosenblatt R.H., Bargmeyer B.A. 2001.

Phylogeography of the spotted sand bass, Paralabrax maculatofasciatus: divergence of Gulf of California and Pacific
coast populations. Evolution 55 (9): 18521862.
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00834.x
Swift C.C., Findley L.T., Ellingson R.A., Flessa K.W., Jacobs D.K.
2011. The delta mudsucker, Gillichthys detrusus, a valid
species (Teleostei: Gobiidae) endemic to the Colorado River
delta, northernmost Gulf of California, Mxico. Copeia
2011 (1): 93102.
DOI: 10.1643/CI-09-123
Terry A., Bucciarelli G., Bernardi G. 2000. Restricted gene
flow and incipient speciation in disjunct Pacific Ocean and
Sea of Cortez populations of a reef fish species, Girella
nigricans. Evolution 54 (2): 652659.
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00066.x
Thomson D.A., Findley L.T., Kerstitch A.N. 2000. Reef Fishes
of the Sea of Cortez: The Rocky-Shore Fishes of the Gulf of
California. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, USA.
Thomson D.A., Gilligan M. 2002. Rocky-shore fishes.
Pp: 154180. In: Case T.J., Cody M.L., Ezcurra E. (eds.)
A new island biogeography in the Sea of Cortes. Oxford
University Press, Oxford.
Walker B.W. 1960. The distribution and affinities of the marine
fish fauna of the Gulf of California. Symposium: The
Biogeography of Baja California and adjacent Seas. System
Zoology 9 (3): 123133.
Whitehead P.J.P., Nelson G.J., Wongratana T. 1988. FAO
Species Catalogue. Clupeoid fishes of the world (Suborder
Clupeoidei). An annotated and illustrated catalogue of the
herrings, sardines, pilchards, sprats, shads, anchovies and
wolfherrings. Vol. 7. Part 2. Engraulididae. FAO Fish
Synopsis 125.

Received: 5 May 2012

Accepted: 22 June 2012
Published electronically: 30 September 2012