Introduction To Spread Spectrum
Introduction To Spread Spectrum
Over the last eight or nine years a new commercial marketplace has been
emerging. Called spread spectrum, this field covers the art of secure digital
communications that is now being exploited for commercial and industrial
purposes. In the next several years hardly anyone will escape being involved, in
some way, with spread spectrum communications. Applications for commercial
spread spectrum range from "wireless" LAN's (computer to computer local area
networks), to integrated bar code scanner/palmtop computer/radio modem devices
for warehousing, to digital dispatch, to digital cellular telephone communications,
to "information society" city/area/state or country wide networks for passing faxes,
computer data, email, or multimedia data.
The IEEE Spectrum of August, 1990 contained an article entitled Spread Spectrum
Goes Commercial, by Donald L. Schilling of City College of New York, Raymond
L. Pickholtz of George Washington University, and Laurence B. Milstein of UC
San Diego. This article summarized the coming of commercial spread spectrum:
"Spread-spectrum radio communications, long a favorite technology of the military
because it resists jamming and is hard for an enemy to intercept, is now on the
verge of potentially explosive commercial development. The reason: spreadspectrum signals, which are distributed over a wide range of frequencies and then
collected onto their original frequency at the receiver, are so inconspicuous as to be
'transparent.' Just as they are unlikely to be intercepted by a military opponent, so
are they unlikely to interfere with other signals intended for business and consumer
users -- even ones transmitted on the same frequencies. Such an advantage opens
up crowded frequency spectra to vastly expanded use.
"A case in point is a two-year demonstration project the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) authorized in May (1990) for Houston, Texas, and Orlando,
Fla. In both places, a new spread spectrum personal communications network
(PCN) will share the 1.85-1.9-gigahertz band with local electric and gas utilities.
The FCC licensee, Millicom Inc., a New York City-based cellular telephone
company, expects to enlist 45000 subscribers.
"The demonstration is intended to show that spread-spectrum users can share a
frequency band with conventional microwave radio users--without one group
interfering with the other -- thereby increasing the efficiency with which that band
is used. . . . "
The use of these special pseudo noise codes in spread spectrum (SS)
communications makes signals appear wide band and noise-like. It is this very
characteristic that makes SS signals possess the quality of Low Probability of
Intercept. SS signals are hard to detect on narrow band equipment because the
signal's energy is spread over a bandwidth of maybe 100 times the information
bandwidth.
The spread of energy over a wide band, or lower spectral power density, makes SS
signals less likely to interfere with narrowband communications. Narrow band
communications, conversely, cause little to no interference to SS systems because
the correlation receiver effectively integrates over a very wide bandwidth to
recover an SS signal. The correlator then "spreads" out a narrow band interferer
over the receiver's total detection bandwidth. Since the total integrated signal
density or SNR at the correlator's input determines whether there will be
interference or not. All SS systems have a threshold or tolerance level of
interference beyond which useful communication ceases. This tolerance or
threshold is related to the SS processing gain. Processing gain is essentially the
ratio of the RF bandwidth to the information bandwidth.
A typical commercial direct sequence radio, might have a processing gain of from
11 to 16 dB, depending on data rate. It can tolerate total jammer power levels of
from 0 to 5 dB stronger than the desired signal. Yes, the system can work at
negative SNR in the RF bandwidth. Because of the processing gain of the
receiver's correlator, the system functions at positive SNR on the baseband data.
Besides being hard to intercept and jam, spread spectrum signals are hard to exploit
or spoof. Signal exploitation is the ability of an enemy (or a non-network member)
to listen in to a network and use information from the network without being a
valid network member or participant. Spoofing is the act of falsely or maliciously
introducing misleading or false traffic or messages to a network. SS signals also
are naturally more secure than narrowband radio communications. Thus SS signals
can be made to have any degree of message privacy that is desired. Messages can
also, be cryptographically encoded to any level of secrecy desired. The very nature
of SS allows military or intelligence levels of privacy and security to be had with
minimal complexity. While these characteristics may not be very important to
everyday business and LAN (local area network) needs, these features are
important to understand.
Some Spread Spectrum Terms Defined
Spread spectrum technology seems to present an alphabet soup to most
newcomers. We define some of the more commonly used terms in this field in the
following text box. For a complete glossary, see our complete Glossary.
UANs use very small aperture (VSAT) earth station gateway technology.
Conclusion
Our world is rapidly changing -- computers have gone from mainframes to
palmtops. Radio communications has gone from lunchbox sized (or trunk
mounted/remote handset car phone) to cigarette-pack-sized micro-cellular
telephone technology. The technical challenges of this progress are significant. The
new opportunities created by this new technology are also significant. We've talked
here about some of the very basic principles in spread spectrum and talked about
evolving career opportunities -- isn't it time somebody did something about moving
forward in the new millennium?