0% found this document useful (0 votes)
180 views

Management by Objectives

MBO stands for Management by Objectives. These are extremely useful for students of B.Com., M.Com., BBA and MBA.

Uploaded by

Mohit Puri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
180 views

Management by Objectives

MBO stands for Management by Objectives. These are extremely useful for students of B.Com., M.Com., BBA and MBA.

Uploaded by

Mohit Puri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

Management By Objectives: Concept and Process

Management by objectives
Management by objectives (MBO) is a process of defining objectives within an organization so
that management and employees agree to the objectives and understand what they need to do in
the organization. The term "management by objectives" was first popularized by Peter Drucker
in his 1954 book 'The Practice of Management'. The essence of MBO is participative goal
setting, choosing course of actions and decision making. An important part of the MBO is the
measurement and the comparison of the employees actual performance with the standards set.
Ideally, when employees themselves have been involved with the goal setting and choosing the
course of action to be followed by them, they are more likely to fulfill their responsibilities.
According to George S. Odiorne, the system of management by objectives can be described as a
process whereby the superior and subordinate managers of an organization jointly identify its
common goals, define each individual's major areas of responsibility in terms of the results
expected of him, and use these measures as guides for operating the unit and assessing the
contribution of each of its members.
Definition
Management by objectives is a dynamic system which seeks to integrate the company's need to
clarify and achieve its profit and growth goals with the manager's need to contribute and develop
himself. It is a demanding and rewarding style of managing a business.
Explanation
Since the best managers have always practised management by objectives, the cynic's view that
it is merely old wine in new bottles is perhaps valid. However, it is timely and useful to restate
basic principles and to demonstrate that there is a practical approach which will help all
managers to improve their performance. Companies are meeting increased pressures of
competition and rising costs and managements task is becoming more complex with
accelerating changes in markets, technology, and social environment. Yet, many companies are
content to follow tradition based on past success. The explosive growth in knowledge had led to
more specialisation, with the result that fewer general managers and entrepreneurial types are
being produced. Moreover, the time span and range of objectives set by companies is often
dangerously restricted. Management by objectives must create a climate of opinion in which
these and other problems are recognised as well as providing the framework of techniques for
solving them.
Illustration
When a worthwhile system of management by objectives is operating in a company there is a
continuous process of:

1.
2.

3.
4.
i.
ii.
5.
6.
7.

Reviewing critically, and restating, the companys strategic and tactical plans.
Clarifying with each manager the key results and performance standards he must
achieve, in line with unit and company objectives, and gaining his contribution and commitment
to these.
Agreeing with each manager a job improvement plan, which makes a measurable and
realistic contribution to the unit and companys plans for better performance.
Providing conditions in which it is possible to achieve the key results and improvement
plans, notably:
An organisation structure which gives a manager maximum freedom and
flexibility in operation.
Management control information in a form, and at a frequency, which makes for
more effective self-control and better and quicker decisions.
Using systematic performance review to measure and discuss progress towards results,
and potential review to identify men with potential for advancement.
Developing management training plans to help each manager to overcome his
weaknesses, to build on his strengths, and to accept a responsibility for self-development.
Strengthening a manager's motivation by effective selection, salary, and succession plans.
These techniques are interdependent and the dynamic nature of the system can be shown as in
the diagram above. It follows that the development of managers, which is a matter of vital
importance to every company, only makes sense if it is integrated with the purpose of the
business. Looked at in this way, management development is a valuable by-product of running a
business efficiently.
Features and advantages
Unique features and advantages of the MBO process
The principle behind Management by Objectives (MBO) is for employees to have a clear
understanding of the roles and responsibilities expected of them. They can then understand how
their activities relate to the achievement of the organization's goal. MBO also places importance
on fulfilling the personal goals of each employee.
Some of the important features and advantages of MBO are:
1. Motivation Involving employees in the whole process of goal setting and increasing
employee empowerment. This increases employee job satisfaction and commitment.
2. Better communication and Coordination Frequent reviews and interactions between
superiors and subordinates helps to maintain harmonious relationships within the
organization and also to solve many problems.
3. Clarity of goals

4. Subordinates tend to have a higher commitment to objectives they set for themselves than
those imposed on them by another person.
5. Managers can ensure that objectives of the subordinates are linked to the organization's
objectives.

Domains and levels


Objectives can be set in all domains of activities (production, marketing, services, sales, R&D,
human resources, finance, information systems etc.). Some objectives are collective, for a whole
department or the whole company, others can be individualized.
Practice
Objectives need quantifying and monitoring. Reliable management information systems are
needed to establish relevant objectives and monitor their "reach ratio" in an objective way. Pay
incentives (bonuses) are often linked to results in reaching the objectives.
Limitations
There are several limitations to the assumptive base underlying the impact of managing by
objectives, including:

1. It over-emphasizes the setting of goals over the working of a plan as a driver of outcomes.
2. It underemphasizes the importance of the environment or context in which the goals are set.
That context includes everything from the availability and quality of resources, to relative buy-in
by leadership and stake-holders. As an example of the influence of management buy-in as a
contextual influencer, in a 1991 comprehensive review of thirty years of research on the impact
of Management by Objectives, Robert Rodgers and John Hunter concluded that companies
whose CEOs demonstrated high commitment to MBO showed, on average, a 56% gain in
productivity. Companies with CEOs who showed low commitment only saw a 6% gain in
productivity.
3. Companies evaluated their employees by comparing them with the "ideal" employee. Trait
appraisal only looks at what employees should be, not at what they should do.
When this approach is not properly set, agreed and managed by organizations, self-centered
employees might be prone to distort results, falsely representing achievement of targets that were
set in a short-term, narrow fashion. In this case, managing by objectives would be
counterproductive. The use of MBO must be carefully aligned with the culture of the
organization. While MBO is not as fashionable as it was before, it still has its place in
management today. The key difference is that rather than 'set' objectives from a cascade process,
objectives are discussed and agreed upon. Employees are often involved in this process, which
can be advantageous. A saying around MBO "What gets measured gets done", Why measure
performance? Different purposes require different measures is perhaps the most famous
aphorism of performance measurement; therefore, to avoid potential problems SMART and
SMARTER objectives need to be agreed upon in the true sense rather than set.
Arguments against
MBO has its detractors, notably among them W. Edwards Deming, who argued that a lack of
understanding of systems commonly results in the misapplication of objectives. Additionally,
Deming stated that setting production targets will encourage resources to meet those targets
through whatever means necessary, which usually results in poor quality. Point 7 of Deming's
key principles encourages managers to abandon objectives in favour of leadership because he felt
that a leader with an understanding of systems was more likely to guide workers to an
appropriate solution than the incentive of an objective. Deming also pointed out that Drucker
warned managers that a systemic view was required and felt that Drucker's warning went largely
unheeded by the practitioners of MBO.
LIFE SKETCH OF PETER DRUCKER WHO GAVE THE CONCEPT OF MBO
Drucker's books and scholarly and popular articles explored how humans are organized across
the business, government and the nonprofit sectors of society. He is one of the best-known and
most widely influential thinkers and writers on the subject of management theory and practice.
His writings have predicted many of the major developments of the late twentieth century,
including privatization and decentralization; the rise of Japan to economic world power; the
decisive importance of marketing; and the emergence of the information society with its

necessity of lifelong learning. In 1959, Drucker coined the term knowledge worker" and later in
his life considered knowledge worker productivity to be the next frontier of management. The
annual Global Peter Drucker Forum in his hometown of Vienna Austria, honors his legacy.
Drucker was both on his paternal and his maternal side of Jewish descent, but his parents
converted to Christianity and lived in what he referred to as a "liberal" Lutheran Protestant
household in Austria-Hungary. His mother Caroline Bondi had studied medicine and his father
Adolf Drucker was a lawyer and high-level civil servant. Drucker was born in Vienna, the capital
of Austria, in a small village named Kaasgraben (now part of the 19th district of Vienna,
Dobling). He grew up in a home where intellectuals, high government officials, and scientists
would meet to discuss new ideas. In 1934 Drucker married Doris Schmitz, an acquaintance from
the University of Frankfurt. Their wedding certificate lists his name as "Peter Georg Drucker".
They had four children and six grandchildren and lived in Claremont, California. After
graduating from Dobling Gymnasium, Drucker found few opportunities for employment in postWorld War Vienna, so he moved to Hamburg, Germany, first working as an apprentice at an
established cotton trading company, then as a journalist, writing for Der Osterreichische
Volkswirt (The Austrian Economist). Drucker then moved to Frankfurt, where he took a job at the
Daily Frankfurter General-Anzeiger. While in Frankfurt, he also earned a doctorate in
international law and public law from the University of Frankfurt in 1931.
In 1933, Drucker left Germany for England. In London, he worked for an insurance company,
then as the chief economist at a private bank. He also reconnected with Doris Schmitz, an
acquaintance from the University of Frankfurt whom he married in 1934. The couple
permanently relocated to the United States, where he became a university professor as well as a
free-lance writer and business consultant. In 1943, Drucker became a naturalized citizen of the
United States. He then had a distinguished career as a teacher, first as a professor of politics and
philosophy at Bennington College from 19421949, then for more than twenty years at New
York University as a Professor of Management from 1950 to 1971.
Drucker came to California in 1971, where he developed one of the country's first executive
MBA programs for working professionals at Claremont Graduate University (then known as
Claremont Graduate School). From 1971 to his death he was the Clarke Professor of Social
Science and Management at Claremont Graduate University. Claremont Graduate University's
management school was named the "Peter F. Drucker Graduate School of Management" in his
honor in 1987 (later renamed the "Peter F. Drucker and Masatoshi Ito Graduate School of
Management"). He taught his last class there in 2002 at age 92. Drucker also continued to act as
a consultant to businesses and non-profit organizations well into his nineties. He died November
11, 2005 in Claremont, California of natural causes at 95.
Among Peter Drucker's early influences was the Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter, a friend
of his fathers, who impressed upon Drucker the importance of innovation and entrepreneurship.
Drucker was also influenced, in a much different way, by John Maynard Keynes, whom he heard
lecture in 1934 in Cambridge. I suddenly realized that Keynes and all the brilliant economic
students in the room were interested in the behavior of commodities, Drucker wrote, while I
was interested in the behavior of people.

Over the next 70 years, Druckers writings would be marked by a focus on relationships among
human beings, as opposed to the crunching of numbers. His books were filled with lessons on
how organizations can bring out the best in people, and how workers can find a sense of
community and dignity in a modern society organized around large institutions. As a business
consultant, Drucker disliked the term guru, though it was often applied to him; I have been
saying for many years, Drucker once remarked, that we are using the word guru only because
charlatan is too long to fit into a headline.
As a young writer, Drucker wrote two pieces one on the conservative German philosopher
Friedrich Julius Stahl and another called The Jewish Question in Germany that were burned
and banned by the Nazis.
Peter Drucker as The 'business thinker'
Drucker's career as a business thinker took off in 1942, when his initial writings on politics and
society won him access to the internal workings of General Motors (GM), one of the largest
companies in the world at that time. His experiences in Europe had left him fascinated with the
problem of authority. He shared his fascination with Donaldson Brown, the mastermind behind
the administrative controls at GM. In 1943 Brown invited him in to conduct what might be called
a "political audit": a two-year social-scientific analysis of the corporation. Drucker attended
every board meeting, interviewed employees, and analyzed production and decision-making
processes.
The resulting book, Concept of the Corporation, popularized GM's multidivisional structure and
led to numerous articles, consulting engagements, and additional books. GM, however, was
hardly thrilled with the final product. Drucker had suggested that the auto giant might want to
reexamine a host of long-standing policies on customer relations, dealer relations, employee
relations and more. Inside the corporation, Druckers counsel was viewed as hypercritical. GM's
revered chairman, Alfred Sloan, was so upset about the book that he simply treated it as if it did
not exist, Drucker later recalled, never mentioning it and never allowing it to be mentioned in
his presence.
Drucker taught that management is a liberal art, and he infused his management advice with
interdisciplinary lessons from history, sociology, psychology, philosophy, culture and religion.
He also believed strongly that all institutions, including those in the private sector, have a
responsibility to the whole of society. The fact is, Drucker wrote in his 1973 Management:
Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices, that in modern society there is no other leadership group but
managers. If the managers of our major institutions, and especially of business, do not take
responsibility for the common good, no one else can or will.
Drucker was interested in the growing effect of people who worked with their minds rather than
their hands. He was intrigued by employees who knew more about certain subjects than their
bosses or colleagues and yet had to cooperate with others in a large organization. Rather than
simply glorify the phenomenon as the epitome of human progress, Drucker analyzed it and
explained how it challenged the common thinking about how organizations should be run. His
approach worked well in the increasingly mature business world of the second half of the

twentieth century. By that time, large corporations had developed the basic manufacturing
efficiencies and managerial hierarchies of mass production. Executives thought they knew how
to run companies, and Drucker took it upon himself to poke holes in their beliefs, lest
organizations become stale. But he did so in a sympathetic way. He assumed that his readers
were intelligent, rational, hardworking people of good will. If their organizations struggled, he
believed it was usually because of outdated ideas, a narrow conception of problems, or internal
misunderstandings.
Consulting career of Peter Drucker
During his long consulting career, Drucker worked with many major corporations, including
General Electric, Coca-Cola, Citicorp, IBM, and Intel. He consulted with notable business
leaders such as GEs Jack Welch; Procter & Gambles A.G. Lafley; Intels Andy Grove; Edward
Jones John Bachmann; Shoichiro Toyoda, the honorary chairman of Toyota Motor Corp.; and
Masatoshi Ito, the honorary chairman of the Ito-Yokado Group, the second largest retailing
organization in the world. Although he helped many corporate executives succeed, he was
appalled when the level of Fortune 500 CEO pay in America ballooned to hundreds of times that
of the average worker. He argued in a 1984 essay that CEO compensation should be no more
than 20 times what the rank and file make especially at companies where thousands of
employees are being laid off. This is morally and socially unforgivable, Drucker wrote, and
we will pay a heavy price for it.
Drucker served as a consultant for various government agencies in the United States, Canada and
Japan. He worked with various nonprofit organizations to help them become successful, often
consulting pro bono. Among the many social-sector groups he advised were the Salvation Army,
the Girl Scouts of the USA, C.A.R.E., the American Red Cross, and the Navajo Indian Tribal
Council. In fact, Drucker anticipated the rise of the social sector in America, maintaining that it
was through volunteering in nonprofits that people would find the kind of fulfillment that he
originally thought would be provided through their place of work, but that had proven elusive in
that arena. Citizenship in and through the social sector is not a panacea for the ills of postcapitalist society and post-capitalist polity, but it may be a prerequisite for tackling these ills,
Drucker wrote. It restores the civic responsibility that is the mark of citizenship, and the civic
pride that is the mark of community.
Drucker's writings
Drucker's 39 books have been translated into more than thirty languages. Two are novels, one an
autobiography. He is the co-author of a book on Japanese painting, and made eight series of
educational films on management topics. He also penned a regular column in the Wall Street
Journal for 10 years and contributed frequently to the Harvard Business Review, The Atlantic
Monthly, and The Economist. His work is especially popular in Japan, even more so after the
publication of "What If the Female Manager of a High-School Baseball Team Read Druckers
Management", a novel that features the main character using one of his books to great effect,
which was also adapted into an anime and a live action film. His popularity in Japan may be
compared with that of his contemporary W. Edwards Deming.

Peter Drucker also wrote a book in 2001 called "The Essential Drucker". It is the first volume
and combination of the past sixteen years of Peter Drucker's work on management. The
information gather is a collection from his previous findings, The Practice of Management
(1954) to Management Challenges for the 21st Century (1999), this book offers, in Drucker's
words, "a coherent and fairly comprehensive introduction to management". He also answers
frequently asked questions from up and coming entrepreneurs who wonder the questionable
outcomes of management.
Main publications by Drucker

1939: The End of Economic Man

1942: The Future of Industrial Man

1946: Concept of the Corporation

1950: The New Society

1954: The Practice of Management

1957: America's Next Twenty Years

1959: Landmarks of Tomorrow

1964: Managing for Results

1967: The Effective Executive

1969: The Age of Discontinuity

1970: Technology, Management and Society

1971: Men, Ideas and Politics

1973: Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices

1976: The Unseen Revolution: How Pension Fund Socialism Came to America

1977: People and Performance: The Best of Peter Drucker on Management

1977: An Introductory View of Management

1979: Song of the Brush: Japanese Painting from Sanso Collection

1979: Adventures of a Bystander

1980: Managing in Turbulent Times

1981: Toward the Next Economics and Other Essays

1982: The Changing World of Executive

1982: The Last of All Possible Worlds

1984: The Temptation to Do Good

1985: Innovation and Entrepreneurship

1986: The Frontiers of Management: Where Tomorrow's Decisions are Being Shaped
Today

1989: The New Realities: in Government and Politics, in Economics and Business, in
Society and World View

1990: Managing the Nonprofit Organization: Practices and Principles

1992: Managing for the Future

1993: The Ecological Vision

1993: Post-Capitalist Society

1995: Managing in a Time of Great Change

1997: Drucker on Asia: A Dialogue between Peter Drucker and Isao Nakauchi

1998: Peter Drucker on the Profession of Management

1999: Management Challenges for 21st Century

2001: The Essential Drucker

2002: Managing in the Next Society

2002: The Functioning Society

2004: The Daily Drucker

2006: The Effective Executive in Action

Key ideas
Several ideas run through most of Drucker's writings:

Decentralization and simplification. Drucker discounted the command and control model
and asserted that companies work best when they are decentralized. According to Drucker,
corporations tend to produce too many products, hire employees they don't need (when a
better solution would be outsourcing), and expand into economic sectors that they should
avoid.

The concept of "Knowledge Worker" in his 1959 book "The Landmarks of Tomorrow".
Since then, knowledge-based work has become increasingly important in businesses
worldwide.

The prediction of the death of the "Blue Collar" worker. A blue collar worker is a typical
high school dropout who was paid middle class wages with all benefits for assembling cars
in Detroit. The changing face of the US Auto Industry is a testimony to this prediction.

The concept of what eventually came to be known as "outsourcing." He used the example
of front room and a back room of each business: A company should be engaged in only the
front room activities that are core to supporting its business. Back room activities should be
handed over to other companies, for whom these are the front room activities.

The importance of the non-profit sector, which he calls the third sector (private sector and
the Government sector being the first two.) Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) play
crucial roles in countries around the world.

A profound skepticism of macroeconomic theory. Drucker contended that economists of


all schools fail to explain significant aspects of modern economies.

Respect of the worker. Drucker believed that employees are assets and not liabilities. He
taught that knowledgeable workers are the essential ingredients of the modern economy.
Central to this philosophy is the view that people are an organization's most valuable
resource, and that a manager's job is both to prepare people to perform and give them
freedom to do so.

A belief in what he called "the sickness of government." Drucker made nonpartisan


claims that government is often unable or unwilling to provide new services that people need
or want, though he believed that this condition is not inherent to the form of government.
The chapter "The Sickness of Government" in his book The Age of Discontinuity formed the
basis of New Public Management, a theory of public administration that dominated the
discipline in the 1980s and 1990s.

The need for "planned abandonment." Businesses and governments have a natural human
tendency to cling to "yesterday's successes" rather than seeing when they are no longer
useful.
A belief that taking action without thinking is the cause of every failure.

The need for community. Early in his career, Drucker predicted the "end of economic
man" and advocated the creation of a "plant community" where an individual's social needs
could be met. He later acknowledged that the plant community never materialized, and by
the 1980s, suggested that volunteering in the nonprofit sector was the key to fostering a
healthy society where people found a sense of belonging and civic pride.

The need to manage business by balancing a variety of needs and goals, rather than
subordinating an institution to a single value. This concept of management by objectives
forms the keynote of his 1954 landmark The Practice of Management.

A company's primary responsibility is to serve its customers. Profit is not the primary
goal, but rather an essential condition for the company's continued existence.

An organization should have a proper way of executing all its business processes.
A belief in the notion that great companies could stand among humankind's noblest
inventions.

Criticism of Drucker's work


The Wall Street Journal researched several of his lectures in 1987 and reported that he was
sometimes loose with the facts. Drucker was off the mark, for example, when he told an audience
that English was the official language for all employees at Japans Mitsui trading company.
(Druckers defense: I use anecdotes to make a point, not to write history.) And while he was
known for his prescience, he wasnt always correct in his forecasts. He predicted, for instance,
that the nations financial center would shift from New York to Washington. Others maintain that
one of Druckers core conceptsmanagement by objectivesis flawed and has never really
been proven to work effectively. Critic Dale Krueger said that the system is difficult to
implement, and that companies often wind up overemphasizing control, as opposed to fostering
creativity, to meet their goals. Drucker's classic Concept of the Corporation criticized General
Motors at a time when it was, in some ways, the most successful corporation in the world. Many
of GM's executives considered Drucker persona non grata for a long time afterward. Alfred P.
Sloan refrained from personal hostility toward Drucker, but even Sloan considered Drucker's
critiques of GM's management to be "dead wrong".
Awards and honors
Drucker was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by U.S. President George W. Bush on
July 9, 2002. He also received honors from the governments of Japan and Austria. He was the

Honorary Chairman of the Peter F. Drucker Foundation for Nonprofit Management, now the
Leader to Leader Institute, from 1990 through 2002. In 1969 he was awarded New York
Universitys highest honor, the NYU Presidential Citation. Harvard Business Review honored
Drucker in the June 2004 with his seventh McKinsey Award for his article, "What Makes an
Effective Executive", the most awarded to one person. Drucker was inducted into the Junior
Achievement U.S. Business Hall of Fame in 1996. Additionally he holds 25 honorary doctorates
from American, Belgian, Czech, English, Spanish and Swiss Universities. In Claremont,
California, Eleventh Street between College Avenue and Dartmouth Avenue was renamed
"Drucker Way" in October 2009 to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Drucker's birth.
Questions
Q1. Define Management by objectives (MBO).
Q2. What are the major characteristics of Organization behavior?
Q3. Briefly explain Evolution and nature of Organizational Behavior.
Q4. Briefly explain fundamental theories in organization behavior.
Q5. What is Virtual Organization?
Q6. What are the limitations of OB?

You might also like