Data Fusion in Geospatial Applications
Data Fusion in Geospatial Applications
Data fusion, is generally defined as the use of techniques that combine data
from multiple sources and gather that information in order to achieve inferences,
which will be more efficient and potentially more accurate than if they were
achieved by means of a single source.
Fusion processes are often categorized as low, intermediate or high, depending
on the processing stage at which fusion takes place.[1] Low level fusion, (Data
fusion) combines several sources of raw data to produce new raw data. The
expectation is that fused data is more informative and synthetic than the original
inputs.
For example, sensor fusion is also known as (multi-sensor) Data fusion and is a
subset of information fusion.
Contents
[hide]
4 See also
4.1 Application areas
5 References
6 General references
7 Books
8 External links
[edit]Data
In the geospatial (GIS) domain, data fusion is often synonymous with data
integration. In these applications, there is often a need to combine diverse data
sets into a unified (fused) data set which includes all of the data points and time
steps from the input data sets. The fused data set is different from a simple
combined superset in that the points in the fused data set contain attributes and
metadata which might not have been included for these points in the original data
set.
A simplified example of this process is shown below where data set "" is fused
with data set to form the fused data set . Data points in set "" have spatial
coordinates X and Y and attributes A1 and A2. Data points in set have spatial
coordinates X and Y and attributes B1 and B2. The fused data set contains all
points and attributes
Input Data Set
Point
A1
A2
10
10
10
30
30
10
30
30
B1
B2
20
20
20
40
40
20
40
40
A1
A2
B1
B2
10
10
10
30
30
10
30
30
20
20
20
40
40
20
40
40
In this simple case all attributes are uniform across the entire analysis domain, so
attributes may be simply assigned. In more realistic applications, attributes are
rarely uniform and some type of interpolation is usually required to properly
assign attributes to the data points in the fused set.
Data integration might be viewed as set combination wherein the larger set is
retained, whereas fusion is a set reduction technique with improved confidence.
[edit]Data
In the mid-1980s, the Joint Directors of Laboratories formed the Data Fusion
Subpanel (which later became known as the Data Fusion Group). The JDL/DFG
introduced a model of data fusion that divided the various processes into 5
levels:
Level 0: Source Preprocessing/subobject refinement
Level 1: Object refinement
Level 2: Situation refinement
Level 3: Impact Assessment
Level 4: Process Refinement
Although the JDL Model is still in use today, it is often criticized for its implication
that the levels necessarily happen in order from 0-4 and also for its lack of
adequate representation of the potential for a human-in-the-loop. Despite these
shortcomings, the JDL model is useful for visualizing the data fusion process and
also for facilitating discussion and common understanding (Hall et al. 2007).