The Time Bubble

Does time really exist?

By

Erne Venn

Einstein was a cheat, a liar, a plagiarist and dutiful puppet of the dark elitist forces that has enslaved
all mankind in the name of falsism. WAKE UP and take your honourable place at the table of
universal beings seeking truths and freedom from oppression.

Do you really understand time?

By reading this booklet you will understand how and why your knowledge and creative
imagination is being seriously inhibited by embracing the formal education systems. Just
because you are taught facts at school, college and university doesnt mean they are truths.
All truths have been hidden from common man by the Elitists to keep the populous in slavery
ad infinitum unless you awaken! Why else is it legally enforceable, by prison sentence and
child confiscation by local authorities, if you fail to send your kids to school - brainwashing?
Reading this booklet will expose the lies and help the universal awakening programme.
We are taught we live our lives bounded within the set of physical constraints normally
expressed as three dimensions - length, width and height. Time exists because it is
considered to be the fourth dimension, according to Einsteinium stolen physics, that causes
all life forms to age and eventually die a physical death your spirit is eternal, so dont worry
because physical death is not the end of all things wondrous this universe can offer.
Cosmologists tell us time started when the Big Bang happened which they put the age of
the universe as approximately 13.8 billion years. Their calculation is based upon our current
understanding of the accepted rules of modern physics as we know them combined with
some universal constants all plugged into an equation that is the best guess the
physicists/cosmologists can come up with. I have more to say on errors using mathematical
predictions later in this booklet. So, to understand time we really need to firstly understand
what the Big Bang theory is.
So what is the Big Bang theory?
In a nutshell cosmologist Stephen Hawking surmised that because he thinks the universe is
forever expanding then we should be able to rewind the clock of creation until it reads zero
then watch the birth of the universe. Since we are told everything in the universe is getting
further apart Hawking assumed by rewinding the clock all matter will eventually collapse into
a single entity thereby vanishing in on itself.
The Big Bang Theory is a suggestion that all creation screamed through a hole that has no
defined location, in what fabric we do not know, smaller than an atom allowing mass to
emerge thereby creating all physical objects we now call the Universe. Now, that sounds
bizarre because it implies all the stuff which makes up the Universe was queuing up on the
other side of the hole, nice and orderly, ready to perfectly form stars, planets and every
physical object on this side of the hole. Maybe the hole was a reverse operating
mischievous black hole my cynical joke.
Unless the physicist accepts a greater being than their science created this wondrous
Universe they are basing their science on cosmic luck for without creation rules this could
never have happened. The odds of a cosmic luck Big Bang explanation for the existence of
the living Universe is so small, significantly less than winning the lottery on ten million
successive occasions, that it is as close to zero probability as anything can be, Would you
place your lifes savings on The Big Bang running in The Grand National when its odds are
an astronomical Googolplex to 1 to win? Of course you wouldnt but this is exactly what the
scientists around the world are doing, using your tax monies to fund their ridiculous
experiments in the hope of building bigger and more destructive WMD for the elitists.
The Drake equation is: N = R = R* fp ne fl fi fc L. N represents the possible number of
communicating civilizations throughout the universe. Even Drake took for granted the
existence of the universe, life supporting planets, sophisticated communication technologies,
chemistry and biology that literally thrive on the life supporting planets. This implies the Big
Bang Theory had all this detail built in, but it doesnt!

3
Another major problem with The Big Bang Theory is the speed of expansion of the Universe
from birth must have exceeded the speed of light, by a factor of 60, according to many
physicists; in total disagreement with Einsteins theories! Does this mean Einsteins theories
are wrong or The Big Bang Theory is wrong or possibly both are wrong? It is obvious both
cannot be correct, even allowing for the fiddle factors of string theory and 11 dimensions, let
alone dark matter, dark energy and black holes!
A new physics is being proposed suggesting a variable speed of light is what is really
happening, not fixed as Einstein proclaimed; meaning the cosmic speed cop will soon be
retired! This theory was first suggested by the Canadian scientist John Moffat back in 1992.
According to physicist Joo Magueijo, the cosmological expansion appears to be
accelerating, implying that on large scales gravitys repulsive force is causing the
acceleration. Who is right Joo Magueijo or Albert Einstein or dare I say both are wrong?
Theoretical physicists never perform experiments; they develop mathematical models and
put their faith both in their own models and all earlier models such as relativistic theories.
These earlier theoretical models act like support structures for the new models. So, if the
support structures are unsound the house of mathematical physics will tumble just like the
house of cards you built as a kid!
The theoretical physicist Peter Higgs used mathematical techniques to suggest the
existence of what is now called the God Particle first mathematically predicted in 1964. His
mathematical theory builds upon Einsteins Special theory of relativity as an underpinning
mathematical support structure. If Einsteins Special theory of relativity is wrong then
concepts like the Higgs Boson and string theory are out of the window. I have more to say
about relativity and mathematical modelling at the end of this booklet.
The particle physicist will tell you their experiments prove Einsteins theoretical models to be
sound but where is their evidence? They expect us to believe the faster we travel the more
mass we gain. Based on this you fitness fanatics better give up jogging or face getting fat by
running too fast!
Back in Isaac Newtons day gravity was believed to be an attractive force because he
observed and proved by experiments objects fell to the ground here on Earth, a great piece
of work in his day; and without the need for particle accelerators. The idea that gravity
could also be a repulsive force is not going down too well with todays particle physicists.
Maybe dynamic gravity, first suggested by Nikola Tesla, also has a place in Joo Magueijos
theories. However, many scientists and theosophists believe gravity is a form of magnetic
force thereby allowing for both attractive and repulsive forces.
Quote from Professor Brian Cox: The biological process which leads to intelligent life on
Earth was a fluke that is unlikely to have been repeated anywhere else in the universe. This
pretty boy of physics is a stooge, a dutiful slave of the elitist and a highly paid TV icon sent
out to speak rhetoric and lies leading the mindless sheep using his professorial status and
boyish charisma to convince us that his science is beyond question. Brian Cox, just like his
TV science shows, is without foundation and should be totally ignored.
Quote from Stephen Hawking: A living being usually has two elements: a set of instructions
that tells the system how to sustain and reproduce itself, and a mechanism to carry out the
instructions. I challenge you, Stephen Hawking, to use this statement to explain your Big
Bang Theory, for without creation rules your theory is meaningless.
Contradictions such as the above puts doubt in the minds of the people as to what really
happened at the point of creation. Religious texts tell us the creator of all things known by
the names: God, Allah, Brahma, Yahweh, The Lord, El Shaddai, El Elyon, El Roi and El
Yisrael took 6 days to create the Universe of which Earth is just one tiny planet in the back of

4
beyond. These texts recorded it was the will of the creator that created all things by only
having to say: Be! and it is. This is in total conflict with the physicists views of matter
which forms their basis for all of creation! But what is matter and can it be subdivided into
tiny bits called charged particles as particle physicists believe?
The physicists view of matter is best described by the Greek philosopher Democritus (c.470
c.380BC) who suggested all matter could be subdivided until it reached its smallest particle
state which he named atomos, which In Greek means indivisible. This definition perplexed
Greek philosophers as to the nature of matter being continuous or discontinuous in form.
Can you continue to break matter into smaller and smaller bits forever? Or, in theory, could
you keep up the process of division forever? In theoretical work we can divide any
theoretical object ad infinitum. But maybe thats what wrong with trusting in theory if we
cannot perform the actions in the world we live in.
The concept of the atom as in atomic theory is that after decades of research no one has yet
seen a single atom. Yet todays atomic physics relies totally upon the existence of the atom!
It was Niels Bohr who in 1913 suggested the atom composed a small, positively charged
nucleus surrounded by negatively charged electrons travelling in circular orbits around the
nucleus, a bit like our solar system behaves, suggesting as above, so below. If you feel
uncomfortable with these physics explanations, as I do, then think of an atom as a very,
very tiny pliable, but not divisible, Lego brick where anything can be constructed and
brought to life by an external energy field that permeates all things. Over the decades there
have been extensions to Bohrs model but again still only as theories.
Assuming time is real and was part of the creation story then surely the time clock did start
at the point of creation agreed? Well, this is what physicists and cosmologists believe
because they have aged the Universe according to events after the Big Bang. This was
when all matter first burst onto the scene of an empty canvas and miraculously painted all
the galaxies, the suns, the planets, the asteroids and all chemical bonds that became the
basis for life to exist upon all planets such as Earth throughout all the galaxies in the
Universe.
Right now many physicists are still confused because back in 2011 the physicists working on
the OPERA experiment measured extremely small particles, physicists call neutrinos, which
travelled faster than the speed of light! This cannot be allowed because if it was true all of
Einsteins relativity is wrong, meaning all the physics text books should be thrown away!
Well, guess what has happened since that historic discovery? The experimenters have since
stated they made a mistake in the setup of the experiment, meaning Einsteins theories still
hold up; how absolutely convenient for the elite controllers of planet Earth.
What was around before the Big Bang; that is before we started the clock of creation?
Nothing says the physicists. So, from nothing comes all matter that makes up the Universe.
Is this an acceptable, logical and a rigorous explanation as to our being? Of course not! It is
ludicrous to even contemplate such a crazy concept. This is why the worlds top physicists
invented the Big Bang concept because they know no more than you and I as to how the
Universe came into being. They will tell you the Universe is expanding but they cannot
explain what force is causing it to expand. The only explanation they offer is the force from
the Big Bang is continuing to cause the expansion. If the Big Bang theory, and it is only a
theory, is wrong then something else is causing the Universe to expand. If there are hidden
forces causing the expansion then the physicist has yet to find them; meaning all bets are off
regarding the Big Bang theory.
So, out of a hole smaller than an atom screamed all the matter that eventually formed bonds
to create all the suns, planets and all life forms. It would appear this hole has miraculously
repaired itself thereby maintaining the fabric of the Universe, yeah right. We are also told

5
the suns are made up of a collection of gases; mostly hydrogen (72%) and helium (26%)
acting as massive nuclear fusion reactors suggesting they also happened to be part of the
cosmic luck explanations, really? To me and many others, there are too many assumptions
we are being asked to accept as truths. If I am an accelerated tiny piece of matter why
would I choose to bond with other tiny bits of matter to create suns and planets? The
physicist will tell you their gravitational forces pulled these tiny bits of matter together. This
implies their gravitational force is greater than the Big Bang force since it can draw together
accelerated bits of matter, but what is gravity? Nobody really knows what Newton called
gravity is or how it works, but its effects on physical matter can be measured. Measurement
is the truth yardstick for all physics; remember this.
Theosophists since the days of their founder Madame H. P. Blavatsky (1831-1891) have told
us consciousness creates matter that is eternal as is the spirit. Todays physicists are
attempting to explain consciousness with mathematical physics based on quantum theory to
discredit alternative views as to the creation theory. People, in general, find it hard to accept
non-scientific explanations as proof of anything making the scientists the new kids on the
block; but nothing could be further from the truth.
Blavatskys The Secret Doctrine, the Synthesis of Science, Religion and Philosophy
represents her training given to her by Asian teachers or Mahatmas. Here again is a
contradiction with the eternal spiritual existence and the constraining physics based laws,
both cannot be right.
Over the centuries many brilliantly minded men and women have struggled with this
question: Why is there anything at all? As none of this wondrous creation could be attributed
to cosmic luck you must accept a creator, or hosts of creators, architected all things. But this
contradicts our current scientific understanding if we accept the Big Bang theory as the
only possible creation story.
The physicists are bound within their own box of equations thereby only seeing the universe
in terms of incorrect mass based mathematical physics. To replace consciousness with
incorrect mathematical physics really shows how worried the physicists are that they will lose
their prestigious status to something they cannot measure. Humanity has been educated to
accept many falsities as truths in order to blind your senses and keep you in ignorance of the
truths making you the dutiful slaves to elitists powers currently controlling Earth.
Quote from Buddha: There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to the truth:
1) Not going all the way, and
2) Not starting:
We are told by archaeologists that modern intelligent humans have been on the Earth for
about 200,000 years; obviously older species existed but not intelligent species, so we are
told. We are also told by cosmologists that the universe is approximately 13.8 billion years
old which means we, the intelligent humanoids, are really new on the scene.
Now suppose you are a bacteria life form living on a human lung. You have just arrived on
the lung and experience the lung expanding (intake) and conclude, from your short
experience, this expansion will continue forever. You also notice neighbourhood mounds in
the skin are moving away from you at an accelerated rate. Being the most scientific bacteria
you publish your scientific measurements categorically stating the surface of your universe
is expanding at an accelerated rate.

6
However, long after your death the lung stops expanding and gradually starts to contract
(exhale). New bacteria conclude their forefathers had got it wrong and that in some distant
time in the future all will be crushed into oblivion when all things fall in on themselves! These
bacteria do not live long enough to know the lung is going through cycles of expansion and
contraction. Based on our short life on planet Earth how do we know our universe is not
cycling through stages of expansion and contraction? If gravity can be both a repulsive and
attractive force then oscillation of growth and contraction within the universe is certainly
possible.
If time does not exist then all bets are off concerning our current understanding of the
Universe as physicists tell us. If time is a creation rather than a physical truth then you and I
are living in an experiment created by super intelligent beings. But, why would such beings
create time, as here on Earth
How boring would it be to live forever with full knowledge of all things? Your life expectancy
is three score and ten years according to many historical and religious texts, equalling 70
Earth years, where one Earth year is defined as one complete orbit of Earth around our sun.
Not all humans live for 70years, some live much longer and others die at birth. This means
you must maximise your time to appreciate living the experiment.
Take a look around the World and apply scientific disciplines to the numerous architectural
wonders that date back many thousands of Earth years that are still standing, such as the
thousands of pyramids still standing in every continent around the World. Educational fact:
Cheops pyramid in Egypt was built c.25602540 BC as a burial chamber for Pharaoh Khufu
and is believed to be the oldest and largest pyramid in the world. This is a lie. The Bosnian
pyramids of the Sun and the Moon dwarf the pyramid Cheops in Egypt but academia, the
world over, are playing these huge structures down as not being manmade; as if Cheops
was. The Bosnian pyramids are covered with trees and vegetation that have been carbon
dated as just less than 25,000 years, meaning the Bosnian pyramids are at least 25,000
years old and probably much older. So, why would academia discredit the find, surely they
should embrace these new discoveries and reassess their first thoughts about Cheops and
the Mexican pyramids in the light of new evidence? This is but one example of educational
lies used to bury the truths.
Either humanity was much smarter many tens of thousands of years ago or other advanced
beings lived here on Earth who created, built and left such structures for us to learn from
definitely not to postulate they were burial chambers for kings and Pharaohs! If we were
smarter many thousands of years ago what has happened to dumb down the worlds
population because we sure cannot build such pyramids on every continent today? One
possible answer, I suggest, is the formal education systems are built upon falsities filling the
young minds with facts later to be tested by examinations that, if you pass, prove you have
been well and truly brainwashed.
Maybe, our spirits were sent to Earth to serve a prison sentence for breaking universal laws.
The longer you live the worse the crime you committed. How can the cosmic judge
determine a relevant prison sentence for your crimes against universal laws as written by the
architects of the universe? Humanity has created many legal frameworks which only exist to
protect the interests of the most powerful beings here on Earth. These legal frameworks
differ from country to country so which framework is right? All manmade legal frameworks
are fraudulent because they only serve to enslave all the people for the sole betterment of
the few, known as the elitists.

7
Maybe, we were put on Earth to experience physicality and learn lessons in the hope we can
take our physical experiences as teachers to other planets whose inhabitants are
desperately in need of the true knowledge to help them move forward. Do not reject this
hypothesis as it is the most likely of all hypotheses as to why you are here on planet Earth.
Have you ever had that feeling of dj vu? If you have and been proved right then how can
time truly exist when events you experience may be centuries apart implying many human
physical lives apart? One plausible explanation is all memories exist outside of the physical
being that can be accessed via a link to the thought originator, even after several physical
lives. How else can you link such events? In quantum physics the physicists talk about
quantum entanglement that defies all logic. They suggest two electrons created like birth
twins can be separated across millions of light years and what one electron does the other
does also instantly. Does this mean information between the two electrons travels infinitely
fast or is there an unknown connection that defies distance measurement and time? If
quantum entanglement exists then our understanding of time is definitely in doubt!
I hope you now appreciate time is not the simple concept we are led to believe. You
celebrate certain dates in the year such as birthdays, anniversaries and Christmas because
you believe in time as something real, constant and measurable.
If nothing existed before time zero then how come all things come into existence after time
zero? How can all matter burst onto the scene at time zero? If it did you must accept a
creator was responsible if not construct an alternative believable physics based
explanation. Surely, we all know how life began, not as simple as being lucky enough to be
existing on a habitual planet in a zone distant enough from the sun to have liquid water; but
as a creation spirit that flows through all of us. Your spirit is eternal, meaning it did not start
with a Big Bang, the Big Bang could never of happened; it is a physics based lie to
confuse you. All modern physics is self contradictory; meaning you are being lied to
repeatedly.
Many years ago as a student I imagined infinite dimensions existed where I could step from
one dimension to another creating a time line effect. Recall consciousness creates all
matter that shapes the dimensions I control. Having an infinite number of dimensions meant
all outcomes I envisaged were catered for until I stepped onto my physical death dimension.
With infinite dimensions there is no need for time procession as we know it. What is
interesting though is a backwards step could appear to be time travel as all dimensions are
available thereby allowing me to re-appear on a previous dimension.
According to atomic physics all matter is made up of atoms that are in themselves made up
of a nucleus combining protons and neutrons being orbited by the same number of electrons
as protons. Atoms oscillate at specific frequencies (why, we dont know), making them ideal
as the basis for accurate timing by simply counting, technically meaning locking an electronic
oscillator to the frequency of an oscillating atom. You need to ask yourself Why do atoms
vibrate and what internal/external forces are acting to cause the vibration? You can
speculate gravity, magnetic, nuclear or the invisible zero point energy is responsible.
Whatever nature the internal/external forces take we are unaware of how or why they exist.
To keep a regular vibration is like a park swing whereupon an external force needs to be
applied to the swing else it will cease to swing. What is the external force that acts upon
atoms? I suggest there is an 'all-pervasive' energy field that stimulates all things and life
forms throughout the universe causing all objects to vibrate. When this energy field
combines with the energy field of the sun all plant and animal life grows.

8
This idea should not be rejected out of hand as all through the ancient texts reference is
made to the breath of god. From Isaiah 42:5: This is what God the LORD says-- the
Creator of the heavens, who stretches them out, who spreads out the Earth with all that
springs from it, who gives breath to its people, and life to those who walk on it. This, to me,
sounds like the all-pervasive energy field of life.
One such atom we need to investigate is Caesium 133 that is widely used in accurate timing
devices. What we call one second here on Earth is defined as:
1 second = 9,192, 631,770 cycles (frequency) of the standard Caesium 133 atom.
The accuracy of any atomic clock depends on temperature and frequency. Since the
Universe, according to physicists, is made up of atoms we can assume other planetary
objects will have common atoms as here on Earth. With this in mind lets perform a mental
experiment that we will put to the Einsteinium test later. I want you to imagine 3 Earth like
planets, each separated by exactly 1 light year from Earth, each planet possessing identical
densities, temperature ranges and gravity measurements; in order to eliminate accuracy
variations when running the 3 identical caesium 133 based clocks. One light year is a
distance measurement equalling the speed of light,186,300 miles per second, multiplied by
the time elapsed for one Earth year; which is roughly 365.25 days x 24 hours per day x 60
minutes per hour x 60 seconds per minute = 31,557,600 seconds. We next need to find a
way to synchronise the start of the clocks either using quantum entanglement or God.
Assume all clocks are started simultaneously.
Each clock will tick off seconds identically on each planet because similar temperatures
ensure the same vibration frequencies operate in each of the 3 caesium 133 atomic clocks.
After many Earth years pass each clock will show the same number of elapsed seconds
since their start. Unless you exist everywhere you cannot see simultaneously all 3 clocks,
but faith in God can. God confirms the clocks displays are exactly the same. Now, this is
good, else uncertainty exists at the atomic level throughout the universe but we know no
such uncertainty exists.
Physicists need to make measurements and therefore reject all godly help. They devise an
onboard experiment that lights up the clock display in order that each clock display will be
transmitted through space and read here on Earth. Einsteinium physics tell us light travels
at a constant speed throughout the vacuum of space, if there is a vacuum, as many
physicists believe space is 99.99...% plasma! This means each displayed clock face will
take 1 light year to reach Earth. When the off world clock display reaches Earth it displays 0
then 1, 2, 3 ... synchronised with each second passed by here on Earth. However, the Earth
based clock has been running for 1 Earth year displaying 31,557,600 seconds elapsed since
the start of the experiment. The physicist being a smart chap knows the display inaccuracy
is due to the time taken for the speed of light to reach Earth and adds 31,557,600 to each
transmitted clock display and confirms the three clock displays all agree. Noting the off
world clock displays are ticking seconds identical to the Earth clock proves the caesium 133
clocks run identically on all three planets.
If you were a physicist on one of the other Earth like planets and performed the same
experiment you would also see Earths clock display running 31,557,600 seconds behind
your clock. Being a smart chap you also adjust the elapsed time for one Earth year in
seconds to compensate for the discrepancy in clock displays due to the speed of light.

9
Isaac Newton proposed time ticked the same throughout the Universe until Albert Einstein
entered the scene with his stolen Special and General theories of relativity. Research into
many of Einsteins claims clearly proves beyond all doubt that the scientists Lorentz,
FitzGerald, Maxwell, Larmor, Poincar, Hasenhrl, Hertz, Riemann and Grossmann some of
whom had published physics papers in the late 1880s; these became the scientific basis for
ALL of Einsteins plagiarised works into Special and General relatively, published in 1905
and 1915 respectively!
Einstein plagiarised because he never gave citations for the research he published that was
clearly stolen from the publications from the list of scientists cited above.
We now investigate, using relativity physics, what happens to the clocks accuracy when we
install a caesium 133 based clock onboard a spaceship travelling at half light speed away
from Earth. Again, we use onboard light to display the clock face on the spaceship as it
blasts into space. We will use the FitzGerald Lorentz equation, from Einsteins stolen theory
of relativity which takes the form:
t = t x square root (1- v2/c2)
Since our spaceship is travelling at half the speed of light we get v = c/2. Plugging this into t
= t x square root (1- v2/c2) we get t = t x square root (1- (c/2)2/c2) which results in t = 0.866t.
Einsteinium physics states nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. However, all
electromagnetic energies and visible light which is part of that spectrum of frequencies can
and does travel at the fixed speed of light.
Now, if v = c, that is the clocks display is travelling away from Earth at the speed of light, we
get: t = t x square root (1-1) = t x 0 = 0. This means we on Earth never see the clock display
of the onboard caesium clock. Physicists have explicitly told the world ONLY
electromagnetic energy waves can travel at the speed of light so we have a problem with the
experiment when using mathematically based relativity physics. We know from our earlier
experiment that one of the answers MUST be incorrect, either light maintains its speed or
the new mathematics of relatively physics is wrong. Lets not forget the proposal by John
Moffat that light has a variable speed which is in total disagreement with relativity physics!
Lets suppose some cosmic energy can exceed the speed of light by a factor of 2, just for the
convenience of using Einsteins equations. Here is the equation:
t = t x square root (1- v2/c2). We substitute v = 2c and get t = t x square root (1- 4c2/c2).
Giving t = t x square root (1- 4). But what is the square root (1- 4) or square root (-3)? If
you enter -3 into your calculator and press the square root button it will inform you the
calculation is in error, unless your calculator can perform complex arithmetic.
Based on this evidence the scientific community must assume the Einstein Relativity
equations have been deliberately constructed (in theory) to ensure nothing can travel faster
than the speed of light! That is why back in 2011 the speed of the neutrinos they measured
was in error. The experimenters have since stated they made a mistake in the setup of the
experiment! They had to say this for how else could they explain something that breaks
Einsteins stolen theoretical physics? How absolutely convenient for the powers that be else
face a contradiction in physics that has lasted over a century. Constructing equations that
puts all reality in a box is how the elitists brainwash mankind into accepting their truths.

10
Quote: Nikola Tesla regarded Relativity as the greatest historical aberration of scientific
thought. Relativity is no more than a philosophical standpoint, a virus to infect a "New Age".
From the standpoint of Tesla Einsteins Relativity is "Bravo-Sierra" (Bull Shit!) However, it
has sunk its roots into the basic consideration of Inductance (L) and Capacitance (C). L and
C represent coefficients of aetheric processes, and as such represent the aether, not
Relativity. Albert Einstein stands in the way of Michael Faraday, and the Pharisees are now
the Physicists (Eric Dollard).
Yet, this unsound illogical subject is taught as fact in physics degrees in all universities
around the world. Time to wake up and learn the truths not the lies the educational systems
teach.
Common sense is a good tool to have in the tool box so lets use this tool and reject all
mathematical physics, however elegant they may look, if they do not represent creation as
we understand the physical world we live in. To reinforce common sense consider the
mathematical modelling used in aerodynamics theory that was applied to the flight
capabilities of the bumblebee. The model concluded the bumblebee cant fly because their
little wings cannot generate enough uplift force to keep the insect in the air. Someone
should tell the bumblebees!
All models are a simplified version of the real thing. Take for example a model railway. As
fun as it is to play with such models they never experience adverse weather conditions like
tsunamis, flooding, tornados and freezing conditions that freeze points together causing
serious accidents. Mathematical modelling is a pure science that does not include all the
real world unpredictable events such as above. You know from experience the number of
times the weathermans mathematical models have failed, all over the world, because they
do not model all the variable forces correctly. All such models can only provide an idealised
version of the real world we live in. We must therefore recognise all simplified models as
that and nothing more. If we could model all world events accurately we could predict
Tsunamis, where and when volcanoes erupt and under what conditions aeroplanes fall out
of the sky but we cannot. Many theoretical physicists put too much faith in their modelling
techniques only to experience failure when their predictions are compared to their real world
counterparts. The reader should always bear in mind the limitations of a mathematical
model are due to the assumptions made at the start of the modelling processes.
In the study of theoretical mechanics many assumptions are made such as using a point
sized particle to model a cannon ball in flight. We do this because a real cannon ball has a
shape that will be affected by air resistance when in flight. Also wind will generate
unforeseen forces and high ground temperatures will cause upward thermal forces
generating unwanted forces on the ball bringing the idealised mathematical model into
question. Most people would agree the cannon balls flight path would not be seriously
affected by such forces due to its weight here on Earth; but what if we were modelling the
flight path of a ping pong ball? Hot upward rising air thermals, sideways wind, air resistance,
spin and rainfall will seriously affect the motion of the ping pong ball. The study of very tiny
particles may as well be the study of tiny ping pong balls because the unwanted energies
like wind and temperature are huge and will seriously impact theoretical flight paths. If the
mathematical model just misses one force, no matter how small, its results will differ from the
real world it is attempting to simulate. You have read from earlier examples all mathematical
models are at best an approximation and will never replace experimentation in the real
world.
Mathematics is based upon a group of axioms that date back thousands of years. Those
who have studied Euclidean geometry will remember axioms and postulates that attempt to
formalise truths in mathematical reasoning. Because the English language is not precise
many interpretations of axiomatic set theory differ from each other creating doubts even

11
about the meaning of equality for instance. Many great mathematicians over the centuries
have tried to carve in stone the precise nature of axiomatic set theory, the underpinning and
unarguable set of rules, for the existence of all mathematical operations but all have failed.
Imre Lakatos was a Hungarian philosopher of mathematics and science who talked about
mathematical induction and stated: It is intriguing how mathematical logicians who are so
squeamish about rigor, and who set out to achieve absolute certainty, can slip into the
morass of inductivism. For instance, A. Fraenkel, the distinguished logician, dares to state
that some axioms of logic receive their full weight from the evidence of their
consequences. Lakatos later stated: Why not honestly admit mathematical fallibility, and try
to defend the dignity of fallible knowledge from cynical scepticism, rather than delude
ourselves that we shall be able to mend invisibly the latest tear in the fabric of our ultimate
intuitions?
Even the great mathematicians, philosophers and logicians cannot agree upon the
theoretical foundations that act as the indisputable support structures for all of mathematics.
These differences alone should put doubt into extending mathematics into modelling the real
world with even greater fanciful equations.
We all take for granted our number systems are perfect, but are they? We also think we
know what a straight line is, but do we? As a simple exercise in providing a proof I want you
to think like a mathematical logician and describe unambiguously what constitutes a
definition for a straight line. In attempting this we need to be wary of any assumptions that
form part of any support structures. Here is my first attempt: A straight line joins two
endpoints with a continuous line that never bends. This definition assumes

We can define the exact positions of the endpoints

All people agree upon what we mean by continuous
What the word bend means

The only way we can define the precise location of the endpoints is to use a coordinate
system that can describe all points as individual locators. So, right away I have used a
coordinate system as a support structure within my definition. Is this a rigorous and
acceptable construct that we can depend upon? Continuous means without gaps or breaks.
This assumes gaps and breaks have already been defined and we are happy to use their
definitions. To bend means to deviate from a straight line BUT we are still trying to define
what constitutes a definition for a straight line; this is a recursive error.
If we draw a straight line with a pencil then inspect it under a microscope the line displays
blobs of carbon unevenly deposited due to the varying pressure applied in the drawing
process. Because this line appears bumpy along its edges it intuitively breaks the desired
straight line definition so we shall have to invent an idealised line that is without thickness.
This definition is rapidly becoming a belief in faith as a line with no thickness is invisible;
hence no line at all.
Most people reading this will imagine a line drawn against the edge of a rule on a perfectly
flat piece of paper existing in two dimensions, as on a drawing board. The convenience of
using a local perfectly flat sheet of paper is that I can choose an origin x=0, y=0 then quote
the endpoints relative to the origin. Note this definition relies upon a definition of what
perfectly flat means.
What if the straight line represents a distance measurement between two planets in our solar
system? We are now off the drawing board and into 3 dimensions. Where is the origin x=0,
y=0 and z=0 reference point now? I guess we could use Earth as the origin, say the ground

12
dead centre of England (?), and then mark off equal distances until we reach the other
planet. Again we are faced with assumptions like:

What defines an equal distance in the real world when temperature variations cause
expansion and contraction in all materials, especially metal rules?
What measurement units should we use and have they been rigorously defined?
Where on the remote planet do we use as the other endpoint?
Are the number systems in use appropriate and been previously rigorously defined?

Because of such difficulties man invented many mathematical definitions such as the
original definition of one yard as: Invented by Henry I of England as being the distance
between the tip of his nose and the end of his thumb. Such a definition is erroneous is the
arm straight, where is the tip of his nose, where is the end of his thumb?
The definition for the length of the meter also has a history of its own. The original definition
of one meter dates back to the 18th century where two independently standards suggested:
1. The meter is the length of a pendulum having a half-period of one second.
2. The meter is one ten-millionth of the length of the earth's meridian along a quadrant
of the earth.
The dispute was eventually settled when the French Academy of Sciences chose the
meridian definition over the pendulum definition because the force of gravity varies slightly
over the surface of the Earth thereby affecting the time accuracy for the swing of the
pendulum. Today the definition is given as: The meter is the length of the path travelled by
light in a vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second. BUT even this
definition assumes we know and accept the definition of a vacuum and that we can define a
straight line needing two endpoints!
A circle is a continuously curved line that once drawn has no beginning and no end,
meaning you can traverse a circle forever in search of its starting point. A circle has a finite
length, its circumference, trapped between the accuracies of an upper and lower bound
measurement system but interestingly has an infinite number of starting points. If we attempt
to create a circle with circumference of 1cm using point sized dots how many do we need?
As there are an infinite number of starting points the dot size = 1/infinity. This calculation is
sloppy because infinity is not a number it is a concept. Trying again we note 1/very large
number = very small number, so 1/extremely large number = extremely small number.
Continuing this logical argument we say, mathematically, 1/n approaches zero as n
approaches infinity. This implies the dot size approaches zero as the number of dots
increase. Just like the straight line definition has no thickness so does the dot. Yet we can
see both a straight line and a dot. Maybe our maths is built on shaky foundations when we
talk about infinitesimals?
Trying to remove such imprecise definitions has proved difficult and continues to be a logical
challenge as to imparting the truth. I hope you can appreciate why so many mathematicians
wrote volumes in the hope of defining unambiguously all of the mathematical foundations.
Unfortunately there are still logical inconsistencies that challenge the accepted set theory
axiomatic approach to number theory.
Because the underlying mathematical structures contain logical inaccuracies can you really
put faith in mathematical modelling predictions used by theoretical physicists?
Theory is based upon exactness in idealised representations which require undeniable truths
in their support structures. In all practical examples like building structures good enough is
adequate because we dont expect building structures to last forever; but good enough is
not acceptable in idealised mathematical modelling of the real world..

13
Derek Abbott, Professor of Electrical and Electronics Engineering at The University of
Adelaide in Australia has said: Math is just a mental construct. It is just an approximation of
reality that has its frailties and limitations and that will break down at some point because
perfect mathematical forms do not exist in the physical universe.
The great engineer and inventor Nikola Tesla wrote: Today's scientists have substituted
mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and
eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality:
Now cometh the challenge that all modern theoretical physicists dread: all that is modern
mathematical physics is a lie to creation as we experience it! There was no Big Bang
because the mind experiment we just conducted could never have happened. There is no
start to time, there is no end to time, and there is only what you experience and nothing else.
You are immortal; that is you the eternal spirit currently existing in your physical body needs
to find eternal balance between good and evil, else face eternal rebirth within a new physical
body until you have learned your lesson. Mathematics is no substitute for experiencing the
real world, no matter how good a mathematician you are.
You were created to exist as a physical being here on Earth to find balance between good
and evil. The light forces of good need you to work with them because right now the dark
forces of evil are controlling all events that are happening not just here on Earth but on
trillions of Earth like planets throughout this galaxy and other galaxies. Most Satanists
believe Satan is the good force implying Jesus and his light forces are the evil ones; but
remember evil has stood for many thousands of Earth years where cruelty and crimes
against humanity have been horrific. You will know evil from good by the actions taken by
your world leaders, not by listening to their words of lies! YOU too will be measured by your
actions towards your fellow man; not by your promises. From the Latin Facta non Verba
meaning Deeds not Words. Crimes against humanity are on the rise and are orchestrated by
the evil controllers of this world; you need to wake up!
Time, as we experience it, is the creation of the dark and evil forces that will dominate the
future of all imprisoned spirits here on Earth. It is your mission to destroy this illusion and in
so doing free creation to prepare for new eternal energies of physicality. You know what is
real, what is pain, what is pleasure and you know this without the confusing lies of the dark
controlling forces.
I can guess the question buzzing in the heads of the technocrats that have studied and
worked in physics for half their lives is: This guy must be wrong else I have wasted half my
life believing in Einsteinium physics? Maybe you have but all is not lost because your
awakening is the most important event in your life.
Remember the phrases, man will never fly and man will never exceed the speed of sound?
Both forecasts have since been proved wrong, not in theory but by experimentation. In the
early 1890s Nikola Tesla published results from his practical experiments proving his
experimental radio transmissions travelled at 475,000 km/s which is 1.58 times the speed of
light! Tesla went on to prove there are speeds in the cosmos that exceed the speed of light
by a factor of 50!
Both Tesla and Einstein cannot be right. Tesla, probably the greatest engineer and inventor
in the 19th and 20th centuries had to this day more patents to his name than any other
person. The world is in debt to Teslas engineering genius to this today. However,
academia the world over teaches and portrays Tesla as second rate to Albert Einstein. To
prop up their assertions they also falsely stated Tesla was mad! I suggest the Worlds real
controllers created and financially backed Einsteins stolen science to keep you in the dark

14
thereby making it easier to control all intelligent life here on Earth. More to say on this in the
published booklet: The economic bubble.
Is the thought of limiting human achievement something you feel comfortable with? Of
course not, and the creator of all things would be disappointed if you simply settled to accept
the beliefs of experts unless you challenged for yourself as to the discovery of their claims
were reasonable - agreed? As we have seen there is no scientific definition that is a
universal truth hence no man on Earth can proclaim anything is absolute yet many do and
trust in common sense tells us otherwise.
Motto: Trust your senses for they were architected to work alongside physical creation.
What committee decides the facts to be taught in all the educational systems worldwide
because most are now in dispute or simply downright lies? Answer: The controlling elitists
running planet Earth. Only by awakening will you see truths above all the ridiculous facts
you are asked to believe, memorise and regurgitate.
Learning formal educational facts is like building the house of playing cards as the eventual
outcome is a collapse of trust because we are being asked to believe in lies. Wake up from
your slumber and take your place as a universal being and complete the missions and
promises you swore contractually to undertake before becoming a physical being here on
Earth.
There is no religion higher than truth: Theosophical Society.
There is no education higher than truth: Ernie Venn.
Can you now smell the coffee or are you in need of cataract surgery?

Ernie Venn