Lecture15 TheNuclearEnergy
Lecture15 TheNuclearEnergy
Lecture15 TheNuclearEnergy
Page 1 of 5
Lecture 15
Page 2 of 5
Figure 15.1: (a) Typical Nuclear Power Plant, (b) Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) Power Plant (Source IAEA)
Figure 15.2: (a) Total Number of Nuclear Reactors in World, (b) Countries Nuclear Share in Electricity (Source IAEA)
Page 3 of 5
Lecture 15
Figure 15.3: Pakistan Total Electricity Production and its Nuclear Share in Electricity (Source IAEA)
Chemistry Analogy
Chemical Process
C + O2
CO2
Page 4 of 5
Lecture 15
"up" quark) which is two-thirds (2/3) as large as that on a proton, and the
other two each carry a negative electrical charge (the "down" quarks) each
equal to -1/3 times the charge on the electron. The neutron is so-called
because it is electrically neutral, with a total electric charge of: 2/3 -1/3 -1/3 =
0.
Particle
neutron
proton
Symbol
n
p
Quark Composition
up, down, down
up, up, down
Electrical Charge
- 1/3 - 1/3 + 2/3 = 0
- 1/3 + 2/3 + 2/3 = 1
There is a close relationship between the neutron and the nucleus of the
ordinary hydrogen atom, the proton (symbol = p). The neutron has a mass
slightly larger than that of the proton, and subject to the famous formula E =
mc2, it converts to a proton when one of the "down" quarks emits an electron
to carry away one negative charge and become an "up" quark. (In the
process an extremely low mass and difficult to detect particle, a type of
"neutrino," is emitted to balance the spin of the particles in the reaction.) The
net result is the following radioactive decay of the neutron:
Quarks have the interesting property of pulling on each other harder and
harder as they are moved farther apart. As a result, one of the quarks in a
proton can only be separated from the others when it is replaced by another
quark. For example, if a proton and neutron are put next to each other, they
can exchange either an "up" or "down" quark. This process helps bind the
neutron and proton together in a stable nucleus appropriately called
deuterium (symbol = d).
Deuterium nuclei are about twice as heavy as protons, so when they replace
protons in ordinary water the result is called "heavy water." A deuterium
nucleus can also react with a neutron to form tritium (symbol = t), However,
deuterium does not absorb neutrons nearly as well as protons do. This is why
deuterium is used in place of protons in so-called heavy water for certain
types of nuclear reactors where neutron absorption needs to be minimized.
The neutron in tritium is also much less stable against the type of radioactive
decay mentioned above than it is in the stable deuterium nucleus; tritium has
a "half life" of only 12.3 years.
Tritium is one of the reactants in the fusion reaction that requires the lowest
energy in the reactants to overcome the electrostatic repulsion between the
nuclei. An important feature of this reaction is the high energy of the neutron
released:
To make this occur within a terrestrially useful time requires a temperature in
excess of c. 57 million degrees Celsius, where each hydrogen nucleus and
accompanying electron typically has as much energy as if it had moved
through a voltage of 5000 volts. (In this case we say the temperature is 5
keV, where keV stands for "kilo-electron-volts.") This reaction yields more
Lecture 15
Page 5 of 5
energy per unit mass than any other nuclear reaction because the pair of
protons and the pair of neutrons in the resulting helium-4 nucleus are packed
together in a way that maximizes the change in binding energy per quark.
The neutrons released in such reactions each have the huge energy of 14,000
keV (i.e. 14 MeV). This leads to much more material damage per unit energy
release in practicable fusion compared to fission, where neutrons typically
have energies between one and two MeV. However, the high energy of such
fusion neutrons makes them very useful for increasing the yield of nuclear
weapons.
There are only a few methods for producing temperatures exceeding 5 keV
(57 million degrees). Three basic laboratory methods (and their
disadvantages for nuclear weapons) are:
1. Magnetic bottles (huge and expensive. $10 billion)
2. Laser compression of frozen deuterium-tritium mixtures (huge and still
multi-billion $)
3. Compression using exploding wires (may not work, and needs large
power supplies)
While there has been speculation that some such scheme might allow making
at least a nuclear land mine, there is no plausible reason to expect that this
would be competitive with the simple expedient of using a fission bomb to
produce the needed temperatures. Thus, controlled fusion experiments are
only indirectly relevant to the production of nuclear weapons. Their main role
in weapons programs is to allow continued exploration of the physics of high
temperature plasmas in the absence of nuclear testing, and to maintain a
cadre of scientists and engineers trained in some of the technologies relevant
to nuclear weapons design.
Of these laboratory methods, only a certain kind of magnetic bottle called the
tokamak (a Russian acronym for toroidal magnetic chamber) fairly clearly has
a potential for net energy production, albeit at a very high cost per unit
energy produced. The other two approaches are funded primarily through
weapons and/or exploratory research programs.
Average Binding Energy per Nucleon
The curve reaches a maximum near A=60 and
drops significantly by A=235. The drop between
A=120 and A=235 provides a measure of energy
release in fission. The energy release in fusion is
related to the steeply rising left proton of this
curve. As can be seen, the iron group is the most
tightly bound with 8.8 MeV per nucleon binding
energy. The lighter elements are more amenable
for nuclear fusion, while elements heavier than
iron can yield energy by fission.
Figure 15.3: Average Binding Energy per Nucleon