Policy Brief 2 Community Oversight of Police
Policy Brief 2 Community Oversight of Police
Policy Brief 2 Community Oversight of Police
Context
On March 24, 2012, Pasadena police officers Jeffrey Newlen and Mathew Griffin shot and killed
19-year old Kendrec McDade, an unarmed college student, while responding to a reported
armed robbery. They chased Kendrec for several blocks then fired 7 shots at him, claiming to be
acting in self-defense after being charged at. The Pasadena Police Department investigated
their fellow officers, finding that the officers did not warn Kendrec before shooting him and
then left him on the street critically wounded and twitching without first aid. Both officers
involved in the shooting were cleared of wrongdoing by the police department and the District
Attorney. They continue to serve as Pasadena police officers.
Problem Statement
When police officers brutalize members of the community, its usually left up to their fellow
officers to investigate and decide what, if any, consequences they should face. As a
consequence, nationwide less than 1 in every 12 complaints of police misconduct results in
some kind of disciplinary action against the officer(s) responsible. In some places, police
departments dismiss 99% of all excessive force complaints against officers. Communities need a
meaningful way to determine how police officers and police departments interact with
them. And when the police fail to live up to these expectations, communities need a meaningful
way to ensure they are held accountable.
Policy Overview
Cities should establish an independent Office of Civilian Complaints (OCC) with the resources
and authority to investigate all civilian complaints of police misconduct and make discipline and
policy recommendations to the Chief of Police. Additionally, cities should establish a civilian
Police Commission to oversee the OCC and Police Department with the authority to set
department policy, fire the Police Chief and impose discipline on officers.
The Police Commission should:
Decide policy for the police department.
Discipline and dismiss police officers.
Hold public disciplinary hearings.
Select the candidates for Police Chief, to be hired by the Mayor.
Evaluate and fire the Police Chief, if needed.
Receive full-time, competitive salaries for all members.
Receive regular training on policing and civil rights.
Not have current, former or family of police officers as members.
Have its members selected from candidates offered by community organizations.
Last revised 1.29.15. For more information, please contact @deray or @samswey
such a policy may only be possible through a ballot initiative to add this system to the
city charter, like has been done in San Francisco.
Other laws can limit civilian oversight, such as the California Police Officer Bill of Rights
which prevents police disciplinary hearings from being open to the public.
Police may view a strong oversight system with suspicion and resist its mandates,
causing delays in accessing police records and information needed for investigations.
Its expensive to hire quality investigators and policy analysts.
Its rare for investigators to find enough evidence to prove an officer committed
wrongdoing.
As such, this policy will work best when advanced in combination with other reforms such as
a police body and dashboard camera program in cities where the Chief of Police is either
unwilling or unable to use his existing authority to make changes demanded by the community.
Learn More
About different kinds of civilian oversight: http://bit.ly/1KXjaho, http://bit.ly/1BaoSHd
How to make civilian oversight more accessible: http://nydn.us/1ykytLF
How effective civilian oversight is: http://bit.ly/1AFHhcn, http://bit.ly/15pSPsj
How civilian oversight works in San Francisco: http://bit.ly/1ujYC8e
Last revised 1.29.15. For more information, please contact @deray or @samswey