Axioms For The Real Numbers Math 200
Axioms For The Real Numbers Math 200
Axioms For The Real Numbers Math 200
Field Axioms: there exist notions of addition and multiplication, and additive and
multiplicative
identities and inverses, so that:
(P1) (Associative law for addition): a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c
(P2) (Existence of additive identity): 9 0 : a + 0 = 0 + a = a
(P3) (Existence of additive inverse): a + (a) = (a) + a = 0
(P4) (Commutative law for addition): a + b = b + a
(P5) (Associative law for multiplication): a (b c) = (a b) c
(P6) (Existence of multiplicative identity): 9 1 6= 0 : a 1 = 1 a = a
(P7) (Existence of multiplicative inverse): a a1 = a1 a = 1 for a 6= 0
(P8) (Commutative law for multiplication): a b = b a
(P9) (Distributive law): a (b + c) = a b + a c
Order Axioms: there exists a subset of positive numbers P such that
(P10) (Trichotomy): exclusively either a 2 P or a 2 P or a = 0.
(P11) (Closure under addition): a, b 2 P ) a + b 2 P
(P12) (Closure under multiplication): a, b 2 P ) a b 2 P
Completeness Axiom: a least upper bound of a set A is a number x such that x _ y for all
y 2 A, and such that if z is also an upper bound for A, then necessarily z _ x.
(P13) (Existence of least upper bounds): Every nonempty set A of real numbers which is
bounded above has a least upper bound.
We will call properties (P1)(P12), and anything that follows from them, elementary
arithmetic. These properties imply, for example, that the real numbers contain the rational
numbers as a subfield, and basic properties about the behavior of > and < under
multiplication and addition.
Adding property (P13) uniquely determines the real numbers. The standard way of proving
this is to identify each x 2 R with the subset of rational numbers y 2 Q such that y _ x,
referred to as a Dedekind cut. This procedure can also be used to construct the real numbers
from the rationals.
1
2(x + y) = 2x + 2y .
There are no numbers between 1 and 2.
Addition
Multiplication
Commutative
Commutative
a+b=b+a
ab = ba
Associative
Associative
a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c
(ab)c = a(bc)
Identity
Identity
a+0=a
a1=a
Additive Inverse
(Opposite)
For every real number a there
exist a real number, denoted
(a), such that
Multiplicative Inverse
(Reciprocal)
For every real number a
except 0 there exist a real
number, denoted
, such that
a + (a) = 0
a
=1
Distributive Law
For all real a, b, c
a(b + c) = ab + ac, and (a + b)c = ac + bc
The commutative and associative laws do not hold for subtraction or division:
a b is not equal to b a
a b is not equal to b a
a (b c) is not equal to (a b) c
a (b c) is not equal to (a b) c
Try some examples with numbers and you will see that they do not work.
What these laws mean is that order and grouping don't matter for addition and multiplication, but
they certainly do matter for subtraction and division. In this way, addition and multiplication are
cleaner than subtraction and division. This will become important when we start talking about
algebraic expressions. Often what we will want to do with an algebraic expression will involve
rearranging it somehow. If the operations are all addition and multiplication, we don't have to
worry so much that we might be changing the value of an expression by rearranging its terms or
factors. Fortunately, we can always think of subtraction as an addition problem (adding the
opposite), and we can always think of division as a multiplication (multiplying by the
reciprocal).
You may have noticed that the commutative and associative laws read exactly the same way for
addition and multiplication, as if there was no difference between them other than notation. The
law that makes them behave differently is the distributive law, because multiplication distributes
over addition, not vice-versa.. The distributive law is extremely important, and it is impossible to
understand algebra without being thoroughly familiar with this law.
Example: 2(3 + 4)
According to the order of operations rules, we should evaluate this expression by first doing the
addition inside the parentheses, giving us
2(3 + 4) = 2(7) = 14
But we can also look at this problem with the distributive law, and of course still get the same
answer. The distributive law says that
The numbers used to measure real-world quantities such as length, area, volume, speed, electrical charges,
probability of rain, room temperature, gross national products, growth rates, and so forth, are called real
numbers. They include such number as
,
,
, ,
,
,
,
and .
The basic algebraic properties of the real numbers can be expressed in terms of the two fundamental
operations of addition and multiplication.
and
(b)
and
We call
, such
that
(b) For each real number
of , such that
Although the additive inverse of
because
, namely
is assumed to exist if
, then
. Notice
is also called the
Example:
State one basic algebraic property of the real numbers to justify each statement:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g) If
, then
Solution:
(a) Commutative Property for addition
(b) Associative Property for addition
(c) Commutative Property for multiplication
(d) Distributive Property
(e) Additive Inverse Property
(f) Multiplicative Identity Property
(g) Multiplicative Inverse Property
Many of the important properties of the real numbers can be derived as results of the basic properties,
although we shall not do so here. Among the more important derived properties are the following.
then,
and
, then
, then
or
(or both)
and
be real numbers,
is defined by
or
is defined only if
. If
, then by definition
and denominator
. Although the denominator cant be zero, theres nothing wrong with having a zero in the numerator. In
fact, if
,
(9) The Negative of a Fraction:
If
, then