Scribd
Upload
394 views

Script General Evaluator and Checklist

This document provides scripts and checklists for the general evaluator role in a Toastmasters meeting. The script guides the general evaluator to introduce and thank each speech evaluator. It also includes handing control back to the toastmaster at the end. The checklist helps the general evaluator evaluate aspects of the full meeting run by the presiding officer, toastmaster, table topics master, and participants. It focuses on timekeeping, guest involvement, role explanations, and speech/evaluator techniques.

Uploaded by

sahanchem
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
394 views

Script General Evaluator and Checklist

This document provides scripts and checklists for the general evaluator role in a Toastmasters meeting. The script guides the general evaluator to introduce and thank each speech evaluator. It also includes handing control back to the toastmaster at the end. The checklist helps the general evaluator evaluate aspects of the full meeting run by the presiding officer, toastmaster, table topics master, and participants. It focuses on timekeeping, guest involvement, role explanations, and speech/evaluator techniques.

Uploaded by

sahanchem
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Redmond2828 Toastmasters

http://redmond2828.org
[email protected]

Script for General Evaluator


[Go to the lectern; shake hands with the Toastmaster]

Mr./Madam Toastmaster, Fellow Toastmasters, and welcome Guests!

This is the evaluation portion of our meeting. First, we will hear Speech Evaluators give evaluations of
todays prepared speeches. Then, I will give my general evaluation of the overall meeting.

Each Speech Evaluator will speak for 2 to 3 minutes.

Our first evaluator is __________, evaluating __________s speech, ___________________________.


Please help me welcome ___________. [Lead applause until Evaluator takes the lectern.]

Our second evaluator is __________, evaluating __________s speech, ________________________.


Please help me welcome ___________. [Lead applause until Evaluator takes the lectern.]

Our third evaluator is __________, evaluating __________s speech, _________________________.


Please help me welcome ___________. [Lead applause until Evaluator takes the lectern.]

Our fourth evaluator is __________, evaluating __________s speech, ________________________.


Please help me welcome ___________. [Lead applause until Evaluator takes the lectern.]

Now I return the meeting control to Mister/Madam Toastmaster.

[Shake hands with the Toastmaster; go back to your seat]

Redmond2828 Toastmasters
http://redmond2828.org
[email protected]

Checklist for General Evaluator


A. Sergent-at-Arms
 Was the room prepared? (flag displayed, gavel ready, timer equipment, ribbons, etc.)
B. Presiding Officer
 Did the meeting start on time?
 Were the guests welcomed?
C. Toastmaster
 Was introduction of the meeting theme brief and clear?
 Were the meeting roles explained (timer, grammarian, wizard of ahs, camera operator)?
 Did the speech introductions include...
 a brief biographical sketch?
 the objectives of the speech?
 the speech title and minutes?
 Did the TM lead applause and not leave the lectern "naked"?
 Did the segues between speeches show that the Toastmaster was listening?
 Will the meeting end on time?
D. Table Topics Master
 Did TT Master introduce the Table Topics purposes and the time limits?
 Were the topics appropriate?
 Were any special techniques (e.g., props, gestures) employed?
 Were members called on in the appropriate order (those with no role, then smaller
roles, then larger roles)?
 Were guests invited to participate?
E. Table Topics Participants
 How has each speaker improved?
 Were any special techniques (rephrase, artful dodge) used?
 What, in terms of the mechanics of impromptu speaking, can be improved?
F. Evaluators
 Was the book report summary avoided?
 Was the 'sandwich' technique employed:
 Did it begin on a positive note?
 Was at least one suggestion for improvement made?
 Were more than 3 suggestions made?
 Was encouragement added at the close?

You might also like