Untitled
Untitled
CONTENTS
Introduction
Purpose
Rural Village Character
Mix of Land Uses
Connections and Street Character
Open Spaces
5
5
6
9
9
Plan Framework
10
Overview 10
Study Area Boundary
10
History 12
Development Patterns 12
Notable Architecture 14
Outreach Approach and Process
16
Vision, Characteristics and Implementation
16
Rural Village Precedents 17
Cultural Neighborhood Recommendations
32
Planning and Land Use
32
Buildings 33
Connections 33
Open Space 33
Specific Property Recommendations 34
Area-wide Recommendations 36
Historic Preservation 36
Environment 37
Transportation 38
Trail Connections 49
Parks and Open Space Concepts
50
Community Facilities 50
Implementation
53
Zoning 53
Plan Recommendations
18
Retain R-200 and Majority of the
R-60 Zoning
53
Sandy Spring Rural Village Concept
18
Retain RE-1, RE-2 and RC Zoning
53
Village Core Neighborhood Recommendations
20
Zoning Text Amendment for Cultural
Planning and Land Use
20
Institutions in the RC Zone
53
Buildings 21
CRN Zone 56
Connections 22
Why the CRN Zone? 56
Open Space 24
Removal of the Overlay Zone
57
Specific Property Recommendations 25
Design Checklist 58
Residential Neighborhood Recommendations
29
Buildings 58
Planning and Land Use
29
Connections 59
Buildings 30 Open Space 59
Connections 30
Sewer and Water 60
Open Space 30
Capital Improvements Program 60
Specific Property Recommendations 30
Maps
Sandy Spring within Montgomery County Map
4
Existing Land Use Map
6
Sandy Spring/Ashton Map 10
Sandy Spring Rural Village Map
11
Sandy Spring Post Office and Vicinity
(1879 G.M. Hopkins Atlas)
13
Village Core Neighborhood Properties Map
25
Residential Neighborhood Properties Map
31
Cultural Neighborhood Properties Map
34
Historic Context Map 37
Roadway Classifications Map 41
Bentley Road Map 45
Meeting House Road Map
47
Bicycle Classifications Map 48
Regional Connections Map 51
Existing Zoning Map Prior to October 30, 2014
54
Proposed Zoning Map 55
Illustrations
Sandy Spring Rural Village Concept
19
Village Core Neighborhood 20
Conceptual Aerial View of the Village Core
21
Conceptual Streetscape Perspective of the Village Core
Looking West
23
Conceptual Aerial View of MD 108 Looking East
24
One Property Redevelops 26
Three Properties Redevelop 27
All Properties Redevelop 27
Residential Neighborhood 29
Cultural Neighborhood 32
Proposed Street Section for MD 108
41
Existing Olney Sandy Spring Road (MD 108)
42
Proposed Concept for Olney Sandy Spring Road (MD 108) 43
Proposed Village Green Concept 50
Proposed Townhouse Setback 50
MD 108 Build-to-Area 58
Tables
Existing Zoning within the Sandy Spring Rural Village
prior to October 30, 2014
7
Household Growth 1990-2011
8
Population Estimates 2010 11
Development Potential 39
Road Classifications 40
Bicycle Classifications 49
Comparison of the Sandy Spring/Ashton
Overlay Zone with the CRN Zone
57
INTRODUCTION
Purpose
In Spring 2013, the Montgomery County Council
requested that the Planning Department examine
a limited amendment to update the 1998 Sandy
Spring/Ashton Master Plan. The 1998 Master
Plan recognized the Sandy Spring village center
as the heart of the community in terms of local
commerce and community gatherings (page 32).
The Plan also acknowledged the well-established
character of the village center on the south side of
Olney Sandy Spring Road (MD 108) and the need
to reinforce the village center on the north side. The
1998 Plan (page 34) required that a more detailed
study be conducted to address the following:
Rural Village Character: Establish a scale that
provides an appropriate transition to adjacent
low density residential neighborhoods and
buildings in keeping with historic character of
the area,
Mix of Land Uses: Consists of one- to threestory buildings with commercial uses that serve
the community,
Connections and Street Character: Provide
pedestrian and vehicular improvements and
address street character, and
Open Space: Create a quality open space in the
village center that provides opportunities for
gathering.
Introduction
Existing Zoning within the Sandy Spring Rural Village prior to October 30, 2014
Single-Use
Zone1
Description
Acres
Limitations
Zoning
Residential
Allowed
C-1
General Commercial
6.89
Yes
No
C-2
Convenience Commercial
0.43
Yes
No
O-M
5.42
Yes
No
Rural Cluster
7.24
Yes
Yes
RE-1
0.04
One-family detached on
40,000 sf, no mix of uses
Yes
Yes
RE-2
3.06
One-family detached on
87,120 sf, no mix of uses
Yes
Yes
R-60
12.82
One-family detached on
6,000 sf, no mix of uses
Yes
Yes
R-200
9.97
One-family detached on
20,000 sf, no mix of uses
Yes
Yes
RC
1 All zones are subject to the densities of the SSA Overlay Zone, including the C-1, C-2, and O-M Zones, which are limited to 0.75 FAR.
Year
Sandy Spring/Ashton
Total
Montgomery County
Total
Number
of Houses
1990
1,329
2000
1,692
363
27%
2011
2,075
383
23%
746
56%
1990
282,228
2000
324,940
42,712
15%
2011
355,434
30,494
9%
73,206
26%
1990-2011
1990-2011
Source: 1990 & 2000 U.S. Decennial Census and 2007-2011 American Community Survey, 5-year estimates.
% Growth of
Houses
Introduction
that requires vehicles to back out into the road. This
design is dangerous to pedestrians and cyclists, and
it inhibits traffic flow.
The Plan provides for major safety improvements
for pedestrian, cyclists and vehicles. The Plan
recommends contiguous shaded, tree-lined roads,
bike lanes, sidewalks, relocated parking and
improved pedestrian crosswalks at intersections.
Open Spaces
The Plan encourages a village green and other
quality open spaces for public gathering and
community activities. Creating additional
vibrant public gathering spaces will add to civic
engagement, place-making and opportunities for
special events and festivals.
This Plan preserves Sandy Springs historical role
as a village center and will include a mix of uses,
connections and quality open spaces.
PLAN FRAMEWORK
Overview
The Sandy Spring/Ashton area is a community of
5,800 in northern Montgomery County, Maryland,
approximately 20 miles north of Washington,
DC and eight miles east of Rockville, Maryland.
Located between two north-south routes (Georgia
Avenue and New Hampshire Avenue), MD 108 is
the east-west main street through the Sandy Spring
Rural Village. MD 200, the Intercounty Connector
(ICC) completed in 2011, is located approximately
five miles south and serves as the main east-west
highway in the northern and central parts of the
County.
Plan Framework
Population Estimates 2010
Age Distribution
Percent
Estimate
Percent
0-4 years
275
4.7%
63,809
6.7%
5-19 years
1,377
23.5%
187,117
19.5%
20-34 years
534
9.1%
182,574
19.0%
35-44 years
666
11.4%
141,623
14.8%
45-64 years
2,022
34.6%
267,203
27.8%
975
16.7%
117,412
12.2%
5,849
0.6%
959,738
1 The Sandy Spring/Ashton area is defined by the boundary of 2010 U.S. Census tract 13.16.
11
History
Plan Framework
the Sandy Spring Store. During that time, the post
office moved to the Sandy Spring Store. To provide
a venue for lectures, the Lyceum, now called the
Community House, was erected next to the meeting
house. By 1879, Brooke Road provided a northerly
extension of the old Meeting House Road.
From the mid-1800s, the village became home
to local institutions of regional or countywide
importance. In 1848, concerned residents organized
the countys first fire insurance company, eventually
known as Montgomery Mutual Insurance
Company, which moved in 1857 to a building
at the southwest corner of MD 108 and Meeting
House Road, opposite from the Sandy Spring Store.
The replacement building from 1904 still stands.
Another institution was born in 1868, when local
farmers formed the Savings Institution of Sandy
Spring Road, now the Sandy Spring National Bank,
the countys oldest bank. First occupying a room at
the fire insurance building, the bank moved to its
own brick headquarters in 1895.
By the early 1900s, the basic form of the village
had been established. The village stretched in a
linear fashion along MD 108, Meeting House Road
and Brooke Road. Non-residential and residential
uses were located side-by-side. The village had
no secondary streets or street grid, and farmland
reached up to MD 108, the main road through the
village. Houses were built close to MD 108 on the
south side. Additional stores were built along the
northeast corner of MD 108 and Brooke Road.
Sandy Spring Post Office and Vicinity (1879 G. M. Hopkins Atlas): The map shows the
formation of the linear commercial development pattern along MD 108, centered around the
important intersection with Brooke Road.
13
Notable Architecture
A portion of the Sandy Spring Rural Village is
located in the Sandy Spring Historic District. This
district comprises public buildings that reflect the
spiritual and financial core of the community. These
buildings are the Sandy Spring Meeting House
(1817), Lyceum (1859), Sandy Spring National
Bank (1895) and Montgomery Mutual Insurance
Company (1904). Additionally, the newer 1977
former Montgomery Mutual Insurance Company
building is also located in the district. The district
is mostly characterized by simple design and brick
construction.
Plan Framework
pediments and aligned windows. Roof areas are
gabled or hipped.
Queen Anne - asymmetrical facades using
varied wall planes and bay windows, towers and
porches; complex intersecting or gabled roofs;
and use of multiple wall materials and textures.
Craftsman - low pitched, front or side gabled
roof areas, generous overhanging eaves, full
or partial porches, and earth-toned colors in
building facades.
15
16
Plan Framework
17
Auburn Village
PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
Sandy Spring Rural Village Concept
18
Plan Recommendations
500 ft
19
500 ft
Plan Recommendations
Encourage various housing opportunities,
including townhouses and residential over retail/
office.
Provide for business expansion, infill and
revitalization opportunities.
Buildings
Throughout the planning process, the community
expressed the importance of developing a historic
main street character for the Village Core
Neighborhood. This character is established, in
part, by how buildings are located along the street.
The south side of the Village Core along MD 108
has a well-defined street edge with buildings placed
close to the street and parking located to the side or
21
Plan Recommendations
23
24
Plan Recommendations
the green and should have ground-floor entrances
and windows that face onto and activate the public
space. Open space recommendations include:
Provide a minimum of acre village green
on the north side of Olney Sandy Spring
Road (MD 108) in the Village Core with a
combination of landscape, hardscape and ample
space for large shade trees with areas for seating.
Provide a wide retail sidewalk along the building
frontage with pedestrian-scaled lighting and
street furnishings.
Provide a small green space that will serve as a
transition from the western rural entry to the
Village Core.
Specific Property Recommendations
1. Parcels P318, P333, and P330 on the North
Side of MD 108 (west of Brooke Road) from
C-2 (CRT 1.5: C 0.75, R 0.75, H 35/SSA
Overlay Zone) to CRN 0.75: C 0.25, R 0.75,
H 45 (See adjacent sidebar).
25
26
Plan Recommendations
infill and redevelopment potential. The Plan
recommends extending the mix of uses north and
east of the existing commercial area. This area
should be revitalized with new local-serving, mixeduse development that has ground-floor retail/office
uses with residential/office above. These properties
can be individually redeveloped or combined for
full assemblage. Once platted, four property owners
can combine and provide a mixed-use project on
approximately five acres. The existing perpendicular
parking area in the right-of-way should be
relocated to the side and rear of the new buildings.
Redevelopment should provide safe vehicular,
pedestrian and bicycle connections, and extensive
tree planting to provide canopy cover over roads and
parking areas.
The CRN Zone is recommended to provide the
uses, especially neighborhood-serving retail and
residential for the village. The Plan recommends:
Three Properties Redevelop
27
28
Plan Recommendations
500 ft
Residential Neighborhood
29
Buildings
The residences along Olney Sandy Spring Road
(MD 108) should continue to be located farther
back from the right-of-way than the buildings in
the Village Core Neighborhood. Along the side
streets beginning at Skymeadow Way, residences are
located closer to the street.
This Plan envisions that any new residential units
built within the neighborhood will meet the street
in a manner similar to the existing buildings. The
height of new residential buildings will be between
one and three stories to match the heights of
existing homes. Building recommendations include:
Housing in the Sandy Spring
Meadows subdivision
30
Plan Recommendations
Opportunities Commission. This subdivision
consists of 61 residential units (30 single-family
detached and 31 attached units). Six R-200 Zoned
single-family detached homes exist along MD 108.
The Plan recommends protecting the singlefamily residential edge along MD 108. An ADAcompliant shared use path is recommended with
trees along the roadway to provide shading for
pedestrians. The Plan recommends:
Protect the single-family residential edge along
MD 108.
Provide housing for all ages and income levels.
Residential Neighborhood
Properties Map
31
Cultural Neighborhood
32
500 ft
Plan Recommendations
new place of worship. To accommodate the influx
of people and improve connectivity within this area,
the Plan recommends extending the existing shared
use path on the north side of MD 108.
This Plan recommends preserving the attractive
rural edge of the Cultural Neighborhood. This rural
entry was identified in the 1998 Plan and continues
to be an important aspect of the areas character.
Planning and land use recommendations for the
Cultural Neighborhood include:
Maintain the rural neighborhood concept to
maintain the rural entries.
Support residential, retail, office and cultural
and religious institutions at an FAR of 0.5 and
maximum heights of 40 feet.
Encourage tree planting along Bentley Road.
Encourage the use of the Museums open space
along MD 108.
Provide pedestrian connections to institutions.
Provide opportunities for shared parking.
Buildings
The existing buildings in the Cultural
Neighborhood have a less defined build-to-area than
the Residential Neighborhood. Buildings are set
back at varying distances from the right-of-way to
further emphasize the rural edge.
New development in this area should be allowed
to have varying setbacks. New buildings should
be between one and three stories in height. The
building recommendations are:
33
Cultural Neighborhood
Properties Map
34
Plan Recommendations
Provide front yard shade trees.
Provide additional street trees.
35
Christophers Hardware
Area-Wide Recommendations
Historic Preservation
The Sandy Spring Rural Village Plan area contains
resources that were designated on the Montgomery
County Master Plan for Historic Preservation,
found eligible for listing on the National Register of
Historic Places, or both. Designation on the Master
36
Plan Recommendations
Heritage Montgomery
Sandy Spring is located within the Underground
Railroad and Quaker Cluster of the Montgomery
County Heritage Area, per the Montgomery
County Heritage Area Management Plan, which
recommends revitalization of Sandy Spring. As a
certified Maryland Heritage Area, Sandy Spring
may therefore qualify for grants for interpretive
signage and promotion through Heritage
Montgomery, which administers the Montgomery
County Heritage Area. This Plan recommends
that interpretive signage and wayfinding be
installed in the Sandy Spring Rural Village Plan
area to highlight Sandy Springs heritage. The Plan
recommends:
37
38
Transportation
This Plan reinforces the 1998 Plans transportation
objectives to maintain the rural character of the
existing roadways while meeting the requirements
stated in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
for compliance.
The underlying C-2, C-1 and O-M Zones allowed a
floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.5. With the Sandy Spring
Overlay Zone, the 1998 Plan reduced the overall
FAR in these zones to 0.75. The overall commercial
square footage provided in the 1998 Plan, even with
the overlay zone, was not achievable over the life
of the plan due to parking requirements, floor plan
constraints and market realities. This Plan retains
the total 0.75 FAR and allows for commercial and
residential uses.
The development potential in the Sandy Spring
Rural Village will not exceed the acceptable
congestion levels at the areas intersections. The
recommended highway and local street system
will provide sufficient capacity. The table on the
following page compares the development potential
Plan Recommendations
for the current Sandy Spring Rural Village Plan
and 1998 Master Plan with what exists today.
The recommended land uses and transportation
infrastructure are in balance.
Capacity
The Plan proposes a small increase of housing units
and a modest decrease of non-residential square
feet. This minor amount of development will have
a limited impact on the transportation system. The
Plan does not propose adding additional through
lanes or additional rights-of-way (ROW) for Olney
Sandy Spring Road (MD 108). The existing ROW
width allows for intersection improvements for
safety and circulation purposes.
Circulation
This Plan recommends that roadway and street
designs should promote pedestrian use with
investment in streetscape elements, including
pedestrian crosswalks and signals (see Proposed
Concept for Olney Sandy Spring Road map on
page 43). Fire trucks and other fire and rescue-
Development Potential
Residential Units
Nonresidential Square Feet
Nonresidential Square Feet Converted to Jobs
Existing Development
78 units
98 units
150 units
420 jobs
725 jobs
660 jobs
Zoning maximum on all development may be reduced to accommodate parking requirements in the zone.
39
Road Classifications
Master Plan
Streets
From
Olney-Sandy
Spring Road
(MD 108)
A-92
80
2 lanes
30
Modified
2004.25
Brooke Road
MD 108
P-2
70
2 lanes
35
Modified
2003.10
Skymeadow
Way
MD 108
Proposed Internal
Connector
B-26
60
2 lanes
25
Modified
2005.01
Bentley Road
MD 108
R-64
70
2 lanes
25
N/A
Meeting
House Road
MD 108
E-14
80
2 lanes
25
N/A
To
Master Plan of
Minimum
Design
Through Travel Target
1
2
Highways Number Right-of-Way (ft)
Lanes
Speed (mph) Standard3
These are the number of planned through travel lanes for each segment, not including lanes for turning, parking,
acceleration, deceleration, and other purposes auxiliary to though travel.
Target speed listed reflects the ultimate target speed upon build out at which people should drive.
40
Plan Recommendations
Sidewalk
(accommodates Planting
Strip and Seating Area)
Build
to Area
Travel Lanes
(with Left Turn
Lane)
80 R.O.W.
Sidewalk
(with Shared Use Path
and Seating Area)
Build
to Area
41
Residential Neighborhood
Cultural Neighborhood
42
Plan Recommendations
Residential Neighborhood
Cultural Neighborhood
43
Skymeadow Way
From MD 108 to a new local road, this section will
be a two-lane business district street with a 60-foot
right-of-way and on-street parking on the west
side of the road. Sidewalk location can be flexible
to allow the retention of mature trees. The rightof-way width is the minimum used in the business
street classification and should be considered the
maximum width for this road except for pedestrian
or safety improvements. The remaining portion of
Skymeadow Way will remain unclassified.
Bentley Road
This Plan recommends changing Bentley Road from
a Country Road to a Rustic Road.
44
Significant Features:
Historic roadway alignment
Holly orchard
Mature trees lining the road
Plan Recommendations
side, and the Sandy Spring Museum sits behind
groups of trees to the east. Passing the museum, the
road is enclosed by forest on both sides, framing
a view of Bloomfield. The road makes a sweeping
turn right as it passes Bloomfield, and climbs.
Passing Oakleigh, located on a rise on the west, long
views across fields can be glimpsed from the house,
and a mature holly orchard, planted in the 1950s, is
seen to the east.
On the east side of the road, Cloverly and its barn
can be glimpsed through the trees edging the road.
The road descends toward a small stream, turning
abruptly left before reaching it. As the road turns,
the pavement narrows as it passes into a tunnel
of trees. A culvert crosses under the road as it
continues north alongside the stream. The views
across the wooded stream valley dominate on the
east as the road ends in a private driveway.
Bentley Road
Holly Orchard
45
Significant Features
Historic roadway alignment/narrow pavement
Relationship of the Sandy Spring Meeting
House to the road and the views of the building
The mature trees lining the road
Description: Meeting House Road intersects with
MD 108 at Brooke Road. Near that intersection,
the road has 20 feet of asphalt pavement, curbs and
gutters. As the road passes the Montgomery Mutual
Building, the curbs end and the pavement narrows
to 12 feet. The road continues within easements
through the Sandy Spring Meeting House property
and south to the Harewood site. The road ends at
the Northwest Branch Stream Valley Park. There
are no shoulders, centerlines or edge markings on
any part of the road. In addition to the Exceptional
Plan Recommendations
found in 2011 to be eligible as individual sites for
the National Register of Historic Places (M: 28-118). The Sandy Spring Meeting House was listed on
the National Register in 1972.
Driving Experience: The entry onto Meeting House
Road at MD 108 is closely flanked by the 1904 fire
insurance building and 1930 fire station. Passing
those and the Montgomery Mutual Building, the
pavement narrows and the road enters the Sandy
Spring Meeting property; the historic Community
House and cemetery are on the east, with a former
County champion tulip-poplar in the cemetery
visible from the road. The Meeting House sits
on the edge of the pavement, facing the road. A
wooded parking loop is on the west. Continuing
south, the narrow pavement is bordered by mature
trees beyond the Meeting House and through the
Auburn property. In addition to the Auburn house,
a notable brick barn is on the left, and a long
view across a field appears on the right. Beyond a
second barn, trees enclose the road, the driveway
to Harewood forks to the right and the road turns
left and climbs, becoming an unpaved driveway as
it enters the Northwest Branch Stream Valley Park.
The driveway emerges on the edge of a field at the
crest of a hill, offering panoramic views. The paved
portion narrows to a rocky track as it curves right
and descends down a long slope under a narrow
canopy of trees leading to The Sandy Spring.
Traffic: The 2014 Average Daily Traffic volume for
Meeting House Road is 800 trips.
47
Plan Recommendations
connecting residences outside of the planning area
to Olney Sandy Spring Road (MD 108).
The planning area is served by the Z2 Metrobus.
This route connects the Silver Spring Metro Station
to Olney at MD 97 and MD 108. The bus travels
along Colesville Road to New Hampshire Avenue,
continuing west on MD 108 to Norwood Road.
There are several bus stops located within this Plan.
This Plan supports the continuation of Metrobus
service within the planning area and any sidewalk,
bicycle and road improvements that need to be
made to accommodate bus service.
Trail Connections
This Plan strongly supports the 1998 Master
Plan goal of providing land uses that offer ample
opportunities for social interaction and promote a
strong sense of community (page 8, 1998 Plan).
Parks, open spaces and Rural Legacy/Rachel
Carson/Underground Railroad Trail provide
connections that build on the communitys strong
sense of identity as a rural area and its heritage.
Bicycle Classifications
Route
Name
Location
DB-49
PB-68
Brooke Road
Bikeway Location
Dual Bikeway: Signed
Shared Roadway and
Shared-Use Path
Signed Shared Roadway
Status
Proposed (Shared-use
path exists only on the
museum property)
Proposed
49
Plan Recommendations
51
IMPLEMENTATION
The Plan supports the preservation of the historic
rural village character of Sandy Spring while
creating a mixed-use village center that serves as a
focal point for community life. In support of the
goal, the following land use and zoning changes are
recommended:
Retain R-200 and the majority of the R-60
Zoning.
Retain the RE-1, RE-2, and RC Zoning.
Propose a Zoning Text Amendment for Cultural
Institutions in the RC Zone.
Rezone a small amount of the R-60 and all
C-2,C-1, and O-M to the CRN Zone.
Remove the SSA Overlay Zone from Sandy
Spring.
Zoning
Retain R-200 and the Majority of the R-60 Zoning
This Plan recommends retaining these existing
residential zones to keep the residential character
along MD 108. These zones create a strong housing
presence in the Sandy Spring Rural Village. The
Plan recommends:
Cluster development to preserve
environmentally sensitive areas.
Provide infill housing for all ages and incomes.
Front houses onto MD 108.
53
Implementation
houses are often located in the Country Inn Zone.
The museum site includes a brick house and a
barn on their property. It is desired to hold the
demonstrations in the barn located on the museum
property. Equally desirable would be to sell the
artists merchandise on the property.
The house can permit up to five unrelated people
living on site, an artist studio with up to five
unrelated people living in the house, bed and
breakfast, rural antique shop, home occupation (low
impact) and guest house. The museum would like
55
CRN Zone
This Plan proposes to replace the commercial zoning
and a small amount of residential zoning in the
Village Core with the CRN Zone along both sides
of Olney Sandy Spring Road (MD 108), along the
east side of Brooke Road. The CRN Zone permits
a mix of residential and non-residential uses at
varying densities and heights. The zone:
Implementation
Zone will also help to establish street-oriented retail,
public gathering spaces and a variety of building
heights along MD 108.
Comparison of the Sandy Spring/Ashton Overlay Zone with the CRN Zone
Overlay
Zone
CRN
Zone
Yes
Yes1
Yes
Yes
24-30 feet
45 feet maximum
Yes
Yes
3. Height limit consistent with the Sandy Spring Historic District and an
appropriate FAR limit for the size and scale of the village center
4. Exclusion of new auto-oriented or typically large-scale uses that are
inconsistent with traditional rural development patterns with flexibility to
ensure the continuation of existing uses through grandfathering
1
Site plan review for buildings over 10,000 square feet and height greater than or equal to 40 feet.
57
Design Checklist
10
Build
to Area
80 R.O.W.
MD 108 Build-to-Area
Implementation
Connections
Great streets have active and vibrant public spaces
and storefronts, accommodate multiple users and
connect to a larger street network. In order to create
a true main street within the Sandy Spring Rural
Village, the follow should be considered:
Eliminating the parking between the ROW and
buildings with revitalization of properties.
Providing continuous sidewalks along both sides
of MD 108.
Ensuring appropriate paving materials for
sidewalks that complement the traditional
architecture of the Sandy Spring Rural Village.
Providing a continuous shared-use path on the
north side of MD 108.
Encouraging a secondary connection on the
north parallel to MD 108.
Providing shade trees in tree boxes in the Village
Core Neighborhood and continuous tree
planting strips in the Residential and Cultural
Neighborhoods.
Encouraging additional crosswalks within the
Sandy Spring Rural Village.
Providing appropriate pedestrian-scaled,
coordinated lighting and wayfinding signage
along the entire stretch of MD 108 within the
Sandy Spring Rural Village Plan.
Allowing for areas with caf seating/street
furniture.
Open Space
Open spaces provide places for community
gatherings. The following should be considered
within the community:
Creating a small gateway open space that serves
a transition from the rural western entry near
the intersection of MD 108 and Norwood Road
to the Sandy Spring Rural Village.
Incorporating a village green space of
approximately 1/4 acres on the north side of
MD 108 with a combination of landscape,
hardscape and ample space for large shade trees
and seating areas.
Providing appropriate paving materials for
sidewalks that complement the traditional
architecture of the Sandy Spring Rural Village.
Supplying appropriate pedestrian-scaled lighting
for the open space.
59
Revitalization Grants
Sustainable Communities: The
State of Maryland has a Maryland
Sustainable Community program.
Sustainable Communities are
entitled to benefits that can help
revitalize them and protect their
historic character, including
income tax credits under certain
circumstances for qualifying
rehabilitation expenses for historic
and non-historic buildings. Most of
the Sandy Spring Rural Village Plan
area is within a Priority Funding area
(excluding the 1895 bank building
and 1904 fire insurance building),
which is a threshold requirement for
becoming a Sustainable Community.
This Plan recommends extending
the Priority Funding Area to the
entire Plan area.
Montgomery County Heritage
Area: The Sandy Spring Rural
Village Plan is located within the
Underground Railroad and Quaker
Cluster Certified Heritage Area
(CHA) and is eligible for funding
of various heritage tourism and
revitalization activities.
60
The Planning Board Draft Plan is the Boards recommended Plan and
reflects their revisions to the Public Hearing Draft Plan. The Regional
District Act requires the Planning Board to transmit a sector plan to the
County Council with copies to the County Executive who must, within
sixty days, prepare and transmit a fiscal impact analysis of the Planning
Board Draft Plan to the County Council. The County Executive may also
forward to the County Council other comments and recommendations.
After receiving the Executives fiscal impact analysis and comments, the
County Council holds a public hearing to receive public testimony. After
the hearing record is closed, the relevant Council committee holds public
worksessions to review the testimony and makes recommendations to the
County Council. The Council holds its own worksessions, then adopts a
resolution approving the Planning Board Draft Plan, as revised.
Acknowledgements
Gwen Wright, Director
Rose Krasnow, Deputy Director
Project Team, Area 3 Division
John Carter, Chief
Kristin OConnor, Lead Planner
Roberto Duke, Urban Design
Rebecca Boone, Principal Administrative Assistant
Fred Boyd, Planner Coordinator
Jonathan Casey, Senior Planner
Michael Garcia, Transportation
Katherine Holt, Transportation *
Katherine Nelson, Environment
Leslie Saville, Senior Planner
Department of Parks, Park Planning
Rachel Newhouse, Park Planner
Historic Preservation Division
Sandra Youla, Senior Planner
Research and Special Projects Division
Richard Liu, Master Planner
Pam Zorich, Planner Coordinator
Legal
Christina Sorrento, Associate General Counsel
Management Services Division
Deborah Dietsch, Editor
Sam Dixon, Senior Graphic Designer
Brian Kent, CAD/GIS Support Specialist
Bridget Schwiesow, Communications Manager
Special Thanks To:
Sandy Spring Civic Association
Sandy Spring Museum
Sandy Spring Friends School
Sandy Spring Meeting House Staff
Miche Booz, Architect
Residents, property owners and business owners that
attended meetings, participated in the workshop and
assisted with drafting the Sandy Spring Rural Village
Plan
*Former Employee