VI. Geometrical Optics: Physics 425 - Modern Optics Geometrical Optics Lecture Notes - W. Andreas Schroeder
VI. Geometrical Optics: Physics 425 - Modern Optics Geometrical Optics Lecture Notes - W. Andreas Schroeder
VI.
Geometrical Optics
GEOMETRICAL OPTICS
Introduction
The description of light propagation in the limit when 0 is known as geometrical or
ray optics. In this limit, diffraction effects disappear and the normal to the wavefront (or
phase front) completely describes the propagation of light. The normal to the wavefront
is known as the optical ray hence the term ray optics.
It can be shown that light takes a path through an optical system that minimizes the
optical path length (i.e. the physical length multiplied by n) between two points. This is a
restatement of Fermats principle;
Light travels the path which takes the least time
this principle guides the design of optical
systems that rely on refraction and reflection
(i.e. contain lenses and mirrors).
E.g. Law of Refraction:
A
d-x
i
ni
O
nt
b
t
B
t=
ni
n
(AO) + t (OB)
c
c
n
= i
c
n
a 2 + (d x )2 + t
c
b2 + x2
Geometrical Optics
dt
= 0;
dx
ni (d x )
nt x
dt
=
+
= 0
dx
c b2 + x2
c a 2 + (d x )2
n
n
i sin i + t sin t = 0
c
c
ni sin i = nt sin t
as expected
d 2t
dx 2
>0.
N.B.
(i)
(ii)
Optical
System
Image
(blurred by
diffraction
effects)
Object
Geometrical Optics
li
lo
n1
n2
so
si
Since O and I are conjugate points, the optical distances OVI and OAI must be equal, i.e.
n1l o + n2 li = n1s o + n2 si
For fixed image and object distances (si and so) we get
n1 l o + n2 li = constant
This is the equation of a Cartesian oval, and describes the shape required by the curved
surface to image the object at point I. In general, the surface is somewhere between an
ellipsoid or hyperboloid, since these two surfaces are required to produce an image or
object at infinity, e.g.
n1 < n2
hyperbolic
Geometrical Optics
n1 > n2
ellipsoidal
NOTE: Objects and images can be reversed in each case (conjugate points).
n1 < n2
Ideal aspheric surface
Spherical surface
Paraxial Approximation.
Geometrical Optics
Paraxial/Gaussian Optics
Consider refraction at an interface with a radius of curvature R in the paraxial limit
(sin , tan , cos 1) ;
A
1
x
O
li
lo
n1
n2
so
si
n1 < n2
Now, Snells Law in the paraxial limit reads
n11 = n2 2
And 1 and 2 are given by
1 = [ ( + )] = +
2 = [ + ( )] =
with sin =
x
.
R
x
n1 +
R
= n 2
R
n1 n2 n2 n1
+
=
s o si
R
x
x
and = ;
so
si
Geometrical Optics
There are conventions associated with this equation describing refraction of light at a
curved interface:
so;
si ;
R;
This equation also allows the imaging of a lens to be described, since a lens is simply two
curved dielectric interfaces.
R1
R2
n1
n2
n3
n 2 n2 n1 n1
=
si
R1
so
And if we have a thin lens (i.e. d << image and object distances), then the image distance
si becomes the object distance for the second surface (i.e. s 'o = si ) , hence
n 2 n3 n3 n 2
+
=
si s 'i
R2
n
n n2
n
2 = 3 3
si
s 'i
R2
Geometrical Optics
n 1 1
1 n 1
=
+
R1 s o
s ' i R2
Thus the focal length, f, of the lens is given by
1
1
1 1
1
=
+ = ( n 1)
f
s o si
R1 R2
the lens-makers equation
N.B.
(i)
(ii)
If the lens is thick then the analysis proceed as outlined above with
s ' o = d si .
Geometrical Optics
2
Optical
System
x1
x2
Optical
Axis
Reference plane #1
Reference plane #2
x 2 A B x1
=
2 C D 1
A B
is the ray transfer matrix (RTM).
Where (xi, i) is the ray vector and
C D
In other words, we have
x 2 = Ax1 + B1
2 = Cx1 + D1 .
Geometrical Optics
(i)
x2
1
x1
d
#1
#2
Clearly:
x 2 = x1 + d1
2 = 1
1 d
RTM =
0 1
(ii)
Geometrical Optics
1
2
x1
O
x2
2
So
Si
n1
n2
#1
#2
For a thin surface the two reference places are essentially coincident so that
x2 = x1
The relationship between 1 and 2 can be found using
n 2 n1 n1 n 2
=
+
R
s o si
x
x
x
since 1 = 1 and 2 = 2 = 1 .
so
si
si
Hence,
n 2 n1
x1 = n11 n 2 2
R
n n1
n
x1 + 1 1
2 = 2
n2
n2 R
RTM = (n 2 n1 )
n2 R
10
0
n1
n2
(iii)
Geometrical Optics
A lens
By either multiplying two RTMs for the two carves surfaces of the lens or by following
the object-image procedure used above, it is straight forward to show that the RTM for a
lens is given by
1
RTM = 1
f
N.B.
(i)
x i +1
x
(ii)
(iii)
units of diopters.
lens = 1 + 2 =
1
n 1 1 n
1 1
=
+
= (n 1)
R1
R2
R1 R2 f
as expected
11
Geometrical Optics
Reflective surfaces
Consider a reflecting surface with a radius of curvature R;
A
'
Si
So
x
x
x
, = , and = ,
so
si
R
Geometrical Optics
A mirror can also be described in the RTM method by modifying the RTM of a spherical
refracting surface;
1
n
RTM(refracting surface) =
2 n1 )
n R
0
n1
n2
Now, for a mirror the refracted ray is reflected which can be taken into account by setting
n2 = n1 (ray travels in opposite direction back into medium with index n1 ).
Thus,
1
RTM(mirror) = 2
R
, except that the last element is negative to account for the fact that
2
2 is measured in the opposite sense to 1 after reflection.
since f =
ALSO: If the incident ray propagates in the +ve direction, then the reflected ray
propagates in the ve direction; i.e., if it propagates a distance d in the ve
direction the appropriate RTM is
1 d
0 1
Thus, RTMs preserve directionality.
BUT: Usually, one unfolds the reflection, replacing the mirror RTM with an
equivalent lens RTM, thus preserving the positive propagation direction
(e.g., for laser cavity stability analysis).
13
Geometrical Optics
Aberrations
Aberrations in optical systems fall into two categories: those associated with a violation
of the paraxial or Gaussian approximation (e.g. spherical aberration), and aberrations due
to dispersion in refracting systems (i.e. chromatic aberrations).
(i)
Non-chromatic aberrations
We will limit the discussion to axial aberrations (i.e. spherical aberration) and
ignore off-axis aberrations such as coma and astigmatism. Spherical aberration is
the focusing of rays with different x values (distances from the optical axis) to
different focii;
effect varies as x 4
14
Geometrical Optics
better than
A lens which has equal refraction at both surfaces is called a best-form lens;
R1 < R2
15
Geometrical Optics
d) Use a compound lens system to correct for aberration, e.g. the tessar;
(ii)
Chromatic aberrations
From the lens-maker equation
1
1
1
= (n 1)
f
R1 R2
It is clear that f is a function of n and hence wavelength;
white
light
blue light
red light
white
light
red light
blue light
n2
n1
_
Realistically, the doublet is only exact for two wavelengths for which the
compound lens is designed.
16
Geometrical Optics
Waveguides
_
an important topic in modern optics; e.g., fiber optics, semiconductor lasers ...
n1
2
t
i
n2
n3
n
sin 2 sin c = 1
n2
n
cos t 1
n2
Now, for the injection of light into the waveguide by end coupling, no sin i = n2 sin t ,
so that for confined propagation of light down the waveguide we require
n
n
sin i 2 1 1
no
n2
NOTE: This result is good for one and two dimensional planar waveguides and optical
fibers. It leads to the definition of the numerical aperture (NA) of a guide;
NAguide = no sin i =
n2 2 n12
17
Geometrical Optics
The allowed propagation modes of a planar waveguide can be found by finding the
conditions under which successive reflected waves interfere constructively with each
other;
n1
E
n2
n3
A
wavefronts
Including the phase changes upon TIR and A and B ( 3 and 1 respectively) we require
k (AB CD ) + 1 + 3 = 2m
m = 0,1, 2, ...
Notice that 1 and 3 are summed since the wavefront BD must be in-phase with
wavefront AC after TIR at A and B.
18
Geometrical Optics
Now,
AB =
d
.
cos 2
And,
CD = CB sin 2
with,
CB = EB EC = d tan 2
d
tan 2
1
CD = d sin 2 tan 2
tan 2
d
sin 2 2 cos 2 2
cos 2
Thus,
kd
1 sin 2 2 + cos 2 2 + 1 + 3 = 2m
cos 2
4n2 d
cos 2 + 1 + 3 = 2m
o
We will restrict the discussion to a symmetric guide (n3 = n1 ) so that 3 = 1 . The TIR
restriction on 2 is then
n
sin 2 1
n2
n
cos 2 1 1
n2
19
Geometrical Optics
mmax
2dn 2
n
1 1
n2
n
2dn2
The quantity, V =
1 1
o
n2
+ 1
n
= n2 kd 1 1 ,
n2
is known as the normalized film thickness for a planar waveguide and the V number for
fibers. Hence,
m max
V + 1
N.B.
(i)
It is usually the transverse electric (TE) wave that propagates down the
waveguide, i.e. the polarization is ;
n1
n2
n1
n cos 2 in1
r = 2
n2 cos 2 + in1
n sin 2
where = 2
n1
20
Geometrical Optics
a 2 + b 2 e i
a + ib
=
a ib
where tan =
2 i
a + ib
we have
a ib
= e 2i
a +b e
b
a
n
2
1
sin 2
n
2
1
= 2 tan
cos 2
(ii)
21
Geometrical Optics
The ray or wavevector k for propagation along a waveguide can be decomposed into a
component along the guide (z-axis) and one perpendicular to the plane of the guide (xaxis);
x
n2k
... k =
= n2 k sin 2
= n2 k cos 2
2
here
o
2 = n2 2 k 2 2
Notice that this propagation vector formalism implies that for the allowed modes of a
symmetric waveguide
sin 2 2 n1
n
2
= 2 tan 1
cos 2
22
= 2 tan
Geometrical Optics
2 n 2k 2
1
The factor
2 n12 k 2 = kn1 = 1
The above definition allows the dispersion relation for a symmetric guide,
2n2 kd cos 2 + 2 = 2m ,
to be rewritten as
d 2 tan 1 1 = m
1
tan (d m ) = 1
2
But, tan ( A B ) =
tan A tan B
, hence after some algebra (!);
1 m tan A tan B
m even
m odd
d
1d = d tan
2
d
1d = d cot
2
(1)
12 = 2 n12 k 2 = n2 2 n12 k 2 2
(1d )2 = V 2 (d )2
(2)
since V = kd n 2 2 n12
The simultaneous solution of equations 1 and 2 give the allowed propagation modes of
the symmetric planar waveguide.
23
Geometrical Optics
N.B.
(i) The mode solutions are usually obtained graphically (or computationally),
e.g. for even m;
(1d)2 = V2 (d)2
1d
d
d tan
a circle!
V
m=0
m=2
m=4
Vc
(ii)
(iii)
n
n2 1 sin 2 = n2 1 1
n2
2
n
sin 2 = 1 sin c
n2
24
(iv)
Geometrical Optics
d<
2d
n2 2 n12 <
o
o
2 n 2 2 n12
core
n2
cladding
n1
25