High Volume Fly Ash Concrete
High Volume Fly Ash Concrete
High Volume Fly Ash Concrete
School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, Australia
Roads ACT, Territory and Municipal Directorate, Canberra, Australia
h i g h l i g h t s
" 50% y ash replacement may signicantly reduce strength and E-modulus.
" Total chloride and RCPT values in 50% y ash concrete are larger than their values in OPC concrete.
" 38 MPa 50% y ash concrete may be obtained with industry practices using 225 kg Portland cement.
" 50% y ash concrete was superior to 450 kg OPC concrete in resistance to chloride caused corrosion.
" Performance index concept is suggested assigning numerical values for strength and durability.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Available online 31 May 2012
Keywords:
Fly ash
Concrete
Cement
Chloride
Corrosion
Performance index
Strength
Sustainability
a b s t r a c t
This paper examines the practicality and suitability of high proportion replacement of cement by class F
y ash. Binary and ternary blends of y ash/Portland cement and y ash/silica fume/Portland cement,
were tested. The investigation focussed on the realistic conditions of concrete making on site and the
effects on the mechanical aspects as well as the consequences on corrosion of reinforcement.
It has been found that class F y ash may replace 50% of the Portland cement and at the same time
result in improving resistance to chloride initiated corrosion. Such replacement however, may signicantly reduce the values of the mechanical properties. Nevertheless, such concrete is considered a high
performance concrete. The authors therefore suggest that the mechanical and durability characteristics
of concretes may be assigned numerical Performance Index values. These values may provide the means
for making informed decisions on the extent of cement replacement by other cementitious materials.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Several researchers have advocated the use of high volume y
ash in high-performance high-strength concrete [14]. Those
researchers have generally used large cement quantities together
with 28 day curing in laboratory conditions to achieve the required
high strength [5,6]. Papayianni and Anastasiou [3] reported high
volume replacement by high calcium y ash up to 50% of the cement. They obtained strength value similar to that of plain OPC
concrete. However, the curing was also for 28 days [3]. Durn-Herrera et al. studied the replacement effect but also with normal curing all the time [7]. Yazici examined ultrastrength concrete with
large replacement up to 60%, and with very high cement content
[8]. He achieved strength above 120 MPa, but the total cementitious content was 850 kg/m3 and the curing was either standard,
72
OPC%
Silica fume%
Fly ash%
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
Na2O, K2O
SO3
Loss on ignition
Specic gravity
Fineness index (m2/kg)
21.1
5.2
4.3
64.2
1.2
0.05, 0.47
2.6%
0.8%
3.13
350
>90
<0.9
<1.5
<0.4
<0.1
<0.4, <0.9
<0.03
2.24
23, 500
67.5
23
4.5
<1
<1
0.5, 1.5
0.1
1.0
2.13
310
Table 1
Chemical composition of ordinary Portland cement, silica fume and y ash.
Chemical composition
Concrete mixes were cast with total cementitious materials content of 450 kg/
m3. The OPC was replaced with low, medium, and high percentage of y ash at the
replacement levels of 25%, 50%, and 70%. Silica fume was used at 10% replacement
of the total cementitious materials content in all the ternary mixes. The chemical
analysis of OPC, silica fume, and y ash used in this series is shown in Table 1.
A total of eight types of mixes were cast using a constant water to binder (w/b)
ratio of 0.38 and varying dosage of superplasticizer. The mixes cast and tested are
shown in Table 2. The mixes were named in Table 2 as follows: OPC is the control
plain ordinary Portland cement concrete. Mix S10 stands for the mix with 10% silica
fume as a weight for weight replacement of Portland cement. Mix F25 stands for the
mix with 25% y ash replacing Portland cement. Mix F25S10 stands for the concrete
with 25% y ash and 10% silica fume replacing Portland cement, and so on. A polycarboxylic ether hyperplasticizer usually used in producing high performance concrete was used in this series.
Table 2
Fresh and mature properties of the control, silica fume and y ash mixes; w/b: 0.38a.
Materials and properties
3
Cement (kg/m )
Silica fume (kg/m3)
Fly ash (kg/m3)
Total cementitious content (kg/m3)
Coarse aggregate (kg/m3)
Fine aggregate (kg/m3)
Superplasticizer L/100 kg binder
Water-effective (kg) (Free)
Slump (mm)
Air content (%)
Hardened concrete (kg/m3) 365 days
a
OPC
S10
F25
F25S10
F50
F50S10
F70
F70S10
450
450
1110
680
1.14
171
65
1.65
2360
405
45
450
1101
675
1.3
171
85
0.9
2344
337.5
112.5
450
1083
664
1
171
130
1.2
2298
292.5
45
112.5
450
1074
658
1
171
60
1.5
2276
225
225
450
1056
646
0.6
171
50
1.2
2232
180
45
225
450
1046
642
1
171
50
1.75
2226
135
315
450
1034
633
0.8
171
25
1.35
2164
90
45
315
450
1025
628
1
171
35
1.95
2135
Aggregate quantities are based on oven dry condition, while the water quantity recorded is the free water.
73
For each mix, cylindrical specimens of size 100 mm diameter by 200 mm length
were cast for the tests of compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and tensile
strength. The plain and blended cylindrical concrete specimens were fog cured
for a period of 7 days then exposed to environmental room conditions maintained
at 23 C and 50% R.H. Mechanical properties of the concrete specimens were tested
after 365 days.
Fig. 5. Trend of the compressive strength when only y ash replaces OPC.
Fig. 2. Effect on 1 year compressive strength of y ash and silica fume replacement
of Portland cement.
74
Fig. 7. Trend of the elastic modulus variation as a result of replacing OPC with only
y ash.
Fig. 8. RCPT results for 1 year old y ash and/or silica fume concretes.
by the fact that silica fumes content, being limited to 10% of the
binding material, can only adsorb a certain quantity of chloride
ions. Thus its presence would be effective and apparent only when
the y ash proportion is low. As for the y ash, it has been shown
that y ash inclusion signicantly changes the electrical conductivity of concrete [22]. Some class F y ashes were demonstrated to
have caused an increase in electrical conductivity [22]. Hence,
when the y ash proportion is high, the effect of silica fume is possibly counter-balanced by an increase in electrical conductivity
caused by y ash. It is appropriate at this stage to draw attention
to the fact that the RCPT is mainly a measure of the ability to pass
a direct current charge [22,23]. For the determination of the chloride ion content as a result of exposure to chloride solution, the
AASHTO ponding test should be used [24].
The effect of y ash on the chloride ion permeability as revealed
by determination of the total chloride content, is shown in Figs. 9
and 10. These two gures show the total chloride contents in the
layer from 5 mm till 25 mm and from 25 mm till 45 mm respectively. These layers represent the proximity to steel reinforcements
in various values of depth of cover. It can be seen that at the shallow depth of 525 mm the chloride ion content was far more than
can be tolerated as a limit for chloride initiated corrosion [25].
Fig. 10 shows that, with the exception of the 70% y ash substitution level, the concentration of chloride ions within the 2545 mm
depth is quite similar in all the types of concretes. Furthermore, it
is seen that the level of chloride concentration in concretes when
the y ash proportion was 50% or less, was well below the critical
value needed for initiating corrosion [22,25].
3.3. Corrosion of reinforcement
The results of corrosion potentials and corrosion current in reinforcing steel placed with 30 mm cover, are presented in Figs. 11
and 12, respectively. These results are obtained after 2 years of
ponding under chloride solution. Fig. 11 shows that only the 70%
replacement level resulted in potentials that are considered conducive for the possibility of corrosion occurring. As it is well known, a
highly negative corrosion potential by itself is not sufcient to conclude that corrosion is active [18,26]. Thus corrosion current values
need to be known so as to determine whether there is active corrosion. The Fig. 12 shows that even the concretes with 70% y
ash replacement showed negligible corrosion activity where corrosion rate was less than 0.1 lA/cm2 [19]. Interestingly enough, the
highest value of corrosion activity was recorded for the concrete
with straight OPC. Concrete where the proportion of replacement
by y ash was 50% of cementitious materials had a current rate value less than 0.06 lA/cm2. This value is considered to be in the
range of minimal corrosion activity [19].
75
4. Conclusions
Table 3
Performance index values.
Concrete type
Compressive
strength
Tensile
strength
Modulus
of
elasticity
RCPT
Chloride
penetration at
525 mm
Chloride
penetration at
2545 mm
Corrosion potentials at
2 year aggressive
environment
Corrosion current at
2 year aggressive
environment
OPC
OPC + 50% y ash
OPC + 50% y
ash + 10%
silica fume
1
0.49
0.45
1
0.65
0.52
1
0.7
0.6
1
0.54
0.54
1
0.92
1.3
1
0.94
1.16
1
1.14
0.88
1
1.9
2.1
76
Acknowledgement
The authors acknowledge the nancial support that this research has received from the University of New South Wales at
the Australian Defence Force Academy, Canberra, Australia.
References
[1] Malhotra VM, Mehta PK. High-performance, high-volume y ash
concrete. Ottawa: SCMSD; 2008.
[2] Rong Z, Sun W, Zhang Y. Dynamic compression behavior of ultra-high
performance cement based composites. Int J Impact Eng 2010;37:51520.
[3] Papayianni I, Anastasiou E. Production of high-strength concrete using high
volume of industrial by-products. Constr Build Mater 2010;24:14127.
[4] Sahmaran M, Li VC. Durability properties of micro-cracked ECC containing high
volumes y ash. Cem Concr Res 2009;39:103343.
[5] Kayali O. Fly ash lightweight aggregates in high performance concrete. Constr
Build Mater 2008;22:23939.
[6] Sukumar B, Nagamani K, Srinivasa Raghavan R. Evaluation of strength at early
ages of self-compacting concrete with high volume y ash. Constr Build Mater
2008;22:1394401.
[7] Durn-Herrera A, Jurez CA, Valdez P, Bentz DP. Evaluation of sustainable highvolume y ash concretes. Cem Concr Compos 2011;33:3945.
[8] Yazici H. The effect of curing conditions on compressive strength of ultra high
strength concrete with high volume mineral admixtures. Build Environ
2007;42:20839.
[9] Termkhajornkit P, Nawa T, Kurumisawa K. Effect of water curing conditions on
the hydration degree and compressive strengths of y ash-cement paste. Cem
Concr Compos 2006;28:7819.