This document provides calculations for the design of a warehouse and workshop building purlin and foundation. It includes:
1. Purlin design calculations that determine the maximum bending moments of 183.35 kg-m and 16.92 kg-m under different load combinations of dead, live, and wind loads. Deflection is also calculated.
2. Foundation design calculations that determine the ultimate bearing capacity and allowable bearing capacity of the shallow foundation based on Meyerhoff theory and a factor of safety of 3. The maximum service load on the foundation is 3.33 tons.
3. Steel section stress ratio calculations are provided for the purlin using its geometric properties and maximum bending moments to check stresses do
This document provides calculations for the design of a warehouse and workshop building purlin and foundation. It includes:
1. Purlin design calculations that determine the maximum bending moments of 183.35 kg-m and 16.92 kg-m under different load combinations of dead, live, and wind loads. Deflection is also calculated.
2. Foundation design calculations that determine the ultimate bearing capacity and allowable bearing capacity of the shallow foundation based on Meyerhoff theory and a factor of safety of 3. The maximum service load on the foundation is 3.33 tons.
3. Steel section stress ratio calculations are provided for the purlin using its geometric properties and maximum bending moments to check stresses do
This document provides calculations for the design of a warehouse and workshop building purlin and foundation. It includes:
1. Purlin design calculations that determine the maximum bending moments of 183.35 kg-m and 16.92 kg-m under different load combinations of dead, live, and wind loads. Deflection is also calculated.
2. Foundation design calculations that determine the ultimate bearing capacity and allowable bearing capacity of the shallow foundation based on Meyerhoff theory and a factor of safety of 3. The maximum service load on the foundation is 3.33 tons.
3. Steel section stress ratio calculations are provided for the purlin using its geometric properties and maximum bending moments to check stresses do
This document provides calculations for the design of a warehouse and workshop building purlin and foundation. It includes:
1. Purlin design calculations that determine the maximum bending moments of 183.35 kg-m and 16.92 kg-m under different load combinations of dead, live, and wind loads. Deflection is also calculated.
2. Foundation design calculations that determine the ultimate bearing capacity and allowable bearing capacity of the shallow foundation based on Meyerhoff theory and a factor of safety of 3. The maximum service load on the foundation is 3.33 tons.
3. Steel section stress ratio calculations are provided for the purlin using its geometric properties and maximum bending moments to check stresses do
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 73
CALCULATION
FOR: WAREHOUSE & WORKSHOP BULDING PROJECT: SKG RANTAU PANJANG 1. MODEL DESIGN
P=
15 m
2 PURLIN CALCULATION Purlin Design Analysis * Span of Purlin Purlin is model as a simple beam analysis Distance between frame is Distance between purlin is Roof slope Put sagrod in the middle of it L frame Lsag = 3
Lframe= Lpurlin= =
1.6667
* Dimensionering try lip channel: A= w= Ix Iy= Wx= Wy= material E= metal sheet roofing
* Loading a. DEAD LOAD Self weight of purlin+bolt Metal steel roofing Ceiling+hanger Mec + elec
W1 W2 W3 W4
Total dead load
Wtot
b. LIVE LOAD Considering roof live load: Point load in the middle of purlin Uniform load from rain water is loading in purlin WLL= (040-0,8xalfa) # according to PPIUG, it should be taken not greater than 20 kg/m2 used LLmax= 20 kg/m2 qLL= c. WIND LOAD qwind= - compression wind Wcomp=
20 kg/m
35 kg/m2 -13.76 kg/m
- sunction wind Wsunc=
14 kg/m
d. EARTHQUAKE LOAD No need for purlin analysis e. LOAD COMBINATION - Dead load + Live load - Dead load + wind load * Forces analysis in Purlin
a. calculate DL + LL (point load)
DL: qx_DL= q_DL sin a= qy_DL= q_DL cos a= LL: Px= P sin a= Py= P cos a=
7.67 21.08 34.20 93.97
calculate bending moment acting on purlin as follow
b. calculate DL + LL (uniformload) DL: qx_DL= q_DL sin a= qy_DL= q_DL cos a= LL: qx_LL= qLL sin a= qy_LL= qLL cos a=
7.67 21.08 6.84 18.79
The grouping of the load on one axis direction of work:
qx1= qy1=
Calculate max bending moment acting on purlin as follow:
Mx2=
My2=
Then the force that determines the bending moment is taken largely fro
c. Calculate DL + WL
qx_Wlsunc= qy_Wcomp= qy_Wsunc=
0 kg/m -13.76 kg/m 14 kg/m
The grouping of the load on one axis direction of work:
qy_c2= 34.84 kg/m so compress wind load that is calculated
Calculate max bending moment acting on purlin as follow:
Mx3= My3= For analysis of purlin bending moment is taken as the greatest bending or DL+WL
d. Bending momen design
From the above calculation, the importance of the maximum bending m
Mx 183.35 kg.m
My
16.92 kg.m
* Strenght and design analysis
b. Checking Deflection a Checking stress all 1600 kg/cm2 Span of purlin : Lframe 5 m the stress in purlin Allowable deflection : Mx x= = Wx Lframe My = all y= Wy 200 status OK if :
as the greatest bending moment of the loading conditions: DL+LL
Mx
183.35 kg.m
My
16.92 kg.m
he maximum bending moment acting on the purlin as follows:
kg/m2 kg/m2
-->
OK
mm
x1=
7.43E-07 mm
y1=
1.29E-07 mm
Sehingga, 1=
7.54E-07
5.79E-07 mm Sehingga, 2= 2.60E-08 mm
5.062808E-007 mm
1.376711E-008 mm
5.80E-07 mm
eflection from the above three loading conditions:
OK
183.35 108.87
5.99 16.92
mm
STEEL STRESS RAYIO CALCULATION
A.
LOAD AND LOADS COMBINATION
1. LOADING DATA Dead Loads (DL) The actual weights of materials shall be used for the purposes of the structural design. 7850 kg/m3 a. Steel (selfweight): 15 kg/m2 b. Roof sheeting + acc: Roof Live Loads (LL) Roof (No access provided except clean and repair) : 50 kg/m 2 Wind Loads (WL) The wind loads shall be taken with the basic wind load is 25 kg/m 2 refer to Doc. SLS00CIVSPC001
Seismic Load (EL)
The seismic load was automatical calculated based on dynamic analysis method by structure analysis program. This Code considers 100% earthquake action in one direction, in combination with 30 % earthquake action in its perp direction. ELx = Fx + 0.3 Fy ELy = Fy + 0.3 Fx Where : ELx : Seismic Load in X direction ELy : Seismic Load in Z direction The Parameter of Structural Design for Regular Shape Building C I R Wt
Earthquake response factor based on Zone factor (Zone 4) and Fundamental Period of Vibration (T) given following figure Spectral Response with Soil type will be considered as hard soil (Zone 4). : Important factor, 1.0 : Earthquake reduction factor Bracing frame of steel structure : R = 5.5 :
Total weight of structure with appropriate live load.
m m m m m m2 m4 m4 Mpa MPa m/sec2 0.00189 m2 0.00225 m2 0.00046 m3 0.00007 m3 0.11747 m 0.03162 m m m
-29.48 kN 41.98 kN.m -0.04 kN.m -8.7 kN 0.01 kN
Allowable stress Allowable stress increment factor: bending major Fb33 = bending minor Fb22 = tension Fat = shear Fv = compression Fac K33 x L33 = 36.51891 r33 K22 x L22 r22
135.6617
1 1600 1600 1600 960
x x x x
1 1 1 1
= = = =
-->> only considered for 3D analysis
Cc
= (2p^2E/Fy)^0,5
1203.516
135.66171162 < (non slender)
>
slender =
So:
Calculation of stress ratio
Axial and bending stress
Fa
5.896
139.56058
Mpa
91.26087 Mpa
fa/Fa=
0.04
0.6
Mpa
771
Mpa
55.9
Mpa
Mpa
Crc =
Crt
CR=
0.17
4.60
Mpa
0.05 0.0044
4.630E-005
Mpa
<
0CIVSPC001
ructure analysis program.
% earthquake action in its perpendicular
tal Period of Vibration (T) given in the
d soil (Zone 4).
depth of beam distance C/C flange width of beam thickness of web thickness of flange cross section area inertia moment in major axis inertia moment in minor axis yield strength of steel elasticity moduli of steel gravity effective shear area in major axis effective shear area in minor axis section moduli in major axis section moduli in minor axis radii of gyration in major axis radii of gyration in minor axis lenght of member in major axis lenght of member in minor axis effective lenght factor in major axis effective lenght factor in minor axis moment coefficient
1600 1600 1600 960
kg/cm2 kg/cm2 kg/cm2 kg/cm2
= = = =
160 Mpa 160 Mpa 160 Mpa 96 Mpa
200
slender =
135.6617
139.561 Mpa
Fac
0.17
OK
FOUNDATION DESAIN A
SOIL PROFILE AND DESAIN PARAMETER
The soil data that is used in this report is still on assumption due to absence of soil investigati SLS Receiving facility. The data are: GWL = 1m NSPT = 25 Cu = 15 t/m2 Es = 11250 t/m2 Us = 0.35 Type of soil = Clay
SHALLOW FOUNDATION ANALYSIS
The condensate drum and pump is designed to be supported with shallow foundation. The ultimate bearing capacity o foundation will be calculated based on Meyerhoff theory as follows:
Where: qult c
q Nc, Nq, N Fcs, Fqs, Fs
= ultimate bearing capacity
= cohesion of soil = unit weight of soil = equivalent surcharge = bearing capacity factor = shape factor
Whereas the allowable bearing capacity of shallow foundation is calculated as follows:
qult Q all = SF Where: SF = Factor of safety = 3 (static condition) For Seismic Condition qall = 1.3 qall Static Condition C *
BEARING CAPACITY ANALYSIS
Design parameter and dimension of footing a. Design parameter used:
soil type: For clay/silty clay c= = Ysat= Y'=
b. Dimension of footing Coloum
Footing
LOAD COMBINATION WHICH PROVIDES MAXIMUM Pu (service)
A.
Loading Data Load from Load combination which provides Pu max (service condition) Vertical reaction force= 3.33 ton Weight of foundation= coloum 0.25 ton backfilling 0.62 ton footing 1.34 ton
a. b.
Total of vertical load
5.55 ton
Horizontal reaction force=
H=
0.96 ton
c.
Moment due to H, distance (a+b+h)
Moment reaction force on base plate
0.85 m
Total moment B.
Checking of stress on soil
Load from load combination which provides Pu max (service condition) e= 0.15 m q1= q2=
C.
4.04 t/m4 0.91 t/m4
Bearing capacity on foundation
calculation of bearing capacity of footing based on Meyerhoff Inclination of load = B'= B-2e L'= L
0 deg 1.11 m 1.6 m
Faktor dapat dilihat di sheet "tabel" yg terletak di sheet terakhir
E. Checking of foundation stability due to overtuning
Overtuning moment= M+H(a+b+h) Mo= 0.82 ton m W1 W2 S1 S2 S3 S4
0.25 1.34 0.08 0.08 0.19 0.19
Resistance moment
Mr
3.83 ton.m
SF overtuning
Sfo
4.69 >
>> Checking of foundation stability due to sliding
ki,k2 SF sliding
0.5 13.82
LOAD COMBINATION WHICH PROVIDES MAXIMUM Hu (service)
A.
Loading Data Load from Load combination which provides Hu max (service condition) Vertical reaction force= 2.91 ton Weight of foundation= coloum 0.25 ton backfilling 0.62 ton footing 1.34 ton
a. b.
Total of vertical load
5.13 ton
Horizontal reaction force=
H=
1.11 ton
c.
Moment due to H, distance (a+b+h)
Moment reaction force on base plate
0.85 m
Total moment B.
Checking of stress on soil
Load from load combination which provides Pu max (service condition) e= 0.18 m q1= q2=
C.
4.04 t/m4 0.91 t/m4
Bearing capacity on foundation
calculation of bearing capacity of footing based on Meyerhoff Inclination of load = B'= B-2e L'= L Bearing capacity factor Nc = Nq= Ny= Depth factor Fcd Fqd Fyd
= = =
0 deg 1.03 m 1.6 m Shape factor Fcs= Fqs= Fys=
5.14 1 0
Inclination factor Fci= Fqi= Fyi=
1.157 1 1
kapasitas dukung tanah menurut meyerhoff
q ultimate SF q all D.
101.27 t/m2 3 33.76 t/m2
Checking of footing dimension
Bmin= P/qall.Lf
1.125 1 0.743
Bmin=
E. Checking of foundation stability due to overtuning
0.09 m
1 1 1
Overtuning moment= M+H(a+b+h)
Mo= 0.94 ton m W1 W2 S1 S2 S3 S4
0.25 1.34 0.08 0.08 0.19 0.19
Resistance moment
Mr
3.53 ton.m
SF overtuning
Sfo
>> Checking of foundation stability due to sliding
LOAD COMBINATION WHICH PROVIDES MAXIMUM Pu (seismic)
A.
Loading Data Load from Load combination which provides Pu max (service condition) Vertical reaction force= 3.89 ton Weight of foundation= coloum 0.25 ton backfilling 0.62 ton footing 1.34 ton
a. b.
c.
Total of vertical load
6.11 ton
Horizontal reaction force=
H=
0.75 ton
Moment due to H, distance (a+b+h)
Moment reaction force on base plate
0.85 m
= =
Total moment B.
Checking of stress on soil
Load from load combination which provides Pu max (service condition) e= 0.10 m q1= q2=
C.
3.95 t/m4 1.51 t/m4
Bearing capacity on foundation
calculation of bearing capacity of footing based on Meyerhoff Inclination of load = B'= B-2e L'= L
1.19 m 1.6 m
Bearing capacity factor
Nc = Nq= Ny=
5.14 1 0
Depth factor Fcd Fqd Fyd
= = =
0 deg
1.157 1 1
kapasitas dukung tanah menurut meyerhoff
Shape factor Fcs= Fqs= Fys=
1.145 1 0.703
Inclination factor Fci= Fqi= Fyi=
1 1 1
q ultimate SF q all*1,3 D.
103.65 t/m2 3 44.91 t/m2
*for seismic condition
Checking of footing dimension
Bmin= P/qall.Lf
Bmin=
0.08 m
>>
E. Checking of foundation stability due to overtuning
Overtuning moment= M+H(a+b+h) Mo= 0.64 ton m W1 W2 S1 S2 S3 S4
0.25 t 1.34 t 0.08 t 0.08 t 0.19 t 0.19 t
Resistance moment
Mr
4.22 ton.m
SF overtuning
Sfo
6.62 >
>> Checking of foundation stability due to sliding
ki,k2 SF sliding *
0.5 19.06
LOAD COMBINATION WHICH PROVIDES MAXIMUM Hu (seismic)
A. a. b.
c.
Loading Data Load from Load combination which provides Pu max (service condition) Vertical reaction force= 3.33 ton Weight of foundation= coloum 0.25 ton backfilling 0.62 ton footing 1.34 ton Total of vertical load
5.55 ton
Horizontal reaction force=
H=
0.96 ton
Moment due to H, distance (a+b+h)
Moment reaction force on base plate
0.85 m
= =
Total moment B.
Checking of stress on soil
Load from load combination which provides Pu max (service condition) e= 0.15 m q1= q2=
C.
3.95 t/m4 1.51 t/m4
Bearing capacity on foundation
calculation of bearing capacity of footing based on Meyerhoff Inclination of load = B'= B-2e L'= L Bearing capacity factor Nc = Nq= Ny= Depth factor Fcd Fqd Fyd
= = =
0 deg 1.11 m 1.6 m
5.14 1 0
1.157 1 1
kapasitas dukung tanah menurut meyerhoff
Shape factor Fcs= Fqs= Fys=
1.134 1 0.743
Inclination factor Fci= Fqi= Fyi=
1 1 1
q ultimate SF q all*1,3 D.
102.66 t/m2 3 44.49 t/m2
*for seismic condition
Checking of footing dimension
Bmin= P/qall.Lf
Bmin=
0.08 m
>>
E. Checking of foundation stability due to overtuning
Overtuning moment= M+H(a+b+h) Mo= 0.82 ton m W1 W2 S1 S2 S3 S4
0.25 t 1.34 t 0.08 t 0.08 t 0.19 t 0.19 t
Resistance moment
Mr
3.83 ton.m
SF overtuning
Sfo
>> Checking of foundation stability due to sliding
ki,k2 SF sliding
0.5 13.82
4.69 >
0.64 ton.m 0 ton.m 0.6375 ton.m
use B=
y1 y2
OK
1.4 OK
0.7 m 0.7 m 1.14 m 0.26 m 0.7 m 0.7 m
0.82 ton.m 0 ton.m 0.82 ton.m
use B=
y1 y2
OK
1.4 OK
0.7 m 0.7 m 1.14 m 0.26 m 0.7 m 0.7 m
REINFORCEMENT ANALYSIS A
Calculation of Mu for Various Condition
1 Load from load combination which provides Pu max (service condition) * Ultimate loading (reaction force) Load combination Provides max Pu Vertical Load 1 x Pu 5.55 Horizontal load 1 x Hu 0.96 Moment force at base 1 x Mu plate 0 Moment due to H, (distance (a+b+h)
0.85
Sum of Moment (Mu)
0.82 0.82
*Soil stress Ultimate
Weight of foundation & backfilling W:
2.22 ton 0.99 t/m 4.83 t/m2 2.10 t/m2
W/m2 q1: q2: *
2.
Mu for flexural reinforcement analysis
L'= (B-bf)/2= 0.53 m Mu= 0,5qL2= 0.67 ton.m
Load from combination which provides Hu max (service condition)
* Ultimate loading (reaction force) Load from load combination which provides Hu max (service condition) * Ultimate loading (reaction force) Load combination Provides max Pu Vertical Load 1 x Pu 5.13 Horizontal loadat base 1 x Hu 1.11 Moment force 1 x Mu plate 0 Moment due to H, 0.85 m (distance (a+b+h) 0.94 Sum of Moment (Mu) 0.94 *Soil stress Ultimate Weight of foundation & backfilling W: W/m2 q1: q2: *
Mu for flexural reinforcement analysis
L'= (B-bf)/2= 0.53 m Mu= 0,5qL2= 0.67 ton.m
2.22 0.99 4.86 1.70
3 Load from combination which provides Pu max (seismic condition)
* Ultimate loading (reaction force) Load from load combination which provides Hu max (service condition) * Ultimate loading (reaction force) Load combination Provides max Pu Vertical Load 1 x Pu 6.11 Horizontal loadat base 1 x Hu 0.75 Moment force 1 x Mu plate 0 Moment due to H, 0 m 0.64 (distance (a+b+h) Sum of Moment (Mu) 0.64 *Soil stress Ultimate Weight of foundation & backfilling W: H: q1: q2: *
2.22 0.99 4.78 2.65
Mu for flexural reinforcement analysis
L'= (B-bf)/2= 0.53 m Mu= 0,5qL2= 0.66 ton.m
4 Load from combination which provides Hu max (seismic condition)
* Ultimate loading (reaction force) Load from load combination which provides Hu max (service condition) * Ultimate loading (reaction force) Load combination Provides max Pu Vertical Load 1 x Pu 5.55 Horizontal loadat base 1 x Hu 0.96 Moment force plate 1 x Mu 0 Moment due to H, (distance (a+b+h) 0 m 0.82 Sum of Moment (Mu) 0.82 *Soil stress Ultimate Weight of foundation & backfilling W: W/m2 q1: q2: *
Mu for flexural reinforcement analysis
L'= (B-bf)/2= 0.53 m Mu= 0,5qL2= 0.67 ton.m
FLEXURAL REINFORCEMENT ANALYSIS X & Y DIRECTION
2.22 0.99 4.83 2.10
Mu h dc db d b f'c fy Ecu Es Ecu f jd
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
As a
= =
0.6657 ton.m 250 mm 75 mm 13 mm 168.5 mm 1000 mm 21 Mpa 400 Mpa 21538.11 MPa 200000 MPa 0.003 0.8 147.4375 mm
6657451.17 Nmm
(clean cover) (bar diameter - first assumption) (first assumption) d= h- (dc+0,5db) per 1 mm
132.81 mm2 2.98 mm
Iteration: in order to obtain new As based on first assumption
As
117.24 mm2
try: D = Asb = n =
13 mm 132.67 mm2 1 unit
Use: n = 5 unit As = 663.33 mm2 spacing = Min spacing= a=
200 dipakai> 30
200 mm
spacing
14.8644258 mm
Baased on above iteration result, moment capacity of footing is as follows:
37666292.171 Nmm =
3.766629 ton.m
Checking minimum reinforcement:
As min
450
As min
482.6025
As min As min < 589.75
589.75
As 663.325 OK
Checking maximum reinforcement:
0.02142
Rho max < 0,75 *
As max
Conclusion, use:
= 0.016065 2706.9525 > OK D
C. Checking toward punching shear
Data: Pu = 3.89 ton
= 0.75 h = 250 mm dc = 75 mm db = 13 mm d = 168.5 mm b = 1000 mm f'c = 21 Mpa fy = 400 Mpa Ecu = 21538.11 MPa Es = 200000 MPa ecu = 0.003 f = 0.8 jd = 147.4375 mm
As
13
663.325 mm2
200
Max value of 1,2xPu from all condition
Sket of punching area
column: bp Lp alfa Note: 40 30
350 500 40
internal column edge
20
corner
b1 b2 c 2(b1+b2)=b0
518.5 668.5 1.43 2374
Calculation of shear capacity:
Vc1=
732819.63869 =
Vc2=
739218.3404 =
Vc3=
611039.11564 =
diambil Vc=
61.103911564 ton
Vc 45.8279337
> OK
Pu 3.89
ton t/m t/m2 t/m2
ton t/m t/m2 t/m2
ton t/m t/m2 t/m2
>
min spacing
OK
SR=
0.194
< OK
mm2
mm2
mm2
mm mm
nternal column
mm mm mm2
73.28196 ton
73.92183 ton 61.10391 ton
SETTLEMENT A
ELASTIC ELEMENT Correlation value of Es with cohesion (clay): > For clay normally consoldated Es = 250 cu - 500 cu > For clay overconsolidated Es = 750cu - 1000cu where c = undrained cohesion clay Es values used in this design is Es = 750 Cu = 750 x 15 t/m2
11250 t/m2
Table 1. Table correlation soil type on Es and s
From the table above, the value of Poisson's ratio s used in this design is 0.35.
Warehouse & workshop building Parameters: Load & dimension of foundation Load, V1=
3.33 ton
Column width, bp=
Column lenght, Lp= Column height over soil surface, a = Column height under soil surface, b = Footing width, Bf = Footing lenght, Lf = Footing thickness, h =
0.35 m 0.5 m 0.3 m 0.3 m 1.4 m 1.6 m 0.25 m
Total foundation height, W =
Total backfill weight, Y = Total load occured, P1 = (V1+W+Y) Soil parameters Undrained shear strenght, cu = Saturated density, Ysat = Effective density, Y' = Young's modulus = 750 x Cu = Poisson's ratio, =
1.596 ton 0.6195 ton 5.5455 ton
15 t/m2 1.8 t/m3 0.8 t/m3 11250 t/m2 0.35
Working load, q01 =
L/B = factor of ratio L/B, =
2.73 t/m2 1.142857143 1
Based on the results of soil investigation and labs results the value of elastic settlement is:
Se=
0.000298 m
B. CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENT
0.298116 mm
Based on the results of soil investigation, soil consists of clay soil with water table elevation are at ground surface. In addition, soil investigation also get NSPT value below the water table is 23->60. This soil is categorized into the type of very stiff to hard silty clay. The consolidation settlement will be very small and could be negleted.
C. DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENT CHECK
Based on design basis criteria, the differential settlement between two foundations is half of the total settlement whereas the differential settlement should not exceed the criteria L/250 . The total settlement is the sum of elastic settlement and consolidation settlement due to the shelter weight. The total settlement on this case is
ST = Se + Sc = 0.298116 mm Hence the differential settlement occurred on this case is
= 0.088873 mm While on steel building the criteria for differential settlement is
L 250
= L=
6400 250 25.6 mm
Since the differential settlement is less than the used criteria, hence the differential settlement aspect is safe on this analysis
