DPA Fact Sheet Drug War Mass Incarceration and Race Jan2015 PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

The Drug War, Mass

Incarceration and Race


January 2015

With less than 5 percent of the worlds population


but nearly 25 percent of its incarcerated
population1, the United States imprisons more
people than any other nation in the world largely
due to the war on drugs. Misguided drug laws and
harsh sentencing requirements have produced
profoundly unequal outcomes for people of color.
Although rates of drug use and sales are similar
across racial and ethnic lines, black and Latino
people are far more likely to be criminalized than
white people.2

stopped, searched, arrested, convicted, harshly


sentenced and saddled with a lifelong criminal record.
This is particularly the case for drug law violations.
Drug Arrests, 1980-2013
2,000,000
1,500,000
Sales
1,000,000
500,000

Possession

1980
1983
1986
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
2004
2007
2010
2013

World Incarceration Rates


USA
Rwanda
Russia
Brazil
Australia
Spain
China
Canada
France
Germany
Sweden
India

707
492
467
289
143
141
124
118
102
81
57
33

Incarceration
Rate Per
100,000

Source: International Centre for Prison Studies, World Prison Brief.3

The Drug War Drives Mass Incarceration and


Racial Disparities in U.S. Judicial Systems
There were more than 1.5 million drug arrests in the
U.S. in 2013. The vast majority more than 80
percent were for possession only.4 At year-end 2012,
16 percent of all people in state prison were
incarcerated for a drug law violation of whom nearly
50,000 were incarcerated for possession alone.5 More
than 50 percent of people in federal prisons are
incarcerated for drug law violations. About 500,000
Americans are behind bars on any given night for a
drug law violation6 ten times the total in 1980.7
People of color experience discrimination at every
stage of the judicial system and are more likely to be

Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports.8

Black people comprise 13 percent of the U.S.


population,9 and are consistently documented by the
U.S. government to use drugs at similar rates to
people of other races.10 But black people comprise 30
percent of those arrested for drug law violations11
and nearly 40 percent of those incarcerated in state or
federal prison for drug law violations.12
Widely adopted in the 1980s and 90s, mandatory
minimum sentencing laws have contributed greatly to
the number of people of color behind bars.13 Research
shows that prosecutors are twice as likely to pursue a
mandatory minimum sentence for black people as for
white people charged with the same offense.14
Mass Incarceration Destroys Families
2.7 million children are growing up in U.S. households
in which one or more parents are incarcerated. Twothirds of these parents are incarcerated for nonviolent
offenses, including a substantial proportion who are
incarcerated for drug law violations. One in nine black
children has an incarcerated parent, compared to one
in 28 Latino children and one in 57 white children.15

Drug Policy Alliance | 131 West 33rd Street, 15th Floor, New York, NY 10001
[email protected] | 212.613.8020 voice | 212.613.8021 fax

Disproprotionate Impact of Drug Laws


on Black and Latino Communities
White

Latino

Black

70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
U.S. Population

People in State
Prison for Drug
Offenses

People in Federal
Prison for Drug
Offenses

Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; Bureau of Justice Statistics 16

Policy Recommendations
1. Decriminalize drug possession, removing a major
cause of arrest and incarceration of primarily
people of color, helping more people receive drug
treatment and redirecting law enforcement
resources to prevent serious and violent crime.
2. Eliminate policies that result in disproportionate
arrest and incarceration rates by changing police
practices, rolling back harsh mandatory minimum
sentences, and repealing sentencing disparities.20
3. End policies that exclude people with a record of
arrest or conviction from key rights and
opportunities. These include barriers to voting,
employment, public housing and other public
assistance, loans, financial aid and child custody.
1

U.S. Male Incarceration Rates,


December 31, 2013
3000

White

2000

Latino

1000
0

Black
Rate Per 100,000 State and Federal
Prison

Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2014.17

Collateral Consequences of Mass Incarceration


Punishment for a drug law violation is not only meted
out by the criminal justice system, but is also
perpetuated by policies denying child custody, voting
rights, employment, business loans, licensing, student
aid, public housing and other public assistance to
people with criminal convictions. Criminal records often
result in deportation of legal residents or denial of entry
for noncitizens trying to visit the U.S. Even if a person
does not face jail or prison time, a drug conviction
often imposes a lifelong ban on many aspects of
social, economic and political life.18
Nothing has contributed more to the systematic
mass incarceration of people of color in the United
States than the War on Drugs.
Michelle Alexander, The New Jim Crow (2010).

Such exclusions create a permanent second-class


status for millions of Americans, and, like drug war
enforcement itself, fall disproportionately on people of
color. Nearly eight percent of black people of voting
age are denied the right to vote because of laws that
disenfranchise people with felony convictions.19

Roy Walmsley, World Population List, 10th Ed. (London: International Centre for
Prison Studies, 2013); National Research Council, The Growth of Incarceration in
the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences (Washington, D.C.: The
National Academies Press, 2014).
2
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, "Results from the
2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health," (Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse
and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014), Table 1.19B; Jamie Fellner,
Decades of Disparity: Drug Arrests and Race in the United States (Human Rights
Watch, 2009); Meghana Kakade et al., "Adolescent Substance Use and Other
Illegal Behaviors and Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice System Involvement:
Findings from a U.S. National Survey," American Journal of Public Health 102, no.
7 (2012). While national arrest data by ethnicity are not systematically collected
and are therefore incomplete, state-level data show that Latinos are
disproportionately arrested for drug offenses. Drug Policy Alliance and Marijuana
Arrest Research Project, "Race, Class and Marijuana Arrests in Mayor De Blasio's
Two New Yorks: The Nypd's Marijuana Arrest Crusade Continues in 2014,"
(2014); California Department of Justice, "Crime in California 2013," (2014).
3
International Centre for Prison Studies, World Prison Brief,
http://www.prisonstudies.org/world-prison-brief (2014).
4
Federal Bureau of Investigation, "Crime in the United States, 2013,"
(Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 2014).
5
E. Ann Carson, "Prisoners in 2013," (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2014), Tables 13 & 14.
6
Ibid., Tables 14 & 15.
7
Peter Reuter, "Why Has Us Drug Policy Changed So Little over 30 Years?,"
Crime and Justice 42, no. 1 (2013); National Research Council, The Growth of
Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences.
8
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reports; Bureau of Justice
Statistics, Arrest Data Analysis Tool.
9
U.S. Census Bureau, Quick Facts (2014)
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html.
10
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, "Results from the
2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health," Table 1.19B.
11
Federal Bureau of Investigation, "Crime in the United States, 2013," Table 43.
12
Bureau of Justice Statistics, Federal Justice Statistics Program; Carson,
"Prisoners in 2013," Table 14.
13
National Research Council, The Growth of Incarceration in the United States:
Exploring Causes and Consequences.Barbara S. Meierhoefer, The General Effect
of Mandatory Minimum Prison Terms (Washington: Federal Judicial Center, 1992),
20; Marc Mauer, "The Impact of Mandatory Minimum Penalties in Federal
Sentencing," Judicature 94(2010).
14
Sonja B Starr and Marit Rehavi, "Mandatory Sentencing and Racial Disparity:
Assessing the Role of Prosecutors and the Effects of Booker," Yale Law Journal
123, no. 1 (2013).
15
Bruce Western and Becky Pettit, Collateral Costs: Incarceration's Effect on
Economic Mobility (Pew Charitable Trusts, 2010), 4.
16
Carson, "Prisoners in 2013," Table 14; Bureau of Justice Statistics, "Federal
Justice Statistics Program," http://www.bjs.gov/fjsrc/.
17
Carson, "Prisoners in 2013," Table 8.
18
Meda Chesney-Lind and Marc Mauer, Invisible Punishment: The Collateral
Consequences of Mass Imprisonment (The New Press, 2011).
19
Christopher Uggen et al., "State-Level Estimates of Felon Disenfranchisement in
the United States, 2010," (Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project, 2012).
20
The federal government recently indicated its intention to undertake some of
these reforms. Eric Holder, "Memorandum to United States Attorneys: Department
Policy on Charging Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Recidivist Enhancements
in Certain Drug Cases," (Washington, D.C.: Office of the Attorney General, United
States Department of Justice, 2013).

Drug Policy Alliance | 131 West 33rd Street, 15th Floor, New York, NY 10001
[email protected] | 212.613.8020 voice | 212.613.8021 fax

Page 2

You might also like