Welding Chrome-Moly Steel: What You Should Know About T-1 Wires
Welding Chrome-Moly Steel: What You Should Know About T-1 Wires
Companies traditionally have relied on shielded metal arc welding (SMAW, or stick) electrodes for welding
chrome-moly tube and pipe, in part for the mechanical and chemical properties they provide and in part because
they are the accepted standard specified for such applications. However, with greater demands to increase
productivity and stay competitive, some companies are considering a wire welding process as a means to get
ahead. Some have begun to use T-1 or T-5 gas-shielded, flux-cored wires, both of which have undergone
significant advancements in recent years and offer greater consistency than similar products offered in the past.
Like any filler metal, flux-cored wires for chrome-moly have distinct advantages and disadvantages. Flux-cored
wires main advantage is speed. Because it comes on a spool and is hundreds of feet long, it can provide a long,
continuous weld, which is much faster than stopping to get a new stick after 12 or 15 inches of welding.
However, flux-cored wire isnt the best consumable for every welding job. Learning about the main types of
flux-cored wire for chrome-moly tube and pipe is the first step in considering the switch.
A T-1 wires slag system results in an easy-to-remove slag and makes the wire well-suited for welding on
multipass applications because it requires minimal cleanup between passes. This category of wire also creates
low amounts of spatter, which reduces the need for postweld cleaning.
Typically, T-1 flux-cored wires for chrome-moly have a table arc and weld smoothly. Consequently, they
appeal to welders across a broad skill range, even those with little flux-cored arc welding (FCAW) experience.
The wires operate with either 100 percent CO2 shielding gas or a blend of argon and CO2 (usually in a 75/25
percent mixture) and provide a high deposition rate. They also create well-shaped, uniform, and smooth weld
beads and are available in low-hydrogen versions. In the past T-1 flux-cored wires were available only in H16
or H8 versions, meaning they had 16 or 8 milliliters of diffusible hydrogen, respectively, per 100 grams of weld
metal. Some of todays T-1 flux-cored wires are available in an H4 version; as the designation implies, they
have as little as 4 ml of diffusible hydrogen per 100 g of weld metal.
Additionally, many T-1 flux-cored wires also are useful for out-of-position welding, allowing their use on
existing piping systems. Steam piping, heat exchangers, and other high-temperature, corrosion-resistant
applications are common examples that can benefit from these wires. The ability to weld out-of-position
provides a distinct advantage over other processes, such as submerged arc welding, which are suitable for use
only in the flat position or while the tube or pipe rotates.
That said, T-1 wires do have disadvantages that limit the chrome-moly applications on which they can be used.
First, T-1 flux-cored wires tend to create welds with slightly higher oxygen content than other filler metals,
typically 600 to 1,200 parts per million (PPM). Compared to stick electrodes or T-5 flux-cored wires (to be
discussed later), this higher oxygen content reduces the toughness of the T-1 weld in both the as-welded and
post-weld heat-treated (PWHT) conditions. Cool ambient temperatures aggravate this characteristic, so T-1 wire
is not the best candidate for applications such as the cold start of a power plant that has been shut down or a
piping application subject to extremely cold weather. As a rule, T-1 flux-cored wires for chrome-moly also have
higher weld metal hardness compared to a stick electrode or submerged arc wire, which makes them more prone
to cracking.
many cases, they are not as efficient for multipass welding due to their difficult-to-remove slag, which requires
more chipping between weld passes than a T-1 wire.
Typically, suppliers offer T-5 flux-cored wires for chrome-moly applications in two product classes: B2 and B3.
The wires in the B2 product class contain 1.25 percent chrome and 0.5 percent molybdenum and are well-suited
for welding P11 chrome-moly pipe that is subject to high-temperature service conditions. The B3 product class
contains 2.25 percent chrome and 1 percent molybdenum. They are typically used for welding P21 and P22
chrome-moly pipe and are also good for high-temperature applications.
Ultimately, the challenge of T-5 wires is that they can be difficult to use and usually are limited to flat and
horizontal welding positions. In recent years, however, new versions of T-5 flux-cored wires have emerged,
including the E81T5-B2M H4 wire mentioned previously, along with those classified as E91T5-B3M H4. These
wires have slightly different characteristics than traditional T-5 wiresnamely, they are more readily weldable
out of position, particularly vertical-up and vertical-down.
These wires operate with a mixed shielding gas (argon and CO2) rather than straight CO2, which provides a
stable arc similar to, but not as steady as, that of a T-1 flux-cored wire. As a result, these wires often are easier
to train welding operators to use, but they still provide the toughness desired with a traditional T-5 wire. Usually
they have impact properties of more than 37 joules at -58 degrees F in the as-welded condition. In the PWHT
condition, they can offer toughness greater than 47 joules at -40 degrees F. These newer T-5 wires typically
have greater slag coverage as well. The slag provides good-quality welds, yet is relatively easy to remove.
One disadvantage of these newer wires, however, is that unlike other T-5 wires, they operate on DC, negative
polarity (DCEN) and therefore require a different power source. Also, the weld puddle on these wires types
tends to behave differently than other T-1 or T-5 wires, which may require additional welder training to use
them properly.
The X-Factor
With these newer wires, as well as the traditional T-5 flux-cored wires and T-1 wires, the X-factor is critical.
The X-factor is a formula that measures a weldments resistance to temper embrittlement, which is the
brittleness, or loss of toughness, that occurs when the weldment is held (or slowly cooled) through a
temperature range of approximately 850 to 1,100 degrees F. It is particularly important when welding chromemoly. For all types of flux-cored wire welding of chrome-moly, the X-factor should be below 15.
Engine-driven welding generators feature 5,500 to 20,000 watts of generator power, depending on the model,
for running grinders (pictured), drills, and other tools needed for field repair.
Broken equipmentwhether it's a large excavator in a gravel pit or a conveyor belt in a processing planteats
away at your profits. You can almost hear the money blowing away in the deafening silence of an idle machine.
Repairing broken steel components in the field requires mastery in three areas:
Carbon arc gouging is another cutting/gouging option when using welding generators with 300 to 500 amps of
output and a high duty cycle. Carbon arc gouging uses a carbon electrode to melt the defective area and blast
away molten metal with a focused, high-pressure stream of air.
To begin the repair, cut away the damaged area and remove all rough edges to ensure proper fit-up of the
replacement part. It is extremely important to fully grind out all crackseven beyond what's visiblebecause
even the slightest remnant of a defect will continue cracking, even after a weld is laid over it.
A common wire for flux-cored welding in repair applications is the self-shielded, general-purpose E71T-11
wire. Another option is E71T-8JD H8. These wires are all-position, multipass wires with good impact properties
at low temperatures. FCAW can replace and improve productivity over 7018 stick welding in certain
applications. Both wires offer higher deposition rates than stick electrodes, and the slag removes easily. An
added benefit of flux-cored over stick is that with the former, there typically is no need to switch between wire
types or sizes for the same repair. This allows you to lay bead after bead while stopping only to remove slag.
Figure 1
All-in-one machines that can plug into both 115- and 230-volt power provide field welding repair flexibility
without having to constantly link back to a welding generator on a service truck.
Selecting the right machine for stick welding is based largely on the diameter of electrodes to be used. A 1/8-in.
electrode welds up to 145 amps, while a 5/32-in. rod performs optimally at about 180 amps. Therefore, a
welding generator with a 100 percent duty cycle at 250 amps offers enough welding power to meet most stick
welding needs.
For flux-cored welding, a welding generator with constant voltage (CV) output provides superior wire welding
performance versus a constant current (CC) machine. A CV output also is necessary for short-circuit gas metal
arc welding (GMAW) for general fabrication. Amperage requirements vary based on the type and diameter of
wire you are using, but 250 to 350 amps is sufficient for most applications.
You also need to match your welding generator with a wire feeder for flux-cored welding. There are two
options for field work: portable suitcase wire feeders with either remote voltage controls or voltage-sensing
capabilities. A remote control machine offers voltage and wire feed speed control at the feeder and no
mechanical contactor, which lowers its weight. These machines require a welding generator with a 14-pin
receptacle and an extra cord between the feeder and the welder. This limits this particular feeder to within 100
ft. of you. A voltage-sensing wire feeder, however, works with any welding generator and is easy to hook up
with no additional cables. The only real downsides to a voltage-sensing feeder are the lack of voltage control at
the feeder and a little extra weight from its mechanical contactor.
On the opposite end of the size spectrum are portable, all-in-one machines (Figure 1) for repair in hard-to-reach
locations (deep inside a plant, high up on scaffolding). These machines offer GMAW and flux-cored
capabilities up to 150 amps and can plug into any 115- or 230-V power. This provides a portable, remote field
welding solution for jobs for which it may be tough to get a truck near the weld. You can even perform repairs
on stainless steel and aluminum by using the self-contained gas cylinder and by adding a spool gun with the allin-one machines.
Figure 2
Machines that comprise welders, generators, and air compressors in the same unit take only half the bed space
of a separate engine-driven air compressor and welder, freeing up 50 percent more room on your truck for
equipment and supplies.
To perform carbon arc gouging, you need to make sure your machine is rated for the carbon diameter you want
to run.
Contractors have come to expect the dual welding and power generation capabilities of engine-driven welding
generators (Figure 2). These machines save space on maintenance trucks by eliminating the need for a standalone generator and have the power to run grinders, drills, chop saws, lights, and air compressors. Some
machines have two separate generators in the same unitone for the welding arc and one for auxiliary tools.
Keeping these generators separate allows a worker to fire up any tool off of the machine's generator while
another person is welding without affecting the performance of the welding arc.
For heavy-duty repairs and space savings on maintenance trucks, fleet managers might consider options that
also include self-contained rotary screw air compressors for running air tools and plasma cutters.
Another factor to consider when selecting an engine drive is fuel. Most welding generators are available in
gasoline and diesel. Gas engines offer a lower product cost, reduced weight, and smaller size. Diesel engines
use 20 to 35 percent less fuel, have longer engine lives, and are required on certain sites. Choose whichever fuel
option best suits your needs and work environment.
Figure 1
Brazing takes place above 840 degrees F but below the melting point of the base metal.Source: CDA, Copper
Tube Handbook.
Four processes to consider when joining copper and copper alloys are mechanical couplings, welding,
soldering, and brazing. Brazing is suitable for small parts and when high joint strength is required. According to
the American Welding Society (AWS), the strength of a brazed joint can meet or exceed that of the metals
being joined. It is important to know when to choose brazing and how to perform the process.
From a process standpoint, soldering and brazing are essentially the same. The only differences are the filler
metals used and the amount of time and heat required to complete the joint. AWS defines soldering as a joining
process that takes place below 840 degrees F, while brazing takes place above 840 degrees F but below the
melting point of the base metal. In actual practice for copper systems, most soldering is done at temperatures
from about 450 degrees F to 600 degrees F, while most brazing is done at temperatures from 1,100 degrees F to
1,500 degrees F. When brazing copper tube, however, the annealing of the tube and fitting that results from the
higher heat can cause the rated pressure of the system to be less than that of a soldered joint.
Copper's melting point is 1,981 degrees F (liquidus) and 1,949 degrees F (solidus). For brazing, it is important
to know the melting points of the metals to be joined and the filler metal. The difference between the solidus
and liquidus state is the melting range, which may be important when selecting a filler metal. It indicates the
width of the working range for the filler metal and the speed with which the filler metal solidifies after brazing.
Filler metals with narrow ranges, with or without silver, solidify more quickly and, therefore, require careful
application of heat. The liquidus temperature is the minimum at which brazing will take place. SeeFigure 1for
the melting ranges of some common brazing metals.
Figure 2
The table shows how fluxes respond at various temperatures and at what maximum temperature the flux will
protect the metal.Source: CDA, Copper Tube Handbook.
According to Lucas-Milhaupt's What Brazing Is All About (www.lucasmilhaupt.com), the choice to braze
comes down to five factors:
1. The size of the parts to be joined. Brazing is more often used for small parts and requires heating a broad
surface to bring the filler material to its flow point, which is often impractical with large pieces.
2. Thickness of the metal sections. The broader heat and lower temperature used in brazing, as opposed to
welding, permit the joining of sections without warpage or metal distortion. The intense heat of welding
may burn through or warp a thin section.
3. Joint configuration. Brazing needs no manual tracing, and the filler metal is drawn through the joint area
by capillary action, which works with equal ease on straight, irregular, or tubular joints.
4. Nature of the base metals. For joining dissimilar metals, brazing won't melt one or both of the metals if
the filler metal is metallurgically compatible with both base metals and has a melting point lower than
either of the metals to be joined. Note that copper alloys can be readily brazed to other metals, such as
cast iron, tool and stainless steels, nickel alloys, and titanium alloys.
5. Number of joints to be made. If you are making many joints, manual brazing is quick and simple, and
automated brazing may be accomplished inexpensively using simple production techniques.
Brazing Fluxes
Brazing fluxes for copper are water-based, dissolve and remove residual oxides from the metal surface, protect
the metal from oxidation during heating, and promote wetting of the surfaces to be joined. Brazing fluxes also
provide you with an indication of temperature (see Figure 2).
Figure 3
This table, a reference for brazing all copper and copper alloys, includes information for selecting the proper
filler materials and fluxes, surface preparation,and atmospheres for brazing. Source: AWS, Welding Handbook.
The most commonly used fluxes and brazing filler materials for copper and copper alloys are shown in Figure
3, and a guide to their use is shown in Figure 4. This and other detailed information can be found in The
Welding Handbook, 8th Edition, Vol. 8, published by the American Welding Society and available from the
Copper Development Association under the title Welding Copper and Copper Alloys, A1050-72/97.
Figure 4a
This copper brazing guide lists commonly used filler metals, fluxes, atmospheres, and special considerations.
Source: AWS, Welding Handbook.
The Process
The same basic steps are used for brazing as for soldering, with the only differences being the use of fluxes,
filler metals, and the amount of heat used.
Figure 4b
In general, both lap and butt joints can be made. Be sure to remove all oxides and surface oils with abrasive
cloth, pads, or brushes before joining the metals. Such contaminants interfere with the proper flow of filler
metal and may lessen the joint strength or cause failure. Chemicals cleaners may be used if they are thoroughly
rinsed off, but be sure you don't touch the clean surface with bare hands or oily gloves.
Apply a thin, even coating of flux with a brush to both surfaces soon after cleaning. Do not apply the flux with
your fingers because the chemicals in the flux can be harmful if it comes in contact with your eyes, mouth, or
open cuts. Copper-phosphorus and copper-silver-phosphorus metals (BCuP) are considered self-fluxing on
copper-base metals.
Support the surfaces securely and ensure an adequate capillary space between them for the flow of the molten
brazing filler. Excessive joint clearance can lead to cracking under stress or vibration. A joint clearance of 0.001
to 0.005 in. will develop the maximum joint strength and soundness.
Use only the amount of heat necessary to melt and flow the filler metal. Overheating the joint or directing the
flame into the capillary space can burn the flux, destroying its effectiveness and preventing the filler metal from
entering the joint properly. Apply the heat around the joint area to draw the filler metal into the capillary space.
When dealing with an open flame, high temperatures, and flammable gases, safety precautions as described in
ANSI/AWS Z49.1, "Safety in Welding, Cutting and Allied Processes," must be observed.
Allow the completed joint to cool naturally. Shock cooling with water may stress or crack it. When it is cool,
clean off any remaining flux residue with a wet rag and test all completed assemblies for joint integrity.
Failure Analysis
Almost anything can fracture. The science investigating the
origins of fractures is called failure analysis, and it is used to
establish responsibilities for fractures and to determine
preventive measures for avoiding future occurrences. An
introductory, interesting book on this subject was written by
Donald J. Wulpi and is titled Understanding How Components
Fail. 1
Service Failures
This article discusses only in-service weldment breakage, also described as service failures. Weldments are
assemblies with parts joined by welding. Failures occurring during or immediately following welding are easier
to deal with, because all conditions are known.
So if the item was welded originally, it should be weldable again for repair, right?
Yes, but only if you know the materials and their conditions and whether they still are exactly as they were at
fabrication timeno heat treatment or other surface conditioning has been introduced. You also must know the
precise process and welding procedure that were used in the first place, which usually isn't the case.
Firmly resist the pressing urge (your own and of those around you) to supply a theory for the breakage,
especially before having assembled all the information.
A description of the weld profile as visible under low-power magnification should include such details as
dimensions and fit-up as much as they can be determined visually. If possible, these details should be compared
with design requirements.
When the structure operates normally at elevated temperature, it is probably under some code legislation that
may request an official investigation.
A weld breakage usually is a crack or a fracture. Much information can be drawn from an exact description of
the failure. A crack should be characterized by its dimensions, by its orientation (longitudinal, along the weld
bead, or transversal), and by its position relative to the weld itself (on the weld bead or on its sides, in the heataffected zone, or in the base metal).
If the fracture is open, do not reassemble the mating parts. Doing so can obliterate important clues. Inspect the
fractured surfaces with a low-power lens or microscope that can show internal defects like gas holes or pores,
nonmetallic inclusions, or indications of fatigue failure in the form of concentric beach marks.
The presence of macroscopic deformations and the fibrous or glassy aspect of the surfaces should be assessed to
reveal if the failure was ductile (with deformation) or brittle (without deformation).
Specific colors on the surfaces should be remarked; they might be clues about local heating and oxidation. The
extent of corrosion, if present, has to be determined and documented.
The presence of arc strikes on the surface, improper starting conditions, or accidental contact may be at the
origin of considerable damage.
Hardness testing is a very informative, simple, nondestructive test. However, selecting the proper locations,
especially if the weldment must be sectioned for testing, may be beyond what can be expected from a technician
not specifically trained for this kind of investigation.
The materials involved should be known and their properties checked for conformance to specifications. No
weld repair should be attempted without this essential knowledge. Having this information allows you to select
the proper repair procedures and filler metal.
If materials are not known, an effort should be made to provide at least qualitative information. This
information can be obtained by X-ray fluorescence, a nondestructive test readily available from many metalrelated services.
What Next?
Having assembled and organized all the facts, you now should be able to formulate an educated guess as to the
possible causes of the failure.
Was faulty workmanship the culprit? A professional investigation service uses metallographic examinations of
weld sections to look for weld defects in the original weldment. Obviously, faulty welds should have been
detected by inspection after manufacturing, but nobody is perfect. If the original weld was faulty, a repair weld
performed with utmost care should improve the future in-service performance of the repaired item.
A design change is not normally applicable for repair. However, if it is clear a faulty design caused the failure,
an improvement might be introduced. But you should be aware that adding stiffness may make the matter
worse, by increasing internal stresses and paving the way for the next fatigue fracture.
If the breakdown was sudden but caused by a progressively deteriorating condition of certain components (as in
the case of fatigue fractures or corrosion), a corrective action program should be initiated. The plan has to
incorporate periodic examination of the parts involved, after the structure is repaired, to detect dangerously
spreading cracks before much damage occurs again.
Cracks must be removed completely by careful grinding before rewelding. If the base metal is in acceptable
condition, weld repair may be attempted with suitable ductile filler metal or low-hydrogen electrodes.
The process selected should introduce minimum heat and residual stresses, and possibly should be followed by
light hammer peening. Preheat and/or postheat, if necessary.
If separation has occurred, then a proper joint has to be designed and prepared, possibly by introducing a
transition element to make up for the volume of metal to be discarded.
Experience and common sense always are important, and even more so when dealing with weld repairs.
1Understanding How Components Failby Donald J. Wulpi is available from
http://www.asminternational.org/.Click on Bookstore, then on Failure Analysis, and then on Understanding
How Components Fail.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Training progresses through the categories, and practical exercises conclude each step. Each practical exercise
must pass a visual inspection and either X-ray or metallographic testing before the welder advances.
After the eight-week training and certification process, welders are assigned to individual departments that
require on-site welding or to the TOC's central welding shop, which has a pool of 30 welders. Once in the
assignment, a newly certified welder undergoes a period of on-the-job training with a qualified welder before he
or she is considered qualified.
Metal preparation is critical to GTAW repair. Weld training emphasizes the three C's: clean, clean, clean.
Titanium and niobium, for example, require stringent cleaning procedures using solvents and wire brushing to
clean the joints. For other metals, such as stainless steel, wire brushing alone is preferred to using abrasive
cleaners.
It's standard practice to spend more time cleaning and preparing a part than welding it. In many instances, the
weld process itself may take 30 seconds; the repair of a 1-in. crack in a niobium heat barrier shield that shrouds
a jet engine is one example. Critical to that weld, however, is the preparation: cleaning the surface properly,
fixturing the part, and ensuring the back side of the weld is shielded. For most aircraft repairs, the shielding gas
is 100 percent pure argon. The exceptions are an 80/20 mix of helium and argon for certain aluminum
applications in which distortion control is critical; and a 50/50 argon and helium mix for certain magnesium
applications.
sluggish, heat input and distortion are reduced. For example, if a welder is working on 0.0020-in. stainless steel
at 13 amps, the larger cup can save 5 amps, which is considerable when heat distortion is a concern.
Most aircraft repairs are in locations that require unconventional welding techniques. The shielding afforded by
the larger nozzle allows welders to extend their tungsten out farther to get into those locations. If the weld is
inside an exhaust duct or radial drive sleeve, the tungsten can stick out as far as 112 in. and the operator will
still have adequate shielding (see introductory photo).
Williams is product manager of TIG Solutions at Miller Electric Mfg. Co., 1635 W. Spencer St., P.O. Box 1079,
Appleton, WI 54912-1079, 920-734-9821 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting
920-7349821
end_of_the_skype_highlighting, fax 920-954-3633, [email protected], www.millerwelds.com.
Note
1. For more information on welding with GTAW inverters, see "Selecting the right tungsten: How your choice
affects AC GTAW" in the February 2004 issue of The FABRICATOR, p. 28.
INCONEL is a registered trademark of Special Metals Corp.
Delta's TOC welders use a larger GTAW cup that provides a 1-inch shielding gas envelope for less heat input
and distortion. The larger GTAW cup allows the welders to extend their tungsten out as far as 112 in. to make
welds in hard-to-reach locations.
2004
OK, so I'm driving by this high-rise, and I see a guy sitting on a beam about 20
stories high. He's looking out at the horizon with a cig hanging out of his mouth, and a smile on his face. It's
payday Friday, an hour away from quittin' time, and he has a ringer1coming.
He's been stick welding stiffener plates2using 7018 low-hydrogen rods. As soon as he throws his tool belt into
the gang box, he'll be hauling down 20 flights of stairs in about 20 seconds. He'll jump in his truck, stop and
grab a six-pack, go home, take a well-deserved hot shower, and then take his wife out for a big ol' steak dinner.
2204
Now let's flash forward about 200 years. My great- great- great- great- (you get the point) grandson looks up out
of his future-mobile pickup truck and sees a welder about 20 stories high. She's (yep, there are a lot more
women welding in the future also) sitting on a beam on a 500- story high-rise. (Buildings get taller as real estate
prices skyrocket in the future.)
It's payday Thursday,3and she's looking out at the horizon with a cig hanging out of her mouth (yep, people are
still smoking!) and a smile on her face. It's an hour away from quittin' time, and she has a ringer coming.
She's been stick welding stiffener plates using 7018 low-hydrogen rods. As soon as she throws her tool belt into
the gang box, she'll be hauling down 20 flights of stairs in about 20 seconds. She'll jump in her future-mobile
pickup truck, stop and grab a bottle of wine (she doesn't do beer), go home, take a well-deserved hot shower,
and then take her husband out for a big ol' steak dinner.
Hey, wait a minute; this is the future, yet it isn't much different from the past. That's right, welding on high-rises
ain't gonna change that much at all! I don't foresee anyone building a robot or machine that will climb around a
building like a crazy ol' ironworker will.
Even if a robot could be engineered and programmed, there are just too many variables to considermisaligned
beams, too short or too long beams with holes not aligned with the gusset plates, etc. I don't give a dang how
advanced we get, we can't program a machine to fix all the crazy problems a welder runs into on the job.
Now maybe I'm being too pessimistic about our future technology, but you have to realize what my generation
was told. I was told in sixth grade that I'd be flying around in a magnetic car by now. I was also told that robots
were going to take over all manual work. Heck, I remember hearing adults talking about how bad it was going
to be with the loss of jobs, and that we'd all be in the poorhouse because of those dangfangled new machines.
They said they might even get too smart and take over the world. Man, that scared the heck out of me! I
pictured robots patrolling the streets looking for mischievous little kids like me to take to their robot jails.
Well, sure enough, a lot of technology has been "robotized," especially in the welding field. But I'd venture a
guess that it is a very small percentage of the entire industry. And even with robots, a human must program,
quality control check, maintain, and repair them.
I spoke with an engineer who said he preferred someone who had worked as a welder to program his robotic
welding machine. Experienced welders have the feel for it and do a much better job of setting the programs
correctly.
I'm sure there will be some improvements in structural welding, such as better welding machines, maybe a little
more stable arc, and probably more flux-cored welding, but in my opinion, welding isn't going to change that
much. It'll still be the basics of relaxing your hand; watching the puddle; and using the right travel speed, rod
angle, and temperature.
The major factor affecting employment of welders is the health of the industries in which they work. Because
almost every manufacturing industry uses welding at some stage of manufacturing or in the repair and
maintenance of equipment, a strong economy will keep demand for welders high. A downturn affecting
industries such as auto manufacturing, construction, or petroleum, however, would have a negative impact on
the employment of welders in those areas, and could cause some layoffs. Levels of government funding for
infrastructure repairs and improvements also are expected to be an important determinant of the future number
of welding jobs."
GUIDE