Induction

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Induction and Sequences

Let n0 be an integer. Suppose that we want to prove that a statement S(n) about integers
n n0 is true for all n n0 . One way of doing this is to use the Induction Method. If we can
prove that
S(n0 ) is true, and
For each k n0 , if S(k) is true then S(k + 1) is true,

then it follows that S(n) is true for all n n0 .

Example 0: Consider the sequence an =

10n
for n 0. Then
n!

a0 = 1, a1 = 10, a2 = 50, a3 =

500
1250
, a4 =
.
3
3

In particular, a0 < a1 < a2 < a3 < a4 . Can we conclude that {an }


n=0 is an increasing
sequence? No, because, for instance,
a10 =

15262500
15625000
>
= a11 .
567
6237

In fact, we can prove that the sequence {an }


n=10 is decreasing. If n 10, then
an+1

10n+1
10n
10
10n 10
10n
=
=

<

<
= an .
(n + 1)!
n! n + 1
n! 11
n!

Example 1: Consider the sequence recursively dened by the conditions


a1 = 7 and an =

an1 + 1
for n 2 .
4

We want to show that this sequence is convergent using the Monotonic Sequence Theorem.
First we will show that the sequence is bounded below by 0.

Claim : an > 0 for all n 1.


Proof : We will use induction.
For n = 1, we have a1 = 7 > 0.
Suppose that ak > 0 for some k 1. Then
ak > 0 = ak + 1 > 1 = ak+1 =

1
ak + 1
> >0
4
4

and we are done.

Next we will show that the sequence is decreasing.

Claim : an+1 < an for all n 1.


Proof : We will use induction again.
For n = 1, we have a2 =

7+1
= 2 < 7 = a1 .
4

Suppose that ak+1 < ak for some k 1. We want to show that ak+2 < ak+1 . This is

true, because

ak+1 < ak = ak+1 + 1 < ak + 1 = ak+2 =

ak + 1
ak+1 + 1
<
= ak+1 .
4
4

Finally, since the sequences is bounded from below and decreasing, it is convergent by the
Monotonic Sequence Theorem.

Example 2: In this Example we will again show that the sequence dened by
a1 = 7 and an =

an1 + 1
for n 2
4

is convergent. But this time we will not use induction in the second part of the proof.
First we will show that the sequence is bounded below by 1/3.

Claim : an > 1/3 for all n 1.


Proof : We will use induction.
For n = 1, we have a1 = 7 > 1/3.
Suppose that ak > 1/3 for some k 1. Then:
ak >

1
4
ak + 1
1
= ak + 1 > = ak+1 =
>
3
3
4
3

Now we will prove that the sequence is decreasing. As we already now that an > 1/3 and
therefore 1 3an < 0 for all n 1, it immediately follows that
an+1 an =

an + 1
1
an = (1 3an ) < 0
4
4

and hence an+1 < an for all n 1.


Once again, since the sequences is bounded from below and decreasing, it is convergent by the
Monotonic Sequence Theorem.

Example 3: In this Example we will one more time show that the sequence dened by
a1 = 7 and an =

an1 + 1
for n 2
4

is convergent, but this time without using the Monotonic Sequence Theorem.
Note that

1
an + 1 1
1
an+1 =
=
3
4
3
4

(
)
1
an
3

for n 1. Therefore, we obtain


1
1
an =
3
4

1
an1
3

( )2 (
)
( )n2(
) ( )n1(
)
1
1
1
1
1
1
=
an2
= =
a2
=
a1
4
3
4
3
4
3

and use to conclude that

(( ) (
(
)
)) (
)
( )n1
n1
1
1
1
1
1
lim an
= lim
a1
= a1
lim
=0
n
n
3
4
3
3 n 4

as lim rn = 0 for |r| < 1. Hence lim an =


n

1
.
3

Two remarks about this proof: Firstly, note that this time we did not use the fact a1 = 7 at
all. That is, we proved that any sequence dened by this recursion relation converges to 1/3,
no matter what the initial condition is. Secondly, there is an induction hidden somewhere in
there. Find it and write it out explicitly as an exercise.
Last revision: April 17, 2014

You might also like