Barangay Justice System
Barangay Justice System
Barangay Justice System
The barangays are the smallest political subdivisions in the Philippines. They are the smallest units of
government. Smallest in terms of area of jurisdiction but big in the sense that they are nearest to our
people.
The barangays are given mandate to help in the administration of justice. Their first duty is to
conduct conciliation proceedings in civil cases and in criminal cases where the penalty does not exceed
one year of imprisonment or a fine not exceeding five thousand pesos, before the same can be filed in
court. The second is that power granted to Punong Barangays to issue Barangay Protection Order (BPO)
under Section 14 of RA 9262. The third is the establishment of a Barangay Council for the Protection of
Children under RA 9344. The fourth is the creation of the Barangay Agrarian Reform Committee under
Section 46 of RA 6657 wherein this Committee is tasked to mediate and conciliate parties involved in an
agrarian dispute including matters related to tenurial and financial arrangements.
It is PD 1508, sections 399-422 of the Local Government Code of 1991, otherwise known as Barangay
Justice
(a) Exercise administrative supervision over the conciliation panels provided herein;
(b) Meet regularly once a month to provide a forum for exchange of ideas among its members and the
public on matters relevant to the amicable settlement of disputes, and to enable various conciliation panel
members to share with one another their observations and experiences in effecting speedy resolution of
disputes; and
(c) Exercise such other powers and perform such other duties and functions as may be prescribed by law
or ordinance.
GR: As a rule all cases where the parties are actually residing in the same city or municipality are within
the competence of the lupon of each barangay. Thus the law says:
EXN:Section 408. Subject Matter for Amicable Settlement; Exception Thereto. - The lupon of each
barangay shall have authority to bring together the parties actually residing in the same city or municipality
for amicable settlement of all disputes except:
(a) Where one party is the government, or any subdivision or instrumentality thereof;
(b) Where one party is a public officer or employee, and the dispute relates to the performance of his
official functions;
(c) Offenses punishable by imprisonment exceeding one (1) year or a fine exceeding Five thousand
pesos (P5,000.00);
(d) Offenses where there is no private offended party;
(e) Where the dispute involves real properties located in different cities or municipalities unless the
parties thereto agree to submit their differences to amicable settlement by an appropriate lupon;
(f) Disputes involving parties who actually reside in barangays of different cities or municipalities, except
where such barangay units adjoin each other and the parties thereto agree to submit their differences
to amicable settlement by an appropriate lupon;
(g) Such other classes of disputes which the President may determine in the interest of Justice or upon
the recommendation of the Secretary of Justice.
Objections to venue shall be raised in the mediation proceedings before the punong barangay; otherwise,
the same shall be deemed waived. Any legal question which may confront the punong barangay in
resolving objections to venue herein referred to may be submitted to the Secretary of Justice, or his duly
designated representative, whose ruling thereon shall be binding.
(a) Who may initiate proceeding - Upon payment of the appropriate filing fee, any individual who
has a cause of action against another individual involving any matter within the authority of the lupon may
complain, orally or in writing, to the lupon chairman of the barangay.
(b) Mediation by lupon chairman - Upon receipt of the complaint, the lupon chairman shall within
the next working day summon the respondent(s), with notice to the complainant(s) for them and their
witnesses to appear before him for a mediation of their conflicting interests. If he fails in his mediation effort
within fifteen (15) days from the first meeting of the parties before him, he shall forthwith set a date for the
constitution of the pangkat in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter.
(c) Suspension of prescriptive period of offenses - While the dispute is under mediation, conciliation,
or arbitration, the prescriptive periods for offenses and cause of action under existing laws shall be
interrupted upon filing the complaint with the punong barangay. The prescriptive periods shall resume upon
receipt by the complainant of the complainant or the certificate of repudiation or of the certification to file
action issued by the lupon or pangkat secretary: Provided, however, That such interruption shall not exceed
sixty (60) days from the filing of the complaint with the punong barangay.
(d) Issuance of summons; hearing; grounds for disqualification - The pangkat shall convene not later
than three (3) days from its constitution, on the day and hour set by the lupon chairman, to hear both
parties and their witnesses, simplify issues, and explore all possibilities for amicable settlement. For this
purpose, the pangkat may issue summons for the personal appearance of parties and witnesses before it. In
the event that a party moves to disqualify any member of the pangkat by reason of relationship, bias,
interest, or any other similar grounds discovered after the constitution of the pangkat, the matter shall be
resolved by the affirmative vote of the majority of the pangkat whose decision shall be final. Should
disqualification be decided upon, the resulting vacancy shall be filled as herein provided for.
(e) Period to arrive at a settlement - The pangkat shall arrive at a settlement or resolution of the
dispute within fifteen (15) days from the day it convenes in accordance with this section. This period shall, at
the discretion of the pangkat, be extendible for another period which shall not exceed fifteen (15) days,
except in clearly meritorious cases.
As stated, those matters within the authority of the lupon shall pass first the barangay justice system
before any party may go to court. What are these cases then within the competence of the lupon?
In Civil Cases:
It appears from the provision of the law, all civil cases involving individuals who are residing in the
same city or municipality, regardless of the amount involved must be brought first with the barangay justice
system before any court action may be filed. The only instances where a direct action to the court is
allowed are:
1. Under letter (a), if one of the parties is the national government, direct filing is allowed. If one of
the parties is a province, city or municipality or the barangay itself, direct filing is allowed. Or if one of the
parties is an instrumentality of the national government, direct filing is allowed. Instrumentality refers to any
agency of the National Government not integrated within the department framework, vested with special
functions or jurisdiction by law, endowed with some if not all corporate powers, administering special funds,
and enjoying operational autonomy, usually through a Charter. (MIAA vs. CA, 495 SCRA 591, 617). Examples
of a government instrumentality are the Manila International Airport Authority (MIAA vs. CA, i.d.) and the
Government Service Insurance System (GSIS vs. City Treasurer of Manila, 609 SCRA 330, 346)
2. Under letter (b), a suit against a barangay official or a policeman or a sanggunian bayan member
or a Mayor and the complaint relates to the performance of his duties, can be filed directly in court without
need of barangay conciliation.
3. An example of letter (e) would be an action to recover ownership of two (2) parcels of land, one is
located in Municipality A and the other is located in Municipality B.
4. An example of letter (f) would be an action for damages, but one party is residing in Barangay A
of Municipality B, while the other party is residing in Barangay C of Municipality D. However, if barangays A
and C adjoin each other, then the parties may agree to submit their differences to the lupon of either
Barangay A or Barangay C. But the parties are not compulsorily required to agree. It is merely an option
given by law for them to agree to refer their problem for conciliation.
In Criminal Cases
Not all criminal cases require conciliation proceedings. Only minor offenses are brought within the
coverage of the barangay justice system. This is because of the fundamental principle in criminal law that
crimes are committed against the State and the State is the real offended party. As such, crime cannot be
the subject of compromise by private offended parties. (Kapunan, Criminal Law, 1990 Edition page 192; Luis
B. Reyes, The Revised Penal Code, Book I, 2006 Edition page 600)
Thus under Section 408, letter ( c ) offenses punishable by imprisonment exceeding one (1) year or a
fine exceeding Five thousand pesos (P5,000.00) are exempt from the coverage of the katarungan
pambarangay law. Therefore, only cases which penalties do not exceed one year imprisonment or a fine
not exceeding five thousand pesos are covered by the law. Also even if the penalties are within the
coverage if there is no private offended party, then the law shall not be made to apply under letter (d) of
Section 408.
To quote Justice Quisumbing the primordial objective of the Katarungang Pambarangay Rules is to
reduce the number of litigations and prevent the deterioration of the quality of justice which has been
brought about by the indiscriminate filing of cases in the courts.
To attain this goal, PD 1508, now Sections 399-422 of the Local Government Code, requires the parties
to undergo a conciliation proceedings before the Barangay Chairman or the Pangkat as a condition
before filing a case in court. As a rule, this requirement shall be satisfied in all civil actions. In criminal cases,
all those cases whose prescribed penalty exceed one year of imprisonment or a fine exceeding P5,000.00,
shall be brought first for barangay conciliation before filing the cases to the Prosecutors Office or to the
Courts. Non compliance with this requirement is a ground to dismiss the case for pre-maturity. Thus, the
Local Government Code provides:
(b) Where Parties May Go Directly to Court. - The parties may go directly to court in the following instances:
(1) Where the accused is under detention;
(2) Where a person has otherwise been deprived of personal liberty calling for habeas corpus
proceedings;
(3) Where actions are coupled with provisional remedies such as preliminary injunction,
attachment, delivery of personal property and support pendente lite; and
(4) Where the action may otherwise be barred by the statute of limitations.
(c) Conciliation among members of indigenous cultural communities. - The customs and traditions of
indigenous cultural communities shall be applied in settling disputes between members of the cultural
communities.
When one of the parties is a corporation or a partnership, the case may be directly filed in court. Section