India Towards Energy Independence 2030 PDF
India Towards Energy Independence 2030 PDF
India Towards Energy Independence 2030 PDF
January 2014
January 2014
Introduction
India is the worlds fourth largest economy1 as well as the fourth largest energy consumer.
India imports a substantial portion of its energy 80 per cent of its oil, 18 per cent of its gas,
and now even 23 per cent of its coal. As the Indian economy continues to grow, so will its
energy consumption, especially as the growth of its manufacturing sector catches up with
services and agriculture. With domestic resource production facing various challenges, the
general expectation has been that Indian energy imports will continue to grow, and energy
security concerns will intensify.
The outlook and options for Indian energy independence therefore becomes an important
topic. A 2030 outlook is particularly relevant since it is difficult to significantly change energy
policy in 5 or 10 years, but almost any boundary conditions can be changed over a 15-year
period. Moreover, there have been few if any, in-depth perspectives on this topic for 2030.
This white paper builds off the 2030 Global Energy Perspective, McKinseys substantial
body of research on energy demand and supply, and our understanding of the evolution of the
global and Indian energy sectors. We have tried to address some of the basic questions that
arise about Indian energy in 2030:
Is Indias current energy trajectory sustainable, as is or with some adjustments?
To what extent can India aim to achieve energy independence by 2030? What
opportunities does India have to increase domestic energy supply and curb demand over
and above the current trajectory?
How can we make the most of the new global supply dynamics and technologies?
This paper is a thought starter, intended to offer one set of directional options, rather than a
singular prescription. We look forward to feedback, suggestions and dialogue.
Exhibit 1 shows Indias primary energy demand by fuel type in 2010 and business as usual
(BAU) projections for 2030. Primary demand in 2010 stood at 691mtoe. Of this, about 41 per
cent was coal, 24 per cent was liquids, 23 per cent was non-commercial fuel, 8 per cent was
gas, and the remainder was a mix of hydro, renewables and nuclear power. Despite recent
strides in renewable and nuclear power, this is a predominantly fossil fuel based mix, with 73
per cent of primary energy coming from coal, oil and gas.
Exhibit 1
CAGR
Per cent
1,508
160
56
113
35
21
Non-commercial
Nuclear
Renewables
Hydro
Gas
373
Liquids
750
Coal
0
8.4
8.0
3.8
3.9
4.1
691
160
10
53
166
7
12
283
2010
2030 BAU
Our 2030 BAU case projects Indias primary energy demand in 2030 at 1508mtoe, based
on bottom up estimates of GDP growth, the composition of the Indian economy, and the
consequent demand growth from industry, buildings, transportation and other segments.
Power demand is assumed to grow at 5 per cent per annum through 2030. Energy efficiency
gains are also built in at 1 per cent per annum improvement through 2030, reducing energy
intensity from 0.56koe/USD in 2010 to 0.47koe/USD in 2030.
In the 2030 BAU scenario, 60 per cent of Indias power generation is assumed to come from
coal, taking coal demand up to 750mtoe. Liquids demand, primarily for transportation,
grows at 4 per cent per annum to 373mtoe. Gas demand grows to 113mtoe, constrained
by high LNG prices that compete with liquid alternatives. Hydro power reaches 21mtoe.
Renewable and nuclear power grow as per stated policy objectives and at similar growth rates
thereafter through 2030. The balance of primary energy will therefore need to come from noncommercial sources.
In 2010, India imported 30 per cent of its primary energy requirements (38 per cent of its
primary commercial energy requirements). Exhibit 2 lays out the increase in fuel supply
from indigenous and imported sources that will be required to meet the 1508mtoe of
primary energy demand in 2030. Although BAU assumes substantial increases in domestic
production of coal, oil, gas, hydro, nuclear and renewables, these are far short of the
requirements to make up for declines in producing fields and mines, and meet demand. As a
result, import dependence would increase to 51 per cent of primary energy requirements.
Exhibit 2
Imports
222
573
313
691
140
207
11
11
79
50
28
28
Domestic production
44
44
29
202
772
(51%)
20
260
736
(49%)
484
2010
1,508
Production
decline
Coal
Liquids
Gas
Hydro
Nuclear
Renewables
2030
At the estimated 51 per cent primary energy imports, India will be one of the most importdependent countries in the world, as shown in Exhibit 3. By comparison, the US and China
are expected to have import dependence of 1 per cent and 20 per cent by 2030. In the case
of China, this includes imports through long distance oil and gas pipelines from central Asia,
Indochina and Russia. Moreover, using 2010 numbers from the major energy consuming
economies as an indicative comparison, only Japan and Germany have higher import
dependence at 80 and 60 per cent respectively. But unlike India, these countries have greater
affordability and the International Energy Agency (IEA) emergency response measures as a
backup.
Exhibit 3
Indonesia
Russian Federation
2030, India
-89
-80
Korea
Brazil
China
10
US
Germany
Japan
Expected to
decrease to
1 per cent
by 2030
22
UK
India
Expected to
increase to
20 per cent
by 2030
-32
27
30
21 51
60
80
Possible import dependence above 50 per cent of 1500mtoe and growing is a clear
indication that a different set of energy outcomes versus BAU will be required if India is
to keep its growing economy supplied with sufficient reliable and cost effective energy.
Domestic resources will need to be explored and exploited to target levels that have not been
traditionally considered in current long-term plans. This will require stable, viable market
mechanisms that attract sufficient investment across the value chains. All possible energy
sources will need attention, including coal, conventional and unconventional oil and gas,
renewables, nuclear power and energy efficiency.
There are six factors that give India the opportunity to address its energy security concerns:
With estimated coal reserves of 293 billion tonnes and minimal recent additional
exploration, India has ample opportunity to increase coal production, provided transparent
resource access and development regulations are put in place
The experience of North America has shown the potential of unconventional oil and gas.
It is clear that India has substantial unconventional hydrocarbon potential, even though
reserve estimates vary widely at this early stage
Conventional oil and gas still holds great potential in India, especially via the redevelopment
and intensive exploitation of existing mature basins, provided viable pricing and taxation
mechanisms are in place
India has had remarkable momentum in increasing renewable power capacity (both wind
and solar), and doing so while setting global cost benchmarks
With a vast proportion of Indias infrastructure yet to be built, India can leapfrog the
developed world in energy efficient buildings, long distance rail transportation, and an
optimal road-rail modal mix
10
India has a unique opportunity to create stronger and more secure supply partnerships
with oil and gas supplying countries in the Middle East and Africa, who will be seeking large
and stable markets to absorb imports displaced by the US.
As described in the next section, we believe that it is possible for India to achieve substantially
higher domestic energy supply, lower demand, and more secure imports than in the BAU
case.
11
1,508
160
56
1,387
35
113
21
35
21
373
691
160
10
53
166
147
105
135
Noncommercial
Nuclear
Renewables
Hydro
Gas
-0.49
8.4
11.4
3.8
4.8
304
Liquids
3.1
640
Coal
4.2
7
12
750
283
2010
2030 BAU
2030 Energy
Independence
The 10 initiatives required are summarised in Exhibit 6, along with the impact in mtoe that they
have on imports relative to the BAU case.
12
Exhibit 5
Units
2010
Coal1
MTPA
484
775
1,220
Liquids
MTOE
34
39
80
Gas
MMSCMD
132
165
390
Hydro
GW (capacity)
37
70
70
Renewables2
GW (capacity)
20
80
145
Nuclear
GW (capacity)
4.5
23
23
Non-comm.
MTOE
160
160
147
Exhibit 6
Initiative
2030 BAU imports
772
213
Reduce
demand
Secure
imports
33
90
13
31
92
29
271
2030
Energy
Independence
imports
13
The biggest shift in the Energy Independence scenario, however, is in the import dependence,
as shown in Exhibit 7, which reduces to 1520 per cent (vs 51 per cent in BAU). Coal imports
reduce to 9 per cent (vs 50 per cent in BAU), liquids imports reduce to 62 per cent (vs 90 per
cent in BAU), and gas imports reduce to existing LNG contracts (vs 53 per cent in BAU). While
liquid imports remain high in this scenario, there is considerably higher flexibility and tolerance
across the fossil fuel basket, to optimise between coal, liquid and gas import volumes.
Exhibit 7
62
90
80
Gas
Hydro
50
23
Liquid
2030 Energy
Independence
2030 BAU
27
53
18
0
Renewable 0
Nuclear
30%
51%
Existing
LNG
contracts
16
1520%
The remainder of this section describes each of the 10 initiatives for energy independence,
and the actions required to make them a reality.
Coal will remain the bedrock of Indias energy requirements for the foreseeable future.
Achieving 1200mtpa of coal production by 2030 will require incremental annual production of
950mtpa, to make up for existing mines that will decline over the next 15 years. This will require
India to:
Accelerate development of 180-odd Coal India projects which are at various stages of
approval and development
Fast-track 220 captive coal blocks which have already been allocated, with a production
potential of 850mtpa. 110 of these blocks are awaiting approvals or land acquisition, and
another 110 have seen no development
Allow private players to explore, develop and market coal. India has 7 per cent of the
worlds coal reserves and only 0.5 per cent of its exploration expenditure. Exploration and
development at scale will require market-based pricing and a robust coal market.
14
Several recent progressive steps have resolved many pending bottlenecks in upstream oil and
gas. To enable rapid development of 100mmscmd of unconventional gas, India must:
Expand the scope of its shale gas policy to include private and public sector players alike
Ensure sufficient fiscal and infrastructural incentives to attract investment in unconventional
supply chains and services
Allow full exploration and exploitation of all resources in NELP blocks
Allow market determined pricing for unconventional gas and the freedom to market gas.
To achieve 150mtoe of conventional oil and gas production in 2030, India will need to ensure
the viability of redeveloping its existing mature basins, e.g., western offshore, attract sufficient
investment into new licensing rounds, and remove the remaining bottlenecks to resource
development. In particular, it will require to:
Allow market pricing of crude oil from nomination blocks, to make the necessary high cost
investments in EOR4and the related technology developmentviable
Ensure market pricing for gas and the freedom to market gas produced under NELP or the
proposed open acreage policy
Streamline contract administration by enforcing time bound deemed approvals with
management committee accountability, codifying standard practices around grey zones in
product sharing contracts, defining policies for license extension, exploration in producing
blocks and extension of block areas, strengthening and empowering DGH5 and making it
a statutory body focused on approving and monitoring work programs, budgets and field
development plans.
Traditional models are increasingly proving unviable to electrify and supply villages. Yet, the
demand surge and economic benefits in newly electrified villages are plain to see. Off grid solar
(and in places wind, bio mass and micro hydel) are better suited, scalable solutions to electrify
remote villages and supplement supply in partially electrified ones. To scale up off grid solar, India
will need to:
Fine-tune, scale up and roll out models that have been successfully piloted, such as the
revamped DDG6 scheme, while introducing new elements like competitive bidding and
viability gap funding to ensure competition and transparency
Introduce village level O&M capabilities and governance to manage distributed solar assets
Devise interventions/ incentives for rural micro-enterprises and other anchor loads (e.g.,
telecom towers) to shift to renewable solutions vs using diesel power
Channelise and attract funds from central and state budgetary allocations, corporate social
responsibility budgets, as well as private risk capital.
2
3
4
5
6
India has demonstrated exceptional progress on the renewables front, more than doubling
installed capacity in the last 5 years, from 14.5 GW in 2008 to approximately 30 GW by
December 2013. This translates to more than 3 GW of installed capacity per year. Though
outstanding, India would need to, on average, double this rate over the next 15 years to
achieve the 100 GW aspirations. This would need India to:
Enforce Renewable Purchase Obligations (RPOs) unilaterally. Targets have been set for
each state, but only 7 out of 29 states have achieved them. Renewable Energy Certificates
(RECs) remain unsold, forcing REC prices to floor levels, significantly eroding developer
returns. Mandating states to meet RPO targets, and enforcing penalties for noncompliance would be required
Invest in low wind speed technology with focus on building domestic R&D and
manufacturing capabilities to add 40+ GW by 2030
Devise interventions and incentives for rural micro-enterprises and other anchor loads
(e.g., telecom towers) to shift to renewables vs using diesel
Introduce a peaking power policy to allow developers to invest in storage to make solar
viable for evening peaks.
Indias overall energy intensity at 0.56koe/USD is high compared to even other developing
countries like Brazil at 0.25koe/USD or Malaysia at 0.4koe/USD, indicating significant
improvement potential, as shown in Exhibit 8. India has started positively on this journey,
achieving energy intensity reductions of 1 per cent per year. A substantial amount of demand
reduction is already assumed in the BAU case (equivalent to 344mtoe with energy intensity
dropping to 0.47koe/USD). An energy intensity of 0.4koe/USD by 2030 could be achieved by:
Reducing residential and commercial energy intensity. This would involve increasing
penetration of labelled appliances from 20 to 90 per cent, CFL/ LEDs from 15 to 90 per
cent, and stringent implementation of the ECBC norms for commercial buildings
Targeting energy reduction in power intensive industrial segments through year on year
targets, time of day tariffs and incentivising production of energy efficient industrial
equipment
Driving energy efficiency in agriculture, moving towards electric pumps (from diesel) and
mandating use of Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) star labelled equipment
Reducing AT&C losses: Indias AT&C losses at about 2324 per cent are extremely high
compared to 5 to 7 per cent in best practice countries like Japan, Germany and Korea.
Even some developing countries, e.g., Malaysia have achieved sub-10 per cent loss
levels. India could achieve these levels through a mix of technology (e.g., smart grids) and
effective distribution ownership and management.
15
16
Exhibit 8
China
India
0.5
Indonesia
0.4
Malaysia
0.3
Brazil
0.2
Australia
0.1
UK
US
Germany
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
12,000
13,000
14,000
India has a natural advantage of lower average size of cars, which translates to lower
emissions and higher fuel efficiency. Yet it lags the European Union in car fuel efficiency, and
has not yet enacted transport fuel efficiency norms. Efficiency of trucks is even further off from
the European standards, due to older technology and poor road infrastructure. To save an
additional 47mtoe per year relative to the BAU case (reducing transportation fuel demand from
184mtoe in 2030 to 137mtoe), India should:
Incentivise a shift in long-distance cargo from road to rail, increasing rail from 39 per cent of
ton-kms moved in 2012 to 54 per cent by 2030
Draft and implement a policy to promote higher tonnage commercial vehicles
Introduce fuel consumption norms at the earliest with built-in year on year improvements
Implement the national bio-ethanol policy to start blending 5 per cent bio-ethanol in petrol
and diesel
Incentivise faster adoption of electric vehicles to shift demand from liquids to power,
especially during off-peak hours.
Strong global energy companies are a necessary foundation for energy security. To enable its
energy companies to secure supplies and create sufficient surplus for investment, India will
need to:
Ensure financial strength of its energy companies, to enable them to invest in new capacity,
make acquisitions, take risks, and develop technology
17
Allow its energy PSUs sufficient freedom to develop global talent pools that can seamlessly
operate in multiple markets, and transfer capabilities across borders
Enable energy companies to make cross border corporate acquisitions for capability,
presence and momentum, not merely assets, and establish material, deep presence in a
few relevant geographies
Strengthen energy company processes and organisations to allow effective governance,
capital and operating efficiency and monitoring.
Shale oil production in the US is expected to rise to levels beyond the current US imports from
outside North and Central America. This will shift global crude oil flows (Exhibit 9). The Middle
East and Africa, from being exporters to the west, will seek stable, large markets in the east.
This shift gives India a unique opportunity to create an India-Middle East energy corridor to:
Enter into new contractual arrangements with oil and gas suppliers, and potentially
consider establishing an AsiaMiddle East Energy Agency, to share information and
facilitate emergency response agreements
Make joint complementary investments across upstream and downstream, including
Middle Eastern investments in Indian refining and petrochemicals, Indian upstream
investments in the Middle East, and feedstock and energy intensive production of urea,
aluminium, steel and petrochemicals in the Middle East
Create shared energy infrastructure between India and the Middle East, such as pipelines,
ports and storage, strategic storage and dedicated mega ships. Such infrastructure has
already been established between RussiaEU, RussiaChina, MyanmarChina, and
North AfricaSouthern Europe.
Exhibit 9
The direction of global oil flows will change as the US reduces its oil
imports
US crude oil imports by source
MTOE
Europe/Med
Arab Gulf
468
20
75
West Africa
80
Canada
115
Latin America
179
US domestic
crude oil
production
SOURCE: McKinsey analysis
279
2011
2025
279
702
Supply from
Middle East
and Africa
will seek
stable
markets in
the east
18
India is already helping catalyse a shift in the structure and conduct of the global LNG industry,
through its forays into Henry Hub indexed LNG exports from the US, and its upstream
investments in East Africa. To take full advantage of the shale gas revolution in North America,
and consolidate its natural advantage in the Indian Ocean rim, India should:
Continue to expand its presence in North America through upstream and midstream
positions in the US and Canada, serving to expand volumes, defray regulatory risk and
serve as a natural hedge against Henry Hub
Work towards a lead role in the sustainable development of East Africa as an integrated
gas supply hub, including exploration and production, local industry development, relevant
local manufacturing such as urea, and LNG liquefaction for export.
Inter-ministry coordination
With 8 to 10 central ministries involved in energy decisions besides the states, a mechanism
for effective, continuous coordination would be needed to achieve the supply and demand
shifts required.
A cross-ministerial body on energy with representation from the key ministries at the minister
and secretary level could be a possible option. Such a body would help ease approvals
required at the state and central level, drive initiatives to shift demand from liquids to power
and renewables, and maintain the government-to-government interface required to help
international acquisitions.
In addition, a central minister-level appointment with a small secretariat to coordinate energy
issues and drive towards the aspiration of energy independence could provide a strong
impetus to an energy independence agenda.
India must focus on increasing technology depth across all parts of the value chain through:
Larger R&D investments, since Indian energy companies spend between half to one-fifth
of their global counterparts on R&D, on a per barrel basis
Greater R&D effectiveness through stronger R&D processes and approaches, dedicated
research cadres, closer monitoring of outcomes and a greater commercial orientation
Global and Indian collaborations, which could take the form of bilateral alliances, industry
forums, academic alliances or venture investments in technology firms
Incentivising and attracting local manufacturing in the energy value chain, including oil field
services, specialised materials and chemicals, and energy efficient storage and usage
technologies.
While some of these have been mentioned earlier, the importance of reliable market
mechanisms in attracting private investment cannot be over emphasised, including:
Market-linked prices and marketing freedom for gas and coal
Moving subsidies to an arms length basis, directly to consumers as far as possible, to
avoid distortions in industry conduct and inappropriate incentives for consumption
Ensuring new policies are not enacted with retrospective effect.
19
20
An ambitious agenda for energy independence would benefit from a source of funding to
be able to drive targeted investments and influence outcomes. An energy fund established
with contributions from large Indian energy players and the government, run on the lines of a
professional fund, could serve to:
Enable and catalyse consortia to bid for large international assets and corporate entities
(primarily across coal, gas and liquids), and
Share investment risk during development of unproven technologies and applications, and
incubate new technology ventures.
An agenda for energy independence for India by 2030 is ambitious but by no means
unachievable. The need for change is clear. Many efforts are already underway. Alignment
on a practical set of initiatives, backed up with strong institutional support and leadership
commitment are now required.
The authors wish to thank Suhail Sameer, Kshitij Sanghi, Karan Jain, and Nipun Gosain
for their contributions to this whitepaper.
Energy
January 2014
Designed by Visual Aids India
Copyright McKinsey & Company
www.mckinsey.com/